Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients with p53 Deletion.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1724-1724
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Young Trieu ◽  
Hong Chang ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Investigational Drugs ◽  
Beta 2 Microglobulin

Abstract p53 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been reported in about 10% of newly diagnosed patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) and has been associated with a poor prognosis. Previous data from our centre has demonstrated that the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these pts after a single autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is only 16.9 and 48.2 months, respectively, compared to 24.4 and 76.6 mos, respectively, in all pts transplanted during the same time period (Mikhael et al, Blood2007; 110: abstract 953). Minimal information is available on the treatment (Tx) and course of these pts following disease progression. Therefore, we performed a retrospective review of all MM pts treated at our institution who were found to have p53 deletion. We identified 31 pts with relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) MM with this cytogenetic abnormality. At diagnosis, median age was 54 years (range, 31–70), hemoglobin 97 g/L (range, 67–149), creatinine 96 μmol/L (range, 28–1751), beta 2-microglobulin 314 nmol/L (range, 225–437), CRP 3 mg/L (range, 2–7) and LDH 205 U/L (range, 82–478); 58% were male. Immunoglobulin subtypes included: IgG (14 pts), IgA (8 pts), IgD (2 pts) and light chain only (7 pts). Concomitant cytogenetic abnormalities included 13q deletion in 68% and t(4;14) in 67% of pts evaluable. Thirty-nine percent developed plasma cell leukemia (PCL) at some point in the disease course, which was associated with a poor OS (p=0.005). All but 5 had undergone prior ASCT with a median time from diagnosis to ASCT of 8 (95% CI, 4–145) mos. Txs given for rel/ref MM consisted of the following regimens: thalidomide-based in 15, bortezomib-based in 12, lenalidomide-based in 11, alkylating agents in 9 and steroids only in 5 pts, and other regimens (D-PACE or investigational drugs) in 7 pts. The median follow-up from diagnosis in these pts is 45 (95% CI, 4–145) mos. The overall response rate (≥PR) (ORR), median PFS and median OS from the start of each regimen is shown below. Agent Median duration of Tx (mos) ORR(%) Median PFS (mos) Median OS (mos) Thalidomide 6.2 20% 5.0 11.9 Bortezomib 5.2 50% 5.6 36.1 Lenalidomide 10.6 60% 4.8 36.1 Alkylating agents 6.0 11% 5.1 30.0 Steroids 1.9 20% 1.9 33.4 Other 2.2 43% 6.3 33.4 We conclude: 1) Median PFS in pts with the p53 deletion is less than 6 months, with an OS of 2.5–3 yrs; 2) novel agents other than thalidomide produce the highest ORR in rel/ref MM with p53 deletion; 3) the short OS in the thalidomide group is likely related to the unavailability of other novel agents for subsequent relapses, as the majority of the pts were treated before 2004; 4) better strategies/drugs are required for these pts.

Weekly Cyclophosphamide and Alternate Day Prednisone: An Effective, Convenient and Well Tolerated Treatment for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4917-4917
Author(s):  
A. Keith Stewart ◽  
Young Trieu ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Greg Pond ◽  
Joseph Mikhael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Protein Reduction

