High Response Rate in Patients with De-Novo or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using a Novel Strategy of Low-Dose, Prolonged Administration of Cytarabine and Thioguanine in Combination with Filgrastim in the Ambulatory Setting: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2624-2624
Author(s):  
Christopher K Arthur ◽  
Brandon Aubrey ◽  
Matthew Greenwood ◽  
Keith Fay ◽  
Luke Coyle ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2624 The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) increases with age and outcomes for elderly patients remain poor. Furthermore, intensive induction chemotherapy is often unsuitable for elderly patients and can result in significant periods of inpatient care. Recent understanding of leukemia stem cell cycling suggests that prolonged cytotoxic exposure, e.g. >14–21 days, could provide a more effective anti-leukemic effect than the typical 5–7 days schedules during which time very few leukemic stem cells would be likely to undergo cell division. We have been using prolonged low-dose cytarabine schedules as reported 20 years ago (Hellstrom-Lindberg, Brit J Haem,1992;81:503), however we have combined this with oral thioguanine, a purine analogue that may synergize with cytarabine. Concomitant filgrastim or pegfilgrastim was given to minimize neutropenia and for its possible synergizing anti-leukemic effect when combined with cytotoxic agents. Encouraging experience with this schedule in a few relapsed/refractory elderly AML patients prompted us to use this strategy in elderly de-novo patients unsuitable for standard induction. Surprisingly good results prompted us to report our preliminary experience with this novel strategy. This report is a retrospective, single-center analysis of outcomes in elderly patients with AML managed as outpatients in an ambulatory care day unit. Between April 2009 and March 2011, 14 patients with either relapsed/refractory AML (n=5) or de novo AML (n=9) unsuitable for intensive therapy were treated using prolonged, low-dose cytarabine 20mg/m2/day subcutaneously and thioguanine 80mg/day orally. Treatment was given for 21 days followed by a 14 day break after which the schedule was repeated until remission. After obtaining remission, patients received a maintenance schedule consisting of 14 days on treatment with rest periods increasing from 14 to 28 days according to tolerance and time on therapy, with an intention to continue maintenance for 2 years. All patients received the treatment in an ambulatory care unit with supportive care including filgrastim or pegfilgrastim, blood and platelet transfusion as required, regular clinical review and prophylactic antibiotics and antifungal agents. Patient age ranged from 52 to 89 years (median 75y). All patients had intermediate or poor risk cytogenetics. A morphologic remission according to bone marrow aspirate was obtained in 8 patients (57.1%), with relapse seen in 1 patient at 2.6 months follow-up. Remission was maintained in 7 patients (50%) with follow-up ranging from 4.7 to 26.6 months (median 9.7 months), including 1 patient who was refractory to standard first and second-line induction chemotherapy. Refractoriness to treatment occurred in 5 patients (35.7%). Mortality relating to disease progression occurred in 3 patients (21.4%) and 1 patient died secondary to infection. All patients developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia but severe mucositis was not seen. The infection rate was low and hospital admission was uncommon. Nausea was common but manageable and significant liver toxicity was not observed. This study demonstrates that effective management of AML in elderly patients can be achieved in the outpatient setting. The data suggests a surprising efficacy for this strategy, with a remission rate comparable to that reported using standard induction chemotherapy but with a potentially favorable toxicity profile. A prospective study is now underway to further evaluate this protocol. Disclosures: Arthur: AMGEN: Honoraria.

Author(s):  
Michael Heuser ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
...  

AbstractThis analysis from the phase II BRIGHT AML 1003 trial reports the long-term efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized (2:1) patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (de novo, n = 38; secondary acute myeloid leukemia, n = 40) or LDAC alone (de novo, n = 18; secondary acute myeloid leukemia, n = 20). At the time of analysis, 90% of patients had died, with the longest follow-up since randomization 36 months. The combination of glasdegib and LDAC conferred superior overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone; hazard ratio (HR) 0.495; (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.325–0.752); p = 0.0004; median OS was 8.3 versus 4.3 months. Improvement in OS was consistent across cytogenetic risk groups. In a post-hoc subgroup analysis, a survival trend with glasdegib + LDAC was observed in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.720; 95% CI 0.395–1.312; p = 0.14; median OS 6.6 vs 4.3 months) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.287; 95% CI 0.151–0.548; p < 0.0001; median OS 9.1 vs 4.1 months). The incidence of adverse events in the glasdegib + LDAC arm decreased after 90 days’ therapy: 83.7% versus 98.7% during the first 90 days. Glasdegib + LDAC versus LDAC alone continued to demonstrate superior OS in patients with acute myeloid leukemia; the clinical benefit with glasdegib + LDAC was particularly prominent in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01546038.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7067-7067
Author(s):  
S. Qian ◽  
J. Li ◽  
S. Zhang

