Ublituximab, a Novel Glycoengineered Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (mAb), in Combination with TGR-1202, a Next Generation Once Daily PI3kδ Inhibitor, Demonstrates Activity in Heavily Pre-Treated and High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Lunning ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Richter's Transformation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
11Q Deletion

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel chimeric mAb targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen, glycoengineered to enhance affinity to FcγRIIIa receptors, thereby demonstrating significantly greater ADCC than rituximab. UTX monotherapy in patients (pts) with rituximab relapsed/refractory NHL and CLL has reported a 43% ORR (ASCO 2014). TGR-1202 is a next generation, once daily, oral PI3Kδ inhibitor which notably lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, and is active in pts with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies (EHA 2014). UTX and TGR-1202 have shown synergistic activity in-vitroin various lymphoid cell lines (Lugano 2013). This Phase 1 trial evaluates safety and efficacy of the combination of a glycoengineered anti-CD20 (UTX) and a PI3Kδ inhibitor (TGR-1202) in pts with heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory CLL and NHL. Methods: Eligible pts have relapsed/refractory CLL or NHL with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. A 3+3 design evaluates cohorts of CLL and NHL pts independently with UTX dosed on Days 1, 8, 15 of Cycles 1 & 2 followed by maintenance therapy. UTX starts at 600 mg in Cohort 1 and increases to 900 mg for pts with CLL and is fixed at 900 mg for pts with NHL. TGR-1202 starts at 800 mg QD in Cohort 1 and is increased in subsequent cohorts. An amendment in July 2014 was introduced to include an improved micronized formulation of TGR-1202, starting at 400 mg once daily and increasing in subsequent cohorts. There are no limits on prior therapy, and patients with Richter’s Transformation or who are refractory to prior PI3Kδ inhibitors or BTK inhibitors are eligible. Primary endpoints: Safety and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints: Efficacy (ORR, CR rate). Results: As of August 2014, 21 pts have been enrolled: 8 CLL/SLL, 7 DLBCL, 5 Follicular Lymphoma, and 1 patient with Richter’s Transformation. Median age is 64 years (range 35-82); 12 male/9 female. Median prior Tx = 3 (range 1-9); median ECOG PS = 1. All pts are evaluable for safety. Adverse events have been manageable with no safety concerns noted. Day 1 infusion related reactions (IRR) were the most common treatment related adverse event (48%), with all but one event Grade 1 or 2 in severity, followed by neutropenia (38%), diarrhea (29%), and nausea (29%). Notably, no events of TGR-1202 related hepatotoxicity have been reported to date. All IRR and neutropenia events have been manageable with dose delays. One neutropenia related dose delay in a CLL patient at UTX 600 mg + TGR 800 mg met the criteria for a DLT, necessitating enrollment of additional pts into this cohort. No other DLTs have been reported, including at higher dose levels. Fifteen pts were evaluable for efficacy with 6 pts too early for response assessment. Among evaluable pts, 80% displayed a reduction in tumor burden at first efficacy assessment, despite pts exhibiting a number of high-risk characteristics, including 3/5 CLL pts having 17p/11q deletion and a median of 6 prior lines of therapy amongst pts with FL. Objective responses are summarized below: Table TypePts (n)PRn (%)ORRn (%)PD(n)% pts ≥ SD for 12 wksMedian Prior Rx CLL/SLL54 (80%)4 (80%)-5 (100%)2 (1 – 3) Richter’s1---1 (100%)1 FL4---4 (100%)6 (3 – 8) DLBCL52 (40%)2 (40%)14 (80%)3 (1 – 6) Total156 (40%)6 (40%)114 (93%)3 (1 – 8) Amongst pts with CLL, 2/2 pts with normal cytogenetics achieved a PR including a patient with prior treatment with a BTK inhibitor, while 2/3 pts with presence of 17p/11q deletion achieved a PR, with the remaining patient having SD with a 44% nodal reduction at first assessment. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggests the combination of UTX + TGR-1202 is well tolerated with early signs of clinical activity in heavily pre-treated and high-risk patient subsets. Enrollment is ongoing with at least 30 patients anticipated. Disclosures Lunning: Onyx: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Pauli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vakkalanka:Rhizen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Viswanadha:Incozen: Employment. O'Brien:Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Ublituximab + TGR-1202 Demonstrates Activity and a Favorable Safety Profile in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell NHL and High-Risk CLL: Phase I Results

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1538-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Lunning ◽  
Julie Vose ◽  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Loretta Nastoupil ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Favorable Safety ◽  
Higher Doses

