Transfusion Dependence and Low Hemoglobin Have the Greatest Impact On Quality of Life (QOL) in MDS Patients - a Tertiary Care Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2500-2500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rena Buckstein ◽  
Shabbir Alibhai ◽  
Adam Lam ◽  
Liying Zhang ◽  
Alex Mamedov ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2500 Poster Board II-477 Background: There are few prospective longitudinal data evaluating QOL in MDS, a disease characterized by chronic anemia and transfusion dependence in many patients. Furthermore, the effects of various drug therapies on QOL are little known but essential for cost-effectiveness studies. We have been conducting prospective assessments of QOL in all consenting patients registered in our MDS clinic using the instruments EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-An/Fatigue, EQ5D and a global fatigue scale. We present cross-sectional results in the first 93 patients evaluated prospectively over 14.7 months. Methods: We analyzed QOL according to age, hemoglobin, IPSS risk group, transfusion dependence (Y/N), drug therapy and ferritin. Changes in QOL in the 64 (67%) patients with repeat assessments at a median time of 3 months were also examined. We examined the correlation between QOL scores using Spearman's correlation coefficient. We compared raw scores for clinically significant differences between MDS patients and normative data. Clinically significant (CS) score differences were considered 10 points for the EORTC, 7 for the FACT-An, and 4 for the FACT-Fatigue. Statistical significance (SS) using p<0.05 was determined using logistic and linear regression analysis to compare QOL scores adjusting for up to 3 additional confounding variables and non-parametric tests were used to compare risk groups (e.g., ferritin > 1000 vs. =< 1000 ug/L) on QOL scores without adjustment for confounders. Results: The median age was 71 y, with 59% males. Of the 89 patients with measurable IPSS scores, 84% fell into low/low intermediate risk categories and 7% had del 5q abnormality. 40% were transfusion dependent, 20% were receiving lenalidomide, 21% iron chelation and 21% growth factors. 50% had a Hgb of <100 g/L at time of study and the median ferritin was 837 ug/L. Comparing MDS QOL scores with normative scores from the general population, we observed SS and CS differences in the following 9 scales: worse physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning; worse global QOL; increased fatigue, nausea, vomiting and pain on the QLQ-C30 function and symptoms scales; and increased fatigue on the FACT-Fatigue subscale. By linear regression analysis of QOL scores, transfusion dependence and Hgb level < 100 were the most powerful and independent predictors for impaired global health status (p=.03 and .01) but transfusion dependence was the most significant predictor of global fatigue (p=.012), impaired physical functioning (p=.002), impaired social functioning (p=.001), global health status (p=.03), and financial problems (p=.001). Increasing age was independently predictive of impaired physical functioning and appetite loss. QOL scores did not differ significantly between patients on or off lenalidomide, growth factors or iron chelation however, patients on lenalidomide who were transfusion independent had CS improved physical, emotional and social functioning and global health status /QOL compared with those who remained transfusion dependent. Eleven of 63 patients who had repeated QOL assessments increased their Hgb to >100 g/L and demonstrated increased global health status QOL (p=.03). Finally, the visual analogue scores (derived) from the single-item global fatigue and the EQ-5D health state scales correlated very strongly with virtually every symptom and functional domain of the QLQ-C30 as did the FACT-An and EQ-5D. The UK converted EQ-5D summary state utilities /self-reported scores and EORTC QLQ-C30 global health scores are in the table below. Conclusions: Most domains of QOL are impaired and symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea are increased in MDS and most dependent on transfusion dependence and Hgb, particularly if the Hgb is <100 g/L. Simple numerical rating scales for global health and fatigue may be convenient screening tools to employ in the clinic for QOL assessment. Utility scores derived from longitudinal QOL data in MDS patients treated with different agents are both feasible and essential to calculate QALYs in this era of cost constraints and pharmaco-economic modeling. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4076-4076 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Folprecht ◽  
M. Nowacki ◽  
I. Lang ◽  
S. Cascinu ◽  
I. Shchepotin ◽  
...  

