scholarly journals The Impact of EUTOS Long-Term Survival (ELTS) Score on Predicting Progression and Survival Among Turkish Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4600-4600
Author(s):  
Mert Bektaş ◽  
Tuğrul Elverdi ◽  
Ayşe Salihoğlu ◽  
Muhlis Cem Ar ◽  
Şeniz Öngören ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Sokal Score

Abstract Introduction and Objectives: For patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), four baseline prognostic scores are commonly used including the Sokal score and the most recently introduced EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score. The ELTS score was shown to be superior to the Sokal score for predicting survival. The aim of the study is to evaluate the value of ELTS score on predicting disease progression and survival in Turkish pts with CML-CP. Material and Method: Demographic, laboratory and clinical features, disease responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and survival of CML-CP pts, who received upfront imatinib (IM) between 2003 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment responses were reevaluated according to European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations. Risk groups analysis, discrimination and hazard ratios (HRs) were evaluated with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to examine the effects of scores on predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 185 pts were included, of which 103 (55.7%) were male and median age was 47 years (range, 16 - 81 years) (Table 1). The percentages of pts with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk ELTS scores were 60.5%, 25.9%, and 13.5%, respectively. For the Sokal score, these percentages were 37.3%, 40.5%, and 22.2% respectively. For Sokal high-risk pts, only 46.3% were classified as high-risk according to the ELTS score. Similarly, 44% of pts with intermediate Sokal risk had low-risk ELTS score (Fig. 1). Seventy-seven pts (41.6%) had at least one comorbidity, and the most common comorbidities were hypertension (21.6%), diabetes mellitus (13%), and ischemic heart disease (12.4%) (Table 1). The median durations of IM therapy and follow-up were 2728 (range, 14 - 6320 days) and 3473 (range, 71 - 6320 days) days, respectively. Complete hematologic and early molecular (BCR-ABL1 IS <10% at 3 months) responses at 3 months were 95.6% and 75.9%, respectively. Complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rates at 6 and 12 months were 72.3% and 86.1% and 45.4% and 54%, respectively. Thirty-five pts (18.9%) switched to second-generation TKI therapy and 6 pts (3.2%) progressed to advanced-phase disease during the follow-up (Table 1). For PFS, with reference to the low-risk Sokal score, the HR of high-risk groups was 9.301 (95% CI: 1.086-79.656, p=0.042) (Fig. 2A). Similarly, with reference to the low-risk ELTS score, the HR of intermediate- and high-risk groups were 4.744 (95% CI: 0.43-52.314, p=0.204) and 14.642 (95% CI: 1.523-140.791, p=0.020) (Fig. 2B). Regarding OS, with reference to the low-risk Sokal score, the HR of the intermediate- and high-risk groups were 1.835 (95% CI: 0.564-5.964, p=0.313) and 6.412 (95% CI: 2.11-19.489, p=0.001), respectively (Fig. 2C). With reference to the low-risk ELTS score, the HR of the intermediate- and high-risk groups were, 3.263 (95% CI: 1.242-8.576, p=0.016) and 7.258 (95% CI: 2.762-19.074, p<0.001) respectively (Fig. 2D). In the ROC analysis, the ELTS score was superior than the Sokal risk score for both predicting PFS (AUC=0.820 vs. AUC=0.818) and OS (AUC=0.762 vs. AUC=0.744). During the follow-up, 27 (14.6%) pts died, of which 6 died due to CML progression and causes of death were unrelated to CML in 21. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that the ELTS score could successfully predict high-risk pts compatible with the literature. With higher hazard ratios and better risk group stratifications, the ELTS score outperformed the Sokal score. The ELTS score can help clinicians to better discriminate poor prognostic pts and can promote optimal treatment strategies for these pts with potentially worse prognosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Long Term Follow up from the NCRI AML17 Trial of Attenuated Arsenic Trioxide and ATRA Therapy for Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 897-897
Author(s):  
Nigel H Russell ◽  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
Robert K Hills ◽  
Sophie Betteridge ◽  