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel anti-CD20 mAb that has been glycoengineered for enhanced ADCC. TGR-1202 is a novel once daily oral PI3Kδ inhibitor with clinical activity in B-cell lymphoma and a notably differentiated tolerability profile compared to similar agents. The combination of UTX + TGR-1202 showed strong synergistic activity in-vitro (Lugano 2013). Herein we report the results from the Phase 1 (dose-escalation) and updated results from the Phase Ib (dose-expansion) evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of UTX + TGR-1202 in patients (pts) with heavily pre-treated rel/ref NHL and CLL. Methods: A 3+3 design was utilized with rel/ref NHL and CLL pts accruing independently and no limit on the number or type of prior therapies. Patients refractory to prior PI3K or BTK inhibitors were eligible. UTX was administered D1, 8, 15 of Cyc 1 & 2, followed by D1 of Cyc 4, 6, 9 & 12. TGR-1202 was administered orally once-daily starting on D1 of Cyc 1. Primary endpoints: Safety and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints: Efficacy (ORR, CR rate). Results: 56 patients have been enrolled to date and are evaluable for safety: 16 CLL/SLL, 16 FL, 16 DLBCL, 5 MZL, 2 MCL and 1 Richter's transformation. Med age 64 yo (range 29-86); 37 M/19 F; median # prior treatment regimens = 3 (range 1-9). Day 1 infusion reactions (2% G 3/4), neutropenia (23% G 3/4), diarrhea (2% G 3/4), and nausea (0% G 3/4) were the most commonly reported adverse events considered at least possibly related to either study drug. One patient (CLL cohort 1) with baseline Gr 3 neutropenia at study entry worsened to Gr 4 resulting in a dose delay which necessitated enrollment of an additional 3 pts at that dose level. Dose escalation continued into all planned subsequent NHL and CLL cohorts (up to 1200 mg). No MTD was observed in the Phase I portion and subtype specific expansion cohorts (Phase Ib) with 800 and 1200 mg dose of micronized TGR-1202 followed. Activity was observed at all dose levels; however a possible dose-response relationship was observed with TGR-1202 at higher doses compared to the lower doses. Of the 37 evaluable pts treated at the higher doses of TGR-1202 (1200 mg original formulation or > 600 mg micronized), overall response was as follows: CLL/SLL (5/7); FL/MZL (10/15); DLBCL (5/12); MCL (0/2) and Richter's (1/1). No CLL pts progressed at the first efficacy assessment, despite 4/5 having high-risk cytogenetics. Two CLL pts with SD include a 17p del, ibrutinib refractory patient who eventually progressed on treatment and the other remains on study awaiting future assessments. Of interest, 7 of the DLBCL pts were GCB subtype of which 71% were rituximab refractory, with 3/7 achieving an objective response, 2 remaining in stable disease (4+ and 5+ mos each), and 2 having progressed to date (avg time on study 7 mos, range 2 - 16+ mos). Conclusions: The combination of UTX + TGR-1202 is active and well tolerated in pts with both indolent and aggressive rel/ref NHL and CLL. The Phase I portion is complete and enrollment remains open in expansion cohorts for CLL, FL/MZL and DLBCL pts evaluating TGR-1202 micronized doses at 800 to 1200 mg in combination with UTX. Given the favorable safety profile and clinical activity observed, Phase 3 programs are planned with UTX + TGR-1202. Disclosures Lunning: BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Vose:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nastoupil:Genentech: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Siddiqi:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics/Jannsen: Speakers Bureau; Kite pharma: Other: attended advisory board meeting. Flowers:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Celegene: Other: Unpaid consultant, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celegene: Other: Unpaid consultant, Research Funding. Cutter:Clearview Cancer Center: Employment. Pauli:Clearview Cancer Institute: Employment; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial of TGR-1202, a Next Generation Once-Daily PI3Kδ Inhibitor, in Combination with Brentuximab Vedotin, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkins Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4146-4146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽  
Carolyn M. Mulroney ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Peter Sportelli ◽  
Hari P. Miskin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Introduction: TGR-1202 is a once daily, oral PI3Kδ inhibitor that has demonstrated activity in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies, with a favorable safety and tolerability profile compared to other PI3Kδ inhibitors (Burris, ASCO 2016). Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a CD30 specific antibody-drug conjugate, which is FDA approved for the treatment of Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) and Systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (sALCL). BV has demonstrated impressive response rates in pts with rel/ref disease, however the duration of response is short in pts not achieving a complete response (median PFS of ~6 months for non-CR pts; Gopal et al, Blood 2015). Marked synergy has been demonstrated pre-clinically with TGR + BV, with the combination demonstrating a 3-fold increase in cell death in-vitro and a 55% increase in tumor growth inhibition over either TGR or BV alone in an in-vivo xenograft model of HL (Locatelli et al, ASH 2014). As the combination of TGR + BV displays strong synergy pre-clinically and incorporates non-overlapping mechanisms of activity, a Phase 1 trial evaluating the combination of TGR + BV in pts with rel/ref HL was undertaken. Methods: Eligible pts have relapsed or refractory HL, have received