Gleevec Therapy in Advanced Phases of the Cml - Polish Study Report.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4701-4701
Author(s):  
Bernadeta B. Ceglarek ◽  
Lech J. Konopka ◽  
Anna Sikorska ◽  
Kinga Kos ◽  
Jerzy Holowiecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Accelerated phase marks the onset of advanced rapidly progressive chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) and generally leads finally to a fatal blast crisis (BC) within 6 months. Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) as a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor has demonstrated significant activity in chronic phase (CP) of CML. Because of the observed activity and favorable tolerability of Gleevec and because of the limited treatment options available to these patients we have introduced Gleevec in CML patients meeting rigorous criteria for acceleration and blast crisis phase of CML. PATIENTS: MALE - 31 and FEMALE - 20 were eligible for inclusion in this study if they were at least 18 years old and had a diagnosis of Ph+ CML (AP; BC) confirmed by cytology, histology, cytogenetic and molecular analyses. Characteristics CML patients (AP-accelerated phase; BC-blast crisis phase) is showed in table 1. Table 1- Demographics, Disease History and Characteristics of CML Patients. 1 Duration time of CML-yr 3.8 (1–4.5) 3.7 (0.7–5.1) Prior therapy -n(%) 100% 100% combined Chemotherapy 10 (33) 18 (86) BMT 2 (6.6) 0 Sokal’s score >0.8 16 (53) 15 (71) PLT (x 109/L) 100.0–300.0 11 (37) 8 (38) >300.0 15 (50) 4 (19) Blasts in peripheral blood (%) median 9 34 range 4–20 31–80 Blasts in bone marrow (%) range 10–25 32–78 HGB (g%) median 6.24 6.12 range 5.0–9.4 4.4–10.0 Gleevec dosage AP BC 300mg: n (%) 1 (3.3) 1 (4.8%) 400 mg: n (%) 4 (13.3) 1 (4.8) 600–800 mg: n (%) 25 (83.4) 19 (90.4) Duration of treatment (months) AP BC median 31.64 40.0 range 1–98 0.5–91 Patients received Gleevec 300–800 mg orally daily (table 2). Clinical evaluation of Gleevec therapy was determined by the rate of sustained haematological response (lasting >= 4 weeks) The results of Gleevec therapy are showed in table 2. Table 2 - Haematologic Response in Patients with AP & BC Phase after Gleevec Treatment Response AP BC 2 CHR 25 (83.3%) 4 (19.0%) Cytogenetic response Major : 5 (16.7%) 1 (4.8%) CCR 2 (6.7%) 0 PCR 3 (10.0%) 1 (4.8%) Minimal 11 (36.7%) 1.4.8%) No response 9 (30%) 18 (85.6%) BMT performed 5 (16.7%) 2 (9.6%) after Gleevec therapy (months) 6–12 7–13 The most often observed side effects were irst few months ( neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, weakness, bone and muscles pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, legs’ oedema, deaths (6.3% – 27.3%). Conclusions: Imatinib as a single agent is well tolerated and has substantial activity in the accelerated phase of CML. The overall response rate in these cases was 83%. Imatinib as a single agent is well tolerated and has substantial activity in the accelerated phase of CML. The overall response rate in these cases was 83%. Imatinib as a single agent is well tolerated and has substantial activity in the accelerated phase of CML. The overall response rate in these cases was 83%. 5 pts. out of these 30 patients are still in the chronic phase after 10 to 32 months of follow-up. In 4 ( 19%) out of 21 patients with BC the improvement after Gleevec therapy was short and transient mainly due to advanced stage of disease.