Michael Dennis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Abstract Background: Two randomized studies have reported comparison of the "chemo-free" combination of ATO+ATRA with Anthracycline/ ATRA (AIDA) in APL. The GIMEMA-AMLSG-SAL trial, using a daily schedule improved both survival and relapse risk in patients with newly diagnosed, low or intermediate-risk APL. (Lo Coco et al., NEJM 2013; 369: 111-21). The NCRI AML17 trial using an attenuated dosing schedule in all risk groups resulted in a very low risk of relapse, significantly better EFS but no significant survival advantage Aims: The NCRI AML17 Trial compared AIDA vs the chemo-free combination of ATO (in an attenuated schedule) + ATRA. Here we present long term survival results for randomized patients and for 24 patients who received the same chemo-free schedule of ATO + ATRA after relapsing from the AIDA arm of the trial. Methods: From May 2009 to October 2013, 235 patients aged >16 who entered the AML17 trial with molecularly confirmed APL were randomized to either ATRA+ATO (8 week induction 0.3mg/kg d1-5 w1, 0.25mg/kgx2/w w2-8, followed by 4 consolidation courses of 0.3mg/kgx2 w1, 0.25mg/kgx2/ w2-4 (63 ATO doses) OR AIDA schedule: Idarubicin (Ida)12mg/m2 d2,4,6,8 + ATRA to d60) (induction) then Ida 5mg/m2 d1-4 + ATRA d1-15 (Course 2); Mitox. 10mg/m2 d1-4 + ATRA d1-15 (course 3); Ida 12mg/m2 d1 + ATRA d1-15 (Course 4). ATRA was 45mg/m2/d. Maintenance was not given. High risk patients could receive Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (d1,6mg/m2). Another 70 patients were treated in AML17 with AIDA after closure of the randomization. 25/189 patients relapsed post AIDA and 24 were treated with a median of 4 cycles (range 1-5) of ATRA + ATO, 11/24 were later transplanted. Follow-up is complete to 1 January 2016. Results: The median age was 47y (16-77); 57 had WBC>10x109/L (27 AIDA, 30 ATRA+ATO) and 49 (24 AIDA, 25 ATRA+ATO) were >60y. The early results of the randomization for newly diagnosed patients have been reported (Burnett et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16 (13):1295). 91% entered morphological CR with no significant difference in CR rate between the arms (Chemo-free 94%, Chemo 89%; OR 0.54 (0.21-1.34), p= 0.18). The OS at 4 years was 93% (Chemo-free) vs 89% (Chemo), HR 0.60 (0.26-1.42) p= 0.2, but EFS was significantly superior with ATRA+ATO (91% vs 70%, HR 0.35 (0.18-0.68) p=0.002). With a longer median follow-up of 53.4 months 5-year survival is now 93% (chemo-free) v 87% (chemo) (HR 0.61 (0.27-1.35) p=0.2). A significant reduction in relapse (2% vs 16% at 5 years, HR 0.19 (0.09-0.45) p=0.0005) translates to continuing significant RFS benefit for the chemo-free approach (96% vs 82%; HR 0.30 (0.13-0.67) p=0.004). This is seen both in low risk (95% vs 86% HR 0.45 (0.17-1.20) p=0.11) and high risk disease (100% vs 69% HR 0.10 (0.02-0.46) p=0.003), p=0.11 for heterogeneity. 25 patients relapsed following AIDA therapy, of whom 1 died in frank relapse before treatment could be initiated and 24 (5 with concomitant CNS involvement) were treated with the attenuated ATO + ATRA schedule. Of these 16 were treated at molecular relapse, reflecting the value of centralised MRD monitoring as part of the trial protocol. All 24 patients achieved molecular CR post ATO +ATRA. Eleven patients were transplanted (8 autograft, 3 allograft) including 4 of the 5 patients with CNS disease. 3 patients have had a second molecular relapse after ATO + ATRA salvage (1 transplanted and 2 not transplanted). The 3-year overall survival post-relapse is 96% with the only other death occurring post-transplant after 37 months. Summary/Conclusion: The combination of ATO + ATRA continues to show a very low risk of relapse irrespective of risk group resulting in significantly better RFS compared to AIDA and excellent survival but no survival benefit has emerged primarily because of effective salvage interventions for AIDA-treated patients with most patients treated at molecular relapse. Molecular monitoring for t(15;17) is therefore essential to optimize therapy with AIDA. For patients treated with frontline ATO+ATRA molecular monitoring is of questionable value once achievement of molecular CR has been documented, but molecular surveillance remains important in those with relapsed disease. The attenuated AML17 ATO dosing approach is effective both upfront and in patients relapsing post AIDA and these results question the role of transplantation as consolidation in patients achieving molecular CR2 with ATO + ATRA who do not have CNS disease at relapse. Disclosures Burnett: CTI Life Sciences, London: Employment. Hills:TEVA: Honoraria. Grimwade:TEVA: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Genetic Profiling Augments Prognostic Value of the EUTOS Long-Term Survival Score for Disease-Specific Mortality in Imatinib-Treated Asian Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3077-3077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hein Than ◽  
