A Randomised Dose De-Escalation Safety Study of Oral Fludarabine, ±Oral Cyclophosphamide and Intravenous Rituximab (OFOCIR) As First-Line Therapy of Fit Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) Aged ≥65 Years – End of Recruitment Analysis of Response and Toxicity of the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) and CLL Australian Research Consortium (CLLARC) CLL5 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 436-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P Mulligan ◽  
Devinder S Gill ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
William E. P. Renwick ◽  
Rosemary Harrup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Cohort ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 436 Background: Combination immunochemotherapy with fludarabine (F), cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) gave superior progression free and overall survival compared to FC in the CLL8 Study. The median age in CLL8 was 61 years compared to a median age for overall CLL patients of 72 years. There is ongoing debate regarding the tolerability and safety of FCR in elderly patients, and what are the most appropriate criteria for selection of therapy. Methods: Previously untreated patients with progressive CLL aged ≥65 were randomised to one of three treatment regimens FR5, FCR3 and FCR5 as follows: (i) F 24mg/m2 po D1-5 + R (375 mg/m2 C1, 500mg/m2 C2-6) iv D1 (FR5), (ii) F 24mg/m2 po and C 150mg/m2 po D1-3 + R iv D1 (FCR3) or (iii) F 24mg/m2 po + C 150mg/m2po D1-5 + R iv D1 (FCR5), all given at 4 weekly intervals for an intended 6 cycles. The dosage of FCR5 is equivalent to standard 3 day IV FCR in the CLL8 Study. Patients were administered their therapy arm with no dose reduction but fludarabine dose was reduced if the eGFR was 50–69ml/min. Therapy was delayed up to 2 weeks if there was grade 3 or 4 toxicity, and if unresolved after 2 weeks, patients were taken off study. If toxicity resolved to grade 2 or less, therapy proceeded. Results: Recruitment of all 120 randomised patients was completed in July 2012. An analysis was performed with a cut-off date of 5 May, 2012 at which time there were 117 of 120 recruited from 29 centres in Australia and New Zealand. Median age was 71.7 (range 65–83) years. Binet stage at registration was progressive A – 20 (17.1%), B – 55 (47.0%) and C – 42 (35.9%). Response data are shown in table 1 for the total patient cohort - no analysis has been performed to date by treatment arm. Analysis of grade 3 and 4 toxicity events by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score and age are shown in Tables 2 and 3 with data available at the cut-off date. Conclusions: Oral F(C)R therapy appears generally safe and well tolerated in CLL patients aged ≥65 years requiring first-line treatment according to data available at end of recruitment. Using stringent stopping criteria with delay of 2 weeks for recovery of grade 3 or 4 toxicity but no dose reduction, ∼40% of patients stop early due to toxicity, intercurrent illness or patient choice. Based on the 66 patients with completed Final Pathological Staging 2 months after end of therapy, response rates appear high with an overall response rate (ORR) of 92.3%. For this relatively fit elderly patient cohort, neither a CIRS score of 0 to 6, nor age predicted for grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Disclosures: Mulligan: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Toxicity Is Not Associated with Age or Comorbidity Score in a Randomised Study of Oral Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide and IV Rituximab (FCR) As First-Line Therapy of Fit, Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4695-4695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Mulligan ◽  
Devinder Gill ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
William E. P. Renwick ◽  
Maya Latimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Early Stopping ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Skin Allergy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND Fludarabine (F), cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) gave superior progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus (vs) FC in the CLL8 Study. The median age in CLL8 was 61 years compared to 72 years for CLL overall. There has been considerable debate regarding the tolerability and toxicity of FCR based therapy in older patients (pts) and those with comorbidities. METHODS Previously untreated fit pts with progressive CLL aged ≥65 were randomised to one of 3 therapy arms: (i) FR5: F 24mg/m2 po D1-5 + R iv D1 (375mg/m2 cycle 1, 500mg/m2 cycles 2-6), (ii) FCR3: F 24mg/m2 po and C 150mg/m2 po D1-3 + R iv D1 or (iii) FCR5: F 24mg/m2 po+ C 150mg/m2 po D1-5 + R iv D1 all at 4 weekly intervals for an intended 6 cycles. Cycles could be delayed up to 2 weeks for grade 3+ toxicity, and if unresolved by 2 weeks, pts were taken off study. Fitness was assessed using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score with eligibility restricted to CIRS ≤6. RESULTS Recruitment of 120 pts was completed in July 2012. 117 fulfilled eligibility and 1 had no treatment or follow-up reducing the cohort to 116. Median age was 71 (range 65-82) years (yrs) with 78 males (67%) and 39 females (33%). Patient registration by age was 65-69 yrs – 44, 70-74 yrs – 44, 75-79 yrs – 20 and 80-84 yrs – 8 pts, and by CIRS score was 0-2 – 61, 3-4 – 38, 5-6 – 17 pts. Toxicity data by age and CIRS score are shown in tables 1 and 2 respectively. All 6 protocol cycles were completed in 69% but less on FCR5 44% vs FR5 89% and FCR3 76% (p<0.001). Selected toxicity and early stopping rates in table 3. Overall response and toxicity are presented separately. Table 1:Grade 3+ Adverse Events by AgeAgeTotal65-6970-7475-7980-84(n=116)(N=44)(N=44)(N=20)(N=8)Hematological28 (64%)29 (66%)10 (50%)3 (38%)70 (60%)Neutropenia24 (55%)21 (48%)10 (50%)3 (38%)58 (50%)Thrombocytopenia9 (20%)9 (20%)1 (5%)0 (0%)19 (16%)Anaemia7 (16%)6 (14%)2 (10%)0 (0%)15 (13%)Haemolytic Anaemia1 (2%)2 (5%)1 (5%)1 (12%)5 (4%)Febrile Neutropenia / Infection9 (20%)5 (11%)8 (40%)2 (25%)24 (21%)Skin/Allergy/Fatigue/hypersensitivity3 (7%)2 (5%)4 (20%)2 (25%)11 (9%)Other (Card / resp / neuro / metabolic)13 (30%)10 (23%)3 (15%)1 (12%)27 (23%)At least 1 grade 3+ AE37 (84%)34 (77%)13 (65%)6 (75%)90 (78%) There was no statistically significant difference by age (p=0.429). Table 2:Grade 3+ Adverse Events by CIRS scoreCIRS scoreTotal0-23-45-6(n=116)(N=61)(N=38)(N=17)Hematological38 (62%)21 (55%)11 (65%)70 (60%)Neutropenia31 (51%)16 (42%)11 (65%)58 (50%)Thrombocytopenia11 (18%)6 (16%)2 (12%)19 (16%)Anaemia7 (11%)5 (13%)3 (18%)15 (13%)Haemolytic Anaemia1 (2%)4 (11%)0 (0%)5 (4%)Febrile Neutropenia / Infection11 (18%)9 (24%)4 (24%)24 (21%)Skin/Allergy/Fatigue/hypersensitivity6 (10%)4 (11%)1 (6%)11 (9%)Other (Card / resp / neuro / metabolic)12 (20%)9 (24%)6 (35%)27 (23%)At least 1 grade 3+ AE78 (79%)27 (71%)15 (88%)90 (78%) There was no statistically significant difference by CIRS score (p=0.355). Table 3:Abbreviated Grade 3+ Adverse Events by Treatment ArmTreatment armTotal (n=116)FR5 (N=37)FCR3 (N=41)FCR5 (N=38)Hematological15 (41% )26 (63% )29 (76% )70 (60%)At least 1 grade 3+ AE21 (57%)34 (83%)35 (92%)90 (78%)Early cessation due to toxicity2 (5.6%)1 (2.4%)13 (34%)16 (14%) Early cessation due to toxicity was significantly more common with FCR5 (p<0.001). However, of the 13 patients on FCR5 arm that stopped early due to toxicity, there was no difference by age or CIRS score: by age, 5 were 65-69 yrs, 3 were 70-74 yrs, 4 were 75-79 yrs and 1 was 80-84 yrs and by CIRS score, 3 were 0-2, 6 were 3-4 and 4 were 5-6. CONCLUSIONS Final analysis in this randomised dose de-escalation study shows oral FCR therapy is generally safe and well tolerated in CLL pts aged ≥65 years requiring first-line treatment, when early stopping is utilised if prolonged toxicity occurs. Early cessation due to toxicity was more common with full dose FCR5, but not associated with age or CIRS score within this arm. Overall in this relatively fit elderly CLL cohort, neither age nor CIRS score were associated with toxicity, or early cessation of therapy due to toxicity. The results highlight the difficulty of predicting toxicity based on age and comorbidity in elderly CLL pts. Disclosures Mulligan: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gill:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Turner:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Renwick:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Latimer:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Mackinlay:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Berkahn:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Simpson:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Forsyth:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Harrup:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Kuss:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

High-Dose Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone As First-Line Treatment in Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4258-4258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Sujitha Yadlapati ◽  
Lyubov Neglyad ◽  
Jennifer Bourke ◽  
David Jayabalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Maximum Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Background: Carfilzomib (Cfz) is approved for use in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) at a dose of 27mg/m2 after escalation from 20mg/m2. The response rate for Cfz and dexamethasone (dex) as first-line therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is unknown. Higher doses of Cfz have been shown to enhance overall response in RRMM (Lendvai 2014); the presence of a dose-response relationship of Cfz for first-line therapy in untreated MM has not been evaluated. A protocol of Cfz-Dex induction at two dosing levels, followed by BiRd (Clarithromycin 500mg PO BID, Lenalidomide (Len) 25mg for 21/28 days, Dex 40mg weekly) consolidation, and thereafter Len (10mg 12/28 days) maintenance, evaluated response and safety by Cfz dose level in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM. The ORR and safety data for Cfz-Dex induction stratified by Cfz dose is reported. Methods: 70 patients with untreated MM were enrolled in a phase 2 study of Cfz-dex. Cfz-dex is: Cfz IV on D1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of a 28-day cycle at a dose of 20mg/m2 on days 1, 2 of cycle 1 and 45mg/m2 thereafter and Dex 40mg on D1, 8, 15, 22. After the first 26 pts were enrolled, the protocol was amended to increase the Cfz from 45 to 56mg/m2. Screening echocardiogram and pulmonary function testing were performed. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured with each cycle. Cfz-dex was continued until plateau in disease response (unchanged M-protein for 2 cycles). Elective stem cell collection was then performed in transplant eligible pts. This was followed by BiRd until 2nd response plateau, and then by LEN maintenance. Disease response evaluation was performed monthly with serum and urine protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain analysis; bone marrow biopsy with skeletal imaging was used to confirm MM progression or complete response (CR). Cytogenetic testing was performed on CD138-selected cells. Results: 25 pts received Cfz-Dex at 45 mg/m2 and 44 (out of 45 enrolled) pts at 56 mg/m2 for at least 1 cycle and were evaluable for response. 56% of pts were ISS II/III and 64% had high-risk cytogenetics as per IMWG definition. Pts received a median of 5 cycles of Cfz-dex in both the 45 mg/m2 (range 1-10) and 56 mg/m2 groups (range 1-14). Maximum response to Cfz-dex is shown in Table 1. There was no difference in response between the 45 and 56mg/m2 groups (P = 0.20). Median time to PR and maximum response for the 45 and 56 mg/m2 cohorts were both 2 and 3 cycles, respectively. 42 pts had stem cell harvest. All collected stem cells to support at least two transplants (> 5 x 10^6 CD34/kg) in one mobilization attempt using G-CSF, with mean yield of 13.74x10^6 CD34/kg (range 5.94-32.14). 