Comprehensive Quality Management of Multiple Electrode Platelet Aggregometry.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4463-4463
Author(s):  
Michael Spannagl ◽  
Andrea Dick ◽  
Andreas Calatzis

Abstract Abstract 4463 Platelet function analysis provides quantitative results which may reveal platelet disorders, platelet inhibition during anti-platelet therapy or anti-platelet drug resistance. The results may have important consequences on patients therapy. As in all laboratory methods, a comprehensive quality management approach is crucial and increasingly demanded by regulatory authorities. In platelet function methods quality control is hampered by the fact that platelets are not stable over longer time periods and loose their functional activities after freezing and freeze-drying. Therefore for most platelet function tests no control materials are available. When no biological quality control material is available, it is even more important to install and maintain a quality management approach, which covers as many influence factors and sources of error as possible. Here we present the quality management procedures of Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA) a relative new platelet function test based on the analysis of whole blood (Multiplate analyzer, Dynabyte medical, Munich, Germany). In the MEA device temperature of the measurement system is controlled by the analyser and can be verified by an external QC kit. The signal reaction of this method is based on the rise of electrical resistance induced by the adhesion and aggregation of activated blood platelets on metal sensor electrodes in a disposable test cell. In order to control possible sensor inconsistencies and improve precision, the test cell incorporates two independent sensor units, each consisting of 2 silver-coated highly conductive wires. The duplicate sensors thus serve as an internal control. During each measurement Pearson's correlation coefficient of single measurements of the curves assessed by the two electrode pairs and the difference of the two AUCs are calculated automatically by the analyzer's software. The result is flagged if the values are outside of the acceptance range (correlation coefficient <0.98, difference to the mean curve >20%). The instrument has an integrated procedure for an electronic control which checks the function of the electronic amplifier in the analyzer. In addition liquid controls are available, based on solutions with different ional strength. Using these solutions the instrument, pipettor and test cells are controlled. Using blood from a healthy individual, users can control qualitatively all aspects of the analysis (instrument, test cells, reagents, pipettor). Abnormal control reagents are available, containing either aspirin, a GpIIbIIIa antagonist or prostaglandin E1, which can produce an abnormal result when added to a normal blood sample before the analysis. The instrument provides an electronic pipettor with interactive software-guided operation procedures, which help standardise the analysis and minimize user-related errors. Using artificial liquid control materials a pilot external QC was performed in 6 individual centers and the results were centrally analyzed. Level I control was determined as 125+-6 aggregation units (AU, mean+-sd), level II control was 64+-5 AU. Coefficients of variation of all determinations were 4.6% and 7.3% respectively. In conclusion it is shown that while a stable biological control material for platelet function analysis is not available, it is possible to perform quality controls covering many parts of the analytical procedure. Manufacturers and users of platelet function tests should try to implement control procedures that cover as many aspects of the technology they apply as possible to ensure correct performance of the tests over the lifetime of the instrument, test cells and reagents. As long as stable biological quality control materials for platelet function analysis are not available, qualitative biological controls using normal blood or plasma should be combined with artificial control materials or electronic test procedures according to the analytical reaction which is performed. If the biological reaction cannot be quantitatively controlled, then at least the physical process leading to the signal of the respective test procedure should be verified (measurement of pressure, optical density or electrical impedance). Using a step by step approach comprehensive quality management of platelet function analysis is feasible and should be implemented in routine. Disclosures: Calatzis: Dynabyte Medical : Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (S 02) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Böck ◽  
Joachim Groh ◽  
Anle Glaser ◽  
Klaus Storck ◽  
Michael Kratzer ◽  
...  

Quality control of platelet concentrates (PC) is an important prerequisite for good transfusion praxis. However, direct measurement of platelet function is complex, since available methods (e.g. aggregometry, serotonin release) are time consuming and require special equipment. Therefore a test system is needed, which is easy to handle, fast, and achieves reliable results. The present paper compares the results of conventional platelet function tests with those of a modified in-vitro bleeding test (IVBT) (Thrombostat 4000) in liquid-stored and cryopreserved PCs. A high correlation between aggregometry, serotonin release, GMP 140 expression upon stimulation, and IVBT was demonstrated. Therefore IVBT seems to be a good alternative to the conventional platelet function tests for quality control of PCs. In addition, a good correlation between the results of IVBT of patients’ blood after PC transfusion and IVBT of patients blood before transfusion supplemented with platelets of the respective PC could be found. Therefore IVBT seems to be able to predict PC transfusion success. However, since these data were obtained in a small sample undergoing bone marrow transplantation, further studies are needed to verify this hypothesis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott Sharp ◽  
Vanessa Fludder