Weng Kit Lye ◽  
Chiu Hong Seow ◽  
Colin Nicholas Sng ◽  
John Carson Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Deletion Polymorphism ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Genetic Profiling

Abstract Introduction: Long-term survival rates among patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CP-CML) have remarkably improved since the introduction of imatinib, a BCR-ABL1 tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), as the standard first-line therapy. Several prognostic scores have been employed to predict clinical response and survival of CP-CML patients treated with TKIs. The EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score was recently introduced and shown to predict the probability of CML-specific death in long-term surviving patients on imatinib therapy, more effectively than the existing scores. The ELTS score was calculated by a formula that included age at diagnosis, spleen size below costal margin, platelet count and blast percentage in peripheral blood as prognostic factors. In our study, we evaluated the ELTS score in predicting the probabilities of CML-specific death, long-term overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in Asian CML patients treated with imatinib. As genetic differences, particularly the BCL-2 like 11 (BIM) deletion polymorphism, have been shown to confer intrinsic resistance to imatinib in East-Asian patients, we also explored the role of BIM deletion polymorphism profiling as a prognostic biomarker for CML-specific death among different risk groups stratified by the ELTS score. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on CP-CML patients treated with first-line imatinib within one year of diagnosis in Singapore General Hospital from June 2001 to November 2014. The ELTS score was obtained with online calculator at www.leukemia-net.org. Low-risk group was defined as a score ≤1.568, intermediate-risk group as a score >1.568 but ≤2.2185, and high-risk group as a score >2.2185. Progression was defined as transformation to accelerated or blast phase or death from any cause. OS and PFS were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence probabilities of CML-specific death were compared by the Gray test. Findings: 134 patients were included for analysis. 63% were Chinese, 17% were Malays, 8% were Indians and 12% were of mixed ethnic origin. Median age at diagnosis was 45 years and 60% were male. Median follow-up was 7.7 years (range: 0.4 to 13.2 years). 17 deaths out of 134 patients (13%) were recorded, of which 11 were CML-specific (65%). 54% of patients were categorised as low-risk, 36% as intermediate-risk and 10% as high-risk by the ELTS score. The cumulative incidence probabilities of CML-specific death at 10 years were 43% in high-risk (hazard ratio (HR): 11.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): (2.32, 59.71), p=0.003) and 9% in intermediate-risk (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: (0.37, 13.49), p=0.38) compared to 3% in low-risk groups.10-year OS probabilities were 50%, 82% and 93% in high-, intermediate- and low-risk ELTS groups respectively (p=0.001). 10-year PFS probabilities were 50%, 84% and 89% in high-, intermediate- and low-risk ELTS groups respectively (p=0.004). Among 103 East-Asian patients with low- and intermediate-risk ELTS sub-groups, 15% harboured BIM deletion polymorphism. The probability of CML-specific death at 10 years in this subset was 16% with BIM deletion polymorphism, but 4% without polymorphism (HR 4.30, 95% CI: (0.76, 24.35), p=0.099). 10-year OS probabilities in the subset were 75% and 89% in patients with and without BIM deletion polymorphism respectively (p=0.014). Conclusions: The ELTS score was able to predict the probability of CML-specific death and identify high-risk patients in our multi-racial Asian CML patients treated with imatinib. Genetic profiling using BIM deletion polymorphism provided further stratification by identifying a subset of inferior long-term survivors with high probability of CML-specific death among otherwise non high-risk patients. Disclosures Chuah: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Chiltern: Honoraria.

