The Combination of 9-cis Retinoic Acid Plus MEK Inhibitor Induces Apoptosis Via Dephosphorylation of Retinoid X Receptor α in HL-60R Cells.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1927-1927
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Kanemura ◽  
Hisashi Tsurumi ◽  
Senji Kasahara ◽  
Takeshi Hara ◽  
Toshiki Yamada ◽  
...  

Abstract Resistance against retinoic acid (RA) is a serious problem of differentiation-induction therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in clinical practice. RA exerts its biological activities primarily through the nuclear receptor dimmer, consisting of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoid X receptor (RXR). Both receptors consist of three subtypes (α, β and γ) and form heterodimeric RAR/RXR and homodimeric RXR/RXR complexes. 9-cis RA, which is a high-affinity ligand for RXR but also binds to RAR, induces cell differentiation in wild type HL-60 human myeloid leukemia cells. However, in HL-60R cells, the RA-resistant subclone of HL-60, 9-cis RA can not induce cell differentiation and apoptosis. We recently reported that malfunction of RXRα due to posttranslational modification by phosphorylation to be associated with carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Phosphorylated form of RXRα (p-RXRα) at serine 260 by Ras/MAPK is resistant to ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated degradation and the accumulation of p-RXRα interferes with the function of remaining normal RXRα in a dominant negative manner, thereby promoting growth of HCC cells. We also found that in the presence of MEK inhibitor PD98059, 9-cis RA can induce the degradation of p-RXRα and thus restoring the function of this receptor in RXRα-phosphorylated human HCC cells. Based on the results as described above, we initiated this study to examine whether 9-cis RA can exert growth inhibitory effects on RA-resistant HL-60R cells when combined with MEK inhibitor, with focusing on the inhibition of expression of p-RXRα protein. We found that RXRα protein was originally expressed in both HL-60 and HL-60R cells, and that the expression level of RXRα protein was inhibited by about 60% and 20%, respectively, when those cells were treated with 0.5 μM 9-cis RA. Not only total RXRα protein, but also the level of p-RXRα protein was constitutively expressed in both HL-60 and HL-60R cells, and was significantly decreased in HL-60 cells by treatment with 9-cis RA alone. On the other hand, in HL-60R cells, 9-cis RA alone nor 20 μM PD98059 alone did not cause a down regulation of these proteins. However, when HL-60R cells were treated with the combination of 9-cis RA plus PD98059, the expression level of p-RXRα protein was markedly decreased. Moreover, the combination of these agents induced apoptosis in HL-60R cells, whereas similar effect was not obtained when the cells were treated with either agent alone. The combined treatment of these agents also cooperatively inhibited the growth of HL-60 R cells. The present findings suggest that the accumulation of p-RXRα might impair the function of normal RXRα as a master regulator of nuclear receptors and, thus, contributing to the resistance to RA in HL-60R cells. Combination of 9-cis RA plus MEK inhibitor might be an effective regimen for patients with RA resistant APL.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 6481-6487 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Roy ◽  
R Taneja ◽  
P Chambon

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR)-retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimers bind to cognate response elements in vitro more efficiently than do RAR or RXR homodimers, and both RAR and RXR partners have been shown to activate various promoters in transiently transfected cells. We have now investigated whether ligand-dependent activation of both heterodimeric partners is involved in induced expression of endogenous RA-responsive genes and in P19 and F9 cell differentiation. On their own, low concentrations of retinoids selective for either RAR alpha, RAR beta, or RAR gamma did not induce or very inefficiently induced the expression of several RA target genes or triggered differentiation. An RXR-specific synthetic retinoid was similarly inefficient at any concentration. In contrast, at the same concentrations, various combinations of RAR (RAR alpha, RAR beta, or RAR gamma) and RXR selective retinoids resulted in synergistic induction of all retinoic acid (RA) target genes examined, as well as in cell differentiation. However, the magnitude of this synergistic activation varied depending on both the RAR-RXR combination and the promoter context of the responsive genes. Promiscuous activation of the three RARs, or concomitant activation of RAR alpha and RAR gamma, at selective retinoid concentrations also resulted in induction of gene expression and cell differentiation. Taken together, our results are consistent with the conclusion that the RAR and RXR partners of RAR-RXR heterodimers can synergistically activate transcription of RA-responsive genes and can induce differentiation of P19 and F9 cells. Our results also indicate that there is a significant degree of functional redundancy between the three RAR types which, however, varies with the nature of the RA target genes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Ikeda ◽  
Remco A Spanjaard ◽  
Elizabeth W Noordhoek ◽  
Akio Kawaguchi ◽  
Toshimasa Onaya ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 203 (4) ◽  
pp. 821-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Matsushita ◽  
Pier Paolo Scaglioni ◽  
Mantu Bhaumik ◽  
Eduardo M. Rego ◽  
Lu Fan Cai ◽  
...  

The promyelocytic leukemia–retinoic acid receptor α (PML-RARα) protein of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is oncogenic in vivo. It has been hypothesized that the ability of PML-RARα to inhibit RARα function through PML-dependent aberrant recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and chromatin remodeling is the key initiating event for leukemogenesis. To elucidate the role of HDAC in this process, we have generated HDAC1–RARα fusion proteins and tested their activity and oncogenicity in vitro and in vivo in transgenic mice (TM). In parallel, we studied the in vivo leukemogenic potential of dominant negative (DN) and truncated RARα mutants, as well as that of PML-RARα mutants that are insensitive to retinoic acid. Surprisingly, although HDAC1-RARα did act as a bona fide DN RARα mutant in cellular in vitro and in cell culture, this fusion protein, as well as other DN RARα mutants, did not cause a block in myeloid differentiation in vivo in TM and were not leukemogenic. Comparative analysis of these TM and of TM/PML−/− and p53−/− compound mutants lends support to a model by which the RARα and PML blockade is necessary, but not sufficient, for leukemogenesis and the PML domain of the fusion protein provides unique functions that are required for leukemia initiation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document