Consolidation Therapy with Subcutaneous (SC) Alemtuzumab After Fludarabine and Rituximab (FR) Induction Therapy Improves the Complete Response (CR) Rate in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Eradicates Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) but Is Associated with Severe Infectious Toxicity: Final Analysis of CALGB Study 10101.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
Thomas S Lin ◽  
Kathleen A Donohue ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Margaret S Lucas ◽  
Eva Hoke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 210 Background: Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) is approved for the treatment of CLL. CALGB sought to determine whether alemtuzumab can improve the CR rate and eradicate MRD after induction chemoimmunotherapy by performing a phase II study administering FR followed by alemtuzumab consolidation to previously untreated, symptomatic CLL patients (pts). We previously reported preliminary toxicity data (Lin et al. ASH 2007) and now report final toxicity and response data. Methods: Pts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1–5, and rituximab 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 325 mg/m2 on day 3, and 375 mg/m2 on day 5 of cycle 1 and then only on day 1 of cycles 2–6, repeated every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. Four months after the last fludarabine dose, pts with stable (SD) or responsive disease by NCI 96 criteria received SC alemtuzumab 3 mg on day 1, 10 mg on day 3, and 30 mg on day 5, and then thrice weekly thereafter for 6 weeks (18 total doses). Pts received standard Pneumocystis (PCP) and Varicella zoster virus prophylaxis and were monitored weekly by PCR for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia. When unacceptable serious infectious toxicity was noted in pts who received alemtuzumab after achieving CR from FR induction, the study was amended so that only PR or SD pts received alemtuzumab after FR. Results: Median age of pts (n=102) was 61 years (range, 23–82), 74% were male, and 30% were Rai stage III/IV. FR was well tolerated; 93% of pts received at least 3 cycles, and 77% completed all 6 cycles. Overall, complete and partial response (OR, CR, PR) rates after FR induction were 90%, 29% and 61%, and 15% were MRD negative by flow cytometry. Fifty-eight pts received alemtuzumab, and 42 (72%) completed the planned 6 weeks of therapy. OR, CR, and PR rates after alemtuzumab (n=58) were 91%, 66% and 26%, and 50% were MRD negative. Twenty-eight of 45 pts (62%) in PR after FR who received alemtuzumab attained CR. Of 11 pts in CR after FR who received alemtuzumab, 5 were MRD negative prior to consolidation and 3 of the other 6 converted to MRD negative afterwards. By intent-to-treat for all patients enrolled, OR, CR, and MRD negativity were attained by 90%, 57% and 42% of pts. With a median follow up of 34 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 37 months (95% CI, 33–43 months); PFS was 73% and overall survival (OS) 86% at 2 years. Two-year PFS (76% vs 70%, p=0.54) and OS (84% vs 88%, p=0.89) were similar for pts who did and did not receive alemtuzumab. Similarly, there were no differences in PFS or OS among the 30 pts in CR after FR whether or not they received alemtuzumab, although the numbers were small. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 43% and 19% of pts during alemtuzumab therapy. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity was observed in 41% of pts, including 19% infections and 19% febrile neutropenia, during alemtuzumab therapy. As we previously reported, 5 pts in CR after FR who received alemtuzumab died from infections (viral meningitis, Listeria meningitis, Legionella pneumonia, CMV and PCP pneumonia), and one pt in PR after FR who received alemtuzumab died of Epstein-Barr (EBV) viremia without evidence of EBV lymphoma. These grade 5 toxicities occurred both during and for up to 7 months after alemtuzumab therapy. Conclusions: Alemtuzumab consolidation improved the CR and MRD negative rates after FR induction. However, alemtuzumab consolidation resulted in significant toxicity, particularly severe infections in pts who achieved a CR after FR induction. Longer follow up is needed to determine if the improved CR and MRD negative rates following alemtuzumab consolidation will eventually result in improved PFS or OS, especially among pts who achieved a PR after FR induction. Disclosures: Lin: GlaxoSmithkline: Consultancy, Employment; Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Use of alemtuzumab as consolidation therapy. Byrd:Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Link:Genentech: Consultancy. Rai:Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Consolidation Therapy With Subcutaneous Alemtuzumab After Fludarabine and Rituximab Induction Therapy for Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Analysis of CALGB 10101

