Relapse in Childhood “Very High Risk” Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with BFM Chemotherapy Has a Dismal Outcome Even When Treated with Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 915-915
Author(s):  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Maria Grazia Valsecchi ◽  
André Schrauder ◽  
Daniela Silvestri ◽  
Barbara Buldini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Survival After Relapse ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Induction Failure ◽  
Very High ◽  
New Strategies ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract The definition “very-high risk” (VHR) in the setting of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is usually adopted to identify children eligible for transplantation in first complete remission (CR1). The endpoint of this study is to assess whether, how many, and how VHR ALL children achieving CR1 and not transplanted in CR1 can be rescued in case of relapse. Eligiblity criteria to transplantation in AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study slightly changed overtime and differed between the BFM (Berlin Frankfurt Muenster) and AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica) Groups.. For this analysis VHR ALL was defined by one or more of the following criteria: induction failure (IF), high levels (≥ 1x10−3) of minimal residual disease at day 78 (VHR-MRD), clonal abnormality t(4;11), prednisone poor response associated (PPR+) with one or more of the followings: hyperleukocytosis, T-immunophenotype, ≥ 25% marrow blasts at day 15, pro-B immunophenotype. Patients carrying clonal abnormality t(9;22) were not included here since allocated in a specific study protocol since 2004. Out of 571 VHR patients, distributed among the four criteria (17%, 45%, 3%, 35%, as hierarchically listed), 249 (43%) were transplanted in CR1 (80%, 48%, 47%, 25% in each category) and 322 (57%) were not. Of the 322 patients treated with chemotherapy [5-year-EFS 53.5% (SE 3.1), 5-year-survival 66.6% (SE 2.9)], 19 died in CR1, 6 presented with a second malignancy, and 113 (35%) relapsed at a median of 15 months after diagnosis, mostly in the bone marrow (81%: 66% isolated, 15% combined) or in an extramedullary site (19%, 15% in the central nervous system) at a median time of 9 ms after diagnosis. The 3-year-survival after relapse was only 26.0% (SE 5.1) for the 113 patients overall, 38.7% (SE 7.8) for the 55 who underwent transplantation in CR2 and 16.2% (SE 5.3) for the 58 who were not transplanted in CR2. Interestingly the 3-year-survival after relapse by VHR criteria was only 7.1% (SE 9.3) in the IF, 28.6% (SE 7.1) in the VHR-MRD and 33.1% (SE 6.7) in the PPR+ subgroups. In conclusion very few VHR-ALL children could be rescued after relapse, particularly among those carrying most unfavourable criteria at the onset (IF and VHR MRD), confirming that transplantation should be performed in CR1. Transplantation in CR2 was feasible in only half of the patients and presumably their outcome was influenced by MRD response after relapse; this aspect is under investigation. New strategies are needed for this dismal subset of patients.

Minimal residual disease at end of induction and consolidation remain important prognostic indicators for newly diagnosed children and young adults with very high-risk (VHR) B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL): Children’s Oncology Group AALL1131.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10004-10004
Author(s):  
Wanda L. Salzer ◽  
Michael James Burke ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Yunfeng Dai ◽  
Nyla A. Heerema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Post Induction ◽  
Children And Young Adults ◽  
Very High ◽  
Minimal Residual

