scholarly journals Lenalidomide and Risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Transformation Among Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Patients

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1912-1912
Author(s):  
Dana E Rollison ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Shalaka S Hampras ◽  
William Fulp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Case Control Analysis

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide is currently approved by the FDA for treatment of transfusion-dependent, lower risk, deletion 5q (del(5q)) MDS patients. In practice, lenalidomide is often used for treatment of non-del(5q) anemic, lower risk MDS patients as endorsed by national guidelines. The risk of AML transformation among non-del(5q) MDS patients treated with lenalidomide has not been well studied, nor among del(5q) MDS patients outside the context of original clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,248 MDS patients treated with or without lenalidomide at the Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) to investigate the association between lenalidomide and AML transformation. Methods: Patients treated for MDS at MCC in 2004-2012 were identified through MCC's data warehouse, including data from the Cancer Registry, electronic medical records and disease-specific databases. A total of 1,248 MDS patients, ages 18+ years, were identified, corresponding to International Classification of Diseases for Oncology Third Edition (ICD-O-3) codes 99801, 99803, 99833, 99843, 99853, 99863, 99873, 99891 and 99893. A total of 150 cases of AML transformation were verified by two hematologists confirming the MDS diagnosis and AML transformation. Incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AML transformation were estimated based on the Poisson distribution. Cox proportional hazards ratios (HR) and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate age-adjusted associations between lenalidomide treatment and AML transformation in the overall cohort, and stratified by lower (low and intermediate-1) risk versus higher (intermediate-2 and high) risk IPSS. To obtain additional details on lenalidomide treatment and potential confounders, medical chart abstraction was conducted for all AML cases and a sample of MDS patients from the baseline cohort who had not developed AML; these controls were matched to cases 1:1 on age at MDS diagnosis (<60 versus 60+ years), gender, follow-up time (+/- 6 months), date of diagnosis, (+/- 1 year), lower versus higher risk IPSS, and presence or absence of del (5q). Based on the abstracted data for the nested case-control sample, associations between lenalidomide and AML transformation were adjusted for cytogenetic risk, use of erythroid-stimulating agents (ESA), percent bone marrow myeloblasts, and MDS histology. Results: Overall, 1,248 MDS patients were followed for an average of 30 months, including patients treated with (n=210) or without (n=1,038) lenalidomide. AML transformation was observed among 16 patients treated with lenalidomide (2.4 per 100 person-years) and 134 patients treated without lenalidomide (5.5 per 100 person-years), corresponding to an age-adjusted HR of 0.44 (95% CI=0.26-0.74). Only two of the 150 MDS patients who transformed to AML had MDS del(5q). When stratified by IPSS, there was no increased risk of AML transformation associated with lenalidomide among patients with lower risk IPSS (HR=0.27, 95% CI=0.12-0.64) or patients with higher risk IPSS (HR=0.99, 95% CI=0.51-1.93). Based on the nested case-control analysis, 16.0% and 20.7% of MDS-AML cases and matched MDS controls who did not develop AML were treated with lenalidomide, respectively, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.16 (95% CI=0.52-2.56). Although a significant interaction was noted between lenalidomide and IPSS in relation to AML in the cohort analysis (Figure 1), lenalidomide was not associated with AML transformation among lower risk (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.10-1.94) or higher risk (OR=2.06, 95% CI=0.69-6.18) MDS patients after adjustment for prognostic factors in the case-control analysis. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort investigated outside the context of clinical trials for the rate of AML transformation among MDS patients treated with lenalidomide and the first to specifically examine non-del(5q) patients. Lenalidomide treatment was not associated with an increased risk of AML transformation among this large cohort of MDS patients. Figure 1: Incidence of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) among myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients treated with or without lenalidomide (Lena) and stratified by lower risk IPSS (low risk or intermediate-1 [0,1]) versus higher risk IPSS (intermediate-2 or high risk [2,3]), Moffitt Cancer Center, 2004-2012 Figure 1:. Incidence of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) among myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients treated with or without lenalidomide (Lena) and stratified by lower risk IPSS (low risk or intermediate-1 [0,1]) versus higher risk IPSS (intermediate-2 or high risk [2,3]), Moffitt Cancer Center, 2004-2012 Disclosures Rollison: Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide given as treatment for non-del(5q) MDS and/or multiple myeloma . Shain:L&M Healthcare/Onyx/Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Envision/Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lee:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Hampras:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Fulp:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Fisher:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Al Ali:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Padron:Icyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Lancet:Celgene, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Xu:Celgene, Inc.: Employment, stock options Other. Knight:Celgene, Inc: Employment, stock options Other. List:Celgene, Inc.: Consultancy. Dalton:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Komrokji:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Subsequent Primary Malignancies Among Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Treated with or without Lenalidomide