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (29) ◽  
pp. 4500-4506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Kathleen A. Donohue ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Margaret S. Lucas ◽  
Eva E. Hoke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Listeria Meningitis ◽  
Intent To Treat

PurposeTo determine if alemtuzumab consolidation improves response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemoimmunotherapy in previously untreated symptomatic patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Patients and MethodsPatients (n = 102) received fludarabine 25 mg/m2intravenously days 1 to 5 and rituximab 50 mg/m2day 1, 325 mg/m2day 3, and 375 mg/m2day 5 of cycle 1 and then 375 mg/m2day 1 of cycles 2 to 6; fludarabine plus rituximab (FR) administration was repeated every 28 days for six cycles. Three months after completion of FR, patients with stable disease or better response received subcutaneous alemtuzumab 3 mg day 1, 10 mg day 3, and 30 mg day 5 and then 30 mg three times per week for 5 weeks.ResultsOverall response (OR), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR) rates were 90%, 29%, and 61% after FR, respectively; 15% of patients were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. Of 102 patients, 58 received alemtuzumab; 28 (61%) of 46 patients achieving PR after FR attained CR after alemtuzumab. By intent to treat (n = 102), OR and CR rates were 90% and 57% after alemtuzumab, respectively; 42% of patients became MRD negative. With median follow-up of 36 months, median PFS was 36 months, 2-year PFS was 72%, and 2-year OS was 86%. In patients achieving CR after FR, alemtuzumab was associated with five deaths resulting from infection (viral and Listeria meningitis and Legionella, cytomegalovirus, and Pneumocystis pneumonias), which occurred up to 7 months after last therapy. The study was amended to exclude CR patients from receiving alemtuzumab.ConclusionAlemtuzumab consolidation improved CR and MRD-negative rates after FR induction but caused serious infections in patients who had already achieved CR after induction and did not improve 2-year PFS or survival.

Venetoclax plus Dose-Adjusted R-EPOCH (VR-EPOCH) for Richter's Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Kerry A. Rogers ◽  
Svitlana Tyekucheva ◽  
Zixu Wang ◽  
Samantha Pazienza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Therapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Richter’S Syndrome

Richter's Syndrome (RS) of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is typically chemoresistant, with a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that the oral Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax could sensitize RS to chemoimmunotherapy and improve outcomes. We conducted a single-arm, investigator-sponsored, phase 2 trial of venetoclax plus dose-adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (VR-EPOCH) to determine the rate of complete response (CR). Patients received R-EPOCH for 1 cycle, then after count recovery, accelerated daily venetoclax ramp-up to 400 mg, then VR-EPOCH for up to 5 more 21-day cycles. Responders received venetoclax maintenance or cellular therapy off-study. Twenty-six patients were treated, and 13 of 26 (50%) achieved CR, with 11 achieving undetectable bone marrow minimal residual disease for CLL. Three additional patients achieved partial response (overall response rate 62%). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months, and median overall survival was 19.6 months. Hematologic toxicity included grade ≥3 neutropenia (65%) and thrombocytopenia (50%), with febrile neutropenia in 38%. No patients experienced tumor lysis syndrome with daily venetoclax ramp-up. VR-EPOCH is active in RS, with deeper, more durable responses than historical regimens. Toxicities from intensive chemoimmunotherapy and venetoclax were observed. Our data suggest that studies comparing venetoclax with chemoimmunotherapy to chemoimmunotherapy alone are warranted. (Funded by Genentech/AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03054896).

Long-term follow-up of previously untreated patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with ofatumumab (OFA) and chlorambucil (CHL): Final analysis of the phase 3 COMPLEMENT 1 trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7528-7528
Author(s):  
Fritz Offner ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Ann Janssens ◽  
Govind Babu Kanakasetty ◽  
Janusz Kloczko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Grade 3

