Darbepoietin in Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): A Pilot Study.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5101-5101
Author(s):  
Anna Chierichini ◽  
Barbara Anaclerico ◽  
Paola Anticoli Borza ◽  
Susanna Fenu ◽  
Carolina Nobile ◽  
...  

Abstract In patients undergoing ASCT, RBC transfusions are depending on donor availability and correlated with early and late side effects such as immune reactions and infections. Three weeks long acting Darbepoietin is currently available, but its role in ASCT in terms of efficacy, safety and cost has not yet been established. Aim: This pilot study was activated in ASCT patients to test the impact of Darbepoietin on the haemoglobin level; RBC transfusion requirement; the total cost of Darbepoietin therapy during the first 30 days after ASCT. Material and methods. From September 2006 to June 2007, 10 patients - 5 males, median age 57 years (range 20–71) - with Multiple Myeloma (MM n=7) in 1st response, Non-Hodgkin (NHL n=2) and Hodgkin (HL n=1) Lymphoma in 2nd complete remission entered the study. As conditioning regimens, the patients received Mel 200 (n=8) or BEAM (n=2). Baseline Hb and Epo median values were: 12,1g/L (range 10.3 – 16.2 g/L), and 28.7mU/mL (range, 4.1–220 mU/L), respectively. The median value of CD34+ cells infused was 4.99 x109/L (range 3.04 – 5.07) and the median time to engraftment was 10 days (range 8–11). To prevent anaemia, patients were given i.c. single dose 500 U Darbepoietin on day +1, associated with iron therapy and B12 vitamin /weekly, plus folinic acid and B6 vitamin/daily. RBC transfusion was mandatory for Hb level ≤ 8g/L. Results: At day +30, in 9/10 patients (7 MM, 1 NHL and 1HL) the median Hb value was 13.2 g/L (range 10.2 – 15.1g/L), and none of them were transfused. Only 1 NHL received 1 RBC unit on day +7 because of Hb was 8g/L; in this case, the baseline dosage of Epo was high (220 mU/L). On the follow-up (median time 4 months, range 1–11), no thromboembolic events or other side effects occurred. Finally, in our Country the price of 1 vial Darbepoietin and 1 RBC transfusion (packed, filtered and irradiated) is 744.60 and 340 euro, respectively. Therefore,, the cost of the entire supportive therapy in our 10 patients has been 7.786 euro. Comments Despite the small number of patients, from this pilot study we can drawn the conclusion that Darbepoietin seems an effective and safe therapy and could represent an appropriate support in ASCT patients with baseline low/normal Epo level. Only a prospective, randomized study on a large number of patients will be able to answer the question on the Darbepoietin cost-efficacy in ASCT.

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2020-200962
Author(s):  
Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson ◽  
Ali Kubba ◽  
Cecilia Caetano ◽  
Thomas Faustmann ◽  
Eeva Lukkari-Lax ◽  
...  

Universal access to sexual and reproductive health services is essential to facilitate the empowerment of women and achievement of gender equality. Increasing access to modern methods of contraception can reduce the incidence of unplanned pregnancy and decrease maternal mortality. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) offer high contraceptive efficacy as well as cost-efficacy, providing benefits for both women and healthcare systems. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) first became available in 1990 with the introduction of Mirena (LNG-IUS 20), a highly effective contraceptive which can reduce menstrual blood loss and provide other therapeutic benefits. The impact of the LNG-IUS on society has been wide ranging, including decreasing the need for abortion, reducing the number of surgical sterilisation procedures performed, as well as reducing the number of hysterectomies carried out for issues such as heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mirena can provide a treatment option for women with gynaecological issues such as HMB without organic pathology, minimising exposure to the hospital environment and reducing waiting times for surgical appointments. Looking to the future, research and development in the field of the LNG-IUS continues to expand our understanding of these contraceptives in clinical practice and offers the potential to further expand the choices available to women, allowing them to select the option that best meets their needs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Howard Huaihan Pai ◽  
Tom Pickles ◽  
Mira Keyes ◽  
Stuart Jones ◽  
Rachel E. McDonald ◽  
...  

