Imatinib and Interferon-Alpha Maintenance Therapy for Patients with Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) Ineligible for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2042-2042
Author(s):  
Heike Pfeifer ◽  
Barbara Wassmann ◽  
Andreas Käbisch ◽  
Michael Lübbert ◽  
Lothar Leimer ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2042 Poster Board II-19 Introduction: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (IM), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, has become the mainstay of front-line treatment for Ph+ ALL. We recently demonstrated that IM in combination with intensive consolidation chemotherapy of approximately one year duration is feasible in elderly patients with de novo Ph+ ALL, but is associated with a high relapse rate. Allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) is potentially curative but may not be feasible in most elderly or comorbid patients. Maintenance therapy (MT) in such patients is conceptually attractive, but data on whether any type of MT facilitates long-term leukemia-free survival of patients with Ph+ALL in first CR is lacking. Based on data suggesting that interferon-alpha (IFN-a) possesses anti-leukemic activity in patients with Ph+ALL, we conducted a phase II study to determine the feasibility and efficacy of MT consisting of imatinib in combination with low-dose (LD) IFN-a in elderly patients with Ph+ALL who were not eligible for SCT. In addition, we examined whether bcr-abl transcript levels and mutation status were predictive of relapse and remission duration. Methods: Nineteen elderly patients (median age 66 yrs; [60-75 yrs.]) who had received IM-based remission induction and consolidation therapy as reported previously (Ottmann et al., Cancer 109:2068-76, 2007) were enrolled in a clinical trial of IM 400 mg daily in combination with LD-IFNa with a target dose of 3 Mio IU/week. At the time of enrollment, the majority of patients (n=12) had received five (n=3) or six (n=9) consolidation cycles, the remaining patients had discontinued intensive front-line therapy after four (n=2), three (n=1), two (n=1), and one (n=1) consolidation cycles, 2 patients were switched to MT after induction. The median number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy given concurrently with IM was six. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was serially assessed by quantitative RT-PCR, mutational analyses was performed by D-HPLC and direct sequencing. Results: The median overall duration of MT is 26 mos. (range 3-92 mos.). Seven of 19 pts. (37 %) are in ongoing CR, with a median remission duration from start of maintenance of 76.7 mos. (54-91 mos.). Median overall survival of all pts. is 61 mos. (range: 20-99 mos.). Eleven of 18 evaluable pts. experienced side effects which lead to a dose reduction of IFN. 9 pts. suffered from moderate depressions or fatigue. Hematologic toxicity was mild: only 2 pts. developed grade 3 cytopenia during MT. Remission duration was independent of the number of previous cycles of intensive chemotherapy, of the MRD response during the first 6 mos. of intensive front-line therapy (16 mos. vs. 26 mos.) and of achievement of PCR negativity at any time during intial therapy. Surprisingly, the bcr-abl transcript level at the start of MT likewise had no impact on time to disease recurrence. Conclusions: In elderly Ph+ALL pts. ineligible for allogeneic SCT, maintenance with imatinib in combination with low-dose IFN-a results in long-term sustained remissions in a substantial proportion of patients, with acceptable side effects. Surprisingly, the MRD response and mutation status prior to MT were not significantly predictive of remission duration. Likewise, greater intensity of prior chemotherapy as determined by the number of administered consolidation cycles had no significant benefit with respect to remission duration during MT. More extensive evaluation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with LD IFNa as MT for Ph+ALL is warrented. Disclosures: Ottmann: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1503-1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Pfeifer ◽  