7528 Background: Previously in the COMPLEMENT 1 study, treatment with OFA and CHL in pts with untreated CLL had shown a significant improvement in the progression-free survival (PFS) compared with CHL alone, and was well tolerated. Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis of the 5-year (y) follow-up, updated investigator-assessed PFS and safety from the study. Methods: Untreated pts, not fit for fludarabine-based therapy (due to advanced age or co-morbidities) were randomized 1:1 to OFA+CHL or CHL alone. Pts in OFA+CHL arm received OFA (Cycle 1: 300 mg day (d) 1, 1000 mg d8; subsequent cycles: 1000 mg d1) in addition to CHL (10 mg/m2, d1-7) for 3 to 12 cycles of 28 d each. Pts in CHL arm received CHL only. Results: Overall, 447 pts were randomized to OFA+CHL (n = 221) or CHL (n = 226); 168 (76%) and 164 (73%) pts completed the scheduled treatments, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. The investigator-assessed median PFS was 23.4 months (mos) in the OFA+CHL arm and 14.7 mos in the CHL arm (HR: 0.61 [95% CI 0.49, 0.76], p < 0.001). Median OS could not be estimated for the OFA+CHL arm and was 84.7 mos for the CHL arm (HR: 0.88 [95% CI 0.65, 1.17], p = 0.363). Estimated OS rate (95% CI) at 5 y was 68.5% (61.5%, 74.5%) in the OFA+CHL arm, and 65.7% (58.6%, 71.9%) in the CHL arm. Post-treatment anti-cancer therapy after discontinuation was received by a greater proportion of pts in the CHL (66%) vs. OFA+CHL (56%), and started earlier in the CHL arm (486 d) vs. OFA+CHL (743 d) arm. Overall, 84 (39%) pts in the OFA+CHL, and 99 (44%) pts in the CHL arms died during the study with 5 on-treatment deaths in each group. Grade ≥3 adverse events were seen in 64% and 48% of pts in the OFA+CHL vs. CHL arms, respectively, most common being (≥5% in either arm) neutropenia (26% vs. 15%), thrombocytopenia (5% vs. 10%), pneumonia (9% vs. 5%), and anemia (5% vs. 5%). Conclusions: This 5-y survival follow-up analysis supported the results from primary analysis with an estimated 12% (not significant) and 39% risk reduction in OS and PFS, respectively, in the OFA+CHL arm compared with the CHL arm. No new safety concerns were observed in the OFA+CHL arm. Clinical trial information: NCT00748189.

Addition of Rituximab to Fludarabine Improves Progression Free Survival in Untreated ZAP-70 Negative Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 477-477
Author(s):  
Maria Ilaria Del Principe ◽  
Giovanni Del Poeta ◽  
Luca Maurillo ◽  
Adriano Venditti ◽  
Francesco Buccisano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies in combination with chemotherapy have reported previously unattained response rates in CLL because this approach reduces disease burden to levels detectable only by flow cytometry or molecular methods. The latest studies from CALGB have demonstrated that rituximab added concurrently or sequentially to fludarabine (Flu) for symptomatic, untreated CLL allows to achieve higher remission rates, longer progression free and overall survival. Nevertheless, the analysis of different biologic parameters could better explain the discordant outcome independent of treatment observed in these studies. Recent literature data indicate that unmutated VH genes, CD38 and/or ZAP-70 protein tyrosine kinase overexpression may predict both a lower response and a shorter survival. We performed at our Institution a phase II study that added rituximab sequentially to Flu as initial therapy for symptomatic, untreated CLL in order to evaluate either the toxicity or the clinical response or outcome. Complete remission (CR) was also assessed by a multiparametric flow cytometric method. ZAP-70 protein and CD38 antigen were determined before chemotherapy on mononuclear cells by flow cytometry using an anti-ZAP-70 and an anti-CD38 antibody, respectively. Forty-nine B-CLL patients, median age 59 years (range 37–74) received six monthly courses of Flu (25 mg/m2 for 5 days) and four weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) starting on an average of thirty days (range 5–180) after completion of the Flu therapy. According to modified Rai stages, 4 pts had a low stage, 42 an intermediate stage and 3 a high stage. Three out of 49 pts experienced fever, chills and rigors, during the first infusion of rituximab and only 1 patient presented grade 3 infective lung toxicity according to WHO. Hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (grade 1 and/or 2 in 12 pts, grade 3 and/or 4 in 22 pts), thrombocytopenia (grade 1 and/or 2 in 4, grade 3 and/or 4 in 3 pts) and anemia (grade 2 in 3 pts). Based on the NCI criteria, 45/49 (91.8%) pts achieved a CR, 3/49 (6.1%) a partial remission (PR) and 1/49 (2%) no response (NR). The median follow-up duration was 29 months. Median duration of CR and PR has not been reached. Noteworthy, our B-CLL pts treated sequentially with Flu and rituximab experienced a very long progression-free survival (PFS) from treatment (72% at 3 years). ZAP-70 and CD38 were positive (&gt;20%) in 19/48 (39.5%) and in 13/48 (27%) pts, respectively. Minimal residual disease (MRD) performed on bone marrow by flow cytometry was positive (&gt;5% CD19+CD5+CD79b- CLL cells) in 7/37 (19%) analysed pts. A significant shorter PFS was observed in ZAP-70+ pts (38% vs 100% at 3 years; P=0.003), in CD38+ pts (39% vs 92% at 3 years; P=0.007) and also in pts with higher MRD after treatment (50% vs 81% at 2 years; P=0.04). Therefore, the addition of monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, to chemotherapy allowed a better outcome in CLL, exerting a key role to eradicate MRD. Moreover, the stratification of pts within different risk classes using novel biologic predictive factors, such as ZAP-70 and CD38, might allow us to offer more tailored treatment strategies, reserving experimental approaches and/or transplantation procedures only to CLL subsets with proved adverse biologic and clinical features.

