scholarly journals With Equal-Access, Service Members with Lymphoma Have Better Outcomes Than Their Civilian Counterparts

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4090-4090
Author(s):  
Gilbert Patrick Ancira ◽  
Joshua Romain ◽  
Jennifer Thornton ◽  
Christin Blair Destefano

Abstract Introduction: The Military Health System (MHS) is a single-payer, equal-access healthcare system that provides healthcare to 1.4 million active-duty service members (ADSMs) from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. ADSMs with cancer receive prompt care without copayments, deductibles, prior authorizations, or other insurance barriers. Lymphoma is the most common hematologic malignancy diagnosed in ADSMs. We sought to compare overall survival (OS) of ADSMs with lymphoma with matched civilian lymphoma patients. We also sought to identify variables among ADSMs that predicted OS. Methods: The Department of Defense Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR) was retrospectively accessed to identify ADSMs with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and indolent lymphomas over a 20-year span from 1997-2017. A comparator arm was created from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER)-18 database and was matched in a 4:1 ratio by age, sex, race, ethnicity, year of diagnosis, and stage. OS was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan Meier curves were constructed and compared using log rank tests. Among ADSMs, univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess OS based on race, ethnicity, sex, age at diagnosis, stage, year of diagnosis, rank, branch of service, and geographic region at diagnosis. All data analyses were conducted using STATA/SE 15.1 for Windows; the alpha level for statistical significance was set to 0.05. Results: There were 1,170 ADSMs with HL, 443 with DLBCL, and 284 with indolent lymphomas identified from ACTUR. Most ADSMs were between ages 20-40, white/non-Hispanic, enlisted, and in the Army. All three groups of ADSMs had superior OS when compared with their matched civilian counterparts. There were 49%, 48%, and 35% reductions in the risk of death among ADSMs with DLBCL, indolent lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively (DLBCL hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.65, p<0.0001; indolent HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.81, p <0.002; HL HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.82, p <0.002). Among the ADSMs, variables that reached statistical significance in the univariate and/or the multivariable analyses for OS include increasing age (DLBCL, indolent), advanced stage (DLBCL, HL), and geographic residence at diagnosis (DLBCL, HL). Notably, there were no statistically significant differences in OS based on race, ethnicity, sex, rank, or branch of service. Discussion: ADSMs with lymphoma treated within the MHS have significantly better survival than their matched civilian counterparts. Further, disparities based on race/ethnicity and sex are not present in the MHS, despite being pervasive in the civilian sector. It is possible that better access to care within the equal-access MHS might explain our results. Alternatively, regular fitness tests and periodic health assessments may render ADSMs are more fit and less comorbid than their civilian counterparts, translating to a better chance of long-term survival. Although this study is limited by its retrospective design and possible coding inaccuracies, the finding of advanced age and stage impacting OS serves as a good internal control and confirms the quality of ACTUR data. Findings from this study reflect favorably on ADSMs with cancer. The absence of racial/ethnic or gender disparities reflects favorably on cancer care received within the equal-access MHS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Thornton: Undisclosed Companies: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4868-4868
Author(s):  
Vivek Kumar ◽  
Taimur Sher ◽  
Vivek Roy ◽  
Prakash Vishnu ◽  
Anne M Hazen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Racial disparities in outcomes of cancer patients have been reported. Access to comprehensive cancer centers is associated with improved overall survival (OS) but racial/ethnic minorities may have a disparate access to such care. While the impact of treatment facility volume on outcomes has been evaluated, outcomes of centers with minority-predominant patient population have not been studied. We compared demographic profiles, facility level data and OS of patients treated at minority-predominant facilities to facilities that treated predominantly non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) with non-DLBCL. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify all non-DLBCL patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. "Minority-treating facilities" were defined as facilities in the top decile by proportion for initial treatment of non-Hispanic African-Americans (NHAA), Hispanics and other races. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to compare sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing outcomes between minority treating and non-minority treating facilities. A subgroup analysis stratified by race/ethnicity was also conducted to study the effect of treating facilities on the outcome of NHWs and minorities separately. Results: Of 1339 total facilities, 123 (9.1%) qualified as minority treating. Of 207,239 eligible patients in NCDB, 18,719 (9.03%) received treatment at the minority-treating facilities and of these, 11,190 (~60%) belonged to the minority races. Overall, 4.5% (6,988/156,664) NHWs and 30% (11,190/37,639) minorities received treatment at the minority-treating facilities. Several demographic and facility level characteristics were significantly different among the patients treated at minority-treating facilities as compared to non-minority treating facilities. Overall, significantly higher number of patients in minority-treating hospitals had lower income and education, had Medicaid coverage or lack of insurance. The OS of patients in minority treating facilities was significantly worse as compared to non-minority facilities (Figures). On multivariate analysis, patients who received treatment at minority-treating facilities were at 10% (HR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.14 p<0.001) higher risk of mortality as compared to those treated at the non-minority treating facilities. On multivariate analysis, NHAA (30% increased risk) and 'other races' (9% increased risk) were at significantly higher risk of mortality as compared to the NHW (Table 2). To study the effect of treatment at minority-treating facilities on OS among the patients of same race/ethnicity group, a multivariate analysis was also run separately for NHW and racial minorities. The NHWs who received treatment at minority-treating facilities were at 13% higher risk of death (HR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.08-1.19 p<0.001) as compared to NHWs who were treated at non-minority treating facilities. Similarly, the racial minorities who received treatment at minority treating facilities were at 8% higher risk of death (HR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19 p=0.003) as compared to those who received treatment at the nonminority treating facilities. Conclusions:Outcomes of patients who received treatment at minority treating facilities was significantly worse than those at non-minority treating facilities. This was true for NHWs and racial minorities separately as well. Several demographic and facility level characteristics were significantly different in the two groups however OS remained worse after adjusting for them. Causes of poor outcomes at minority-treating facilities must be analyzed to mitigate them and improve outcomes for all. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilja Kalashnikov ◽  
Tomas Tanskanen ◽  
Janne Pitkäniemi ◽  
Nea Malila ◽  
Sirkku Jyrkkiö ◽  
...  

AbstractNodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare B-cell malignancy associated with excellent survival. However, some patients experience histological transformation into aggressive large B-cell lymphoma. Population-based data on transformation in patients with NLPHL is limited. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to estimate the risk of transformation and relative survival in patients diagnosed with NLPHL in Finland between 1995 and 2018. We identified a total of 453 patients (median age, 48 years; 76% males) with the incident NLPHL from the Finnish Cancer Registry. The cumulative incidence of transformation was 6.3% (95% CI, 4.2-9.6) at 10 years. After adjusting for sex, age and year of diagnosis, transformation was associated with a substantially increased risk of death (HR 8.55, 95% CI 4.49−16.3). Ten-year relative survival was 94% (95% CI, 89%‒100%). The patients diagnosed at a later calendar year had lower excess risk of death (HR, 0.38 per 10-year increase; 95% CI, 0.15‒0.98). We conclude that while the 10-year relative survival for the patients with NLPHL was excellent in this large population-based cohort for the entire study period, transformation resulted in a substantially increased mortality compared with the patients without transformation. Our results also suggest a reduction in excess mortality over time.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2398-2398
Author(s):  
Michael J. Fulham ◽  
Melinda Gibson ◽  
Judith Trotman ◽  
Cecily Forsyth ◽  
Ilona Cunningham ◽  
...  