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 413-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana E Rollison ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Shalaka S Hampras ◽  
Kate Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nested Case Control ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide is approved by the FDA for treatment of transfusion-dependent, lower risk, deletion 5q (del(5q)) MDS patients and used widely in practice for non-del(5q) MDS patients with anemia. Recently, subsequent primary malignancies (SPM) have been reported to be associated with lenalidomide treatment of multiple myeloma, and it is unclear if this observation is disease-specific or more broadly related to a particular therapy. The SPM risk in lenalidomide-treated MDS patients has not been evaluated previously. To investigate whether lenalidomide is associated with an increased risk of SPM in MDS patients, we conducted a large, retrospective cohort study of 1,248 MDS patients treated with or without lenalidomide at the Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC). Methods: Patients treated for MDS at MCC in 2004-2012 were identified through MCC's enterprise wide data warehouse which combined clinical information from a variety of sources, including the Cancer Registry, electronic medical records and disease-specific databases. A total of 1,248 MDS patients, ages 18+ years, were identified, corresponding to International Classification of Diseases for Oncology Third Edition (ICD-O-3) codes 99801, 99803, 99833, 99843, 99853, 99863, 99873, 99891 and 99893. A total of 41 cases of SPM were verified by two hematologists for confirmation of both the baseline MDS diagnosis and the SPM diagnosis. SPM incidence rates were estimated based on the Poisson distribution. Cox proportional hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the age-adjusted association between lenalidomide treatment and SPM in the overall cohort, and stratified by lower versus higher risk IPSS. To obtain additional details on lenalidomide treatment and potential confounders, medical chart abstraction was conducted for all SPM cases in addition to a sample of MDS patients from the baseline cohort who had not developed SPM; these controls were matched to cases 1:1 on age at MDS diagnosis (<60 versus 60+ years), gender, follow-up time (+/- 6 months), date of diagnosis, (+/- 1 year), lower versus higher risk IPSS, and presence or absence of del (5q). Based on the medical record data abstracted for the nested case-control sample, associations between lenalidomide and SPM were estimated using odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI's calculated through conditional logistic regression, with adjustment for age at diagnosis, use of erythroid-stimulating agents (ESA), use of azacitidine and MDS histology. Results: Overall, 1,248 MDS patients were followed for an average of 30 months, including patients treated with (n=210) or without (n=1,038) lenalidomide. Incident SPM's were observed for 5 patients treated with lenalidomide (0.7 per 100 person-years) and 36 patients treated without lenalidomide (1.4 per 100 person-years), corresponding to an age-adjusted HR of 0.53 (95% CI=0.21-1.36) (Figure 1). Of the 41 SPM's observed, 33 were solid tumors comprised of 15 types, and 8 were hematological malignancies other than AML; no differences in SPM risk were observed by type of SPM. When stratified by IPSS, there was no increased risk of SPM observed for patients with low risk or intermediate-1 MDS (HR=0.36, 95% CI=0.11-1.20) nor for patients with intermediate-2 and high risk MDS (HR=2.30, 95% CI=0.45-11.65). Of the 41 SPM cases and 41 matched controls included in the nested case-control analysis, 12.2% (n=5) and 29.3% (n=12) were treated with lenalidomide, respectively, corresponding to an adjusted OR of 0.03 (95% CI=0.01-0.63). Similar associations were observed for lenalidomide whether given as part of first line treatment or subsequent therapy, and for lenalidomide given alone or in combination with other drugs. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first report to address rate of SPM among MDS patients treated with lenalidomide. SPM was not associated with lenalidomide treatment among a large cohort of patients with a broad spectrum of MDS diagnoses. Figure 1: Incidence of subsequent primary malignancies (SPM) among patients treated for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with or without lenalidomide, Moffitt Cancer Center 2004-2012 Figure 1:. Incidence of subsequent primary malignancies (SPM) among patients treated for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with or without lenalidomide, Moffitt Cancer Center 2004-2012 Disclosures Rollison: Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for the treatment of non-del(5q) MDS and/or multiple myeloma. Shain:Envision/Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; L&M Healthcare/Onyx/Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lee:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Hampras:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Fisher:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Al Ali:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Padron:Icyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Lancet:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Olesnyckyj:Celgene: Employment, stock options Other. Kenvin:Celgene: Employment, stock options Other. Knight:Celgene, Inc: Employment, stock options Other. Dalton:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. List:Celgene, Inc.: Consultancy. Komrokji:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Subsequent Primary Malignancies Among Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with or without Lenalidomide