Sylvia Wystub ◽  
A. Binckebanck ◽  
Barbara Wassmann ◽  
Andreas Käbisch ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1503 Background: The frequent development of acquired resistance in patients with Ph+ALL initially responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor(TKI)-based regimens highlights the need for more effective post-remission therapy. Imatinib or dasatinib as single agents or combined with chemotherapy are commonly employed, but do not adequately prevent relapse. Interferon-alpha as treatment for bcr-abl positive leukemias has attracted renewed interest, fueled by preclinical observations suggesting that IFN-a may target leukemic stem cells. Proposed mechansims of IFN-a action include recruitment of dormant CML stem cells into the cell cycle, enhancing their susceptibility to eradication by TKIs. Whereas several recent randomized clinical studies in CML demonstrate greater efficacy of combined IFN-a and TKI compared to TKIs alone, no long-term clinical data on the combination of IFN-a and TKIs are available for patients with Ph+ALL. Aims: This prospective, open-label phase II study was designed to investigate the combination of low-dose IFN-a with imatinib mesylate (IM) 600mg daily as maintenance therapy in Ph+ALL patients in terms of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity and the ability to adhere to the planned dose of the study drugs. In addition, we examined whether bcr-abl transcript levels and mutation status were predictive of relapse and remission duration. Outcome with study treatment is compared with that of patients with Ph+ALL who received the same initial therapy, followed by maintenance with imatinib alone. Patients and study design: Patients with Ph+ALL in first CR after receiving induction and consolidation chemotherapy according the GMALL protocol for elderly Ph+ALL who were not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). were eligible. MT consisted of IM at a single dose of 600 mg daily, combined with low dose subcutaneous interferon-alfa-2a (RoferonÒ) starting at 1 MU three times a week with dose escalation to a target dose of 3 MU three times a week as rapidly as tolerated. The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Frankfurt, Germany. Results: 19 elderly patients (median age 66 yrs; [60 – 75 yrs]) were enrolled in the combination study, 12 patients (median age 67 yrs; [58 – 75 yrs]) who received only IM as recommended MT after the same front-line therapy served as a control group. The median overall duration of MT is 26 mos. [3 – 110 mos]. Median overall survival for pts. receiving IM+ IFN-a is 5.4 yrs [2.5 – 11.4 yrs] vs. 2.9 yrs. [0.7 – 8.7 yrs] for pts. receiving IM alone (p=ns). For pts. receiving IM+ IFN-a, the median remission duration from start of maintenance is 2.2 yrs. [0.4–9.5 yrs] versus 0.75 yrs[0.1–7.6 yrs]. for patients receiving IM as MT (p=0.07). Three of 19 pts. are in ongoing CR 7.9, 8.6, and 10.4 years after start of maintenance. 4 pts. died in CR of causes unrelated to leukemia and 12 patients relapsed, 2 (16%) with isolated CNS involvement. Remission duration was independent of the number of previous cycles of intensive chemotherapy, of the MRD response during the first 6 mos. of intensive front-line therapy (16 mos. vs. 26 mos.) and of achievement of PCR negativity at any time during intial therapy. Surprisingly, the BCR-ABL transcript level at the start of MT likewise had no impact on time to disease recurrence. Prolonged MRD positivity without hematologic relapse occured in several patients. For pts. receiving IM as MT, 2 of 12 pts. are in ongoing CR 6.5 and 7.6 yrs. from start of maintenance. 