7067 Background: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) protocol in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: A total of fifty-two elderly patients were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients were male, and 24 were female, with ages ranging from 60 to 81 years (median, 65 years). Complete remission (CR) had not been achieved in five patients after 2 courses of a standard induction regimen including daunorubicin and cytarabine or an equivalent anthracycline-based regimen. Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 40 patients, and unfavourable cytogenetic aberrations were showed in 10 patients. All patients were treated with CAG regimen including low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 per 12 hours, days 1 to 14), aclarubicin (10 mg per day, days 1 to 8), and G-CSF priming (200 μg/m2 per day, days 1 to 14). Results: The overall response rate was 69.2%, and 29 of 52 (55.8%) patients achieved CR, including 23 of 35 (65.8%) patients with previously untreated AML, 6 of 17 (35.2% ) patients with refractory, relapsed and secondary AML, 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients aged over 70 years, 4 of 10 (40.0%) patients with unfavourable cytogenetic aberrations. The early death rate was 7.6%. The median overall survival duration 14 months. Myelosuppression was mild to moderate, severe nonhematologic toxicity was not observed. Conclusions: CAG priming regimen as the induction therapy is well tolerable and effective in elderly patients with AML. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 867-867
Author(s):  
Gesine Bug ◽  
Steffen Koschmieder ◽  
S. Wiebe ◽  
Gerd Heil ◽  
Carla Delfs ◽  
...  

Abstract Treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by a low complete remission (CR) rate of less than 50% and short remission duration with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of less than one year (Rowe et al., Blood 2004). Sensitization of leukemic cells with growth factors may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in AML patients. Aims of this randomized prospective, oligocenter study were 1) to assess whether induction chemotherapy given simultaneously with and followed by G-CSF (G-CSFpriming) was superior to G-CSF following induction (G-CSFpost) with regard to CR rate and DFS in pts aged older than 60 yrs with previously untreated de novo and secondary AML and 2) to examine the feasibility of an early consolidation therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as late consolidation. Between 01/00 and 04/04, a total of 116 eligible patients (median age 67 yrs) were randomly assigned to receive G-CSFpriming (n=57) or G-CSFpost (n=59) during two remission-induction cycles consisting of idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (IdAV) with daily application of 5μg/kg G-CSF (Neupogen®, Amgen). Pts achieving a CR received early consolidation using fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, G-CSF (mini-FlagIda) and PBSC harvest, followed by ASCT. Pts lacking PBSC due to mobilization failure were optionally treated with a second cycle of mini-FlagIda. After induction chemotherapy, 74 out of 116 pts (63.8%) achieved CR. Response was not significantly different in the G-CSFpost vs. G-CSFpriming group (67.8 vs. 59.6%), nor was recovery of neutrophils. Of 74 complete responders, 44 have relapsed and 3 died in CR. Median remission duration was 15.2 and 14.7 months in the G-CSFpost and G-CSFpriming group, resp. Median DFS was 16.5 months and the probability of DFS at 4 yrs 21.2%, with no significant difference between the treatment groups and a median follow-up of 22 months at the time of this interim analysis. Mini-FlagIda consolidation was administered to 51 out of 74 CR patients (68.9%). The number of circulating CD34+ cells was monitored in 43 patients. The probability of mobilizing at least 1x106/kg CD34+ cells was significantly lower in the G-CSFpriming compared to the G-CSFpost group with 29.4% (5/17 pts) and 59.2% (16/26 pts), resp (p<0.05). ASCT was performed in 10 pts resulting in a significantly better 4-yr DFS (55%) compared to 10 pts treated with a second course of mini-FlagIda (22%, p<0.05). The major reason for not being autografted in spite of efficient collecting of CD34+ cells was early relapse. Conclusion: In elderly pts with de novo or secondary AML, G-CSF priming did not enhance the antileukemic efficacy of induction chemotherapy and had no significant impact on overall treatment outcome compared with G-CSF administered after induction. As ASCT proved to be an effective consolidation modality for CR patients mobilizing sufficient amounts of CD34+ cells, the detrimental effect of G-CSF priming on the collection of PBSC is clinically relevant.>


