Incidence, Treatment, and Consequences of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4232-4232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Weycker ◽  
Richard Barron ◽  
Alex Kartashov ◽  
Jason C. Legg ◽  
Gary H. Lyman

Abstract Abstract 4232 Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a life-threatening side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The incidence and consequences of FN requiring inpatient care have been evaluated using healthcare claims or hospital administrative databases (Kuderer et al, Cancer 2006; Caggiano et al, Cancer 2005; Lyman et al, Eur J Cancer 1998). These sources did not include absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) and body temperature; thus the accuracy of case-ascertainment methods and findings is unknown. Moreover, none of these studies considered FN managed in the outpatient setting. Because some of these limitations may be overcome using electronic health records (EHR), a new study was undertaken. Methods: Data were obtained from Humedica's National EHR-Derived Longitudinal Patient-Level Database (2007–2010), which includes comprehensive point-of-care information from EHR and administrative data stores across the continuum of care for ∼5 million patients. The study population included adult patients who initiated 1 or more new courses of myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of a solid tumor or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). For each patient, each chemotherapy course and each cycle within each course was identified. FN was identified on a cycle-specific basis based on ANC <1.0 × 109/L and evidence of infection or fever (ie, temperature ≥38.3°C, diagnosis, or antibiotic use); inpatient diagnosis of neutropenia, fever, or infection; outpatient diagnosis of neutropenia and antibiotic use; or mention of FN in physician notes. Episodes of FN were categorized as inpatient or outpatient based on initial locus of care. Consequences of FN included hospital length of stay and mortality (inpatient cases only) and number of FN-related outpatient management visits. Means, percentages, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported below. Results: The study population included 2131 patients who received 2323 courses and 8999 cycles of chemotherapy. About 50% of patients were aged ≥65 years, and more patients were female (59.7%). The most common cancers were breast (23.0%), lung (19.9%), genitourinary (17.5%), NHL (10.7%), and colorectal (10.4%). The most common chemotherapy regimens were docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC; 33.9% of breast cancer patients); paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC; 42.9% of lung cancer and 51.1% of genitourinary cancer patients); cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone (CHOP; 42.0% of NHL patients); and fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 60.5% of colorectal cancer patients). Among the 2131 patients in the study population, 401 patients experienced a total of 458 FN events, which occurred most frequently (41.0%) in cycle 1. Among the 2323 chemotherapy courses identified, the FN risk was 16.8% (95% CI: 15.3, 18.4). FN risk was highest in cycle 1 (8.1%; 95% CI: 7.1, 9.3) and cycle 2 (4.9%; 95% CI: 3.9, 6.0). Among the 8999 cycles of chemotherapy, 83.2% of FN events were initially treated in the inpatient setting and 16.8% were initially treated in the outpatient setting. Of events initially treated in the outpatient setting, 3.9% required subsequent hospitalization. Among FN events initially treated in the inpatient setting, mean hospital length of stay was 8.4 (95% CI: 7.7, 9.1) days, and inpatient mortality was 8.1% (95% CI: 5.8, 11.1). Among FN events initially treated in the outpatient setting, the mean total number of FN-related outpatient management visits was 2.6 (95% CI: 2.1, 3.1); most encounters were in the physician's office (69.2%) or emergency department (26.9%). Conclusions: Nearly 1 in 5 patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy experienced FN. Most FN events (83.8%) required hospitalization either for initial treatment or subsequent to outpatient treatment, and mean hospital length of stay was greater than 8 days. Outpatient care alone was used to successfully treat 16.2% of FN events. Outpatient FN events required 2.6 outpatient management visits, most of which were in the physician's office. Disclosures: Weycker: Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Barron:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kartashov:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Legg:Amgen Inc. : Employment, Equity Ownership. Lyman:Amgen Inc: Research Funding.

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-454
Author(s):  
Kyawzaw Lin ◽  
Sandar Linn ◽  
Daryl Ramai ◽  
Aung Naing Lin ◽  
Tania Jasmine ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482097335
Author(s):  
Melinda Wang ◽  
Julian Huang ◽  
Anees B. Chagpar

Background While obesity is thought to increase complication rates in general surgery procedures, its effect in mastectomy patients remains to be fully elucidated. We sought to determine if obesity is associated with a higher complication rate and length of stay after mastectomy, independent of clinicopathologic and treatment factors. Methods Medical records of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30) and nonobese (BMI < 30) categories and compared using nonparametric statistical analyses. Results Of 927 patients, 291 (31.2%) were obese. Obese patients had more complications (26.5% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.033) and a greater number of complications per patient ( P = 0.025) than nonobese patients. They were more likely to have infections (10.7% vs. 5.7%, P = .009), flap thrombosis/necrosis (5.5% vs. 2.4%, P = .018), and skin breakdown/wound complications (8.6% vs. 4.6%, P = .022). Additionally, obese patients had longer hospital length of stay (LOS; LOS > 2 days: 77.7% vs. 65.2%, P < .001). Controlling for potential confounders, obesity remained associated with a higher rate of thrombosis/necrosis of flap (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-5.08; P = .047) and LOS ≥ 2 days (OR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.23-2.69; P = .003). Conclusion Obese breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy have more thrombosis/necrosis of flap and a longer hospital LOS than nonobese patients, regardless of other comorbidities and clinicopathologic/treatment factors.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Phaedon Dimitrios Zavras ◽  
Vikas Mehta ◽  
Sanjay Goel ◽  
Kith Pradhan ◽  
Henny H. Billett