79% collected in 1 apheresis session. Adverse events (AEs) were notable for renal failure in 3 pts (2 Grade 2, 1 grade 3) and congestive heart failure in 1 pt (grade 3). Two of the 3 cases of renal failure occurred in the 56 mg/m2 cohort, all other AEs occurred in the 45mg/m2 cohort. All AEs resolved after stopping Cfz. There was no correlation with TTE, PFTs or serial BNPs and development of cardiac or pulmonary toxicity. Discussion: This is the first prospective study evaluating induction responses to Cfz-dex in MM. Cfz-dex is safe and active in induction at both 45 and 56 mg/m2, with an ORR of 93% and rate of >= VGPR of 68% despite a primarily high risk population. Specific dose did not correlate with response. Higher dose of Cfz did not lead to more toxicity. Cfz-dex induction led to successful stem cell collection in all attempts. Cfz-dex is a highly active and well-tolerated induction regimen. Transitioning to IMiD-based therapy after maximum response led to deeper responses with a remarkable 97% rate of VGPR or better. Table 1. Maximum Response with Cfz-Dex, followed by BiRD consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance: Response Category Cfz-Dex 45 mg/m2 Cfz-Dex 56 mg/m2 Overall Cfz-Dex phase BiRD phase Lenalidomide maintenance phase N = 25 (%) N = 44 (%) N = 69 (%) N = 44 (%) N = 33 (%) >= PR 22 (88) 42 (95) 65 (93) 44 (100) 33 (100) >= VGPR 16 (72) 31 (70) 45 (68) 42 (95) 32 (97) >= CR 3 (12) 2 (5) 5 (7) 12 (27) 15 (45) SCR 3 (12) 2 (5) 5 (7) 9 (20) 13 (39) CR 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (7) 2 (6) VGPR 13 (52) 29 (66) 42 (61) 30 (68) 17 (52) PR 6 (24) 11 (25) 17 (25) 2 (5) 1 (3) SD 3 (12) 2 (5) 5 (7) 0 0 Disclosures Mark: Calgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib as first line therapy in myeloma.. Rossi:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pearse:Celegen: Consultancy. Perry:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Huang:Celgene: Research Funding. Coleman:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Chen-Kiang:Celgene: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life by Line of Therapy of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3926-3926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
Christopher R. Flowers ◽  
Mark Weiss ◽  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3926 Introduction. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients will have significant variation in signs and symptoms at initial presentation and across lines of therapy, with concomitant effect on patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL and other patient-reported outcomes, together with clinical outcomes, provide a more complete perspective on the burden of disease and facilitate a broader view of the impact of treatment regimens. This analysis evaluates whether the HRQOL of patients with CLL in the United States (US) varies at the time the patients are about to embark on various lines of therapy, and offers a baseline report from which subsequent longitudinal analysis post-treatment will be possible. Methods. Clinical and HRQOL data were collected in Connect®CLL, a prospective observational registry initiated in March 2010 involving centers in the US. Physicians provided data on the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients receiving therapy. HRQOL was self-reported by patients at enrollment using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI, a symptom assessment tool), the EQ-5D (a non-disease-specific HRQOL instrument), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu, a leukemia-specific HRQOL instrument). We characterized patients who had initial (First Line), second (Second Line) or subsequent (Higher Line) treatment regimens prior to initiation of regimens. Reported mean overall and/or domain-specific BFI, EQ-5D and FACT-Leu scores were analyzed by line of therapy. Statistical significance of score differences among sub-cohorts was ascertained by ANOVA using SAS 9.1. Results. Evaluable data were reported on 1005 patients, enrolled from 161 centers (93% community, 7% academic). Patients were predominantly male (62%) and white (89%) with mean age at 69 (standard deviation [SD] 11) years. HRQOL scores by line of therapy are presented: The total FACT-Leu and FACT-G results, and the total EQ-5D Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results, consistently suggest that patients initiating first line therapy have somewhat better HRQOL compared with those initiating subsequent lines of therapy. FACT-Leu total scores of patients initiating first line therapy were associated with better physical and leukemia-specific considerations, and the EQ-5D total score was associated with better mobility and pain/discomfort. Conclusions. Initial results from the Connect® CLL Registry indicate that HRQOL prior to treatment is better among patients initiating first line therapy compared to patients initiating later lines of treatment. Future analyses should be conducted to determine what clinical or other factors may be associated with the HRQOL deterioration in patients initiating subsequent lines of therapy, so as to inform clinician decision making. Also, subsequent longitudinal analyses should be undertaken to determine how HRQOL might be affected by the different lines of therapy and the specific treatment regimens, as well as by their initial HRQOL and other patient factors. Disclosures: Kay: Celgene: Research Funding. Flowers:Celgene: Consultancy; Prescription Solutions: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Genentech: Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Gilead: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Janssen lymphoma research foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weiss:Celgene: Consultancy. Lamanna:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Flinn:Celgene: Research Funding. Grinblatt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kipps:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kozloff:Celgene: Consultancy. Lerner:Celgene Connect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Khan:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Street:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Swern:Celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment. Pashos:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag Combined with Cyclosporine As First-Line Therapy in Adults with Severe Acquired Aplastic Anemia: Results of the Interventional Phase 2 Single-Arm Soar Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2174-2174