10004 Background: Children and young adults with very high risk (VHR) B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) [13-30 years of age with any features or 1-30 years of age with adverse prognostic features including KMT2A rearrangements, iAMP21, hypodiploidy (<44 chromosomes/DNA index < 0.81), central nervous system disease, end of induction (EOI) minimal residual disease (MRD) >0.01%, or induction failure] collectively have a predicted 4-year disease free survival (DFS) of approximately 70%. Whether patients with VHR B-ALL who are MRD positive at EOI and become MRD negative at the end of consolidation (EOC) will have improved survival versus patients remaining MRD positive at EOC is unknown. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed NCI high risk B-ALL enrolled on AALL1131 or NCI standard risk B-ALL enrolled on AALL0932 and classified as VHR at EOI were treated on the VHR stratum of AALL1131 which sought to improve DFS with intensive post-Induction therapy using fractionated cyclophosphamide (CPM), etoposide (ETOP) and clofarabine (CLOF).Patients were randomly assigned post-Induction to Control Arm (CA) with modified augmented BFM CPM + fractionated cytarabine + mercaptopurine, Experimental Arm 1 (Exp1) with CPM + ETOP, or Experimental Arm 2 (Exp2) with CLOF + CPM + ETOP during Part 2 of Consolidation and Delayed Intensification. Doses of vincristine and pegaspargase were identical on all arms. Exp2 was permanently closed September 2014 due to excessive toxicities, and these patients are excluded from this report. MRD was measured by 6-color flow cytometry at EOI and for those who consented at the EOC. Results: 4-yr DFS for all patients (n=823) with VHR B-ALL was 76.8 ± 2.0%. As we reported previously, 4-year DFS was not significantly different between CA and Exp 1 (85.5 ± 6.8% versus 72.3 ± 6.3%; p=0.76; Burke, Haematologica 2019). 4-yr DFS for patients who were EOI MRD <0.01%, (n=325) versus >0.01 (n=498) was 83.3% ± 2.6% vs 72.0% ± 2.8%, p=0.0013. 4-Year DFS of Patients EOI MRD > 0.01%. Conclusions: MRD is a powerful prognostic indicator in VHR B-ALL with inferior outcomes in patients who are EOI MRD positive. Among patients who were EOI MRD positive treated on Exp1, outcomes were similar for EOC MRD negative and EOC MRD positive, though numbers were small. In contrast, patients who were EOI MRD positive treated on CA that were EOC MRD negative had significantly improved DFS compared to those that were EOC MRD positive. The CA remains the standard of care for COG ALL trials. With this therapy, patients with VHR B-ALL that are EOI MRD positive and EOC MRD negative have significantly improved DFS compared to those that remain MRD positive at EOC. Clinical trial information: NCT02883049. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Personalized therapy in pediatric high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072092757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth E. Karol ◽  
Ching-Hon Pui
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Stratification ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Minimal Residual

Although cure rates for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have now risen to more than 90%, subsets of patients with high-risk features continue to experience high rates of treatment failure and relapse. Recent work in minimal residual disease stratification and leukemia genomics have increased the ability to identify and classify these high-risk patients. In this review, we discuss this work to identify and classify patients with high-risk ALL. Novel therapeutics, which may have the potential to improve outcomes for these patients, are also discussed.

Single Immunophenotypical Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease before Autotransplantation of Non-Cryopreserved Bone Marrow Is Insufficient for Prediction of Outcome in High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439
Author(s):  
Beata M. Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
Krystyna Jagoda ◽  
Aleksandra M. Holowiecka-Goral ◽  
Tomasz Czerw ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract For high-risk adult ALL patients alloHCT is a preferable option. However, a significant proportion of those not having a suitable donor may be successfully treated with autotransplantation (autoHCT). Based on our experience this treatment ensures low transplant related mortality below 3% and a reasonable overall survival and disease free survival of 60% and 45% respectively. The status of the disease before transplantation is an important factor for long term results. In childhood ALL most studies suggest that the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction evaluated immunophenotypically or with bio-molecular methods is predictive for outcome after different treatments including chemotherapy, alloHCT and autoHCT. The results in adult ALL are more controversial. Patients selection. Among 1205 haematopoetic cell transplantations performed in our institution 224 (147 autologous, 77 allogeneic) were performed in 205 adults with ALL. For this study we selected an uniform group of 81 patients fulfilling following criteria’s: Ph (-) ALL, status CR1, evaluable MRD, strictly defined autoBMT procedure performed until the end of 2003. Methods. MRD was tested before autoBMT (median interval 10 days) using 2 ore 3-color flow-cytometry, as appropriate. The atypical immunophenotypes were evaluated using the “quadrans” analysis in all cases and since 2002 also the “empty spaces” technique. The sensitivity equals at least 0.0001. For all autoHSCT bone marrow was used as a source of stem cells. The CAV conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg on d. -3, -2, cytarabine 2 g/m2 d. -3, -2, -1, etoposide 800 mg/m2 d. -3, -2. Bone marrow was not cryo-preserved after collection but stored in 40 C and re-transplanted after 72h. Results. In 41 patients; age med. 26 y (15–53), F/M=12/29, the MRD level was &lt;0,001: the MRD (−) group. In 40 patients; age med. 29 y (16–53), F/M=18/22, the MRD was detected at the level =/&gt; 0,001; MRD+ group. The ALL-immunophenotypes of MRD−/MRD+ groups were as follows; proB 4/7, preB 2/6, Common 18/19, B 0/1, preT 5/2, T 12/1). The interval from DGN to BMT was similar in both groups. The probability of LFS and OS at 10y calculated with median follow up time of 5y equaled; in the MRD(−) group 47% and 62% and in the MRD+ one 48% and 57% respectively (p=ns). The main reason of failure in both groups was a relapse which occurred after a median time of 277 days in the MRD(−) group and 134 days in MRD+ one (p=0.19). Conclusion and comment. Based on this observation we conclude that a single evaluation stratifying patients before autoBMT according to MRD level below or above 0.001 is not predictive for DFS and OS, because it informs only about the current amount of the disease but not about its opportunistic nature. In this respect a repeatedly confirmed MRD positivity should be more significant. Taking into consideration that the main reason of failures were relapses, this finding suggests also that in patients with chemotherapy-responsive ALL confirmed by stabile CR, the myeloablative CAV regimen is sufficiently strong to eliminate the residual disease at the level ranging 0.01–0.001. It may be speculated only that the 72h lasting incubation of bone marrow product before re-transplantation has also some kind of purging effect for leukemic blasts.

