Spontaneous Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Syndrome: Two New Cases and a Proposal For Defining This Disorder

Abstract Introduction Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a transient, autoimmune-like, prothrombotic disorder caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating IgG reactive against platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H). There is an emerging literature (Am J Med 2008;121:632-6. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:1598-1600; Thromb Haemost 2013;109:669-75) pointing to rare instances of “spontaneous” HIT in patients without preceding heparin. We report 2 new cases and propose a definition for this controversial disorder. CASE #1. A 62-y.o. man presented with left middle cerebral artery stroke and thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 65×109/L). There was no previous history of thrombocytopenia, surgery, hospitalization, or heparin exposure. Clot extraction performed with heparin was complicated by further platelet count decline to 27 (nadir) and progressive thrombosis of the carotid artery. Aspirin was started, and the platelets recovered to >150 by day 13. CASE #2. A 54-y.o. female developed right leg swelling, left-upper extremity weakness/paresthesias, and thrombocytopenia (61×109/L) 15 days post-shoulder hemiarthroplasty; no intra-/postoperative heparin had been given. Brain MRI demonstrated acute infarct in the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory; angiography showed non-visualization of the left vertebral artery. Ultrasound revealed right lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis. Heparin treatment resulted in further platelet count fall to 37 (nadir). Treatment with argatroban, followed by fondaparinux, was associated with platelet count recovery to >150 by day 39. Methods Testing for HIT antibodies was performed by commercial EIA-IgG/A/M (Immucor GTI Diagnostics), in-house EIA-IgG (McMaster), and serotonin-release assay (SRA). Results Both patients’ sera (obtained before any heparin administration) tested strongly positive for HIT antibodies (Table), including strong platelet activation at 0.1 and 0.3 IU/mL heparin, as well as at 0 U/mL heparin, with no platelet activation at 100 IU/mL heparin: these serological features are characteristic of “delayed-onset HIT” (Ann Intern Med 2001;135:502-6). Antibody reactivity declined markedly by 2 to 4 weeks (including loss of platelet-activating properties at 0 IU/mL heparin), in keeping with the usual transience of HIT antibodies (N Engl J Med 2001;344:1286-92), and paralleling both patients’ platelet count recovery. Discussion These cases further support spontaneous HIT as an unusual explanation for acute arterial stroke and thrombocytopenia. One patient had preceding orthopedic surgery, an event previously reported with spontaneous HIT (Thromb Haemost 2013;109:669-75). The strong serum-dependent platelet activation at 0 IU/mL heparin helps to explain how thrombocytopenia and thrombosis can occur in a patient not receiving heparin. RECOMMENDATION. Based on the serological findings of these and previous cases, we propose that a definitive diagnosis of spontaneous HIT syndrome should be based upon all of the following criteria: thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, lack of proximate heparin exposure, strong-positive PF4-dependent immunoassay(s), and a strong-positive platelet activation assay featuring both heparin-dependent (e.g., high heparin neutralization) and heparin-independent platelet activation (at 0 IU/mL heparin). Disclosures: Warkentin: Pfizer Canada: Honoraria; Paringenix: Consultancy; Immucor GTI Diagnostics: Research Funding; WL Gore: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Incidence of Thrombosis in Patients with Isolated Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.1049.1049 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 1049-1049 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rachel P. Rosovsky ◽

Omar I. Abdel-Wahad ◽

Elizabeth M. Van Cott ◽

David J. Kuter

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Mortality Rate ◽

Massachusetts General Hospital ◽

Thrombotic Event ◽

Radiographic Examination ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Total Incidence ◽

