Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization Among Second-Line Therapies for Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Provincial Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by increased platelet destruction. Current guidelines recommend either rituximab, splenectomy, or thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) in chronic ITP patients who are unresponsive to first-line corticosteroids or who are corticosteroid-dependent. Though there are known practice variations in choice and timing of second-line therapy in Canada, there are scarce data comparing the outcomes and resource utilization in patients who received these second-line treatment strategies. In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study, we aim to identify differences in health services utilization and ITP-related outcomes in patients who received different second-line ITP therapies. Methods: Adults who received rituximab, splenectomy or TPO-RA as second-line therapy for ITP during 2012-2019 in the province of Alberta, Canada were identified via the provincial special drug access database. Institutional ethics board approval was obtained. We examined treatment patterns including sequencing of therapies and predictors of second-line therapies. Major outcomes documented included ITP-related hospitalizations (bleeding or infections), blood product utilization, major bleeding and thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate overall survival and the cumulative incidence of hospitalizations. Log-rank test was used to assess for differences between groups. Results: At the time of interim analysis, 189 adults with chronic ITP received second-line therapy. The median age at the time of second-line therapy was 58 years; 102 (54%) were female. Patients who received TPO-RA were significantly older than those who received rituximab or splenectomy (median 65 years vs 53 vs 49 years; P=0.0008). Rituximab was the most prescribed second-line therapy (108; 57%) followed by splenectomy (45; 24%) and TPO-RA (36; 19%) (Figure 1). Compared to recipients of rituximab, those who received TPO-RA had higher rates of hypertension (64% vs 33%, P=0.004), dyslipidemia (58% vs 20%, P <0.001), and prior history of myocardial infarction (22% vs 6%, P=0.02). On multivariable logistic regression, age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, P=0.01) and a history of thromboembolism prior to second-line therapy (aOR 2.7, 95% 1.04-7.1, P=0.04) were significantly associated with TPO-RA prescription. Sex, rural residence, ITP etiology, major bleeding prior to second-line therapy, and abnormal bone marrow findings were not significant predictors of second-line therapy. During 773 person-years of follow-up, 23 deaths occurred, due to cardiac events (n=6), infections (n=5), malignancies (n=4), bleeding (n=3), and other or unclear causes (n=5). The 5-year overall survival was 88% (95% CI 82-94%), significantly shorter in recipients of second-line TPO-RA (80%) than rituximab (90%) and splenectomy (94%; log-rank P=0.04; Figure 2). The 5-year relapse-free survival was 55% (95% CI 46-65%), with no significant difference between treatment groups (log-rank P=0.8). Overall, 59 (31%) patients required ITP-related hospitalizations following second-line therapy. The median times to hospitalization were 5.1 years, 12.2 years, and not reached in patients receiving rituximab, splenectomy, and TPO-RA, respectively (log-rank P=0.1). Intravenous immunoglobulins and platelet transfusions were frequently utilized across all treatment groups (Table 2). DISCUSSION: Despite a myriad of therapeutic options for chronic ITP, patients still experience a high burden of hospitalization for bleeding or infections, and transfusion requirements. Patients with advanced age and a history of thromboembolism were more likely to receive TPO-RA as second-line ITP therapy. We did not observe a significant difference in relapse-free survival or ITP-related hospitalizations across different second-line therapies, although this may be limited by our sample size and duration of follow-up. At present, significant cost of TPO-RAs limits their availability as second-line therapy in many publicly funded healthcare systems. Real-world data are important in guiding future cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the impact of second-line therapies on the overall healthcare system. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sun: Shire: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Related Prolonged Cytopenia Is Frequent and Adverse Factor Affecting Survival of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1790.1790 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1790-1790

Author(s):