2 of the 10 patients relapsed on MT with CNS involvement. Overall tolerability was acceptable, adverse events which lead to dose reductions for IFN-a were noted in 9 of 18 evaluable pts. Nine pts. suffered from moderate depression or fatigue. Hematologic toxicity during MT with IM+ IFN-a was mild with grade III cytopenia developing in only 2 pts. Conclusions: In elderly Ph+ALL pts. ineligible for allogeneic SCT, maintenance with IM in combination with low-dose IFN-a results in long-term sustained remissions in a substantial proportion of patients, with acceptable side effects. Surprisingly, the level of MRD was not predictive for remission duration. The lack of relationship between number of consolidation cycles and remission duration suggests IM+IFN-a MT may be effective even if started earlier during front-line therapy. Evaluation of the more potent 2nd generation TKI in combination with LD IFN-a as MT for Ph+ALL is warrented. Disclosures: Ottmann: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2608-2608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Pfeifer ◽  
Christoph Wettner ◽  
Barbara Wassmann ◽  
Aristoteles A.N. Giagounidis ◽  
Matthias Stelljes ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2608 Background: Combined treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and ALL-type induction and consolidation chemotherapy followed by allogeneic SCT is standard front-line therapy for younger patients with Ph+ALL, but the value of adding intensive chemotherapy to a TKI in elderly patients is controversial. More than 90% of elderly patients achieve a complete remission, irrespective of the type of TKI-based induction, but relapse is the major cause of treatment failure. In a previously reported randomized trial examining imatinib combined with intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy for Ph+ALL in elderly patients (n=55), the probability of overall survival (OS) after 24 months was 42% ± 8% (Ottmann OG et al., Cancer. 2007; 109:2068-76). To date, very little published data on long-term outcome of elderly patients with Ph+ALL are available. Aims: We conducted the present analysis to determine whether subsets of patients derive long-term benefit from combined imatinib plus intensive chemoptherapy, examine the characteristics of long-term survivors, determine whether such patients can be identified by assessment of MRD, and obtain preliminary results on the feasibility and efficacy of SCT in this population of elderly patient. Study design and patients demographics: Our current analysis includes a total of 121 patients (119 ALL, 2 CML in lymphoid blast crisis), with a median age of 66 years (range 54–80). Fifty-five patients were enrolled in a previously reported randomized clinical trial comparing single-agent imatinib and chemotherapy as induction therapy, followed by up to 6 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy; a further 67 patients were subsequently treated according to this protocol as per recommendation by the GMALL Study Group. Results: The overall CR rate was 88%, median time to progression was 14.5 months (range 0.5–102) and OS was 18.6 months (range 0.5–102), respectively. Probabilities of remission duration, survival and TTP at 5 years were 19%, 22% and 19%, respectively. The type of initial induction therapy had no significant impact on OS and DFS. Of 113 pts, who were evaluable for comorbities, pulmonary disease was the only comorbidity associated with inferior outcome (median OS 13 months vs. 20 months, univariate analysis p=0.02). Allogeneic SCT was performed in CR1 in 12 patients and as salvage therapy in another 7 patients. Median age of these 19 patients was 62y (range 54–69). The time from diagnosis to SCT in CR1 was 4.6 months (2.9 mo – 16.8 mo) and from relapse to SCT in >CR1 3 months (2.1 mo – 6.1 mo). The 5yr OS in patients transplanted in CR1 vs. non-transplanted patients was superior (48% vs 22%). Remarkably, OS of the 7 patients transplanted beyond CR1 as part of salvage therapy was 43% after 4.5 years. With a median follow-up of 21.6 months (range 3.3– 54) after SCT, 8 patients are in ongoing CR with a median OS of 51.8 months from initial diagnosis (range 35 – 66), 5 pts. died in CR, 6 pts. relapsed. Conclusions: The combination of imatinib with intensive chemotherapy is feasible in elderly patients, but long-term survival is poor primarily due to high relapse rate. Allogeneic SCT in CR1 is superior to conventional therapy and should be considered as front-line therapy in this elderly patient population. The encouraging results of allogeneic SCT performed beyond CR1 suggest that SCT should be considered as definite postremission therapy in a larger proportion of elderly patients than is current practice. Disclosures: Ottmann: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3922-3922