ABSTRACTBackgroundPoint-of-care platelet function tests are used by anaesthetists and surgeons to create risk management plans for patients who have recently taken antiplatelet medication. Thromboelastography (TEG), one method of determining platelet function, sometimes takes >60 minutes to produce results. Previous studies have shown a novel parameter, area under the curve at 15 minutes (AUC15), correlates with clinical outcomes but used privately-owned, custom-made software to calculate AUC15. This study aimed to create a formula that clinicians can use to approximate AUC15 which correlates to the most widely used measure of platelet function, percentage of platelet aggregation.MethodsPlatelet function after 15 minutes can be approximated by the equation: AUC15 = 225(tan(θ)) where θ = α(MAADP/MAThrombin). A retrospective database review was performed on eligible platelet function tests that assessed ADP receptor inhibition on a TEG 6s Hemostasis Analyzer (Haemonetics®) across 15 months. Results were analysed using a bivariate scatter plot with linear regression line and a two-tailed Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated.ResultsForty-seven tests were retrieved, of which, forty-five were eligible for analysis. Pearson two-tailed correlation coefficient showed that AUC15 correlated significantly with percentage of platelet aggregation (R = 0.748, 95% CI [0.582, 0.854], p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study creates the first practical method for clinicians to approximate platelet function on TEG analysers after 15 minutes, instead of >60 minutes, using routinely generated outputs and a calculator. Clinicians who use this method will afford themselves more time to create risk management plans for patients which may improve patient outcomes.


VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berent ◽  
Sinzinger

Based upon various platelet function tests and the fact that patients experience vascular events despite taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or aspirin), it has been suggested that patients may become resistant to the action of this pharmacological compound. However, the term “aspirin resistance” was created almost two decades ago but is still not defined. Platelet function tests are not standardized, providing conflicting information and cut-off values are arbitrarily set. Intertest comparison reveals low agreement. Even point of care tests have been introduced before appropriate validation. Inflammation may activate platelets, co-medication(s) may interfere significantly with aspirin action on platelets. Platelet function and Cox-inhibition are only some of the effects of aspirin on haemostatic regulation. One single test is not reliable to identify an altered response. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to speak about “treatment failure” to aspirin therapy than using the term “aspirin resistance”. There is no evidence based justification from either the laboratory or the clinical point of view for platelet function testing in patients taking aspirin as well as from an economic standpoint. Until evidence based data from controlled studies will be available the term “aspirin resistance” should not be further used. A more robust monitoring of factors resulting in cardiovascular events such as inflammation is recommended.


2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (05) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Behr ◽  
F. Grünwald ◽  
W. H. Knapp ◽  
L. Trümper ◽  
C. von Schilling ◽  
...  

Summary:This guideline is a prerequisite for the quality management in the treatment of non-Hodgkin-lymphomas using radioimmunotherapy. It is based on an interdisciplinary consensus and contains background information and definitions as well as specified indications and detailed contraindications of treatment. Essential topics are the requirements for institutions performing the therapy. For instance, presence of an expert for medical physics, intense cooperation with all colleagues committed to treatment of lymphomas, and a certificate of instruction in radiochemical labelling and quality control are required. Furthermore, it is specified which patient data have to be available prior to performance of therapy and how the treatment has to be carried out technically. Here, quality control and documentation of labelling are of greatest importance. After treatment, clinical quality control is mandatory (work-up of therapy data and follow-up of patients). Essential elements of follow-up are specified in detail. The complete treatment inclusive after-care has to be realised in close cooperation with those colleagues (haematology-oncology) who propose, in general, radioimmunotherapy under consideration of the development of the disease.


Author(s):  
Hamiyet Yilmaz Yasar ◽  
Mustafa Demirpence ◽  
Ayfer Colak ◽  
Banu Ozturk Ceyhan ◽  
Yusuf Temel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document