Lin28B/Let-7 Axis Regulates Multiple Myeloma Proliferation By Enhancing c-Myc and Ras Survival Pathways

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 273-273
Author(s):  
Salomon Manier ◽  
John T Powers ◽  
Antonio Sacco ◽  
Michaela R Reagan ◽  
Michele Moschetta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, due to their ability to target mRNAs involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Lin28B is an RNA binding protein that regulates Let-7 miRNA maturation. Lin28B and Let-7 have been described to act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, respectively, as demonstrated both in solid cancer and hematologic malignancies. However, the role of the Lin28B/Let-7 axis in Multiple Myeloma (MM) has not been studied. Method Lin28B level expression in MM patients was studied using previously published gene expression profiling (GEP) datasets. Let-7 expression levels were assessed in CD138+ primary MM cells and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) by using PCR, as well as in circulating exosomes using miRNA array (Nanostring® Technology). Exosomes were collected from both normal and MM peripheral blood, using ultracentrifugation; and further studied by using electron microscopy and immunogold labeling for the detection of CD63 and CD81. The knockdown of Lin28B was performed on MM cell lines (U266, MM.1S, MOLP-8) by using a lentiviral Lin28B shRNA. Gain- and loss-of function studies for Let-7 were performed using Let-7 mimic and anti-Let-7 transfection in MM cell lines (MM1S, U266) and primary BMSCs. Cell proliferation has been evaluated by using thymidine assays. Effects of Let-7 and Lin28B on signaling cascades have been evaluated by western blot. Results Two independent GEP datasets (GSE16558; GSE2658) were analyzed for Lin28B expression, showing a significantly higher level in MM patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, high Lin28B levels correlated with a shorter overall survival (p = 0.0226). We next found that the Let-7 family members are significantly down-regulated in MM primary cells, particularly Let-7a and b (5 fold change, p < 0.05), as demonstrated by using qRT-PCR. Similarly, miRNA arrays showed a lower expression of Let-7-related miRNAs in circulating exosomes obtained from MM patients compared to healthy individuals. We further dissected the functional relevance of Lin28B in MM cells, by performing Lin28 knockdown (KD) in MM cell lines (U266, MOLP-8). This led to a significant decrease in MM cell proliferation associated with G1 phase cell cycle arrest. This was supported by up-regulation of Let-7 and down-regulation of c-Myc, Ras and Cyclin D1 in Lin28 KD MM cells. To further prove that Lin28B-dependent effects on MM cells are mediated by Let7, we next showed that let-7 gain- and loss-of-function studies regulate MM cell proliferation and Myc expression. Lin28B regulation in MM cells is dependent on Let-7, as demonstrated by an increase of both cell proliferation and c-Myc expression after anti-Let-7 transfection in the Lin28B KD cells. We therefore studied the regulation of Let-7 in MM cells through the interaction with BMSCs. Let-7 expression levels were significantly lower in BMSCs obtained from MM patients compared to healthy donors. Interestingly, the Let-7 expression level in MM cells was increased after co-culture with Let-7 over-expressing BMSCs, associated with a decrease of both cell proliferation and c-Myc expression. This suggests a potential transfer of Let-7 from BMSCs to MM cells. Conclusion This work describes a new signaling pathway involving Lin28B, Let-7, Myc and Ras in MM. Let-7 expression in MM cells is also regulated through the interaction of MM cells with BMSCs, leading to cell proliferation and Myc regulation in MM. Interference with this pathway might offer therapeutic perspectives. Disclosures: Leleu: CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Daley:Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; MPM Capital: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; iPierian: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Solasia, KK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Onyx: Advisoryboard Other; BMS: Advisory board, Advisory board Other, Research Funding; Noxxon: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1729-1729
Author(s):  
Melissa G Ooi ◽  
Robert O'Connor ◽  
Jana Jakubikova ◽  
Justine Meiller ◽  
