ABT-737 Targets Leukemic Stem Cells In Mouse Models of Mutant NRASD12/hBCL-2- Mediated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Progression with Increased Survival

Abstract Abstract 3308 Background: Animal models enable us to understand disease progression and provide us with reagents to test various therapeutic strategies. We have previously developed a mouse model of myelodysplasia/acute myelogenous leukemia (MDS/AML) progression using mutant NRASD12 and overexpression of human hBCL-2 (Omidvar et al Cancer Res 67:11657-67, 2007). Expanded leukemic stem cells (LSC) were identified as Lin-/Sca1+/KIT+ (LSK) populations, with increased myeloid colony growth and were transplantable. Increased hBCL-2 and RAS-GTP complex were observed in both MDS/AML diseases. The MDS-like disease had increased apoptosis, whilst the AML-like mice had liver apoptosis patterns similar to wild type. The single NRASD12 line also had increased apoptosis. In this present study using a BCL-2 homology domain 3 (BH3) mimetic ABT-737 (Abbott), we have evaluated the effects of targeting BCL-2 in our preclinical models. Methods & Results: Treatment with the inhibitor shows a reduction of LSK cells, reduced progenitor numbers in colony assays and clearance of the liver infiltrations in both MDS and AML models. Gene expression profiling of the MDS mice shows regulation of 399 genes upon treatment including 58 genes expressed by the single mutant RAS mice and not expressed in the untreated AML mice. 78 genes were shared between single NRASD12 and diseased mice and not the treated mice. These studies potentially identify the contribution of NRASD12 genes to disease progression. By confocal microscopy we observed that in the MDS mice the majority of the RAS and BCL-2 co-localized to the plasma membrane, where active pro-apoptotic RAS is normally located, whereas in the AML disease RAS and BCL-2 co-localized in the mitochondria, where BCL-2 is normally found (Omidvar et al 2007). After treatment with the inhibitor the AML co-localization of RAS and BCL-2 shifted to the plasma membrane where single NRASD12 is normally localized. Furthermore, increased RAS-GTP levels was detected in both Sca1+ and Mac1+ enriched spleen cells and interestingly an increase in BCL-2 expression was observed in peripheral blood and in spleen cells after treatment; this increase in BCL-2 was associated with a decrease in the phosphorylation of serine 70 and an increase in phosphorylation of threonine 56 of BCL-2. ABT-737 treatment led to increased phosphorylated ERK resembling RAS and reduced MEK and AKT phosphorylation, changes detected by western blots and the nanoimmunoassay (NIA, NanoPro, Cell Biosciences) that might account for the increased apoptosis, measured by TUNEL and In vivo imaging by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using Tc-99m-labelled AnnexinV (SPECT). In contrast, although treated MDS mice had increased apoptosis they did not have an increase in overall expression of BCL-2 or in RAS-GTP levels. Treatment of both MDS and AML models with this inhibitor significantly extended lifespan from diagnosis with mean survival of 28 days untreated vs 80 days treated (p=0.0003) and mean survival from birth of 39 untreated vs 85 days treated (p<0.0001) respectively Conclusions: Genomics, proteomics and imaging have been employed in the MDS/AML models to characterize disease progression and follow response to treatment to the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 in order to gain molecular insights in the evaluation of the efficacy. ABT-737 appears to target LSCs, induce apoptosis, regulating RAS and BCL-2 signalling pathways, which translated into significantly increased survival. Disclosures: Padua: Vivavacs SAS: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Auboeuf:GenoSplice technology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Grange:GenoSplice technology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; ROCHE: Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tu:Cell Biosciences Inc;: Employment. Yang:Cell Biosciences Inc;: Employment. Weissman:Amgen, Systemix, Stem cells Inc, Cellerant: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Felsher:Cell Bioscience:. Chomienne:Vivavacs SAS: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Low- or Int-1- Risk MDS Results in Reduced Bleeding without Impacting Leukemic Progression: Final Follow-up Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2000.2000 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2000-2000

Author(s):