EUTOS Score Is Predictive of Event-Free Survival, but Not for Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients with Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1681-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katia B. Pagnano ◽  
Irene Lorand-Metze ◽  
Eliana C M Miranda ◽  
Vagner O Duarte ◽  
Marcia T Delamain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Sokal Score ◽  
Eutos Score

Abstract Abstract 1681 Recently the European LeukemiaNet has developed a new scoring system (European Treatment and Outcome Study [EUTOS] score) for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) treated with imatinib. The EUTOS score classifies patients in high or low risk on the basis of the percentage of basophils in the peripheral blood and the spleen size at diagnosis, with significant correlations with the achievement of an 18-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The aim of this work was to evaluate EUTOS score in CML-CP treated in our center with imatinib as a predictive factor for overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and PFS. Patients and methods: Between February 2003 and May 2012 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP were treated with imatinib 400 mg daily (n= 144) or imatinib 600–800 mg daily (n= 14) were included in the analysis. The criteria recommended by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) were used for the definitions of CCyR and the progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP). The EUTOS score was defined by (7×basophils) plus (4×spleen size) at diagnostic. A EUTOS score of more than 87 indicates high risk, and less than or equal to 87 low risk. EFS was measured from the start of imatinib treatment to the date of any of the following events: death from any cause at any time, loss of complete hematologic response, loss of CCyR, or progression to AP or BP. PFS was measured from the start of treatment to the date progression to AP or BP, last follow-up, or death from any cause. Survival probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test whereas it was applied cumulative incidence for the probability to achieve CCyR. Results: A total of 158 patients were treated, 94 (59.5%) male. The median age at Imatinib was 47 years (17–86 years). The median time from diagnosis to TKI therapy was 2 (0–6) months, with 153 (96.8%) receiving previous treatment with Hydrea. The median follow-up was 29 (1–110) months. The median splenomegaly size was 4 (0–29) cm and the median basophil percentage was 2.5% (0–18%). According to the Sokal score, 43 (34,4%) patients, 46 (36,8%), and 36 (28,8%) were in low, intermediate, and high Sokal score category, respectively (33 not available). Concerning the Hasford score, 60 (48,3%), 50 (40,4%) and 14 (11,3%) were in low, intermediate and high risk categories (34 NA). A total of 137 (86,8%) patients were in the low EUTOS score category and 21 (13,2%) in the high risk category. The cumulative probability of achieving a CCyR and MMR at 36 months for all patients was 78% and 64%, respectively. Patients who had not achieved CCyR after 6 months (51/153 – 33%) had a 2% risk of subsequent progression, which increased to 12% after 12 months, 14% in 18 months and 19% after 24 months. EFS, PFS, and OS rates for the whole group were 60%, 89%, and 92%, respectively. Patients with a low EUTOS score had higher rates of cumulative CCyR compared with patients with high EUTOS score (82% vs. 53%, p= 0.06) (figure 1). There were no differences in the cumulative CCyR rates in patients stratified by Sokal or Hasford scores (and 0.21 and P=0.82, respectively). Patients with CCyR at 18 months had a higher EFS (81% vs. 18%, p< 0.0001) and PFS rates (96% vs. 82%, p= 0.03). There was no difference in PFS (figure 2) and OS rates between patients with low and high EUTOS score. However, patients with high and intermediate Sokal score had an inferior PFS rates in comparison with low risk group (77%, 84% and 100%, respectively, p= 0.02). There was a superior EFS rates in low risk in comparison with high EUTOS score (63% vs. 36%, p= 0.01) (figure 3), whereas the overall survival there was no difference (91% vs. 100%). Sokal scores EFS rates were 68%, 60% and 40% for low, intermediate and high risk groups respectively (p= 0.03). In conclusion, similarly to the original report, EUTOS score seems to predict CCyR, but not PFS in our population. However, EFS was significantly better in the low than high risk group. The score can discriminate patients with poor outcome, with lower probability of achieving responses to first line imatinib therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The EUTOS Survival Score Is Preferable over the Sokal Score for Prognosis of Long-Term Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 595-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Pfirrmann ◽  
Joerg Hasford ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
Anna Turkina ◽  
Witold Prejzner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Survival Score ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Sokal Score

Abstract Introduction: The in-study and out-study sections of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) registry comprise data on imatinib-treated adult patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who were prospectively enrolled in clinical studies or registries between 2002 and 2006. All patients diagnosed with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML were eligible for analysis. The new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score was developed in 2,205 in-study patients (Blood 2014; 124(21):153). Its purpose is the discrimination of three risk groups with clinically significantly different probabilities of dying from CML. The score was validated in 1,120 out-study patients. Aims: Up to now, many investigators still apply the Sokal score for the prognostic discrimination of CML-patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The Sokal score allocated more than 20% of chronic-phase patients to the high-risk group while it was 12% with the new ELTS score. Long-term outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) suggests