4076 Background: Assessing QoL is important to evaluate the impact of treatment on pts with mCRC. The phase III CRYSTAL trial compared cetuximab plus FOLFIRI with FOLFIRI alone in the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); QoL was a secondary endpoint. Methods: Pts were randomised 1:1 to cetuximab (400 mg/m2 initial dose then 250 mg/m2/wk) plus FOLFIRI q2w (irinotecan 180 mg/m2, folinic acid 400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5-FU infusion 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h) (Group A, n=599) or FOLFIRI alone (Group B, n=599). QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3.0) questionnaire. Pts were to complete the questionnaire at baseline, every 4 cycles, and at final tumor assessment. The primary QoL analysis focused on Global Health Status and Social Functioning scales and employed a pattern-mixture model that included the drop-out pattern. Descriptive statistics were provided for each multi-item scale considering QoL changes over time. Results: Risk of disease progression was significantly reduced by 15% (HR=0.85) in favor of Group A (p=0.0479); pts with KRAS wild-type (wt) tumors in Group A had a 32% (HR=0.68) reduced risk of progressing. Questionnaire completion compliance rates were similar between treatment groups. Pattern-mixture analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups for changes from baseline on the Global Health Status (p=0.29) and Social Functioning (p=0.39) scales. Comparing treatment groups in terms of QoL scores over time resulted in no statistically significant differences, apart from nausea/vomiting in favor of the cetuximab group at week 16 (10.2 vs 13.3; p=0.0129), week 32 (9.3 vs 12.5; p=0.0488) and week 40 (7.6 vs 12.5; p=0.0194). Conclusions: In pts with mCRC, cetuximab plus FOLFIRI first-line significantly prolongs PFS compared with FOLFIRI alone while preserving QoL. The PFS benefit is even more pronounced for pts with KRAS wt tumors. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning scale was expected to reflect skin reactions related to cetuximab, but there was neither a clinically meaningful nor statistically significant difference between groups. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4097-4097
Author(s):  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Junji Furuse ◽  
Lipika Goyal ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  

4097 Background: In FOENIX-CCA2 (NCT02052778), a pivotal phase 2 study among iCCA patients (pts) with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, the highly selective, irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor futibatinib demonstrated a confirmed objective response rate of 41.7%, with a 9.7-month median duration of response. Adverse events were manageable with dosing modifications that did not adversely impact on response. We report outcomes for the preplanned analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) during futibatinib treatment as a secondary objective of FOENIX-CCA2. Methods: Pts enrolled in FOENIX-CCA2 had locally advanced/metastatic unresectable iCCA with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, ≥1 prior line of therapy (including gemcitabine/cisplatin) and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts received oral futibatinib 20 mg continuous QD dosing per 21-day cycle. PRO measures included EORTC-QLQ-C30 (1 global health, 5 functional, 9 symptom scales), EQ-5D-3L, and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). PROs were collected at screening, cycles 2 and 4, every 3 cycles thereafter, and end of treatment. PRO data were evaluated up to cycle 13, the last visit before data were missing for >50% of the PRO population (PRO primary assessment time point). Results: 92/103 (89.3%) pts enrolled had PRO completion data at baseline and a minimum of 1 follow-up assessment (median age 58 y, 56.5% female), with 48 pts having PRO data at cycle 13. At baseline, mean (SD) EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status score was 70.1 (19.4) and EQ VAS score 71.7 (20.3). Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status scores were maintained from baseline to cycle 13, corresponding to 9.0 months on treatment, with no clinically meaningful (≥10-point) changes in individual functional measures (Table). EORTC QLQ-C30 scores across individual symptom measures were also stable from baseline through cycle 13; only constipation showed an average of 10.0-point worsening at only cycle 4. Mean EQ VAS scores were sustained from baseline to cycle 13 (mean change ranging -1.8 to +4.8 across cycles), with values maintained within the population norm range from across 20 countries. Conclusions: Quality of life data from the phase 2 FOENIX-CCA2 trial show that physical, cognitive and emotional functioning, and overall health status were maintained among pts with advanced iCCA receiving futibatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02052778. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9057-9057
Author(s):  
Alexander I. Spira ◽  
Frederick Hugh Wilson ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Christophe Dooms ◽  
Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro ◽  
...  