Status of Minimal Residual Disease Determines Outcome of Autologous HSCT in Adults with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2321-2321
Author(s):  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Beata Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Dieter Hoelzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 2321 Poster Board II-298 The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a subject of controversies as several prospective studies failed to prove its advantage over maintenance chemotherapy. Those studies, however, did not take into account the status of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is now recognized a potent predictor for relapse among patients treated with conventional-dose chemotherapy. The goal of this analysis was to determine the impact of MRD on outcome of autoHSCT. Data on 123 autoHSCT recipients collected from 6 study groups cooperating in the European Leukemia Net were analyzed. Median age of 77 B-lineage and 46 T-lineage high-risk ALL patients was 31 (16-59) years. Ph+ ALL was recognized in 20 cases. All patients were in first complete remission (CR) lasting 6 (1.5-22) months. Peripheral blood was used as a source of stem cells in 67 patients whereas bone marrow, in 56 cases. Conditioning was based on chemotherapy alone (n=76) or total body irradiation (n=47). MRD was evaluated in bone marrow with the use of either multiparametric flow cytometry (n=79) or molecular techniques (n=44). MRD level of 0.1% bone marrow cells was used as a cut-off point for the purpose of this study. At the time of autoHSCT MRD was &0.1% in 93 patients and ≧0.1% in 30 cases. With the median follow up of 5 years, the probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years for the whole group equaled 48% (+/-5). Three patients died of transplantation-related complications. The LFS rate was significantly higher for patients with the MRD level at transplantation &0.1% compared to those with MRD ≧0.1% (57% vs. 19%, p=0.0002). The difference was particularly pronounced for peripheral blood HSCT (66% vs. 20%, p=0.0006) and for T-lineage ALL (62% vs. 8%, p=0.001). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for other potential prognostic factors (age, CR duration, Ph+ ALL, immunophenotype, source of stem cells, type of conditioning), the MRD status &0.1% remained the only independent factor associated with increased LFS (HR=2.5, p=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: MRD status is the most important predictor for LFS after autoHSCT in adults with ALL. More than half of patients with high risk disease and low MRD level at the time of transplantation may be cured. This observation may contribute to re-evaluation of the role of autoHSCT in the therapy of adult ALL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Minimal Residual Disease At 3 Months, Combined to the Presence of IKZF1 Deletion in B-Lineage or Absence of NOTCH1 pathway Mutation in T-Lineage, Recapitulates the Disease Risk Assessment in Adults with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - A GRAALL Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 572-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kheira Beldjord ◽  
Elizabeth Macintyre ◽  
Véronique Lhéritier ◽  
Marie-Laure Boulland ◽  
Thibaut Leguay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 572 Aim. In recent series of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the GRAALL (ASH 2009, abstract 577) and other cooperative groups have confirmed the strong prognostic value of Ig/TCR minimal residual disease (MRD) on patient outcome. Despite this, age, WBC, CNS involvement, recurrent chromosomal translocations, and early response to steroids and chemotherapy remain frequently used to tailor post-remission therapy and envision allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in most adult ALL trials. We updated our MRD study, now with 262 patients who all achieved complete remission (CR) after the first induction and were assessed for MRD after