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2129-2129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana E Rollison ◽  
Rami Komrokji ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Shalaka S Hampras ◽  
William Fulp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Case Control Analysis ◽  
Nested Case Control

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of subsequent primary malignancies (SPM) associated with lenalidomide treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) outside the context of maintenance therapy post-melphalan is unknown. Three clinical trials reported modest, statistically significant increased risks of SPM associated with lenalidomide treatment in MM patients (Palumbo et al, N Engl J Med, 2012; Attal et al, N Engl J Med, 2012; McCarthy et al, N Engl J Med, 2012). Although these randomized trials are well controlled for potential confounders, they represent a unique population of patients and a specific juxtaposition of lenalidomide use with melphalan; as such, their results are not necessarily generalizable to the broader MM patient population. To investigate whether lenalidomide is associated with an increased risk of SPM in MM patients within a clinical setting in the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,653 MM patients treated with or without lenalidomide at the Moffitt Cancer Center (“MCC”) in Tampa, FL. Methods: Patients treated for MM at MCC from 2004-2012 were identified through Moffitt's enterprise wide data warehouse combining clinical information from several sources, including the Cancer Registry, electronic medical records and disease-specific databases. Among 1,653 MM patients, ages 18 and older, 51 cases of SPM were verified by two hematologists for confirmation of MM and SPM diagnoses. Incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SPM were estimated using a Poisson distribution. Cox proportional hazards ratios (HR) and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the age-adjusted association between lenalidomide treatment and SPM in the overall cohort, and stratified by ISS. Additional details on lenalidomide treatment and potential confounders were obtained through medical chart abstraction for SPM cases and a subset of MM patients from the baseline cohort who had not developed SPM; these controls were matched to cases 2:1 on age at MM diagnosis (+/- 5 years), gender, follow-up time (+/- 6 months), and date of diagnosis (+/- 1 year). Associations between lenalidomide and SPM in the nested case-control analysis were estimated using odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs adjusted for age at MM diagnosis, bone marrow transplantation, creatinine levels and personal history of cancer. Results: Overall, 1,653 MM patients were followed for an average of 40 months, including patients treated with (n=846) or without (n=807) lenalidomide. Incident SPMs were observed for 15 patients treated with lenalidomide (0.55 per 100 person-years) and 36 patients treated without lenalidomide (1.27 per 100 person-years), corresponding to an HR of 0.44 (95% CI=0.24-0.80) (Figure 1). Of the 51 SPMs observed, 37 were solid tumors comprising 14 different types, including 9 and 28 in the lenalidomide and no lenalidomide groups, respectively (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.15-0.69). Of the 14 hematological SPMs observed, 8 were in the lenalidomide group versus 6 in the no lenalidomide group (HR=0.90, 95%CI = 0.31-2.63). Similar associations between lenalidomide and SPM were observed for MM patients with ISS = 1 (HR=0.26, 95% CI=0.06-1.21) and for MM patients with ISS = 2 or 3 (HR=0.20, 95% CI=0.02-1.62). Of the 51 SPM cases and 102 matched controls included in the nested case-control analysis, 33.3% and 74.5% were treated with lenalidomide, respectively (adjusted OR=0.03, 95% CI=0.002-0.34). Similar associations were observed for lenalidomide given as part of first line treatment versus subsequent treatment, and for lenalidomide given alone or in combination with other drugs. (8 cases and 46 controls received melphalan in addition to lenalidomide.) There was no association between lenalidomide and SPM among those treated for >9.1 months (OR=0.05, 95% CI=0.01-0.43), the median treatment duration among controls. Conclusion: Lenalidomide treatment was not associated with an increased risk of SPM among a large cohort of MM patients. It is important to note that in this clinical setting (in 2004-2012) the use of lenalidomide in combination with melphalan and in the maintenance setting was a rare event. This may be a critical factor in the contrast between the results of this study and in the increase in SPMs reported in randomized clinical trials. Figure 1: Incidence of SPM among patients treated for MM with or without lenalidomide, Moffitt Cancer Center, 2004-2012 Figure 1:. Incidence of SPM among patients treated for MM with or without lenalidomide, Moffitt Cancer Center, 2004-2012 Disclosures Rollison: Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide given as treatment for non-del(5q) MDS and/or multiple myeloma . Komrokji:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lee:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Hampras:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Fulp:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Fisher:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Baz:Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Olesnyckyj:Celgene: Employment, stock options Other. Kenvin:Celgene: Employment, stock options Other. Knight:Celgene, Inc: Employment, stock options Other. Dalton:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shain:L&M Healthcare/Onyx/Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Envision/Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Outcome Of Patients (pts) With Low and Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) After Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Failure