Steffen Klippel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1729 Poster Board I-755 Background Multidrug transporters are energy-dependent transmembrane proteins which can efflux a broad range of anticancer drugs and thereby play a role in resistance to the actions of substrate agents. Classically, three transporters, p-glycoprotein (Pgp; MDR-1; ABCB1), multidrug resistant protein-1 (MRP-1; ABCC1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; MXR; ABCG2), have been found to have the broadest substrate specificity and a strong correlation with drug resistance in vitro and in vivo in many models and forms of cancer. We have sought to characterize the interaction of bortezomib with these transporters and thereby explore the potential for these agents to play a role in resistance. Bortezomib is a novel proteosome inhibitor with significant activity in multiple myeloma, although subsets of patients remain refractory to the activity of the drug. Hence, better characterization of the interactions of this drug with classical resistance mechanisms may identify improved treatment applications. Methods and Results We investigated the role of these transporters by using isogenic cell line models which are resistant due to overexpression of a particular transporter: DLKP lung cancer cell line that overexpresses MRP-1; DLKP-A which overexpresses Pgp; and DLKP-SQ-Mitox which overexpresses BCRP. DLKP-A cells exhibited a 4.6-fold decrease in responsiveness to bortezomib compared to parental DLKP cells. In DLKP-SQ-Mitox, bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity was comparable to DLKP. When bortezomib was combined with elacridar, a Pgp and BCRP inhibitor, significant synergy was evident in DLKP-A (100% viable cells with single agent treatment versus 11% with the combination), but not DLKP-SQ-Mitox. Sulindac, an MRP-1 inhibitor, combined with bortezomib failed to produce any synergy in MRP-1 positive DLKP cells. Conversely, combination assays of Pgp substrate cytotoxics such as doxorubicin with Bortezomib were largely additive in nature. This indicates that bortezomib has little, if any, direct Pgp inhibitory activity, as combinations of a traditional Pgp inhibitor (such as elacridar) and doxorubicin would show marked synergy rather than just an additive effect in Pgp positive cells. To further characterize the extent of this interaction with Pgp, we conducted cytotoxicity assays in cell lines with varying levels of Pgp overexpression. NCI/Adr-res (ovarian cancer, high Pgp overexpression), RPMI-Dox40 (multiple myeloma, moderate Pgp overexpression) and A549-taxol (lung cancer, low Pgp overexpression). The combination of bortezomib and elacridar that produced the most synergy was in cell lines expressing moderate to high levels of Pgp expression. Cell lines with lower Pgp expression produced an additive cytotoxicity. We next examined whether bortezomib had any direct effect on Pgp expression. In RPMI-Dox40 cells, Pgp expression is reduced in a time-dependent manner with bortezomib treatment. Conclusions Our studies therefore show that bortezomib is a substrate for Pgp but not the other drug efflux pumps. In tumor cells expressing high levels of Pgp, the efficacy of bortezomib is synergistically enhanced by combinations with a Pgp inhibitor, while bortezomib treatment itself can reduce the expression of Pgp. This study suggests that in the subset of patients with advanced multiple myeloma or solid tumors which express high levels of Pgp, inhibition of its function could contribute to enhanced responsiveness to bortezomib. Disclosures Richardson: millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, speakers bureau up to 7/1/09; MLNM: speakers bureau up to 7/1/09. Mitsiades:Millennium Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb : Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck &Co: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: licensing royalties ; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono : Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest AG: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1856-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Amy O’Sullivan ◽  
Silvana Lalo ◽  
Carrie Kruppa ◽  
Diane Gardner ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3852-3852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús F. San-Miguel ◽  
Orhan Sezer ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Andreas Guenther ◽  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3852 Poster Board III-788 Introduction Panobinostat (LBH589) is a highly potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi), inclusive of HDAC6, which disrupts aggresome function, promotes accumulation of cytotoxic misfolded protein aggregates and triggers myeloma cell death. Combination of pan-DAC and protease inhibition by co-treatment with panobinostat (PAN) and bortezomib (BTZ) has demonstrated synergistic cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo in multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines and may provide increased efficacy in patients with MM. The primary objective of this Phase Ib trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral PAN when combined with BTZ in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Safety, tolerability, PK/PD, and preliminary efficacy are the secondary objectives. Results A total of 29 patients have been enrolled into four completed dosing Cohorts: (I) 10 mg PAN (TIW) + 1 mg/m2 BTZ (i.v., Days 1, 4, 8, 11) during a 21-day cycle; (II) 20 mg PAN + 1 mg/m2 BTZ; (III) 20 mg PAN + 1.3 mg/m2 BTZ; (IV) 30 mg PAN + 1.3 mg/m2 BTZ. Enrollment into Cohort V is ongoing at 25 mg PAN + 1.3 mg/m2 BTZ with 6 patients accrued to date. In Cohorts I– IV, the median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–6); 25 patients had at least one prior auto-SCT. Of 16 BTZ pretreated patients, 11 were refractory to their last prior BTZ-based therapy (9 with PD, 2 with SD on BTZ). Median time on study has been 97 days (range 7–424). Overall, the combination of PAN and BTZ was safe and tolerated in Cohorts I - III with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (Gr 4 afebrile neutropenia) in Cohort II. In Cohort IV, four DLTs were reported: two Gr 4 thrombocytopenias,(requiring platelet transfusions), Gr 3 pneumonia, and Gr 3 fatigue. In the subsequent Cohort V, PAN dose was de-escalated. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) have been frequent, including Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia (25), neutropenia (18), and anemia (6). Non-hematologic AEs included: diarrhea (18), fever (15), nausea (14), fatigue (14), and asthenia (11). A total of 1,778 ECGs were centrally, reviewed with neither QTcF prolongation from baseline >60 msec nor absolute QTcF duration >480 msec noted. Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia was manageable by dose modification and platelet transfusion; two patients only discontinued for this AE in Cohorts I – III and no hemorrhagic events were reported in association with thrombocytopenia. Encouraging clinical efficacy was observed in all four Cohorts, with 14 responders (partial response [PR] or better) in 28 evaluable patients (50%), including 4 with immunofixation (IF) negative complete response (CR). Four additional patients achieved minor responses, resulting in 64% overall response rate. Responses were also seen in the subset of patients refractory to prior BTZ, suggesting a strong clinical correlate for synergism of the PAN/BTZ combination: 6 of 10 (60%) BTZ-refractory evaluable pts responded, including 4 PR and 2 MR (see Table for details). Dexamethasone (DEX) was introduced at Cycle 2 (or 3) in 9 pts; 11 of 18 pts with a response did not receive DEX, including several pts refractory to BTZ. All 15 patients in Cohorts III and IV treated with the full registered dose of BTZ (1.3 mg/m2) in combination with PAN 20 mg experienced a clinical benefit; however, toxicity in Cohort IV was not acceptable. Conclusion The encouraging clinical anti-myeloma synergism of the PAN and BTZ combination in this trial warrants further clinical investigation in patients with refractory and relapsed MM. Given the frequency of thrombocytopenia and dose adjustments, the dosing schedule in subsequent Phase II/III studies will be modified to take the safety profile and dose-reduction/-interruption pattern into account. Disclosures: San-Miguel: Novartis: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria; J&J: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria. Sezer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Siegel:Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Speakers Bureau. Guenther:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mateos:Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria. Cavo:Novartis: Honoraria. Blade:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Boccadoro:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Bengoudifa:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Klebsattel:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Bourquelot:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Anderson:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1951-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2999-2999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
Diana Cirstea ◽  
Loredana Santo ◽  
Doris M Nabikejje ◽  
Kishan Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2999 Multiple myeloma (MM) is a treatable but incurable hematological malignancy and novel targeted therapies are under investigation. MM is characterized by dysregulation of the cell cycle, consequent to the overexpression of cyclins and their related kinases, the cyclins dependent kinases (CDK), a group of Ser/Thr proteine kinases. CDKs represent a promising therapeutic target, and inhibitors have been developed for anticancer treatment. We have previously studied seliciclib in the context of MM. CYC065, a second generation CDK inhibitor is the more potent derivative of seliciclib. It is mainly active on CDK 2, 5 and 9, involved in progression of the cell cycle and protein transcription. It has already shown promising results in preclinical studies in breast cancer and acute leukemia. We tested CYC065 in in vitro experiments in MM. Our preliminary data in 7 MM cell lines showed cytotoxicity of CYC065, both in MM cell lines sensitive as well as resistant to conventional chemotherapy, with an IC50 ranging between 0.06 and 2μ M, at 24 and 48h. Tritiated thymidine uptake assay confirmed the antiproliferative effects of CYC065 in MM, and its ability to overcome the growth advantage conferred by co-culture with bone marrow stromal cells derived from MM patients, and cytokines like interleukin 6 (10ng/ml) and insulin like growth factor-1 (50ng/ml). The anti-proliferative effect was evident