AML in Israel: Younger Age at Diagnosis Does Not Improve Prognosis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4130-4130
Author(s):  
Neta Goldschmidt ◽  
Sarah Cohen ◽  
Deborah Rund
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Abstract 4130 Introduction AML is generally considered a disease of the elderly, with a mean age of diagnosis in the Western world is approximately 60 years of age or older. Important prognostic parameters include: age, karyotype and new molecular markers (NPM1 and FLT3). Treatment in a tertiary care facility also may improve survival. We elected to examine these parameters and the long term outcome of AML patients (pts) treated in our institution which is an academic tertiary care center, among the largest in Israel. Methods We reviewed clinical data on pts with AML (de novo and secondary) treated at Hadassah in the years 1992-2009. Karyotype was determined by conventional cytogenetics and FISH analysis or molecular analysis when appropriate. Good prognosis karyotype was considered to include t(8;21), t(15;17) and inv16. FLT3 ITD (internal tandem duplications) and NPM1 analysis was determined on all pts for whom DNA was available, using PCR and either acrylamide gel electrophoresis (FLT3) or melting point analysis (NPM1). Kaplan Meier analysis determined duration of survival. Statistical significance was determined using Log rank and Chi square test, with significance set at a level of p<0.01. Results 293 patients were included, of which 236 (80%) had de novo AML and 57 (19.5%) had secondary AML, either following an antecedent hematological disease (AHD) such as MDS (n= 32, 11%) or therapy related AML (t-AML) (n=25, 8.5%). Our standard protocol for AML includes 7+3 induction and high dose Ara-C consolidations. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT), either allogeneic or autologous, is performed in high risk cases depending on donor availability. The mean age at diagnosis of the 293 pts was relatively young (all pts= 47.7±18.3 yrs; de novo AML= 45.6±17.6 yrs; secondary AML= 56.2±18.6 yrs; t-AML= 48.6±16.6 yrs). Mean age at diagnosis for Arab pts was 44.2±16.7, as compared to Jewish pts (49.4±18.6). For de novo AML Arab pts, mean age at diagnosis was 43.3±16.4 as compared to de novo Jewish pts (46.9±18). The male to female ratio was 60/29 (2.06) for Arab pts and 99/102 (0.97) for Jewish pts, 53/25 (2.12) and 80/78 (1.02) for de novo Arab and Jewish pts respectively. In the de-novo AML group, 58 (24%) had a good prognosis karyotype. In the entire group of pts, 108 (37%) had normal karyotype and 62 (21%) had FLT3 ITD. Of the 108 normal karyotype pts, 34 (31%) were found to have FLT3 ITD, and 17 (16%) were found to harbor NPM1 mutations; of the NPM1 positive patients, 12 (70%) were FLT3 ITD negative. Treatment with intention to cure was administered to 218 (92%) of the de novo AML and 36 (63%) of the secondary AML pts. Other pts received best supportive care. Eighty six (29%) pts underwent allogeneic BMT and 12 (4%) underwent autologous BMT. The 5 year survival was 35% and the 10 year survival was 17% with no difference between Arabs and Jews. Good prognosis karyotype significantly improved survival as did younger age, and absence of FLT3 ITD. Conclusions We conclude that in our institution, the median age of diagnosis of AML is more than two decades younger than that reported in literature. The reason for this may be demographic or related to environmental exposures such as smoking. The preponderance of male Arab pts is most likely due referral bias. The young age of the Arab male pts may be due to occupational or environmental exposures, such as smoking. Our treatment protocols and supportive care are similar to those used in Western countries. Despite these factors, survival was not as good as might be expected according to age, karyotype and FLT3 ITD status. Further studies are needed to elucidate the etiology of these findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Interim Anaiysis of Intention To Treat Analysis, “Multicenter AML-2000 Trial” Based on Cytogenetics Risk Factors.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4618-4618
Author(s):  
Yeung-Chul Mun ◽  
S.M. Lee ◽  
S.M. Bang ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
E.K. Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Prognostic Groups ◽  
Prognosis Group ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Treat Analysis

Abstract The result of cytogenetics is one of the most important prognostic factors on the prognosis of AML. HDAC, auto PBPCT and allogeneic BMT after 1 or 2 times of post remission therapy based on 4 prognostic groups(APL: Acute promyelocytic leukemia, GPG: Good prognosis group, IPG: Intermediate prognosis group, PPG: Poor prognosis group by MRC definition) were underwent based on cytogenetics data. We studied CR, relapse, toxic death, DFS and OS. Inclusion criteria were age<65, PS<3 with reasonable organ functions in de novo AML, secondary AML and RAEB-T. The aims of this prospective intention to treat analysis was to compare the CR, recovery kinetics, DFS and OS by giving different therapies of intensity in the different prognostic groups based on cytogentics data. Three plus seven(Idarubicin 12mg/m2(D1–D3), Ara-C 