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3974-3974
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Radujkovic ◽  
Sascha Dietrich ◽  
Alwin Krämer ◽  
Tilmann Bochtler ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Azacitidine (AZA) treatment has been shown to be superior to conventional care regimens including low dose cytarabine (LD-Ara-C) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with low bone marrow (BM) blast counts (20-30%). In contrast, data on efficacy of AZA in patients with blast counts exceeding 30% are scarce. Here we present a retrospective, single center analysis, comparing the efficacy and toxicity of AZA versus LD-Ara-C in AML patients with high BM blast counts (≥30%) prior to treatment. Patients and Methods Twenty-seven patients receiving AZA and 38 patients receiving LD-Ara-C met the eligibility criteria for the analysis (age ≥18 years, documented BM blast count ≥30% prior to start of treatment and administration of at least one complete therapy cycle). Patients who underwent allogeneic transplantation following AZA treatment or received stem cell support following LD-Ara-C therapy were excluded from this analysis. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of OS between the AZA and LD-Ara-C group was done using the logrank test and by Cox regression adjusting for known confounders. Results Patient (age, ECOG status) and diseases characteristics (type of AML, cytogenetics, pretreatment, number of treatment cycles) did not differ significantly between the treatment groups, except for BM blast count (median 44% vs. 60% in the AZA and LD-Ara-C group, respectively; p=0.03) and peripheral blood blast count (median 6% vs. 56% in the AZA and LD-Ara-C group, respectively; p<0.01). Response rates to AZA treatment according to international working group (IWG) criteria were low with two patients achieving a complete remission (CR) and one patient showing partial remission (PR) after AZA treatment. In the LD-Ara-C cohort no CR was observed and two patients experienced a PR. Hematologic improvement (HI) rates according to IWG criteria did not differ between both treatment groups (any type of HI 33% vs. 24% in the AZA and LD-Ara-C group, respectively; p=0.41). In both cohorts, most common non-hematologic toxicities (CTCAE grade≥3) included febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and bleedings without significant differences regarding frequencies. As expected, skin involvement was more commonly observed in the AZA group (19% vs. 3%, p=0.04). One year survival rates were only 15% (95% CI 8-22%) and 13% (95% CI 7-19%) in the AZA and LD-Ara-C group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups (HR 1.2, p=0.41). Furthermore, there was no difference in hospitalization time (total days spent in hospital during treatment per patient-year of follow-up 29.4 vs. 27.2 in the AZA and LD-Ara-C group, respectively; RR 1.07 95% CI 0.95-1.21, p=0.23). In a multivariate analysis with OS as endpoint adverse cytogenetics (HR 2.24 95% CI 1.17-4.70, p<0.02) were significantly associated with inferior survival, whereas the treatment had no impact (AZA vs. LD-Ara-C HR 1.27 95% CI 0.67-2.40, p=0.46). Conclusion In our center, treatment with AZA showed limited efficacy and no superiority to LD-Ara-C treatment in AML patients with BM blasts ≥30%. Disclosures: Dreger: Riemser Pharma : Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4341-4341
Author(s):  
Kathryn A Jackson ◽  
Glen A Kennedy ◽  
Peter Mollee ◽  
Kirk Morris

Abstract Abstract 4341 Aim Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) incidence increases with age, yet treatment of elderly patients has reduced efficacy compared with younger patients and is often poorly tolerated. We aimed to determine the outcome of elderly patients with de novo AML treated with intensive chemotherapy with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Methods All patients with de novo AML (excluding APML) aged ≥ 60 years treated with induction chemotherapy at our institutions between February 1999 and July 2011 were retrospectively identified from institutional databases. Information on cytogenetic risk, chemotherapy protocols, response to therapy, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were then determined retrospectively by review of individual medical records. Survival analyses were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results Intensive induction chemotherapy was received by 128 patients (57.7% of elderly patients diagnosed with de novo AML), including 105 patients (82.0%) treated with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) (100mg/m2 days 1–7) and 14 patients (10.9%) treated with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) (≥ 2000mg/m2/day for at least 4 days). The median age of this cohort was 67 years (range 60–83 years). Based on cytogenetic profile, 3.1% of patients had favourable, 54.7% had intermediate, and 27.3% had adverse-risk disease. Responses to 1–2 cycles of induction chemotherapy were complete remission (CR1) in 73.4% of patients, refractory disease in 14.8%, and induction death in 11.7%. 83.0% of patients who achieved CR1 received consolidation chemotherapy, incorporating SDAC in 74.4% and HiDAC in 23.1%. At a median follow-up of 22 months for survivors, intensive induction chemotherapy resulted in a median DFS of 11 months, and median OS of 13 months (Figure 1); 3 year OS for the entire cohort was 27.9%, with favourable, intermediate, and adverse risk groups having 50.0%, 31.6%, and 12.6% 3 year OS, respectively. Thirteen patients (10.2%) proceeded to allogeneic transplantation in CR1; median age was 63 years (range 60–66 years). These patients did not reach median DFS or OS; 11 (84.6%) remain alive and disease-free at a median follow-up of 27 months post-transplant (Figure 2). The elderly patients were compared to the cohort of younger patients (15–59 years) with de novo AML treated over the same time period. This analysis found that the older patients had a higher rate of adverse-risk cytogenetics (27.3% vs 16.1%, respectively; P = 0.02), refractory disease (14.8% vs 3.3%, respectively; P = 0.0002) and induction death (11.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; P = 0.03), and lower CR1 rate (73.4% vs 91.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001), DFS (median DFS 11 months vs 25 months, respectively; P = 0.0009) and OS (median OS 13 months vs 78 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). Conclusions Despite intensive chemotherapy, the majority of patients ≥ 60 years with AML have poor outcomes, with high rates of induction death, refractory disease, and relapsed AML. However, a proportion of these patients experience long-term survival. While patients selected for allogeneic transplantation in CR1 have high DFS and OS, only a minority of patients receive this therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document