Author(s):  
Carlos Vallejo ◽  
Jun Ho Jang ◽  
Carlo Finelli ◽  
Efreen Montaño Figueroa ◽  
Lalita Norasetthada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Transfusion Independence ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Insufficient Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare bone marrow failure disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. SAA is characterized by severe pancytopenia and a hypocellular (&lt;25%) bone marrow. The standard of care treatment is hemopoietic stem cell transplant or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for patients (pts) who are ineligible for transplant. IST usually comprises an antithymocyte globulin (ATG) derived from horse or rabbit, and cyclosporine A (CsA). Although IST can be an effective treatment, individual intolerance, insufficient response, relapse, and clonal evolution remain significant limitations. The lack of global availability of the more effective horse ATG also leaves many pts with limited treatment options and poorer outcomes. In addition, pts with SAA often require transfusions which can be burdensome and negatively impact their quality of life. Eltrombopag (ETB) is indicated for use in pts with SAA who have had an insufficient response to IST (FDA PI, 2014) or are refractory to IST (EMA SmPC, 2015). More recently in the USA, ETB may also be used in combination with IST as first-line (1L) treatment (FDA PI, 2018). Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of ETB + CsA (without ATG) as 1L therapy in adult pts with SAA. Methods: SOAR (NCT02998645) is a Phase 2, single-arm, multicenter, open-label study. Treatment-naive pts with SAA received ETB + CsA for 6 months; responders continued CsA therapy for an additional 24 months (later reduced to 18 months). The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by 6 months. ORR was defined as the proportion of pts with complete response ([CR] = absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥1000/μL AND platelet count ≥100,000/μL AND hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL) plus the proportion of pts with partial response ([PR] = any 2 of the following counts: ANC ≥500/μL; platelet count ≥20,000/μL; automated reticulocyte count ≥60,000/μL, but not sufficient for a CR). CR and PR were confirmed by 2 assessments ≥7 days apart; transfusion restrictions were also applied. For the primary endpoint to be considered 'clinically meaningful' at least 17/54 pts treated were required to have a response. Other endpoints included ORR by 3 months, ORR at 6 months (ie, confirmed response at the 6-month visit), and transfusion independence, which was defined as transfusion not being required in a period of ≥28 days for platelet transfusions and ≥56 days for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Results: Pts (N=54) had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 55.0 (40.0-67.0) years and 63.0% were male. The majority of pts were White (40.7%) or Asian (40.7%). The median (IQR) duration of exposure to ETB and CsA was 5.7 (2.5-5.8) months and 5.7 (2.4-8.1) months, respectively, and the median (IQR) daily ETB dose was 150.0 (100.0-150.0) mg/day. In the full analysis set, the primary endpoint was met, with 25/54 pts having a CR or PR by 6 months (ORR 46.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32.6-60.4%). Of the 25 responders, 2 (3.7%) achieved a CR by 6 months. ORR by 3 months was 40.7% (95% CI, 27.6-55.0%; n=22/54), and ORR at 6 months was 37.0% (95% CI, 24.3-51.3%; n=20/54). 70.4% of all pts qualified for ≥1 period of RBC and/or platelet transfusion independence by 6 months, including all 25 (100%) responders and 13/29 (44.8%) non-responders (Fig. 1). 40.7% of all pts (responders: 68.0%; non-responders: 17.2%) qualified for ≥1 period of RBC transfusion independence (corresponding percentages for platelet transfusion independence were the same as for the combined RBC and/or platelet endpoint). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 52/54 (96.3%) pts; 45 (83.3%) pts experienced treatment-related AEs (TAEs), 23 (42.6%) of whom had a grade ≥3 TAE. The most common all-grade AEs were increased blood bilirubin (40.7%), nausea (29.6%), increased alanine aminotransferase (22.2%), and diarrhea (22.2%). Seven (13.0%) pts discontinued treatment due to grade ≥3 AEs. There were 8 on-treatment deaths (aplastic anemia [n=3]; COVID-19, hemorrhage, multi-organ dysfunction syndrome, pyrexia, and thrombosis [all n=1]); no deaths were considered treatment-related. Conclusion: Data from the SOAR study indicate that ETB + CsA may be beneficial for pts with SAA ineligible for transplant who cannot access or tolerate ATG. All responders and almost half of non-responders qualified for ≥1 period of transfusion independence by 6 months, suggestive of a decreased transfusion burden. No new safety signals were identified. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Vallejo: Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Finelli: Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Calado: Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AA&MDS International Foundation: Research Funding; Alexion Brasil: Consultancy; Instituto Butantan: Consultancy; Novartis Brasil: Honoraria; Team Telomere, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peffault De Latour: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kriemler-Krahn: Novartis: Current Employment. Haenig: Novartis: Current Employment. Maier: Novartis: Current Employment. Scheinberg: Alexion pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: In the United States, eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated in combination with standard immunosuppressive therapy (ATG + CsA) for the first-line treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). It is also indicated for the treatment of patients with SAA who have had an insufficient response to immunosuppressive therapy. The SOAR trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag + CsA (without ATG) as first-line therapy in adult patients with SAA.