Cardiac Biomarkers Predict for Ability To Tolerate and Complete Therapy with Lenalidomide ± Dexamathosone in AL Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 130-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Steven Zeldenrust ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Cardiac Biomarker ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, has been shown to be highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: We studied the toxicity and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with symptomatic AL. Patients received single agent lenalidomide. If progression by 3 months or no evidence of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Originally, twenty-three patients (Cohort 1) were enrolled according to study design. Because of a significant early drop out rate and notable activity of the regimen, the trial was modified to include an additional 15 patients (Cohort 2). Baseline characteristics and adverse events are available for all enrolled patients, but at the time of this writing, response data are available for Cohort 1 patients due to short follow-up of Cohort 2, but will be updated by the time of the meeting. Results: Median age was 64 years, with 69% male. Twenty-three were previously treated. Organ involvement was cardiac (67%), renal (64%), hepatic (17%), nerve (17%). Thirty-three, twenty-two, and forty-four percent of patients were cardiac biomarker stage 1, 2, and, 3 respectively. Of the 37 patients, one was a cancel, and 6 have not yet made it through 3 months of protocol treatment and event monitoring. The respective median follow-ups for Cohorts 1 and 2 are 17 and 3.4 months. Of the remaining, 30 patients, within the first 3 cycles of therapy fifteen patients discontinued treatment: 7 early deaths and 8 adverse events or other causes. Three additional patients died 0.5 to 2 months after stopping treatment. The best predictor for early withdrawal and/or death was baseline NT-proBNP and cardiac biomarker staging system (cut-offs for serum troponin T <0.035 ng/ml and NT-proBNP <332 pg/ml--Stage I neither above cut-off; Stage III, both above cut-off; and Stage II, one above cut-off). Figure1 Figure1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Of the twenty 22 patients assessed for response ten patients responded to treatment for an overall response rate of 45%, including 23% organ responders. Among the patients with organ responses, there were four renal responses, two cardiac responses and two liver responses. All but one of the responders had dexamethasone added to their treatment program. The most common grade 3−4 adverse events at least possibly attributable to lenalidomide were neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (21%), fatigue (15%), and rash (12%). Conclusions: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone has significant activity in patients with AL with an overall response rate of 45%. Baseline NT−proBNP may be an effective eligibility screening strategy for subsequent trials.

Phase Ib study combining ibrutinib with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8502-8502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Younes ◽  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
Sara Alberti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Large B Cell

8502 Background: Ibrutinib, a first-in-class oral Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated single-agent activity in a variety of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies with limited toxicity, making it an appropriate drug to combine with standard R-CHOP chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated NHL. Methods: Patients received oral daily dose of ibrutinib (280, 420, or 560 mg) in combination with standard doses of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine on day 1, and prednisone on days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles). The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib in combination with standard R-CHOP (IR-CHOP). The secondary objectives were to assess safety, overall response rate, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Results: Seventeen patients (7, 4, and 6 in increasing ibrutinib doses) were enrolled: 59% male, median age 65 (range 46-81) years, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 47%, mantle cell lymphoma 29% and follicular lymphoma 24%. In the 280 mg cohort, 2 patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT): 1 with transient syncope and 1 with periorbital cellulitis; at 560 mg, 1 patient had gastritis (grade 2). The RP2D was established at 560 mg ibrutinib. The most common (≥ 20% of patients) adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (77%), thrombocytopenia (65%), vomiting (59%), anemia (53%), nausea (47%), fatigue (35%), headache (29%), constipation (24%), diarrhea (24%), and dizziness (24%). To date, 6 patients completed 6 cycles of treatment, and 2 patients discontinued treatment (1 due to noncompliance with the study drug and 1 due to non-DLT AE). At the time of this analysis, of the 10 patients had at least one post baseline tumor, the overall response rate was 100% (7 complete and 3 partial responses). Conclusions: The combination of IR-CHOP has an acceptable safety profile. No new toxicities were noted with adding ibrutinib to R-CHOP. An expansion cohort 560 mg ibrutinib (RP2D) is being opened to further explore the safety and efficacy of IR-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Clinical trial information: NCT01569750.