100mg/m2(D1–D7)) were given to de novo AML, secondary AML and RAEB-T. Intermediate dose(8gm/m2) of Ara-C was given followed by HDAC or auto PBPCT to the patients with GPG(t(8:21) & inv(16)). Three times of post remission therapy including HDAC, or auto PBPCT were given to the patients with IPG or PPG(−5, −7, del 5q, complex). If HLA-identical sibling was available, then allo BMT was underwent after 1st post-remission therapy. In cases of APL, three times of post-remission therapy with idarubicin alone were given. ATRA was given to APL group during remission induction therapy and after post-remission maintenance period for 2 years. Up to Mar., 2005, 422 patients(18 centers) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 48months. Among them, 92.3% was de novo AML, and APL, GPG, IPG and PPG were 10.0%, 21.6%, 51.4%, and 14.7% respectively. Overall CR after 1st induction(3+7) were 69.9%(APL: 87.2%, GPG: 84.7%, IPG: 63.8%, PPG: 55.66%, P<0.01). Relapse rate was 12.8%(APL), 40.5%(GPG), 40.5%(IPG) and 45.6%(PPG) respectively(P<0.01). Toxicities profiles including mucositis, hepatic, cardiac and bleeding episodes were similar on 3 different therapy modalities(HDAC, auto PBPCT and allo BMT). In conclusions, this trial seems to be tolerable in terms of toxicities after induction and during post remission therapies. Among GPG, there were no significant statistical differences on OS and LFS in all the therapy modalities(ie, HDAC, Auto, Allo). In IPG, auto arm had a tendency of superior OS and LFS comparing to HDA & allo arm. In PPG, there was significant surperior LFS in allo arm. There were no statistical differences on OS in all the therapy modalities in PPG. This intention to treattrial, which had started in Jan, 2000, has been going on until now. Through this risk based trial using cytogenetics, we might be able to find optimal post-remission therapies for different risk groups with less toxicities.

Bortezomib+Chemotherapy Based Salvage Combinations in Refractory AML, Preliminary Results

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4000-4000
Author(s):  
Miklos Udvardy ◽  
Attila Kiss ◽  
Bela Telek ◽  
Robert Szasz ◽  
Peter Batar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Bortezomib (Velcade) proved to be the standard element of refractory myeloma 2nd and 3rd line treatment, while many studies are suggesting excellent results in 1st line. Proteasome inhibition, the block of angiogenesis, modification of the NF-kappa-B system seems to be a challenging target in other malignant diseases, including refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well. In vitro data clearly support, that bortezomib exerts antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in different AML cell-lines, along with human AML cell cultures, and moreover bortezomib was able to restore, or at least improve anthracyclin and possibly ARA-C sensitivity in different cell-lines (including AML). More recently, a Phase I trial showed bortezomib monotherapy efficient (only in few percents) in childhood refractory acute leukemia. Some case reports were shown at ASH 2007. We have tried bortezomib containing first or second line combinations in 27 (14 female, 13 male, mean age 57.6 years) patients with refractory or poor risk AML, in a small retrospective survey. The combinations were as follows: HAM or Flag-Ida, combined with bortezomib 1,3 mg pro sqm, day O and seven). The following groups were considered as refractory or poor risk AML: De novo AML, 2nd line: No response/remission to first line standard treatment (“3+7”), n=2 (Velcade- Flag-Ida treatment) De novo AML 1st line: bilineal or biphenotypic (flow-cytometry) n=2 (Velcade-Flag- Ida treatment) De novo AML with complex (numerical or more than 3 abnormalities) karyotype or normal karyotype with flt-3 TKD mutation, n=9, 1st line (Velcade-Flag-Ida n=6, Velcade- HAM protocol, n=3) Secondary AML or AML with evidence of previous more than 6 mo duration high grade MDS, n=14, 1st line: (Velcade-Flag-Ida n=9, Velcade-HAM n=5) RESULTS: Complete remission (CR) 12/27, partial remission (PR) 9/27, no remission 5/27, progression during treatment: 1/27.Best responses were seen in de novo cases. CR had been achieved in all patients of group 1 (two standard risk patients not responding to 3+7 protocol), and group 2 (biphenotypic, bilineal). The CR rate was quite appreciable in group 3, i.e. 6/9 (complex karyotype or normal karyotype with FLt-3 mutation – the response rate was excellent with flt-3 mutated cases). In group 4. (MDS, secondary AML) the results were less impressive. There were no major differences according to protocol (Flag-Ida or HAM) Allogeneous stem cell transplantation could have been performed in 1st CR in two patients (one from group 1. and another from group 2.). One of them died due to relapse, the other one is in CR since then. The combinations seem to be relatively safe. Induction related death rate was low (1 elderly patient acute thrombocytopenic bleeding with refractory MDS-AML). 5 other patients had severe neutropenic sepsis (2 with fatal outcome). Pulmonary syndrome, which may follow Velcade+ARA-C had not been documented. Other adverse events did not differ from the pattern observed with standard induction therapies.