9057 Background: In the registrational phase 2 CodeBreaK 100 trial, sotorasib demonstrated a response rate of 37.1% with median duration of 10.0 months, a median progression-free survival of 6.8 months, and a tolerable safety profile in patients with pretreated KRAS p.G12C mutated NSCLC. Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. Here, we report PRO measures of health-related quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, and key lung cancer symptoms from this trial. Methods: Eligible patients had KRAS p.G12C mutated advanced NSCLC and received prior standard therapies. Sotorasib was given at an oral daily dose of 960 mg with 21-day treatment cycles until disease progression. Disease-related symptoms and health-related QoL were evaluated as exploratory endpoints on day 1 of each cycle from baseline to discontinuation, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module, EORTC QLQ-LC13. The single item, 5-point scale GP5, of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version was used to evaluate the impact of side effects. Predefined analyses included change from baseline using descriptive statistics and mixed model for repeated measures for global health status/QoL, physical functioning, and key lung cancer symptoms of cough, dyspnea and chest pain. Results: Of 126 patients enrolled, compliance rates for each of the questionnaires were high throughout the study ( > 70%). Data up to cycle 11 (where n > 20) are presented. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL and physical functioning were maintained over time (least-square mean changes ranged from -3.5 to 0.2 and 0.1 to 3.9, respectively). EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms of fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation were stable or improved. Similarly, key lung cancer-related symptoms, as measured by EORTC QLQ-LC13, remained stable or improved from baseline, with the greatest least-square mean change of -11.2 (95% Cl: -16.2, -6.1) for cough, -4.9 (95% Cl: -10.3, 0.4) for chest pain, and -3.4 (95% Cl: -7.8, 1.0) for dyspnea. Most patients reported on the GP5 that they were “not at all” (54.2%-79.2%) or “a little bit” (8.3%-33.3%) bothered by side effects from sotorasib, with 0%-7.4% reporting being bothered as “quite a bit” and 0% as “very much”. Conclusions: In patients from the single-arm phase 2 trial of sotorasib, PRO measures suggested maintenance or improvement of global health status/QoL, physical functioning, and the severity of key lung cancer-related symptoms, including cough, dyspnea, and chest pain. Self-reported side effect bother was minimal. These data, together with the encouraging efficacy and safety profiles, strongly support the use of sotorasib in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03600883.


2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 813-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek Miszczyk ◽  
Andrzej Tukiendorf ◽  
Aleksandra Gaborek ◽  
Jerzy Wydmański

Aims Evaluation of analgesic uptake, pain intensity, and quality-of-life changes after half-body irradiation of patients with bone metastases. Material and Methods Ninety-five patients (97 irradiations) were treated with single half-body irradiation fraction (3–8 Gy). Thirty-three patients had upper-half-body irradiation, 55 lower-half-body irradiation and 9 middle-half-body irradiation. The patients were examined on the day of irradiation, 2 and 4 weeks later, and then once a month. The intake of analgesics, pain level (from 0 to 10), and the quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were evaluated. The fluctuations of pain levels and the particular scaling values of QLQ-C30 during a one-year period were analyzed (Kendall t correlation). Results Over the course of 5 months, the incidence of patients using strong opioids decreased from 43.8% to 33.3%, and the incidence of patients who did not need to resort to analgesics increased from 6.7% to 25%. The mean pain level decreased from 6.1 points (half-body irradiation) to 3.1 points 2 weeks later. An inverse correlation between pain level readings and time was statistically significant. An increase was observed in the values of the five functional scales as reflected on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (four of which correlated significantly with the observation time). A similar situation prevailed with respect to global health status. A decrease was observed in most of the values on the symptoms scales; 6 saw a significant decrease, in correlation with the follow-up. Correlations were also found between pain intensity and functionality, and between symptoms scales readings and global health status. Conclusions Half-body irradiation of cancer patients suffering from painful multiple bone dissemination is an effective and simple treatment modality that affords significant quality-of-life improvement and pain relief, thus allowing for a reduction in the use of strong analgesics.