Phase II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab for Patients with CD5+/CD20+ Hematologic Malignancies Who Relapse or Progress After Rituximab. Interim Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2376-2376
Author(s):  
Marays Veliz ◽  
Ricardo Santana ◽  
Jeffrey E Lancet ◽  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2376 Poster Board II-353 Background: Patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL and patients with mantle cell lymphoma (McL) have a poor prognosis. Overall response rate (ORR) to salvage therapy for refractory patients is approximately 10-30%, and survival benefit with current treatment approaches is limited. Phase II studies of single agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL revealed an ORR of 32-58% (7-17% CR), depending on treatment dose, scheduled used and duration of treatment with lenalidomide. In patients with refractory or relapsed McL, lenalidomide treatment resulted in an ORR of 53% (CR 20%, PR 33%), and a 14-month median duration of response (Habermann et al 2009). Recent in vitro studies have shown that lenalidomide enhances the rituximab-induced killing of NHL cell lines and B-CLL cells via ADCC by restoring the defective T-cell and NK-cell mediated ability to form immune synapses to exert tumor cell cytotoxicity. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL or McL received oral lenalidomide via dose escalation as follows, 2.5 mg on days 1-7, 5mg on day 8-14 and 10mg on day 15-21 followed by 7 days of rest in 28-day cycle; for cycle 2 and beyond 20mg was given on day 1-21 on a 28 day cycle. Rituximab was dosed at 375mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks starting on day 15 of cycle 1. Treatment was continued until disease progression or toxicity. All patients were given allopurinol 300mg orally twice per day starting 3 days prior to first dose of lenalidomide. CT scans, and bone marrow biopsies were done every 2 months to assess for response. Primary objectives were overall response rate (CR+PR) and safety and tolerability of the combination regimen. Results: 17 patients were enrolled on study (13 patients with CLL/SLL and 4 patients with McL). Median number of prior chemotherapies was 3 (range 1-5). Median age was 64 years (range 42-80). Among patients with CLL, the most common cytogenetic abnormalities were trisomy 12 (isolated n=3, associated with other abnormalities n=4), del11q (isolated n=1, with others n=3), isolated del13q (n=1), complex cytogenetics with 3 or more abnormalities (n=4 including 1 patient with del 17p). Responses were assessed every 2 months after initiation of therapy. Response rate for 13 evaluable patients (10 with CLL and 3 with McL) relative to months on treatment with lenalidomide are summarized in the table. Although all responses were PR, the rate of PR improved with continued therapy suggesting increased responses with a longer duration of treatment with lenalidomide. Currently, 7 patients are still receiving active treatment on study, all with CLL (3 achieved a PR and 4 have SD). Of the 4 patients with McL enrolled on study, 1 achieved a PR after 2 months of therapy; 1 achieved SD after 2 months of therapy with a sustained SD after 6 months; 1 patient achieved SD after 2 months, but progressed after 6 months on treatment. The regimen was well tolerated. Most common (>5%) toxicities include neutropenia (35% grade 3, 6% grade 4), fatigue (17% grade 1-2, 6% grade 3), tumor flare (12% grade 2, 12% grade 3), acute renal insufficiency (6% grade 1, 12% grade 3), rituximab related infusion reactions (6% grade 2, 6% grade 3), flu-like symptoms (6% grade 2, 6% grade 3), venous thromboembolic disease (6% grade 2, 6% grade 3), infections (11% including 1 patient with fatal endocarditis), and hypercalcemia (11% grade 4). Correlative studies are ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of lenalidomide with Rituximab is a promising combination regimen in CLL patients with very poor prognosis who have undergone multiple lines of therapy. This treatment combination appears tolerable with observed events consistent with the use of these two agents in other studies. Further investigation is warranted, possibly in the front line setting and in combination with other agents. Disclosures: Lancet: Celgene: Research Funding.

Phase I study of the combination of fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone in low-grade lymphoma.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
P McLaughlin ◽  
F B Hagemeister ◽  
F Swan ◽  
F Cabanillas ◽  
O Pate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
High Fraction

PURPOSE Fludarabine is an active agent for patients with low-grade lymphoma (LGL) but has mainly been used as a single agent. This trial was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a combination of fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone (FND), to identify the toxicities of these agents in combination, and to make preliminary observations about the efficacy of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients with recurrent LGL or follicular large-cell lymphoma were treated, in cohorts of three, at stepwise escalating doses. Patients were required to have adequate marrow function and normal renal, hepatic, and cardiac function. RESULTS The MTD of the combination was found to be as follows: fludarabine, 25 mg/m2/d (days 1 to 3); mitoxantrone, 10 mg/m2 (day 1); and dexamethasone, 20 mg/d (days 1 to 5). Each course was administered monthly, and up to eight courses were given. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and infections. Thrombocytopenia was modest. Nonhematologic toxicity was very modest. Responses were seen at every dose level. The overall response rate was 71%, with a 43% complete remission (CR) rate. The median duration of CR was 18 months (with follow-up duration from 13 to 28+ months). CONCLUSION FND was well tolerated in this population. While our primary aim was to define the MTD, our preliminary observations on the efficacy of the regimen were favorable. The overall response rate was high, there was a high fraction of CRs, and our early impression is that these responses are durable.