scholarly journals De Novo and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Real World Data on Outcomes from the French Nord-Pas-De-Calais Picardie Acute Myeloid Leukemia Observatory

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4013-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loïc Renaud ◽  
Olivier Nibourel ◽  
Celine Berthon ◽  
Christophe Roumier ◽  
Céline Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Real World ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background. Population-based registries may provide data complementary to that from clinical intervention studies. Registries with high coverage of the target population reduce the impact of selection on outcome and the subsequent problem with extrapolating data to nonstudied populations like secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Actually, secondary AML are frequently excluded from clinical trials so the registries constitute the only way to fine data for establishing recommendations for the management of these patients in the real world. Method. The French Nord-pas-de-calais Picardie AML observatory containing 1 582 AML patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. We compared 974 primary AML to 514 Secondary AML include AML arising from a pre-existing myelodysplastic (n=211), myeloproliferative (n=88) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (n=57) disease and therapy related AML (t-AML) (n=158). Results. Median survival and 5 years overall survival were respectively 420 days [95%IC: 349-491] and 32% for patients with de novo AML; 157 days [95%IC: 118-196] and 7% for patients with secondary AML. 1101 patients were classified according to the MRC as favorable, intermediate and unfavorable, respectively 18(5.2%), 178(51.9%) and 147(42.9%) patients with secondary AML including 100(29.2%) complexes karyotypes and 117(15.4%), 468(61.7%) and 173(22.8%) patients with de novo AML including 121 (15.9%) complexes karyotypes. 987 patients were classified according to the ELN as favorable, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and unfavorable for respectively 35(11.7%), 53(17.7%), 67(22.%) and 144(48.2%) patients with secondary AML and 219(31.8%), 167(24.%), 136(19.8%) and 166(24.1%) patients with de novo AML. The age at diagnosis was significantly different (p < 10-3) with a median of 72.6 years for secondary AML and 63.2 for de novo AML. 206 (40.4%) patients with secondary AML received demethylating agents versus 184 (19%) for de novo AML and 152(29%) received high dose chemotherapy (HDC) versus 619 (63.9%) patients with de novo AML. Best supportive care was the only treatment for 170 (17.5%) de novo AML and 164 (31.9%) secondary AML patients. For patients over than 60 years old, median survival and 5 years overall survival were respectively 182 days [95%IC: 136.5-127.4] and 12.9% for 559 patients with de novo AML; 128 days [95%IC: 95.0-161.0] and <4% for 413 patients with secondary AML. Conclusion. The poor prognosis of secondary and t- AML is confirmed by this registry study. Possible explanations for this worse outcome could be older age at diagnosis and increased frequency of complex karyotypes which lead to less intensive therapy or supportive care only. In this specific population, the choice of demethylating agent therapy was frequently made because of the weak efficacy of HDC and increased frequency of side effects in this vulnerable group. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Frequent Mutation of the Polycomb-Associated Gene ASXL1 In Acute Myeloid Leukemia Secondary to Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2940-2940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Fernandez-Mercado ◽  
Andrea Pellagatti ◽  
Janet Perry ◽  
Cristina Fernandez-Santamaria ◽  
Maria J. Calasanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Mutation Rate ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Common Mutation ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Frequent Event ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Abstract 2940 Recent studies have identified mutations of the ASXL1 gene in MDS and CMML. Mammalian ASXL proteins are believed to play a role in chromatin remodelling. We have previously reported that ASXL1 mutations are frequent in patients with MDS, CMML and AML. We observed that the mutation rate was relatively high in late MDS and AML with a lower frequency across early MDS. We found that the mutation is common in the normal karyotype group (especially AML secondary to MDS), occurring in 40% of all cases. ASXL1 mutations (including the common mutation c.1934dupG;p.Gly646TrpfsX12) were present in myeloid cells, but not in T-cells, indicating that they were acquired in all seven cases examined. The