Author(s):  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
David Martínez-Cuadrón ◽  
Concha Rivas ◽  
Salut Brunet ◽  
José David González-San Miguel ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is currently regarded as the best treatment option in relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The long-term outcome of salvage therapy using an ATO-based approach compared with chemotherapy based regimens is not well established. We analyze the clinical outcome of 151 APL patients relapsing after front-line therapy with ATRA and anthracycline, who received second-line therapy with chemotherapy or ATO-based regimens. Methods From June 1997 to May 2013, 151 patients (94 M/57 F; median age: 42 years, 2-81) relapsed after front-line therapy with PETHEMA trials. Patients presented with either molecular relapse (n=47) or hematological relapse (n=104). Sixty-seven patients (44%) followed salvage therapy with chemotherapy-based regimens (chemotherapy group) consisting of induction with mitoxantrone plus cytarabine plus ATRA (n=45), EMA (n=7), or other regimens (n=15). Patients not eligible for stem-cell transplantation (SCT) received consolidation with or without maintenance therapy. From October 2003, 84 patients (56%) received salvage therapy with ATO-based regimens (ATO group), comprising induction with ATO (0.15 mg/kg intravenously until CR, with ATRA [n=19] or chemotherapy [n=6]) followed by one consolidation cycle with ATO plus ATRA. If the post-consolidation bone marrow PCR was negative an autologous (auto)-SCT was recommended, when the PCR was still positive an allogeneic (allo)-SCT was planned. Patients not eligible for SCT received maintenance therapy with ATO plus ATRA with or without low-dose chemotherapy. Results Baseline characteristics, including sex, relapse-risk at primary diagnosis, morphologic and BCR subtype, as well as age at relapse and type of relapse, were similar in both cohorts of patients. Although not significant, patients rescued in the chemotherapy group presented earlier relapses (<18 months after initial APL diagnosis) (55% vs. 43%, P=0.13). CR rates were 85% in the chemotherapy group (8 deaths and 2 resistances) and 92% in the ATO group (4 deaths and 3 resistances) (P=0.11). In patients achieving second CR, a molecular CR was achieved after consolidation in 78% and 84%, respectively (P=0.38). Twenty-two patients in the chemotherapy group (39%) and 16 in the ATO group (21%) were not transplanted in second CR (P=0.04). The reasons for not SCT in the chemotherapy and in the ATO group were ineligibility for SCT (6 vs. 8 patients), early relapse before planned SCT (10 vs. 7 patients), and mobilization failure (6 vs. 1 patients). Overall, 34 patients underwent SCT in the chemotherapy group (auto-SCT, 20; allo-SCT, 14), and 57 underwent SCT in the ATO group (auto-SCT, 47; allo-SCT, 10). The median follow-up in the chemotherapy group was 95 months (range, 24-167), and 33 months (range, 3-100) in the ATO group. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) in the chemotherapy group and in the ATO group were 40% vs. 56% (P=0.01), 31% vs. 39% (P=0.07), and 34% vs. 48% (P=0.09), respectively. For patients not receiving SCT because of mobilization failure or ineligibility, the 5-year OS, DFS, and RFS in the chemotherapy group and in the ATO group were 56% vs. 19% (P=0.11), 42% vs. 19% (P=0.49), and 42% vs. 29% (P=0.63), respectively. For patients receiving auto-SCT, the 5-year OS, DFS, and RFS in the chemotherapy group and in the ATO group were 55% vs. 80% (P=0.04), 40% vs. 54% (P=0.06), and 44% vs. 57% (P=0.13), respectively. For patients receiving allo-SCT, the 