Objective Evidence ◽

Heparin Exposure

Abstract Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type-II (HIT) is a serious prothrombotic disorder caused by heparin exposure. The incidence of thrombosis in patients with isolated HIT, defined as HIT without clinically evident thrombosis at the time of diagnosis, is not well established. Aim: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the total incidence of thrombotic events after diagnosis of isolated HIT from radiographic evidence of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) plus radiographic confirmation of symptomatic thrombosis. Patients and Methods: We evaluated all patients with a positive enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody (Ab) daily at Massachusetts General Hospital from 10/10/05 to 5/13/06. Inpatients with (1) a positive PF4 Ab test, (2) thrombocytopenia, as defined by a ≥50% drop from baseline platelet count and/or a fall in platelet count to <150×109/L, in association with heparin exposure, (3) no signs or symptoms of thrombosis at time of the positive Ab test, and (4) no other definitive etiology of thrombocytopenia were considered to have isolated HIT and included for study. Patients with a prior diagnosis of HIT, DVT, pulmonary embolism, or peripheral arterial thrombosis were excluded. Within 72 hours of diagnosis and of initiation of a non-heparin anticoagulant, all included patients underwent radiographic examination for asymptomatic DVT in the lower extremities (LE). Objective evidence of thrombotic events other than LE DVT after the diagnosis was also recorded. Daily platelet count, type and timing of all anticoagulants, use of blood products, and PF4 Ab titer were collected to determine if there was an association between these factors and development of thrombosis. Mortality rate during hospitalization was also recorded. Results: Of the 158 patients with a positive heparin-PF4 Ab, 64 patients met criteria for study, 14 of which were lost to follow-up. Among the 50 remaining eligible patients, the total incidence of thrombosis was 20% (12% were found to have an asymptomatic thrombotic event and 8% developed a symptomatic thrombotic event). Development of thrombosis was independently associated with platelet transfusion (p=0.005) and with the degree of platelet count nadir as expressed by platelet count (p=0.038) or by percent decrease from baseline (p=0.031). There was no association between the PF4 Ab titer or the type and timing of non-heparin anticoagulant and development of thrombosis. The overall mortality rate in patients diagnosed with isolated HIT during hospitalization was 22%. Conclusion: The total incidence of thrombotic events in isolated HIT was 20%, with greater than half of the events being asymptomatic thromboses found only by radiographic examination. This high incidence of asymptomatic LE DVT suggests that routine investigation for LE DVT should be performed in this patient population and that patients with isolated HIT should be treated with a non-heparin anticoagulant. Our findings also confirm the current recommendation to avoid platelet transfusions in patients with isolated HIT as we found an increased rate of thrombosis associated with this practice.

Download Full-text

Clinical Features of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Diagnosed By Lumi-Aggregometry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4185.4185 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4185-4185

Author(s):

Elona Turley ◽

Artur J. Szkotak ◽

Irwindeep Sandhu ◽

Cynthia M Wu

Keyword(s):

Platelet Activation ◽

Light Flash ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Serotonin Release ◽

Radioactive Isotopes ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Dense Granules ◽

Heparin Exposure

Abstract Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with anti-platelet factor-4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies that activate platelets, resulting in thrombocytopenia and a pro-thrombotic state. At our institution antibody-mediated platelet activation is demonstrated by lumi-aggregometry, which is a method previously validated against the gold standard serotonin-release assay (SRA). Lumi-aggregometry does not involve radioactive isotopes, which is its major advantage over the SRA. The clinical course of HIT diagnosed via SRA and ELISA has been previously described, and clinical prediction tools such as the 4-T score were validated using these diagnostic tests. However, the clinical picture of HIT diagnosed by lumi-aggregometry has not been previously described. Aims: The objective of this study is to describe the clinical and laboratory presentation of patients diagnosed with HIT by lumi-aggregometry. Methods: Patients with clinically suspected HIT and quantitative anti-PF4 IgG-specific ELISA OD ≥0.400 (Gen-Probe, San Diego) received confirmatory HIT testing by lumi-aggregometry. Briefly, HIT antibody-induced activation of washed healthy donor platelets was tested at therapeutic (0.1U/mL and 0.5U/mL) and high (100U/mL) porcine heparin concentration. The degree of platelet activation was quantitated luminographically based on the light flash reaction of ATP (released from platelet dense-granules) with luciferin luciferase reagent. A ratio of therapeutic to high heparin luminescence amplitude of >5.0 and platelet aggregation at therapeutic, but not high, concentrations was considered a positive result. The results of assays performed by our regional HIT testing referral laboratory from June 2009 to July 2012 were reviewed to identify patients with positive HIT testing by lumi-aggregometry. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain predefined data on baseline patient characteristics, heparin exposure, platelet counts, and thrombotic events occurring in the 5 days preceding or the 30 days following the date of positive HIT testing. Results: We identified 43 patients diagnosed with HIT by lumi-aggregometry (median age 68.0, 49% male) while under the care of local academic (46%) or urban community hospitals (37.2% medical; 53.5% surgical; 9.3% intensive care). Median baseline platelet count was 187 (14-349). Median date of platelet drop post-heparin exposure was 6 days (range 3-14) in patients without prior heparin exposure or platelet transfusions (Figure 1). Platelet drop >50% and platelet nadir ≥20x109/L were present in the majority of patients (Table 1). Thrombocytopenia occurred prior to (70.5%) or the same day (23.5%) as thrombosis in 16/17 patients with serial platelet counts who developed HIT-associated thromboembolism. Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with HIT by lumi-aggregometry present with similar findings to those described in SRA-confirmed HIT. These findings lend support to the use of lumi-aggregometry as an accurate diagnostic assay for the clinico-pathologic syndrome of HIT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Table 1. Percentage platelet drop from baseline and platelet nadir Percent platelet drop Platelet nadir >50% 30-50% <30% ≥20 x 109/L 28 3 2 10-19 x 109/L 5 1 0 <10 x 109/L 1 1 0 Disclosures Szkotak: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Sandhu:Celgene: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Pathogenic Antibodies in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Specifically Target an Immunodominant Region on Platelet Factor 4

