Financial Burden of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms on Patients: Results from the MPN Landmark Survey in the United States

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5561-5561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreekant V. Parasuraman ◽  
Ahmad B. Naim ◽  
Dilan C. Paranagama ◽  
Maureen Thyne ◽  
Sara Goldberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Work Hours ◽  
Annual Household Income ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: Myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Patients across all 3 MPNs experience marked disease burden in terms of symptoms and negative effects on quality of life (QoL), productivity, and activities of daily living (ADL). To improve the lives and health of patients with MPNs, it is also important to have a current understanding of these burdens from a financial standpoint. This analysis of MPN Landmark survey data examined the financial burden of patients who reported that their MPN affected their employment (ie, reduced work hours, discontinued employment, or went on medical disability) or experienced no such effects on their employment. Methods: Patients diagnosed with MF, PV, or ET were recruited to participate in a real-world retrospective study (MPN Landmark survey) in the US (fielded May - July 2014). Only respondents who were diagnosed before 2013 and were 16 to 65 years of age at the time of diagnosis were eligible for this analysis. Participants were asked if their MPN had an impact in terms of reduced work hours, discontinued employment, medical disability, or no impact; the first 3 categories were not mutually exclusive. Participants provided information on their annual household income in 2013 before taxes by selecting from the following categories: ≤$15,000, $15,001-$25,000, $25,001-$35,000, $35,001-$50,000, $50,001-$75,000, $75,001-$100,000, and >$100,000. The mid value of each range was used to calculate mean income levels within each subgroup evaluated. Results: A total of 813 patients completed the web-based Landmark survey and 369 eligible patients were included in this analysis (MF, 85; PV, 172; ET, 112). Median age among patients with ET was slightly lower than among patients with MF and PV at time of MPN diagnosis (ET, 48 years; MF, 56 years; PV, 53 years). The majority of respondents were women (MF, 62%; PV, 52%; ET, 75%). Almost all patients (99%) had health insurance, primarily group commercial insurance through an employer (MF, 46%; PV, 53%; ET, 57%) and Medicare (MF, 40%; PV, 34%; ET, 24%). Most patients had at least some college education (ie, some college, 4-year degree, or postgraduate degree): MF, 86%; PV, 90%; ET, 88%. The mean 2013 household income of patients with MF, PV, and ET were similar to each other ($79,800, $80,200, and $80,400, respectively) and slightly higher than the total 2013 US mean household income of $75,839. A notable proportion of patients in each MPN group reported that their disease led to reduced work hours, discontinued employment, and medical disability: MF, 38%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; PV, 33%, 28%, and 15%; ET, 28%, 21%, and 4%. Patient demographics, such as age and health insurance status, were similar among patients who reported MPN-associated effects on employment and patients who did not within each MPN. In each MPN group, the mean percentage household income loss in patients with reduced work hours, discontinued employment, and medical disability were: MF, 16%, 18%, and 28%, respectively; PV, 15%, 24%, and 17%; and ET, 0%, 24%, and 37%, compared with patients who did not experience any effects of their MPN on employment (Figure 1). Discontinued employment and medical disability tended to have a greater impact compared with reduced work hours across MPNs. Conclusion: Patients withMPNs may experience a considerable negative impact on their employment status, which in turn may be associated with reduced annual household income. Therefore, across all MPNs, forestalling or reversing discrete aspects of the diseases that negatively impact individual productivity is an important factor in the management of these chronic neoplasms. Disclosures Parasuraman: Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Naim:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paranagama:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thyne:Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Mascarenhas:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Kalobios: Research Funding. Mangan:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fazal:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Miller:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mesa:Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Impact of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms on Patients' Employment Status and Work Productivity in the United States: Results from the Living with MPN Patient Survey

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4256-4256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingbo Yu ◽  
Shreekant Parasuraman ◽  
Dilan Paranagama ◽  
Ahmad Naim ◽  
David Dubinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Employment Status ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Work Time ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET), report high symptom burden that may compromise activities of daily living and quality of life. Results from the MPN Landmark survey suggest that for gainfully employed patients, disease symptoms may impact work productivity or career opportunities. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of MPNs on employment status, work productivity, and daily activities of patients in the United States. Methods: Adult patients (18-70 years) diagnosed with MF, PV, or ET participated in an online survey conducted between April and July 2016. The survey asked about diagnosis, disease-related history, MPN-related symptoms, functional status, changes in employment status since diagnosis due to MPNs, and work productivity (assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Specific Health Problem Questionnaire, WPAI-SHP V2). Descriptive statistics were used to report MPN-related symptoms, employment changes, and WPAI scores for patients with MPNs who were employed at diagnosis and currently. Results: A total of 595 patients (MF, n=148; PV, n=284; ET, n=163) completed the survey, with 387 (65.0%) employed full- or part-time at diagnosis (MF, n=90; PV, n=178; ET, n=119). Among patients who were employed at diagnosis, mean (SD) age was 54.3 (10.5) years, 70.0% were female, and 47.8% had a bachelor's degree or higher. Mean (SD) duration of disease was 6.4 (6.6) years. After diagnosis, almost half of the patients (49.9%) experienced ≥1 change in employment resulting from their MPN, one-third (34.1%) had ≥2 different types of changes, and almost one-quarter (22.7%) had ≥3 different types of changes (Table). Almost one-third of patients (31.3%) reported 'leaving a job' due to their condition, which was also the most common employment change. The mean (SD) time from diagnosis to first job change due to MPN disease was 2.4 (5.2) years. Among those currently employed, the mean percentage of overall effects on work productivity due to MPNs were 29.3% for work impairment (MF, 28.4%; PV, 30.0%; ET, 28.6%), 25.7% for impairment while at work (presenteeism; MF, 22.1%; PV, 26.5%; ET, 26.4%), and 6.4% for work time missed (absenteeism; MF, 9.4%; PV, 6.6%; ET, 4.9%). The mean (SD) number of hours of work missed per week was 2.0 (4.9). The mean percentage of daily activity impairment was 31.6% (MF, 32.1%; PV, 32.0%; ET, 30.8%). The effects of MPNs on work productivity and daily activities are similar to those reported by patients with other significant chronic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (work time missed, 19.1%; impairment while working, 24.0%; activity impairment; 33.3%; Bansback N, et al. Rheumatology. 2012;51:375-84). Conclusion: MPNs have a substantial negative impact on patients' employment status and work productivity. Half of the employed patients with MPNs surveyed had a change in employment status (eg, leaving job, medical disability leave, early retirement) due to their disease. Moreover, currently employed patients reported a meaningful loss in work productivity due to their MPNs. Disclosures Yu: Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parasuraman:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paranagama:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Naim:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dubinski:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bai:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mesa:Novartis: Consultancy; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding.

Use of a New Rotary Powered Device for Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy Yields Excellent Specimens Quickly and Efficiently.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4544-4544
Author(s):  
Ronan T. Swords ◽  
Kevin R. Kelly ◽  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Stephen C. Cohen ◽  
Larry J. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsy ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspiration ◽  
Swine Model ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Specimen Quality ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Abstract 4544 Background The importance of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy in the evaluation of hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic disorders is well established. Recently, a new FDA-cleared battery powered bone marrow biopsy system was developed to allow operators access to the bone marrow space quickly and efficiently. Aims The first aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of core specimens using the new powered device compared to specimens obtained using the traditional manual technique in a swine model. The second aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device in patients presenting for outpatient hematology clinic visits. Materials and Methods For the pre-clinical evaluation of the device, three anesthetized pigs were used for the study. The powered device (OnControl, Vidacare Corporation, San Antonio, TX, USA) was comprised of a battery powered driver and needle set. The manual device used was a T-Handle Jamshidi bone marrow biopsy needle (Cardinal Health, Dublin, OH, USA). Core biopsy samples obtained were assessed for length and sample quality and then submitted for analysis to a pathologist blinded to the device used. The clinical evaluation of the device was conducted in accordance with practice guidelines and directions for use. Data collection included insertion success, time from insertion to removal, specimen quality, operator satisfaction with control/function of the device and overall operator satisfaction based on a scoring system (0-5; 0=totally unacceptable, 5=outstanding). Results Twenty six samples were collected from the swine model (19 samples using the powered device and 9 using the manual technique). No cellular artifact or thermal damage was reported in any of the samples obtained. The mean lengths for samples obtained using the powered and manual techniques were respectively 19.4mm±1.6mm and 18.6mm±5.3mm. For the clinical evaluation of the device, 16 patients were recruited from 2 centers. Mean insertion time was 11.25±3.39 seconds and mean time from needle contact with skin to needle removal was 38.5±13.94 seconds. No complications were reported. Five operators rated the overall use of the device as outstanding in 75% of cases. Conclusions In this study, the manual and powered samples were equivalent in specimen quality. The powered device however, captured longer biopsies when compared to the manual technique. In the patients evaluated, the device was easy to use as well as being safe and effective. The mean procedural time was significantly faster than previously reported with a manual technique. A randomized study of the powered device compared to the manual technique is underway. Disclosures: Swords: Vidacare Corporation: Research Funding. Kelly:Vidacare Corporation: Research Funding. Mahalingam:Vidacare Corporation: Research Funding. Cohen:Vidacare Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Miller:Vidacare Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Philbeck:Vidacare Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brenner:Vidacare Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giles:Vidacare Corporation: Research Funding.