that the allocation of more than 20% chronic-phase CML patients into a high-risk group is too pessimistic. The focus of this analysis was the comparison of risk group allocations and prognosis between the two scores. Methods: Survival time was calculated from the date of start of treatment to death or to the latest follow-up date. Survival was censored at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first chronic phase. Cumulative incidence probabilities (CIPs) of dying of CML were compared with the Gray test and overall survival probabilities with the log-rank test. As "death due to CML", only death after confirmed disease progression was regarded. Progression was defined in accordance with the recommendations of the ELN (Baccarani et al, Blood 2013). Level of significance was 0.05. Results: Both registries combined, the 3,325 patients had a median observation time of 6.1 years. Six-year overall survival probability was 91% (95% confidence interval (CI): 89-92%). Death was due to CML in 142 of 309 deceased patients (46%).The 6-year CIP of dying of CML was 4% (CI: 4-5%). From low to high risk groups, the Sokal score resulted in 6-year CIPs of 3% (n=1358 (41%), CI: 2-4%), 4% (n=1209 (36%), CI: 3-5%), and 8% (n=758 (23%), CI: 6-11%) and the ELTS score in 6-year CIPs of 2% (n=2030 (61%), CI: 2-3%), 6% (n=898 (27%), CI: 4-7%), and 13% (n=397 (12%), CI: 10-17%). Of the 758 patients allocated to high risk by the Sokal score, the ELTS score classified 165 (22%) as low risk and 265 (35%) as intermediate risk. Compared to the 328 high-risk patients (43%) according to both scores (6-year CIP of dying: 13%, CI: 9-17%), the CIPs of dying were significantly lower for the 165 low-risk patients (p=0.0062, 6-year CIP: 5%, CI: 2-9%) and for the 265 intermediate-risk patients (p=0.0050, 6-year CIP: 5%, CI: 3-9%). These 430 Sokal high but ELTS non-high-risk patients (6-year OS: 89%. CI: 86-92%) showed significantly higher OS probabilities than the 328 Sokal and ELTS high-risk patients (p=0.030, 6-year OS: 81%. CI: 76-85%). Of the 2030 patients identified as low risk by the ELTS score, the Sokal score allocated 603 (30%) to the intermediate- and 165 (8%) to the high-risk group. Without significant CIP differences to the latter group, at 6 years, the CIP of dying was 2% (CI: 1-3%) in the 1262 low-risk and also 2% in the 603 intermediate-risk patients (CI: 1-3%). The OS probabilities of the 768 non-low-risk patients according to the Sokal score (6-year OS: 93%. CI: 91-95%) were not significantly different from the 1262 classified as low-risk by both scores (6-year OS: 95%. CI: 93-96%). Conclusions: To be able to perform comparisons between the various prognostic groups suggested by the Sokal and the EUTOS survival score with a reasonable power, data of in- and out-study samples were combined. The Sokal score allocated an absolute difference of 12% (n=430) more patients to the high-risk groups than the EUTOS survival score. As these patients had significantly and clinically relevantly lower CIPs and higher OS probabilities, the allocation of the Sokal score was not appropriate. Contrarily, the long-term outcome of 768 patients assessed as low-risk by the ELTS and non-low-risk by the Sokal score was not different from the outcome of 1262 assesses as low-risk patients by both scores. For prognosis of long-term survival outcome, the use of the EUTOS survival score is recommended. Disclosures Pfirrmann: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant. Turkina:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy. Prejzner:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Simonsson:Novartis Pharma: Research Funding. Zaritskey:University of Heidelberg: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Zackova:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Janssen:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Cervantes:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; CTI-Baxter: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Hehlmann:Novartis Pharma: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Pre-irradiation chemotherapy for infants and children with medulloblastoma: a preliminary report

1989 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia S. Kretschmar ◽  
Nancy J. Tarbell ◽  
William Kupsky ◽  
Beverly L. Lavally ◽  
Jay S. Loeffler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Direct Evaluation ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Disease Free

✓ From March, 1984, through June, 1987, 21 newly diagnosed children with high-risk medulloblastoma (Chang Stage T3 to T4) were treated on a 9-week postoperative, pre-irradiation chemotherapy regimen consisting of vincristine and cisplatin. The children over 2 years old then received radiation therapy. Six infants (aged 6 to 18 months) were maintained on chemotherapy consisting of MOP (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, and procarbazine) until the age of 2 years, at which time they were referred for irradiation. Of 13 children with measurable disease following surgery, five showed a definite response on computerized tomography scans to vincristine and cisplatin (one complete response and four partial responses) and five others showed clear marginal responses. Four of the six infants were disease-free at 19, 32, 35, and 57 months from diagnosis. One infant developed progressive disease at the completion of the vincristine and cisplatin course, and a second infant had progression during MOP administration. Three of the 21 children developed hearing loss within the speech frequencies during cisplatin treatments, but there were no other major toxicities. Fifteen children remained disease-free with a median follow-up period of 35 months (range 19 to 57 months). Chemotherapy given between surgery and radiotherapy may allow for the direct evaluation of a specific drug regimen and permit the postponement of radiation therapy in infants. Pre-irradiation vincristine and cisplatin was well tolerated and effective in shrinking the tumor in most children with medulloblastoma. Such chemotherapy regimens have the potential for extending long-term survival in high-risk children.

