Rituximab, Either As Single Agent or in Combination, Is Superior to Other Treatments in Terms of Response Rate and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients with Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4986-4986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Marin-Niebla ◽  
Monica Else ◽  
Fatima De la Cruz ◽  
Paul Batty ◽  
Eduardo Rios-Herranz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽  
Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4986 Background. Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is an uncommon indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma usually presenting with marked splenomegaly and bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB) involvement. Although splenectomy has traditionally been the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients, systemic treatment is required in cases of widespread disease, high risk from surgery, or relapse after splenectomy. There is no standard first line treatment in SMZL, but the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab has shown encouraging results in SMZL, with sustained responses. Aims. To assess, retrospectively, response to treatment, toxicity profile, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after treatment with rituximab in SMZL. Methods. Twenty-nine patients from two different centers, diagnosed with SMZL between 1982 and 2011, received one or more treatments with rituximab. Eighteen patients (62%) received rituximab alone and 20 (69%) combined with chemotherapy; thus 9 patients received each of these treatments sequentially, to improve response, with or without interim relapse. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range 37–89 years); the male:female ratio was 2:3; B symptoms were present in 12 patients; ECOG performance status was 0–2 in 28/29 patients. All presented with splenomegaly, with involvement of the BM in 27 patients, PB in 24, lymph nodes in 11 and extranodal involvement in 7 patients. Diagnosis was made according to the WHO 2008 classification by spleen histology (n=12), BM histology (n=19), PB morphology (n=12) and immunophenotype (n=13). Rituximab monotherapy was administered at 375 mg/m2/weekly x4 weeks. In combination with fludarabine-based regimens (n=14), or other regimens including CHOP (n= 6), rituximab was administered on day 1 of each cycle. Responses were assessed according to the Response Criteria Guidelines for SMZL (Matutes, Leukemia 2008). Toxicity was graded according to the CTCAE v3.0. The Fisher exact test was used to compare best responses between groups. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results. All patients responded to rituximab monotherapy and/or to a combination treatment. At least one complete response (CR) was achieved in 20/29 patients (69%). This compares with a CR in only 4/17 (24%) of these same patients after any prior therapy (p=0.005): 11 patients had received splenectomy, with or without chemotherapy and 6 had received chemotherapy only. There was no difference in the CR rate between rituximab monotherapy (71%) versus rituximab combinations (68%). The most common adverse event was grade 3–4 neutropenia (n=7, 24%). Two patients had grade 3–4 infections. Anemia (n=3) and thrombocytopenia (n=2) were grade 1–2 only. Four cases presented with histological transformation prior to rituximab, all achieving CR with rituximab combination therapy. After a median follow-up of 24 months from rituximab treatment (range 4–102 months), progression-free survival (PFS) has been evaluated in 28/29 patients (1 patient not assessed yet at the time of presenting these data). PFS was longer after rituximab (n=32 evaluable treatments), either alone or in combination, than it had been in these same patients after prior therapy (n=17 prior treatments in total) (p=0.002) (Fig 1). When we compared PFS between rituximab monotherapy (n=17) and rituximab combined with chemotherapy (n=15 combined treatments), single agent rituximab was superior to rituximab in combination (p=0.02) (Fig 2). The median overall survival was not yet reached. Survival at 2 years after rituximab was 100%. Only one death, due to lung cancer, occurred at 48 months follow-up. Conclusions. In patients with SMZL, the CR rate after rituximab, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, was significantly better than the CR rate after other prior treatments in the same patients, with manageable toxicity. Although we observed no difference in the CR rate between rituximab monotherapy or combination therapy, PFS was longer in patients receiving rituximab as single agent. Therefore, the addition of chemotherapy did not appear to add any advantage over rituximab alone in our cohort. Rituximab, with or without splenectomy, should be considered in the therapeutic scenario of SMZL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase II study of eribulin and pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS): Report of LMS cohort.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11559-11559
Author(s):  
Michael Nathenson ◽  
Edwin Choy ◽  
Neena D Carr ◽  
Hayley D Hibbard ◽  
Emanuele Mazzola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