majority of the mutations identified were heterozygous frameshift mutations caused by deletion or duplication of a nucleotide. Given the high frequency of ASXL1 mutations in advanced MDS and AML in our earlier study, we have now screened a larger group of 143 AML samples, comprising 111 de novo AML and 32 AML secondary to either MDS or CMML, for mutations in the ASXL1 gene. In primary AML samples we found only 6/111 patients with ASXL1 mutations (5%), whereas the frequency of mutations was significantly higher in AML secondary to MDS (10/25, 40%) or CMML (5/7, 71%), strongly suggesting an association with disease progression in MDS and CMML. In order to determine the frequency of ASXL1 mutations in de novo and secondary AML patients with a normal karyotype and to identify cooperating mutations, we screened 85 samples for ASXL1 (all coding exons), NPM1 (exon 12), FLT3 (ITD and D835Y), TET2 (all coding exons), IDH1 (R132), IDH2 (R140 and R172) and RUNX1 (exons 3–7) mutations (Table 1). FLT3 and NPM1 mutations were more common in de novo AML (FLT3 51% and NPM1 58%) than in sAML (FLT3 9% and NPM1 12%), consistent with the role of NPM1 mutations as a hallmark of cytogenetically normal de novo AML. TET2 was mutated in 13% of primary AML, and in 28% of sAML, with most TET2 mutations found in AML secondary to CMML (5/7, 71%), as expected according to previous reports on higher mutation frequency in CMML patients. Mutations in IDH1 and in IDH2 were evenly distributed in primary and secondary cases. Similarly, RUNX1 mutation rate showed no significant differences between primary and secondary AML cases. Interestingly, ASXL1 mutations were mutually exclusive with NPM1 mutations, suggesting that they could be markers of different subgroups with a distinct aetiology. In conclusion, we have shown that mutation of ASXL1 is a very frequent event in AML secondary to MDS and CMML, but is much less frequent in de novo AML. Our data support a role for ASXL1 mutations in disease progression in MDS and CMML. Table 1. Mutation rate for genes screened in AML samples Primary AML Secondary AML From MDS From CMML ASXL1 5/53ü(9.4%) 10/25ü(40%) 5/7ü(71.4%) NPM1 31/53ü(58.5%) 3/25ü(12%) 1/7ü(14.3%) FLT3 26/51ü(51%) 3/25ü(12%) 0/7 TET2 7/52ü(13.5%) 4/25ü(16%) 5/7ü(71.4%) IDH1 7/52ü(13%) 3/25ü(12%) 0/7 IDH2 7/52ü(13%) 2/25ü(8%) 1/7ü(14.3%) RUNX1 6/53ü(11.3%) 4/25ü(16%) 1/7ü(14.3%) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High Frequency of AML1/RUNX1 Mutations in Specific Cytogenetic Subgroups in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 986-986
Author(s):  
Frank Dicker ◽  
Claudia Haferlach ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Susanne Schnittger
Keyword(s):  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Complex Karyotype ◽  
Trisomy 8 ◽  
Cytogenetic Aberrations ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Somatic mutations in the DNA-binding domain, the socalled Runt homology domain, of the AML1/RUNX1 gene have been identified to occur in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with the highest incidence in AML M0, in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS), in therapy-related AML (t-AML) and AML after MDS (s-AML). Cytogenetic aberrations that are associated with RUNX1 mutations (RUNX1mut) have been reported to be trisomy 13 in AML and trisomy 21 in myeloid malignancies, but also loss of chromosome 7q, mainly in t-MDS but rarely in t-AML. So far the majority of RUNX1mut have been described in secondary or therapy-related cases. Thus, we characterized a cohort of 119 patients (pts) with de novo AML and compared these results to 19 MDS and s-AML, 2 t-MDS (n=2) and 8 t-AML. The cohort was selected for specific cytogenetics with high reported frequencies of RUNX1mut: trisomy 13 (n=17), trisomy 21 (n=9), −7/7q- (n=34). In addition pts with normal karyotype (NK) (n=42), inv(3)/t(3;3) (n=12), trisomy 8 (n=11), complex karyotype (n=13) and 10 pts with various other cytogenetic aberrations (other) were analyzed. The incidence of RUNX1mut in the different cytogenetic subgroups was: 94% (16/17) in +13, 56% (5/9) in +21, 29% (10/34) in −7/7q-, 10% (4/42) in NK, 17% (2/12) in inv(3)/t(3;3), 18% (2/11) in +8, 0% (0/13) in complex karyotype and 20% (2/10) in other, respectively. Based on clinical history we observed RUNX1 mutations in: 6/19 (32%) in MDS/s-AML, 1/10 (10%) in t-MDS/t-AML and 34/119 (29%) in de novo AML. Of the 6 RUNXmut cases with MDS/s-AML the karyotypes were heterogeneous NK (n=1), −7 (n=2) +13 (n=1), +21 (n=1), and inv(3) (n=1). The only recurrent cytogenetic aberration in MDS/s-AML was −7, thus the frequency of RUNXmut in the MDS/s-AML group with −7 was 2/8 (25%). Also the only RUNX1mut case with t-AML revealed a −7. These data correspond to those