scholarly journals Real-World Evidence on Shift in Treatment Practice and Adoption of Novel Agents for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the United States

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5013-5013
Author(s):  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Keri Yang ◽  
Sizhu Liu ◽  
Todd Zimmerman ◽  
Boxiong Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
First Line ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Oral Agents ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: Clinical availability of highly effective novel agents (including Bruton tyrosine kinase [BTK] and B-cell lymphoma 2 [BCL-2] inhibitors) is rapidly altering the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) necessitating a review of treatment guidelines. However, there is limited real-world data to validate if the availability of these novel agents has translated to a true shift in treatment paradigm for patients treated in the community. As the majority of CLL patients are treated in non-academic community-based settings, we investigated the clinical adoption trends of commercially available FDA approved novel agents for treatment of CLL patients. In addition, given that the COVID-19 pandemic led to major alteration in clinical oncology practices, we further studied if this contributed to an alteration in the selection of therapeutic agents resulting in changes of CLL treatment patterns and the utilization of novel agents in the real-world setting. Thus, the objectives of this study were to examine the utilization pattern of various CLL therapies, as well as evaluate the pattern of adoption of novel agents for treatment and the impact of COVID. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the Flatiron Health database that comprised EHR-derived de-identified data. Adult patients (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed CLL from January 2014 to May 2021, with no prior treatment and who were continuously enrolled for at least 6 months before and 3 months after the index date, defined as the first date of CLL/SLL diagnosis were included. Treatment regimens were classified into seven mutually exclusive categories: bendamustine-based chemotherapy, other chemotherapy, anti-CD20-based therapy, ibrutinib, idelalisib, acalabrutinib and venetoclax. Further treatment categorization included chemotherapy vs. targeted therapy, and traditional IV vs. novel oral agents. The impact of the pandemic was examined by comparing the pre- and post-COVID cohorts (defined as 15 months pre- and post- of March 1, 2021). Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine the frequency of use of treatment regimens by quarter in each year, line of therapy and between different age, gender, US geographical region, insurance status, and race/ethnicity subgroups. Multivariable regression was conducted to examine factors associated with the likelihood of adoption of novel and oral agents. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value of less than 0.05. Results: A total of 3,037 newly diagnosed CLL patients (median age =73) were included in the study. Over half were male (62.3%), white (74.6%) and commercially-insured (54.1%). Patients were primarily treated in community practices (92%). Overall, a significant trend in adoption of novel agents was observed throughout the years following their approval (Figure 1A). Across the evaluation period, a significant decrease in chemotherapy use was observed from 61.3% (quarter 1, 2014) to 20% (quarter 2, 2021) in favor of targeted therapy as first-line therapy (Figure 1B). In contrast, the utilization of novel oral agents (vs. traditional IV agents) for first-line therapy increased from 9.5% to 70.9% for the same period (Figure 1C). Similar trends were observed for second-line and third-line therapies. Encouragingly, this change in treatment patterns was adopted comparably in all sociodemographic subgroups with no evidence of disparity. While there was no statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-COVID treatment landscape, the adoption of target and novel oral agents has been more pronounced with the COVID pandemic. Conclusions: Results from real-world data suggest that there is a clear shift towards the adoption of novel therapies with preference given to targeted agents and oral therapies in the US since 2014. Further research examining real-world outcomes associated with treatment regimens are needed to inform decision makers. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chanan-Khan: Cellectar: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Alpha2 Pharmaceuticals, NonoDev, Starton: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Ascentage: Research Funding; Alpha2 Pharmaceuticals: Patents & Royalties: Tabi; Ascentage, Starton, Cellectar, NonoDev, Alpha2 Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene, Jansen, Ascentage: Honoraria; BieGene, Jansen, Ascentage: Consultancy. Yang: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Liu: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Zimmerman: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Tang: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Ailawadhi: Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy.

