The Clinical Utility of Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5373-5373
Author(s):  
Shahdabul Faraz ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
Sujitha Yadlapati ◽  
David Jayabalan ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Markers ◽  
Bone Marker ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Bone Formation Markers ◽  
Impending Fracture

Abstract Introduction: While bone resorption markers such as urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTx) have long been used in research, serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) has become the preferred marker of bone status in multiple myeloma (MM). A full understanding of the clinical utility of CTx, as well as the bone formation markers osteocalcin (OC) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), in MM is still lacking. In this study, we evaluated levels of CTx, OC, and BSAP in a cohort of MM patients to better understand their roles. Methods: One set of CTx, OC, and BSAP data was obtained by random sampling in patients during a 60-day window at the Weill Cornell Medical College Myeloma Center. Bone marker changes were assessed with respect to type of myeloma therapy, response status, use of anti-resorptive therapy, and presence of osteolytic lesions or fractures. Additionally, we tested the ability of the bone markers to isolate a high fracture risk group, as defined by radiologic evidence of impending fracture. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to assess clinical variables, and a 2-sided t value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: 50 patients were identified with bone marker data, of which 47 had MM and 3 had MM precursor diseases. The mean age was 64 years, with 25 males and 25 females. All three markers CTx (p=0.001), OC (p=0.004), and BSAP (p<0.001) significantly decreased with myeloma therapy initiation. Only CTx, however, was significantly lower in patients who achieved a partial response or greater, compared to non-responders (p=0.010). Moreover, only CTx decreased significantly in patients using anti-resorptive therapy within one year of bone marker date (p=0.006). Both CTx (p=0.011) and BSAP (p=0.005) were significantly higher in patients with more than 5 osteolytic lesions compared to those without such lesions. Additionally, only CTx predicted which patients were at risk for impending fracture (p<0.001). Of 8 patients in this high-risk group for fractures, 2 developed new pathological fractures within 1 month of the CTx test. CTx values were significantly higher in patients who were taking both proteasome inhibitor (PI) and alkylating agents compared to those only taking PIs (p<0.001). Choice of PI also affected levels of bone markers, with patients receiving bortezomib having significantly higher levels of CTx (p=0.019) than those on carfilzomib. BSAP levels were similarly higher, with a trend toward significance (p=0.064). Discussion: Of the evaluated bone markers, only CTx correlated with response to anti-MM therapy and risk of impending fracture. Additionally, CTx reflects the extent of bone disease. CTx levels decreased with use of anti-resorptive therapy within one year of bone marker date, but not with longer time points. This suggests the clinical benefit of at least annual dosing of anti-resorptive therapy and indicates the dynamic nature of this marker. The high CTx values in the PI plus alkylating group may also suggest that PI alone is more effective in addressing bone disease in such patients. Differences in CTx between individual proteasome inhibitors points to agent-specific effects of PI on bone remodeling, which warrant further investigation. The potential increase in BSAP with bortezomib versus carfilzomib treatment is consistent with recent findings, which show that bortezomib promotes osteoblastic differentiation and bone formation. As opposed to our CTx data, OC and BSAP did not prognosticate disease response or future fractures or correlate with use of anti-resorptive therapy, suggesting limited utility of these bone formation markers in MM. Table 1. Bone Marker Category MM Therapy Initiation MM Therapy Responders ART Use Within 1 Year ART Use Before 1 Year Lytic Lesions Present 5+ lytic Lesions Present Risk of Future Fracture PI Plus Alkylator CTx Bone Resorption ↓↓ ↓ ↓↓ NS ↑ ↑↑ ↑↑ ↑↑↑ OC Bone Formation ↓↓ NS NS NS NS NS NS NS BSAP Bone Formation ↓↓ NS NS NS ↑ ↑↑ NS ↑ Abbreviations: CTx, C-terminal telopeptide; OC, osteocalcin; BSAP, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; MM, multiple myeloma; ART, anti-resorptive therapy; NS, not significant; PI, proteasome inhibitor. Single arrow represents a change by a factor of less than 2. Double arrows represent a change by a factor of greater than 2. Triple arrows represent a change by a factor of greater than 3. Disclosures Pearse: Celegen: Consultancy. Rossi:Calgene: Speakers Bureau. Mark:Calgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lane:Agnovos Healthcare, LLC: Consultancy; Bone Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CollPlant Holdings, Ltd.: Consultancy; D'Fine, Inc.: Consultancy; Gradtys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ISTO Technologies, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kuros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Royal Consulting & Marketing: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Impact of Daratumumab Monotherapy on Bone Parameters in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least 2 Prior Lines of Therapy Including Lenalidomide and a Proteasome Inhibitor; Interim Analysis of a Phase 2 Study (the REBUILD Study)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1837-1837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Eftathios Kastritis ◽  
Evdoxia Hatjiharissi ◽  
Eirini Katodritou ◽  
Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Formation Markers ◽  
Tracp 5B ◽  
Median Change