reported in the literature. We further focussed on the analyses of RUNX1 in de novo AML which is rarely reported so far. In the de novo AML group only we detected RUNX1mut with the highest frequency in +13 (16/16; 100%) followed by +21 (4/8; 50%) −7 (7/21; 33%), + 8 (2/10, 20%), inv(3) (1/8; 12.5%), and NK (3/33; 9.1%). In addition, in the group with “other” aberration 2/8 were mutated. Interestingly, these 2 mutated cases displayed a high number of trisomies including +8 and +13. No RUNX1mut were detected in AML with complex karyotype (n=10). These data for the first time show that RUNX1mut are not strongly correlated to MDS, s-AML or t-AML. With almost the same frequency they can be observed in de novo AML if specific cytogenetic groups are considered. Thus the RUNXmut seem to be more related to these cytogenetic subgroups than to the MDS, s-AML or t-AML.

A Retrospective Comparison of Matched Elderly Patients Treated with Laromustine (Cloretazine®) or Best Supportive Care or Low Dose Ara-C in the LRF AML14 Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2960-2960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hills ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Verena Karsten ◽  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
Francis Giles
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Background : A substantial proportion of older patients with AML are considered unlikely to benefit from an intensive treatment approach. They often receive either best supportive care (BSC), low dose treatment such as Low Dose Ara-C (LDAC), or clinical trials of novel agents. In one of the few randomised studies where patients were prospectively considered likely to be unfit for intensive therapy, LDAC was superior to BSC with 18% v 1% patients achieving CR. No patients with high risk cytogenetics (Grimwade 1998), achieved CR (Burnett 2007). Laromustine (Cloretazine®) is a novel sulfonylhydrazine alkylating agent which preferentially targets the O6 position of guanine resulting in DNA cross-links. Laromustine has previously shown clinical activity in patients with de novo AML and high risk MDS (Giles et al. JCO 2007). A confirmatory phase II study of single agent laromustine was conducted in previously untreated patients ≥ 60 years old with de novo AML, prospectively considered likely to be unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Patients had at least one poor risk factor, defined by age ≥70, performance status 2, unfavorable cytogenetics, or cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic dysfunction. Eighty-five patients received induction therapy with 600 mg/m2 laromustine. Second induction cycles were administered in 14 patients after partial response or hematologic improvement. Eighteen patients received at least one consolidation cycle of cytarabine 400 mg/m2/day CIV for 5 days. Methods: A retrospective non-randomised comparison was performed between the 85 patients treated with laromustine, and 121 patients satisfying the same entry criteria, treated in the AML 14 trial with either BSC or LDAC. Outcomes were compared using Mantel-Haenszel and logrank methods for unadjusted comparisons, and regression methods for adjusted analyses. Results : Patients in AML14 were slightly older than those treated with laromustine (median age 75 v 73), and tended to have higher white blood cell counts; by contrast, there were significantly fewer cardiac or respiratory comorbidities reported in the AML14 population. Other important risk factors such as performance status and cytogenetics were similar between the groups. Responses overall (CR/CRp) were seen in 33% (28/85) of patients treated with laromustine, compared with 2% (1/60) and 23% (14/61) in patients treated with BSC and LDAC (p&lt;0.0001, p=0.2, respectively). In particular, 1 patient with −5/del(5q), and 3 patients with −7/del(7q) cytogenetics experienced a CR with laromustine; patients in AML 14 with adverse cytogenetics saw no remissions. Survival was significantly improved in the laromustine group compared to BSC (1 year survival 20% v 8%, unadjusted HR 0.58 [0.40–0.84] p=0.004), and roughly comparable to that of LDAC (1 year survival 20% v 25%, HR 1.04 [0.73–1.49] p=0.8). Analyses adjusted for differences in baseline demographics, and using propensity scores gave consistent figures. Conclusions: Retrospective comparison of unrandomised data has significant limitations even though care has been taken to match for factors known to be predictive for survival. Laromustine was able to achieve a higher CR rate than LDAC or BSC, and produced remissions in groups where no remissions have previously been seen with LDAC or BSC. Laromustine gave significantly better survival than BSC, and demonstrated similar survival to LDAC.