Petra Obrtlikova ◽

Anna Jonasova ◽

Magda Siskova ◽

Eduard Cmunt ◽

Adela Berkova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

High Dose ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 1790 Background: The immunochemotherapy regimen composed of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) has emerged as highly effective frontline or second line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This regimen may be however associated with prolonged cytopenia and the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Aims and methods: In our retrospective single center analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and the toxicity of FC or FCR regimen in unselected population of CLL patients with treatment indication. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was calculated for all patients as intent to treat analysis. The prolonged cytopenia was defined as cytopenia (grade 2–4 according to CTCAE v.4 ) developing during of after the last cycle of FC/FCR and persisting two or more months. Cytopenia was evaluated in patients with follow-up at least 6 months after this treatment. Patients were excluded from analysis of cytopenia if they underwent immediate other treatment (antibody maintenance, high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation, or they received other therapy due to unsatisfactory response to FCR). Patients with missing laboratory data after FC(R) were also excluded. Kaplan Maier curves for PFS and OS were calculated and log rank test was used for survival comparison. Results: Altogether, 252 patients started the treatment with FC or FCR in the years 2000–2012 at our institution. There were 86 (34%) women and 166 (66%) men with a median age of 62 years (31–87) at the time of FC(R) therapy. 52 (21%) pts received FC regimen, including 40 pts treated in first line therapy and 12 pts in second line therapy. FCR therapy was administered in 200 pts (79%): 153 pts received FCR as first line therapy, 38 pts as second line therapy and 8 pts as third or fouth line therapy. The median number of FC cycles was 5 (1–8) with or without R. The estimated OS for the first line therapy was 87,5% in FCR group vs 80% at 3y in FC group (p ns) (Hallek,CLL8: 87% vs 83%) and PFS was 70% in FCR group vs 50% in FC group (p=0,004) with the median of follow-up 45 months. Altogether 184 pts fulfill the criteria for cytopenia analysis. The most frequent immediate subsequent therapy considered as exclusion for this analysis was ASCT consolidation (n 20). Out of 184 pts, 146 recieved FC(R) as 1st line treatment and 38 subsequent therapy. The prolonged cytopenia was observed in 54 pts (29%), 42 (29%) in 1st line group and 12 (32%) in subsequent line group. Median duration of cytopenia was 8 m (2–65), 29 out of 54 patients have had persistent cytopenia at the time of last follow up. The cumulative probability to develop cytopenia was 30.3% at 2y among all pts and 29.7% among first line FCR treated pts. There was no significant difference between FC and FCR treated pts. Eleven pts developed MDS/AML, 7 cases were observed in the followed group of 184 pts (with probability 6.1% at 6y), in all cases the cytopenia preceded the MDS onset, 6y probability to develop MDS was 25.2% for patients who develop prolonged cytopenia after FC(R). Moreover 2 MDS and 1 AML were observed among 20 pts treated with ASCT (6y probability 5.6%, 8y probability 22.5%). The OS probability from 1stcycle of FC(R) was significantly better for pts without cytopenia (75.5% vs 57.5% at 5y, p<0.005), nonsigificant trend was observed if only first line FCR pts were analyzed (88% vs 85%). The median survival for the MDS pts from the time of MDS dg was 6 months only. Conclusions: Although the FCR is the best available standard treatment option for CLL pts, it is associated with prolonged cytopenia in 30% of cases. These patients with prolonged cytopenia afte FC(R) have considerably high probability (25.2%) to develop MDS and they have worse OS compared to pts without cytopenia. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Superior PFS2 with VTD Vs TD for Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Eligible, Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Updated Analysis of Gimema MMY-3006 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.196.196 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 196-196 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paola Tacchetti ◽

Lucia Pantani ◽

Valerio De Stefano ◽

Elena Zamagni ◽

Jacopo Peccatori ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Salvage Therapy ◽