Long-Term Outcome of Iron-Induced Cardiac Disease in Patients with Thalassemia Major Treated with Combined DFP/DFO or DFO Alone.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1764-1764
Author(s):  
Maria Eliana Lai ◽  
Stefania Vacquer ◽  
Alessia Pepe ◽  
Aurelio Maggio ◽  
Maria P. Carta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiac Disease ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Thalassemia Major ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract We conducted a 4-yr prospective trial to evaluate the long-term effects of combined deferiprone (DFP)/deferoxamine (DFO) on reversal of cardiac complications in thalassemia major compared to those of DFO alone. Twenty-eight patients (pts) with cardiac disease requiring medication were stratified according to their risk for cardiac death. Fourteen pts were high risk, serum ferritin (SF) > 2500 ug/L on two-thirds of occasions since the onset of cardiac disease. Of those with a SF < 2500 ug/L (low risk), six had progressive decrements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nine high-risk pts and six low-risk pts were placed on DFP/DFO (DFP, 75 mg/kg/d divided t.i.d.; DFO, 40 – 50 mg/kg over 8 – 12 h at night 5 – 7 d/wk. The others infused DFO alone. If SF fell below 500 ug/L, DFO infusions were reduced to 2 d/wk. Cardiac follow-up (including blood work and ECG) was done at 4-m intervals. M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms were done at 4- to 6-m intervals. Cardiac T2* was not available at the beginning of the study. All but eight patients (3 death, 1 refusal, 2 claustrophobic, 2 pacemaker) subsequently had at least one T2* assessment. Routine lab tests were done at 1- to 6-m intervals. Blood counts were done at 7- to 10-d intervals for those taking DFP. Mean follow-up was approximately 40 m. Compliance with DFO was significantly better among low-risk pts in both treatment groups (DFP/DFO, 82% vs 61%; DFO alone, 83% vs 52%) as was that with DFP (94% vs 76%). At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the SF levels, LVEFs or left ventricular shortening fractions (LVSFs) of pts on DFP/DFO or DFO alone in either risk group except for the LVEFs of the low-risk group (DFP/DFO, 56.5% +/− 5.5%; DFO alone, 65.4% +/− 5.0%; p = 0.032). In the high-risk group, four cardiac events (3 deaths, 1 worsening of CHF) occurred in the group getting DFO alone vs none in the DFP/DFO-treated group. The latter pts showed a decrease in SF and an increase in both LVEF and LVSF at the end of study (EOS). The three pts who died (at 17 to 35 m) had increased SFs. These pts were not rescued by IV DFO (98 +/− 12 mg/kg/d). The two DFO-treated pts who survived had marginally improved T2*s (1.5 to 3.0 ms and 7.6 to 8.8 ms) over the year prior to EOS. Only one of the seven evaluable pts on DFP/DFO had a T2* < 10 ms, the others averaging 19.4 +/− 6.7 ms. Among the low-risk pts, those on DFP/DFO showed a reduction in SF and an improvement in both LVEF and LVSF. Those on DFO alone had increased SF but essentially no change in LVEFs or LVSFs. Five pts on DFP/DFO had T2* evaluations. In two pts, T2* rose from 9.0 to 37 ms (38 m) and from 9.3 to 11.8 ms (17 m). The remaining three had T2* values > 20 ms at EOS. Similar results were seen in low-risk pts on DFO alone. These finding clearly support the notion that DFP/DFO has a beneficial effect upon the heart, even in well established disease. Moreover, our finding of low T2* values associated with low SF levels indicates the importance of tailoring treatment to each individual.