Author(s):  
Selda Çakın Ünnü ◽  
Ilkay Tugba Unek ◽  
Ömercan Topaloğlu

Objective: The self-administered questionnaires by the patients are among the most important methods to evaluate the patient’s health related quality of life. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on quality of life of the patients receiving palliative chemotherapy with the diagnosis of metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer by using EORTC QLQ-C30. Methods: This study included 100 patients who were treated with palliative chemotherapy for the diagnosis of metastatic gastric or colorectal cancer in İzmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology between 2011-2012. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was filled twice by the patients before chemoterapy started and after chemotherapy completed. Results: When the two questionnaires were compared, it was found that global health status and physical functioning did not change after the chemotherapy. Role functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning impaired but emotional functioning improved (p<0.05). After the chemoterapy, scores of fatigue and constipation decreased but financial difficulties increased (p<0.05). The symptom scores of nausea-vomitting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, diarrhea did not change. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that a quality of life assessment with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire would be beneficial in patients with metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer. In this way, impairments in functional scores, global health status and symptom scores that may occur after chemotherapy can be detected, clinicians can be helped to decide on the switch to chemotherapy regimens that are similar in effectiveness but have different side effects profile, the patients’ quality of life can be improved as a result of the application of the necessary palliative treatments.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3593-3593
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Frustaci ◽  
Michele Nichelatti ◽  
Marina Deodato ◽  
Maddalena Mazzucchelli ◽  
Marco Montillo ◽  
...  

Abstract The clinical course of WM widely differs among patients, with some manifesting symptoms as a consequence of the monoclonal IgM component or lymphoma infiltration. IgM-MGUS is generally asymptomatic while, in some cases, paraprotein-related manifestations may occur. Patients with IgM-MGUS should perform a regular follow-up as they are at risk of developing WM or other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (1.5-2% per year). Although WM typically afflicts the elderly, there are no studies addressing the impact of ECOG performance status and comorbidities on patients' outcome. Furthermore, to our knowledge health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has never been evaluated in this category. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of diagnosis and patients' characteristics on quality of life. From October 2017, HRQOL was assessed in 103 patients (37 WM with previous or ongoing treatment [tWM]; 29 asymptomatic MW [aWM]; 37 IgM-MGUS) by the administration of EORTC QLQ-C30, HADS, FACT-GOG neurotoxicity and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Demographic anamnestic and disease-related data were also collected for each patient. The same questionnaires continue to be administered every 6 months for 3 years, in order to capture changes in HRQOL over time. Patients features are reported in table 1. No significant differences in terms of age, sex distribution, age at diagnosis, months from diagnosis, ECOG performance status, CIRS or number of concomitant medications, were detected among the 3 groups (table 1). As regards CIRS, the organ systems mainly involved resulted: vascular and genitourinary for tWM, genitourinary for aWM and vascular, respiratory and genitourinary for IgM-MGUS. Among the 3 groups no statistical differences were reported when analyzing: EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning) and symptoms scale, EQ-5D VAS score, HADS anxiety and depression scores or FACT-GOG neurotoxicity score. Males had higher global health status and emotional function when compared to females both in IgM-MGUS and WM patients. Higher CIRS score and ECOG status negatively impacted on global health status, physical function, EQ-5D VAS score and anxiety both in WM and IgM-MGUS. WM patients with longer time from diagnosis showed a significantly worse emotional function. Patients-reported symptoms that could be referred to peripheral neuropathy (PN, 39 patients) resulted the only significant parameter negatively impacting on HRQOL (global health status, functional and symptoms scales according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D VAS score) and also affecting HADS anxiety score. The diagnosis of PN was confirmed by neurologic tests only in 16/39 subjects that, compared with the rest of the population, showed older age (p .019), older age at diagnosis (p . 015) and higher ECOG status (p .005). In these patients, EORTC QLQ-C30 detected a reduced cognitive function (p .0031), while HADS a greater perception of anxiety (p .0015). No differences were recorded for EQ-5D VAS score or HADS depression scale. In conclusion, in our series diagnosis per se didn't seem to affect HRQOL which was negatively influenced by high ECOG status and comorbidities. Emotional function meaningfully deteriorated as the time lapse from diagnosis became longer. Quality of life was significantly altered in patients reporting symptoms of PN and this was confirmed by all the questionnaires. Longer follow up is needed to confirm these preliminary data. Disclosures Montillo: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Tedeschi:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3770-3770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Brodsky ◽  
Petra Muus ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
Anita Hill ◽  
Monica Bessler ◽  
...  