Study Endpoint ◽

Primary Study ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Free Interval ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: The phase 3 GIMEMA-MMY-3006 study comparing bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) vs. thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) provided demonstration of superior CR/nCR rates after induction (the primary study endpoint) and across all subsequent treatment phases, a gain which translated into significantly longer PFS for patients randomized to the VTD arm (Cavo, Lancet 2010; Blood 2012). We herein report an updated analysis of the study with a focus on PFS2, time to second anti-myeloma therapy, treatment-free interval, post-relapse OS and long term outcomes. Methods: Overall, 474 patients were included in the trial. After a median follow up of 65 months, 251 patients (53%) have progressed and of these 221 (88%) had available data on salvage therapy after relapse. Results: On an intention-to-treat basis, median PFS was 57 months for patients randomized to the VTD arm as compared to 42 months for those assigned in the TD arm (HR 0.67; p=0.001). No statistically significant difference in 5-years estimates of OS was observed between VTD and TD groups (80% vs 73%). PFS2, defined as the time from initial randomization to second disease progression or death from any cause, was significantly longer for patients randomised to VTD than for those in the TD group (76% vs. 63% at 5 years, respectively; HR 0.64, p=0.009). Globally, 73% and 83% of patients in the VTD and TD arms required the start of salvage therapy due to symptomatic relapse. Median time to subsequent anti-myeloma therapy (defined as the interval between start of induction treatment and the first dose of second-line therapy) was significantly longer for patients assigned to VTD than for those who experienced relapse in the TD cohort (40 vs 31 months, p=0.014). Similarly, median treatment-free interval (defined as the time between last administration of front-line therapy and start of salvage treatment) was 26 months in VTD group vs 16 months in TD arm (p=0.016). Most of the patients received a novel agent-containing salvage therapy, while 18% was treated with conventional chemotherapy. As expected, a greater percentage of patients in the TD arm were treated with second-line bortezomib-based combinations in comparison with those relapsing in the VTD arm (72% vs 46%, respectively, p=0.001). Within the VTD group, no statistically significant difference in PFS2 was seen regarding the use of bortezomib or an IMiD as (part of) second-line therapy (64 vs 57 months, respectively). Clinical benefit from primary randomization to VTD vs TD was also observed in terms of second PFS (defined as the interval between first and second progression) (HR 0.61, p=0.032). The median OS after relapse was 36 months for both TD and VTD groups. No differences in post relapse OS were observed for patients primarily assigned to VTD or TD who received a subsequent bortezomib-based salvage therapy. Conclusion: With an extended follow-up of approximately 5 years, VTD was superior to TD in terms of extended PFS2, time to subsequent anti-MM therapy and treatment-free interval. PFS2 was significantly longer for patients randomized to VTD, with no difference regardless of the use of bortezomib or an IMiD as part of second-line therapy. This finding, along with similar post-relapse OS values across the two groups, suggest that induction and consolidation therapy with VTD did not select the emergence of bortezomib- resistant clones at the time of relapse. Disclosures Palumbo: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria. Cavo:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharm.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Updated 6 Year Follow-Up Of The PRIMA Study Confirms The Benefit Of 2-Year Rituximab Maintenance In Follicular Lymphoma Patients Responding To Frontline Immunochemotherapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.509.509 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 509-509 ◽

Cited By ~ 56

Author(s):