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Lianchun Xiao ◽  
Al Ali Najla ◽  
Asmita Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
High Risk Disease

Abstract Background HMA are standard of care in pts with high-risk MDS and commonly used in pts with lower risk. Pts with high-risk disease post HMA failure have a poor prognosis with a median survival of 4-6 months. The prognosis of pts with low and intermediate-1 risk MDS by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) after HMA failure is not known. Aims To assess outcome of pts with low and intermediate-1 risk disease post HMA failure that might benefit from specific strategies or investigational agents. Methods Data from 423 pts with low (n= 141, 33%) and intermediate-1 risk disease (n=282, 67%) by IPSS score treated with HMA at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; n=144) and Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC; n=279) between 2000 and 2011 were analyzed. Results Median age was 69 years. 294 (69%) pts had a diploid cytogenetic analysis. 63 (15%) pts had therapy-related MDS. 282 (67%) pts received azacitidine, 87 (21%) decitabine, and 54 (12%) both. Median number of cycles of HMA administered was 6 (range, 1-64) for a median duration of therapy of 7 months (range, 1- 74). Best response to HMA was complete response (CR) in 39 (9%) pts, partial response (PR) in 13 (3%), a bone marrow CR in 6 (1%), and hematologic improvement (HI) in 90 (21%) pts. Pts had discontinued HMA because of primary resistance in 198 (47%) pts, loss of response in 141 pts (33%), intolerance in 13 pts (3%) and other reasons in 71 pts (17%). At the time of HMA failure, 81 (19%) pts transformed into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of the 302 remaining pts evaluable by IPSS, 67 (22%) pts were of low-risk, 158 (53%) of intermediate-1 risk, 48 (16%) of intermediate-2 risk, and 29 (9%) of high-risk disease. By the revised IPSS (R-IPSS), the percentage of pts with low, very low, intermediate, high, and very high risk disease were 11%, 29%, 30%, 20%, and 10%, respectively. By the MDACC global prognostic scoring system (MDGPSS) 18%, 35%, 29%, and 18%, of the pts were of low-risk, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk disease, respectively. After a median follow-up of 16 months from HMA failure, 117 (28%) pts remained alive. The median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% CI: 12-18) with estimated 1- and 3-year OS rates of 55% and 27%, respectively. Both, the R-IPSS and the MDGPSS were predictive of survival post HMA failure (Table 1 ). Conclusion In the largest cohort of lower risk MDS pts treated with HMA, the outcome after HMA failure is poor. Treatment of those patients remains an unmet medical need. OS is a reasonable primary endpoint for clinical studies targeting this population. Disclosures: Lancet: Celgene: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. List:Celgene: Research Funding. Komrokji:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Clinical “MUTATOME” Of Myelodysplastic Syndrome; Comparison To Primary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 518-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Makishima ◽  
Thomas LaFramboise ◽  
Bartlomiej P Przychodzen ◽  
Kenichi Yoshida ◽  
Matthew Ruffalo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Clonal Architecture ◽  
Ras Family ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Chromosomal aberrations and somatic mutations constitute key elements of the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a clonal hematologic malignancy characterized by cytopenias, a dysplastic bone marrow and propensity to clonal evolution. Next generation sequencing (NGS) enables definition of somatic mutational patterns and clonal architecture as a discovery platform, and for clinical applications. We systematically applied NGS to 707 cases of MDS and MDS-related disorders. 