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131462 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 219-219

Author(s):

Angela Huynh ◽

Donald M. Arnold ◽

John G. Kelton ◽

Rumi Clare ◽

Marina Ivanova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Amino Acids ◽

Structural Analysis ◽

Platelet Activation ◽

False Positive ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cross Linking ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Immunodominant Region ◽

Pathogenic Antibodies

Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction that occurs when heparin binds to platelet factor 4 (PF4) forming immunogenic complexes. Anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies bind PF4/heparin complexes, leading to cross-linking of FcγRIIa receptors on platelets and FcγRI on monocytes, resulting in platelet activation, thrombocytopenia, and thrombosis. The current diagnostic challenge is that the majority of patients suspected of HIT yield false-positive results in immunoassays, since up to 50% of patients will make anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but will not develop HIT. The antibody response in HIT patients is polyclonal, making it difficult to identify a common pathogenic epitope. The disparities between anti-PF4/heparin antibodies that activate platelets (pathogenic HIT antibodies) and those that do not (non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies) present a significant challenge in diagnosing HIT. The objective of this study was to map and characterize the critical immunodominant region on PF4 for the binding of pathogenic antibodies in confirmed HIT patients. Methods: We used sera with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from patients with confirmed HIT (n=10). Post-cardiopulmonary bypass patients (CPB; n=10) and healthy individuals (n=10) were used as controls. Confirmed HIT patients met clinical criteria (4Ts ≥ 4) and tested positive in both the anti-PF4 IgG/A/M immunoassay (OD > 0.4; range 2.33 - 3.90) and in the serotonin release assay (SRA release > 20%; range 88-100%). CPB patients all received heparin but did not develop HIT, tested positive in the anti-PF4 IgG/A/M immunoassay (OD > 0.4; range 0.42 - 2.73), and tested negative in the SRA (SRA release < 20%; range 0-18%). We previously used alanine scanning mutagenesis and identified 30 amino acids that were on the surface of PF4 and were likely a part of the region essential for the binding of pathogenic HIT antibodies. From those results, we used the panel of 30 PF4 mutants and tested their ability to bind to HIT, CPB, and healthy control sera. Loss of binding to PF4 mutants was applied to in-silico structural analysis to determine binding regions specific for pathogenic and non-pathogenic antibodies. We also determined binding affinities of pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies using biolayer interferometry (BLI). Results: When 30 PF4 mutants were used to test the effect of the amino acid changes on the binding of HIT and CPB patient sera, an average of 8 different PF4 mutants resulted in more than 35% loss of binding to confirmed HIT sera when compared to wild-type PF4. None of the 30 PF4 mutants resulted in more than 35% loss of binding to CPB sera. Structural analysis demonstrated that the amino acids of PF4 that significantly affected the binding of HIT sera, but not CPB sera, were clustered to a specific region on PF4, similar to the region of KKO, but with varying epitopes. Using BLI, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of confirmed HIT patients had a stronger binding response to PF4 and PF4/heparin than that of CPB patients and healthy controls. Overall, we were able to show a significant difference between confirmed HIT sera and the false-positive antibodies of CPB patients that did not develop HIT (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This work shows that among the polyclonal response in HIT, pathogenic HIT antibodies must bind to the critical immunodominant region on PF4 with high affinity. This ensures the proper spatial configuration of the antibodies for Fc-receptor cross-linking, platelet activation, and subsequently HIT. This study has implications for the development of novel epitope-targeted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for HIT. Disclosures Arnold: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Research Funding; Principia: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Prothrombotic Thrombocytopenic Disorder Resembling Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Following Coronavirus-19 Vaccination

10.21203/rs.3.rs-362354/v2 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Andreas Greinacher ◽