A Randomised Dose De-Escalation Study of Oral Fludarabine, ±Oral Cyclophosphamide and Intravenous Rituximab As First-Line Therapy of Fit Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) Aged ≥65 Years: Final Analysis of Response and Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3325-3325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Mulligan ◽  
Devinder Gill ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
William E. P. Renwick ◽  
Maya Latimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Remission ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: Fludarabine (F), cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) gave superior progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus (vs) FC in the CLL8 Study. The median age in CLL8 was 61 years compared to 72 years for CLL overall. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of FCR based therapy in elderly patients (pts). METHODS: Previously untreated pts with progressive CLL aged ≥65 were randomised to one of 3 therapy arms: (i) FR5: F 24mg/m2 po D1-5 + R (375mg/m2 cycle 1, 500mg/m2 cycles 2-6) iv D1, (ii) FCR3: F 24mg/m2 po and C 150mg/m2 po D1-3 + R iv D1 or (iii) FCR5: F 24mg/m2 po+ C 150mg/m2 po D1-5 + R iv D1 all at 4 weekly intervals for an intended 6 cycles. Cycles could be delayed up to 2 weeks for grade 3+ toxicity, and if unresolved by 2 weeks, pts were taken off study. All analyses were by intention to treat (ITT) and adjusted for pre-treatment Binet stage. RESULTS: Recruitment of 120 pts was completed in July 2012. 117 fulfilled eligibility and 1 had no treatment or follow-up reducing the cohort to 116. Median age was 71 (range 65-82) years; 78 males (67%) and 39 females (33%). Binet stage was progressive A - 19 (16.2%), B – 55 (47.0%), C – 43 (36.8%). Response data are shown in table 1 and grade 3+ toxicity in table 2. All 6 protocol cycles were completed in 69% but less on FCR5 44% vs FR5 89% and FCR3 76% (p<0.001). FCR3 vs FR5 was not statistically significant (NSS).Reasons for non-completion were death, intercurrent illness, withdrawn consent, stable or progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity and doctor decision. Abstract 3325. Table 1:Response - Final Pathological Staging 2 months Post-Rx or at Rx endTreatment armTotal (n=116)FR5FCR3FCR5(N=37)(N=41)(N=38)Complete remission (CR)14 (38% )21 (51% )30 (79% )65 (56%)CR (Bone Marrow confirmed)9 (24% )13 (32% )8 (21% )30 (26% )CR-i (BM confirmed)1 (3% )5 (12% )9 (24% )15 (13% )CR-u (no BM, PB MRD-neg)1 (3% )2 (5% )4 (11% )7 (6% )CR-i/u (no BM, PB MRD-neg)3 (8% )1 (2% )9 (24% )13 (11% )Nodular Partial Remission (nPR)11 (30% )13 (32% )3 (8% )27 (23% )Partial Remission (PR)10 (27% )5 (12% )4 (11% )19 (16% )Stable Disease (SD)1 (3% )1 (2% )0 (0% )2 (2% )Progressive Disease (PD) / early death1 (3% )1 (2% )1 (3% )3 (3% )Overall Response Rate (ORR) (CR, CR-i, CR-u, CR-i/u, nPR, PR)35 (95% )39 (95% )37 (97% )111 (96% ) ORR was high in all 3 arms but CR rates were higher with FCR5 (p<0.001) vs FCR3 and FR5 (FCR3 vs FR5 NSS). When done, minimum residual disease at ~10-4was negative in blood in 27/84 and in marrow 33/70 pts.. PFS (p=0.672) and OS (p=0.164) between treatment arms was NSS. PFS and OS at 12 months were 83% and 95%, and 18 months 69% and 90% respectively. At 18 months, PFS was FR5 65%, FCR3 75%, FCR5 65% and OS 97%, 90%, 83% respectively. Table 2:Grade 3+ Adverse Events by Treatment ArmTreatment armTotal (n=116)FR5FCR3FCR5(N=37)(N=41)(N=38)Hematological15 (41% )26 (63% )29 (76% )70 (60%)Neutropenia14 (38% )20 (49% )24 (63% )58 (50% )Thrombocytopenia2 (5% )5 (12% )12 (32% )19 (16% )Anaemia3 (8% )6 (15% )6 (16% )15 (13% )Haemolytic Anaemia0 (0% )2 (5% )3 (8% )5 (4% )Febrile Neutropenia / Infection5 (14% )6 (15% )13 (34% )24 (21% )Skin/Allergy/Fatigue/hypersensitivity0 (0% )3 (7% )8 (21% )11 (9% )Other (Card / resp / neuro / metabolic)5 (14%)11 (27%)11 (29%)27 (23%)At least 1 grade 3+ AE21 (57%)34 (83%)35 (92%)90 (78%)Early cessation due to toxicity2 (5.6%)1 (2.4%)13 (34%)16 (14%) Toxicity was lower with FR5 compared to FCR3 and FCR5 (p=0.004) (FCR3 vs FCR5 NSS). Dose delay occurred in 43 pts (37%): FR5 12 (32%), FCR3 14 (34%), FCR5 17 (44%) (p=0.653), but early cessation due to toxicity was more common with FCR5 (p<0.001). 11/13 pts stopping early due to toxicity received ≥3 cycles of therapy (mean 3.5). Cyclophosphamide with FR adds toxicity but improves CR rate. ITT full dose FCR5 CR rates were significantly higher (79%), but also higher rates of incomplete marrow recovery, haematological toxicity and earlier cessation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Final analysis shows oral FCR therapy is generally safe and well tolerated in CLL pts aged ≥65 years requiring first-line treatment, when early stopping is utilised if prolonged toxicity occurs. Toxicity was mostly hematological and manageable. Response rates were very high with ORR of 96% and CR rate of 56% (39% not including CRu). Full dose FCR is highly effective and while cessation due to toxicity appears important, a dose intensity effect may exist. Dose reduced FCR provides a balance of effectiveness, safety and tolerability as first-line therapy for fit elderly pts. Disclosures Mulligan: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gill:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Turner:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Renwick:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Latimer:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Mackinlay:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Berkahn:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Simpson:Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Forsyth:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Harrup:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Kuss:Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Good Tolerance of Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy in Patients with High Risk Profile Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) after Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy: Preliminary Safety Overview of the CLLM1 Trial of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4699-4699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Eichhorst ◽  
Jasmin Bahlo ◽  
Anna Maria Fink ◽  
Michael Pfreundschuh ◽  