Effect of the Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inducers, Rifampicin and Dexamethasone, on the Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Safety Profile of Bortezomib In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983
Author(s):  
Andrzej Hellmann ◽  
Simon A. Rule ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Ofer Shpilberg ◽  
Huaibao Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Proteasome Inhibition ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Cyp3a4 Inducer ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Abstract 3983 Background: Bortezomib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 2C19 enzymes. Effects of co-administration of rifampicin (a potent CYP3A4 inducer) and dexamethasone (weak CYP3A4 inducer) on the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and safety profiles of bortezomib were evaluated. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in this open-label, 2-stage, parallel-group study. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 3 cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 q3wk either alone or in combination with rifampicin 600 mg once-daily on d 4 to 10 of cycle 3 only. Stage 2 patients received bortezomib at same dose and schedule in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg once-daily on d 1 to 4 and d 9 to 12 of cycle 3 only. Patients could continue with bortezomib monotherapy for up to 10 cycles in case of clinical benefit. For PK/PD, blood samples were collected before and through 72 hours following bortezomib administration on d 11 of cycles 2 and 3. PK was the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints included PD (proteasome inhibition) and safety. Results: 61 patients were enrolled (39 MM, 22 NHL) in the study. 13 were treated with bortezomib + rifampicin, 18 with bortezomib + dexamethasone, and 30 with bortezomib only. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced the mean bortezomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by approximately 23% (118 vs 93 ng/mL) and the mean area under plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC72) by approximately 45% (223 vs 123 ng.h/mL). Co-administration of dexamethasone had no effect on mean AUC72 (179 vs 170 ng.h/mL). The mean bortezomib Cmax was 20% lower after co-administration of dexamethasone (140 vs 119 ng/mL); however this difference in Cmax was within the observed variability in Cmax during cycle 2 (CV=38%) and cycle 3 (CV=45%). Mean (SD) maximum percent proteasome inhibition (Emax) and area under percent proteasome inhibition-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUE72h) were comparable for bortezomib alone and in combination with rifampicin (Emax: 61.9 [4.56] vs. 62.3 [3.81] and AUE72h: 836 [323] vs. 777 [358]). Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the Emax (66.7 [4.27] vs. 61.8 [6.69]) or AUE72h (1329 [638] vs. 1157 [381]). Safety profiles were consistent with prior bortezomib experience in this population. Drug-related serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were reported in 7/30 (23%) and 8/30 (27%) in bortezomib-only, in 3/13 (23%) and 3/13 (23%) in bortezomib + rifampicin, and 3/18 (17%) and 5/18 (28%) in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Investigator-assessed responses (CR+PR) were observed in 13/17 MM and 6/13 NHL patients in bortezomib-only, in 6/9 MM and 3/4 NHL patients in bortezomib + rifampicin, and in 10/13 MM and 2/5 NHL patients in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Conclusions: Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the PK or PD profiles of bortezomib. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced bortezomib exposure (AUC) by approximately 45%. Patients receiving bortezomib concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inducers, such as rifampicin, should be monitored for reduction in clinical effect, while concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers, such as dexamethasone, is not expected to affect the bortezomib pharmacologic profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Rule:Johnson & Johson: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Walewski:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Investigators fee. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patel:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skee:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Girgis:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Louw:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Key Oncologics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Emergency Department Visits in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4209-4209
Author(s):  
Z John Lu ◽  
Mark D. Danese ◽  
Marc Halperin ◽  
Melissa Eisen ◽  
Robert Deuson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Secondary Diagnosis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Total Charges

