A Phase I Study of Oral 6-Thioguanine, Followed by Continuous Infusion Cytarabine, Followed by Intramuscular PEG-Asparaginase (“TGAP”) in Children with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4536-4536
Author(s):  
Cecilia H. Fu ◽  
Janet L. Franklin ◽  
Paul Gaynon ◽  
Colleen McCarthy ◽  
Edward Panosyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Background: We found enhanced cytotoxicity against human leukemia cell lines resistant to cytarabine with the sequence specific three-drug combination, 6-thioguanine (6TG) + cytarabine + PEG-asparaginase (“TGAP”) [Fu et al, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 48:123–133, 2001] and developed a Phase I study to evaluate TGAP’s feasibility in children with relapsed/refractory leukemia or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with marrow involvement. Patients and Methods: Three days of twice daily 6TG was followed by cytarabine @ 487 mg/m2 loading dose and 126 mg/m2/hr by 72-hour continuous infusion. Cytarabine was followed by pegylated asparaginase @ 2,500 units/m2. Complete response (CR) required fewer than 5% marrow blasts with recovery of neutrophils and platelets. Partial response required marrow blasts between 5% and 25% with no peripheral blasts. Results: Between April 1999-January 2006, 11 patients, age 1 to 18 years, were enrolled after local IRB approval and individual or parental informed consent. Six patients had relapsed/refractory ALL, 4 patients had relapsed ANLL (2/4 had Down syndrome) and 1 patient had relapsed Burkitt’s lymphoma/leukemia. Six patients were enrolled at dose level #1 (6TG @ 100mg/m2/dose) and 5 patients were enrolled at dose level #2 (6-TG @ 150mg/m2/dose). The last patient enrolled was later found ineligible, but was included for toxicity. Chemotherapy was well tolerated in 9 patients. All patients developed grade 3–4 neutropenic fevers or bacteremia. Other grade 3–4 toxicities included transient elevations in transaminases. Asparaginase related pancreatitis occurred in two patients, in one with symptoms. Dose limiting acute vascular leak syndrome occurred in two patients at dose level #2 during the cytarabine infusion and just after the completion of therapy. Both required mechanical ventilation but recovered fully. Complete responses (CR) occurred in 2 of 10 evaluable patients and partial response (PR) occurred in 2 for total response rate (CR + PR) of 40%. All four responders tolerated a second course of TGAP. Both CR patients subsequently underwent matched unrelated BMT with no veno-occlusive disease or other excessive toxicity. In one CR patient, ara-CTP incorporation in the patients leukemic blasts ex vivo studied at baseline, pre chemotherapy, and repeated after 6TG and a 24-hour infusion of cytarabine showed a four-fold increase in intracellular ara-CTP, confirming our previous work in cell lines. Conclusions: TGAP is a feasible combination for patients with relapsed leukemias. A phase II study is currently under development using the maximum tolerated dose for 6TG of 100mg/m2/dose in combination with CI ara-C and IM PEG-asparaginase.

scholarly journals Phase I study of the 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate (lutathera) in combination with nivolumab in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000980
Author(s):  
Chul Kim ◽  
Stephen V Liu ◽  
Deepa S Subramaniam ◽  
Tisdrey Torres ◽  
Massimo Loda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Atypical Carcinoid ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

BackgroundLutathera is a 177Lutetium-labeled somatostatin analog approved for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Somatostatin receptors are expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, may act synergistically with lutathera to generate antitumor immunity. We conducted a phase I study of lutathera plus nivolumab in patients with advanced NETs of the lung.MethodsPatients with relapsed/refractory extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), non-progressing ES-SCLC after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, or advanced grade I-II pulmonary NETs were eligible. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The phase I portion followed a standard 3+3 design, assessing two dose levels (dose level 1: lutathera 3.7 GBq every 8 weeks for four doses with nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks; dose level 2: lutathera 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks for four doses with nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks).ResultsNine patients were enrolled (six ES-SCLC, two pulmonary atypical carcinoid, one high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at dose level 1. At dose level 2, one patient with refractory ES-SCLC developed a DLT (grade 3 rash). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were lymphopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=4), anemia (n=3), and nausea (n=3). The most common grade 3 TRAE was lymphopenia (n=4). Among the seven patients with measurable disease, one patient with ES-SCLC had a partial response. Two patients with pulmonary atypical carcinoid had stable disease lasting 6 months. The RP2D was dose level 2.ConclusionsLutathera plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed signs of antitumor activity. This combination warrants further exploration.Trial registration numberNCT03325816