Introduction: A major clinical feature of multiple myeloma (MM) is osteolytic bone disease, with bone resorption prevailing bone formation. Daratumumab, an IgG1κ human monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, has been licensed for use in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM); however, its effect on bone disease has not yet been determined in a clinical setting. CD38 expression has been associated with osteoclast formation and bone resorption in in vitro studies and treatment with daratumumab has demonstrated an inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis. This study aims to evaluate the impact of daratumumab monotherapy on biochemical markers of bone metabolism in RRMM pts. Methods: REBUILD is an ongoing prospective, multicenter, non-comparative, open-label, phase II study aiming to enroll 57 adult pts with documented RRMM who have had ≥2 prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Pts should have a Karnofsky Performance Status score of ≥70, and a creatinine clearance of ≥30 mL/min. Exclusion criteria include previous treatment with daratumumab or other anti-CD38 therapy. Pts receive daratumumab at a weekly dose of 16 mg/kg for Cycles 1-2, every 2 weeks for Cycles 3-6 and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint of this study is the change from baseline in the bone resorption markers C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP-5b) after 4 months of daratumumab monotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the change at 4 months from baseline in bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [bALP], osteocalcin [OC], and procollagen type-I N-propeptide [PINP]), in markers of osteoclast regulation (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand [RANKL], osteoprotegerin [OPG] and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand-3 [CCL-3]), osteoblast control (sclerostin, dickkopf-1 [DKK-1]), and progression-free survival (PFS). This interim analysis included pts who received the first dose of study treatment at least 6 months before the cut-off date (26/04/2019). Results: Twenty-seven pts had been enrolled in 5 study centres of the Greek Myeloma Study Group, and among them 15 had both biomarker and clinical data available after 4 months of therapy and they were included in the present analyses. The median number of previous therapies was 3. Nine (60%) pts had >10 lytic bone lesions at screening. Only 3/15 (20%) pts received bisphosphonates along with daratumumab monotherapy. Regarding the primary endpoint, the median change of CTX and TRACP-5b levels at 4 months from baseline was 13.4%, and -2.6%, respectively. The median change in CTX and TRACP-5b levels at 4 months from baseline for pts with partial response or better (≥PR) (n=7, 46.7%) was 13.4% and -9.4%, respectively; among pts with minimal response or stable disease (n=6, 40%) the change in CTX and TRACP-5b levels was 16.4% and 14.3%, respectively. The levels of all bone formation markers bALP, OC, and PINP showed a median increase at 4 months from baseline by 18.4%, 190.5%, and 19.3%, respectively. For pts with ≥PR, the median change at 4 months from baseline in bALP, OC, and PINP levels was even higher: 25.3%, 338.7%, and 19.3%, respectively. Interestingly, the median change at 4 months from baseline in osteoblast inhibitors sclerostin and DKK-1 levels was -20.3%, and -6.5%, respectively. The median PFS for all 27 pts enrolled was 7.1 months. Conclusions: Regarding the primary endpoint of the REBUILD study, results from this interim analysis indicate that daratumumab monotherapy decreases TRACP-5b levels, which was more pronounced in responders, but this is not accompanied by a reduction in CTX. An effect on CTX levels may become evident with additional follow-up. However, a clear increase in serum levels of all markers of bone formation tested (bALP, OC, PINP) was observed, especially among responders, which might at least partially be explained by a reduction of the osteoblast inhibitors sclerostin and DKK-1. Thus, daratumumab monotherapy in this RRMM population (heavily pre-treated pts with multiple lytic bone lesions and limited use of bisphosphonates) results in a decrease in TRACP-5b and osteoblast inhibitors and an increase in bone formation markers, suggesting an overall positive impact on bone remodeling. The study is ongoing and updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Terpos: Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Genesis: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Medison: Honoraria. Kastritis:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria. Hatjiharissi:Janssen: Honoraria. Katodritou:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Gavriatopoulou:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Genesis: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Honoraria. Leonidakis:HeaDS: Employment. Delimpasi:Janssen: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Symeonidis:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Tekeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Sanofi Oncology: Research Funding.