prior ASCT or at least 2 prior regimens, and have an ECOG PS < 3. Prior BV exposure is allowed. Two dose cohorts for TGR are evaluated (400 and 600 mg) dosed once daily with a fixed dose of BV 1.8 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle (Cycle = 21 days) until off study. Safety is the primary endpoint evaluated by CTCAE v. 4.0. Efficacy (ORR and duration of response) is a secondary endpoint with responses determined according to response criteria of the International Working Group (Cheson, JCO 2007). Results: Fourteen pts have been enrolled. Median age is 34 (range 21 - 81); 9 Male/5 Female; Median ECOG PS = 1; with a median of 3 prior therapies (range 2 - 6). Seven pts had prior ASCT. Six pts had previously received BV, and all 6 were refractory to prior BV therapy. All pts are evaluable for safety. The most common AEs regardless of causality were nausea (71%; 0% Gr. 3/4), diarrhea (57%; 7% Gr. 3/4), neutropenia (50%; 43% Gr. 3/4), and rash (43%; 7% Gr. 3/4), followed by cough, dyspnea, and vomiting (36% each, all grades). Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 4 pts (29%), and were all Grade 1/2. Eleven pts were evaluable for efficacy, with 3 discontinuing prior to first efficacy assessment (1 withdrew consent, and 2 due to AEs). The ORR was 64% (7/11), with 45% (5/11) achieving a complete response with a median TTR of 8 weeks. Notably, 50% (3/6) of BV refractory patients responded to TGR-1202 + BV combination therapy (2 CRs, 1 PR). Three responding patients proceeded to stem cell transplant. Of the remaining 4 patients achieving a response, 2 patients remain in CR, and 2 have progressed (at 13 and 16.5 mos respectively). Conclusions: The combination of TGR-1202 + brentuximab vedotin exhibits an acceptable tolerability profile and is clinically active. Responses were observed in patients with advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma, including responses in 50% of patients previously refractory to brentuximab vedotin. Further studies evaluating this combination are warranted. Disclosures Sportelli: TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals A Phase 2a Study of the LSD1 Inhibitor Img-7289 (bomedemstat) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 556-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Pettit ◽  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Justin M. Watts ◽  
Maciej Tartaczuch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Equity Ownership

Ruxolitinib (Jakafi®) is the one approved therapy for myelofibrosis (MF) based on reduction of splenomegaly and symptoms but JAK inhibition has not proven to significantly modify disease progression. There remains the need for novel therapies with distinct modes of action that can improve the patient experience of MF and impact progression. Lysine-specific demethylase, LSD1, is an epigenetic enzyme critical for self-renewal of malignant myeloid cells and differentiation of myeloid progenitors. LSD1 bound to GFI1b permits maturation of progenitors to megakaryocytes and enables their normal function. IMG-7289 (bomedemstat) is an orally available LSD1 inhibitor. In mouse models of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), IMG-7289 reduced elevated peripheral cell counts, spleen size, inflammatory cytokines, mutant allele frequencies, and marrow fibrosis (Jutzi et al. 2018) supporting its clinical development. IMG-7289-CTP-102 is an ongoing, multi-center, open-label study that recently transitioned from a Phase 1/2a dose-range finding study to a Phase 2b study of IMG-7289 administered orally once-daily in adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF resistant to or intolerant of ruxolitinib. The key objectives are safety, PD, changes in spleen volume (MRI/CT) and total symptoms scores (TSS) using the MPN-SAF instrument. Inclusion criteria included a platelet count ≥100K/μL. Bone marrow (BM) biopsies and imaging studies (both centrally-read) were conducted at baseline and during washout (post-Day 84). The MPN-SAF was self-administered weekly. Phase 1/2a patients were treated for 84 days followed by a washout of up to 28 days. Patients demonstrating clinical benefit could resume treatment for additional 12 week cycles. Dosing was individually tailored using platelet count as a biomarker of effective thrombopoiesis. Patients were started at a presumed sub-therapeutic dose of 0.25 mg/kg/d and up-titrated weekly until the platelet count rested between 50 and 100K/μL. This preliminary analysis includes 20 patients; 18 enrolled in the Phase 1/2a study, 2 in the Phase 2b portion. 50% had PMF, 35% Post-ET-MF, 15% Post-PV-MF. The median age was 65 (48-89) with 70% males. The median baseline platelet count was 197 k/μL (102-1309k/μL). 12 patients (56%) were transfusion-dependent at baseline. Sixty percent were IPSS-classified as high risk, the remainder, intermediate risk-2. 