Introduction: We sought to compare the rate of return of testosteronelevels and sexual function in men with prostate cancerreceiving longer acting, 3-month preparation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (L-LHRH-A) versus shorter acting,1-month preparation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormoneagonist (S-LHRH-A).Methods and Materials: Men with low to intermediate risk localizedprostate cancer were randomized to either L-LHRH-A (2-3 monthduration LHRH-A) or S-LHRH-A (6-1 month duration LHRH-A) ofandrogen suppression therapy (AST) and prostate brachytherapyusing iodine-125 radioisotopes. Serum total testosterone levels andPSA were recorded every 2 months for 2 years.Results: A planned target sample size of 100 was not achieveddue to insufficient accrual. A total of 55 patients were randomizedand 46 were used for analysis. The median time to recovery oftestosterone to baseline levels (calculated from end of AST) was 8and 4 months in the L-LHRH-A and S-LHRH-A arms, respectively(p = 0.268). The median time to testosterone recovery to lower limitof reference range was 4 and 2 months respectively (p = 0.087).Interpretation: This randomized study, which failed to reachaccrual target, showed a trend towards more rapid recovery oftestosterone levels using shorter acting LHRH-A. Another randomizedstudy would be required to validate these findings. Currently,there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of shorteracting LHRH-A as a means of providing more rapid recovery oftestosterone levels.Introduction : Nous avons voulu comparer la vitesse de retourdes taux de testostérone et de la fonction sexuelle chez des hommesatteints d’un cancer de la prostate recevant un agoniste de laLHRH à longue durée d’action pendant 3 mois ou un agoniste dela LHRH à courte durée d’action pendant 1 mois.Matériel et méthodologie : Des hommes atteints d’un cancer dela prostate localisé avec risque faible à intermédiaire ont été randomiséspour recevoir soit un agoniste de la LHRH à longue duréed’action (2 doses trimestrielles) soit un antagoniste de la LHRHà courte durée d’action (6 doses mensuelles) comme traitementantiandrogène et une brachythérapie prostatique avec des radioisotopesde l’iode 125. Les taux sériques de testostérone totale etd’APS ont été notés tous les 2 mois pendant 2 ans.Résultats : L’échantillon prévu au départ de 100 patients n’apu être obtenu en raison d’un recrutement insuffisant. Au total,55 patients ont été randomisés et 46 ont été inclus dans les analyses.L’intervalle médian de retour à des taux normaux de testostérone(calculés à partir de la fin du traitement antiandrogène) étaitde 8 et 4 mois dans les groupes sous agoniste de la LHRH à longueet à courte durée d’action, respectivement (p = 0,268). L’intervallemédian requis pour que les taux de testostérone atteignent la limiteinférieure des valeurs de référence était de 4 et 2 mois, respectivement(p = 0,087).Interprétation : Cette étude randomisée, où on n’a pas réussi àobtenir le nombre de patients voulu, a montré une tendance vers unretour plus rapide des taux de testostérone avec un traitement paragoniste de la LHRH à courte durée d’action. Une autre étude randomiséeserait nécessaire pour valider ces résultats. Actuellement,on ne dispose pas de suffisamment de données pour recommanderun agoniste de la LHRH à courte durée d’action comme moyenpour ramener les taux de testostérone plus rapidement à la normale.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 775-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishi Gupta ◽  
Marissa Manuel ◽  
Kumiko Owada ◽  
Samish Dhungana ◽  
Leslie Busby ◽  
...  