Abstract Alkylating agents remain among the most potent therapies available for treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM). Their use prior to, or following, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is, however, compromised by concerns about stem cell quality and by myelosuppression limiting effective dose delivered. To address this concern we have studied a combination of cyclophosphamide 500 mg p.o. once weekly and prednisone 100 mg p.o. on alternate days in 66 patients requiring salvage therapy post-ASCT. Dose reductions were allowed for toxicity beginning at cycle 2. On an intent to treat basis, 66 patients received this regimen, however, 7 of these patients were not fully evaluable for response due to non-secretory disease. Of the 59 patients evaluable for response, the median time from transplant to treatment was 26.4 months (range, 6.0 to 66.6). The median time from post-transplant relapse to start of cyclophosphamide and prednisone (C/P) therapy was 1.4 months. The median number of therapies from time of diagnosis to C/P initiation was 2 (range, 1.0 to 5.0). At the date of analysis, treatment with C/P is ongoing in 12 (20.3%) patients, with a median duration of 3.6 months (range, 1.9 to 11.6). The 47 patients who have completed C/P therapy were treated for a median time of 5.5 months (range, 0.5 to 21.7). The reason for discontinuation among these 47 patients included disease progression (42.6% of patients discontinued), plateau disease (21.3%), receiving a second transplant (17.0%), toxicity (10.6%), or switched to another regimen (8.5%). A partial response (>50% protein reduction) was obtained in 37.3% of patients, 18.6% attained minimal response (25–50% protein reduction), 33.8% patients stable disease, while 10.2% patients had progressed on treatment. The estimated median (95% CI) months of progression-free survival after start of C/P treatment is 14.9 (8.7, 21.7). Twenty-three (38.9%) of patients have relapsed after C/P treatment, a median (range) of 8.7 (0.5–65.7) months after start of C/P treatment. At 6 months 74.3% (95% C.I. 61.9% – 89.1%) of patients were progression-free with 28% (95% CI: 16.1–49.2%) progression free at two years. At time of analysis, 44 (74.6%) patients are still alive, with a median follow up of 10.6 months (range, 1.2 to 65.7) since the start of C/P therapy. Fifteen patients have died at a median 13.0 months (range, 1.4 to 61.7) since the time of C/P initiation. The median overall survival (95% C.I.) is estimated to be 35.9 months (24.2, NA). These results demonstrate that the combination of oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an effective (56% MR or PR), very well tolerated (10% discontinued due to toxicity) and convenient treatment as salvage MM therapy post-ASCT. The relative lack of myelosuppression allows for re-collection of stem cells and salvage transplant while retaining other active second line agents for later relapse. This regimen thus compares favorably with recent salvage therapeutics introduced in MM and is now being studied in combination with these newer active agents and in induction therapy.