Long-term follow-up of women enrolled in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage ovarian cancer (ICON1)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5509-5509 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Swart
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
P Value ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

5509 Background: ICON1 and a meta-analysis of all relevant trials demonstrated an improvement in 5 year recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) for women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (ES EOC) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared to no adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to determine if this initial benefit is maintained long-term and whether benefit is different with different risk groups of patients defined by stage, grade and histology. Method: 477 women with ES EOC were recruited from centres in Italy (271 women) UK (195) Switzerland (11) between August 1991 and January 2000. 5-year results were presented at ASCO 2001. Systematic long-term follow up was planned and completed in May 2006. Results: With a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 168 women have developed recurrent disease or died and 144 women have died. The Hazard Ratio (HR) for RFS of 0.70 in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy (95% CI 0.52–0.95 p= 0.023) translated into an improvement of 10-year absolute RFS of 10% from 57 to 67%. For OS, HR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.53–1.02 p= 0.066), a corresponding improvement in 10-year absolute OS of 8% from 64% to 72%. 26% of patients died from causes other than ovarian cancer. Stage I patients were grouped as low (Ia, grade 1), medium (Ia grade 2, Ib or Ic grade 1) and high risk (Ia, grade 3, Ib or IC grade 2 or 3, any clear cell). The test of interaction between risk groups and adjuvant treatment for RFS and OS was 0.055 and 0.13, respectively. The HR, 95%CI and p value are summarised in the table . Conclusions The long-term benefit of adjuvant treatment on RFS is confirmed. There is clear evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence/death or death alone in high-risk patients but not in the low-risk group. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Validation of Clinical Prognostic Models and Integration of Genetic Biomarkers of Drug Resistance in CLL Patients Treated with Ibrutinib

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 186-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inhye E. Ahn ◽  
Xin Tian ◽  
Maher Albitar ◽  
Sarah E. M. Herman ◽  
Erika M. Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prognostic Models ◽  
Discovery Cohort ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: We previously reported a prognostic scoring system in CLL using pre-treatment factors in patients treated with ibrutinib [Ahn et al, 2016 ASH Annual Meeting]. Here we present long-term follow-up results and validation of the prognostic models in a large independent cohort of patients. We also determine the incidence of resistance-conferring mutations in BTK and PLCG2 genes in different clinical risk groups. Methods and Patients: The discovery cohort comprised 84 CLL patients on a phase II study with either TP53 aberration (deletion 17p or TP53 mutation) or age ≥65 years (NCT01500733). The validation cohort comprised 607 patients pooled from four phase II and III studies for ibrutinib in treatment-naïve or relapsed/refractory CLL (NCT01105247; NCT01578707; NCT01722487; NCT01744691). All patients received single-agent ibrutinib 420mg once daily. We used Cox regression models to identify independent predictors of PFS, Kaplan-Meier method to estimate probabilities of PFS, log-rank test to compare PFS, and Cochran-Armitage trend test to compare the incidence of mutation among subgroups. We used R version 3.5.0 or SAS® version 9.3 for statistical analyses. For biomarker correlation, we tested cellular DNA or cell-free DNA collected from patients in the discovery cohort with the targeted sequencing of BTK and PLCG2 genes. Result: At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 28 (33.3%) of 84 patients in the discovery cohort progressed or died. 52 (61.9%) patients had treatment-naïve CLL. Independent factors of PFS on univariate analysis were; TP53 aberration, prior treatment, and β-2 microglobulin (B2M) >4mg/L (P<0.05 for all tests). Unmutated IGHV and advanced Rai stage (III/IV) showed a trend toward inferior outcome without reaching statistical significance. Because higher levels of B2M were associated with relapsed/refractory CLL, we performed two multivariate Cox regression models to assess B2M and prior treatment status separately. Risk groups were determined by the presence of TP53 aberration, advanced Rai stage, and B2M >4mg/L for Model 1, and TP53 aberration, advanced Rai stage, and relapsed/refractory CLL for Model 2 (Table 1). The high-risk group had all three adverse risk factors; the intermediate-risk group had two risk factors; and the low-risk group, none or one. The median PFS of the high-risk group was 38.9 months for Model 1 and 38.4 months for Model 2, and was significantly shorter than those of intermediate and low-risk groups. In the validation cohort, 254 (41.8%) of 607 patients progressed or died at a median follow-up of 4.2 years. 