scholarly journals Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
pp. 936-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Voorhees ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Douglas W. Sborov ◽  
Brandi Reeves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

Abstract Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N = 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P = .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided α of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P = .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10−5 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P &lt; .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 × 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.

scholarly journals Ofatumumab maintenance prolongs progression-free survival in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: final analysis of the PROLONG study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marinus van Oers ◽  
Lukas Smolej ◽  
Mario Petrini ◽  
Fritz Offner ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Third Line Treatment

AbstractWe report the final analysis of the PROLONG study on ofatumumab maintenance in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In all, 480 patients with CLL in complete or partial remission after second- or third-line treatment were randomized 1:1 to ofatumumab (300 mg first week, followed by 1000 mg every 8 weeks for up to 2 years) or observation. Median follow-up duration was 40.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 34.2 and 16.9 months for ofatumumab and observation arms, respectively, (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% confidence interval, 0.43–0.70]; P < 0.0001). Median time to next treatment for ofatumumab and observation arms, respectively, was 37.4 and 27.6 months (0.72 [0.57–0.91]; P = 0.0044). Overall survival was similar in both arms; median was not reached (0.99 [0.72–1.37]). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 62% and 51% of patients in ofatumumab and observation arms, respectively, the most common being neutropenia (23% and 10%), pneumonia (13% and 12%) and febrile neutropenia (6% and 4%). Up to 60 days after the last treatment, four deaths were reported in the ofatumumab arm versus six in the observation arm, none considered related to ofatumumab. Ofatumumab maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with relapsed CLL and was well tolerated.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide as initial therapy of elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (13) ◽  
pp. 3489-3498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier C. Badoux ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Sijin Wen ◽  
Bang-Ning Lee ◽  
Mariela Sivina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The best initial therapy for elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not yet been defined. We investigated the activity of lenalidomide as initial therapy for elderly patients with CLL. Sixty patients with CLL 65 years of age and older received treatment with lenalidomide orally 5 mg daily for 56 days, then titrated up to 25 mg/d as tolerated. Treatment was continued until disease progression. At a median follow-up of 29 months, 53 patients (88%) are alive and 32 patients (53%) remain on therapy. Estimated 2-year progression-free survival is 60%. The overall response rate to lenalidomide therapy is 65%, including 10% complete response, 5% complete response with residual cytopenia, 7% nodular partial response, and 43% partial response. Neutropenia is the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity observed in 34% of treatment cycles. Major infections or neutropenic fever occurred in 13% of patients. Compared with baseline levels, we noted an increase in serum immunoglobulin levels across all classes, and a reduction in CCL3 and CCL4 plasma levels was noted in responding patients. Lenalidomide therapy was well tolerated and induced durable remissions in this population of elderly, symptomatic patients with CLL. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00535873.