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Jeffrey Szer ◽

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia occurs in ~50% of patients with low/int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with reduced survival. In a placebo (PBO)-controlled study, 250 patients with MDS were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly romiplostim or PBO. In the original June 2011 analysis, romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) romiplostim vs PBO 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66−1.05, P = 0.13] and platelet transfusions (relative risk 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66−0.88, P<0.001) and increased IWG hematologic improvement platelets (HI-P) incidence (odds ratio 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7−51.8, P<0.001). Peripheral blast count increases >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%) and resolved after discontinuation in most cases. In February 2011, the DMC recommended that treatment with study drug be discontinued as the potential benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML, and that transient increases in blast cell counts might put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Patients were moved into long-term follow-up (LTFU). Previously reported (Giagounidis et al, Cancer 2014) 58-week incidence of AML was 6.0% (N = 10) for romiplostim and 4.9% for PBO (N = 4); HR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38−3.84). This report provides final 5-year LTFU data. Methods: Eligible patients were receiving only supportive care and had IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS and platelets 1) ≤20 × 109/L or 2) ≤50 × 109/L with a history of bleeding. Disease progression to AML was defined as 1) ≥20% blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 weeks following discontinuation of romiplostim; 2) pathology consistent with leukemia; or 3) antileukemic treatment. Results are presented by treatment group. Results: At baseline, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) years, the majority (59%) of patients were male; 27.6% were IPSS low risk and 72.4% were int-1 risk. WHO classifications were RCMD: 67.6%, RAEB-1: 13.2%, MDS-U: 11.2%, RA: 4.4%, RCMD-RS: 2.4%, RARS: 0.8%, and RAEB-2: 0.4%. Of 250 patients in the study, 210 entered LTFU and 66 completed the 5 years of LTFU; median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 27.5 (10.8, 58.7) months. Reasons for discontinuation (death, lost to follow-up, and consent withdrawal) during LTFU were similar in both groups. During the active study period and LTFU, death was reported in 93 (55.7%) patients in the romiplostim group and 45 (54.2%) patients in the PBO group (HR romiplostim vs PBO 1.03, 95% CI: 0.72−1.47) (Figure); mortality rates were greater in those with IPSS int-1 vs low risk for both groups (Table). AML was reported in 20 (11.9%) patients in the romiplostim group and 9 (11.0%) patients in the PBO group (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.48−2.33). The proportions of patients who either died or developed AML were 56.9% (N = 95) in the romiplostim group and 55.4% (N = 46) in the PBO group (HR for AML-free survival 1.04, 95% CI: 0.73−1.48) (Figure). Nearly half (N = 14, 48%) of the 29 AML cases occurred in patients who were RAEB-1 at screening (none RAEB-2), and 6 cases were diagnosed because of anti-AML treatment use alone (Table). In LTFU, patient-reported use of MDS therapy (eg, azacitidine or cyclosporine) was 42.8% (N = 59, 95% CI: 34.4%−51.5%) in the romiplostim group and 31.4% (N = 22, 95% CI: 20.9%−43.6%) in the PBO group. AML therapy (eg, chemotherapy) was used in 14 (10.2%) patients in the romiplostim group and 7 (10.0%) patients in the PBO group. Conclusions: Following the decision in 2011 to stop study drug secondary to increased AML rates at that time and transient blasts increases, final 5-year LTFU HRs (romiplostim vs placebo) for death or progression to AML, respectively, are 1.03 (95% CI: 0.72−1.47) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48−2.33). In conclusion, romiplostim reduced bleeding events and platelet transfusions, with no increase in AML incidence or impact on survival. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Fenaux:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Research Funding. Gaidano:Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Angelini: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Update On the Phase IIb, Open-Label Study of Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3890.3890 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3890-3890 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

David Siegel ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Thorsten Graef ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Objective Response ◽

Open Label ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cutaneous Manifestations ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3890 Poster Board III-826 Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. MM accounts for approximately 1% of all new cancer diagnoses and is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults. Despite recent advances in therapy, MM remains largely incurable and there is a need to develop new treatments or treatment regimens to combat MM. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor approved for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations of T-cell lymphoma in patients with progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. As HDACs are over-expressed and involved in the regulation of transcription with recruitment by oncogenic transcription factors in a variety of tumor types, the efficacy of vorinostat is currently under investigation in a number of hematologic and solid malignancies, including MM. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has provided significant survival advantages for patients with MM. Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of vorinostat and bortezomib synergistically induces MM cell apoptosis. Results from two Phase I studies showed that the combination of vorinostat and bortezomib (+/- dexamethasone) is well tolerated and achieves ∼ 40% objective response rate in a relapsed/refractory MM population, even in those patients who were refractory to prior bortezomib treatment (Weber et al. Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma 2009;9:S44, abstract A248) (Weber et al. Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma 2009; 9:S42, abstract A242). Encouraging results observed in these trials led to the design of a Phase IIb, international, multicenter, open-label study that will assess the efficacy and tolerability of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in advanced MM patients. Methods Patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsed and refractory MM after two prior treatment regimens, including at least one bortezomib-containing regimen, and who are relapsed, refractory, intolerant, or ineligible for other therapies, including immunomodulatory agents, were included in this trial. Patients received intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and oral vorinostat 400 mg once daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. The addition of oral dexamethasone (20 mg on the day of and day after each bortezomib dose) was permitted for patients who experienced disease progression after two treatment cycles or no change (stable disease) after four cycles, until further disease progression. The primary endpoint is objective response rate and secondary endpoints include assessment of: safety, time to disease progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Patient-reported outcomes were collected in this study as an exploratory objective. Study enrollment At the time of submission, 38 patients (out of 142) have been enrolled in the trial. A first interim futility analysis is planned after the 43rd patient has been enrolled. At the time of the meeting, safety data, along with enrollment status and timelines for future data read-outs, will be reported. Disclosures: Siegel: Celegne: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Graef:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pietrangelo:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lupinacci:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiser:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizvi:Merck: Employment. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Hematopoietic Stem Cells Develop in the Absence of Endothelial Cadherin 5 Expression