Gilles Andre Salles ◽

John Francis Seymour ◽

Pierre Feugier ◽

Fritz Offner ◽

Armando Lopez-Guillermo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Rituximab Maintenance ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract The intergroup PRIMA Phase III study was designed to investigate the potential benefit of 2-years of rituximab maintenance in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) responding to one of three non-randomised first line immunochemotherapy treatments. The results of the final analysis with 36 months follow-up (Salles et al., Lancet 2011) demonstrated a significant reduction of the risk of progression or death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 in favour of patients randomized to rituximab maintenance. We present here the updated results with 3 additional years of follow-up. From December 2004 until April 2007, 1217 patients were enrolled from 223 centres and complete data were available for 1193 patients who had the following pre-induction treatment characteristics: median age 56 years [range 22–87]; 52% male; 90% Ann Arbor stage III-IV; 33% B symptoms; 56% bone marrow involvement; 4% ECOG performance status >1; 34% elevated LDH; 32% β2-microglobulin >3mg/L; FLIPI score 0-1 (21%), FLIPI 2 (36%), FLIPI 3-5 (43%). Most patients (75%) received R-CHOP induction (22% R-CVP, 3% R-FCM). Patients responding to induction therapy were stratified based on their immunochemotherapy regimen and response [CR/CRu versus PR] and randomized to observation or rituximab maintenance, 1 infusion (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for 2 years. A total of 1018 randomised patients were analyzed according to the ITT principle (513 observation / 505 rituximab maintenance). All initial pre-treatment characteristics were well balanced between arms and the response status at time of randomization was CR=39%; CRu=32% and PR=28% (others 1%). With a median follow-up of 73 months from randomization, 6-year progression free survival estimate was 42.7% (95% CI 38 – 46.9%) in the observation arm (284 events, median=48 months) and 59.2% (95% CI 54.7 – 63.7%) in the rituximab maintenance arm (194 events, median not reached), respectively (stratified Log-Rank, P<. 0001; HR = 0.58 ; 95% CI 0.48 - 0.69). In pre-planned analyses of patients subgroups categorized by age, sex, FLIPI score category, induction chemotherapy and response to induction, the effect of rituximab maintenance was examined and found to be consistent among these different subgroups. In a Cox regression multivariate analysis, rituximab maintenance (HR=0.57; P<.0001) as well as older age (HR=0.79; P=.015), female sex (HR=0.72; P=.0003) and low or intermediate FLIPI groups (HR=0.67; P<.0001) were all significant variables associated with superior progression free survival. A significant reduction in the risk of starting a new anti-lymphoma treatment (HR=0.63, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.76) or starting a new chemotherapy (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 - 0.86) were also observed for rituximab maintenance. The rate of histological transformation did not appear to differ between the 2 treatment arms: in the observation arm, transformation was documented in 24 patients (114 cases with morphological documentation out of 278 progressions) versus 16 patients in the rituximab maintenance arm (80 out of 186) respectively. Overall response rate to second-line therapy was reported by investigators to be 180/227 (79%) in patients from the observation arm (CR/CRu=61%; PR=19%) versus 109/144 (76%) in patients from the rituximab maintenance arm (CR/CRu =51%; PR=22%) (P=NS). At the time of the data cut-off, overall survival (OS) remains favourable in both study arms: 58 patients (11.3%) have died in the observation arm (6-years OS estimate 88.7%) compared to 59 patients (11.7%) in the rituximab maintenance arm (6-year OS estimate 87,4%). Main causes documented for death in the observation and rituximab maintenance arm respectively were lymphoma (28 ; 28), other malignancy (19 ; 5) and infections (4 ; 7). No new significant safety data were captured with this additional follow-up period. In conclusion, with 3 additional years of follow-up, these data demonstrate a sustained and persistent benefit of 2 years of rituximab maintenance therapy after immunochemotherapy, resulting in improved progression free survival. No additional or unexpected long term toxicities were observed and second line therapy efficacy results did not significantly differ between the 2 study arms. Overall survival appears very favourable for these randomized patients. Disclosures: Salles: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, Travel support Other; Genetech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feugier:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Offner:Lilly: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lopez-Guillermo:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Belada:Roche: Consultancy. Catalano:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haioun:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Simpson:Janssen Research & Development: Honoraria. Leppa:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel support Other. Soubeyran:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hagenbeek:Takeda/Millennium: Consultancy. Casasnovas:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Coiffier:Millennium Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy. Tilly:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The efficacy of anti-PD-1 combined with temozolomide in unresectable, advanced melanoma from one center.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e22007 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e22007-e22007

Author(s):

Tu Hu ◽

Wei Sun ◽

Yu Xu ◽

Zhi-Guo Luo ◽

Yong Chen

Keyword(s):

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advanced Melanoma ◽

Unknown Primary ◽

Second Line ◽

Front Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Free Survival ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference

e22007 Background: Anti-PD1/PDL-1 immunotherapy has led to a new era of the unresectable, advanced melanoma treatment. However, there are still a significant part of patients suffer from primary or secondary drug resistance to immunotherapy. We sought to explore the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 plus Temozolomide in unresectable, advanced melanoma patients. Methods: Patients with unresectable, advanced melanoma were treated with anti-PD-1 plus Temozolomide, Temozolomide/DTIC based chemotherapy, or anti-PD-1 alone between 1 May, 2018 and 31 January, 2020. Data were retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed for best ORR and progression free survival, as well as toxicities. Results: Seventy-seven individuals were identified, including 37 (48.1%) with acral melanoma, 20 (26.0%) with cutaneous melanoma, 16 (20.8%) with mucosal melanoma and 4 (5.2%) with melanoma of unknown primary. Thirty-three (46.8%) patients had received postoperative adjuvant treatment before progression, and none of them had received anti-PD-1 treatment. The objective response rate of anti-PD-1 plus Temozolomide (n = 5, 41.7%) was higher than Temozolomide/DTIC (n = 1, 5%) or anti-PD-1 alone (n = 6, 20.7%) in the front-line therapy and second-line therapy (42.9%, 0%, 23.5%, respectively). Similar results were found in the third-line therapy. Although no significant difference was detected among these groups in the front-line therapy, the progression free survival of anti-PD-1 plus Temozolomide (median, 7 months) was higher than Temozolomide/DTIC (median, 2.5 months) (p = 0.009), while showing no significant difference with anti-PD-1 (median, 4.5 months) (p = 0.267) in the second-line therapy. The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was 8% (anti-PD-1 plus Temozolomide), 20.7% ( Temozolomide/DTIC) and 23.8% (anti-PD-1) respectively, mainly immunogenic pneumonia (0%, 0%, 10.3%) and hepatotoxicity (0%, 4.8%, 6.9%), and no significant difference was found among these groups. Conclusions: The efficacy of combination of anti-PD-1 and Temozolomide is better than Temozolomide/DTIC or anti-PD-1 alone in advanced melanoma and does not increase the toxicity. Therefore, Anti-PD-1 combined with Temozolomide may be used as front-line regimen in advanced melanoma.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) as Third Line Therapy In Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia In Chronic Phase Who Have Failed Two Prior TKIs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2274.2274 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2274-2274