both at 24 and 48h, starting at concentrations as low as 0.015μ M. The AnnexinV/PI assay in the MM1.s cell line confirmed CYC065's ability to induce apoptosis in a time dependent manner starting at 9 hours of treatment, at a concentration of 0.125 μ M, inducing 82% of apoptosis after 48h of exposure. Cell cycle analysis in the same MM1.s cell line showed an increase of subG1 phase, starting at 9 hours of treatment, at 0.125 μ M of CYC065. Preliminary results of western blot analysis confirmed the apoptotic effect of CYC065 in the MM1s cell line, highlighted by the cleavage of caspase 3, 8, 9 and PARP. The compound was tested in primary CD138+ cells isolated from three refractory MM patients, confirming its efficacy at 0.125 μ M, both at 24 and 48h. Comparative analysis in PBMCs from normal donors, for the evaluation of the drug toxicity is ongoing and will be presented. In conclusion our preliminary data confirm the efficacy of CYC065 in MM cell lines and primary MM cells, at nanomolar concentrations. Ongoing mechanistic and in vivo studies will delineate its role in the now increasing spectrum of CDK inhibitors in MM and better define its potential for clinical development in MM. Disclosures: Green: Cyclacel: Employment. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Scadden:Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2520-2520
Author(s):  
Hua Wang ◽  
Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani ◽  
Zhiqiang Wang ◽  
Jiexin Zhang ◽  
Heather Yan Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib and carfilzomib are an important part of our current chemotherapeutic armamentarium against multiple myeloma, and have improved outcomes in the up-front, relapsed, and relapsed/refractory settings. Their efficacy has been demonstrated both as single agents, and as part of rationally designed combination regimens, but they are at this time used empirically, since biomarkers to identify patients who would most or least benefit from their application have not been clinically validated. Moreover, the vast majority of patients eventually develop drug-resistant disease which precludes further proteasome inhibitor use through mechanisms that have not been fully elucidated. Methods We compared gene expression profiles (GEPs) of a panel of bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell lines and their vehicle-treated, drug-naïve counterparts to identify significant changes associated with drug resistance. The list of genes whose expression was changed by at least 2-fold was compared with independent RNA interference studies whose goal was to identify genes whose suppression conferred drug resistance. Further validation of genes of interest was pursued in a panel of myeloma cell lines, and in clinically annotated GEP databases. Results Suppression of PTPROt expression was noted in bortezomib-resistant RPMI 8226 and ANBL-6 myeloma cells compared to isogenic, drug-naïve controls, and this was confirmed by quantitative PCR. Overexpression of PTRPOt in RPMI 8226, ANBL-6 and other myeloma cell lines was by itself sufficient to increase the level of apoptotic, sub-G0/G1 cells compared to vector controls, or cells expressing a phosphatase-dead PTPROt mutant. Moreover, PTPROt enhanced the ability of bortezomib to reduce myeloma cell viability, in association with increased activation of caspases 8 and 9. Exogenous over-expression of PTPROt was found to reduce the activation status of Akt, a known anti-apoptotic pathway that reduces bortezomib activity, based on Western blotting with antibodies to phospho-Akt (Ser473), and Akt kinase activity assays. Notably, we also found that exogenous over-expression of PTPROt resulted in increased expression levels of p27Kip1. Interestingly, array CGH data from studies of myeloma cell lines and primary cells showed that the PTPROt gene was located in a genomic region with a high propensity for loss. Analysis of the Total Therapy databases of GEP and patient outcomes available on the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Portal showed that higher than median expression of PTPROt was associated with better long-term survival (P=0.0175). Finally, analysis of the Millennium Pharmaceuticals database of studies of bortezomib in the relapsed and relapsed/refractory setting showed high PTRPOt expression was more frequently seen in patients who achieved complete remission (P<0.01), and was associated with a better median overall survival (P=0.0003). Conclusions Taken together, the data support the possibility that high expression of PTPROt is a good prognostic factor for response to bortezomib-containing therapies, and that this may occur through modulation by PTPROt of the Akt pathway. Moreover, they suggest that strategies to enhance the expression of PTPROt should be investigated to restore bortezomib sensitivity in patients with proteasome inhibitor-resistant disease. Disclosures: Orlowski: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Merz ◽  
Almuth Maria Anni Merz ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Lei Wei ◽  
Ahmed Belal ◽  
...  