71% had more than 1 mutation of the 261 AML/MPN genes sequenced of which 63% were high molecular risk (ASXL1, U2AF1, SRSF2) mutations; 31% had abnormal karyotypes. Sixteen patients completed the first 12 weeks; 4 patients withdrew, one due to fatigue (Day 33), one for progressive disease (Day 39), one due to physician decision (Day 76), one for an unrelated SAE of cellulitis (Day 83). All patients were up-titrated from the starting dose 0.25 mg/kg to an average daily dose of 0.89 mg/kg ± 0.20 mg/kg, the dose needed to achieve the target platelet count range; 17 achieved the target platelet range in a mean time of 45 days. Of patients evaluable for response after cycle 1 in Phase1/2a (N=14), 50% had a reduction in spleen volume from baseline (median SVR: -14%; -2% to -30%). Further, 79% (N=11) recorded a reduction in TSS (mean change -28%; -13% to -69%); for 21% of patients (N=3), the change was &gt;-50%. Improved BM fibrosis scores at Day 84 were observed in 2/13 patients. Two patients had improvement in transfusion requirements. Plasma IL-8 levels were significantly elevated in 6/14 patients at baseline and dropped in a dose-dependent manner over 21 days in 5/6 patients. The mean duration of treatment is 166 days (14-539) at the census point in this ongoing study. Nineteen patients (95%) reported 358 AEs of which 22 were SAEs. Of the SAEs, 2 were deemed by investigators as possibly related: painful splenomegaly and heart failure. There have been no safety signals, DLTs, progression to AML, or deaths. This is the first clinical study of an LSD1 inhibitor in patients with MPNs. Once-daily IMG-7289 was well-tolerated in a heterogeneous population of patients with advanced MF and limited therapeutic options. Despite under-dosing and slow dose escalation, IMG-7289 improved symptom burdens in most patients and modestly reduced spleen volumes in a subset of patients. The Phase 2b 24-week expansion study with more aggressive dosing aimed at preserving safety and enhancing efficacy is open for enrollment in the US, UK and EU. Figure Disclosures Pettit: Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Gerds:Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Yacoub:Hylapharm: Equity Ownership; Agios: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ardelyx: Equity Ownership; Cara: Equity Ownership; Dynavax: Equity Ownership. Watts:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Shortt:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astex: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Natsoulis:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Jones:Imago BioSciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Talpaz:Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding. Peppe:Imago BioSciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rienhoff:Imago Biosciences: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

In Vitro Activity of the Type II Anti-CD20 Antibody GA101 in Refractory, Genetic High-Risk CLL.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2379-2379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Zenz ◽  
Matthias Volden ◽  
Theresa Mast ◽  
Antonio Sarno ◽  
Dirk Winkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Cell Depletion ◽  
B Cell Depletion ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 2379 Poster Board II-356 Introduction: Anti-CD20 (i.e. rituximab) based immuno-chemotherapies are now considered standard of care in CLL. However, addition of rituximab does not appear to decisively alter the dismal clinical outcome for 17p- / TP53 mutated CLL. Relatively little is known about activity of different anti-CD20 antibodies in genetic subgroups of CLL. Methods: In an effort to assess the activity of the next generation mAb GA101 in vitro, we studied B cell depletion / apoptosis in a set of CLL patients. CLL samples were genetically characterized with respect to genetics (genomic aberrations, TP53 mutation, IGHV mutation status), as well as clinical course and immunophenotype. To study the effect on CLL cells, we assessed GA101, Rituximab and Alemtuzumab by in vitro treatment after ficoll separation with FACS (7-AAD) for viability. In addition, in order to maintain ADCC and to mirror the in vivo situation, we studied the effect of GA101 in a whole blood culture (n=10). Results: With increasing concentrations (0.01-100mg/ml) of GA101 we observed significant cell death as measured by a B cell depletion assay (whole blood) after GA101 exposure (n=10). After 3 hours the maximum effect was observed at a concentration of 10mg/ml with a reduction of CLL cells to 43% of untreated cells. The results after 8h were similar, again showing the profound effect in GA101 treated samples (mean B-cell depletion to 34.6% remaining cells). Interestingly, further increasing the dose to 100mg/ml did not increase the B-cell depletion by the antibody, but appeared to decrease the ability to deplete CLL cells (Fig. 1). In contrast treatment with control antibodies (isotype control, rituximab, alemtuzumab) did not lead to similar B-cell depletion (101%, 69%, and 73% of control cells at 3h). We were particularly interested in any potential effect in cases with TP53 mutation. While the sample number is still low (TP53 mutation / 17p deletion n=3), currently we have no indication of differential response in different genetic subgroups. Conclusion: Compared to the currently most widely used mAb in CLL (Rituximab), GA101 appears more potent at equivalent concentration in depleting CLL cells. Further in vitro studies are currently ongoing to assess this antibody in particular in genetic high-risk, refractory CLL. Disclosures: Zenz: Roche: Honoraria. Klein:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Umana:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Döhner:Roche: Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Roche, Bayer Schering Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibitors Reverse the Stromal Adhesion Phenotype of Ikaros-Mutant B-ALL, Induce Apopotosis, and Synergize with ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A New Paradigm for Pathogenesis and Therapy of High-Risk B-ALL