IntroductionWith the publication of the recent trials showing the tremendous benefits of mechanical thrombectomy, opportunities exist to refine prehospital processes to identify patients with larger stroke syndromes.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who were brought via scene flight from rural parts of the region to our institution, from December 1, 2014 to June 5, 2015, with severe hemiparesis or hemiplegia. We assessed the accuracy of the diagnosis of stroke and the number of patients requiring endovascular therapy. Moreover, we reviewed the times along the pathway of patients who were treated with endovascular therapy.Results45 patients were brought via helicopter from the field to our institution. 27 (60%) patients were diagnosed with an ischemic stroke. Of these, 12 (26.7%) were treated with mechanical thrombectomy and 6 (13.3%) with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone. An additional three patients required embolization procedures for either a dural arteriovenous fistula or cerebral aneurysm. Thus a total of 15 (33%) patients received an endovascular procedure and 21/45 (46.7%) received an acute treatment. For patients treated with thrombectomy, the median time from first medical contact to groin puncture was 101 min, with 8 of the 12 patients (66.7%) being discharged to home.ConclusionsWe have presented a pilot study showing that severe hemiparesis or hemiplegia may be a reasonable prehospital tool in recognizing patients requiring endovascular treatment. Patients being identified earlier may be treated faster and potentially improve outcomes. Further prospective controlled studies are required to assess the impact on outcomes and cost effectiveness using this methodology.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Guntz ◽  
C Vasseur ◽  
D Ifrim ◽  
A Louvard ◽  
J F Fils ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal 1% chloroprocaine with 2% hyperbaric prilocaine in the setting of ambulatory knee arthroscopy. We hypothesized that complete resolution of the sensory block was faster with chloroprocaine. Methods Eighty patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were included in this prospective randomized double-blind study. Spinal anesthesia was performed with either chloroprocaine (50 mg) or hyperbaric prilocaine (50 mg). Characteristics of sensory and motor blocks and side effects were recorded. Results Mean time to full sensory block recovery was shorter with chloroprocaine (169 (56.1) min vs 248 (59.4)). The characteristics of the sensory blocks were similar at the T12 dermatome level between the two groups. Differences appeared at T10: the percentage of patients with a sensory block was higher, onset quicker and duration longer with hyperbaric prilocaine. The number of patients with a sensory block at T4 dermatome level in both groups was minimal. Times to full motor recovery were identical in both groups (85 (70–99) vs 86 (76–111) min). Time to spontaneous voiding was shorter with chloroprocaine (203 (57.6) min vs 287.3 (47.2) min). Incidence of side effects was low in both groups. Conclusions When considering the characteristics of the sensory block, the use of chloroprocaine may allow an earlier discharge of patients. Cephalic extension was to a higher dermatomal level and the sensory block at T10 level was of prolonged duration with hyperbaric prilocaine, suggesting that the choice between the two drugs should also be performed based on the level of the sensory block requested by the surgery. This study is registered in the US National Clinical Trials Registry, registration number: NCT030389, the first of February 2017, Retrospectively registered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-588
Author(s):  
Rafael Melillo Laurino Neto ◽  
Fernando A. M. Herbella

SUMMARY Surgeons are becoming aware that surgical outcomes are not only based on technical skills. The impact of psychological problems on outcomes must be studied from both the patient's and the health care provider's viewpoint. Psychological problems may affect up to 20% of the population, with almost half of them non-treated. Surgeons have to deal with a significant number of patients with psychological problems, which affect surgical outcomes changing how symptoms, results and side effects are interpreted. Surgeons also face psychological problems at a significant rate. Although there are no studies on the effect of chronic psychological problems of the surgeon on outcomes, in simulated scenarios, acute stress usually leads to worse performance. Some initiatives can be implemented to improve outcomes based on the effect of psychological problems.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 832-832