Author(s):

Amr R Ibrahim ◽

Marco Bua ◽

Jamshid S Khorshad ◽

Dragana Milojkovic ◽

Lina Eliasson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

The Third ◽

Line Therapy ◽

History Of ◽

Third Line Therapy ◽

Third Line

Abstract Abstract 2274 Patients with CML in chronic phase who have failed imatinib therapy are commonly treated with dasatinib or nilotinib, but a significant proportion fail to respond or relapse in which case they are often treated with the other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that they had not yet received. We report here the largest series of CML patients in CP treated with a third line TKI after failing both imatinib and another TKI. We enrolled 26 patients. The median age was 64 years and 54% were male. 20 patients had received dasatinib and 6 nilotinib as second line therapy. All patients were still in first CP at the moment of commencing third line therapy, and none was harboring a T315I mutation. Failure to second line therapy was defined as no CHR at 3 months, no major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at 12 months or loss of a hematological or cytogenetic response. Patients who were unable to continue therapy on account of toxicity were also considered as having failed therapy. The median follow up for the surviving patients after starting third line therapy was 21.5 months (range, 6 – 46.5 months). The 2.5 years (30 months) cumulative incidences of MCyR, CCyR and MMR were 48.2%, 32.4%, 21.1% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the achievement of at least MiCyR (<95% Ph-positive) on imatinib (RR=5.6, p=0.03) or on second line therapy (RR=11.8, p=0.006) were the only independent predictors for the achievement of CCyR. When combining both variables we found that patients who had achieved MiCyR on one of the two prior therapies had a significantly better OS and higher probability of achieving cytogenetic response on third line therapy, i.e. the 30 month probability of OS and CCyR were 72.7% vs 20.4% (p=0.03) and of 71.4% vs 0% (p=0.0005) respectively (Figure). During follow up 9 (34.6%) patients died. The probability of OS at 30 months was 46.7%. The achievement of a cytogenetic response on second line and age younger than 64 (possibly reflecting eligibility for transplantation) were the only independent predictors for OS (RR=6.5, p=0.02 and RR=0.13, p= 0.02). Seventeen patients (65%) were classified as intolerant to previous therapies (imatinib or second line TKI). Intolerant patients had a probability of responding to the third line therapy similar to those of the resistant patients, but when this cohort was subdivided according to the type of intolerance we found that 11 patients who had hematologic toxicity with either therapy had a probability of CCyR at 30 months lower than that of the remaining 15 patients (11.1% vs 47.5 %, p=0.03), while the 8 patients with non-hematologic intolerance to the imatinib or to the second line had a probability of 30-month CCyR greater than that of the remaining 18 patients (87.5% vs 5.6%, p<0.001). At 3 months 26 patients remained on follow up, of whom 9 patients had achieved at least MiCyR. These 9 patients had better 30-month probabilities of CCyR and OS than the patients who had failed to achieve MiCyR, namely 88.9% vs 13.3% (p<0.0001), and 87.5% vs. 35.0% (p=0.1). When we excluded the only patient who died of non-leukemia related causes while in CCyR, the probabilities of OS was 100% vs 35.0% (p=0.04) Which patients should be offered third line TKI therapy? Patients who achieved cytogenetic response on first or second line therapy and patients with a history of non-hematologic intolerance to the prior TKI benefited from a third TKI. Patients with primary cytogenetic resistance to two TKIs or with a history of hematologic intolerance should receive an allogeneic stem cell transplant when possible. For patients in this situation who lack a transplant option we would recommend only a short course (3 months) of the third line therapy to identify responders. Non-responders should be offered experimental studies. Disclosures: Marin: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Toxicity of Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening ◽

10.2174/1386207322666190119162352 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 21 (10) ◽

pp. 718-724 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Wen-Cong Ruan ◽

Yue-Ping Che ◽

Li Ding ◽

Hai-Feng Li

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Adverse Event ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Clinical Prognosis ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.