Introduction: Therapy and immune mediated processes are associated with clonal evolution in multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on plasma cells (PC) from bone marrow aspirates of the iliac crest (BM) and corresponding osteolytic lesions (OL) to investigate spatial heterogeneity in patients with newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Next generation flow (NGF) and T-cell receptor sequencing (TCRseq) were performed to investigate the immunogenomic landscape surrounding malignant PC. Methods: In a prospective trial, 18 patients (NDMM: n=10; RRMM: n=8) consented to an imaging-guided biopsy of an OL in addition to the regular BM sampling. At inclusion, 37 different locations were biopsied. Follow-up samples were obtained from 5 patients in remission after therapy. After CD138+ selection, PC were subjected to WES and scRNA-seq (Chromium, 10x genomics). TCRseq was performed using multiplex PCR (ImmunoSEQ, Adaptive biotechnologies) on the CD138- fraction. For scRNA-seq data analyses, Cell Ranger (v3.1.0) and the Seurat R toolkit (v3.1) were used. TCRseq data were analyzed with immunoSEQ ANALYZER (v3.0) and the immunarch R toolkit (v0.6.6.). NGF was performed to study subsets of T-, B-, NK- and dendritic cells (DC). Results: Median PC infiltration was higher in OL compared to random BM (50.0% vs 12.5%, p=0.041). WES revealed more mutations in RRMM compared to NDMM (median; range: 189;120-523 vs 71;23-136, p&lt;0.001). Based on mutational profiles from WES, 4 of 18 patients showed a branching evolution in PC isolated from OL. Three of the 4 patients had RRMM and one patient with NDMM had a prior history of solitary plasmacytoma. PC were obtained from OL with adjacent extramedullary disease (EMD) in 3 of 4 patients with branching evolution. Among site-specific mutations, we found in one patient two distinct BRAF mutations: V600E in the BM and G469R in the OL. An additional NRAS mutation (G12D) was found in the OL. BRAF G469R and NRAS G12D cause resistance to BRAF inhibitors, although this patient was naïve to BRAF-inhibitors. Clonal evolution was also reflected by chromosomal aberrations, including site-specific chromothripsis of chromosome 1 in a patient with RRMM. Even in patients without spatially divergent clones as detected by WES, scRNA-seq of more than 150,000 PC from 10 patients and 21 different locations revealed multiple clones. Distinct PC clones were identified by differential expression of genes associated with homing to the BM (CXCR4), malignant transformation (Jun/Fos, CD27, CD79a), apoptosis (BCL-2) bone disease (DKK1) and LAMP-5. In a patient with NDMM in remission after induction therapy, scRNA-seq demonstrated the emergence of a PC clone characterized by the overexpression of Interferon-induced genes (ISG15, IFI27, IFI44L) compared to the initially predominant PC clones. Next, we investigated spatiotemporal differences of immune cells. Estimation of median TCR richness using an abundance-based estimator (Chao1) revealed significantly lower values in patients with RRMM (120444; 57706-212744) compared to NDMM (389341; 50318-525082, p&lt;0.001) and nine healthy individuals (460278; 138326-696419, p&lt;0.001). No significant differences were found for TCR clonality as indicated by Simpson's D. While longitudinal tracking of TCR clones at primary diagnosis showed no clonal expansion after treatment, induction therapy restored sample richness in patients with NDMM to levels of healthy individuals (p=0.61). Overlap analysis showed a high concordance of TCR repertoires from OL and random BM with Morisita indices ranging in 90% of patients from 0.80 to 0.95. Nevertheless, significant site-specific expansion of TCR clones was detected. In accordance with TCRseq, NGF showed in the BM of patients with RRMM more regulatory T-cells (p=0.048) and less myeloid DC (p=0.024), Th9 cells and CD8 effector memory T-cells compared to NDMM. Conclusion: We report the first prospective clinical trial to investigate spatiotemporal immunogenomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma as assessed by WES and scRNA-seq of PC and NGF and TCRseq of the non-PC compartment. We demonstrate spatial evolution and reduced TCR diversity especially in patients with RRMM and/or EMD. ScRNA-seq adds another layer of complexity compared to WES and helps identifying how PC create an immune suppressive BM niche. Disclosures Merz: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Takeda: Honoraria. Block:GlaxoSmithKline LLC: Current Employment. McCarthy:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Magenta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board , Research Funding is to Roswell Park, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Starton: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hillengass:Adaptive, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncotracker, Takeda: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 138-138