Abstract Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired hemolytic anemia in which complement-sensitive RBCs are destroyed leading to chronic intravascular hemolysis. PNH patients suffer from diverse and serious hemolysis-induced morbidities leading to a poor quality of life (QoL). Fatigue in PNH patients may be disabling and levels are similar to anemic cancer patients. Fatigue is multifactoral, related to both the underlying anemia and hemolysis. Patients suffer from reduced global health status, patient functioning, pain and dyspnea. Treatment with the terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab reduces intravascular hemolysis and improves anemia. The impact of eculizumab treatment on levels of fatigue and other patient reported outcomes was prospectively examined in a double-blind placebo controlled study (TRIUMPH) using two distinct instruments, the FACIT-Fatigue and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Improvements in QoL were quantified using standardized effect sizes (SES), a measure of the magnitude of the clinical benefit in various instruments. Eculizumab treatment, as compared to placebo, was associated with a very large and significant improvement in fatigue as measured by the FACIT-Fatigue scale (SES=1.13, P<0.001) as well as the EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue subscale (SES=1.12, P<0.001). Similarly, the percentage of patients achieving a pre-specified minimally important difference (MID) was 53.7% versus 20.5% of eculizumab- and placebo-treated patients, respectively (P=0.003) using the FACIT-Fatigue; 67.7% versus 24.4%, respectively (P<0.001) with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Treatment independent univariate analyses showed that reduction in intravascular hemolysis (decreased LDH levels) and improvement in anemia (increased hemoglobin levels) were both significantly associated with an improvement in fatigue. Further, multivariate analyses indicated that reduction in hemolysis was more predictive than improvement in anemia of an improvement in fatigue. Eculizumab treatment was also associated with significant improvements with moderate to large SES in the following EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales: global health status (0.87, P<0.001); role functioning (0.93, P<0.001); social functioning (0.57, P=0.003); cognitive functioning (0.78, P=0.002); physical functioning (1.01, P<0.001); emotional functioning (0.51, P=0.008); pain (0.65, P=0.002); dyspnea (0.69, P<0.001); and appetite loss (0.50, P<0.001). These data demonstrate that resolution of intravascular hemolysis with eculizumab treatment results in large and clinically meaningful improvements in patient reported outcomes including fatigue, global health status, patient functioning, and disease-related symptoms in PNH.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2384-2384
Author(s):  
Dorte Tholstrup ◽  
Jesper Jurlander ◽  
Palle Bekker Jeppesen ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown

Abstract During the recent years CHOP-14 based chemotherapy in combination with the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab has become the standard choice of treatment for non-localized, poor risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). The German NHL-B1 and -B2 trials have demonstrated favourable efficacy and safety. We, and others, have observed a relatively high frequency of severe toxicity, infections and malnutrition in very high-risk patients, responsible for increased morbidity during treatment. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated QoL in patients treated with CHOP-14 based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether QoL was affected in DLBCL patients treated with dose-dense CHOP-based chemotherapy. Health-related QoL was assessed using the validated EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) questionaire, which is a 30-item instrument developed specifically for use in international clinical cancer research. 26 patients with DLBCL (22 (85%) de novo and 4 (15%) transformed follicular lymphoma) were included. Median age was 59 years (27–78), 18 (69%) had CS III/IV disease, 14 (54%) extranodal involvement, 19 (73%) elevated LDH, 10 (39%) a Performance Score ≥2, i.e. 13 (50%) presented with IPI 3–5 disease. Furthermore, 7 (27%) had bone marrow involvement, 13 (50%) bulky disease and 18 (69%) B-symptoms. All patients received 6 or 8 cycles of CHOP-14 based chemotherapy, and 17 of the patients received Rituximab at day 1 of each cycle. The patients completed the QLQ-C30 questionaire at four predefined timepoints according to chemotherapy treatment: pre-treatment, mid-treatment (14 days after the 4th cycle), 14 days post-treatment and 3 months post-treatment. Patient scores were compared to scores from an age- and gender-adjusted reference population, and separately analyzed over time (using non-parametric statistical analyzes). At pre-treatment only global health status (p=0.008) and role functioning (p=0.049) were impaired compared to the reference population. During treatment, global health status (p=0.008), physical functioning (p&lt;0.001) and role functioning (p=0.003) were significantly decreased, and fatigue (p&lt;0.001), dyspnoea (p=0.028) and appetite loss (p=0.007) significantly increased. All six scales were normalized three months posttreatment. At three months post-treatment the patients generally scored equal with the reference population, and in fact significantly higher in emotional and social functioning, and significantly lower in all symptom scales except fatigue. EORTC QLQ-C30 scores (treatment vs. pre-treatment) QoL-scales Pre-treatment Mid-treatment 14 days post-treatment 3 months post-treatment (N=26) (N=26) (N=23) (N=24) Mean Mean differences (95%CI) Global health status/QoL Global health status/QoL 60 −4 (−16;−8) −9 (−20;2) +10 (0;21) Functional scales Physical functioning 79 −12 (−22;−2) −17 (−28;−6) +1 (−8;9) Role functioning 63 −19 (−36;−2) −20 (−38;−3) +7 (−9;23) Emotional functioning 74 +7 (0;14) +10 (0;19) +16 (7;24) Cognitive functioning 85 −8 (−16;1) −1 (−10;8) −1 (−11;10) Social functioning 81 −3 (−13;−8) −3 (−14;8) +8 (−5;21) Symptom scales/items Fatigue 41 +15 (2;28) +14 (1;26) −12 (−27;6) Nausea and vomiting 6 +4 (−4;13) −1 (−9;6) −6 (−14;1) Pain 19 −1 (−12;10) +1 (−8;11) −4 (−19;11) Dyspnoea 24 +8 (−6;21) +3 (−12;18) −11 (−26;4) Insomnia 31 −4 (−18;11) −12 (−25;2) −13 (−27;2) Appetite loss 24 +6 (−10;23) +10 (−11;31) −17 (−33;−1) Constipation 12 +4 (−11;18) −4 (−17;8) −10 (−19;0) Diarrhoea 5 +14 (3;25) +13 (3;23) +8 (−1;18) Financial difficulties 9 +3 (−7;12) +3 (−7;13) +1 (−13;15) Our study indicates, that disease-related symptoms are infrequent in these poor-risk DLBCL patients (according to pre-treatment scores), and that treatment-related symptoms are short-lived. QoL is affected during CHOP-14 based chemotherapy, but only temporarily. The treatment regimen is therefore applicable and safe with regard to QoL in this setting.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8583-8583
Author(s):  
Kevin W. Song ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
...  