High Dose Simvastatin Has No Beneficial Effect on Markers of Bone Turn-Over in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4824-4824
Author(s):  
Teis E. Sondergaard ◽  
Per T. Pedersen ◽  
Thomas L. Andersen ◽  
Thomas Lund ◽  
Patrick Garnero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Osteoclast Activity ◽  
Bone Formation Markers ◽  
Bone Degradation ◽  
Activity Trap

Abstract Background: Bone degradation in multiple myeloma (MM) is a result of increased bone degradation by osteoclasts that is not compensated for by bone forming osteoblasts. Ideally new drugs used for treatment of MM should target not only the myeloma cells but also the imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation. Statins have been shown to inhibit myeloma cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in vitro. Furthermore statins have been shown to stimulate osteoblasts and inhibit osteoclasts both in vitro and in animal models. Statins are normally used at doses around 20–80 mg/day, but in order to reach serum concentrations that can match the in vitro experiments MM patients were treated with 15 mg/kg/day of Simvastatin (HD-Sim) divided in two daily doses in this study. This high dose has previously been found to be safe for MM patients (Haematologica 2006, 91,542–545) Patients and methods: Six patients with advanced MM have been included in this pilot study, 4 males and 2 females with an average age of 68 years and an average duration of disease of 43 months. The patients were treated with 2 cycles of HD-Sim for seven days followed by a break of 21 days in a 4-weeks cycle. Two of the patients were treated with bisphosphonates during the study, and 4 had previously been treated with bisphosphonates. Endpoints are change in concentrations of markers of osteoclast activity (TRAP) or bone resorption (CTX, NTX, ICTP) or markers of bone formation (Osteocalcin and PINP). Cholesterol, OPG and DDK-1 were also measured. Results: Two patients completed the protocol with two cycles of HD-Sim at full dose, 2 patients were reduced to 7.5 mg/kg/day simvastatin in cycle 2 due to nausea and diarrhea and 2 patients left the protocol after 3 weeks (deaths not related to high dose simvastatin). All patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity grade 1–2. Myalgia and other muscular symptoms grade 1–2 were reported by 5 patients but were not associated with an increase in creatin kinase. TRAP and NTX activity in serum increased for all 6 patients during the seven days of treatment with HD-Sim indicating that bone resorption may have been stimulated rather than inhibited. The other markers of bone resorption and the bone formation markers showed no change. All patients responded with a significantly reduced level of cholesterol in serum. None of the patients showed any reduction in free monoclonal light chains or monoclonal proteins in serum during treatment with HD-Sim and 2 of the 4 patients completing the protocol showed progression of diseases. Conclusion: This pilot study of HD-Sim in advanced MM has been terminated due to lack of response and evidence from two markers of osteoclast activity (TRAP) and bone resorption (NTX) that HD-Sim may be harmful rather than beneficial in MM.

Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone as Primary Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Significantly Decreases Bone Resorption While Sparing Bone Formation as Compared to Thalidomide-Dexamethasone

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5117-5117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Giulia Perrone ◽  
Michela Ceccolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Bone Formation Markers

Abstract Bone disease occurs in approximately 80% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and is caused by the interaction of the neoplastic clone with bone marrow microenvironment, ultimately resulting in an altered balance between bone resorption and bone formation. It has been previously reported that therapies aimed at eradicating the myeloma clone could contribute to decrease bone resorption, even though bone formation remains impaired even in responding patients, due to the use of high-dose steroids. It has been recently demonstrated, both in vitro and in animal models, that Bortezomib improves bone formation by stimulating osteoblasts. In order to test whether this activity was retained also in vivo, we evaluated markers of bone resorption (serum crosslaps) and bone formation (serum osteocalcin-OC and bone alkaline phosphatase - BAP) in a series of patients who were enrolled in the “Bologna 2005” phase III clinical trial at our Center. By study design, after registration patients were randomized to receive three 21-days courses of induction therapy with either VTD (Bortezomib, 1.3 mg/sqm on d 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus Dexamethasone, 40 mg on each day of and after Bortezomib administration plus Thalidomide 200 mg/d from d 1 to 63.) or TD (Thalidomide as in VTD and Dexamethasone 40 mg/d on d 1–4 and 9–12 of every 21-d cycle), prior to stem cell collection and double autologous stem cell transplantation. As of January 2008, 27 patients (19 male and 8 female, median age = 57.5 yrs) entered the sub-study; of these, 15 and 12 patients were randomized in the VTD and TD arm, respectively. At diagnosis, both groups of patients showed a marked increase in serum crosslaps as compared to upper baseline limit (7321±1445pmol/L in the VTD arm and 11140±2576pmol/L in the TD arm) while both OC and BAP were reduced as compared to lower baseline limits. After completion of the induction therapy, serum crosslaps were significantly decreased in both treatment groups (2747±319pmol/L in VTD arm, p=0.007; 3686±1084pmol/L in the TD arm, p=0.0015). In the TD group a significant further reduction in bone formation markers was also observed (42% reduction in serum OC and 30% in BAP, p=0.03 and 0.04 as compared to pre-treatment values); on the contrary, in the VTD arm both OC and BAP were not significantly decreased as compared to baseline values (15% and 11% for OC and BAP, respectively). These data suggest that incorporation of Bortezomib into induction therapy counteracts the inhibitory effects of high-dose steroids on osteoblastogenesis, thus sparing bone formation.