Author(s):  
John Daly ◽  
Subhashis Sarkar ◽  
Alessandro Natoni ◽  
Robert Henderson ◽  
Dawn Swan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Evading Natural Killer (NK) cell-mediated immunosurveillance is key to the development of Multiple Myeloma (MM). Recent attention has focused on the role of hypersialylation in facilitating immune-evasion of NK cells. Abnormal cell surface sialylation is considered a hallmark of cancer and we have implicated hypersialylation in MM disease progression. Certain sialylated glycans can act as ligands for the sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglec) receptors expressed by NK cells (Siglec-7 and Siglec-9). These ITIM motif-containing inhibitory receptors transmit an inhibitory signal upon sialic acid engagement. We hypothesized that desialylation of MM cells or targeted interruption of Siglec expression could lead to enhanced NK cell mediated cytotoxicity of MM cells. Methodology: MM cells were treated with the sialidase neuraminidase prior to co-culture with primary NK (PNK) cells. MM cells were treated with 300µM 3Fax-Neu5Ac (sialyltransferase inhibitor) for 3 days prior to co-cultures with PNK cells. PNK cells were expanded, IL-2 activated (500U/ml) overnight, or naïve (resting). Primary MM samples/MM cell lines were screened with Siglec-7/9 chimeras (10µg/ml). PNK (IL-2 activated) cells were stained with anti-Siglec-7 and anti-Siglec-9 antibodies. Siglec-7 was targeted for knockout (KO) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, a pre-designed guideRNA and the MaxCyteGT transfection system. MM cells were treated with 10µg/ml of Daratumumab prior to co-culture with expanded PNK cells. Results: Using recombinant Siglec-7/9 chimeras a panel of MM cell lines (MM1S, RPMI-8226, H929, JJN3 and U266) were shown to express ligands for Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 (&gt;85%, n=3). Primary MM cells isolated from BM of newly diagnosed (n=3) and relapsed patients (n=2) were also shown to express Siglec-7 ligands (72.5±17.5%, 36.5% respectively). PNK cells express Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 (94.3±3.3% and 61±8.8% respectively, n=6). Desialylation of the MM cell lines JJN3 and H929 using neuraminidase significantly enhanced killing of MM cells by healthy donor (HD) derived PNK cells (expanded, IL-2 activated and naïve, n=7) at multiple effector:target (E:T) cell ratios. Furthermore, de-sialylation of JJN3 and H929 using neuraminidase resulted in increased NK cell degranulation (CD107α expression), compared to a glycobuffer control (n=7). De-sialylation, using 300µM 3Fax-Neu5Ac, resulted in strongly enhanced killing of MM1S by expanded HD-derived PNK cells at multiple E:T ratios (n=5, p&lt;0.01 at 0.5:1, p&lt;0.001 at 1:1, p&lt;0.01 at 2.5:1). Furthermore, CD38 expression on H929 MM cells significantly increased after treatment with 300µM 3Fax-Neu5Ac for 3 days (p&lt;0.01, n=3). In a cytotoxicity assay, expanded PNK cell-mediated antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of H929 MM cells pre-treated with Daratumumab (anti-CD38 moAb) and 3Fax-Neu5Ac was significantly higher than H929 cells pre-treated with Dara (p&lt;0.05 at 0.5:1, p&lt;0.01 at 1:1) or 3Fax-Neu5Ac (p&lt;0.01 at 0.5:1, p&lt;0.01 at 1:1) alone (n=5). Using CRISPR/Cas9, over 50% complete KO of Siglec-7 was observed on expanded PNK cells, yet did not result in enhanced NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against either H929 or JJN3 (n=7). Siglec-9 KO using CRISPR/Cas9 is ongoing. Discussion: Hypersialylation of MM cells facilitates immune evasion and targeted removal of sialic acid strongly enhances the cytotoxicity of NK cells against MM. However, to date the role of Siglecs remains inconclusive. Nevertheless, our data suggest that targeted desialylation is a novel therapeutic strategy worth exploring in MM. In particular, upregulation of CD38 provides a strong rationale for combinatory strategies employing targeted desialylation with CD38 moAbs such as Daratumumab, with the goal of maximizing ADCC. Disclosures Sarkar: Onkimmune: Research Funding. O'Dwyer:Onkimmune: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; GlycoMimetics Inc: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1266-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Knurowski ◽  