Download Full-text

Relapse After Early-Stage, Favorable Hodgkin Lymphoma: Disease Characteristics and Outcomes With Conventional or High-Dose Chemotherapy

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.20.00947 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (2) ◽

pp. 107-115

Author(s):

Paul J. Bröckelmann ◽

Horst Müller ◽

Teresa Guhl ◽

Karolin Behringer ◽

Michael Fuchs ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Early Stage ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

High Dose ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

First Diagnosis

PURPOSE We evaluated disease and treatment characteristics of patients with relapse after risk-adapted first-line treatment of early-stage, favorable, classic Hodgkin lymphoma (ES-HL). We compared second-line therapy with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or conventional chemotherapy (CTx). METHODS We analyzed patients with relapse after ES-HL treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD10+HD13 trials. We compared, by Cox proportional hazards regression, progression-free survival (PFS) after relapse (second PFS) treated with either ASCT or CTx and performed sensitivity analyses with overall survival (OS) from relapse and Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS A total of 174 patients’ disease relapsed after treatment in the HD10 (n = 53) and HD13 (n = 121) trials. Relapse mostly occurred > 12 months after first diagnosis, predominantly with stage I-II disease. Of 172 patients with known second-line therapy, 85 received CTx (49%); 70, ASCT (41%); 11, radiotherapy only (6%); and 4, palliative single agent therapies (2%). CTx was predominantly bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP [68%]), followed by the combination regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (19%), or other regimens (13%). Patients aged > 60 years at relapse had shorter second PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.0; P = .0029) and were mostly treated with CTx (n = 33 of 49; 67%) and rarely with ASCT (n = 8; 16%). After adjustment for age and a disadvantage of ASCT after the more historic HD10 trial, we did not observe a significant difference in the efficacy of CTx versus ASCT for second PFS (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.6; P = .39). In patients in the HD13 trial who were aged ≤ 60 years, the 2-year, second PFS rate was 94.0% with CTx (95% CI, 85.7% to 100%) versus 83.3% with ASCT (95% CI, 71.8% to 94.8%). Additional sensitivity analyses including OS confirmed these observations. CONCLUSION After contemporary treatment of ES-HL, relapse mostly occurred > 12 months after first diagnosis. Polychemotherapy regimens such as BEACOPP are frequently administered and may constitute a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with relapse after ES-HL.

Download Full-text

1338. Analysis of Prescription Guideline Adherence in Pediatric Outpatient Pneumonia Treatment

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1520 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S680-S681

Author(s):

Carly Heck ◽

Judith Martin ◽

Marcia Kurs-Lasky

Keyword(s):

Drug Allergy ◽

Health Concern ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Comparison Results ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Recommended Therapy

Abstract Background Background: Antibiotic resistance is a major public health concern. A modifiable intervention is outpatient antibiotic stewardship. The goal of this study was to review the electronic health records (EHR) of children diagnosed with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) to compare patients who received non-guideline concordant therapy with those prescribed recommended therapy. Methods Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 300 children (6 months to 6 years old) with an outpatient diagnosis of CAP between July 2017 and June 2019. 45 Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) and UPMC Children’s Community Pediatrics (CCP) practices were included. CHP practices are academic-based with trainees involved in visits, while CCP practices do not include trainees. First-line recommended therapy was defined as amoxicillin, second-line therapy as azithromycin or amoxicillin-clavulanate, and all other prescriptions were defined as other. Patients prescribed first-line therapy were compared to patients with second-line therapy or other. If first-line therapy was not prescribed, the EHR was manually reviewed for justification. If drug allergy was listed, the medication allergy and type of reaction were recorded. Results Results: In this study the minority of children (43%) were prescribed first-line therapy. This group was younger (57 vs. 63 months of age), more likely to be Non-white (80%), and seen at the CHP locations than those prescribed non-guideline concordant therapy. The average symptom duration was shorter, heart rate and respiratory rate were higher and the presence of fever was more common in the first-line therapy group. Justification for non-guideline therapy was most often reported as to provide coverage for atypical organisms. The most common drug allergy recorded was amoxicillin, and urticaria with unknown timing was the most common type of reaction. Demographics Comparison Results Justification for Second-line / Other Therapy and Drug Allergy Results Conclusion This project observed a high proportion of children being prescribed non-guideline concordant therapy for a diagnosis of CAP. Age, race, practice location, and severity of illness measures showed a statistically significant difference between groups. This study highlights the importance of education which reviews the current guidelines and the most likely pathogens for children with CAP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Determining the efficiency of the Imatinib mesylate and monitoring of relapse and emergence of IM resistance in Algerian adult patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