11559 Background: Responses to single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in STS remain limited with occasional responses in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS), liposarcomas (LPS), and other sarcomas, and rare responses in leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Since cytotoxics and/or targeted therapies such as CDK4/6 inhibitors may alter the tumor microenvironment (TME) and potentiate the effect of immunotherapy, combination approaches may be needed to potentiate STS immunotherapy. The mechanism by which eribulin controls LPS may involve TME modification, and therefore it is attractive to test in combination with pembrolizumab in STS subtypes. This report summarizes the results from the LMS cohort from this ongoing trial. Methods: Pts treated with at least one prior therapy received eribulin 1.4mg/m2 (day 1, 8) and pembrolizumab 200mg (day 1), every 21 days. Pts continued therapy until progressive disease, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks, with 60% PFS at 12 weeks required to deem the combination promising. Tumor assessments (RECIST 1.1) were performed at screening and every 6 weeks thereafter. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Results: Nineteen pts with LMS were enrolled from May 2019 to Sept 2019. The median age was 62 (range 48-80). Eleven (58%) patients had uterine LMS. The median # of prior therapies was 4 (range 1-7). The median follow-up was 19.7 weeks. The PFS at 12 weeks was 42.1% (90% CI: 27.0%-65.5%), with median PFS of 11.1 weeks. Median OS was not reached during the follow-up period. There was 1 partial response, and 5 confirmed stable disease for ORR of 5.3% and CBR of 26.3%, after 12 weeks. The rate of grade 3 or higher toxicity was 68% overall, most commonly neutropenia, anemia, weight loss, diarrhea, elevations of lipase, and alkaline phosphatase. These side effects were reversible. The most common adverse events were fatigue, neutropenia, anorexia, AST increase, and nausea. Conclusions: Eribulin and pembrolizumab in LMS did not meet the predefined endpoint for efficacy. The LPS and “other STS subtype” cohorts of this trial are actively enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03899805 .

scholarly journals FAS and Subsequent Therapies in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. Rogers ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Cecile G. Dagohoy ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

We evaluated outcomes of treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and streptozocin (FAS) in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and its impact on subsequent therapy (everolimus or temozolomide). Advanced PanNET patients treated at our center from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2), streptozocin (400 mg/m2) (both IV, days 1-5) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 IV, day 1) every 28 days. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. Of 243 eligible patients, 220 were evaluable for ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Most (90%) had metastatic, nonfunctional PanNETs; 14% had prior therapy. ORR to FAS was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-48%). Median follow-up was 61 months. Median PFS was 20 (95% CI: 15-23) months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 (95% CI: 60-71) months. Cox regression analyses suggested improvement with first-line vs subsequent lines of FAS therapy. Main adverse events ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (10%) and nausea/vomiting (5.5%). Dose reductions were required in 32% of patients. Post-FAS everolimus (n=108; 68% second line) had a median PFS of 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months. Post-FAS temozolomide (n=60; 53% > fourth line) had an ORR of 13% and median PFS of 5.2 (95% CI: 4-12) months. In this largest reported cohort of PanNETs treated with chemotherapy, FAS demonstrated activity without significant safety concerns. FAS did not appear to affect subsequent PFS with everolimus; this sequence is being evaluated prospectively. Responses were noted with subsequent temozolomide-based regimens although PFS was possibly limited by line of therapy.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