Thomas Thiele ◽

Theodore E. Warkentin ◽

Karin Weisser ◽

Paul Kyrle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Activation ◽

Adenoviral Vector ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Post Vaccination ◽

Receptor Blocking ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Activation Assay ◽

Laboratory Features ◽

High Concentrations

Abstract Background. Vaccines are important for managing the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. However, following widespread vaccination using a recombinant adenoviral vector encoding the spike protein antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (AZD1222, AstraZeneca), reports have emerged of some vaccine recipients developing unusual thrombotic events and thrombocytopenia. We investigated whether such patients could have a prothrombotic disorder caused by platelet-activating antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4), as is known to be caused by heparin and sometimes other environmental triggers.Methods. We summarized the clinical and laboratory features of 9 patients in Germany and Austria who developed thrombosis and thrombocytopenia events following AZD1222 vaccination. Serum from four patients was used to test for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, both by immunoassay and by platelet activation assays performed in the presence of heparin, PF4, or both.Results. The 9 patients (8 female; median age, 36 [range, 22—49) presented with thrombosis beginning 4 to 16 days post-vaccination: 7 patients had cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), 1 had pulmonary embolism, and 1 had splanchnic vein thrombosis and CVT; 4 patients died. None had received heparin prior to symptom onset. All four patients tested strongly positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies by immunoassay; all 4 patients tested strongly positive in the platelet activation assay in the presence of PF4 independently of heparin. Platelet activation was inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, Fc receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody, and intravenous immunoglobulin.Conclusions. The AZD1222 vaccine is associated with development of a prothrombotic disorder that clinically resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia but which shows a different serological profile.

Download Full-text

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Anti-Platelet Factor 4 Antibody Responses Induced by COVID-19 Disease and ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination

10.21203/rs.3.rs-404769/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Andreas Greinacher ◽

Kathleen Selleng ◽

Julia Mayerle ◽

Raghavendra Palankar ◽

Jan Wesche ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Activation ◽

Molecular Mimicry ◽

Cross Reactivity ◽

Platelet Factor 4 ◽

Antibody Responses ◽

Spike Protein ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Activation Assay ◽

Heparin Complexes

Abstract Background: Some recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca develop antibody-mediated vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), associated with cerebral venous and other unusual thrombosis resembling autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A prothrombotic predisposition is also observed in Covid-19. We explored whether antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced by Covid-19 cross-react with platelet factor 4 (PF4/CXLC4), the protein targeted in both VITT and autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.Methods: Immunogenic epitopes of PF4 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were compared via prediction tools and 3D modelling software (IMED, SIM, MacMYPOL). Sera from 222 PCR-confirmed Covid-19 patients from five European centers were tested by PF4/heparin ELISA, heparin-dependent and PF4-dependent platelet activation assays. Immunogenic reactivity of purified anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from patients with VITT were tested against recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Results: Three motifs within the spike protein sequence share a potential immunogenic epitope with PF4. Nineteen of 222 (8.6%) Covid-19 patient sera tested positive in the IgG-specific PF4/heparin ELISA, none of which showed platelet activation in the heparin-dependent activation assay, including 10 (4.5%) of the 222 Covid-19 patients who developed thromboembolic complications. Purified anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from two VITT patients did not show cross-reactivity to recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Conclusions: The antibody responses to PF4 in SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca differ. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein do not cross-react with PF4 or PF4/heparin complexes through molecular mimicry. These findings make it very unlikely that the intended vaccine-induced immune response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein would itself induce VITT.

Download Full-text

A Platelet Factor 4-Dependent Platelet Activation Assay Facilitates Early Detection of Pathogenic Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibodies

CHEST Journal ◽

10.1016/j.chest.2017.06.001 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 152 (4) ◽

pp. e77-e80 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Curtis G. Jones ◽

Shannon M. Pechauer ◽

Brian R. Curtis ◽

Daniel W. Bougie ◽

Mehraboon S. Irani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Early Detection ◽

Platelet Activation ◽

Platelet Factor 4 ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Activation Assay

Download Full-text

Defibrotide Does Not Cross-React with HIT Antibodies. Implications in the Management of HIT.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.1054.1054 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 1054-1054

Author(s):

Jawed Fareed ◽

Debra A. Hoppensteadt ◽

Massimo Iacobelli ◽

Jeanine M. Walenga

Keyword(s):

Platelet Activation ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Serotonin Release ◽