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Increased rates of thromboembolism (TE) have been reported in patients with COVID-19, even without prior predisposition to thrombosis. Cancer patients are already predisposed to a hypercoagulable state. This study was designed to assess the TE incidence in COVID-19+ patients with active cancer and its impact on survival. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data from cancer patients with documented COVID-19 during the dates March 15th–April 10th, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Active cancer was defined as disease treated within the past year. Diagnosis and evaluation of thrombosis were done at the clinicians’ discretion. All imaging studies’ reports within 30 days of the COVID-19 positive test were reviewed for identification of new arterial and/or venous TE. Patients were followed for 30 days from the date of COVID-19+ test for development of TE, hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 90 patients, 11 (12.2%) were found to have 13 new TE within 30 days of COVID-19+ test: 8 (8.9%) arterial and 5 (5.6%) venous. Arterial TE was primarily new strokes and/or microvascular cerebral disease (7) with 1 splenic infarct. Venous TE was superficial (1) and deep (3) venous thromboses with 1 pulmonary embolism. Peak D-dimer (DD) values were numerically higher in the TE group versus those with no TE, median peak DD, 7.7 versus 3.2 μg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.25. Kidney disease was more frequent among patients with TE (72.7%) versus those without TE (31.6%), <i>p</i> = 0.02. Prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) in the inpatient setting was more common among those without TE, any AC, TE versus no TE, 9.1% versus 79.0%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001. Only 1 patient on enoxaparin prophylaxis developed TE. Mortality was higher in the TE group than in those without TE (hazard ratio: 2.6; 95% CI [1.2–5.6], <i>p</i> = 0.009). Cancer type, presence of metastases, administration of prior chemotherapy, patient setting (inpatient, intensive care unit, outpatient, emergency department visit), LOS, and ventilation did not correlate with increased incidence of TE. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Cancer patients with COVID-19 have high overall TE rates with a significant incidence of arterial events. TE was associated with worse survival outcomes.


2019 ◽  
pp. 001857871986764
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Buckley ◽  
Ben Turner ◽  
Dalton Walsh ◽  
Meghan J. Garrett ◽  
Vishal N. Ooka

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of rebound hypotension in patients with septic shock requiring both norepinephrine and vasopressin infusions once discontinuation of 1 of these agents is warranted. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 3 hospitals within a single health system between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. The study population included adults, 18 years and older, diagnosed with septic shock and requiring concurrent infusions of norepinephrine and vasopressin. The primary outcome evaluated the incidence of rebound hypotension within 24 hours after the first vasopressor was discontinued. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, total vasopressor duration, and the time to rebound hypotension after first vasopressor discontinuation. Results: A total of 69 patients were included in the study, 38 in the vasopressin discontinued first group and 31 in the norepinephrine discontinued first group. Rebound hypotension occurred in 82% of patients in the vasopressin discontinued first group compared with 48% in the norepinephrine discontinued first group ( P = .004). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes, including intensive care unit or hospital length of stay, total vasopressor duration, or the time to rebound hypotension. Conclusions: Discontinuation of norepinephrine before vasopressin may lead to less incidence of rebound hypotension in patients with septic shock who require concurrent norepinephrine and vasopressin infusions. Similar to previous studies, this study found no difference in secondary outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5918-5918
Author(s):  
Ariela L. Marshall ◽  
Adam C Bartley ◽  
Aneel A. Ashrani ◽  
Wilson I Gonsalves ◽  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) contributes to significant morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Though male sex is a known risk factor for recurrent VTE, there is a paucity of literature regarding sex-based sociodemographic differences as well as differences in VTE outcomes including hospital length of stay and mortality rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2012-2013. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older and primary discharge diagnosis of VTE Sociodemographic features and medical comorbidities were analyzed, as were hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality rates. Results: 107,896 patients in the NIS, representing a national estimate of 539,480 patients hospitalized for VTE between 2012 and 2013, met inclusion criteria. 53% were female and 47% were male. Mean age was 63 years and on average women were older than men (65 years versus 62 years, p<0.001). There were significant differences between men and women with respect to race, primary insurance payor, and VTE location as well as medical comorbidities (Table 1). Median overall length of stay (LOS) was 4 days and in-hospital mortality rates were 2.1%. Female sex was associated with a small but significantly longer hospital LOS (RR 1.04, CI 1.03-1.05, p<0.001) which was also seen in subgroup analyses of lower extremity DVT (RR 1.05, CI 1.03-1.06, p<0.001) and pulmonary embolism (RR 1.03, CI 1.02-1.05, p<0.001) but not upper extremity (RR 1.04, CI 0.96-1.12, p=0.36). There were no significant sex-based differences in in-hospital mortality (2.2% in women versus 2.1% in men, p=0.15). In a multivariate model correcting for sociodemographic differences and medical comorbidities, there were no significant differences between women and men with respect to hospital LOS or in-hospital mortality (Table 2). Conclusion: We used data from the NIS to study a large number of patients hospitalized for VTE, and identified several sex-based disparities in sociodemographic factors and location of VTE. However, in a multivariable analysis correcting for these factors, sex was not associated with significant differences in hospital LOS or inpatient mortality rates. Disclosures Kapoor: Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document