SDX-105 Demonstrates a High Response Rate as a Single-Agent with Acceptable Safety in Rituximab-Refractory, Relpased Indolent or Transformed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2480-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Robert O. Kerr ◽  
K. Sue Robinson ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Cell Death Pathway ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract SDX-105 (Treanda™, Bendamustine HCl) is an alkylating agent that may exert its anti-tumor activity via mitotic catastrophe, an apoptosis-independent cell-death pathway, as well as, through apoptosis. Its cytotoxic potency is unattenuated in chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma cell lines. We initiated a multi-center Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDX-105 in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent or transformed B cell NHL. Patients must have pathologically-confirmed disease that has been demonstrated to be rituximab-refractory (no response or progression within 6 months) or must be intolerant of rituximab. Other requirements include measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function (ANC ≥1K/mm3, platelet ≥ 100K/mm3, except in cases of >50% NHL in bone marrow), up to 3 prior chemotherapies, and no prior allogeneic transplant. Patients receive SDX-105, 120 mg/m2 IV over 30–60 min, days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity during a cycle results in dose reduction for subsequent cycles (to 90 mg/m2 and then to 60 mg/m2). Patients achieving stable disease or better after 6 cycles may receive up to 6 more cycles. 49 patients have been accrued to date with data available on the first 15 patients. The median age is 69 yrs (range 47–84), 47% male, median 6 yrs since diagnosis with NHL. Histologies: 10 follicular (6 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3), 2 SLL, 1 marginal zone and 2 transformed NHL. Other features include: 93% Stage III/IV, 20% with B symptoms, 87% with extranodal disease, median 2 prior chemotherapies with 40% not responding to last chemotherapy. 4 patients have required dose reduction to 90 mg/m2 and 2 patients have withdrawn prior to completing 6 cycles due to treatment-associated toxicity. The current overall response rate (ORR) based upon best response in the intent-to-treat population is 80% (CR/CRu 20%, PR 60%). Overall 73% of patients experienced a related non-hematologic adverse event (AE), of which 20% were Grade 3 and 0% Grade 4. The most frequent AEs were nausea (40%), vomiting (27%), fatigue (33%), anorexia (20%), and constipation (20%). Alopecia was not observed. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 53% (neutropenia), 20% (thrombocytopenia), and 13% (anemia) of patients. 4 patients experienced serious AEs, including 1 patient with baseline renal insufficiency who died on study from renal failure and pulmonary edema; other events include admissions for fever and anemia, urinary tract infection, and dehydration. Based upon these preliminary findings, SDX-105 demonstrates a high overall response rate with acceptable hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity in a relapsed lymphoma patient population, many of whom are refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy combinations. An additional study evaluating the combination of SDX-105 and rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent NHL who are rituximab-sensitive is also ongoing.

Is First Line Single Agent Rituximab the Best Treatment for Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma? Update of a Multicentric Study Comparing Rituximab vs CNOP vs Rituximab Plus CNOP.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2431-2431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Rivas-Vera ◽  
Enrique Baez ◽  
Pedro Sobrevilla-Calvo ◽  
Severiano Baltazar ◽  
Francisco Tripp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate efficacy, safety, Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) treated with chemotherapy vs. immunotherapy vs immunochemotherapy as first-line therapy, an up-date report. Methods: Patients with indolent NHL were randomized to receive: (A) Rituximab x 6/w, (B) CNOP (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, vincristine and prednisone) x 6 or (C) R-CNOP x 6, at standard doses. Results: 195 patients were included, 183 are evaluable for OS and toxicity (A:62, B:55 and C:66), 144 are evaluable for overall response rate (ORR) and DFS (A:53, B:41 and C:50). Clinical characteristics: 89 male (45.6%), mean age 59±14 (±SD), 148 (75.9%) in stage (III/IV), without significant differences between groups. Overall Response Rate (CR+PR) was: A: 84.9%, B:83.4% and C:90% (P=0.545). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent in the chemotherapy groups: A: 4.8%, B: 23.6% and C:18.2% (P=0.001) as it was the infectious toxicity (grade 2/4): A:4.8%, B:5.5% and C:15.2% (P=0.07). DFS at 24 months was: A 68%, B:65% and C:70%, (P=0.93) and the OS was A:87%, B:84% and C:78%. P=0.89. Conclusions: We did not find any important differences, between groups, regarding the Overall Response Rate, Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival at 24 months. However, single agent rituximab was better tolerated, with less toxicity in comparison with the chemotherapy containing groups. Based on these findings, it maybe reasonable to use immunotherapy only, as first-line therapy for patients with indolent NHL.