The following are areas of priority for future work in pediatric cancer pain. ASSESSMENT AND METHODOLOGY 1. Research on the description, prevalence, and correlates of pediatric cancer pain. 2. Evaluation of the effects of coursework and workshops about pediatric cancer pain on professional practice. 3. Development and evaluation of the impact of quality assurance programs on the management of pain in childhood cancer. 4. Further refinement and validation of instruments to measure cancer pain in children. DISEASE-RELATED PAIN 1. Development of more convenient drug delivery systems, including transdermal application. 2. Development of new analgesics which provide relief of intense pain with fewer side effects than opioids that are currently available. In particular, agents that can relieve severe pain but produce less respiratory depression would be extremely useful for infants and patients with diminished respiratory reserve. 3. Development of more effective agents for management of side effects. For example, antiemetics for patients unable to tolerate phenothiazines or butyrophenones, or antipruritics for patients whose itching is refractory to antihistamines. 4. Comparisons of short-acting and long-acting oral analgesics in children. 5. Study of the importance of neuropathic pain in cancer pain in children and comparisons of the various treatments for neuropathic pain, including tricyclics and anticonvulsants. PROCEDURE-RELATED PAIN 1. Local anesthesia a. When should local anesthesia be used? b. What local anesthetics are most effective? c. Are anesthetic creams effective? d. What is the feasibility and efficacy of ionophoresis of lidocaine and other local an-esthetic delivery methods, including buffered lidocaine?


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13539-e13539
Author(s):  
Sharif Ahmed ◽  
Greg Kubicek

e13539 Background: Multi-disciplinary tumor boards (MTB) are a way to generate quality patient care by allowing different specialties to provide insight into patient care. While the vast majority of hospital systems have MTB there are several aspects of how to run the most efficient MTB. The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference in patients presented early versus late in MTB. Methods: At our institution we have disease specific weekly MTB. Patients are added to MTB based on order they are received (physicians or APN will send patient name to the disease specific nurse navigator). We recorded the time devoted to each patient and the number of providers that gave a comment or suggestion per patient. The time and number of comments were compared for patients presented at the start of MTB versus towards the end of MTB. Unpaired T test was used to compare time and comments. Results: We analyzed a total of 25 MTBs which corresponded to 241 patients. The median number of patients discussed per MTB was 9 (range 5 to 16). The median time spent per patient was 5.21 minutes and the median number of providers providing comments was 3 (range 1 to 9) with an average of 3.2. When analyzed by the first 8 patients versus the remainder, the median time spent was 6.1 minutes on the first 1-8 patients and 3.4 for > 8 (P < 0.0001). The mean number of comments was 3.4 for the first 1-8 patients and 2.4 for > 8 (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: We found that patients discussed towards the end of weekly MTB had less amount of time per devoted per patient and less discussion (as measured by number of providers supplying comments and suggestions). While the impact on long-term patient care is unclear we feel that this data is important in helping to ensure productive MTB discussions and avoid any arbitrary factor for reduced multidisciplinary insight. MTB should be cognitive of this time and attention biases.


2003 ◽  
Vol 61 (2A) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norberto L. Cabral ◽  
Carla Moro ◽  
Giana R. Silva ◽  
Rosana Herminia Scola ◽  
Lineu César Werneck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the impact of a stroke unit (SU) on acute phase treatment when compared to a conventional general ward treatment (GW). METHOD: Seventy-four patients with acute stroke were randomized between a SU and conventional general ward (GW). We compared both groups regarding the length of hospital stay, lethality and functional and clinical status within 6 months, using the Scandinavian scale and Barthel index. RESULTS: Thirty-five and thirty-nine patients were allocated at SU and GW, respectively. Lethality on the 10th day at SU and GW achieved 8.5% and 12.8% respectively (p= 0.41), whereas 30-days mortality rates achieved 14.2% and 28.2% (p= 0.24), 17.4% and 28.7% on the 3rd month (p= 0.39), and 25.7% and 30.7% on the 6th month (p= 0.41). Thirty-day survival curve achieved 1.8 log rank (p= 0.17), with a trend for lower lethality in the SU. In order to save one death in 6 months in SU, NNT (the number need to treat) was 20; to get one more home independent patient NNT was 15. No significant difference was found between the length of hospital stay and morbidity. CONCLUSION: No significant benefit was found in SU patients compared to GW group. However,an evident benefit in absolute numbers was observed in lethality, survival curve and NNT in thirty days period after stroke. Further collaborative studies or incresead number of patients are required to define the role of SU.