8583 Background: Poor prognosis and therapy exhaustion have been associated with reduced QOL in RRMM. In MM-003, a randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial, POM + LoDEX (n = 302) significantly improved progression-free and overall survival vs. high-dose dexamethasone (HiDEX; n = 153) in pts who failed lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) and progressed on their last therapy. This analysis evaluated QOL changes in these pts. Methods: To assess pt-reported outcomes, cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were performed. Minimal important differences for 5 clinically relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (Global Health Status, Physical Functioning, Fatigue, Emotional Functioning, and Pain) were calculated as meaningful change thresholds (1 standard error of measurement) from baseline through cycle (C) 5. Time to QOL worsening was compared between arms using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Favorable trends were observed for POM + LoDEX vs. HiDEX in each of the 5 relevant domains. The cross-sectional analysis indicated statistically or marginally significant (P < .10) differences favoring POM + LoDEX in Global Health Status (C2, 4), Physical Function (C2, 3, 4), Emotional Function (C2, 3, 4), and Fatigue (C2) scores. Longitudinal comparisons between arms confirmed the significance of score changes for Global Health Status (C2; P = .01), Physical Functioning (C3 and 4; P = .018 and .028, respectively), Emotional Functioning (C3; P = .018), and Fatigue (C5; P = .008) for POM + LoDEX vs. HiDEX. HiDEX pts exhibited clinically meaningful worsening in Global Health Status and Physical Functioning scores vs. POM + LoDEX by C2 (P = .04) and C3 (P = .02), respectively. POM + LoDEX extended median time to meaningful worsening vs. HiDEX for Global Health Status (114 vs. 85 days, P = .05), Physical Functioning (174 vs. 106 days; P = .09), Fatigue (113 vs. 60 days; P = .02), Emotional Functioning (190 vs. 124 days; P = .04), and Pain (147 vs. 113 days; P = .2). Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts who failed LEN and BORT, POM + LoDEX resulted in better clinical outcomes as well as improvement in clinically relevant QOL measurements over the course of treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT01311687.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11501-11501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Clemons ◽  
Michael Ong ◽  
Carol Stober ◽  
D. Scott Ernst ◽  
Christopher M. Booth ◽  
...  

11501 Background: Defining the optimal dosing interval of commonly used bone-targeted agents (BTAs), such as denosumab and bisphosphonates, for patients with bone metastases remains an important clinical question. We performed a pragmatic randomised trial comparing the non-inferiority of 12- versus 4-weekly BTAs in patients with bone metastases from breast and prostate cancer. Methods: Patients with bone metastases, who were either BTA-naïve, or already receiving, denosumab, pamidronate or zoledronate were eligible. They were randomised to receive their chosen BTA every 12- or 4-weeks for one year. The primary endpoint was Health related quality of life (HRQL) (EORTC-QLQ-C30 Functional Domain - Physical Subdomain). Secondary endpoints included: pain (EORTC-QLQ-BM22 - pain domain), Global Health Status (EORTC-QLQ-C30), symptomatic skeletal events (SSE) rates and time to SSEs. Adverse events and toxicity profiles were also compared. Results: Of 263 patients (60.8% breast and 39.2% prostate), 130 (49.4%) were randomised to 12-weekly and 133 (50.6%) to 4-weekly therapy. 138 (52.5%) were bone-agent naïve. The BTAs included; denosumab (n=148, 56.3%), zoledronate (n=63, 24.0%) and pamidronate (n=52, 19.8%). Study-reported outcomes showed no significant difference in; HRQL-physical domain (median [range]: 0 [-86, 40] vs. 0 [-66, 53.3]), pain (median [range]: 0 [-66, 72] vs. 0 [-100, 88]), Global Health Status (median [range]: 0 [-100, 66.7] vs. 0 [-83, 33.3]), SSE rates (N [%]: 24 [18.5%] vs. 22 [16.5%]), 1-year SSE-free rate (median, range; 73.2% [63.6, 80.7] vs. 77.9% [69.1, 84.4]) between the 12- and 4-weekly arms, respectively. Subgroup analyses for BTA naïve and pre-treated patients, and for patients receiving denosumab, zoledronate and pamidronate, showed no significant difference between the 12- and 4-weekly arms. There was no significant difference in reported rates of renal impairment (2.3% vs. 3.0%), symptomatic hypocalcaemia (1.5% vs. 1.5%) or osteonecrosis of the jaw (0.8% vs. 0.8%). Conclusion: The findings of this trial are consistent with those previously reported for de-escalating zoledronate. This trial also included patients receiving de-escalated denosumab and pamidronate. While the results of the Swiss REDUSE trial are awaited, the data presented would suggest that de-escalation of all commonly used BTAs is a reasonable treatment option. Clinical trial information: NCT02721433.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document