Very Good Partial Response and Complete Response Predict Superior Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival After Single Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Multiple Myeloma,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4111-4111
Author(s):  
Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Andrew Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4111 In multiple myeloma (MM), the impact of complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR) achievement has been shown mostly after introduction of high dose therapy (HDT) supported by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Recently, the IFM group reported the impact of achievement of CR and VGPR in double ASCT. The purpose of this study is to confirm the prognostic value of CR/VGPR in a large group of patients treated with single ASCT. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent single ASCT at Princess Margaret Hospital between January 2000 and December 2007 were evaluated. Patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF and majority were conditioned with melphalan 200mg/m2. Response to therapy was assessed according to the IMWC including VGPR. Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were measured from transplant date to the date of death or last follow-up. OS and DFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess CR and VGPR and some other prognostic markers at presentation such as age, B2Mg> 460 μmol/L, LDH> 350 IU/L, CRP> 20mg/L, albumin<35g/L and creatinine > 200 μmol/L. All p-values were 2-sided and statistically significant if <0.05. Results 788 patients were identified for the study; their median age was 56 years (30–73). Patient's characteristics are listed in Table 1. Response was assessed at day 100 after ASCT and showed a CR of 6%, PR of 37.5%, and VGPR of 53% (Overall Response rate of 95.5%). Median OS and PFS for the group were 77.43 months and 20.63 months respectively. The median OS and PFS were significantly better for patients who achieved CR/VGPR, 104.5 months versus 51.7 months, and 26.3 months versus 13.53 months respectively. With a median follow-up of 44 months there is no significant difference in OS for those patients who achieved VGPR/CR after induction therapy with novel agents. However, PFS is better in those patients receiving novel agents who achieved VGPR/CR (Median PFS of 24.63months versus 12.4 months respectively (p=0.01). Multivariate analysis shows CR/VGPR as an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (Fig 1 and 2). B2Mg> 460 μmol/L, LDH> 350 IU/L, CRP > 20mg/L, albumin<35g/L and creatinine > 200 μmol/L failed to be important factor for survival in the multivariate analysis. Our data suggests that VGPR/CR is clearly important in the pre-novel agents era and for the smaller group of patients who had novel agents induction there is a benefit in PFS and with a longer follow-up perhaps in OS. In conclusion, VGPR/CR remains a simple and powerful indicator in the context of single ASCT and should be considered a relevant objective for MM treatment. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with Multiple Myeloma undergoing single ASCT Clinical characteristic N=788 Median Range % Age (years) 58 31–74 Male 59.4% Female 40.6% Hemoglobin (g/L) 114 54–180 Creatinine (μmol/L) 107 28–1409 B2-microglobulin ((μmol/L) (N=718) 508 260–7270 Albumin (g/L) (N=650) 38 23–54 IgG 51.1% IgA 31.3% IgM 0.4% IgD 0.7% Biclonal 9.9% Not Detected 6.6 Kappa 59.4% Lambda 32.9% Biclonal 2% Not Detected 5.7% Calcium (μmol/L) 2.29 1.62–4.66 LDH (IU/L) (N=754) 235 50–1470 Induction Treatment: 52.2% VAD 22.8% Dexamethasone 6.3% TD 2.3% CP 3.8% DPACE/DTPACE 1.7% DVD 8% CyBORD 2% VD Ab: VAD: Vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone, TD: Thalidomide and Dexamethasone; CP: Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone, DVD: Doxil, Velcade and Dexamethasone, CyBORD: Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone and VD: Valcade and Dexamethasone Disclosures: Jimenez-Zepeda: J & J: Honoraria. Reece:Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Salvage Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplant with Consolidation for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5497-5497
Author(s):  
Kamal Kant Singh Abbi ◽  
Sonya Behrends ◽  
Margarida Silverman ◽  
Umar Farooq ◽  
Kalyan Nadiminti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Therapeutic options for patients with Multiple myeloma (MM) whose disease has relapsed after a prior autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) include an expanding armamentarium of novel agents, often combined with traditional chemotherapy, or a second SCT, with no clear standard of care. Upfront tandem transplantation has been shown to improve both progression free survival and overall survival. But currently, there is little data regarding the application of tandem SCT in relapsed multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent salvage melphalan-based tandem SCT for relapsed MM at University of Iowa Hospitals and clinics. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of the first salvage SCT to disease progression or death, whereas overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of the first salvage SCT to the date of death from any cause. Results: Between 2012 and 2015, 12 patients with MM received tandem autograft (total 24 transplants) for relapsed disease at our center. Conditioning was with VDT-melphalan 200mg/m2 (21/24), VDT-MEL 140mg/m2 (2/24) and Velcade, gemcitabine, BCNU, melphalan and dexamethasone (1/24). The median age at the salvage SCT was 48 years (range 37-58); 7 patients were female. 17% had high risk cytogenetics (including t(4;14), +1q, p53 loss) at the time of salvage SCT. Median time between previous transplant and progression of disease was 34 months (range 8-108). Of the 7 patients, who received re-induction therapy, 71% had chemotherapy refractory disease prior to salvage SCT. Response was assessed at 2-3 months post-SCT. Overall response rate was 92%. 7/12 (58%) patients achieved stringent complete remission, one patient achieved CR, one patient achieved near CR, 2/12 patients achieved VGPR and 1/12 had stable disease (SD). Following salvage tandem SCT, all patients received consolidation therapy with three drug combination, intended to be given for two years. Three patients have shown progressive disease at the time of analysis. The median PFS was 390 days (range 265- 1085) (Table-1); the median OS was 517 days (range 338-1085) (Table-2). Rate of progression free survival in the 10 evaluable patients at one year was 80%. There was no transplant related mortality. One patient died of progressive disease. Conclusions: Salvage tandem SCT is an effective strategy for relapsed MM and is especially effective in patients who had received less intensive therapy initially (single transplant and no maintenance therapy). Incorporation of novel agents (monoclonal antibodies and high doses of carfilzomib) into maintenance strategies may further improve outcomes. Figure 1. Progression free survival for all the patients Figure 1. Progression free survival for all the patients Figure 2. Overall survival for all the patients Figure 2. Overall survival for all the patients Disclosures Farooq: Kite Pharma: Research Funding.