Consolidation Therapy with Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (VTD) Regimen After ASCT in Myeloma Patients Who Do Not Receive Bisphosphonates Reduces Bone Resorption and RANKL/OPG Ratio but Seems to Have No Effect On Bone Formation and Angiogenesis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3863-3863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Dimitrios Christoulas ◽  
Magdalini Migkou ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Athanasios Papatheodorou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Metabolism ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Osteoblastic Activity ◽  
Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Bone Formation Markers ◽  
Tracp 5B ◽  
Angiogenic Cytokines

Abstract Abstract 3863 Poster Board III-799 Bortezomib (V) monotherapy is associated with increased osteoblastic activity, reduced osteoclast function and decreased angiogenesis in relapsed/refractory myeloma (MM). The co-administration of zoledronic acid in all reported studies to-date may suggest a synergistic stimulation on osteoclast/osteoblast interactions by the two agents but has not allowed the independent evaluation of V on bone metabolism. Furthermore, the combination of V with other agents, such as thalidomide (T), melphalan (M) and dexamethasone (D), although it reduced osteoclast activity, it did not enhance osteoblast function. We evaluated the effect of VTD consolidation on bone metabolism and angiogenesis in MM patients who underwent high-dose M followed by ASCT. In this prospective study, only patients in first remission or with primary refractory disease to one frontline treatment were included. Patients did not receive any bisphosphonate during or post-ASCT as well as throughout the period of VTD consolidation. VTD started on day 100 after ASCT: V was administered at a dose of 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11; T was given at a dose of 100 mg/day, po, on days 1-21 and D at a dose of 40 mg/day on days 1–4 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received 4 cycles of VTD (first block), were followed without treatment for 100 days and then received another 4 cycles of VTD (2nd block). Patients were assessed for skeletal-related events (SREs) throughout the period of the study (12 months). Bone remodeling was studied by the measurement of the following serum indices before and after each block of VTD (4 measurements for each patient): i) osteoclast regulators [sRANKL and osteoprotegerin (OPG)], ii) osteoblast inhibitor dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1), iii) bone resorption markers (CTX and TRACP-5b) and iv) bone formation markers [bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP) and osteocalcin (OC)]. Angiogenic cytokines such as VEGF, angiogenin (ANG), angiopoietin (Angp)-1 and -2, and bFGF were also studied on the same dates. So far, 32 patients have completed the first block of VTD, while 16 patients have completed both VTD blocks. Just before VDT administration, 10 patients were in CR (4 in sCR), 14 in vgPR and 8 in PR. Although most of these patients were rated as vgPR or better, they had increased serum levels of sRANKL (p=0.037), Dkk-1 (p=0.001), CTX (p=0.002), TRACP-5b (p<0.001), VEGF (p<0.001), bFGF (p<0.001), ANG (p=0.006) and reduced levels of Angp-1/Angp-2 ratio (p<0.001) compared to 18 healthy controls of similar age and gender, indicating sustained osteoclast and angiogenic activity despite minimal tumor load. Levels of sRANKL and Dkk-1 positively correlated with resorption markers (p<0.01). The first block of VTD resulted in a significant reduction of sRANKL (p=0.001), sRANKL/OPG (p=0.005), CTX (p=0.001), TRACP-5b (p=0.032), but also of bALP (p=0.022) and OC (p=0.02), while Dkk-1 and the majority of angiogenic cytokines showed no alterations (only Angp-1/Angp-2 ratio had a borderline increase, p=0.044). After the first block of VTD, 39% of patients improved their status of response; however alterations of the studied molecules were irrespective of further response or not improvement. Before the administration of the 2nd block of VTD, RANKL, RANKL/OPG and CTX were reduced compared to values after the first block of VTD (p=0.01, p=0.027 and p=0.005, respectively). These parameters were further reduced after the completion of the study (p<0.05). On the contrary, Dkk-1 was increased between the end of the first block of VTD and the initiation of the 2nd (p=0.008) but was reduced after the 2nd block of VTD (p=0.037). OC had no further alterations, while bALP was increased before the 2nd block of VTD (p=0.012) and showed no changes thereafter. VEGF, ANG, and Angp-1/Angp-2 were increased during the resting period between the two VTD blocks and remained unchanged thereafter. During the study period, only one patient developed a SRE (i.e. radiation to bone). As of July 2009, 8 of 32 patients have developed progressive disease. The median TTP after ASCT was 27 months (CI 95% 16.3-37.6). The results of this ongoing study suggest that VTD consolidation post-ASCT, without the presence of bisphosphonates, reduces RANKL and bone resorption and is associated with a very low incidence of SREs. However, bortezomib was not able to produce a significant anabolic effect on bones when combined with TD even in these patients with low myeloma burden, while its effect on angiogenic cytokines was modest. Disclosures: Terpos: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Selective HDAC6 Inhibition Via ACY-1215, Either Alone or in Combination with Bortezomib, Restores Osteoblast Function and Suppresses Osteoclast Differentiation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2908-2908
Author(s):  
Loredana Santo ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Andrew L. Kung ◽  
Jen-Chieh Tseng ◽  
David Tamang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Homeostasis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Synergistic Cytotoxicity