5-year OS, DFS, and RFS in the chemotherapy group (P=0.48), and 31% vs. 57% (P=0.34), respectively. All but one patient underwent auto-SCT with negative PCR (this patient relapsed rapidly after auto-SCT). Regarding allo-SCT, 7 patients were PCR+ and 17 were PCR negative before SCT (5-year DFS 0% vs. 41%, respectively, P=0.01). Conclusions This study performed in a large series with prolonged follow-up of APL patients relapsing after upfront therapy with ATRA and anthracycline shows high rates of CR either with ATO (92%) or chemotherapy regimens (85%). Salvage therapy with ATO-based regimen allowed performing more frequently auto-SCT with negative PCR, and this strategy resulted in an overall improvement of the 5-year OS, DFS, and RFS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2817-2817
Author(s):  
Heike Pfeifer ◽  
Barbara Wassmann ◽  
Sylvia Wystub ◽  
Lydia Wunderle ◽  
Joerg Chromik ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (IM), alone or in combination with induction and post-remission chemotherapy, has become the mainstay of front-line treatment for Ph+ ALL, followed by allogeneic SCT as a potentially curative treatment option. However, alloSCT is not feasible in many elderly or comorbid patients. In a prospective, randomized clinical trial of elderly patients with de novo Ph+ ALL, we recently demonstrated that IM induction followed by IM in combination with intensive consolidation chemotherapy of approximately one year duration was feasible in the majority of pts. but associated with a high relapse rate. To assess the impact of IM-based maintenance, we here provide an analysis of maintenance therapy with IM either alone, in combination with low dose interferon-α (LD-IFNα), or with zoledronic acid. In addition, we examined whether determination of minimal residual disease (MRD) and/or BCR-ABL mutation status prior to and during pre-maintenance therapy were predictive of freedom from relapse and remission duration. Patients and Methods: Remission induction and consolidation therapy have been reported previously (Ottmann et al.,Cancer109:2068–76, 2007). As the present analysis focuses entirely on the maintenance phase, patients who failed to achieve a CR, relapsed or died during the consolidation cycles are not included. Following a median of 6 cycles of remission induction and consolidation chemotherapy given concurrently with IM, 33 CR pts. (n=33; median age 69.5 yrs; [58–75 yrs.]) were enrolled either in a clinical trial of IM in combination with low-dose IFN (n=19), or with zoledronic acid (n=4), or received Glivec as a single agent (n=8). Minimal residual disease was serially assessed by quantitative RT-PCR and mutational analyses was performed by D-HPLC and direct sequencing. Results: With a median duration of maintenance of 17 months (range 6–72 mos.), 14 of 33 patients (42%) are in ongoing CR, with a median maintenance duration of 46 mos. (20–72 mos.). Median overall survival of all patients is 28 mos. (range: 9–81 mos.). Detection of a BCR-ABL mutation at or within 4 weeks of initial diagnosis was associated with inferior remission duration, 18 mos. versus 27 mos. (p=0.06). Remission was independent of the MRD response during induction and consolidation: 24 mos. and 26 mos. in pts. who did or did not achieve MRD negativity at any time; similarly, detection of MRD at the start of maintenance had no impact on time to progression. Conclusions: Among elderly Ph+ALL pts. who did not undergo SCT, treatment outcome with IM-based maintenance therapy is encouraging, but remissions are not sustained in the majority of patients. Surprisingly, persistent MRD positivity during consolidation or at the start of maintenance were not associated with an inferior outcome; conversely, relapses occurred even in patients who had achieved prolonged MRD negativity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (20) ◽  
pp. 2260-2267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Landsburg ◽  
Marissa K. Falkiewicz ◽  
Joseph Maly ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Christina Howlett ◽  
...  