scholarly journals Impact of Early Switching to Nilotinib As Second Line TKI in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Were Intolerant to, Suboptimal to and Failed Imatinib: The Thai Multi-Centered Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267
Author(s):  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction : To date, the ELN recommendation and NCCN guidelines are the principle mile stones to follow up the treatment response and to make the decision of TKIs switching. However, in real life practice, many factors influence changing the real switching date from the date had an indication. This study aims to analyze the impact of early switching to second line TKI, nilotinib, in real life practice, for the CML patients who failed, had sub-optimal response or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods : This prospective study was conducted through 7 medical centers in Thailand between 1st of September 2009 and 31st of August 2011. Adult CML patients of age ≥ 18 years old, in chronic and accelerated phase, who had failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib, based on ELN 2009 guideline, were included and were eligible with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Prospective data collection for 24 months of each patient was performed. The main objective was to identify the impact of early switching to nilotinib on major molecular response (MMR). The other objectives were to observe the efficacy of nilotinib including overall survival, progression free survival and the safety. The survival results were presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves. For the comparison of the treatment groups, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the corresponding log-rank test for equality of survivor functions across treatment group was applied. Results : The final 108 cases were analysed. The median age was 47 (17-79) years with the proportion of male to female of 1.4:1 respectively. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). The median duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching was 3.1 months (0-62.8 months) with 50% changing less than 3 months, 26.9% between 3 months and 12 months, and 23.1% changing longer than 12 months. The indication of switching included 63.6% failure to imatinib, 29% intolerance to imatinib and 7.4% suboptimal to imatinib. On the nilotinib switching, 70.4% completed 24 months follow-up, and 29.6% discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Evaluation was made every 3 months based on 2009 ELN recommendation. At 3 months, 57%, 20%, and 8% of the patients achieved CHR, CCyR and MMR, respectively. Those who did not achieve CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR. All CML achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had better outcome than imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance groups. A preliminary analysis of BCR-ABL mutation was performed on 90 cases, and mutations were found on 21 cases. Two of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation. There was one case with initial G250E mutation developing T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, one case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year progression-free survival and were 98.9% and 96.9% (figure 1 and 2), respectively. The interquatile analysis was done to identify the groups of cumulative MMR according to the duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching to nilotinib. The patients who switched to nilotinib within 12 months after date of indication could have a greater chance to achieved MMR than those who switched treatment later than 12 months (p(log-rank) = 0.002) (figure 3). Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events, However, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%) and leucopenia (4%), and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Conclusions : Nilotinib, as a second line treatment showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. However, the patients will have a greater chance to achieve MMR if they switched to nilotinib within 12 months after the date of indication for changing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Combined Treatment of Bortezomib, Continuous Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Followed By One Year of Maintenance Treatment for Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4733-4733
Author(s):  
Esther GM Waal de ◽  
Linda Munck de ◽  
Gerhard Woolthuis ◽  
Annet velden Van Der ◽  
Yvonne Tromp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction: Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose, also called metronomic scheduling, might be an effective manner to treat patients with relapsing myeloma. In particular if the used agents attack the malignant clone in an alternative manner. Therefore we used the combination of bortezomib, dexametasone and daily low dose of oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen followed by one year of maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Methods: Relapsing myeloma patients, bortezomib naïve, were treated with three cycles of 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib at day 1, 4, 8 and 11, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily, and 20 mg dexamethasone at day 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 followed by three cycles of bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 15 and 2), cyclophosphamide (50 mg) daily and dexamethasone (20 mg) at day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every two weeks and daily dose of 50 mg cyclophosphamide for one year was applied to patients in partial or complete remission. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re-induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression free and overall survival. Results: 59 patients with relapsing multiple myeloma were included of whom 69% were in first relapse (Table 1). The upfront treatment consisted mainly of thalidomide-based and vincristine-based chemotherapy and 40% of the patients have been treated with an autologous stem cell transplantation. All 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy could be given in 49% of the patients. Premature discontinuation before starting maintenance therapy was due to toxicity (31%), progressive disease (7%), death (7%) or other reasons (6%). Myelosuppression was the most common side effect with WHO grade 3-4 in 31% of the patients. Neuropathy grade 3-4 was observed in 16% of patients, partially due to the fact that bortezomib was given intravenously during the first 2 yrs of the protocol which included 76% of the patients. Maintenance therapy was started in 47% of the patients with a median duration of 7.3 months (range 0.36.-13.4). Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 25% of the patients including infections (n=3) and myelosuppression (n=3) which did not resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Median follow up time was 29 months with an overall response of 62%, and a very good partial response (VGPR), complete remission (CR) in 21% and 7% of the patients respectively. During the maintenance phase an improvement in responsiveness was observed in 25% of the patients. The CR rate increased with 9% to a total of 16%. VGPR rate was 20% and 16% of the patient had a PR. At end of the maintenance therapy 50% of patients started with maintenance had stable disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 17.2 months (range 0.13 – 43.5) as depicted in figure 1. and the median overall survival was 21.6 months (range 0.46-54.4, figure 2). During follow up 33 % of the patients died due to progression of MM. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that combination therapy with bortezomib, continuous low dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding a year of maintenance was feasible with limited side effects and an increase in CR rate. Table 1: patient characteristics Patients (%) Age, mean (min,max) 69 (46-86) Sex Male 56 Female 44 Relapse number First relapse 75 Second relapse 20 Third relapse 5 Performance status 0 65 1 29 2 5 M-protein heavy chain IgA 18 IgG 65 Light chain disease 18 Polyneuropathy No 61 Yes 39 Figure 1: Progression free survival Figure 1:. Progression free survival Figure 2: Overall survival Figure 2:. Overall survival Disclosures Waal de: Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Munck de:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Woolthuis:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. velden Van Der:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Tromp:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hoogendoorn:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Vellenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hovenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding.