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1165.1165 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1165-1165

Author(s):

Heidi Anderson ◽

Taylor Patch ◽

Pavan Reddy ◽

Elliott Hagedorn ◽

Owen J. Tamplin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Endothelial Cells ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemogenic Endothelium ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Rare endothelial cells in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) transition into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) during embryonic development. Lineage tracing experiments indicate that HSCs emerge from Cadherin 5 (Cdh5, VE-cadherin)+ endothelial precursors, and isolated populations of Cdh5+ cells from mouse embryos and embryonic stem (ES) cells can be differentiated into hematopoietic cells. Cdh5 has also been widely implicated as a marker of AGM-derived hemogenic endothelial cells. Since Cdh5-/- mice embryos die before the first HSCs emerge, it is unknown if Cdh5 has a direct role in HSC emergence. Our previous genetic screen yielded malbec (mlbbw306), a zebrafish mutant for cdh5, with normal embryonic and definitive blood. Utilizing time-lapse imaging, parabiotic surgical pairing of zebrafish embryos, and blastula transplantation assays, we show that HSCs emerge, migrate, engraft, and differentiate in the absence of cdh5 expression. By tracing Cdh5-/- GFP+/+ cells inchimeric mice, we demonstrated that Cdh5-/- GFP+/+ HSCs emerging from E10.5 and E11.5 AGM or derived from E13.5 fetal liver not only differentiate into hematopoietic colonies but also engraft and reconstitute multi-lineage adult blood. These data establish that Cdh5, a marker of hemogenic endothelium in the AGM, is dispensable for the transition of hemogenic endothelium to HSCs. Disclosures Bauer: Biogen: Research Funding; Editas Medicine: Consultancy. Zon:FATE Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder; Scholar Rock: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder. Orkin:Editas Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sangamo Biosciences: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Crowdsourced High-Risk Classifiers for Multiple Myeloma Patients Commonly Identify PHF19 As a Robust Progression Biomarker

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127362 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4370-4370

Author(s):

Michael J Mason ◽

Carolina D. Schinke ◽

Christine Eng ◽

Fadi Towfic ◽

Fred Gruber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells residing within the bone marrow with 25,000-30,000 patients diagnosed in the United States each year. The disease's clinical course depends on a complex interplay chromosomal abnormalities and mutations within plasma cells and patient socio-demographic factors. Novel treatments extended the time to disease progression and overall survival for the majority of patients. However, a subset of 15%-20% of MM patients exhibit an aggressive disease course with rapid disease progression and poor overall survival regardless of treatment. Accurately predicting which patients are at high-risk is critical to designing studies with a better understanding of myeloma progression and enabling the discovery of novel therapeutics that extend the progression free period of these patients. To date, most MM risk models use patient demographic data, clinical laboratory results and cytogenetic assays to predict clinical outcome. High-risk associated cytogenetic alterations include deletion of 17p or gain of 1q as well as t(14;16), t(14;20), and most commonly t(4,14), which leads to juxtaposition of MMSET with the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus promoter, resulting in overexpression of the MMSET oncogene. While cytogenetic assays, in particular fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), are widely available, their risk prediction is sub-optimal and recently developed gene expression based classifiers predict more accurately rapid progression. To investigate possible improvements to models of myeloma risk, we organized the Multiple Myeloma DREAM Challenge, focusing on predicting high-risk, defined as disease progression or death prior to 18 months from diagnosis. This effort combined 4 discovery datasets providing participants with clinical, cytogenetic, demographic and gene expression data to facilitate model development while retaining 4 additional datasets, whose clinical outcome was not publicly available, in order to benchmark submitted models. This crowd-sourced effort resulted in the unbiased assessment of 171 predictive algorithms on the validation dataset (N = 823 unique patient samples). Analysis of top performing methods identified high expression of PHF19, a histone methyltransferase, as the gene most strongly associated with disease progression, showing greater predictive power than the expression level of the putative high-risk gene MMSET. We show that a simple 4 feature model composed of age, stage and the gene expression of PHF19 and MMSET is as accurate as much larger published models composed of over 50 genes combined with ISS and age. Results from this work suggest that combination of gene expression and clinical data increases accuracy of high risk models which would improve patient selection in the clinic. Disclosures Towfic: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dalton:MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. Ortiz:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trotter:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dervan:Celgene: Employment. Flynt:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:M2Gen: Employment. Bassett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sonneveld:SkylineDx: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shain:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Munshi:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation, Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel expenses. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Clinical Response to Idasanutlin (RG7388) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Associated with Pre-Treatment MDM2 Protein Expression in Leukemic Blasts and Leukemic Stem Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2580.2580 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2580-2580