Author(s):  
José A. Oteo ◽  
Pedro Marco ◽  
Luis Ponce de León ◽  
Alejandra Roncero ◽  
Teófilo Lobera ◽  
...  

The new SARS-CoV-2 infection named COVID-19 has severely hit our Health System. At the time of writing this paper no medical therapy is officially recommended or has shown results in improving the outcomes in COVID-19 patients. With the aim of diminishing the impact in Hospital admissions and reducing the number of medical complications, we implemented a strategy based on a Hospital Home-Care Unit (HHCU) using an easy-to-use treatment based on an oral administration regimen outside the hospital with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus azithromycin (AZM) for a short period of 5 days. Patients and methods: Patients ≥ 18 years old visiting the emergency room at the Hospital Universitario San Pedro de Logrono (La Rioja) between March, 31st and April, 12th diagnosed with COVID-19 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by a specific PCR, as follows: Patients with pneumonia (CURB ≤ 1) who did not present severe comorbidities and had no processes that contraindicated this therapeutic regime. Olygosimptomatic patients without pneumonia aged ≥ 55 years. Patients ≥ 18 years old without pneumonia with significant comorbidities. We excluded patients with known allergies to some of the antimicrobials used and patients treated with other drugs that increase the QTc or with QTc >450msc. The therapeutic regime was: HCQ 400 mg every twice in a loading dose followed by 200 mg twice for 5 days, plus AZM 500 mg on the first day followed by 250 mg daily for 5 days. A daily telephone follow-up was carried out from the hospital by the same physician. The end-points of our study were: 1.- To measure the need for hospital admission within 15 days after the start of treatment. 2.- To measure the need to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 15 days after the start of the treatment. 3.- To describe the severity of the clinical complications developed. 4.- To measure the mortality within 30 days after starting treatment (differentiating if the cause is COVID-19 or something else). 5.-To describe the safety and adverse effects of the therapeutic regime. Results: During the 13 days studied a total of 502 patients were attended in the emergency room due to COVID-19. Forty-two were sent at home; 80 were attended by the HHCU (patients on this study) and 380 were admitted to the Hospital. In our series there were a group of 69 (85.18%) patients diagnosed with pneumonia (37 males and 32 females). Most of them, 57 (82.60%) had a CURB65 score of <1 (average age 49) and 12 (17.40%) a CURB score of 1 (average age 63). Eighteen (22.50%) of the pneumonia patients also had some morbidity as a risk factor. 11 patients (13.75%) without pneumonia were admitted to the HHCU because comorbidities or age ≥ 55 years. Six patients with pneumonia had to be hospitalized during the observation period, 3 of them because side effects and 3 because of worsening. One of these patients, with morbid obesity and asthma, had clinical worsening needing mechanical ventilation at ICU and developed acute distress respiratory syndrome. With the exception of the patient admitted to the ICU, the rest of the patients were discharged at home in the following 8 days (3 to 8 days). Twelve patients (15%), 11 of whom had pneumonia, experienced side effects affecting mainly the digestive. In another patient a QTc interval prolongation (452 msc) was observed. In total 3 of these patients had to be admitted in the Hospital, 2 because of vomiting and 1 because a QTc interval lengthening. None of the patients needed to stop the HCQ or AZM and all the 80 patients finished the therapeutic strategy. From the group without pneumonia only a patient developed diarrhea that did not require hospitalization or stop the medication. Conclusions: Our strategy has been associated with a reduction in the burden of hospital pressure, and it seems to be successful in terms of the number of patients who have developed serious complications and / or death. None of the patients died in the studied period and only 6 have to be admitted in conventional hospitalization area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document