Umbralisib monotherapy demonstrates efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: A multicenter, open label, registration directed phase II study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7506-7506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Hale Fowler ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Ewa Lech-Maranda ◽  
Nilanjan Ghosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Anti Cd20

7506 Background: Rituximab (RTX) alone or with chemo has substantially improved outcomes for patients (pts) with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), but relapse is common and not all pts are candidates for or respond to current salvage therapies. Umbralisib is a novel, next-gen PI3Kδ inhibitor with unique inhibition of casein kinase-1ε (CK1ε) and a differentiated tolerability profile compared to earlier PI3Kδ inhibitors (Burris et al, 2018). This registration-directed study evaluates the efficacy and safety of umbralisib in pts with rel/ref (R/R) MZL. Methods: Pts had histologically confirmed MZL, ECOG PS ≤2, and ≥1 prior therapy including ≥1 anti-CD20 mAb-containing regimen. Pts received umbralisib 800 mg orally once daily until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response (ORR) as assessed by independent review (IRC) per 2007 IWG criteria. ORR by investigator assessment is reported here, and ORR by IRC is forthcoming. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, and safety. Results: 69 pts were enrolled; we report on the first 38 who are eligible for at least 6 months (mos) of follow-up as of the data cutoff. Among the 38 pts: extranodal (n = 23), nodal (n = 8), and splenic (n = 7). Median age was 67 years (range, 34-81). Median # of prior systemic therapies was 2 (range, 1-5). Seven pts (18%) had monotherapy RTX only, and 26 (68%) had at least one anti-CD20 mAb-containing chemoimmunotherapy. Median follow-up was 9.6 mos. ORR was 55% (4 CRs and 17 PRs). Eleven pts (29%) had stable disease (SD) of which 6 of these SD pts remain on study ranging from 7-12+ mos. The clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) was 84%, and 91% of pts with at least 1 post-baseline assessment experienced tumor reductions. Median time to initial response was 2.7 mos, while median DOR was not reached (95% CI: 8.4-NR). The 12-month PFS was 71%. The most common all causality (≥20%) adverse events (AE) of any grade included: diarrhea (45%), nausea (29%), fatigue (26%), headache (26%), cough (24%), and decreased appetite (21%). The most common Grade 3/4 events were neutropenia (8%), febrile neutropenia (5%), and diarrhea (5%). As of the cutoff date 58% continue treatment. Conclusions: PI3Kδ inhibition with single-agent umbralisib is active and well tolerated in pts with R/R MZL, achieving durable responses with chemotherapy-free therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02793583.

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A therapeutic option to increase overall survival?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Cedric Pobel ◽  
Edouard Auclin ◽  
Diego Teyssonneau ◽  
Brigitte Laguerre ◽  
Mathilde Cancel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

97 Background: Cabazitaxel rechallenge could be a more efficient therapy with an acceptable toxicity than docetaxel in the treatment of patients with a metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients from 9 centers in France who received 3 lines or more of cabazitaxel from February 2012 to July 2020. Cabazitaxel schedule differed between patients: 25 mg/m2 q3w, 20 mg/m2 q3w, 16 mg/m2 q2w or 10 mg/m2 weekly. Efficacy was assessed by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from each cabazitaxel line start. Only toxicities grade ≥ 3 were reported. Results: Twenty-two patients were included. The median follow-up from mCRPC was 94.7 months, median age at initial diagnosis was 59.5 years old, median ISUP score at diagnosis was 4 and median PSA at diagnosis was 55 ng/ml. Median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first-line, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 for subsequent rechallenges. Median OS from mCRPC diagnosis was 105 months. Median PFS from cabazitaxel line start was 11.8 months at first use, 9.6 for first rechallenge and 5.6 in second rechallenge (table). Only one case of febrile neutropenia and 6 events of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were reported. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge could efficiently extend OS with manageable toxicities for patients. Even if anti-PARP therapy and immunotherapy are promising treatments, cabazitaxel rechallenge could be also a relevant therapeutic option for long responder patients. Specific biomarkers should be explored to predict the efficacy of cabazitaxel rechallenge. [Table: see text]