Abstract Abstract 2908 Bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) is due to the disruption of the delicate balance between osteoblast (OB)-mediated bone formation and osteoclast (OC)-mediated bone resorption. Agents that target both tumor cells and restore normal bone homeostasis can improve long-term disease control and prolong MM patient survival. It has been demonstrated that in vitro pan HDAC inhibitors accelerate OB maturation and suppress OC maturation, while bortezomib triggers OB activation and inhibits osteoclastogenesis. However it has recently been shown that vorinostat (SAHA), a non-selective HDAC inhibitor, causes bone loss in vivo by inhibiting immature OB. Here, we evaluated effects of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-1215 (Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc), alone and in combination with bortezomib, on MM cell growth and related bone disease. ACY-1215 in combination with bortezomib has synergistic cytotoxicity due to simultaneous inhibition of the proteasome and aggresome pathways. We confirm the in vivo anti-MM activity of ACY-1215 in combination with bortezomib in two different xenograft mouse models: human MM injected subcutaneously; and luciferase-expressing human MM injected intravenously (disseminated MM model). Tumor growth was significantly delayed and overall host survival significantly prolonged in animals treated with combined therapy (34 vs 22 days, n=7, p<0.0011) in plasmacytoma model and (40 vs 17 days, n=12, p<0.0001) in disseminated model. Importantly, we show that ACY-1215 alone and in combination with bortezomib overcomes the proliferative effect of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and cytokines. MM cells stimulate OC formation and function, while inhibiting OB differentiation via both cell-to-cell contact and cytokine secretion. Therefore, osteoclastogenesis is an important therapeutic target in MM. In this context, we evaluated the effect of ACY-1215 (1μM) and bortezomib (2.5nM) on OCs generated from blood mononuclear cells stimulated with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL). ACY-1215 alone and in combination with bortezomib inhibited OC differentiation, evidenced by a decreased number of TRAP positive multinucleated cells and bone-resorbing activity. In addition, ACY-1215 (1μM) significantly decreased cell growth of mature OC in co-culture with MM cell lines. We next examined the effect of ACY-1215, alone and in combination with bortezomib, on downstream targets in RANKL/RANK signaling. ACY-1215 plus bortezomib inhibits transcription factors implicated in OC differentiation including p-ERK, p-AKT, c-FOS and NFATC1. Since there is decreased OB function and new bone formation in MM, we next assessed the effect of ACY-1215 on OB differentiation. ACY-1215, alone and in combination, enhanced OB differentiation, evidenced by increased alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity and alizarin red staining. In addition, we show increased mRNA expression of b-catenin, osteocalcin, Runx2 and Sp7 (OB differentiation markers) in immature OB triggered by ACY-1215. Finally, ACY-1215 was not toxic to PHA stimulated PBMCs, suggesting a favorable side effect profile and therapeutic index. Our studies therefore demonstrate that ACY-1215, alone and in combination with bortezomib, can inhibit osteoclastogenesis enhance osteoblastogenesis, and inhibit MM cell growth. Based upon these studies, ongoing clinical trials are examining the efficacy of ACY-1215 in relapsed MM and associated bone disease. Disclosures: Hideshima: Acetylon: Consultancy. Kung:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Tamang:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Yang:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Jarpe:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. van Duzer:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Mazitschek:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bradner:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Anderson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: founder; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jones:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Research Funding.