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prognostic significance of t(11;14) expression by FISH in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19525-e19525
Author(s):  
Miguel Gonzalez Velez ◽  
Ricardo Daniel Parrondo ◽  
Tracy Andrews ◽  
Narjust Duma ◽  
Joshua Ryan Richter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Seer Data ◽  
Worse Prognosis

e19525 Background: Rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) on chromosome 14 are identified by FISH in about 15-20% of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Historically there is variation on the significance on prognosis of these rearrangements: typically, t(4;14), t(14;16) and t(14;20) have high risk (HR), and t(11;14) have standard risk (SR). A recent study (Kaufman et al, Leukemia. 2016 30:633-9) suggests that t(11;14) may confer a worse prognosis We report the prognostic significance of t(11;14) in a single-institution MM cohort. Methods: 87 pts with t(11;14) by CD 138 selected FISH at diagnosis were identified, pts without symptomatic MM were excluded. Cox regression was used for statistical analysis. Progression free survival (PFS), and overall survivals (OS) from diagnosis and post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 62 years, 45 pts (52%) were male, and 24 pts (27%) had ISS 3. All pts received either a proteasome inhibitor or an immunomodulatory agent, and 42 (48%) received triplet treatment as induction. Sixty-nine (79%) pts had ASCT, and overall response rate (ORR, partial response or better) post ASCT was 73%. For pts with HR FISH (defined as t(14;16), p53 del, 1q21 gain or 1p del) compared to SR FISH, the ORR post ASCT was 70% vs 77% (p = 0.67). OS from diagnosis was 93% at 3 years, 74% at 4 years and 51% at 5 years. Seven patients (8%) developed plasma cell leukemia, and there was no association between HR and SR FISH (p = 0.66). In multivariate analysis, ISS stage was an independent risk factor for mortality; pts with stage 3 had 7.3 times (CI: 1.16-36.4) and 5.7 times (CI: 1.63-20.0) the risk of mortality than pts with stage 1 and 2. Having an ASCT reduced mortality by 87% (CI: 0.04-0.41). Conclusions: Despite the use of novel therapies the OS at 5 years of our pts with MM was not significantly improved compared to SEER data from 1992-2013 (51% vs 48.5%). Pts with t(11;14) who had ASCT had increased survival compared to those who did not. Our results suggest that t(11;14) may confer a worse prognosis. Further prospective studies evaluating the risk of t(11;14) are warranted.

Autologous stem cell transplantation versus no transplant in patients above 70 with multiple myeloma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20509-e20509
Author(s):  
Christopher Lemieux ◽  
Lori S. Muffly ◽  
David Joseph Iberri ◽  
Andrew Rezvani ◽  
Robert Lowsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Included Patient

e20509 Background: We evaluated outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) ≥ 70 years who were seen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) consult, based on whether they underwent transplant vs. non-transplant treatment. Methods: 138 patients with MM ≥ 70 years (median 71, range 70-78) were evaluated in the BMT clinic from 1/2010 to 11/2019 for a transplant consult. Results: Of the 138 patients, 53 proceeded to ASCT. ASCT was not pursued in 85 patients despite most (79%) being eligible for transplant. Reasons for deferring ASCT in eligible patients included patient preference (48%, n = 32) and physician preference (52%, n = 35). 68 patients were seen during first-line therapy, of which 29 underwent upfront transplant. The remainder were seen at second-line or beyond. There was no difference in baseline characteristics among the 113 patients with available follow-up (ASCT = 53, non-ASCT = 60), including median age (71 vs. 72 years, p = 0.4), high-risk cytogenetics (41% vs. 31%, p = 0.4), high-risk HCT-CI (32% vs. 20% p = 0.2), and ISS stage III (34% vs. 27%, p = 0.6). In the 53 patients who underwent transplant, conditioning melphalan dose was 200 mg/m2 (75%, n = 40) and 140 mg/m2 (25%, n = 13). Day 100 transplant related mortality was 0% (n = 0). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in patients who were seen for consultation within 1 year of diagnosis (n = 80). With a median follow-up of 27 months, median PFS amongst patients ≥ 70 years undergoing ASCT (n = 39) was 47 months compared to 34 months in the non-ASCT (n = 41) group, p = 0.006. Median OS was not reached in either group. Estimated 5-years OS was 76% in the ASCT group and 82% in the non-ASCT group (p = 0.6). There was no difference in PFS of patients ≥ 70 undergoing ASCT compared to a cotemporaneous cohort of patients < 70 (n = 639) from our institution (47 vs. 57 months, p = 0.3). Conclusions: Selected patients ≥ 70 years with MM undergoing ASCT have better PFS compared to patients with similar characteristics who do not undergo ASCT. ASCT is safe in this older population and outcomes were similar compared to younger patients. [Table: see text]