Antithrombotic Agent ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Prolonged Incubation ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Orally Bioavailable ◽

Microparticle Formation ◽

Heparin Exposure

Abstract Defibrotide is a mammalian DNA derived antithrombotic and anti-ischemic agent that does not produce systemic anticoagulation. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune disease related to heparin exposure, in which patients are at risk of developing life- and limb-threatening thrombosis. Studies were performed to determine whether defibrotide cross-reacts with HIT antibodies. Sera from 141 clinically confirmed HIT patients were tested for platelet activation in the presence of defibrotide (1 – 100 μg/ml) and unfractionated heparin (1 – 100 μg/ml). 103 sera (73%) produced platelet aggregation and serotonin release activities with heparin. Only 4 samples (2%) showed a weak reactivity with defibrotide which was eliminated by heparinase treatment indicating heparin contamination in the patient sample. Further studies revealed that defibrotide does not complex with platelet factor 4 (PF4), and that prolonged incubation of defibrotide with platelet rich plasma does not mobilize PF4. Studies of patients treated with extended dosing of intravenous or oral defibrotide (n=270) demonstrated that HIT antibodies are not generated with defibrotide treatment. Studies carried out on the effect of purified IgG from HIT patients revealed that defibrotide blunts platelet activation and microparticle formation as measured by flow cytometry. These studies suggest that defibrotide may be a useful antithrombotic agent for the management of patients with HIT. Moreover, unlike heparin, defibrotide does not promote platelet activation, rather it is capable of suppressing the hypercoagulable state associated with HIT. Defibrotide is orally bioavailable and can be used for extended anticoagulant management of HIT patients.

Download Full-text

Low Level Platelet-Activating Antibodies in Patients Suspected of Having Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia but Testing Negative in the ”Gold Standard” Functional Test

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2757.2757 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2757-2757

Author(s):

Ishac Nazi ◽

Donald M Arnold ◽

James W Smith ◽

Theodore E. Warkentin ◽

Jane C Moore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Activation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Heparin Therapy ◽

Serotonin Release ◽

Patient Specific ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Increased Sensitivity ◽

Clinical Conditions

Abstract Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common drug reaction that causes arterial or venous thrombosis as a result of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating antibodies, against complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, cause intense platelet activation, ultimately leading to an increased risk of thrombosis, limb-loss and even death. Most patients exposed to heparin will produce non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies while only a small number will produce platelet-activating and HIT-causing antibodies (pathogenic HIT antibodies). Among HIT tests, the functional assays, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA), correlate best with the disease because they can specifically identify the pathogenic HIT antibodies whereas the enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) cannot. We have previously shown that anti-PF4/heparin antibody production precedes thrombocytopenia in HIT patients (Warkentin et al., Blood 2009 113: 4963-4969) possibly indicating the need for a threshold plasma level of pathogenic HIT antibody, among other factors, to cause the disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of low levels of pathogenic HIT antibodies in samples from patients suspected of HIT who had detectable anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in the EIA (EIA-positive), but who did not have platelet-activating antibodies in the standard SRA (SRA-negative). Methods: We used an in-house IgG-specific EIA to detect the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (EIA-positive: OD405nm> 0.45) and the standard SRA to detect the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies (SRA-positive: release >20% with 0.1-0.3 IU/mL of unfractionated heparin). We developed an enhanced SRA (eSRA) by adding increasing concentrations of exogenous PF4 (0-100 μg/mL) to detect sub-threshold levels of platelet activating antibodies undetectable in the standard SRA (eSRA-positive: release >20%). Samples tested were referred for HIT testing by the McMaster Platelet Immunology Laboratory (Hamilton, Canada). Results: Sera from healthy individuals (n=10) and from suspected HIT patients with a negative anti-PF4/heparin EIA (n=15) did not demonstrate platelet activation in the eSRA at any dose of exogenous PF4 added. SRA-positive sera (n = 7), diluted sufficiently that they were non-reactive in the standard SRA, demonstrated PF4 dose-dependent platelet activation in the eSRA. This confirmed the increased sensitivity of the eSRA in detecting low-titre platelet-activating antibodies. Reactivity in the eSRA was inhibited by high heparin (100 U/mL) and by blocking the platelet FcgRIIa receptor with the monoclonal antibody IV.3. We then tested samples (n=24) referred for HIT testing that were positive in the anti-PF4/heparin EIA (optical densities OD405nm 0.7 to 2.4) but negative in the standard SRA. Heparin-dependent platelet activation (20-99% release) was demonstrated in 11 of 24 (46%) in the eSRA. This reactivity directly correlated with the amount of PF4 added to the platelets (optimal concentration of PF4 12.5 - 100 μg/mL) but not with the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. In further investigations, we concentrated (4-fold) 7 of the 11 eSRA-positive samples in an attempt to increase the concentration of the antibodies. Of those 7 samples, 5 (71%) became positive in the standard SRA upon testing of the concentrated sample. Conclusions: These data indicate that low-titre platelet-activating antibodies may be found in some patients suspected of having HIT that test negative in the standard SRA irrespective of the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. The immune response during heparin therapy can produce both families of pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but it is the titre of the pathogenic antibody that may be necessary for platelet activation. Perhaps under permissive clinical conditions and with patient-specific factors, the titre of the pathogenic HIT antibodies may increase and lead to HIT. Disclosures Warkentin: Pfizer Canada: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; W.L. Gore: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with thrombotic microangiopathy