scholarly journals Efficacy of venetoclax plus rituximab for relapsed CLL: Five-year follow-up of continuous or limited-duration therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Ma ◽  
John F. Seymour ◽  
Danielle M. Brander ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Continuous Exposure ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Discontinue Therapy ◽  
Limited Duration

We report long-term follow-up of the phase 1b study of venetoclax and rituximab (VenR) in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including outcomes with continuous or limited-duration therapy. Patients received venetoclax daily (200-600 mg) and rituximab over 6 months, then venetoclax monotherapy. Patients achieving complete response (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), or undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) assessed by flow cytometry (&lt;10-4 cutoff) were allowed, but not required, to discontinue therapy, while remaining on study and could be re-treated with VenR upon progression. Median follow-up for all patients (N=49) was 5.3 years. Five-year rates for overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response were 86% (95% CI, 72-94), 56% (40-70), and 58% (40-73), respectively. Of the 33 deep responders (CR/CRi or uMRD), 14 remained on venetoclax monotherapy (continuous therapy), and 19 stopped venetoclax therapy (limited-duration therapy) after a median of 1.4 years. Five-year estimates of ongoing response were similar between continuous (71% [95% CI, 39-88]) or limited-duration therapy (79% [49-93]). Six of 19 patients in the latter group had subsequent disease progression, all &gt;2 years off venetoclax (range, 2.1-6.4). Four patients were re-treated with VenR, with partial responses observed in the 3 evaluable to date. VenR induced deep responses that were highly durable with either continuous or limited-duration therapy. Retreatment with VenR induced responses in patients with CLL progression after discontinuing therapy. Continuous exposure to venetoclax in deep responders does not appear to provide incremental benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01682616

Lendalidomide Consolidation After First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy for Patients with Previously Untreated CLL

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1379-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tait Shanafelt ◽  
Han Tun ◽  
Curtis Hanson ◽  
Clive S. Zent ◽  
Jose Leis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1379 Background: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has substantially improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40–50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays for minimal residual disease (MRD). While this observation created interest in consolidation therapy, previous alemtuzumab based consolidation trials have demonstrated excess morbidity/mortality. We conducted a lenalidomide based consolidation trial for patients with previously untreated CLL who received 6 cycles of induction with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR). Methods: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment according to the NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Treatment schema consisted of 6 cycles of pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 21 days (Blood 109:405). All patients completing 6 cycles of PCR, underwent complete restaging and evaluation for MRD using sensitive flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956). Following restaging and adequate recovery of blood counts, patients received 6 mos of lenalidomide consolidation by continuous daily administration. The starting lenalidomide dose was 5 mg/day with escalation to 10 mg/day after the first cycle as tolerated. Patients again underwent complete restaging and MRD evaluation after 6 mos of lenalidomide. At the time of this restaging, MRD negative patients entered observation. Those with residual disease continued on lenalidomide and underwent repeat MRD assessment every 3 mos with cessation of lenalidomide when an MRD negative state achieved. Results: 45 patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic between 3/2008 and 11/2009. 44 patients were eligible for treatment: 71% male, median age 65 (range: 44–78); intermediate Rai risk 61%; high Rai risk 39%. On prognostic testing 32% were CD38+, 52% Zap-70 +, 52% IGHV unmutated, and 16% had high risk FISH (del 17p13; del 11q22). 38 of 44 eligible patients (86%) completed 6 cycles of PCR induction. Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to PCR induction included 19 (43%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 9 (20%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. The Overall response rate to induction was 98% with 15 CR/CRi, 3 CCR, 9 nPR, and 16 PR. Four patients with CR were also MRD negative at the completion of induction. Of 38 patients who completed induction, 34 initiated lenalidomide consolidation. Thus, by protocol intent to treat analysis, 34/44 (77%) patients starting CIT with PCR were able to receive consolidation therapy. The remaining patients were unable to initiate consolidation due to: failure to complete induction (6 patients), disease progression (1), adverse event (1) and patient refusal (2). Among the 34 patients who initiated consolidation, the median number of cycles of lenalidomide received was 5.5 (range: 1–19). Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to lenalidomide consolidation included 22 (65%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 4 (12%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. Among the 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of lenalidomide, 4 patients have improved the quality of their response to date with 11 patients still on lenalidomide at the time of this report. After median follow-up of 16 mos, 42/44 patients are alive and median duration of response has not been reached. To date 3/44 (7%) of patients have progressed to require additional treatment. Finally, since eligibility was nearly identical to our historic trial of PCR without lenalidomide consolidation, we compared the 44 patients in the present trial to the 64 patients previously treated on our PCR trial (Blood 109:405). Demographic and prognostic characteristics of the patients in the two studies were similar. With the caveat it represents comparison across phase II trials, the proportion of patients free of retreatment at 12 mos was 97% (95%CI: 91–100) for PCR-L vs. 78% (95%CI: 68–89) for PCR (Figure 1). Conclusion: We report here the first results of lenalidomide based consolidation for CLL patients receiving first-line CIT induction. Although lenalidomide consolidation appears to improve the quality of response and prolong time to retreatment, longer follow-up is necessary to determine the clinical benefit of this strategy. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. Kay:Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Daratumumab (DARA) maintenance or observation (OBS) after treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd) with or without DARA and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): CASSIOPEIA Part 2.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8004-8004
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Depth Of Response