A phase I study of hyperfractionated low-dose radiotherapy (RT) as a chemotherapy sensitizer in combination with gemcitabine (G) and erlobtinib (E) in advanced pancreatic cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 268-268
Author(s):  
Andre A. Konski ◽  
Joshua E. Meyer ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Anthony Frank Shields ◽  
Michael J. Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

268 Background: G can sensitize pancreatic cancer (PC) to radiotherapy (RT). However, this approach requires lower doses of G and thus delays aggressive systemic treatment, which may lead to distant failure. In preclinical models, hyperfractionated low-dose RT sensitizes PC cells to G and erlotinib. We thus initiated a Phase I trial combining hyperfractionated low-dose RT combined with full dose G and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, E, in the treatment of patients with advanced PC. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic PC confined to the abdomen and an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1, who had received 0-1 prior regimens (without G or E) and no prior RT were enrolled to successive cohorts in a 3+3 design. Patients were treated in 21 day cycles with G IV days 1 & 8, E once PO QD, and twice daily RT fractions separated by at least 4 hours on days 1, 2, 8, and 9. Whole abdominal RT fields were used. Dosing cohorts were as follows (G in mg per m2, E in mg, XRT/fraction in cGy): 1 (1,000, 100, 40), 2 (1,000, 100, 50), 3 (1,000, 100, 60), 4 (1,000, 150, 60). Primary endpoint was to define dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: A total of 27 pts, (median age 64 yrs and 15 male), were enrolled between 11/24/08 and 4/12/12. 17 patients had a PS of 1. The majority of patients were stage IV. Seven pts were enrolled in dose level 1, with 1 pt experiencing a DLT of grade 3 ileus, 3 pts enrolled each in dose levels 2-4 without DLT and 11 pts enrolled in the expanded portion of level 4. Best response by RECIST in 24 evaluable pts and was as follows: partial response 8, stable disease 15 and progressive disease 1. One pt initially found to be unresectable at surgery was subsequently resected with only minimal microscopic residual disease. The majority of grade 3 toxicities were hematologic with 1 grade 5 bowel perforation in dose level 1 in cycle 4. Conclusions: This phase I study combining low-dose hyperfractionated RT as a sensitizer to full dose G plus E was well tolerated with the majority of pts experiencing either a partial response or stable disease. This represents a novel strategy worthy of further investigation in pts with advanced PC. Clinical trial information: NCT00761345.

Phase I Study of the Humanized Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody Dacetuzumab in Refractory or Recurrent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (26) ◽  
pp. 4371-4377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Joseph D. Rosenblatt ◽  
Anas Younes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of dacetuzumab in patients with refractory or recurrent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).Patients and MethodsIn this open-label, dose-escalation phase I study, dacetuzumab was administered to six cohorts of adult patients. In the first cohort, patients received 2 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks; in all other cohorts, an intrapatient dose-escalation schedule was used with increasing doses up to a maximum of 8 mg/kg. Patients with clinical benefit after one cycle of dacetuzumab were eligible for a second cycle.ResultsIn the 50 patients who received dacetuzumab, no dose dependence of adverse events (AEs) was observed. The most common AEs in ≥ 20% of patients were fatigue, pyrexia, and headache; most were grade 1 or 2. Noninfectious inflammatory eye disorders occurred in 12% of patients. AEs grade ≥ 3 occurred in 30% of patients and included disease progression, anemia, pleural effusion, and thrombocytopenia. Most laboratory abnormalities were grade 1 or 2; transient elevated hepatic aminotransferases occurred in 52% of patients. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity: grade 3 conjunctivitis and transient vision loss in cohort (1), and grade 3 ALT elevation in cohort IV. The MTD of dacetuzumab was not established at the dose levels tested. Six objective responses were reported (one complete response, five partial responses). Tumor size decreased in approximately one third of patients.ConclusionDacetuzumab monotherapy was well tolerated in patients with NHL in doses up to 8 mg/kg/wk. Preliminary response data are encouraging and support additional studies of dacetuzumab in this patient population.

Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), cisplatin and concurrent radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer: A phase I study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15130-15130
Author(s):  
T. Dipetrillo ◽  
D. Evans ◽  
P. Akerman ◽  
T. Miner ◽  
R. Millis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Radiation Enhancement ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

15130 Background: PPX is a conjugate of paclitaxel to a polyglutamate polymer. Preclinically, PPX demonstrated a radiation enhancement factor (REF) >7.0, versus 1.5–2.0 for paclitaxel. (Milas et al Int J Rad Onc 55:2003, Li et al. Clin Cancer Res 6:2000). The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of PPX was determined previously to be 70 mg/m2 /week with concurrent radiation. We initiated a phase I study of PPX, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation with patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with esophageal or gastric cancer receiving chemoradiation for locoregional control, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant treatment were eligible. All patients received radiation at a dose of 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions (5 fractions per week for 5 1/2 weeks), and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. PPX was given as a 10 minute infusion in escalating dosages prior to each cisplatin dose. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 hematologic toxicity, esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, or dehydration, or any other grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. Patients were enrolled in successive cohorts of three. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which no more than 2 of 6 patients have DLTs. Results: Eleven patients have been entered over 2 dose levels of PPX: 50 mg/m2 (six patients, dose level 1), and 60mg/m2 (5 patients, dose level 2). Five patients had esophageal cancer and six had gastric cancer. All histologies were adenocarcinomas. One of six patients treated at dose level had a DLT (esophagitis). Three of five patients had DLTs at dose level 2, including esophagitis, nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. Conclusions: PPX is a novel radiation sensitizer for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. The MTD for PPX is 50 mg/m2 /week in combination with cisplatin 25mg/ m2 /week for 6 weeks, and 50.4 Gy concurrent radiation for patients with esophagogastric cancer. A phase II study of PPX/cisplatin and radiation will be initiated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

FOLFOX and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) for advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase I study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258
Author(s):  
Howard Safran ◽  
Kevin Charpentier ◽  
Kimberly Perez ◽  
Kalyan Mantripragada ◽  
Trevor Clark Austin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

258 Background: FOLFIRINOX improves survival in advanced pancreatic cancer, however the contribution of irinotecan is uncertain. The addition of irinotecan to gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine alone in pancreatic cancer, however nab-P demonstrates a survival benefit. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the addition of nab-P to fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-A). Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior treatment received oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 with 3 dose levels of nab-P (125, 150 and 175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. Pegfilgrastim was required during the first 2 cycles. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the first 2 cycles of treatment. Results: Fifteen patients were entered: Dose level 1 (n=6), dose level 2 (N=6), dose level 3 (N=3). The median age was 64 (35-81). Ten patients had metastatic and 5 had locally advanced disease. DLTs of nausea and fatigue occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose level 3. Two patients developed grade 3 neuropathy after >= 10 cycles of treatment. One patient had grade 3/4 neutropenia. Eight of fifteen patients (53%) had a partial response. Conclusions: The MTD of nab-P is 150mg/m2 every 2 weeks with FOLFOX. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy, similar to other FOLFOX regimens, is the most significant toxicity generally occurring after >= 10 cycles of treatment. FOLFOX-A has substantial activity and may represent a promising regimen in pancreatic cancer. Patients are currently being accrued to an expansion phase utilizing dose level 2. Supported by the Davis and Browning families and LIFEcycle. Clinical trial information: NCT01744353.

A phase I trial of plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium (BTCRC-LUN17-127) study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8570-8570
Author(s):  
Jyoti Malhotra ◽  
Nasser H. Hanna ◽  
Alberto Chiappori ◽  
Lawrence Eric Feldman ◽  
Naomi Fujioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

8570 Background: Plinabulin (BPI-2358) is a vascular disrupting agent with immune-enhancing function by inducing dendritic cell maturation and decreasing regulatory T cells. Preclinical studies report that plinabulin potentiates the cytotoxicity of dual checkpoint inhibition (CPI) with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Plinabulin may also reduce immune-related AEs from CPI through its phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitory activity which is associated with anti-inflammatory effects. We report initial results from a Phase I study assessing plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Methods: In this dose-escalation phase I study, patients with extensive-stage SCLC who had progressed on or after prior platinum-based chemotherapy (±CPI) were enrolled using a 3+3 design. The primary objective was to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT’s) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg), ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and plinabulin (as per dose escalation schema) IV on day 1 of each 21 day cycles. After completion of 4 cycles, patients continued therapy with nivolumab (240 mg) and plinabulin every 2 weeks till progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients were evaluable for DLT if they received at least 2 cycles of therapy; DLT period was defined as the first 6 weeks from C1D1. Secondary endpoints were ORR, PFS and frequency of irAEs. Correlative analysis included inflammatory biomarkers: hsCRP, ESR, SAA and haptoglobin. Results: Between 9/2018 and 11/2020, 17 patients were enrolled (1 patient withdrew consent before treatment, 16 were evaluable for safety). Median age was 59 years (range 43 to 78); 9 patients were male and 10 had received prior CPI. Eight patients were treated at dose-level 1 of plinabulin (20 mg/m2) and 8 patients at 30 mg/m2 of plinabulin (level 2); dose-level 2 was determined to be RP2D. There were 2 DLTs; 1 at dose-level 1 (grade 3 altered mental status lasting < 24 hours) and 1 at dose-level 2 (grade 3 infusion reaction). The most common treatment-related AEs (all grades) were nausea (10; 63%), infusion reaction (8; 50%), vomiting (7; 44%), diarrhea (7; 44%) and fatigue (6, 32%). Seven patients (44%) had at least one grade 3 or higher treatment-related AE; there were no treatment-related deaths. Two patients (13%) had grade 3 or higher irAE requiring steroids (1 colitis, 1 transaminitis); both at dose-level 1. At data cutoff (12/30/20), there were 3 PRs in CPI naïve patients (3/6; 50%) and 2 PRs in evaluable CPI-resistant patients (2/7; 29%). In the two CPI-resistant patients with confirmed response, the tumor reduction was 68% and 52%. Conclusions: Plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab was safe and well tolerated. A phase 2 study in CPI-experienced patients with relapsed SCLC is planned to confirm the preliminary signals of clinical activity and reduced immune toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT03575793.

Phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) and letrozole in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13501-e13501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winston Tan ◽  
Jacob B Allred ◽  
Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia ◽  
Donald W. Northfelt ◽  
James N. Ingle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

e13501 Background: Loss of estrogen receptor alpha gene expression has been associated with insensitivity to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer patients. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have recently been found to restore sensitivity to the estrogen receptor by modulation of the estrogen and progesterone receptors. This had been shown with both aromatase and tamoxifen refractory and in triple negative cell lines . We performed a Phase I study of the combination of LBH589 (panobinostat) and letrozole to evaluate safety and tolerability in patients with metastatic breast cancer prior to the performance of a phase II trial. Methods: We enrolled postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, ECOG PS 0 or 1, ANC>1500/mm3, platelets>100,000/mm3, normal total bilirubin, and ALT/AST adequate laboratory tests were eligible. Letrozole dose was 2.5 mg/day orally. Dose of LBH589: Level 1, 20 mg orally three times weekly; Level 2, 30 mg orally three times a week. Results: 12 patients (dose level 1:6 patients, dose level 2: 6 patients) have been enrolled. 43 cycles of treatment have been given to these12 patients. Initial cohort of 3 patients at the 20 mg dose level had no dose limiting toxicity (DLT). At the 30 mg dose level 3/6 patients had DLT (thrombocytopenia grade 1: 2 pts; grade 3:1 pt; grade 4: 1 pt; and diarrhea grade 3: 1 pt. One pt at the 30 mg dose level has a confirmed partial response and remains on study after 6 cycles of treatment. Subsequent cohort of 3 patients had 1 dose DLT with doubling of the creatinine. The main DLT was thrombocytopenia in 3/6 pts at the 30 mg dose level. Conclusions: The recommended dose for phase II testing of LBH589 is 20 mg orally 3 times per week in combination with standard dose letrozole.

scholarly journals EPCT-17. A PHASE I AND SURGICAL STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS IN CHILDREN WITH RECURRENT OR REFRACTORY MALIGNANT BRAIN TUMORS: PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR CONSORTIUM INTERIM REPORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Olivia Campagne ◽  
Tong Lin ◽  
Haitao Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and PI3K pathway are commonly observed in recurrent childhood brain tumors. Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus was determined in the Phase I study and ribociclib concentrations were characterized in plasma and tumor in children undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Following resection, eligible patients were enrolled in the Phase I study according to a rolling 6 design and received ribociclib and everolimus once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively. Patients undergoing surgery received ribociclib at the pediatric RP2D (350 mg/m2/day) for 7–10 days pre-operatively. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on both cohorts and analyzed in nine patients on phase I study. Sixteen eligible patients enrolled on phase I study (median age 10.3 years; range: 3.9–20.4) and 5 patients were enrolled on the surgical cohort (median age 11.4 years; range: 7.2–17.1). Six patients enrolled at dose level 1 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Two of the three patients at dose level 2 experienced DLT (grade 3 hypertension and grade 4 ALT). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia, neutropenia, and leucopenia. Everolimus concentrations following administration of everolimus alone were lower than those following drug combination, suggesting an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus in recurrent CNS tumors is 120 mg/m2 and 1.2 mg/ m2 daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively.