induction (MRD1, at 6 weeks) and consolidation (MRD2, at 12 weeks). One hundred and fifty-eight patients had Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL), while 104 had T-cell ALL (T-ALL). Since 107 of the BCP-ALL (68%) were studied for IKZF1 deletion and 90 of the T-ALL patients (87%) for NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutations, we were able to reassess the MRD significance according to these newly described oncogenic markers. These two covariates (i.e. MRD and IKZF1/NOTCH1/FBXW7 genetics) allowed us to redefine a much simpler yet more powerful stratification of disease risk in both BCP- ALL and T-ALL subsets. Methods. All 262 patients studied (median age, 31.5 years) were treated in the GRAALL-2003 and GRAALL-2005 trials. Although they were younger and had more frequently circulating blasts, other characteristics and outcome did not differ from patients treated in the same trials but not assessed for MRD. Ig/TCR MRD levels were determined according to Euro-MRD guidelines (Leukemia 2007;21:604). IKZF1 deletions were assessed by multiplex multi-fluorescent PCR. NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutations were assessed as previously described (Blood 2009;113:3918). Multivariate backward stepwise selection Cox models were used for the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints, after censoring transplanted patients at SCT. Models were always adjusted on age (35-year cutoff), WBC (30 and 100 G/L cutoff for BCP- and T-ALL, respectively), CNS involvement, and trial. Additional BCP-specific covariates included CD20 expression, t(4;11) and t(1;19) translocations, and IKZF1 deletion. Additional T-specific covariates included cortical immunophenotype according to the EGIL classification, TLX1 overexpression, and NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation. Finally, allogeneic SCT was re-evaluated in the newly defined risk subsets, as a time-dependent covariate. Results. An initial multivariate analysis revealed that among blood response after 1 week of steroid, bone marrow response after 2 weeks of therapy, and molecular response at both MRD1 and MRD2 time-points, the MRD2 level was the main and sole independent predictor of relapse (P=0.003). In BCP-ALL patients, persistent MRD2 and IKZF1 deletion were the only two independent factors identified, the presence of at least one factor defining 51% high-risk patients with 52% versus 15% CIR (HR, 3.8; P= 0.008), 41% versus 81% DFS (HR, 3.6; P= 0.005), and 54% versus 80% OS (HR, 3.9; P= 0.015) at 4 years. Allogeneic SCT in first CR significantly decreased relapse incidence and prolonged DFS in these new high-risk BCP-ALL patients (HR, 0.23 and 0.40; P= 0.016 and 0.05, respectively). In T-ALL patients, persistent MRD2 and lack of NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation were the only two independent factors identified, the presence of at least one factor defining 49% high-risk patients with 64% versus 12% CIR (HR, 6.4; P= 0.002), 36% versus 88% DFS (HR, 6.4; P= 0.002), and 41% versus 95% OS (HR, 7.3; P= 0.015) at 4 years. SCT had no significant effect on relapse incidence and DFS in these new high-risk T-ALL patients. Conclusion. In adult patients with Ph-negative ALL treated with the pediatric-inspired GRAALL regimen, IKZF1 deletion in BCP-ALL, NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation in T-ALL, and MRD at 3 months in both subsets replace all classical risk factors, leading to a new simplified prognostic scoring system based only on IKZF1 and NOTCH1/FBXW7 genetics and MRD clearance. This new risk score identifies approximately half of the patients as good-risk, with a relapse incidence as low as 10–15%. It will be validated and used prospectively in the next generation of GRAALL trials, to stratify both new drug evaluation and SCT in first CR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Disease Response Guiding Therapy in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: Pivotal Role of Minimal Residual Disease