Evolving Unmet Need in Patients Refractory to Lenalidomide: Overview of the Clinical Trials in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Rohan Medhekar ◽  
Istvan Majer ◽  
Mehmet Turgut
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Introduction: The majority of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients are currently treated with lenalidomide-based regimens as their first line of therapy. This trend is likely to continue in the coming years. Typically, lenalidomide is administered until disease progression and has significantly contributed to better outcomes in these patients. However, most patients relapse, and prognosis worsens with each relapse. The choice of optimal treatment for patients who relapse while receiving lenalidomide as first line of therapy is unclear. Moreau et al (Blood Cancer J. 9, 38 [2019]) concluded that there is limited data on approved combinations for treating these patients and are restricted by the low number of lenalidomide-refractory patients enrolled in the pivotal trials. Results from the ongoing clinical trials of the combination of carfilzomib and anti-CD38 antibodies were not available at the time of the Moreau et al publication. The aim of this targeted literature review was to include this new data and to summarize currently available evidence on progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment of RRMM patients who progressed on lenalidomide-based regimens. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify registrational clinical trials in patients with RRMM reporting PFS outcomes. PubMed, congress proceedings, and product labels were searched between Jan 2014 to July 2020. In addition to PFS, demographic, disease characteristics and treatment history were extracted for the trial populations to contextualize potential variations in study outcomes. The regimens studied in these trials were classified as lenalidomide-based, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based and pomalidomide-based. Number of prior lines of therapy, prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide and bortezomib were reported. Results: Twelve registrational trials were identified based on the search criteria (Table 1). Most pivotal trials assessing lenalidomide-based regimens (POLLUX, ELOQUENT-II, TOURMALINE-MM1) except the ASPIRE trial excluded patients who were refractory to lenalidomide. Trials evaluating PI-based regimens (e.g., CANDOR) or pomalidomide-based regimens (e.g., OPTIMISMM) included these patients, with more recent studies enrolling a larger proportion. Percentage of lenalidomide-exposed (and lenalidomide refractory) ranged from 40% (32%) in CANDOR to 98% (90%) in ELOQUENT III. These studies also enrolled a larger proportion of patients who were bortezomib-exposed, although most of these patients were at first relapse, with the exception of ELOQUENT III and ICARIA where most patients were at third relapse. Among lenalidomide-refractory patients, the median-PFS (mPFS) observed for the pomalidomide-based regimens ranged from 9.5 to 10.1 months and that observed for PI-based regimens ranged from 4.9 to 25.7 months. PFS in the lenalidomide-refractory subgroup was considerably shorter than in the ITT population. The mPFS for patients receiving carfilzomib/daratumumab/dexamethasone (KDd; CANDOR) and isatuximab/carfilzomib/dexamethasone (IsaKd; IKEMA) was not reached at median follow-up of 16.9 and 20.7 months respectively. While the mPFS for (KDd) for lenalidomide-refractory patients in CANDOR trial was not yet reached at median follow up of 16.9 months; the mPFS of 25.7 months for KDd in the MMY-1001 trial appears to be the longest among the assessed regimens. Conclusion: Patients refractory to lenalidomide have shorter PFS and represent a population with high unmet need. This targeted literature review suggests that the PI-based KDd regimen provides longer PFS compared to other lenalidomide-sparing regimens in lenalidomide-refractory populations. Heterogeneity across trial populations may limit the comparability of these treatments. Disclosures Mateos: Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar-Zeltia: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Medhekar:Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Majer:Amgen (Europe) GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

scholarly journals Beta-Blockers Improved Survival Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Evaluation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3306-3306
Author(s):  
Yi L. Hwa ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Cardiac Medication

Abstract Introduction: A recent study revealed an antiproliferative and apoptotic effect of propranolol on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our previous small matched case-control study showed longer survival in patients with propranolol and other beta-blockers (BB) intake than those without. This larger scale study was conducted to confirm the positive association of BB and MM survival. Methods: We identified 1971 newly diagnosed pts seen at Mayo Clinic between 1995 and 2010. Cardiac medication usage after diagnosis of MM was extracted from patient records and categorized based on BB intake. Cause of death was collected with death due to MM as the primary interest event and death due to cardiac disease or other reasons as competing risk events. The primary outcomes were MM disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to estimate the 5-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of MM death and OS rate, respectively. DSS and OS were compared by Gray's test and log-rank test, respectively. Multivarable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted cause-specific HR (HRCSadj.) and hazard ratio (HRadj.) for DSS and OS, respectively, adjusting for demographics, disease characteristics, diagnosis year, and various chemotherapies. Results: 930 (47.2%) of MM patients had no intake of any cardiac medications; 260 (13.2%) had BB only; 343 (17.4%) used both BB / non-BB cardiac medications; and 438 patients (22.2%) had non-BB cardiac drugs. Five-year CIR of MM death and OS rate were shown in table. Superior MM DSS was observed for BB only users, compared to patients without any cardiac drugs (HRCSadj., .53, 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj., .49, 95% CI, .38-.63, padj.<.0001). Patients received both BB and other cardiac drugs also showed superior MM DSS than non-cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj.., .54, 95% CI, .44-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drug users. (HRCSadj., .50, 95% CI, .40-.62, padj.<.0001). MM DSS does not differ between BB users with and without other cardiac drugs (padj.=0.90). Multivariable analysis showed the same pattern for OS. None of the MM therapies impacted the differences in DSS and OS among BB intake groups (interaction padj.>.60). Conclusion: MM patients with BB intake showed reduced risk of death due to MM and overall mortality compared to patients who used non-BB cardiac or never used cardiac drugs. The result warrants further investigation for anti-cancer effect of BB in MM. Disclosures Shi: Mayo Clinic: Employment. Kumar:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy. Gertz:NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Architecture of Sample Preparation and Data Governance of Immuno-Genomic Data Collected from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Samples Obtained from Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Shaadi Mehr ◽  
Daniel Auclair ◽  
Mark Hamilton ◽  
Leon Rozenblit ◽  
Hearn Jay Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
Data Governance ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Data Files