205 cases (low-risk MDS: N=78, high-risk MDS: N=42, MDS/MPN: N=48 and sAML: N=37) were tested by whole exome sequencing (WES). For validation in an additional 502 patients (low-risk MDS: N=192, high-risk MDS: N=104, MDS/MPN: N=111 and sAML: N=95), targeted deep NGS was applied for 60 index genes which were most commonly affected in the cohort analyzed by WES. For NGS data analysis a statistical pipeline was developed to focus on: i) identification of the most relevant somatic mutations, and ii) minimization of false positive results. We studied serial samples from 21 exemplary informative patients. We also compared somatic mutational patterns to those seen in primary AML TCGA cohort (N=201). Given the size of the cohort, there was, for example, a 87% chance of seeing mutations at a frequency of 1% and a 98% of seeing those with a frequency of 2%. While focusing on the most common events, we observed 1117 somatic mutations in 199 genes. The 88 genes mutated mutated in >1% of cases with MDS carried 388 mutations in MDS+sAML (2.5/case), 128 in MDS/MPN (2.7/case) and 398 in pAML (2.0/case). The average number of mutations per case increased during progression (2.2 in lower-risk, 2.8 in higher-risk MDS, 3.4 in sAML). In MDS, the 30 most frequently affected genes were present at least once in 70% of patients. The 30 most frequently mutated genes in MDS/MPN were mutated in 82% of patients. Individual mutations were also sub-grouped according to their function. When we compared three MDS subcategories (lower-risk, higher-risk MDS and sAML) in a cross-sectional view, RTK family, RAS family, IDH family and cohesin family mutations were more frequently detected in the sAML group than in the MDS group. In contrast, the frequency of the DNMT family, TET2 and ASXL family gene mutations did not increase in frequency in the sAML cohort. In addition to better definition of mutational patterns of known genes, we have also defined new mutations, including in the RNA helicase family and the BRCC3pathway. Clonal architecture analysis indicates that mutations of TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, and U2AF1 most likely represent ancestral/originator events, while those of the IDH family, RTK family and cohesin family are typical secondary events. Establishment of mutational patterns may improve the precision of morphologically-based diagnosis. The comparison between MDS-related diseases (MDS+sAML) and pAML revealed a notably different mutational pattern suggestive of a distinct molecular derivation of these two disease groups. While RTK, IDH family and NPM1 mutations were more frequently observed in the pAML cohort, mutations of SF3B1 and SRSF2, were more common in MDS+sAML. With regard to the connections between individual mutation combinations, RTK mutations were strongly associated with DNMT, but not with RAS family mutations in the pAML cohort, while the mutual association between TET2 and PRC2 family, cohesin family and RUNX1were encountered in the MDS+sAML cohort. Individual mutations may have prognostic significance, including having an impact on survival, either within the entire cohort or within specific subgroups. In the combined MDS cohort, TP53 family mutations were associated with a poor prognosis (HR; 3.65, 95%CI; 1.90-7.01, P<.0001) by univariate analysis. Similar results were found for mutations in TCF4(HR; 7.98, 95%CI; 1.58-10.1, P<.0007). Such an individual approach does not allow for assessment of the impact of less common mutational events. In conclusion, our study continues to indicate the power of NGS in the molecular analysis of MDS. MDS and related disorders show a great deal of pathogenetic molecular overlap, consistent with their morphologic and clinical pictures, but also distinct molecular differences in mutational patterns. Some of the specific mutations are pathognomonic for specific subtypes while some may convey a prognostic rather than discriminatory value. Disclosures: Makishima: Scott Hamilton CARES grant: Research Funding; AA & MDS international foundation: Research Funding. Polprasert:MDS foundation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lymphoma in patients treated with anti-TNF: results of the 3-year prospective French RATIO registry

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 400-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Mariette ◽  
F Tubach ◽  
H Bagheri ◽  
M Bardet ◽  
J M Berthelot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Epstein Barr ◽  
Case Control Analysis