Cladribine (2-CDA) Plus Sequential Rituximab in Newly Diagnosed Disseminated Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphomas. A Phase II Study.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2761-2761
Author(s):  
Gaetano Corazzelli ◽  
Gaetana Capobianco ◽  
Filippo Russo ◽  
Oreste Villani ◽  
Patrizia Vassallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Multiple extranodal localizations, nodal spreading and bone marrow (BM) involvement have been associated with shorter overall and event-free survival in Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma (EMZL). No optimal treatment has yet been defined and, in this setting, Rituximab has demonstrated only moderate single agent activity while the role of purine analogs is still controversial, although promising in terms of objective response rate. In order to verify a potential synergy of these agents we conducted a prospective phase II trial evaluating a sequential treatment with 2-CDA, a purine nucleoside analog with proapoptotic and cytotoxic activity on both proliferating and quiescent lymphoid cells, and Rituximab in patients (pts) with untreated disseminated EMZL. Patients and methods: Pts with histologically confirmed MZL, ECOG < 2 and Stage IV disease were enrolled. 2-CDA was administered at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg on 5 consecutive days as a 2-hour infusion, every 4 weeks for 6 courses on outpatient basis. Thereafter, 4 doses of Rituximab (375 mg/m2, i.v., every 2 weeks) were delivered. Prophylaxis with TMP-SMX was required and filgrastim introduced if grade 3–4 neutropenia had occurred. Responses were evaluated after the 4th course of 2-CDA and at the end of the entire program. Results: Twenty-three pts (median age 67 yrs; r 34–81) with advanced [multiple extranodal site (n=16), BM (n=15), distant/diffuse nodal involvement (n=14), orbit (n=8), multicentric skin (n=3), gastric (n=4), leukemic (n=2), lung and pleura (n=3), salivary glands (n=3), Waldeyer’s ring (n= 1), breast (n=1)] EMZL were accrued. B symptoms were present in 4 pts, abnormal LDH in 6. No pts had been irradiated and only 2 had received surgical resection due to emergency (ileum) and diagnostic (lung) procedures. All pts completed treatment program and were evaluable for response. The median number of delivered courses of 2-CDA was 6 (r 3–6). The overall response rate was 91 % [after the 4th course: CR=4, CRu=11, PR=6; at the end of treatment (i.e. including Rituximab): CR= 18 (78%), PR=3 (13%)]. Interestingly, a histological CR was achieved in 13 out of 15 pts with BM involvement (81%). Only 2 pts, with B symptoms at presentation, had a therapeutical diversion at the 3rd and 4th course due to minor response and persisting symptomatic disease. Extrahematological toxicity was negligible. CTCAE Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 9 and 5 (22%) pts, respectively and febrile neutropenia occurred in 6 pts (26%). Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia and lymphocytopenia developed in 4 (17%) and 3 (13%) patients, respectively. Delayed grade 3 leuko- and thrombocytopenia occurred two months after 2-CDA withdrawal in three pts and slowly recovered in the following 6–8 weeks. No late opportunistic infection, nor disease recurrence have to date occurred. Failure free survival was 86 % at median follow up of 18 months (range, 4–34). Conclusions: Our prospective study shows that 2-CDA plus sequential Rituximab represents an effective strategy for the upfront treatment of disseminated EMZL. It is feasible in outpatient setting, and associated with favorable early and late toxicity profiles. While a longer follow-up will assess its impact on disease natural history, our results show for the first time that 2-CDA plus sequential rituximab may achieve very high CR rates even in poor prognosis pts with extragastric and widespread EMZL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document