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 285-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ila Joshi ◽  
Nilamani Jena ◽  
Toshimi Yoshida ◽  
Leto Paraskevopoulou ◽  
Zhihong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
B Lymphoid ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

Abstract B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is a malignancy of precursor B-lymphocytes affecting both children and adults. Deletions and dominant-negative mutations in IKZF1, the gene encoding the Ikaros transcription factor, are found in ~85% of Ph+ B-ALL and in some cases of Ph– B-ALL, and are associated with poor prognosis. Genomic studies of high-risk Ph– or “Ph-like” B-ALLs have revealed frequent mutation and activation of TK genes and signaling pathways. While ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as dasatinib and imatinib have been added to chemotherapy regimens for Ph+ B-ALL, over half of these patients will still relapse, which correlates with residual disease burden in the bone marrow (BM) following induction therapy. Hence, new therapeutic strategies are needed for patients with Ikaros-mutant, high-risk Ph+ and Ph– B-ALL. Using mice with a conditional Ikzf1 mutation (Ike5fl) where the recombined allele is similar to the dominant-negative Ik6 mutant found in human B-ALL, we demonstrated recently that Ikaros DNA-binding function is required in the B-lymphoid lineage for transition from the large to small pre-B cell stage of differentiation, and that arrest at this stage of development can give rise to B-ALL (Joshi et al., Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:294). The survival and proliferation of Ikaros mutant pre-B cells is dependent on increased integrin-mediated stromal adhesion and activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). FAK is a non-receptor TK, downstream of integrins and growth factor receptors, which plays important roles in cancer stem cell biology, the tumor microenvironment and tumorigenesis. VS-4718 and VS-6063 (defactinib) are potent, orally bioavailable FAK inhibitors that inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in preclinical models, and are currently under evaluation in clinical trials in patients with various solid tumors. VS-6063 has demonstrated tolerability and preliminary signs of clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with paclitaxel in phase I trials (ASCO, 2014). Here, we show that BCR-ABL1 cooperates with Ikzf1 mutation to accelerate B-leukemogenesis in mice. BCR-ABL1+ Ikaros-mutant B-ALLs exhibit stroma-mediated resistance to ABL1 TKIs, while the FAK inhibitors VS-4718 and VS-6063 are effective in blocking stromal adhesion and inducing apoptosis in both mouse and human Ikaros-mutant B-ALL samples. To test whether dysregulation of TK signaling cooperates with Ikzf1 mutation in the pathogenesis of high-risk B-ALL, we isolated BM B-lymphoid progenitor cells from wild-type (WT), IkE5fl/+ CD2-Cre, and IkE5fl/fl CD2-Cre donors, transduced them with BCR-ABL1 retrovirus and transplanted the cells into recipient mice. We observed a dramatic acceleration of precursor B-lymphoid leukemia induced by BCR-ABL1 in IkE5Δ/+ and particularly in IkE5Δ/Δ donor cells that correlated with a striking (~30-fold) increase in the frequency of engrafting leukemia-initiating or leukemic stem cells (LSCs). Relative to Ikzf1 WT BCR-ABL1+ leukemic cells, Ikzf1-mutant BCR-ABL1+ blasts showed significant resistance to imatinib and dasatinib that was dependent on the presence of OP9 stroma. The effect of FAK inhibition, using the FAK inhibitors VS-4718, VS-6062, and VS-6063 (Verastem), was first tested on murine B-ALL cells (genotypes Ikzf1 mutant, Ikzf1 mutant BCR-ABL1+, and Ikzf1 WT BCR-ABL1+) grown on OP9 stroma. FAK inhibitor treatment abolished stromal adhesion of Ikzf1-mutant B-ALL and induced apoptosis in non-adherent cells, but had little effect on Ikzf1 WT B-ALL cells. VS-4718 and VS-6063 were each synergistic with dasatinib in reducing the viability of Ikzf1-mutant BCR-ABL1+ B-ALL cells cultured on OP9 stroma. For primary human B-ALL samples grown on OP9 stroma, IKZF1-mutant cells were also more sensitive to FAK inhibitor treatment than WT IKZF1 WT B-ALL, with or without BCR-ABL1 expression. Collectively, these observations suggest a new model to explain the pathogenesis of high-risk B-ALL and its resistance to therapy. B-ALLs with IKZF1 mutations may be resistant to TKIs and to chemotherapy by virtue of their stromal adhesion phenotype, resulting in failure to eliminate BM LSCs. Inhibition of FAK signaling in Ph+ or Ph­–IKZF1-mutant B-ALL may reverse the stromal-mediated resistance to ABL1 TKIs and/or chemotherapy. Therefore, FAK inhibitors warrant further investigation for the treatment of high-risk IKZF1-mutant B-ALL patients. Disclosures Joshi: Verastem: Research Funding. Yoshida:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding. Paraskevopoulou:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding. Zhang:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding. Krause:Glycomimetics. Inc.: Research Funding. Shapiro:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pachter:Verastem Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Georgopoulos:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding.