Hämostaseologie ◽

10.5482/hamo-13-03-0012 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 33 (02) ◽

pp. 160-163 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

I. Binet ◽

G. Nair ◽

U. Schanz ◽

J.-D. Studt

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Unfractionated Heparin ◽

Platelet Activation ◽

Thrombotic Microangiopathy ◽

Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Plasma Exchange Therapy ◽

Activation Assay ◽

Possible Cause ◽

Persistent Thrombocytopenia

SummarySome cases of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) are refractory to plasma exchange therapy (PE) with persistence or recurrence of thrombocytopenia. We report two patients suffering from TMA of different aetiologies (associated with disseminated malignancy, typical haemolytic uraemic syndrome) with recurrent or persistent thrombocytopenia despite adequate therapy including PE. Since both patients were exposed to unfractionated heparin, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) was suspected as a cause. Pretest probabilities for HIT were intermediate. ELISA for PF4/heparin antibodies was strongly positive in both cases, and HIT was confirmed by heparin-induced platelet activation assay. Anticoagulation with lepirudin was initiated, with subsequent rapid increase of the platelet count.TMA might represent a predisposition for HIT. This could be due to TMA-related platelet activation with increased PF4 release. In TMA patients exposed to heparin and with refractory or rapidly recurrent thrombocytopenia HIT should always be considered as a possible cause.

Download Full-text

Characterization of New Monoclonal PF4-Specific Antibodies as Useful Tools for Studies on Typical and Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1717078 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Caroline Vayne ◽

Thi-Huong Nguyen ◽

Jérôme Rollin ◽

Noémie Charuel ◽

Anne Poupon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Activation ◽

Single Molecule ◽

Binding Sites ◽

Serotonin Release ◽

Titration Calorimetry ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Platelet Factor ◽

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽

Activation Assay ◽

Group 3

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is typically caused by platelet-activating immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (Abs) against platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexed with heparin (H). Much less frequent “autoimmune” HIT is distinguished from typical HIT by platelet activation without heparin and the presence of both anti-PF4/H and anti-PF4 IgG. We developed three murine monoclonal anti-PF4 Abs with a human Fc-part, 1E12, 1C12, and 2E1, resembling autoimmune HIT Abs. Objectives To characterize 1E12, 1C12, and 2E1 in comparison to the heparin-dependent monoclonal anti-PF4/H Abs 5B9 and KKO, and polyclonal Abs from patients with typical HIT (group-2) and autoimmune HIT (group-3). Methods Interactions of Abs with PF4 and PF4/H were studied by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay, single-molecule force spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and dynamic light scattering. Serotonin release assay and heparin-induced platelet activation assay were used to assess platelet activation. The binding sites of monoclonal Abs on PF4 were predicted in silico (MAbTope method). Results 1C12, 1E12, and 2E1 displayed higher affinity for PF4/H complexes than 5B9 and KKO, comparable to human group-3 Abs. Only 1C12, 1E12, 2E1, and group-3 Abs formed large complexes with native PF4, and activated platelets without heparin. The predicted binding sites of 1C12, 1E12, and 2E1 on PF4 differed from those of KKO and 5B9, but were close to each other. 2E1 exhibited unique bivalent binding, involving its antigen recognition site to PF4 and charge-dependent interactions with heparin. Conclusion 1C12, 1E12, and 2E1 are tools for studying the pathophysiology of autoimmune HIT. 2E1 provides evidence for a new binding mechanism of HIT Abs.

Download Full-text