Epigenetic Therapy with 5-Azacitidine, Valproic Acid, and ATRA in Patients with High-Risk AML or MDS: Results of the French VIVEDEP Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 763-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
Adrienne de Labarthe ◽  
Audrey Cras ◽  
Christian Recher ◽  
Pascal Turlure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Epigenetic Therapy ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Introduction: Promising results have been reported last year with a combination of 5-azacitidine (AZA), valproic acid (VPA), and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in patients with AML/MDS treated at MDACC in a Phase I/II study (Soriano et al. Blood 2007). We report here on a similar study conducted in 9 centers between 7/2006 and 8/2007. Methods: Patients with high-risk AML (AML in patients aged 70y+ unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy or early relapsing/refractory AML) or MDS (int-2/high IPSS without possibility of allogeneic SCT) were eligible. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles with AZA 75 mg/m2/d SC (d1-7), VPA 35 to 50 mg/kg/d PO (d1-7), and ATRA 45 mg/m2/d PO (d8-28). Cycle 1 was initiated at the hospital but cycles 2–6 were planned monthly in out-patients. Response was assessed after cycle 1, 3, and 6 (IWG AML criteria). VPA was started at 35 mg/kg/d and then increased at 50 mg/kg/d if well tolerated. Sixty-three patients were enrolled and 51 are evaluable. Results: Patients characteristics were: M/F, 27/24; median age, 73y (50–87); median WBC, 2.3 × 109/L; PS 0-1/2, 45/6 patients; median follow-up, 13 months. Forty-two patients had AML (31 de novo, 9 therapy-related, 2 post-MDS/MPD) and 9 had MDS. Only 6 patients had received prior intensive therapy. Cytogenetics was available in 46 patients with high-risk features in 26 of them (complex, -7). Twenty-nine patients stopped the treatment after 1–5 cycles: 13 due to disease progression, 11 due to toxic events (mostly infection), and 5 due to physician decision despite stable disease. VPA was associated with notable CNS toxicity at 50 mg/kg, but not at the 35 mg/kg dose level. ATRA-related symptoms (headaches, mucosal dryness) were noted. In the 22 patients who received the 6 cycles, re-hospitalization rate was 27, 41, 23, 18, 20, and 14% after cycle 1 to 6, respectively. Among these patients, 11 reached CR (6 after cycle 3) and 5 reached PR (4 after cycle 3). The CR/PR rate was thus 31%, reaching 35% in the 46 patients who did not interrupt the treatment in the absence of progression or toxic event. Table 1 gives CR/PR rate according to various patient subsets. In patients with de novo AML, CR/PR rate was 45%. Advanced age and high-risk cytogenetics did not influence the response rate. In multivariate analysis, cytogenetics but not age remained, however, a poor risk factor for OS (PS, WBC, and MDS/secondary AML being other significant factors). Ten of the 16 responders relapsed after a median response duration of 10.6 months. Median OS was 12 months (not reached in the responders). Results of sequential DNA methylation and gene expression profiles monitoring (#17 patients) will be presented. Conclusion: This study confirms that epigenetic therapy with AZA, VPA, and ATRA yields a 35% response rate in patients with high-risk AML/MDS. Although randomized studies are needed (AZA ± HDAC inhibitors), this combined approach appears to be a good option to treat older patients with low WBC and favorable PS, whatever their cytogenetics. Maintenance options should be investigated in responding patients. Table 1 CR/PR No CR/PR P values Age < 75y 7 (27%) 19 Age ≥ 75y 9 (45%) 11 0.23 Standard-risk cytogenetics 8 (44%) 10 High-risk cytogenetics 7 (29%) 17 0.35 De novo AML 13 (45%) 16 MDS/secondary AML 3 (18%) 14 0.11 PS 0-1 16 (40%) 24 PS 2 0 (0%) 6 0.08 WBC < 5.109/L 15 (43%) 20 WBC ≥ 5.109/L 1 (9%) 10 0.07

NPM1 Mutations Have a High Impact On the Development of Secondary AML.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 999-999
Author(s):  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
Tamara Weiss ◽  
Frank Dicker ◽  
Jana Sundermann ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Nras Mutation ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Second Hit ◽  