Author(s):

Bernhard Reis ◽

Lori Jukofsky ◽

Gong Chen ◽

Giovanni Martinelli ◽

Hua Zhong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Protein Expression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Leukemic Stem Cells ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mdm2 Protein ◽

Mutational Status ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Pre Treatment

Abstract Introduction. Despite years of translational research and discovery, outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia remain poor. The MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin has shown promising clinical activity in solid tumors and acute leukemias. Idasanutlin enhances the activity of the tumor suppressor, p53, through antagonism of MDM2:p53 interaction. Such protein:protein disruption abolishes MDM2 targeting of p53 for ubiquitination and degradation. Subsequent stabilization of the p53 protein allows it to exert tumor suppressor transcriptional regulation and induction of apoptotic pathways. Identification of patients in whom functional p53 activation drives efficacy may translate into improved outcomes for patients treated with idasanutlin. Patients and Methods. Trial NP28679 (NCT01773408) is a Phase 1/1b study evaluating idasanutlin (as monotherapy or in combination with cytarabine) in relapsed or refractory AML patients, with clinical response as the primary endpoint. To identify biomarkers of response, patients' pre-treatment peripheral blood specimens were evaluated for MDM2 protein expression levels in leukemic blasts and leukemic stem cells. Association of MDM2 percent cell positivity with clinical outcomes was evaluated using intracellular flow cytometry gated on CD45dim leukemic blasts and CD45dim/CD117+/CD34+ leukemic stem cells. Results. We observed in a proof-of-principle training data set that MDM2 expression in leukemic blasts was associated with patients more likely to exhibit Complete Remission (CR, CRp, CRi) versus Progressive Disease (PD, HI, PR) [n=61; Wilcoxon p = .0041 (AUC = .74; 95%CI[.57, .91])] TP53 mutational status alone was not tightly associated with patient response (Fisher's Exact Test p = .19 [AUC = .60; 95%CI [.52,.67.])] When MDM2 protein expression and TP53 mutational status were analyzed as co-variates, an enhanced association with patient CR was observed (AUC = .76; 95% CI [.59, .93.]) A separate group of patients treated with an optimized idasanutlin formulation was utilized as a validation set. Association of CR with MDM2 expression in blasts was also shown in this separate patient population [n=24; Wilcoxon p = .0052 (AUC = .82; 95% CI [.64, 1.00.]) Comparable results were observed for proof-of-principle and validation set analyses of response association with MDM2 protein expression in AML patients CD45dim/CD117+/CD34+ stem cell subpopulations. Conclusions. In summary, training and validation sets reveal that MDM2 protein expression in leukemic blasts and stem cells are associated with idasanutlin-induced CR in patients with AML. We will continue to monitor this potentially predictive biomarker in future randomized clinical studies of idasanutlin. On a broader level, the data presented here support the concept that leukemic blasts may be "oncogene-addicted" to MDM2 in AML, i.e. that AML tumor cells may rely on a dominant oncogene for growth and survival, such that inhibition of the function of this specific oncogene is sufficient to halt the neoplastic phenotype. Thus, the concept of oncogene addiction may apply not only to mutated kinases but also to ubiquitin ligases such as MDM2. Disclosures Reis: Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jukofsky:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Martinelli:BMS: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Zhong:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. So:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drummond:Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assouline:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Hashemyan:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Theron:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blotner:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rueger:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Middleton:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vey:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Nichols:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pierceall:Roche Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Rationale for Therapy Discontinuation in Patients with Lower-Risk Transfusion-Dependent Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3541.3541 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3541-3541

Author(s):