Effect of the Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inducers, Rifampicin and Dexamethasone, on the Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Safety Profile of Bortezomib In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983
Author(s):  
Andrzej Hellmann ◽  
Simon A. Rule ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Ofer Shpilberg ◽  
Huaibao Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Proteasome Inhibition ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Cyp3a4 Inducer ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Abstract 3983 Background: Bortezomib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 2C19 enzymes. Effects of co-administration of rifampicin (a potent CYP3A4 inducer) and dexamethasone (weak CYP3A4 inducer) on the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and safety profiles of bortezomib were evaluated. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in this open-label, 2-stage, parallel-group study. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 3 cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 q3wk either alone or in combination with rifampicin 600 mg once-daily on d 4 to 10 of cycle 3 only. Stage 2 patients received bortezomib at same dose and schedule in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg once-daily on d 1 to 4 and d 9 to 12 of cycle 3 only. Patients could continue with bortezomib monotherapy for up to 10 cycles in case of clinical benefit. For PK/PD, blood samples were collected before and through 72 hours following bortezomib administration on d 11 of cycles 2 and 3. PK was the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints included PD (proteasome inhibition) and safety. Results: 61 patients were enrolled (39 MM, 22 NHL) in the study. 13 were treated with bortezomib + rifampicin, 18 with bortezomib + dexamethasone, and 30 with bortezomib only. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced the mean bortezomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by approximately 23% (118 vs 93 ng/mL) and the mean area under plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC72) by approximately 45% (223 vs 123 ng.h/mL). Co-administration of dexamethasone had no effect on mean AUC72 (179 vs 170 ng.h/mL). The mean bortezomib Cmax was 20% lower after co-administration of dexamethasone (140 vs 119 ng/mL); however this difference in Cmax was within the observed variability in Cmax during cycle 2 (CV=38%) and cycle 3 (CV=45%). Mean (SD) maximum percent proteasome inhibition (Emax) and area under percent proteasome inhibition-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUE72h) were comparable for bortezomib alone and in combination with rifampicin (Emax: 61.9 [4.56] vs. 62.3 [3.81] and AUE72h: 836 [323] vs. 777 [358]). Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the Emax (66.7 [4.27] vs. 61.8 [6.69]) or AUE72h (1329 [638] vs. 1157 [381]). Safety profiles were consistent with prior bortezomib experience in this population. Drug-related serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were reported in 7/30 (23%) and 8/30 (27%) in bortezomib-only, in 3/13 (23%) and 3/13 (23%) in bortezomib + rifampicin, and 3/18 (17%) and 5/18 (28%) in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Investigator-assessed responses (CR+PR) were observed in 13/17 MM and 6/13 NHL patients in bortezomib-only, in 6/9 MM and 3/4 NHL patients in bortezomib + rifampicin, and in 10/13 MM and 2/5 NHL patients in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Conclusions: Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the PK or PD profiles of bortezomib. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced bortezomib exposure (AUC) by approximately 45%. Patients receiving bortezomib concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inducers, such as rifampicin, should be monitored for reduction in clinical effect, while concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers, such as dexamethasone, is not expected to affect the bortezomib pharmacologic profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Rule:Johnson & Johson: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Walewski:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Investigators fee. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patel:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skee:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Girgis:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Louw:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Key Oncologics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life by ECOG Performance Status and Fatigue Among Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4591-4591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris L. Pashos ◽  
Christopher R Flowers ◽  
Mark Weiss ◽  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Charles M Farber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4591 Introduction: Clinicians and investigators appreciate the value of measuring HRQOL for monitoring CLL and the impact of treatments, and commonly use ECOG performance status (PS) and clinician-reported patient fatigue as surrogates for HRQOL in clinical practice. However, limited data exist on the relationships between PS, fatigue, and HRQOL in CLL patients (pts) undergoing treatment in clinical practices. We examined the associations between these measures and 3 psychometrically validated, patient-reported, HRQOL instruments: the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), EQ-5D, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu). Methods: Data were collected as part of Connect CLL®, a prospective observational registry initiated in March 2010 involving US practices. Data on pt demographics and clinical characteristics were provided by clinicians. HRQOL was self-reported by pts at enrollment using the BFI, EQ-5D, and FACT-Leu. Mean BFI, EQ-5D and FACT-Leu scores were analyzed by ECOG PS and clinician-reported fatigue. Differences in HRQOL scores between sub-cohorts were assessed by ANOVA. Results: HRQOL data were reported by 604 pts enrolled from 10 academic, 148 community, and 3 government centers. Pts were predominantly male (62%) and white (90%); mean age was 70 (standard deviation 11) years. BFI data (scale: 0 [no fatigue] - 10 [worst fatigue]) indicated that on average pts report that global fatigue, fatigue severity and fatigue-related interference worsen by ECOG severity (Table 1) and are statistically associated with clinician-reported fatigue (Table 2). Mean EQ-5D overall HRQOL as measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) worsens by ECOG severity and is significantly worse in pts with fatigue. Mean EQ-5D domain scores (scale: 1 [no problem], 2 [some problems], 3 [incapacity]) indicated that pain/discomfort, mobility and usual activities increase in severity as ECOG worsens and in pts with fatigue. FACT-Leu domains except social/family were statistically worse with worse ECOG PS and in pts with fatigue. Conclusions: Initial results from Connect CLL® indicate that HRQOL worsens with worsening ECOG PS, especially in physical / functioning domains, pain/discomfort, and mobility, and worsens across multiple domains among pts whose