Total Cohort ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Abstract 999 Poster Board I-21 NPM1 mutations are frequently reported to be typical for de novo AML and are regarded as prognostically favorable if not associated with FLT3-ITD. These mutations have rarely been reported in secondary AML after myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or after myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). We have detected NPM1 mutations in 37/283 patients with AML after a previous MDS (s-AML) (13.1%) and in 6/67 after a previous MPN (9%). Here we describe the characteristics of these 43 NPM1 mutated s-AML cases to show the involvement of NPM1 mutations in development of secondary AML. The total cohort of 43 cases was composed of 22 males and 21 females with a median age of 71.3 years (range: 29.3-87.7 years). Cytogenetics was available in 40 of the 43 cases (93%). 27 of these had a normal karyotpye whereas 13 revealed one of these aberrations: +4 (n=3), t(1;14)(p34;q32) (n=1); -7 (n=1), del(9q) (n=2), +13 (n=1); +21 (n=1), -Y (n=1); i(X)(p10) (n=1), [+1,der(1;13)(q10;q10),+i(5)(p10),+8] (n=1) and a t(5;12)(q33;p13) (n=1). All 43 samples were analysed for MLL-PTD, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, NRAS, CEBPA, RUNX1 mutations as well as for KITD816 and JAK2V617F mutations. The incidence of additional cooperating mutations was similar to de novo AML. FLT3-ITD was detected in 14/37 AML after MDS (37.8%) and only once (1/6) after MPN. FLT3-TKD was observed in 3/37 case after MDS (8.1%) and never after MPN. In addition there was one case with RUNX1 and 4 cases (10.8%) with NRAS mutation after MDS. In none of the cases a CEBPA mutation or MLL-PTD was observed. Thus a total of 18/37 cases (48.8%) after MDS revealed a further molecular mutation in addition to NPM1. Of those without additional molecular mutations (only NPM1) 4 cases revealed cytogenetic aberrations resulting in 22/37 cases (59.5%) with additional cytogenetic or molecular mutations. Also in the 6 cases with NPM1 after MPN we detected a high proportion of additional mutations. Two of these 6 cases defined to be after MPN had a history of KITD816V mutated mastocytosis. Two further cases had preceding JAK2V617F mutated MPN and one additional carried an ETV6-PDGFRB rearrangement. In all these 5 transformed MPN cases the initial typical MPN mutation was retained in AML (blast crisis) whereas the NPM1 mutation was acquired and may have served as a second hit in the development to AML. One of the two JAK2+/NPM1+ cases in addition also acquired an FLT3-ITD. From 11 of the s-AML cases a paired sample from the timepoint of MDS was available. Retrospectively the NPM1 mutations was retraced by mutation specific realtime PCR and also all other markers were analysed. Three different patterns were observed: 1) in two cases the NPM1 mutation was not detectable in MDS (analysed 35 and 11 months before diagnosis of s-AML). In one case an NPM1/ABL1 level of 1.6% was detectable 6 months after diagnosis of MDS and a level of 2129% eleven months after diagnosis of MDS. 2) In six cases the NPM1 mutation was not detectable with standard methods in MDS, but with sensitive Real time PCR a ratio of 1-4 log below the s-AML level was already detectable 6-17 months before onset of s-AML. 3) In three further cases a high NPM1 level comparable to that in s-AML was already detectable in MDS 2-12 months before s-AML evolved. These three cases gained an FLT3-ITD at the time point of transformation from MDS to AML. These pattern show that NPM1 can be an early or a late event in transformation to s-AML and although the acquisition of mutations seems to be important in the transformation to AML the sequence of the single events seem to be secondary. As NPM1 have a favourable prognosis in de novo AML if not associated with FLT3-ITD we did a respective analysis for overall survival (OS) and (EFS) for our cohort of s-AML after MDS. For this analysis 278 s-AML patients were available: NPM1-/FLT3- (n=223); NPM1+/FLT3- (n=20), NPM1-/FLT3+ (n=20) and NPM1+/FLT3+ (n=12). The total cohort revealed a bad outcome (median OS: 56.6 days and median EFS: 43.5 days; range 2-1049 days for both). The median time for MDS until transformation to AML was 316 days (range: 15-6310 days). No difference with respect to outcome was detected between the four different molecular genetic subgroups. In conclusion, these data 1) show that NPM1 mutations play a major role in the evolution of AML following MDS or MPN. 2) NPM1 mutations can be the first as well as the second hit during transformation. 3) Support the theory of a multistep genetic principle in development of secondary AML. 4) s-AML with a NPM1+/FLT3-ITD- status can not be regarded as prognostically favorable. Disclosures: Schnittger: MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Equity Ownership. Weiss:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Employment. Dicker:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Employment. Sundermann:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Employment. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Lab: Equity Ownership.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with FLAMSA-RIC Can Overcome the Poor Prognosis of Primary Refractory or Relapsed AML

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1938-1938