Single Centre Analysis Of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Outcomes In Multiple Myeloma In 338 Consecutive Patients: Maintenance/Consolidation Is Associated With Superior Survival, But Early Relapse Is The Single Most Important Predictor Of Survival and May Override Genetic Risk

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2159-2159
Author(s):  
Paul M Maciocia ◽  
Nicholas Counsell ◽  
Antonia Bird ◽  
Laura Percy ◽  
Sally Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Important Predictor ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Early Relapse

Abstract Introduction High dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) represents the standard of care for untreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are young and fit. Novel agents are changing the landscape of pre- and post-ASCT therapies, but benefits may not apply to all patients. We report 338 MM patients treated with up-front ASCT at University College Hospital London from September 1993 - December 2010. Results Patient characteristics are described in Table 1. 90 (27%) received novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide) prior to transplant, and the remainder had VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone)-based regimens. Most patients (64%) had 1 line of therapy prior to ASCT, 26% had 2 lines and 11% >/=3 lines. Responses to first line therapy were 24% >/= VGPR, 45% PR, ORR 69%. Best response prior to ASCT was: 27% >/= VGPR, 59% PR, ORR of 86%. 42 patients (12%) had stable disease or worse pre-ASCT. Transplant-related mortality at 100 days was 3.3%, 166 patients (49%) attained >/= VGPR at 3 months and 126 (37%) PR. Maintenance/consolidation regimens were interferon or thalidomide-based. Median follow-up was 6.1 yrs, progression-free survival (PFS) 2.0 yrs and overall survival was (OS) 5.8 yrs from ASCT and 6.8 yrs from diagnosis. 266 patients have relapsed, and 169 have died. On multivariate analysis, international staging system (ISS) stage 1, female gender, use of novel agents first-line and disease response (>/=VGPR pre- and 3 months post-ASCT) predicted longer PFS (p's < 0.05). Timing of relapse was the most important predictor of survival (median OS 1.6yrs if relapse within 12 months vs 7.2yrs if not, HR = 6.7, p<0.001. Shorter OS was also associated with male gender, advanced ISS, non-IgG isotype, CD56-negativity, older age at ASCT, <PR post ASCT (p's < 0.05) and later year of ASCT (median OS 6.2 yrs 2005-10 v 4.9 yrs 1993-2004, HR = 0.8, p = 0.006). Use of novel agents at first line predicted longer OS on univariate but not multivariate analysis. Prior lines of therapy and time from diagnosis to ASCT did not impact PFS or OS. Post-ASCT maintenance/ consolidation therapy was associated with prolonged PFS (adj HR 0.6, [95% CI 0.4-0.8] and OS (adj HR 0.5 [0.3-0.7]. Adverse cytogenetics (CGN) was associated with reduced PFS (HR 1.7 [1.1 – 2.7]) and OS (HR 2.2 [1.2-4.0]). In patients with adverse CGN who did not relapse early, OS was similar to patients with standard risk CGN (OS 5.6 yrs v 7.2 yrs, p = NS, Fig 1). Outcomes for those relapsing early were similar in pre-2005 and later (>/= 2005) cohorts (OS 1.6 v 1.7 yrs, p = NS, Fig 2). Median post-relapse survival (PRS) was 2.6 yrs. Factors predicting longer PRS included IgG isotype, CD56-positivity, later year of ASCT and of relapse, younger age at ASCT, longer PFS from ASCT and the use of novel agents at relapse. Patients relapsing in 2005 and later had longer PRS (3.6 v 1.3 yrs, HR = 0.4, p = 0.0001). Prior treatment with maintenance/consolidation did not impact PRS (PRS 3.1 v 2.4 yrs, p = NS). Conclusions These data indicate that post-ASCT strategies and choice of agent at relapse may be as important determinants of outcome as disease response pre-ASCT. Early relapse was the most important predictor of death following ASCT and may outweigh the impact of adverse CGN. The adverse outcome of patients relapsing early is not salvaged using contemporary treatment strategies at relapse. The benefit of CD56 expression on OS, but not on PFS suggests this denotes disease that remains chemo-responsive disease through relapses. Maintenance or consolidation therapy following ASCT appears to prolong PFS and OS without impacting post-relapse survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Update on the Initial Therapy of Multiple Myeloma