Karen Clegg ◽  
Nigel Brooks ◽  
Fay Ashby ◽  
Neil A Pegg ◽  
...  

Background CCS1477 is a first in class potent, selective and orally bioavailable inhibitor of the bromodomains of p300 and CBP, two closely related histone acetyl transferases with oncogenic roles in haematological malignancies. In pre-clinical studies, CCS1477 was found to be a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cell lines. In primary patient AML blast cells CCS1477 inhibited proliferation through a combination of cell cycle arrest at the G1/S transition and an induction of differentiation (up-regulation of CD11b and CD86). CCS1477 has significant anti-tumour activity, inducing tumour regressions in xenograft models of AML and MM. These effects were accompanied by significant reductions in tumour MYC and IRF4 expression. Additionally, there are molecular features of certain haematological malignancies that are likely to increase the sensitivity to p300/CBP inhibition with CCS1477. For example, in B-cell lymphomas there are frequent loss of function mutations in CBP that are associated with heightened sensitivity to pre-clinical inhibition of corresponding non-mutated p300. CCS1477 represents a novel and differentiated approach to inhibiting cell proliferation and survival and offers a potential new therapeutic option for patients who have relapsed or are refractory to current standard of care therapies in AML, MM or NHL. Study Design and Methods This study is the first time that CCS1477 is being dosed in patients with haematological malignancies. The Phase I/IIa study aims to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule(s) of CCS1477 and investigate clinical activity of CCS1477 monotherapy in patients with haematological malignancies. This study will also characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CCS1477 and explore potential biological activity by assessing pharmacodynamic and exploratory biomarkers. The trial aims to enrol approximately 90 patients and is currently recruiting in the UK with plans to open additional sites in the USA. Key inclusion criteria include patients with confirmed (per standard disease specific diagnostic criteria), relapsed or refractory haematological malignancies (AML, MM and NHL). Patients must have received standard therapy which for the majority of therapeutic indications is at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Single dose and steady state pharmacokinetics will be determined in all patients. AML response will be measured in bone marrow samples. Myeloma response will be evaluated according to the 'International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria' based on changes in M protein in blood and/or urine, changes in serum free light chains if measurable, and changes on imaging and/or bone marrow if applicable and according to the guidelines. In NHL patients, tumour assessments will be done for measurable disease, non-measurable disease, and new lesions on CT (or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and/or combined with visual assessment of [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for response assessment per recent International Working Group consensus criteria (RECIL 2017), until progression The study will begin with two parallel monotherapy dose-escalation arms; Arm 1: Relapsed or refractory NHL and MM; Arm2: Relapsed or refractory AML/high-risk MDS. Once a recommended phase 2 dose/schedule is reached, three monotherapy expansion arms will be opened in AML/high-risk MDS (15 patients), MM (15 patients) and NHL (30 patients). Blood samples along with bone marrow biopsies and aspirates will be collected for exploratory biomarker analysis to understand mechanisms of response to treatment or disease progression. This will include the analysis of tumour-specific and circulating biomarkers, such as tumour DNA, mRNA, proteins or metabolites. In NHL patients, analysis of CBP (and p300) mutations will be undertaken to allow retrospective correlation with tumour response and to determine if loss of function mutations in the genes for either proteins can be utilised as response predictive biomarkers in future studies. Disclosures Clegg: CellCentric Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:CellCentric Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ashby:CellCentric Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pegg:CellCentric Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. West:CellCentric Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Somervaille:Novartis: Consultancy. Knapper:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Tolero: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davies:ADCT Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys AG: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioInvent: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Karyopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5700-5700