Aaron T. Gerds ◽

Shaloo Gupta ◽

Gary Binder ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Aziz Nazha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Discontinuation ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 50% of patients with MDS are anemic at initial diagnosis, with many becoming transfusion dependent (TD), necessitating the introduction of therapy with a goal of achieving transfusion independence (TI). In addition to transfusions, treatments to improve hemoglobin levels have historically been limited to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), whereas patients with more advanced disease may require treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) (azacitidine [AZA] or decitabine [DAC]) or lenalidomide (LEN). As there is no predetermined treatment course, these therapies are continued until unacceptable toxicity, lack/loss of response, or disease progression. We examined treatment patterns, clinical outcome(s) of patients with MDS, and the physician's report of reason for treatment discontinuation (previously shown to vary from patients' perspectives) in patients who became TD at or after MDS diagnosis (Gerds et al. Blood 2014;124:abstract 2642). Methods:Data were derived from disease-specific physician surveys and patient charts, which provided information on demographic, treatment, and outcome data on lower-risk TD MDS patients. Patient inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of Low/Intermediate-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System defined) 2-6 years prior to study entry, and becoming TD at least once during the minimum follow-up of 24 months. TD was defined as having received ≥ 2 transfusions within 8 weeks during the follow-up period. Patients who progressed to higher-risk disease or acute myeloid leukemia prior to becoming TD, had an additional malignancy, or were in an MDS clinical trial were excluded. Demographics, disease history, treatment history, TI, and reasons for treatment discontinuation were collected and reported descriptively. Results: A total of 239 physicians provided information on 1,221 lower-risk TD MDS patients. The median age of patients was 65 years (range 27-95 years), 56.3% were male, and median time since diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 2-6 years). Along with packed red blood cell transfusions, 354 patients (29%) were prescribed LEN [of whom 12.7% had del(5q)], 348 patients (28.5%) were prescribed ESAs, and 32 patients (2.6%) were prescribed HMAs. During the follow-up period, 31.3% of ESA patients discontinued therapy (at a median of 12 months; range 3-47 months), 32% of HMA patients discontinued therapy (at a median of 10 months; range 3-52 months), and 26% of LEN patients discontinued therapy (at a median of 13 months; range 2-30 months). In the LEN-treated group, only 9.8% of patients who discontinued therapy had del(5q). The main reason cited for treatment discontinuation across therapy groups reported by physicians was "patients completing the scheduled course of treatment" (28.2%), which occurred in 32.6%, 20.2%, and 22.6% of the LEN, ESA, and HMA groups, respectively. Other reported reasons for discontinuation included "insufficient initial response" (20.0%), "patients no longer responding to therapy" (19.0%), "disease progression" (18.0%), "death" (13.3%), and "worsening hemoglobin levels" (12.8%). Across therapy groups, "patient preference to stop therapy" was reported less frequently (9.7%), occurring in 7.6%, 8.3%, and 12.9% of the LEN, ESA, and HMA groups, respectively. Conclusions:Over 30% of TD lower-risk MDS patients receiving LEN, ESAs, AZA, or DAC discontinued therapy. Per physician reports, the most frequent reason for discontinuation of therapy was completion of scheduled treatment course, which is in stark contrast to recommendations in consensus guidelines, as MDS is a chronic disease in which treatment should be continued ad infinitum. The significant number of patients who stop therapy for alternative reasons suggests opportunities for further investigation. Education on the expected duration of therapy is essential to help support physicians and inform patients about optimal treatment decisions in the care of all MDS patients. Disclosures Gupta: Kantar Health: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Binder:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Carraway:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hawthorne:Kantar Health: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. King-Concialdi:Kantar Health: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. McGuire:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Gaps in Perception Between Patients and Physicians Regarding Symptomatology and Treatment Attitudes for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: MPN LANDMARK SURVEY

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4827.4827 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4827-4827 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ruben Mesa ◽

Carole B Miller ◽

Maureen Thyne ◽

James Mangan ◽

Sara Goldberger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Burden ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽

Physician Communication ◽

Treatment Goals ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background : Patients diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET), experience disease burdens that can negatively affect their quality of life. Disconnects between patient and physician perceptions of disease burden or poor patient-physician communication may delay or prevent achievement of treatment goals. The MPN LANDMARK SURVEY is the first large US-based survey designed to evaluate disease burden and patient-physician communication in MPN disease settings. Methods : All eligible patients diagnosed with 1 of the 3 MPNs and physicians treating patients with MPNs that were recruited were surveyed in the US during May-July 2014.The surveys included ≤67 questions (depending on the type of MPN and respondent) and required approximately 20–25 minutes to complete. Descriptive analyses were conducted to identify gaps in perceptions of disease burden and patient-physician communication. Results : The MPN LANDMARK SURVEY was completed by 813 patients (MF=207; PV=380; ET=226) and 457 physicians. Approximately half of the patients were 60–74 years of age (MF, 55%; PV, 51%; ET, 46%), the majority were female (MF, 54%; PV, 62%; ET, 72%) and had a degree from a 4-year college or postgraduate institution (MF, 65%; PV, 65%; ET, 58%), and >98% had health insurance. The majority of physicians graduated from medical school 5–24 years before the survey (67%) and practiced in outpatient settings (single specialty groups, 42%; academic hospitals, 31%). Patient-physician communication gaps were identified in several important areas: (1) Prognostic assessment: most patients did not recall receiving a prognostic risk score, but most physicians reported classifying patients by prognostic risk (Table 1). (2) Symptom assessment: physicians were more likely than patients to report that physicians ask about patients' most important disease-related symptoms or about a full and comprehensive list of symptoms (Table 1). (3) Treatment goals: the most important treatment goals were different in MF (patients: delay disease progression; physicians: improve symptoms) and PV (patients: delay disease progression; physicians: prevent vascular/thrombotic events) settings (Table 2). Patients and physicians in the ET setting both reported that prevention of vascular/thrombotic events was the most important treatment goal. Patients and physicians in the MF and PV settings reported fatigue as the most pressing disease manifestation that patients would like to resolve (MF: patients, 47%; physicians, 65%; PV: patients, 33%; physicians, 31%), whereas patients and physicians differed in the ET setting (patients: fatigue, 33%; physicians: stroke, 29%). Most patients reported a desire to be ≥50% responsible for their treatment decisions (MF, 72%; PV, 71%; ET, 75%). Physicians reported that most patients sometimes or often did not wish to comply with their primary treatment recommendation (MF, 77%; PV, 84%; ET, 79%). (4) Treatment satisfaction: overall, more than one third of patients were somewhat satisfied or dissatisfied with their physician's communication about their condition and treatment (MF, 34%; PV, 43%; ET, 45%) and with their physician's overall management of their disease (MF, 36%; PV, 40%; ET, 42%). Among patients who changed their MPN doctor (MF, 47%; PV, 46%; ET, 56%), dissatisfaction with prior care received was the most frequently reported reason for the change (MF, 40%; PV, 37%; ET, 33%). Approximately one fifth to one fourth of patients included their doctor's office among the most helpful sources of information about their diagnosis (MF, 27%; PV, 22%; ET, 20%), and most patients included the internet among the most helpful sources (MF, 90%; PV, 87%; ET, 89%). Conclusion : Important disconnects exist between patients' and physicians' perceptions in MPN disease settings. In addition, the majority of physicians report classifying patients by prognostic risk, including PV and ET settings, which do not have widely accepted prognostic risk scores. Although physicians generally appreciate the burden that MPNs have on patients, patient management may be enhanced with improved elucidation of patient symptoms and clear communication regarding the goals and potential benefits of interventions. Disclosures Mesa: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Miller:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Thyne:Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Mangan:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goldberger:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fazal:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ma:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Wilson:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Dubinski:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boyle:ICF International: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mascarenhas:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Rapid and Robust Mobilization of CD34+ HSCs without G-CSF Following Administration of Mgta-145 Alone or in Combination with Plerixafor

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127523 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1961-1961

Author(s):

John F. DiPersio ◽

Jonathan Hoggatt ◽

Steven Devine ◽

Lukasz Biernat ◽

Haley Howell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Single Dose ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Preliminary Data ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fold Change ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard of care for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). G-CSF requires 4-7 days of injections and often multiple aphereses to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells for transplant. The number of CD34+ HSCs mobilized can be variable and patients who fail to mobilize enough CD34+ cells are treated with the combination of G-CSF plus plerixafor. G-CSF use is associated with bone pain, nausea, headaches, fatigue, rare episodes of splenic rupture, and is contraindicated for patients with autoimmune and sickle cell disease. MGTA-145 (GroβT) is a CXCR2 agonist. MGTA-145, in combination with plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has the potential to rapidly and reliably mobilize robust numbers of HSCs with a single dose and same-day apheresis for transplant that is free from G-CSF. MGTA-145 plus plerixafor work synergistically to rapidly mobilize HSCs in both mice and non-human primates (Hoggatt, Cell 2018; Goncalves, Blood 2018). Based on these data, Magenta initiated a Phase 1 dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, PK and PD of MGTA-145 as a single agent and in combination with plerixafor. Methods This study consists of four parts. In Part A, healthy volunteers were dosed with MGTA-145 (0.0075 - 0.3 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part B, MGTA-145 dose levels from Part A were selected for use in combination with a clinically approved dose of plerixafor. In Part C, a single dose MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered on day 1 and day 2. In Part D, MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered followed by apheresis. Results MGTA-145 monotherapy was well tolerated in all subjects dosed (Table 1) with no significant adverse events. Some subjects experienced mild (Grade 1) transient lower back pain that dissipated within minutes. In the ongoing study, the combination of MGTA-145 with plerixafor was well tolerated, with some donors experiencing Grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal adverse events commonly observed with plerixafor alone. Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and maximum plasma concentrations increased dose proportionally and were not affected by plerixafor (Fig 1A). Monotherapy of MGTA-145 resulted in an immediate increase in neutrophils (Fig 1B) and release of plasma MMP-9 (Fig 1C). Neutrophil mobilization plateaued within 1-hour post MGTA-145 at doses greater than 0.03 mg/kg. This plateau was followed by a rebound of neutrophil mobilization which correlated with re-expression of CXCR2 and presence of MGTA-145 at pharmacologically active levels. Markers of neutrophil activation were relatively unchanged (<2-fold vs baseline). A rapid and statistically significant increase in CD34+ cells occurred @ 0.03 and 0.075 mg/kg of MGTA-145 (p < 0.01) relative to placebo with peak mobilization (Fig 1D) 30 minutes post MGTA-145 (7-fold above baseline @ 0.03 mg/kg). To date, the combination of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor mobilized >20/µl CD34s in 92% (11/12) subjects compared to 50% (2/4) subjects receiving plerixafor alone. Preliminary data show that there was a significant increase in fold change relative to baseline in CD34+ cells (27x vs 13x) and phenotypic CD34+CD90+CD45RA- HSCs (38x vs 22x) mobilized by MGTA-145 with plerixafor. Mobilized CD34+ cells were detectable at 15 minutes with peak mobilization shifted 2 - 4 hours earlier for the combination vs plerixafor alone (4 - 6h vs 8 - 12h). Detailed results of single dose administration of MGTA-145 and plerixafor given on one day as well as also on two sequential days will be presented along with fully characterized graft analysis post apheresis from subjects given MGTA-145 and plerixafor. Conclusions MGTA-145 is safe and well tolerated, as a monotherapy and in combination with plerixafor and induced rapid and robust mobilization of significant numbers of HSCs with a single dose in all subjects to date. Kinetics of CD34+ cell mobilization for the combination was immediate (4x increase vs no change for plerixafor alone @ 15 min) suggesting the mechanism of action of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor is different from plerixafor alone. Preliminary data demonstrate that MGTA-145 when combined with plerixafor results in a significant increase in CD34+ fold change relative to plerixafor alone. Magenta Therapeutics intends to develop MGTA-145 as a first line mobilization product for blood cancers, autoimmune and genetic diseases and plans a Phase 2 study in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2020. Disclosures DiPersio: Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hoggatt:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Protocol development (via institution); Bristol Myers: Other: Grant for monitoring support & travel support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Travel support for advisory board; My employer (National Marrow Donor Program) has equity interest in Magenta. Biernat:Medpace, Inc.: Employment. Howell:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schmelmer:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neale:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Goncalves:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raffel:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Falahee:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Morrow:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Davis:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Connect® MM Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126205 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3129-3129