physicians reported fatigue. Future analyses should be conducted on how HRQOL, PS and fatigue may change over time with changes in CLL, and how they are influenced by therapies. These results may serve as baseline reference. Disclosures: Pashos: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Genentech/Roche (unpaid): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Weiss:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lamanna:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Farber:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Lerner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grinblatt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kozloff:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swern:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kahn:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Street:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Keating:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Results of the OPAL Study: A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Tosedostat (CHR-2797) in Elderly Subjects with Treatment Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 767-767
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Eric J Feldman ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Anjali S. Advani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 767 Background: Tosedostat is a novel oral inhibitor of the M1/17 family of aminopeptidases which induces an amino acid deprivation response that is selectively toxic for myeloid blasts (Leuk Res. 2011: 5:677-81) and has shown promising activity in elderly relapsed/refractory AML patients (J Clin Oncol 2010:28:4333-8). Aims: The OPAL study was undertaken to compare the activity of tosedostat at a once-daily dose of 120 mg for 24 weeks compared to 240 mg once daily for 8 weeks followed by 120 mg once daily for a further 16 weeks., as measured by bone marrow and hematology responses at 24 weeks. Methods: This was a phase II randomized (1:1) multi-center study. Patients were eligible if aged 60 years or older with previous CR lasting <12 months, or no CR after primary therapy, had a peripheral blast count <30,000/μl, PS<2 and adequate renal, hepatic and cardiac function. The primary analysis was performed at 24 weeks using IWG 2003 criteria. Results: Seventy-three patients were randomized and received tosedostat, 38 at 120 mg and 35 at 240 mg. Median age was 72 (range, 64 to 86), and 59% were male. Twenty-six patients (36%) had secondary or therapy-related AML, of which 19 (26%) had prior MDS. Median time since AML diagnosis was 211 days and 38% had received primary therapy with cytarabine/anthracyclines; 36% with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and 23% with other cytarabine regimes. Fifty-two percent had been refractory to primary therapy, 19% had previously had a remission of up to 6 months and 29% a 6–12 month remission (mean 97 days including refractory). Twenty-three patients (32%) had no post-treatment bone marrow sample taken, predominantly due to early progression: 34% completed 12 weeks on study and 14% completed 24 weeks and were eligible to enter an extension study which is ongoing. The overall response rate was 22%; (CR/CRp/MLFS 12%; PR 10%) and an additional 29% had a best response of stable disease. The most common adverse events which occurred (total; grade 3 or worse) were diarrhea (58%; 4.1%), peripheral edema (55%; 0%), fatigue (49%; 21%), dyspnea (41%; 16%), nausea (38%; 0%), decreased appetite (37%; 3%), febrile neutropenia (36%; 29%) and hypotension (36%, 10%). Median overall survival (OS) (at 15 July 2011) was 126 days. Median OS in patients with CR/CRp/MLFS, PR and SD were 280, 195 and 162 days respectively, and 261.5 days for patients with a response of PR or better. Median OS for patients with progression of disease or who were unevaluable was 61 days. Similar responses were seen in the two dose groups. Additional non protocol-specified analyses showed that the following types of patient appeared to respond well: AML NOC vs other AML types 16% vs 29% response, median OS 75 vs 168 days; patients with poor risk cytogenetics compared to intermediate/better, median OS 159 vs 107 days; those who received prior HMA compared to others, 38% vs 13% response, median OS 171 vs 104 days; and absence of prior CR 29% vs 14% response and median OS 169 vs 103 days. Conclusions: These results provide further encouraging evidence of efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile in a difficult to treat patient population. A phase III program of pivotal studies with tosedostat in AML and MDS will start in the near future. Disclosures: Cortes: Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Feldman:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Yee:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rizzieri:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Advani:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Charman:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Toal:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Chroma Therapeutics Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Safety and Immunogenicity Of Inactivated Varicella-Zoster Virus Vaccine In Adults With Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Treatment With Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290
Author(s):  
Shelly McNeil ◽  
Robert Betts ◽  
Steven Lawrence ◽  
Andrea Velardi ◽  
Eva Kimby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ifn Γ ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Background Herpes zoster (HZ) incidence is higher in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) (25-100 cases/1000 person-years) than in the general population (3-5 cases/1000 person-years). This immunocompromised population can experience significant morbidity and occasional mortality from complications associated with reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV). In general, there is limited data in the literature regarding the effect of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, used in treatment of HM patients, on vaccine-related cell-mediated immune response. Due to the potential negative impact of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies on vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy, HM patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been excluded from prior inactivated VZV vaccine (inactivated-ZV) studies. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of inactivated-ZV in HM patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy. Methods This was an open label, single arm, multicenter Phase I study of a 4-dose inactivated-ZV regimen (∼30 days between each dose) in patients ≥18 years old with HM receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies either as a single agent or in a combination chemotherapy regimen and not likely to undergo HCT (n=80). Blood samples were collected at baseline prior to dose 1 and 28 days postdose 4 to measure VZV-specific T-cell responses using interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISPOT). The primary hypothesis was that inactivated-ZV would elicit significant VZV-specific immune responses at ∼28 days postdose 4, with the statistical criterion being that the lower bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) on the geometric fold rise (GMFR) be >1.0. All vaccinated patients were evaluated for adverse events (AE), including VZV-like rashes, through 28 days postdose 4. Results The 4-dose inactivated-ZV regimen elicited a statistically significant VZV-specific immune response measured by IFN-γ ELISPOT at 28 days postdose 4 in the per-protocol population (GMFR = 4.34 [90% CI: 3.01, 6.24], p-value <0.001). As the lower bound of the 2-sided 90% CI for GMFR was >1.0, the pre-specified primary immunogenicity success criterion was met. Overall, 85% (68/80) of patients reported ≥1 AEs, 44% (35/80) reported ≥1 injection-site AEs, and 74% (59/80) reported ≥1 systemic AEs. The most common injection-site AEs were pain (32%), erythema (31%), and swelling (26%). The most common systemic AEs were pyrexia (25%) and diarrhea (14%). Twelve patients (15%) experienced serious AEs, including one event determined by the investigator to be vaccine-related (convulsion: day 8 postdose 1). One patient experienced a fatal serious AE (Richter’s transformation to Hodgkin’s disease; day 34 postdose 1) assessed as not vaccine-related by the investigator. In general, the frequencies of AEs did not increase with subsequent doses of vaccine. No inactivated-ZV recipient had a rash that was PCR positive for VZV vaccine strain. Conclusions In adults with HM receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, inactivated-ZV was well tolerated and elicited statistically significant VZV-specific T-cell responses ∼28 days postdose 4. Disclosures: McNeil: Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Betts:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Lawrence:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Velardi:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Kimby:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Pagnoni:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stek:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chan:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lee:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parrino:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Ublituximab (TG-1101), a Novel Glycoengineered Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination with Ibrutinib Is Highly Active in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory CLL and MCL; Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4679-4679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Charles M. Farber ◽  
Daruka Mahadevan ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Heather D. Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Efficacy Assessment ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) which targets a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen and has been glycoengineered to enhance affinity for all variants of FcγRIIIa receptors, demonstrating greater antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity than rituximab and ofatumumab, particularly against cells that express low CD20 levels. Two Phase I trials of single agent UTX in relapsed/refractory CLL reported significant response rates with rapid and sustained lymphocyte depletion and a manageable safety profile. Ibrutinib, a novel oral BTK inhibitor approved for patients with previously treated CLL and MCL, displays high single agent activity and has reported increased activity in combination with non-glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAbs. Herein we report safety and efficacy data on the first combination of ibrutinib with a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, UTX, from an ongoing Phase 2 trial. Methods: Eligible patients have relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL or MCL with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. The study was designed to assess safety, tolerability, and early overall response rate, with an initial safety run-in period consisting of 6 patients followed by open enrollment. UTX (Cohorts of 600 and 900 mg for CLL and at 900 mg for MCL patients) is administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in Cycle 1 followed by Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6. Ibrutinib is started on Day 1 and continues daily at 420 mg and 560 mg for CLL and MCL patients respectively. Following Cycle 6, patients come off study but remain on ibrutinib. Primary endpoint for safety: Adverse Events and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) during safety run-in. Phase II primary efficacy endpoint: ORR with an emphasis on early activity with response assessments by CT scan scheduled prior to cycles 3 and 6 only. Results: 40 patients (33 CLL/ 7 MCL) have been enrolled to date with enrollment continuing. 23 M/17 F, median age 72 yr (range 52-86), ECOG 0/1/2: 20/19/1, median prior Tx = 2 (range 1-6), 38% with ≥ 2 prior anti-CD20 therapies; prior purine analog = 43%; prior alkylating agent = 68%; and prior purine and alkylating agent = 43%. No DLTs were observed during the safety run-in. Gr 3/4 AE’s occurring in at least 5% of patients and at least possibly related to UTX and/or ibrutinib included: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, rash, leukocytosis, and infusion related reaction. There were no Grade 3/4 adverse events reported in ≥ 10% of patients. Ibrutinib was dose reduced due to an AE in 2 patients (1 diarrhea, 1 rash) and discontinued in 2 patients due to ibrutinib related AE’s (diarrhea and rash). IRR’s were managed with infusion interruptions with no patient requiring an ublituximab dose reduction. As of July 2014, 24/40 patients are evaluable for response. Best response to treatment is as follows: TableTypePts (n)CR (n)PR (n)SD (n)ORR (%)CLL non 17p/11q10-9190%17p/11q817-100%Total CLL18116194%MCL632183% The one CLL patient who achieved stable disease had a 46% nodal reduction. UTX appears to control ibrutinib related lymphocytosis with more than half of the patients within normal range for ALC by first efficacy assessment. Conclusions: Data suggests ublituximab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, in combination with ibrutinib is both well-tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and MCL. ORR was 94% in patients with CLL (100% in patients with high risk CLL: 17p, 11q del with 1 CR), with responses attained rapidly (median TTR: 8 weeks). In MCL, 83% of patients achieved a response at first efficacy assessment, with 50% of patients achieving a CR by week 20. For most patients, responses improved by the second efficacy assessment. The addition of ublituximab appears to mitigate ibrutinib related lymphocytosis producing earlier clinical responses than historically seen with ibrutinib monotherapy. Efficacy and safety will be updated on all enrolled patients. Disclosures Sharman: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Farber:Leukemia Lymphoma Society NJ Chapter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Stock ownership Other. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Kolibaba:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Glaxo Smithkline: Research Funding. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenwald:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document