Purpose Patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) rarely achieve long-term survival following disease relapse. Some patients with DHL undergo consolidative autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) to reduce the risk of relapse, although the benefit of this treatment strategy is unclear. Methods Patients with DHL who achieved first complete remission following completion of front-line therapy with either rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or intensive front-line therapy, and deemed fit for autoSCT, were included. A landmark analysis was performed, with time zero defined as 3 months after completion of front-line therapy. Patients who experienced relapse before or who were not followed until that time were excluded. Results Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 80% and 87%, respectively, for all patients (n = 159). Three-year RFS and OS rates did not differ significantly for autoSCT (n = 62) versus non-autoSCT patients (n = 97), but 3-year RFS was inferior in patients who received R-CHOP compared with intensive therapy (56% v 88%; P = .002). Three-year RFS and OS did not differ significantly for patients in the R-CHOP or intensive therapy cohorts when analyzed by receipt of autoSCT. The median OS following relapse was 8.6 months. Conclusion In the largest reported series, to our knowledge, of patients with DHL to achieve first complete remission, consolidative autoSCT was not associated with improved 3-year RFS or OS. In addition, patients treated with R-CHOP experienced inferior 3-year RFS compared with those who received intensive front-line therapy. When considered in conjunction with reports of patients with newly diagnosed DHL, which demonstrate lower rates of disease response to R-CHOP compared with intensive front-line therapy, our findings further support the use of intensive front-line therapy for this patient population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger W Chapman ◽  
Kate D Lynch

Abstract Introduction Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a semi-synthetic hydrophobic bile acid (BA) analogue that is highly selective agonist of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a key nuclear BA receptor, which induces expression of gut-derived hormones, in particular fibroblast growth factor 19. The resulting beneficial effects of OCA on glucose and lipid metabolism and particularly hepatic inflammation make it a candidate for the treatment of a variety of conditions including primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Sources of data In PBC patients who have not initially responded to ursodeoxycholic acid, OCA has been shown in double-blind controlled clinical trials to significantly reduce serum alkaline phosphatase. To date, OCA is the only therapy licensed by the FDA, EMA and endorsed by NICE as second line therapy for PBC. No medications are currently approved in Europe or the USA for the treatment of NASH. In recent clinical trials, OCA has been shown encouraging results by improving liver blood tests and reducing liver fibrosis with no worsening of NASH. Areas of agreement OCA is the established second line therapy for PBC in those patients who fail to adequately respond to ursodeoxycholic acid. Areas of controversy The main side effects of OCA treatment in both PBC and NASH is that of dose-dependent pruritis which can lead to treatment discontinuation in ~1–10% of patients. In addition, OCA-treated patients may also exhibit (reversible) alterations in serum lipid levels; most notably a small decrease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol. It is not yet known whether these changes carry a long-term cardiovascular risk in NASH. In addition, the relatively high cost of OCA may limit its use in cash-limited health systems. Growing Points Additional clinical trials are in progress to ascertain the long-term effects of OCA on survival in PBC and NASH. Areas timely for developing research New FXR agonists with a lower rate of side effects are being developed and trialed. Combination therapy with other agents may offer increased efficacy.


1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Nicolella ◽  
Giuseppe Grimaldi ◽  
Giuseppe Colantuoni ◽  
Mario Belli ◽  
Giuseppe Frasci ◽  
...  

Aims and background The treatment of elderly patients with metastatic solid tumours is still a debated problem. Patients over 75 years are generally excluded from combination chemotherapy trials because of higher toxicity. Several clinical studies have shown that weekly low dose epirubicin is a well tolerated and effective treatment for elderly cancer patients (breast, prostate, lung). Methods We report a study of patients aged between 75 and 85 years affected by metastatic anthracyclines-sensible carcinomas, to assess the tolerance of epirubicin given weekly at a dose of 25 mg/m2. Results 25 patients (13 males, 12 females; ECOG P.S. 0-2) entered the study and were evaluable for side effects. One-hundred and ninety-six cycles of therapy have been administered. Side effects were never severe. Mucositis (9 patients), leucopenia (7 patients), anemia (5 patients) were usually of grade 1 or 2. Grade 1 cardiotoxicity (tachycardia) was observed in only one case. Grade 3 toxicity consisted in anemia (1 patient) and mucositis (1 patient), while grade 4 toxicity never occurred. Nineteen patients were evaluable for response: 0 CR, 4 PR (1 lung, 3 breast), 8 SD (3 lung, 3 breast, 2 prostate) have been observed. Compliance was encouraging and the majority of patients showed a decrease in symptoms and an improvement in performance status. Conclusions Weekly low-dose epirubicin is a very well tolerated treatment in elderly cancer patients. In view of the negligible toxicity encountered, it could be of utility to test this regimen in patients aged 75 years or older, affected by anthracyclines-sensible metastatic tumors, also to assess activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document