A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan (BM) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Heather E. Oakervee ◽  
Nicola Foot ◽  
Samir Agrawal ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: Bortezomib as a single agent has known efficacy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 35% in the SUMMIT study and 46% in the APEX study. In-vitro studies including our own have demonstrated potent synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. It therefore follows that responses to bortezomib may be further improved by the combination of such drugs. Aims: The primary objectives of this Phase I/II study was to assess the safety, tolerability and response rates in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma; secondary objectives being time to progression (TTP) and overall surival (OS). Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial for patients with relapsed myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8 and 11 of each 28 day cycle with melphalan on day 2 at increasing dose levels. This was initially at 10mg/m2, but due to cytopenias subsequently at 2.5 and 5mg/m2 (levels 1a, 1 and 2) and we plan to escalate to 7.5mg/m2. Up to 8 cycles were given with dexamethasone added for stable or progressive disease after 4 or 2 cycles respectively. Responses were determined by EBMT criteria. Results: To date, 18 patients have been enrolled (12 male 6 female; median age 60 [range 44–73]; median number of prior therapies 3 [range 1–5] of which 17 have had at least one autologous stem cell procedure with high dose melphalan; 10 prior thalidomide and 2 prior bortezomib). 12 patients received melphalan at 10mg/m2 but due to unacceptable delays predominantly due to thrombocytopaenia, subsequent treatment levels commenced at 2.5mg/m2. The median number of cycles completed thus far is 4 (range 0–8) and of the 16 evaluable, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 50% rising to 75% following the addition of dexamethasone as per protocol. At level 1a (melphalan 10mg/m2 ,N=12, median number of cycles completed =5) the best responses (with dexamethasone as indicated) were: 1CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PR, 2 MR; at level 1 (melphalan 2.5mg/m2, N=4) 1 PR, 2 MR (after 2 cycles only). The median time to any response was 1 cycle (range 1–3 ). Three patients have progressive disease, but the median TTP and OS have not yet been reached (median follow-up 3 months). Non-haematological toxicities have been modest with 7 SAEs reported of which only 1 was possibly drug related (myocardial infarction), and 4 episodes of Grade 3 neuropathy (2 resulting in study withdrawal). The commonest grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was thrombocytopaenia (N=10) complicated by bleeding in one patient, followed by neutropenia (N=6). Summary: The combination of bortezomib and intravenous melphalan can be given safely to patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and dose escalation is ongoing. Myelosupression was the commonest grade 3–4 adverse event. A response rate of 50% was seen, which was further improved to 75% with the addition of dexamethasone. This combination may therefore result in higher responses than single agent bortezomib in heavily pretreated patients.

Phase II Trial of the mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 in Relapsed and/or Refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia: The Dana Farber Cancer Institute Experience.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1011-1011
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Stacey Chuma ◽  
Amy Sam ◽  
Renee Leduc ◽  
Marybeth Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Dana Farber Cancer Institute ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have demonstrated the clinical activity of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 in low- grade lymphomas. Our preclinical studies demonstrated activity of mTOR inhibitors in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) cell lines and patient samples. This phase II study aimed to determine safety and activity of the oral mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (Novartis Pharmaceutical, MA) in patients with relapsed or refractory WM. METHODS: Patients who had at least one previous therapy for WM, and who had symptomatic relapsed or refractory disease were eligible. NCI CTCAE v3.0 was used for toxicity assessment. All patients received daily RAD001 at 10 mg. A cycle was considered 28 days. Patients were allowed to stay on therapy until progression of disease or excessive toxicity. This study was conducted in a collaborative effort between Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine. Here, we report the data on the patients accrued at DFCI. RESULTS: 19 pts (15 men and 4 women) have been treated to date. All patients had symptomatic disease and required therapy. The median number of lines of prior treatment was 3 (range 1 – 5) including included rituximab, nucleoside analogues (fludarabine or 2-CDA), combination chemotherapy (e.g. CHOP, CVP), chloramucil, and bortezomib. The median IgM at baseline was 3330 mg/dL (range 1010– 7410). The median follow on RAD001 was 8 months (range 3 – 22 months). Eighteen pts are currently evaluable for response. Best responses to RAD001 after 2 cycles using IgM monoclonal protein were as follows: partial remission in 8 (44%), minimal response in 5 (28%). Progressive disease occurred in 4 (22%) and stable disease occurred in 1 (6%). The overall response rate (PR+MR) was 72%. The median duration of response has not been reached (3–22+ months). Patients tolerated therapy well without significant toxicities. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, grade 3 pneumonia in 1 patient, grade 3 hyperglycemia in 1 patient and grade 3 mucositis in 1 patient. Other adverse events of grade 2 or lower included nail cracking, mucositis, diarrhea, and fatigue. Attributable toxicities otherwise proved manageable with appropriate supportive care, and RAD001 was generally well tolerated. One patient enrolled on the study withdrew consent and changed to hospice care within 3 weeks of therapy, and passed away due to disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the oral RAD001 single agent RAD001 in patients with relapsed or refractory WM was welltolerated and demonstrated significant activity achieving an overall response rate in 72% of patients. Future studies of combination of this agent with rituximab and bortezomib are currently being planned.