Objective:To describe cases of lymphoma associated with anti-TNF therapy, identify risk factors, estimate the incidence and compare the risks for different anti-TNF agents.Methods:A national prospective registry was designed (Research Axed on Tolerance of bIOtherapies; RATIO) to collect all cases of lymphoma in French patients receiving anti-TNF therapy from 2004 to 2006, whatever the indication. A case–control analysis was conducted including two controls treated with anti-TNF per case and an incidence study of lymphoma with the French population was used as the reference.Results:38 cases of lymphoma, 31 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (26 B cell and five T cell), five Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and two Hodgkin’s-like lymphoma were collected. Epstein–Barr virus was detected in both of two Hodgkin’s-like lymphoma, three of five HL and one NHL. Patients receiving adalimumab or infliximab had a higher risk than those treated with etanercept: standardised incidence ratio (SIR) 4.1 (2.3–7.1) and 3.6 (2.3–5.6) versus 0.9 (0.4–1.8). The exposure to adalimumab or infliximab versus etanercept was an independent risk factor for lymphoma in the case–control study: odds ratio 4.7 (1.3–17.7) and 4.1 (1.4–12.5), respectively. The sex and age-adjusted incidence rate of lymphoma was 42.1 per 100 000 patient-years. The SIR was 2.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.2).Conclusion:The two to threefold increased risk of lymphoma in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy is similar to that expected for such patients with severe inflammatory diseases. Some lymphomas associated with immunosuppression may occur, and the risk of lymphoma is higher with monoclonal-antibody therapy than with soluble-receptor therapy.

scholarly journals Evidence of nickel and other trace elements and their relationship to clinical findings in acute Mesoamerican Nephropathy: A case-control analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0240988
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. B. Fischer ◽  
Jason M. Unrine ◽  
Chandan Vangala ◽  
Wayne T. Sanderson ◽  
Sreedhar Mandayam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trace Elements ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Inductively Coupled Plasma ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Mesoamerican Nephropathy ◽  
Case Control Analysis

Background Although there are several hypothesized etiologies of Mesoamerican Nephropathy (MeN), evidence has not yet pointed to the underlying cause. Exposure to various trace elements can cause the clinical features observed in MeN. Methods and findings We measured 15 trace elements, including heavy metals, in renal case-patients (n = 18) and healthy controls (n = 36) in a MeN high-risk region of Nicaragua. Toenails clippings from study participants were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. A case-control analysis was performed, and concentrations were also analyzed over participant characteristics and clinical parameters. Nickel (Ni) concentrations were significantly higher in toenails from cases (1.554 mg/kg [0.176–42.647]) than controls (0.208 mg/kg [0.055–51.235]; p<0.001). Ni concentrations correlated positively with serum creatinine levels (p = 0.001) and negatively with eGFR (p = 0.001). Greater Ni exposure was also associated with higher leukocyte (p = 0.001) and neutrophil (p = 0.003) counts, fewer lymphocytes (p = 0.003), and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.004) and hematocrit (p = 0.011). Conclusions Low-dose, chronic environmental exposure to Ni is a possible health risk in this setting. Ni intoxication and resulting systemic and renal effects could explain the clinical signs observed during early MeN. This study provides compelling evidence for a role of Ni in the acute renal impairment observed in this MeN high-risk population. Additional work to assess exposure levels in a larger and heterogeneous population, identify environmental sources of Ni and exposure pathways, and evaluate the link between Ni and MeN pathogenesis are urgently needed.

scholarly journals Bacillus Cereus: A Leukemia-Specific, Neuroinvasive Pathogen?

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4145-4145
Author(s):  
Chanu Rhee ◽  
Veronica Manzo ◽  
Terrance Shea ◽  
Christopher Desjardins ◽  
Geraldine Van der Auwera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Bacillus Cereus ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Draft Genome ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Case Control Analysis