Abstract Despite the utilization of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the evaluation of the lymphomas there are limited data on the role of PET-CT in staging and management of previously untreated HL and NHL. In this study we analysed the impact of PET-CT in 465 consecutive patients (223 females, 242 males; mean age = 52 years) who were scanned between June 2003 and June 2006. All scans were carried out on an LSO Biograph Duo PET-CT scanner. FDG isotope dose and scanning parameters were identical for all patients and scans; contrast was not given. PET-CT scans were read without access to histology or other imaging. Histology was HL (n=105) and NHL (n=360). In HL nodular sclerosing comprised 50% and in NHL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma accounted for 44% and follicular lymphoma 30%. Referring doctors were asked to provide the clinical stage, results of other investigations and the management plan prior to the scan. After the PET-CT scan they were asked for a revised clinical stage and management plan based on the PET-CT. Pre- and post-staging and management plans were compared. The analysis was retrospective in 176 and prospective in 289 patients. There were 81 Referring Doctors; 83% were Hemato-Oncologists. The PET-CT scans showed no abnormalities in 45 patients (5 HL, 40 NHL): 40 where the only site of disease was resected, and 5 where lesions were beyond the scanner resolution (1 conjunctival MALT, 4 cutaneous NHL); all were included in the analysis. Pre- and post PET-CT staging data were obtained in all 465 patients. PET-CT altered staging in 168 (36%) patients (38 HL, 130 NHL). Up-staging was seen in 149 (36 HL, 113 NHL), down-staging in 19 (2 HL, 17 NHL). Overall aggressive lymphomas showed markedly increased FDG uptake and there was only mild to moderately increased FDG uptake in most indolent lymphomas. FDG uptake, using Standard Uptake Values (SUVs), was defined as marked if SUV was >8, moderate if the SUV was between 4–8, and mild if the SUV was <4. FDG uptake was not uniform across all the lesions identified in many patients and there was heterogeneous uptake. We defined heterogeneity as focal regions of abnormal FDG uptake, which varied from mild to moderate or marked within the same patient. Heterogeneous FDG uptake was seen in 51% of HL and 40% of NHL patients, which was independent of the size of the lesions. In NHL this heterogeneity was seen in 48% of patients with indolent histology. Pre and Post PET-CT management plans were obtained in 417 (89%); the 48 patients without a management plan were excluded from further analysis. Management was changed in 117 (28%) patients (20 HL, 97 NHL); this comprised 55/149 (37%) patients who were upstaged, 56/297 (19%) patients where staging was unchanged and 6/19 (32%) patients who were downstaged. Where staging was unchanged, the altered management related to delineation of limited or more extensive disease on PET-CT in 54%. These results indicate that heterogeneity, independent of lesion size is common, in indolent lymphomas and may reflect different biological behaviour. Further, in the largest PET-CT cohort yet reported, PET-CT improves primary staging in HL and NHL and referrers appear to alter management based on these data.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1954-1954
Author(s):  
James M. Foran ◽  
Laura A. McClure ◽  
Christina A. Clarke ◽  
Theresa H. M. Keegan

Abstract Abstract 1954 Poster Board I-977 Introduction: Despite advances in treatment and a well-characterized prognostic index, significant heterogeneity remains in DLBCL survival. Preliminary data suggest a potential survival disparity based on race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status (SES). To evaluate the impact of these and other variables on survival we performed an analysis in the ethnically diverse population-based California Cancer Registry (CCR). We utilized Neighborhood SES, an index of 7 census measures of education, income, occupation & cost of living, based on the residential census-block group at diagnosis. Each census-block group comprises ∼1500 residents. Neighborhood SES has been shown to be significantly associated with survival after Follicular Lymphoma (JCO 27:3044, 2009). Methods: All pts with DLBCL (ICD-O-3 codes 9680 & 9684) diagnosed from Jan 1988 to Dec 2007 and reported to CCR were included in the analysis, including n=16,892 diagnosed from 1988-2000, and n=11,916 from 2001-2007 (total study pop'n =28,808). HIV/AIDS pts were excluded, as were n=63 with Mediastinal LBCL & n=10 with primary effusion lymphoma. The mean age was 63 yrs, and the cohort was 