167 (27.5%) patients had treatment-naïve CLL. Both models showed statistically significant differences in PFS by risk groups (Table 1). For the high-risk group, 4-year PFS was 30.2% in Model 1 and 30.5% in Model 2, which were inferior to those of intermediate (53.4 and 52.4%) and low-risk groups (68.7 and 73.7%). Model 1 classified 20% of patients and Model 2 classified 28% of patients to the high-risk group. BTK and PLCG2 mutations are common genetic drivers of ibrutinib resistance in CLL. To determine whether the incidence of these mutations correlates with prognostic risk groups, we performed targeted sequencing of BTK and PLCG2 of samples collected from patients in the discovery cohort. We used cell-free DNA for patients who received long-term ibrutinib (≥3 years) and had low circulating tumor burden, and cellular DNA, for samples collected within 3 years on ibrutinib or at progression. Of 84 patients, 69 (82.1%) were tested at least once, and 37 (44.0%) were tested at least twice. The frequency of testing was similar across the risk groups by two models (P>0.05). The cumulative incidences of mutations at 5 years in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were: 21.4%, 44.8% and 50%, respectively, by Model 1 (P=0.02); and 22.6%, 41.4% and 66.7%, respectively, by Model 2 (P=0.01). Conclusion: We developed and validated prognostic models to predict the risk of disease progression or death in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib. Risk groups classified by three commonly available pre-treatment factors showed statistically significant differences in PFS. The clinically-defined high-risk disease was linked to higher propensity to develop clonal evolution with BTK and/or PLCG2 mutations, which heralded ibrutinib resistance. Disclosures Albitar: Neogenomics Laboratories: Employment. Ma:Neogenomics Laboratories: Employment. Ipe:Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Tsao:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Cheng:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Dean:CTI BioPharma Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wiestner:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Christine Greil ◽  
Monika Engelhardt ◽  
Jürgen Finke ◽  
Ralph Wäsch
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

The development of new inhibitory and immunological agents and combination therapies significantly improved response rates and survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, but the disease is still considered to be incurable by current standards and the prognosis is dismal especially in high-risk groups and in relapsed and/or refractory patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) may enable long-term survival and even cure for individual patients via an immune-mediated graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect, but remains controversial due to relevant transplant-related risks, particularly immunosuppression and graft-versus-host disease, and a substantial non-relapse mortality. The decreased risk of disease progression may outweigh this treatment-related toxicity for young, fit patients in high-risk constellations with otherwise often poor long-term prognosis. Here, allo-SCT should be considered within clinical trials in first-line as part of a tandem approach to separate myeloablation achieved by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous SCT, and following allo-SCT with a reduced-intensity conditioning to minimize treatment-related organ toxicities but allow GvM effect. Our review aims to better define the role of allo-SCT in myeloma treatment particularly in the context of new immunomodulatory approaches.

scholarly journals Long-term survival after intensive chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents in AML patients aged 70 years and older: a large patient data set study from European registries

Leukemia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Récher ◽  
Christoph Röllig ◽  
Emilie Bérard ◽  
Sarah Bertoli ◽  
Pierre-Yves Dumas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Hypomethylating Agents ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractThe outcome of acute myeloid leukemia patients aged 70 years or older is poor. Defining the best treatment option remains controversial especially when choosing between intensive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents. We set up a multicentric European database collecting data of 3 700 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥70 years. The primary objective was to compare overall survival in patients selected for intensive chemotherapy (n = 1199) or hypomethylating agents (n = 1073). With a median follow-up of 49.5 months, the median overall survival was 10.9 (95% CI: 9.7–11.6) and 9.2 months (95% CI: 8.3–10.2) with chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents, respectively. Complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery was 56.1% and 19.7% with chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents, respectively (P < 0.0001). Treatment effect on overall survival was time-dependent. The Royston and Parmar model showed that patients treated with hypomethylating agents had a significantly lower risk of death before 1.5 months of follow-up; no significant difference between 1.5 and 4.0 months, whereas patients treated with intensive chemotherapy had a significantly better overall survival from four months after start of therapy. This study shows that intensive chemotherapy remains a valuable option associated with a better long-term survival in older AML patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document