Author(s):  
Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin ◽  
Maire Okoniewski ◽  
Osama Diab ◽  
Siddhartha Ganguly ◽  
Al-Ola Abdallah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) followed by maintenance is the standard of care for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). For patients that relapse, a second ASCT remains a viable option. However, the maintenance regimen to use for such patients remains an unanswered question, particularly in those with prior lenalidomide exposure. We retrospectively analyzed patients receiving two autologous transplants for a diagnosis of MM at our institution from 2008 to 2018 to determine maintenance strategies and outcomes upon completion of a second transplant. Methods: A total of 189 patients received two or more autologous transplants for MM at our institution from 2008 to 2018. Patients with planned tandem transplants, or those that proceeded directly to another transplant without interval progression were excluded. The remaining 135 patients were analyzed. Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. After first ASCT, 94 out of 135 patients (69.6 %) started maintenance therapy. The most commonly used maintenance regimen was lenalidomide in 63 patients, followed by bortezomib in 12 patients and thalidomide in 10 patients. Median time to initiation of maintenance from the date of transplant was 3.9 months. Overall median progression free survival (PFS) from transplant was 24.7 months with no significant difference between groups that received lenalidomide (median PFS: 21.2 months) or bortezomib (median PFS: 19.2 months, p:0.12). 10 (15.8%) patients discontinued lenalidomide due to toxicity, and 1 patient (8.3%) discontinued bortezomib due to toxicity. The median time from the onset of disease progression post first ASCT to time of second ASCT was 5.8 months. Strategies used post second ASCT includedconsolidation with triplet regimens followed by de-escalation (n=11) versus monotherapy (n=100). Table 2 highlights differing maintenance regimens used after the second ASCT. Median time from second ASCT to initiation of maintenance was 4.0 months. Median PFS post ASCT was 20.7 months. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the different regimens used (p=0.26), although there was a numerically higher discontinuation rate due to toxicity with older agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib compared with newer agents such as daratumumab and pomalidomide. There was no statistically significant difference in the cytogenetic risk profile (p=0.21) or stage at diagnosis (p=0.36) between the groups that received different types of maintenance agents. However, patients receiving daratumumab as maintenance were more likely to have received more lines of therapy (median 5 for Daratumumab vs 3 for Lenalidomide, p=0.0001), and more likely to have previous exposure to daratumumab prior to second ASCT (92% vs 0% for other agents p=0.0001). Patients receiving daratumumab, carfilzomib or triple therapy were more likely to have been refractory to both a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) (p=0.0001). Despite stratifying for use of newer novel drugs (FDA approval after 2010- pomalidomide, daratumumab, carfilzomib) vs older novel drugs (FDA approval before 2010- lenalidomide, bortezomib, thalidomide), there was no difference in PFS ( 21.2 months vs 20.4 months, p= 0.92), between these groups when used as part of a maintenance strategy. Conclusions: Our data show a variety of maintenance and consolidation regimens are used for patients with MM after their second ASCT. In this single-center, retrospective analysis, there was no clear superiority of a consolidative strategy using triplet over monotherapy, and no superiority of newer agents compared to older agents. This suggests that toxicity, prior therapies and their tolerance may be the more important patient-related factors for consideration when selecting an agent/agents. Randomized, prospective data will be important to ascertain the standard of care in this situation. Disclosures Ganguly: Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. McGuirk:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document