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. SCI-34-SCI-34
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pulsipher
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

In spite of an explosion of data regarding mutations associated with childhood ALL, to date these key genetic changes rarely have been the driver of therapy. Clinical parameters at presentation (WBC, age, T- vs. B-lineage, etc.) have dictated initial risk stratification and induction approaches, followed by risk-adapted therapy based upon leukemic response measured by minimal residual disease (MRD, either PCR- or flow cytometry-based). With minor variations, rapid disappearance of peripheral MRD, followed by significant clearance from the marrow after induction, and most importantly, the level of MRD after consolidation have allowed clear distinctions in outcomes that have driven intensification or de-intensification of therapy resulting in improved outcomes. Although specific gene mutations have been associated with risk, MRD has further identified better risk patients within genetic subgroups. For patients noted to be very high risk who are candidates for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the presence of MRD both pre- and post-transplant has been associated with increased risk of relapse; the risk being modified by level of MRD, whether or not GVHD occurs after HCT, and timing after HCT when MRD is measured. In lower risk patients being treated with chemotherapy and higher risk patients eligible for HCT, more sensitive approaches to flow cytometry and PCR, as well as next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD approaches (sensitive to 1/10^7 cells) are currently being tested. It is not clear yet whether NGS-MRD offers substantial improvements in patients treated with chemotherapy, as broad-based testing is underway; the latest comparative outcomes will be presented. There is evidence of a striking improvement in our ability to define patients who will do very will after transplant (not relapse), and preliminary evidence that post-HCT NGS MRD testing is more sensitive that other methodologies in defining risk of relapse after transplant. As the latest information about the ability of different approaches to MRD is shown in this session, we will also present how response to therapy based upon MRD interacts with various genetic subtypes (Ph+ ALL, extreme hypodiploidy, etc.). Even in subclasses that are considered very high risk based solely upon genetics, measurement of MRD can define higher and lower risk groups. Going forward, as more and different types of patients are subcategorized and treated with targeted agents based upon specific mutations, it is likely MRD response will continue to be important in mapping intensity of approach and defining children at highest risk of relapse who might benefit from HCT or other cellular therapeutic approaches. Disclosures Pulsipher: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Use of Minimal Residual Disease Assessment to Redefine Induction Failure in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
David O’Connor ◽  
Anthony V. Moorman ◽  
Rachel Wade ◽  
Jeremy Hancock ◽  
Ronald M.R. Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Assessment ◽  
Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Real Time Quantitative Pcr ◽  
Induction Failure ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose Our aim was to determine the role of end-of-induction (EOI) minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in the identification and stratification of induction failure in patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and to identify genetic abnormalities that drive disease in these patients. Patients and Methods Analysis included 3,113 patients who were treated in the Medical Research Council UKALL2003 multicenter randomized trial (NCT00222612) between 2003 and 2011. MRD was measured by using standardized real-time quantitative PCR. Median follow-up was 5 years 9 months. Results Fifty-nine patients (1.9%) had morphologic induction failure with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 50.7% (95% CI, 37.4 to 64.0) and 5-year overall survival of 57.7% (95% CI, 44.2 to 71.2). Of these, a small proportion of patients with M2 marrow (6 of 44) and a low EOI MRD level (< 0.01%) had 5-year EFS of 100%. Conversely, among patients with morphologic remission 2.3% (61 of 2,633) had high MRD (≥ 5%) and 5-year EFS of 47.0% (95% CI, 32.9 to 61.1), which was similar to those with morphologic induction failure. Redefining induction failure to include morphologic induction failure and/or MRD ≥ 5% identified 3.9% (120 of 3,133 patients) of the trial cohort with 5-year EFS of 48.0% (95% CI, 39.3 to 58.6). Induction failure (morphologic or MRD ≥ 5%) occurred most frequently in T-ALL (10.1%; 39 of 386 T-ALL cases) and B-other ALL, that is, lacking established chromosomal abnormalities (5.6%; 43 of 772 B-other cases). Genetic testing within the B-other group revealed the presence of PDGFRB gene fusions, particularly EBF1-PDGFRB, in almost one third of B-other ALL cases. Conclusion Integration of EOI MRD level with morphology identifies induction failure more precisely than morphology alone. Prevalence of EBF1-PDGFRB fusions in this group highlights the importance of genetic screening to identify abnormalities that may be targets for novel agents.

scholarly journals High success rate of hematopoietic cell transplantation regardless of donor source in children with very high-risk leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing Leung ◽  
Dario Campana ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Deqing Pei ◽  
Elaine Coustan-Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Very High

Abstract We evaluated 190 children with very high-risk leukemia, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in 2 sequential treatment eras, to determine whether those treated with contemporary protocols had a high risk of relapse or toxic death, and whether non–HLA-identical transplantations yielded poor outcomes. For the recent cohorts, the 5-year overall survival rates were 65% for the 37 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 74% for the 46 with acute myeloid leukemia; these rates compared favorably with those of earlier cohorts (28%, n = 57; and 34%, n = 50, respectively). Improvement in the recent cohorts was observed regardless of donor type (sibling, 70% vs 24%; unrelated, 61% vs 37%; and haploidentical, 88% vs 19%), attributable to less infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.12; P = .005), regimen-related toxicity (HR = 0.25; P = .002), and leukemia-related death (HR = 0.40; P = .01). Survival probability was dependent on leukemia status (first remission vs more advanced disease; HR = 0.63; P = .03) or minimal residual disease (positive vs negative; HR = 2.10; P = .01) at the time of transplantation. We concluded that transplantation has improved over time and should be considered for all children with very high-risk leukemia, regardless of matched donor availability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document