Abstract: Title: Architecture of sample preparation and data governance of Immuno-genomic data collected from bone marrow and peripheral blood samples obtained from multiple myeloma patients In multiple myeloma (MM), the interactions between malignant plasma cells and the bone marrow microenvironment is crucial to fully understand tumor development, disease progression, and response to therapy. The core challenge in understanding those interactions has been the establishment of a standard process and a standard model for handling the data quality workflow and the underlying data models. Here we present the Platform (Figure 1), an integrated data flow architecture designed to create data inventory and process tracking protocols for multi-dimensional and multi-technology immune data files. This system has been designed to inventory and track peripheral blood and bone marrow samples from multiple myeloma subjects submitted for immune analysis under the MMRF Immune Atlas initiative (figure 2), and the processing and storage of Single Cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) and Mass Cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) data files derived from these immune analyses. While these methods have been previously applied on both tumor and immune populations in MM [2,3], this level of multi-institutional and multi-technology is unique. The Cloud Immune-Precision platform contains standardized protocols and bioinformatics workflows for the identification and categorization of immune cell populations and functional states based upon scRNA-seq gene signatures (ref: Bioinformatics manuscript in submission) and CyTOF protein signatures. Upon further expansion, it will contain high dimensional scRNAseq and CyTOF immune data from both bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from myeloma patients enrolled in the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass study (NCT01454297) [1] (Figure 3). The architecture covers the automation of data governance protocols, data transformation and ETL model developments that will create an immune proteomic and profiling database and its integration into clinical and genomics databases: e.g. the MMRF CoMMpass clinical trial. This large-scale data integration will establish a cutting-edge Immune-Precision central platform supporting large scale, immune-focused advanced analytics in multiple myeloma patients. This platform will allow researchers to interrogate the relationships between immune transcriptomic and proteomic signatures and tumor genomic features, and their impact on clinical outcomes, to aid in the optimization of therapy and therapeutic sequencing. Furthermore, this platform also promotes the potential to (further) elucidate the mechanisms-of-action of approved and experimental myeloma therapies, drive biomarker discovery, and identify new targets for drug discovery. Figure 1: Cloud Immune-Precision Platform (Integrated data flow architecture designed to create data inventory and process tracking protocols for multi-dimensional and multi-technology immune data files) Figure 2: Sample tracking process architecture Figure 3: Data file creation and repository process tracking References: 1- Settino, Marzia et al. "MMRF-CoMMpass Data Integration and Analysis for Identifying Prognostic Markers." Computational Science - ICCS 2020: 20th International Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 3-5, 2020, Proceedings, Part III vol. 12139 564-571. 22 May. 2020, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50420-5_42 2- Ledergor, Guy et al. "Single cell dissection of plasma cell heterogeneity in symptomatic and asymptomatic myeloma." Nature medicine vol. 24,12 (2018): 1867-1876. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0269-2 3- Hansmann, Leo et al. "Mass cytometry analysis shows that a novel memory phenotype B cell is expanded in multiple myeloma." Cancer immunology research vol. 3,6 (2015): 650-60. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0236-T Figure 1 Disclosures Bhasin: Canomiiks Inc: Current equity holder in private company, Other: Co-Founder. Dhodapkar:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Lava Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other.

scholarly journals Multiple Myeloma Cells Induce Lipolysis in Adipocytes and Uptake Fatty Acids through Fatty Acid Transporter Proteins