Author(s):  
Dominik Schneidawind ◽  
Birgit Federmann ◽  
Christoph Faul ◽  
Wichard Vogel ◽  
Lothar Kanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Abstract 1938 Introduction: Patients with relapsed or primary refractory AML have a dismal prognosis. Even salvage therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) could not improve outcome due to high incidence of relapse and high non-relapse mortality (NRM). Recently, promising results in patients with unfavorable karyotype or treatment refractory AML have been reported using a sequential treatment with aplasia inducing chemotherapy consisting of Fludarabine, Ara-C and Amsacrine (FLAMSA) followed within 3 days by reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic HCT (Schmid et al., Blood 2006 Aug 1;108(3):1092–9). Methods: We report a retrospective analysis of our single center experience with FLAMSA-RIC in primary refractory or relapsed AML patients. We searched our database for patients receiving FLAMSA-RIC in the past 10 years. Details on characteristics and clinical course of the patients were confirmed by retrospective chart review. Results: We retrospectively identified and analyzed 51 consecutive patients (f=22, m=29) transplanted after FLAMSA-RIC at our institution from 2006–2011. At time of HCT patients were refractory after chemotherapy (n=22) or had an untreated relapse (n=29). Data on molecular and cytogenetic markers were available in 36 and 44 patients, respectively. 34 were initially high-risk because of unfavorable karyotype (n=25) or molecular genetic alterations (n=9). Median age of patients was 56 years (range, 20–72) and diagnosis of all patients was acute myeloid leukemia (de-novo AML, n=27, secondary AML, n=24). FLAMSA (Fludarabine 30 mg/m2 day −12 to −9, AraC 2000 mg/m2 day −12 to −11 and Amsacrine 100 mg/m2 day −12 to −9) was used as salvage therapy followed by RIC (Fludarabine 30 mg/m2 day −5 to −4/Busulfan 0.8 mg/kg day −6 to −4, n=10; TBI 4Gy on day −5/Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg on day −4 to −3, n=28; Busulfan 0.8 mg/kg day −6 to −4/Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg for matched and mismatched unrelated donors (MUD/MMUD) or 40 mg/kg for matched related donors (MRD) on day −3 to −2, n=13). As GVHD prophylaxis calcineurin inhibitor combined with mycophenolate mofetil and anti-thymocyte globuline (ATG-Fresenius®, 10 mg/kg for MRD and 20 mg/kg for MUD/MMUD) was used. 10 patients were transplanted from MRD, 16 from MUD, 21 from a MMUD and 4 from a MMRD. 14 patients received DLI (2 × 106 - 1 × 108 /kg after a median of 186 days, range 72–922) in absence of GVHD in case of mixed chimerism or relapse after HCT. Current overall survival (OS) was 18/51 patients with a median follow-up of 410 days (range, 179–1557) of patients alive resulting in a Kaplan-Meier estimated 2-year OS and event-free-survival (EFS) of 34% and 29%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the different RIC regimens with 50% Fludarabine / Busulfan vs. 26% TBI 4Gy / Cyclophosphamide and 40% Fludarabine / Busulfan (p=0.37). Causes of death were relapse (n=19), infections (n=5), GVHD (n=2), multi-organ-failure (n=5), cerebral hemorrhage (n=1) and progressive multifocal leukencephalopathy (n=1). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years with death due to NRM as competing risk was 40% and cumulative incidence at 2 years of NRM with death due to relapse as competing risk was 27%. 2-year OS was inferior in patients with secondary AML compared to patients with de-novo AML (28% vs. 38% p=0.79). The outcome in the elderly subgroup defined by age ≥60 years (median age 67, n=22) was similar to the group of younger patients (median age 46, n=29) with 2-year OS of 31% vs. 37% (p=0.87). Patients with a blast count < 10% in the bone marrow at time of HCT had a better outcome with 64% vs. 25% OS (p=0.09). 2-year-OS was inferior in patients being refractory after chemotherapy (25% vs 38%, p=0.78). Incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) ≥II and chronic GVHD (cGVHD, limited, n=11, extensive, n=3) was 22% and 27%, respectively. Presence of aGVHD did not influence survival while presence of cGVHD was associated with an improved overall survival after HCT (58% vs 24%, p=0.009). Conclusion: FLAMSA-RIC followed by allogeneic HCT enables long-term disease free survival, even in primary refractory or relapsed AML patients. The sequential approach of this regimen seems to overcome the dismal prognosis of these patients. Its moderate toxicity allows the application of this curative salvage therapy option even in an elderly patient population. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The use of some agents in the conditioning is off-label.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document