A Phase II Trial of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus (RAD001) in Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 587-587
Author(s):  
Irene M Ghobrial ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
John Camoriano ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Waldenström’S Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Abstract Abstract 587 Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway controls cell proliferation and survival. Everolimus is an oral agent targeting raptor mTOR (mTORC1). The trial's goal was to determine the anti-tumor activity and safety of single-agent everolimus in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had measurable disease (IgM monoclonal protein >1000 mg/dL with >10% marrow involvement or nodal masses >2 cm), a platelet count ≥75,000 × 106/L, a neutrophil count ≥1,000 × 106/L, and a creatinine and bilirubin ≤2x laboratory upper limit of normal. Patients received everolimus 10 mg PO daily and were evaluated monthly. Tumor response was assessed after cycles 2 and 6 and then every 3 cycles until progression. Results: 50 pts were treated. The median age was 63 years (range, 43-85). The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 70% (95% CI: 55-82%), with a PR of 42% and 28% MR. The median duration of response and median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. The estimated PFS at 6 and 12 months is 75% (95%CI: 64-89%) and 62% (95%CI: 48-80%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher related toxicities were observed in 56% of patients. The most common were hematological toxicities with cytopenias. Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 10% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity occurred in 52% of patients. Conclusions: Everolimus has high single-agent activity with an overall response rate of 70% and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed WM, and offers a potential new therapeutic strategy for this patient group. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Treon:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding.

Update of the NCI multiinstitutional phase II trial of romidepsin, FK228, for patients with cutaneous or peripheral T-cell lymphoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8027-8027 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Piekarz ◽  
R. Frye ◽  
J. Wright ◽  
W. Figg ◽  
S. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Prior Therapy

8027 Background: The histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) are a class of differentiating agents undergoing clinical testing. Like other HDIs, romidepsin (FK228) modulates expression of genes involved in cell cycle regulation and markers of differentiation in cancer cell lines, leading to induction of differentiation or apoptosis. Romidepsin has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with T-cell lymphoma. Methods: Patients with CTCL (42) or PTCL (36) were enrolled in the NCI multi-institutional trial and assigned to cohorts based on extent of prior therapy and pathology. Romidepsin is administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 d cycle with a starting dose of 14mg/m2. Responses for patients with PTCL are measured using Cheson criteria, and CTCL using RECIST criteria. Results: Cohort one, composed of 27 patients who had previously received no more than 2 prior cytotoxic regimens of chemotherapy, has completed enrollment. Responses observed include 3 patients with CR and 7 patients with partial responses, yielding an overall response rate of 37%. Of note, responses were observed independent of stage of disease. Among 18 patients with stage IV disease, 6 patients had a complete or partial response, including 3 patients with Sézary syndrome. When including patients with greater than 2 prior cytotoxic regimens, the overall response rate was 31%. A replicate arm has been opened with the goal of confirming the response rate observed in the first cohort. Response data have not been evaluated from this arm at this time. Responses observed in 36 patients with refractory or relapsed PTCL includes 3 patients with CR and 8 patients with partial responses, comprising an overall response rate of 30%. Responses were observed independent of prior therapy, with some patients having undergone prior stem-cell transplant. Molecular endpoint analysis was performed on peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) and tumor biopsies from treated patients evaluating histone acetylation and changes in gene expression. Conclusions: Romidepsin as a single agent appears to have significant single agent activity in patients with CTCL and PTCL. Combination therapy with romidepsin may increase efficacy and should be pursued. This protocol remains open to accrual. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document