Phase I Study of Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin and Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine (ARA-C) in Patients (PTS) with Relapsed and Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Myeloid Blast Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1809-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajolil ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Farhad Ravandi-Kashani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Acute Leukemias ◽  
First Remission ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Phase I and II clinical studies demonstrated activity of Clofarabine in acute leukemias. In previous studies we have investigated clofarabine, plus ara-C combinations and reported a CR rate of 24% in relapsed AML and 52% in previously untreated AML ≥ 50 years (yrs) with acceptable toxicity profile. Anthracyclines are active in AML. To explore clofarabine further in AML combinations we conducted a phase I study of clofarabine with idarubicin with or without ara-C in pts with relapsed AML, MDS, and CML. Considered as dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are ≥ grade 3 drug-related toxicities. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined by “3+3” dose escalation scheme. On the clofarabine (C)/idarubicin (I) combination (CI), 9 AML pts are enrolled (2 primary refractory, 7 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs (range 24–71). Median first remission duration (CRD1): 3.1 mos. (0–7.6). For the first dose level, C was given at 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d and I at 12mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d. Among the first 6 pts, 2 ≥ gr. 3 toxicities (diarrhea, rash, ↑ bili) occurred necessitating dose de-escalation of C to 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5 and I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3. Among 3 pts, 1 ≥ gr.3 toxicity (↑ bili) was observed. No responses occurred. On the CI + ara-C arm (CIA), 7 AML pts are enrolled (1 primary refractory, 6 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs. (24–78). Median CRD1: 11.2 mos. (0–13.1). First dose level: C 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 1g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 3 pts, 2 developed ≥ gr.3 toxicities (↑ bili, diarrhea) leading to the following de-escalation: C 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 6mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 0.75g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 4 pts (1 ≥ gr. 3 rash, ↑ bili), 3 pts achieved CR. The phase I study is ongoing until determination of DLT and MTD for each arm. Our preliminary results indicate clinical activity of CIA even at the low dose level.

Phase I Study of AVE9633, an AntiCD33-Maytansinoid Immunoconjugate, Administered as an Intravenous Infusion in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4548-4548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Giles ◽  
Rodica Morariu-Zamfir ◽  
John Lambert ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Disulfide Bonds ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Specific Tumor ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract AVE9633 is an immunoconjugate created by conjugation of the cytotoxic maytansinoid, DM4, to the monoclonal IgG1 antibody, huMy9-6 (average of 3.5 molecules of DM4 per antibody). The huMy9-6 antibody is a humanized version of a murine monoclonal antibody, My9-6, which is specific for the CD33 antigen expressed on the surface of myeloid cells, including the majority of cases of AML. Because CD33 has little expression outside the hematopoietic system, it represents an attractive target for antibody-based therapy in patients with AML. The humanized antibody, huMy9-6, binds to the CD33 antigen with an apparent KD in the range of 10−10 M. Maytansinoids are anti-mitotics that inhibit tubulin polymerization and microtubule assembly, inhibiting cells during the G2/M phase of the mitotic cycle. In order to link maytansinoids to antibodies via disulfide bonds, a new thiol-containing maytansinoid (DM4) was synthesized. Attachment of potent maytansinoids to an antibody via disulfide bonds provides a satisfactory stability in the bloodstream. After the conjugate is bound at the specific tumor site it is internalized and the cytotoxic agent is released within the target cell. A phase I study of AVE9633 is being conducted in patients with refractory/relapsed CD33+ AML. The study regimen consists of AVE9633 IV infusion on Day 1 of a 3 weeks cycle. To date dose levels of 15 (N=3), 30 (N=5), 50 (N=4), 75 (N=4), 105 (N=2), 200 (N=3) and 260 (N=1) mg/m2 have been investigated. Hypersensitivity reactions during perfusion were noted, requiring prophylaxis with steroids. No other AVE9633- attributable extramedullary Grade 3 AE has been observed to date. Free DM4, measured by LC/MS/MS was detectable from the 75 mg/m2 dose level; its Cmax (at the end of infusion) increased from 10 ng/mL at the 75 mg/m2 dose level to 70 ng/mL at 200 mg/m2. Neither AVE9633-associated myelosuppression nor responses have been noted. Using Flow Cytometry Assay on peripheral blasts and monocytes, total saturation and down regulation of CD33 were observed following administration of doses ≥ 30 mg/m2. AVE9633 exposure (measuring, by ELISA method, all antibodies containing at lease one molecule of DM4) increased proportionally with the administered dose in the dose range 15 to 200 mg/m2. Updated PK results and potential explanations for the lack of efficacy using this treatment schedule will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document