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Cristina Panaroni ◽  
Keertik Fulzele ◽  
Tomoaki Mori ◽  
Chukwuamaka Onyewadume ◽  
Noopur S. Raje
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Metabolic Reprogramming ◽  
Glycerol Production ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myeloma Cells ◽  
Long Chain

Multiple myeloma (MM) originates in the bone marrow where adipocytes occupy 65% of the cellular volume in a typical myeloma patient. Cancer associated adipocytes support the initiation, progression, and survival of solid tumors via mechanisms including adipokine secretion, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells. Although MM cells are surrounded by abundant bone marrow adipocytes (BMAd), the nature of their interaction remains unclear. Recent studies have elucidated the role of BMAds in supporting the survival of MM cells, in part, through secreted adiponectin. Increased fatty acid (FA) metabolism may result in metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells impacting their growth and survival. Here, we hypothesize that MM cells extract FA from adipocytes for their growth. We first characterized mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from MGUS, smoldering MM (SMM), and newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients by flow cytometry analysis. MSCs showed significant increase in Pref1, leptin receptor and perilipin A, suggesting increased adipogenic commitment. MSCs from healthy donors (HD), MGUS, SMM, and NDMM patients were induced to differentiate into adipocytes and then co-cultured with human MM MM.1S cells. After 72 hr of co-culture, CyQUANT assay demonstrated significant increase in proliferation of MM.1S cells in the presence of BMAd from HD; this was further increased in the presence of BMAd from MGUS/SMM and NDMM. These data suggest that the BMAd support the growth of MM cells and this effect is more pronounced in patient derived BMAd. A PCR-array targeting lipid metabolism on BM fat aspirates showed significant deregulation of genes involved in FA synthesis and lipolysis. Taken together, our data suggest that BMAd in MM patients are altered to further support the aggressive expansion of MM cells. The proliferative-supportive role of adipocytes was further validated in co-culture of OP9 murine BM stromal preadipocytes with 5TGM1 murine MM cells. To study the bidirectional interaction of MM/ BMAd, mature OP9 adipocytes were co-cultured with 5TGM1 or human OPM2 MM cells for 24 hr. Intracellular lipid droplets were labelled with Deep Red LipidTox stain. The lipid droplet sizes were significantly decreased in the presence of both 5TGM1 and OPM2 cells compared to OP9 alone. The decrease in lipid size suggested that MM cells may induce lipolysis in adipocytes. Indeed, 24hr co-culture of 5TGM1 cells with OP9 mature adipocytes significantly increased lipolysis 3-fold as measured by glycerol secretion in conditioned media. Co-culture of OP9 adipocytes with other MM cell lines of human origin, MM.1S, INA6, KMS-12 PE, and OPM2 also significantly increased the glycerol production as much as 4-fold. Taken together these data indicate that MM cells induce lipolysis in adipocytes. In contrast, treatment of 5TGM1 cells with synthetic catecholamine isoproterenol did not induce lipolysis, or glycerol production, indicating lack of triglyceride storage. Next, we hypothesized that the free FAs released from adipocytes are taken up by MM cells for various biological processes. To test this, 5TGM1, MM.1S and OPM2 cells were incubated with BODIPY-C12 and BODIPY-C16, the BODIPY-fluorophore labelled 12-carbon and 16-carbon long chain FA. All MM cells showed saturated uptake of the FA within 10 minutes suggesting that MM cells have efficient FA transporters. To confirm this uptake, unstained 5TGM1, OPM2 and KMS12 PE cells were co-cultured with the LipidTox-labelled OP9 mature adipocytes. After 24 hours, flow cytometric analysis showed LipidTox signal in MM cells. These data demonstrate that FAs released by MM induced adipocyte lipolysis are taken up by MM cells. Long-chain FAs such as BODIPY-C12 and BODIPY-C16 are transported into cells through FA transporter protein (FATP) family of lipid transporters. We therefore analyzed patient samples which showed that CD138+ plasmacells and myeloma cells expressed high levels of FATP1 and FATP4 whereas, their expression was absent in lineage-sibling T-cells. Moreover, pretreatment with Lipofermata, a FATP inhibitor, was able to decrease the uptake of BODIPY-C12 and -C16 in 5TGM1 cells. Taken together, our data show that myeloma cells induce lipolysis in adipocytes and the released free FAs are then uptaken by myeloma cells through FATPs. Inhibiting myeloma cell induced lipolysis or uptake of FA through FATPs may be a potential anti-tumor strategy. Disclosures Fulzele: FORMA Therapeutics, Inc: Current Employment, Other: Shareholder of Forma Therapeutics. Raje:Amgen: Consultancy; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caribou: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Immuneel: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document