Author(s):

Hans C. Lee ◽

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Robert M. Rifkin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Causes Of Death ◽

Age Groups ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Age Group ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is common among the elderly, with 35% of patients (pts) diagnosed being aged ≥75 years (y). With increasing overall life expectancy, the incidence and prevalence of newly diagnosed and previously treated MM patients ≥80 y is expected to increase over time. Because elderly pts are often excluded from clinical trials, data focused on their treatment patterns and clinical outcomes are lacking. The Connect® MM Registry (NCT01081028) is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of pts with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) designed to examine real-world diagnostic patterns, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes. This analysis reviews treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly pts from the Connect MM Registry. Methods: Pts enrolled in the Connect MM registry at 250 community, academic, and government sites were included in this analysis. Eligible pts were adults aged ≥18 y with symptomatic MM diagnosed ≤2 months before enrollment, as defined by International Myeloma Working Group criteria; no exclusion criteria were applied. For this analysis, pts were categorized into 4 age groups: <65, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and ≥85 y. Pts were followed from time of enrollment to the earliest of disease progression (or death), loss to follow-up, or data cutoff date of February 7, 2019. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics and treatment regimens. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression. Time to progression (TTP) analysis excluded causes of death not related to MM. Results: Of 3011 pts enrolled (median age 67 y), 132 (4%) were aged ≥85 y, and 615 (20%) were aged 75-84 y at baseline. More pts aged ≥85 y had poor prognostic factors such as ISS stage III disease and reduced hemoglobin (<10 g/dL or >2 g/dL <LLN) compared with other age groups, although no notable differences between creatinine and calcium levels were observed across age groups (Table). A lower proportion of elderly pts (75-84 and ≥85 y) received triplet regimens as frontline therapy. More elderly pts received a single novel agent, whereas use of 2 novel agents was more common in younger pts (Table). The most common frontline regimens among elderly pts were bortezomib (V) + dexamethasone (D), followed by lenalidomide (R) + D, whereas those among younger pts included RVD, followed by VD and CyBorD (Table). No pt aged ≥85 y, and 4% of pts aged 75-84 y received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (vs 61% in the <65 y and 37% in the 65-74 y age group). The most common maintenance therapy was RD in pts ≥85 y (although the use was low) and R alone in other age groups (Table). In the ≥85 y group, 27%, 10%, and 4% of pts entered 2L, 3L, and 4L treatments respectively, vs 43%, 23%, and 13% in the <65 y group. Progression-free survival was significantly shorter in the ≥85 y age group vs the 75-84 y age group (P=0.003), 65-74 y age group (P<0.001), and <65 y age group (P<0.001; Fig.1). TTP was significantly shorter in the ≥85 y group vs the <65 y group (P=0.020); however, TTP was similar among the 65-74 y, 75-84 y, and ≥85 y cohorts (Fig. 2). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the ≥85 y group vs the 75-84 y, 65-74 y, and <65 y groups (all P<0.001; Fig. 3). The mortality rate was lowest (46%) during first-line treatment (1L) in pts aged ≥85 y (mainly attributed to MM progression) and increased in 2L and 3L (47% and 54%, respectively); a similar trend was observed in the younger age groups. The main cause of death was MM progression (29% in the ≥85 y vs 16% in the <65 y group). Other notable causes of death in the ≥85 y group included cardiac failure (5% vs 2% in <65 y group) and pneumonia (5% vs 1% in <65 y group). Conclusions: In this analysis, elderly pts received similar types of frontline and maintenance regimens as younger pts, although proportions varied with decreased use of triplet regimens with age. Considering similarities in TTP across the 65-74 y, 75-84 y, and ≥85 y cohorts, these real-world data support active treatment and aggressive supportive care of elderly symptomatic pts, including with novel agents. Additionally, further clinical studies specific to elderly patients with MM should be explored. Disclosures Lee: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline plc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ailawadhi:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellectar: Research Funding. Gasparetto:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Jagannath:AbbVie: Consultancy; Merck & Co.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Rifkin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Terebelo:Celgene: Honoraria; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau; Newland Medical Asociates: Employment. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Hardin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wagner:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; American Cancer Society: Other: Section editor, Cancer journal. Omel:Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Other: Patient Advisory Committees. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:TechData: Consultancy. Dhalla:Celgene: Employment. Agarwal:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Abonour:BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Impact of Modified Thalidomide Dosing in Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant-Eligible: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122775 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4739-4739