2013 ◽  
pp. e307-e312
Author(s):  
Donna Reece
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Bortezomib Treatment

Advances in myeloma biology and the identification of new anti-myeloma agents have resulted in improved management of younger, transplant-eligible, and older patients. The first novel agents—thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide—have been integrated into induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as well as into first-line therapy in elderly individuals; phase III trials have established the superiority of these approaches in terms of better response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and, in some studies, overall survival. With more experience, improvements in dosing have decreased the toxicity of these regimens. Before ASCT, four phase III studies have shown that bortezomib-based regimens confer better outcomes than older regimens. Posttransplant consolidation and maintenance strategies with novel agents provide additional benefit, particularly in terms of a longer PFS. In the elderly population, novel agents can be combined with melphalan plus prednisone (MP). MP plus thalidomide and MP plus bortezomib are commonly utilized, and the regimen of MP plus lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance (MPR + R) produces superior response rates and longer PFS compared with MP alone. Prolonged maintenance with bortezomib plus thalidomide also appears to extend PFS when given following combinations of MP plus bortezomib. Treatment of very elderly patients, however, remains challenging due to comorbidities and side effects. Lenalidomide plus weekly dexamethasone is also effective in elderly patients, and results of a trial comparing this regimen with MP plus thalidomide should be available soon. Finally, better methods of risk stratification and the availability of even newer drugs will allow future refinements in myeloma treatment.

scholarly journals Effect of prior treatments on selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria V. Mateos ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Boston Study ◽  
Previously Treated

AbstractTherapeutic regimens for previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) may not provide prolonged disease control and are often complicated by significant adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy. In patients with previously treated MM in the Phase 3 BOSTON study, once weekly selinexor, once weekly bortezomib, and 40 mg dexamethasone (XVd) demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS), higher response rates, deeper responses, a trend to improved survival, and reduced incidence and severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy when compared with standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg dexamethasone (Vd). The pre-specified analyses described here evaluated the influence of the number of prior lines of therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide, prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy, prior immunomodulatory drug therapy, and prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on the efficacy and safety of XVd compared with Vd. In this 1:1 randomized study, enrolled patients were assigned to receive once weekly oral selinexor (100 mg) with once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and 40 mg per week dexamethasone (XVd) versus standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg per week dexamethasone (Vd). XVd significantly improved PFS, overall response rate, time-to-next-treatment, and showed reduced all grade and grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy compared with Vd regardless of prior treatments, but the benefits of XVd over Vd were more pronounced in patients treated earlier in their disease course who had either received only one prior therapy, had never been treated with a PI, or had prior ASCT. Treatment with XVd improved outcomes as compared to Vd regardless of prior therapies as well as manageable and generally reversible adverse events. XVd was associated with clinical benefit and reduced peripheral neuropathy compared to standard Vd in previously treated MM. These results suggest that the once weekly XVd regimen may be optimally administered to patients earlier in their course of disease, as their first bortezomib-containing regimen, and in those relapsing after ASCT.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03110562). Registered 12 April 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03110562.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document