Holger Hebart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: CLL patients (pts) with persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or an unfavourable genetic profile have a high risk of early relapse and a short survival (Fink et al., Leukemia 2013). Therefore, the GCLLSG designed the CLLM1 trial, a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide maintenance therapy for high–risk (HR) CLL following first-line chemoimmunotherapy. HR is defined by the presence of MRD at levels of ≥10-2 or the combination of MRD levels of ≥10-4 to <10-2 with an unmutated IGHV status, or del(17p) or TP53 mutations. Methods and patients: Prior to randomization pts underwent central screening procedures including the assessment of all risk factors and eligibility in particular response to first-line therapy. MRD levels were centrally analyzed. Pts were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or lenalidomide 5 mg p.o. daily for the first 28-day cycle, 10 mg p.o. daily for cycle 2-6, and the target dose of 15 mg for cycle 7-12. Further escalations up to 25 mg were allowed in MRD-positive pts if the study drug was well tolerated. Pts were treated until progression. Between July 2012 and June 2014 535 pts were registered from 130 sites in five countries (Austria, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Spain). 126 (23.6%) of the pts were excluded before proceeding to MRD-analysis after first-line therapy due to misdiagnosis of other B-cell lymphoma (N=18), withdrawal of consent (N=44), comorbidities (N=5), hepatitis B infections (N=2) or other reasons (N=57). A total of 239 pts completed the screening. 186 (77.8%) achieved MRD negativity and were therefore ineligible for the study, and 8 (3.3%) pts are awaiting randomization. Pts remained blinded for this analysis. Results: To date, 45 HR pts were randomized. First-line therapy according to investigator’s choice included FCR in 17 (37.8%), BR in 27 (60.0%) and FC in 1 (2.2%) of 45 pts. Before first-line therapy, 9 of 45 (20.0%) pts had Binet A, 19 (43.2%) Binet B and 16 (36.4%) Binet C stage of disease, respectively. The median age was 66 years (range 44-80), median CIRS score was 2 (range 0-6). 33 of 45 pts (73.3%) showed MRD levels between ≥10-4 to <10-2 combined with by high risk genetics, and 12 (26.7%) showed MRD levels ≥10-2. 43 (95.1%) pts had unmutated IGVH genes. Del(17p) was detected in 4 (8.9%) and TP53 mutation in 6 (13.3%) pts, while 2 (4.4%) pts carried both abnormalities. At the time point of analysis 195 treatment cycles [60.2% of 324 expected cycles] were documented in 26 of 45 (57.8%) randomized pts. The median number of administered cycles was 6.5 (range 1-20). 115 of 195 treatment cycles (59.0%) were administered without the occurrence of any adverse event (AE). In 80 treatment cycles (41.0%) at least one AE was documented. 133 adverse events (AEs) of all CTC grades (1 to 4) occurred in 19 of 26 pts (73.1%). Eleven pts (42.3%) experienced at least one AE of CTC grade 3 or 4. The most common AEs were related to haematological parameters [9 (34.6%) pts, 7 (26.9%) with CTC grade 3/4], infections [8 (30.7%), all CTC grade 1/2], gastrointestinal [9 (34.6%), all CTC grade 1/2], respiratory/thoracic/mediastinal [4 (15.4%), all CTC grade 1/2] and skin disorders [9 (34.6%), 2 (7.6%) with CTC grade 3]. AEs led to the discontinuation of study treatment in 3 pts (11.5%) including fatigue [N=1, CTC grade 3] and allergic dermatitis [N=2, both CTC grade 3]. In total 13 of 45 pts (28.9%) treated in both arms have discontinued the study caused by withdrawal of consent (N=5) disease progression (N=4), toxicity (N=3) and technical reasons (N=1). To date, no treatment-related death has been reported in both treatment arms. Seven SAEs have been reported so far, three of them related to treatment including septic arthritis due to staphylococcal infection, autoimmune haemolytic anemia and cholecystitis, the latter resulted in study discontinuation. Conclusion: So far, maintenance therapy with lenalidomide or placebo appears to be a safe treatment option as the majority of adverse events reported during the maintenance therapy were mild or moderate (CTC grade 1/2). Severe adverse events (CTC grade 3/4) were observed solely with skin reactions and cytopenia. Reasons for discontinuation were mostly non-serious events including skin reactions and fatigue. Later analyses will clarify the impact of lenalidomide maintenance on relapse-free survival in high-risk CLL. Disclosures Eichhorst: Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for maintenance treatment in CLL. Fink:Celgene: Other. Maschmeyer:Celgene: Consultancy. Westermann:Celgene: Other. Zey:Celgene: Other. Fischer:Roche: Other. Wendtner:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ghia:Merck: Consultancy; GSK, Roche Italia: Consultancy; Gilead, Pharmacyclics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Roche Italia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bosch:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:Celgene: Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Boettcher:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Hallek:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Favorable Outcome in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achyut Ram Vyakaranam ◽  
Joakim Crona ◽  
Olov Norlén ◽  
Dan Granberg ◽  
Ulrike Garske-Román ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Radiological Response ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a promising therapy for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the outcome of PRRT for 22 patients with histopathologically confirmed pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL), of which two were localized and 20 metastatic. Radiological response utilized response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 and toxicity was graded according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4. Median 4 (range 3–11) 7.4 GBq cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE were administered as first-line therapy (n = 13) or because of progressive disease (n = 9). Partial response (PR) was achieved in two and stable disease (SD) in 20 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 49.6 (range 8.2–139) months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6 (range 6.7–138) months. Scintigraphic response >50% was achieved in 9/19 (47%) patients. Biochemical response (>50% decrease) of chromogranin A was found in 6/15 (40%) patients and of catecholamines in 3/12 (25%) patients. Subgroup analysis showed Ki-67 <15% associated with longer OS (p = 0.013) and PFS (p = 0.005). PRRT as first-line therapy was associated with increased OS (p = 0.041). No hematological or kidney toxicity grade 3–4 was registered. 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was associated with favorable outcome and low toxicity. High Ki-67 (≥15%) and PRRT received because of progression on previous therapy could constitute negative predictive factors for OS.

Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Multicenter Trial

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Jassem ◽  
Tadeusz Pieńkowski ◽  
Anna Płuzańska ◽  
Svetislav Jelic ◽  
Vera Gorbunova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) to 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 267 women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed 24 hours later by paclitaxel 220 mg/m2) or FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2), each administered every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Patients had to have measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Only one prior non–anthracycline, nontaxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Overall response rates for patients randomized to AT and FAC were 68% and 55%, respectively (P = .032). Median time to progression and overall survival were significantly longer for AT compared with FAC (time to progression 8.3 months v 6.2 months [P = .034]; overall survival 23.3 months v 18.3 months [P = .013]). Therapy was generally well-tolerated (median of eight cycles delivered in each arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with AT than with FAC (89% v 65%; P < .001); however, the incidence of fever and infection was low. Grade 3 or 4 arthralgia and myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, and diarrhea were more common with AT, whereas nausea and vomiting were more common with FAC. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was low in both arms. CONCLUSION: AT conferred a significant advantage in response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with FAC. Treatment was well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Fludarabine (F) in First Line Therapy of Younger Versus Elderly Patients (Pts) with Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Meta-Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 717-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Clemens M. Wendtner ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: F based regimen have become the standard treatment in CLL at least in younger pts. However, in elderly pts chlorambucil is still frequently used since it is easy to administer and has less side effects. Here we compare the efficacy and toxicity of F administered to younger pts and elderly pts treated between 1999 and 2004 within two phase III trials of GCLLSG. Patients: 362 pts (median age 59 [range 37–65] years) were randomized to F (n=182) or F plus cyclophosphamide (n=180) within the CLL4 trial. 191 elderly pts (median age 71 [range 65–79] years) were treated with F (92 pts) or chlorambucil (99 pts) within the CLL5 protocol. Inclusion criteria were identical in both trials except for age limits. All pts were previously untreated and in advanced stage Binet C or Binet B with symptoms which require therapy or Binet A with severe B-symptoms. In both studies the F regimen consisted of 30 mg/m2/day (d) IV for 5 consecutive days, every 28 d for up to 6 cycles. Anti-infective prophylaxis and growth factors were not given routinely in both trials. Results: Most of patients in both age groups were in Binet stage B (54% of the younger pts and 52% of the elderly), 35% in each age group were in Binet stage C, 11% and 13% respectively in Binet stage A. No significant difference in the main clinical features was observed except for a higher incidence of concomitant disease in the elderly (61% versus 36%, p=0.001). A mean number of 5.2 F courses was administered in the CLL4 trial and 4.9 courses in the CLL5 trial. The mean administered cumulative dose of F per pt was lower in the elderly pts (1076 mg vs. 1194 mg, p= 0.05). Overall response rates were similar in both arms, with 82.9% in the younger group and 85.7% in the elderly. The complete remission rate was 6.7% in the younger patients and 10.4% in the elderly (p= 0.3). After a follow up time of 24 months (mo) the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in the elderly group with 18.7 mo compared to 19.8 mo in the younger group after 22 mo observation time (p=0.03). The overall survival (OS) was significantly impaired in elderly pts as well (29 mo versus median not reached, p&lt;0.001). Progressive disease was the main cause of death in both age groups. In each group 3 treatment related deaths occurred due to infection or hemolysis. The incidence of side effects was similar in both age groups. Severe, CTC grade 3 and 4, myelosuppression occurred in 39% of the younger and 41% of the elderly pts. No difference in the rate of leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or anemia was oberved as well. The incidence rate and severity of infections was similar in both groups (24% vs. 32% all and 8.7% vs. 6.9% CTC grade 3 and 4). The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts (2.2% vs. 12.2%, p=0.001). In comparison the prevalence rate of neoplasia in the U.S. population peaks at 11% in the age group of 70–79 (SEER cancer statistic review: 1972–2002). Conclusion: F is a well tolerated treatment regimen in first line therapy of elderly pts with CLL. Response rates were similar in both age groups. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in the elderly population. The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts, but is only slightly increased in comparison to the normal population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document