South Asian Journal of Experimental Biology ◽

10.38150/sajeb.8(3).p103-108 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 103-108

Author(s):

Amel Sebaa ◽

Mustapha Diaf ◽

Sakina Cherif Touil

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia ◽

Myeloid Leukaemia ◽

Imatinib Mesylate ◽

Second Generation ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference

Imatinib mesylate (IM) shows remarkable clinical activity in patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML). Patients who fail to respond to IM or those who lose their response should be treated with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of the Indian IM generic (Imatib*CIPLA), and to monitor relapse and emergence of IM resistance. Two hundred and seven adult patients from the Northwestern region of Algeria were diagnosed as CML in chronic phase (CP) and were treated with an Indian generic of IM at 400 mg/day. The IM 600 mg treatment and second-line therapy were prescribed after failure of treatment. Molecular Analysis was performed and BCR-ABL/ABL ratios were determined and standardised according to the international scale using 0.47 as conversion factor. Our findings showed a significant difference in major molecular response (MMR) for patients treated with IM 600 mg compared to IM 400 mg (51.7% vs. 37.6%, p<0.001). In the second line therapy group, there was a significant improvement of MR4.5 compared to the IM group (7.7% vs. 32.6%, p=0.039). Likewise, no significant relationship was found between the median duration of second-generation TKIs deep response and IM 400 mg/day regarding the MR4 (11 vs. 26.5 months, p=0.107) and MR4.5 (20 vs. 32.5 months, p=0.203). The Indian IM generic molecule (Imatib*CIPLA), has shown its efficiency in achieving major and deep molecular responses. Patients treated with the second-generation TKIs showed deep molecular responses with fewer relapses in a shorter median time than those treated with IM.

Download Full-text

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with metastatic cervical cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.51 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽

pp. 51-51

Author(s):

Xiaoyun Pan ◽

Lincy S. Lal ◽

John White ◽

Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour ◽

Christian Valencia

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Economic Burden ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

Line Therapy

51 Background: In 2021, 14,480 patients are estimated to be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the US; 16% of patients are expected to have metastatic disease for whom the 5-year survival rate is 17.6% per SEER estimates. Patients with metastatic cervical cancer (mCC) are treated mainly with systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, demographics, treatment patterns, and economic burden of patients with mCC receiving systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible women had been diagnosed with cervical cancer, as evidenced by >2 outpatient or >1 inpatient claim in the Optum Research Database from January 2014 through January 2020. Patients were included if they had metastasis within 6 months before or after cervical cancer diagnosis, with evidence of systemic treatment on or after the latter of a claim date for cervical cancer disease or metastatic disease. The index date was the first-line treatment initiation date. Patients were required to have ≥6 months of pre-index continuous enrollment. The top 3 treatment regimens and median treatment duration by line of therapy were described. All-cause per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs (2019 US dollars), including plan and patient paid amounts, were reported for full follow-up period from first-line and second-line therapy initiation. Results: The study sample consisted of 778 patients (mean age, 59 years; commercial, 58%; Medicare Advantage, 42%). The mean (median) follow-up period was 14 (9) months. Top baseline comorbidities were diseases of the urinary system (71%) and diseases of the female genital organs (70%), and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 7. In the first line, 80% of patients received platinum-based therapy and 23% received bevacizumab (bev). Of 778 patients, only 294 (38%) received second-line therapy, with 34% receiving bev. Top first-line treatment regimens were carboplatin + paclitaxel (27%), cisplatin (21%), and bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (10%); the median (95% CI) duration of treatment was 3.4 (3.1-3.7) months. Top second-line treatment regimens were bev + carboplatin + paclitaxel (13%), carboplatin + paclitaxel (11%), and pembrolizumab (6%); the median duration of treatment was 3.8 (3.1-4.2) months. Mean all-cause total PPPM costs were $19,519 from first-line and $22,660 second-line therapy initiation (table). Conclusions: This study indicates that real-world mCC patients have short treatment durations and significant economic burden with first-line and second-line therapy. Novel therapies associated with greater clinical benefits in patients with mCC may provide economic benefit.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text