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Adrián Alegre ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Post Induction ◽

Adjusted Indirect Comparison ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: For patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are transplant-eligible, bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTd) is a standard of care (SoC) for induction and consolidation therapy. Clinical practice has evolved to use a modified VTd dose (VTd-mod; 100 mg thalidomide daily), which is reflected in recent treatment guidelines. As VTd-mod has become a real-world SoC, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the VTd-mod dose from recent clinical trials versus the dose included in the label (VTd-label; ramp up to 200 mg thalidomide daily) was performed to understand the effect on efficacy of modified VTd dosing for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. Methods: For each outcome (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], overall response rates [ORR] post-induction and post-transplant, and rate of peripheral neuropathy), a naïve comparison and a MAIC were performed. Data for VTd-label were obtained from the phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study (Rosiñol L, et al. Blood. 2012;120[8]:1589-1596). Data for VTd-mod were pooled from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study (Moreau P, et al. Lancet. 2019;394[10192]:29-38) and the phase 2 NCT00531453 study (Ludwig H, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31[2]:247-255). Patient-level data for PETHEMA/GEM and CASSIOPEIA were used to generate outcomes of interest and were validated against their respective clinical study reports; aggregate data for NCT00531453 were extracted from the primary publication. Matched baseline characteristics were age, sex, ECOG performance status, myeloma type, International Staging System (ISS) stage, baseline creatinine clearance, hemoglobin level, and platelet count. Results: Patients received VTd-mod (n = 591) or VTd-label (n = 130). After matching, baseline characteristics were similar across groups. For OS, the naïve comparison and the MAIC showed that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC HR, 0.640 [95% CI: 0.363-1.129], P = 0.121; Figure 1A). VTd-mod significantly improved PFS versus VTd-label in the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC HR, 0.672 [95% CI: 0.467-0.966], P = 0.031; Figure 1B). Post-induction ORR was non-inferior for VTd-mod versus VTd-label (MAIC odds ratio, 1.781 [95% CI: 1.004-3.16], P = 0.065). Post-transplant, VTd-mod demonstrated superior ORR in both the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC odds ratio, 2.661 [95% CI: 1.579-4.484], P = 0.001). For rates of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy, the naïve comparison and MAIC both demonstrated that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC rate difference, 2.4 [⁻1.7-6.49], P = 0.409). Conclusions: As naïve, indirect comparisons are prone to bias due to patient heterogeneity between studies, a MAIC can provide useful insights for clinicians and reimbursement decision-makers regarding the relative efficacy and safety of different treatments. In this MAIC, non-inferiority of VTd-mod versus VTd-label was demonstrated for OS, post-induction ORR, and peripheral neuropathy. This analysis also showed that VTd-mod significantly improved PFS and ORR post-transplant compared with VTd-label for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. A limitation of this analysis is that unreported or unobserved confounding factors could not be adjusted for. Disclosures Sonneveld: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mateos:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Adaptive: Honoraria; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech Inc, Mundipharma EDO, PharmaMar, Roche Laboratories Inc, Takeda Oncology: Other: Advisory Committee; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Abbvie, EDO, Pharmar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Takeda Oncology.: Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc: Other: Data and Monitoring Committee. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Hashim:Ingress-Health: Employment. Vincken:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kampfenkel:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cote:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text