53% male. Between time periods, there was a relative increase in Hispanic pts [15.4% (1988-2000) to 20.8% (2001-2007), p<0.001], and a 4% increase in advanced stage from 42% (1988-2000) to 46% (2001-2007) (p<0.001). Neighborhood SES was stratified into quintiles from lowest (SES-1) to highest (SES-5), the pt distribution was: SES-1, 14%; SES-2, 18%; SES-3, 21%; SES-4, 23%; and SES-5, 24%. To evaluate the impact of prognostic factors (particularly diagnosis period, SES, and race/ethnicity) on overall survival (OS) & disease-specific survival (DSS) we used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for death with 95% CI's. Multivariate regression models included variables significant at p<0.15 in univariate models or with a priori hypotheses for inclusion. Results are presented by stage at diagnosis [Localized/Regional (LocReg) vs. Advanced (ADV)]. Results: There was a significant improvement in OS in patients diagnosed after 2001 for both LocReg (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.82-0.91, p<0.001) and ADV stage (HR 0.69, 95%CI 0.66-0.72, p<0.001), which correlates with the introduction of rituximab into therapy for DLBCL. As expected, age >60 years was associated with a significantly worse OS for LocReg (HR 3.06, 95%CI 2.90-3.24) and ADV stage (2.02, 95%CI 1.93-2.12). Females also had significantly better OS compared with males (Loc-Reg - HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.86-0.94; ADV - HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.85-0.93). There was no significant impact of race/ethnicity on survival with the exception of non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders (NH A/PI) with ADV stage, for whom OS was significantly inferior compared with whites (HR 1.18, 95%CI 1.09-1.27, p<0.001). Compared with the highest quintile (SES-5), there was a significant effect of lower neighborhood SES on OS and DSS (see Table). Conclusion: There has been a significant improvement in survival after DLBCL since 2001, but patients in the lowest SES-1 quintile have a 34% higher risk of death from any cause and 20% higher risk for death from lymphoma than those in the highest SES-5. In this model, race/ethnicity did not have a significant impact on survival with the exception of NH A/PI with ADV stage. Studies to understand and address these socioeconomic disparities are urgently required in order to extend the improvements in DLBCL survival more effectively. Disclosures: Foran: Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 703-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorne Lionel Biccler ◽  
Ingrid Glimelius ◽  
Sandra Eloranta ◽  
Knut B. Smeland ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Estimates of short- and long-term survival for young patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are of considerable interest. We investigated cHL prognosis in the era of contemporary treatment at different milestones during the follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS On the basis of a Nordic cohort of 2,582 patients diagnosed at ages 18 to 49 years between 2000 and 2013, 5-year relapse risks and 5-year restricted losses in expectation of lifetime were estimated for all patients and for patients who achieved event-free survival (EFS) for 12 (EFS12), 24 (EFS24), 36 (EFS36) or 60 (EFS60) months. The median follow-up time was 9 years (range, 2.9 to 16.8 years). RESULTS The 5-year overall survival was 95% (95% CI, 94% to 96%). The 5-year risk of relapse was 13.4% (95% CI, 12.1% to 14.8%) overall but decreased to 4.2% (95% CI, 3.8% to 4.6%) given that patients reached EFS24. Relapse risk for patients treated with six to eight courses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) was comparable to that of patients treated with six to eight courses of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) despite more adverse risk criteria among patients treated with BEACOPP. Both from diagnosis and if EFS24 was reached, the losses in expectation of lifetime during the following 5 years were small (from diagnosis, 45 days [95% CI, 35 to 54 days] and for patients who reached EFS24, 13 days [95% CI, 7 to 20 days]). In stage-stratified analyses of 5-year restricted loss in expectation of lifetime, patients with stages I to IIA disease had no noteworthy excess risk of death after they reached EFS24, whereas risk remained measurable for patients with stages IIB to IV cHL. CONCLUSION Real-world data on young patients with cHL from the Nordic countries show excellent outcomes. The outlook is particularly favorable for patients who reach EFS24, which supports limited relapse-oriented clinical follow-up.


Chemotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Appio ◽  
Carlo Landoni ◽  
Maria La Targia ◽  
Vanda Bertolli ◽  
Martina Chiarucci ◽  
...  

Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with poor long-term survival after relapse or resistance to chemotherapy. We report a case of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma refractory to first-line R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and second-line R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin) chemotherapy treatments. The patient achieved remission with single-agent pixantrone, and received a consolidation with high-dose BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. He received consolidation radiotherapy on the site of bulky disease. At 20 months from transplant, the disease is in continuous complete remission. The successful use of pixantrone as a bridge to transplant is highlighted, together with the absence of serious side effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072095853
Author(s):  
Chen-Xin Liu ◽  
Tian-Qi Xu ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Pan-Pan Wang ◽  
Chun Cao ◽  
...  

Background: Primary lymphoma of bone (PLB) is an extremely rare malignancy arising in the skeletal system. There is no consensus over the best definition of PLB. Most of the published articles are single-institutional retrospective studies with a limited sample size. The rarity of PLB and discrepancies on diagnostic criteria has resulted in a vague understanding of PLB. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of 2558 PLB patients who were registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2016. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The effects of various factors on survival outcomes were analyzed by using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted by using the Cox proportional hazards model to determine independent prognostic factors. Results: The median follow-up time of all eligible patients was 58 months. There seemed no sex preponderance in PLB incidence. The most involved sites are axial skeletons. The most common histological subtype was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The 3-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.70%, 65.70%, 54.40% and 39.50%, respectively. PLB patients whose primary tumor sites were appendicular and craniofacial skeletons had a significant survival advantage [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.694, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.552–0.872; HR = 0.729, 95% CI 0.597–0.889, respectively] over those with axial skeletons as primary tumor sites. Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)–mature B-cell lymphoma, and NHL-precursor-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma also had a significant OS advantage (HR = 0.392, 95% CI 0.200–0.771; HR = 0.826, 95% CI 0.700–0.973; and HR = 0.453, 95% CI 0.223–0.923, respectively). Patients with Ann Arbor stage III–IV at diagnosis were at higher risk of death than those with stage I–II (HR = 1.348, 95% CI 1.107–1.641). Chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR = 0.734, 95% CI 0.605–0.890). Conclusions: Primary anatomic site, histology type, higher Ann Arbor stage and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Chemotherapy played a pivotal role in PLB treatment.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2191-2191
Author(s):  
Justine M. Kahn ◽  
Fran Maguire ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Elysia Alvarez ◽  
Theresa H.M. Keegan

Introduction: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is one of the most treatable cancers affecting adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (15 - 39 years), however optimal therapy for de novo disease in this population remains a subject of debate. Population-based studies in HL consistently report a survival disadvantage for AYAs when compared with younger patients. Though the etiology of these disparities is unclear, analyses of clinical trials data suggest that observed survival differences may relate to treatment, rather than to age. Because registry analyses are often limited by lack of information about clinical characteristics and therapeutic exposures, the independent effect of age on HL-outcome outside of the cooperative group setting is unknown. To address this gap in the literature, we: (1) examined initial treatment regimen and patterns of care in a population-based cohort of AYAs compared to children with de novo HL, and (2) examined the impact of sociodemographic and clinical variables on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) by age, after adjusting for therapy. Methods: Data for 4,426 patients aged 0 - 39 years diagnosed with classical HL between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the California Cancer Registry (CCR). Detailed treatment information for each patient was extracted from unstructured free-text fields in the CCR database. Chemotherapy regimens were classified based on standard treatment approaches for adult and pediatric HL (Table). Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the influence of sociodemographic and clinical variables on OS and DSS, overall and by age group, and are presented as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Models were adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, insurance, neighborhood socioeconomic status, histology, stage, B symptoms, treatment location at a NCI (National Cancer Institute)-designated cancer center, and radiation therapy (RT). Results: Of the 4,426 patients in this cohort, 33% were <21 years (y) (N= 1,479) and 67% were 22 - 39y (N= 2,947). At median follow-up of 4.4 years, 3-year OS in the full cohort was 95%. Front-line therapy for patients with HL differed significantly across age groups (Table). Approximately 42% of patients <21y received ABVD vs. 69% of older patients. Compared with older patients, a higher proportion of younger patients received ABVE-PC (younger: 8.8% vs. <1%) and modified treatment regimens (younger: 24% vs. 9.6%). Regimens were considered modified if they omitted one drug from a standard protocol but were otherwise administered according to expected dosing schedules; the most common were ABV (18%) and AVD (15%). A higher proportion of patients with private (vs. public/no) insurance received STANFORD V chemotherapy. In total, 40% of patients aged <21y received RT as part of initial therapy vs. 27% of patients 22 - 39y. In survival models, increasing age was associated with a higher risk of death. Compared with patients <14y, the hazard of death from HL was over three-fold higher in patients 22 - 29y (aHR=3.1, CI: 1.1, 9.1) and 30 - 39y (aHR=3.8, CI: 1.3, 11.2). In multivariable models stratified by age, race/ethnicity, insurance, B-symptoms and stage were each significantly associated with survival. In patients <21y, NHBs (aHR: 7.1, CI: 2.4, 20.6) and Hispanics (aHR: 2.5, CI: 1.0, 6.4) experienced worse DSS than NHWs. Having public or no insurance also conferred worse OS (aHR: 1.9, CI: 1.1, 3.5), but initial therapy did not significantly impact OS or DSS. Among those aged 22 - 39y, NHB patients had worse OS (aHR: 1.7, CI: 1.0, 2.8) as did patients with public or no insurance (aHR: 1.7, CI: 1.2, 2.3). Stage IV disease was associated with inferior OS (aHR: 2.9, CI: 1.3, 6.8) and DSS (aHR: 3.3, CI: 1.1, 9.6). Finally, modified treatment regimens (vs. ABVD) were associated with worse OS (aHR: 1.6, CI: 1.0, 2.5), but did not significantly impact DSS in AYAs. Conclusion: In this large, population-based cohort of children and AYAs with HL, we observed that initial therapy varies, but that the majority of AYAs receive ABVD. Variation in therapy was largely insufficient to explain observed survival disparities, as older age, NHB and Hispanic race/ethnicity, and public or no insurance each conferred increased risk of death, even after adjustment for chemotherapy regimen. Further analyses examining comorbidities, treatment-related toxicities, and cause of death are ongoing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Alexander Manché ◽  
Aaron Casha ◽  
Liberato Camilleri

<p><strong>Background</strong></p><p>Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) has been linked to reduced long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. We studied the influence of age, PPM and indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) in this setting.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Methods</strong></p><p>Patients (n=586) subjected to aortic valve replacement were followed up for a mean of 7.8 years (maximum 20 years). The study population was divided into four equivalent groups according to age. Mortality data was extracted from the National Statistics database. Data pertaining to patient body surface area and valve effective orifice area was collected prospectively and mismatch (moderate or severe) was defined according to established values. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to study the effect of age, mismatch and iEOA on survival. The Log Rank test was used to compare survival curves by age groups.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Results</strong></p><p>The incidence of moderate PPM was 24.6%, and of severe PPM 3.9%. Mismatch increased the hazard of death by 31.2% for moderate PPM and 70.3% for severe PPM but did not reach statistical significance. Mean age of patients with mismatch (n=167) was 2.52 years less than in those without (63.35±10.61 versus 65.87±11.69, p=0.016). Age significantly affected survival, increasing the risk of death by 7.3% for every incremental year. <em> </em>Mean iEOA was 0.94±0.15cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>; for every 0.1unit increase in iEOA the risk of death decreased by 8.8%.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p>Long-term survival was significantly affected by age at operation.  Although mismatch increased hazard of death the effect did not reach statistical significance. A larger iEOA had a significant beneficial effect on survival.<em></em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document