8004 Background: D-VTd plus ASCT was approved for transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM based on part 1 of CASSIOPEIA. We report a prespecified interim analysis of CASSIOPEIA part 2: DARA maintenance vs OBS in pts with ≥partial response (PR) in part 1, regardless of induction/consolidation (ind/cons) treatment. Methods: CASSIOPEIA is a 2-part, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study in TE NDMM. Pts received 4 cycles ind and 2 cycles cons with D-VTd or VTd. 886 pts who achieved ≥PR were rerandomized to DARA 16 mg/kg IV Q8W for up to 2 yr (n = 442) or OBS (n = 444) until progressive disease per IMWG. Pts were stratified by ind (D-VTd vs VTd) and depth of response (minimum residual disease [MRD] status and post cons response ≥PR). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after second randomization. This interim analysis assessed efficacy and safety after 281 PFS events. A preplanned hierarchical procedure tested key secondary endpoints: time to progression (TTP), ≥complete response (CR), MRD negativity rates by NGS and overall survival (OS). Results: At median follow-up of 35.4 mo, median PFS was not reached (NR) with DARA and 46.7 mo with OBS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.42–0.68; P <0.0001). PFS advantage for DARA was consistent across most subgroups. However, a prespecified analysis showed significant interaction with ind/cons treatment arm ( P< 0.0001). PFS HR for DARA vs OBS was 0.32 (95% CI 0.23–0.46) in the VTd arm and 1.02 (0.71–1.47) in the D-VTd arm. Median TTP was NR for DARA vs 46.7 mo for OBS (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.38–0.62; P <0.0001). More pts in the DARA vs OBS arm achieved ≥CR (72.9% vs 60.8%; OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.54–3.07; P <0.0001). MRD negativity (in ≥CR pts at 10-5) was 58.6% with DARA vs 47.1% with OBS (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.33–2.43; P= 0.0001). Median OS was NR in either arm. Most common (≥2.5%) grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) with DARA vs OBS were pneumonia (2.5% vs 1.4%), lymphopenia (3.6% vs 1.8%), and hypertension (3.0% vs 1.6%). Serious AEs occurred in 22.7% (DARA) vs 18.9% (OBS) of pts; the most common (≥2.5%) was pneumonia (2.5% vs 1.6%). 13 (3.0%) pts discontinued DARA due to an AE. The rate of infusion-related reactions was 54.5% (DARA-naïve pts) and 2.2% (prior DARA pts); 90% were grade 1/2.Second primary malignancies occurred in 5.5% (DARA) vs 2.7% (OBS) of pts. Conclusions: CASSIOPEIA part 2 demonstrated a clinical benefit of DARA maintenance in TE NDMM pts, with significantly longer PFS for DARA vs OBS. With current follow-up, maintenance PFS benefit appeared only in pts treated with VTd as ind/cons. Pts who received D-VTd ind/cons with or without DARA maintenance achieved similar PFS; longer follow-up is needed for PFS2 and OS. DARA significantly increased deeper response and MRD negativity rates vs OBS, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02541383.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document