Abstract Background Bacillus cereus has been associated with central nervous system (CNS) infections in immunocompromised patients.1 We report 5 cases of neuroinvasive B.cereus infections (4 fatal) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) in Boston from May 2013 to February 2014. Methods Clinical Investigation: Cases were defined as patients with positive blood or CNS cultures for B.cereus and/or positive PCR tests from CNS specimens and radiological evidence of acute CNS disease >48 hours after admission. Infection control practices were observed. A case-control analysis of medications and exposures was conducted; odds ratios and p-values were calculated via Fisher’s exact test. Genomic Analysis: Genomic DNA was extracted from patient-derived and environmental B. cereus isolates. Sequencing libraries were prepared and paired-end whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed. Sequencing reads were computationally assembled using several existing tools (SPAdes, AllPaths-LG, VELVET, and Newbler). Draft genome annotation was performed using RAST and Prodigal. All single copy core genes were aligned using MUSCLE and a phylogenetic tree was generated using FastTree and RAxML. Results Clinical Investigation: All 5 cases were AML patients who received chemotherapy. All had neutropenic fevers early in their course that resolved with empiric antibiotics. Fever recurred > 1 week into hospitalization (median onset 17 days, range 9-20) with headaches, neurological changes, and abnormal CNS imaging. Three had documented B. cereus bacteremia with bacilli identified on CNS pathological stains; two had positive CNS cultures. Four patients expired. Autopsies were notable for intestinal ulcers with Gram-positive bacilli in 2 patients. No infection control breaches were observed. Of 43 environmental samples, 4 tested positive for B.cereus, including a kitchen cart where bananas were stored, the shelf of a blanket warmer, and an air sample near a construction site. On case-control analysis, no medications were associated with cases. The only significant food exposures were bananas (OR 9.3, p=0.04) and cranberry juice (OR 9.6, p=0.04). Genomic Analysis: WGS data was obtained for all B. cereus isolates from BWH (n=4) and swabs of environmental screening efforts from BWH (n=4). Two patient isolates (7299 and 6254) were taken forward for pilot analysis. A comparison of various computational assembly tools demonstrated that the SPAdes assembler exhibited superior performance. SPAdes was thus used for draft genome assembly for the remaining isolates. Phylogenetic analysis of isolates 7299 and 6254 revealed that the organisms were genetically distinct from one another (Fig. 1). Genomic analysis and multilocus sequence typing (performed by WGS and independently by PCR amplification/Sanger sequencing) confirmed that all strains were genetically distinct from one another, and suggested that the environmental strains were relatively divergent from the pathogenic strains studied. Conclusions Neuroinvasive B.cereus infection should be suspected in febrile AML patients with acute neurological symptoms, even those with negative blood cultures. The clinical investigation suggests the outbreak may have been attributable to gastrointestinal inoculation, possibly secondary to bananas. Of note, the B. cereus strain cultured from the suspected banana source was not identical to the pathogenic strains. Multiple changes in practice were instituted as a consequence of this outbreak including enhanced environmental cleanings, temporary modification of empiric antibiotic recommendations for recurrent neutropenic fever (vancomycin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin) and the placement of all AML patients on diets that excluded fresh fruits, vegetables, and rice. Six months have elapsed since the last case. WGS demonstrated that the case series was not the result of a single, hyper-virulent B. cereus organism. Rather, the infections appear to have been attributable to distinct B. cereus strains that fall into two distinct genotypic clusters. Ongoing comparative microbial genomic and biological efforts are underway and have identified candidate bacterial and host factors that may induce heightened virulence in this patient population. 1. Inoue et al. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2010;51(5):860-9. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Infection following deep brain stimulator implantation performed in the conventional versus magnetic resonance imaging–equipped operating room

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Gorgulho ◽  
Catherine Juillard ◽  
Daniel Z. Uslan ◽  
Katayoun Tajik ◽  
Poorang Aurasteh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulator ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Case Control Analysis ◽  
Deep Brain

Object Risk factors for deep brain stimulator (DBS) infection are poorly defined. Because DBS implants are not frequently performed in the MR imaging–equipped operating room (OR), no specific data about infection of DBS implants performed in the MR imaging environment are available in the literature. In this study the authors focus on the incidence of infection in patients undergoing surgery in the conventional versus MR imaging–equipped OR. Methods To identify cases of DBS-associated infection, the authors performed a retrospective cohort study with nested case-control analysis of all patients undergoing DBS implantation at the University of California Los Angeles Medical Center. Cases of DBS infection were identified using standardized clinical and microbiological criteria. Results Between January 1998 and September 2003, 228 DBSs were implanted. Forty-seven operations (20.6%) were performed in the conventional OR and 181 (79.4%) in the MR imaging–equipped OR. There was definite infection in 13 cases (5.7%) and possible infection in 7 cases (3%), for an overall infection rate of 8.7% (20 of 228 cases). There was no significant difference in infection rates in the conventional (7 [14.89%] of 47) versus MR imaging–equipped OR (13 [7.18%] of 181) (p = 0.7). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 62% of cases. Twelve of 13 confirmed cases underwent complete hardware removal. On case-control analysis, younger age (≤ 58.5 years) was a significant predictor of DBS infection (odds ratio 3.4, p = 0.027) Conclusions Infection is a serious complication of DBS implantation and commonly requires device removal for cure. The authors found that DBS implantation can be safely performed in MR imaging–equipped suites, possibly allowing improved lead placement. Young age was associated with an increased risk of DBS infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document