Abstract Abstract 4209 Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by low platelet counts, spontaneous bruising, mucosal bleeding, and, more seriously, intracranial hemorrhage. The disease is associated with a high risk of complications, often requiring visits to emergency departments (ED), with possible subsequent hospitalization. To date, information about ED visits in ITP patients, including frequency, cost, hospitalization risk, and mortality risk, has not been well documented, although such data are critical to the understanding of the clinical and financial implications of poorly-controlled, chronic ITP. We used the 2007 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) to examine resource utilization, ED visits, and hospitalization charges in the US. Methods: The 2007 NEDS contains about 27 million ED records from over 970 hospitals in 27 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Partner States, representing a 20% stratified sample of US hospital-based ED visits. The database includes hospital and patient characteristics, diagnoses and procedures, disposition from ED including hospitalization and mortality, discharge diagnosis-related group (DRG) for subsequent hospitalizations, and total charges. Its large sample size enables analyses of relatively rare conditions such as ITP. All ED visits in the database were separated into two groups: visits with ITP as one of the diagnoses (ICD-9-CM diagnosis code of 287.31), and those without a diagnosis of ITP. Outcomes and resource use were separately evaluated in these two groups, as well as in several subgroups within the ITP group defined by age and whether the ITP diagnosis was the primary or a secondary diagnosis. Results: Approximately 8,348 (∼0.03%) of all ED visits in the 2007 NEDS database were in patients with ITP (28% as the primary diagnosis), of which nearly 60% were by female patients and 88% by adult patients (≥18 years old). Medicare or Medicaid was listed as the primary payer in 58% of the visits. Seventy-five percent of the ED visits in ITP patients led to hospitalizations, compared with less than 16% of ED visits in non-ITP patients (p < 0.0001). In ITP patients, 3% of the ED visits ended in death, compared with 0.6% in non-ITP patients (p < 0.0001). The mean total charges for ED visits in ITP patients were $1,650 compared with $1,495 for all others (p<0.0001). The average length of stay (LOS) during hospitalizations subsequent to ED visits was >1.5 days longer (6.5 vs. 5.0 days; p < 0.0001) for ITP patients. The mean total combined charges during the ED visit and resulting hospitalization were >60% higher ($47,000 vs. $29,000; p < 0.0001) for ITP patients. Subgroup analyses of ED visits in ITP patients by age showed that in the majority of visits by pediatric patients (<18 years old), ITP was identified as the primary diagnosis (61%) compared with only 24% among visits by adult patients. Furthermore, visits by adult ITP patients were less likely to result in routine discharge (18% vs. 50%), more likely to result in hospitalization (80% vs. 43%), and were associated with higher mortality compared with pediatric ITP patients (4% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). ED visits identified with ITP as the primary diagnosis were associated with a higher rate of subsequent hospitalizations (81% vs. 73%), but lower total charges and mortality ($1,490 vs. $1,710, and 2% vs. 4%) respectively, compared with those identified with ITP as a secondary diagnosis (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Conclusion: ED visits in ITP patients were associated with significantly worse outcomes, higher resource utilization, and greater total charges. For patients with ITP, younger age and a primary diagnosis of ITP were generally associated with better outcomes following ED visits. More robust and rigorous analyses controlling for patient and hospital heterogeneities will be conducted to confirm these findings. Disclosures: Lu: Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Danese:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Halperin:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Eisen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Deuson:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A Comparison of Socioeconomic Factors in Patients Continuing Warfarin Versus Those Transitioning to Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) for Venous Thromboembolic Disease or Atrial Fibrillation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1179-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan K. Schaefer ◽  
Suman L. Sood ◽  
Brian Haymart ◽  
Xiaokui Gu ◽  
Eva Kline-Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Zip Code

Abstract Introduction: The regulatory approval and growing clinical acceptance of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) has challenged warfarin as the mainstay of anticoagulation for the management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE: deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (Afib). As clinicians and patients choose from the expanded menu of oral anticoagulant options, it is unknown how socioeconomic variables like income, race, gender, health insurance, or marital status may influence which anticoagulant a patient utilizes. We sought to explore if patients who stayed on warfarin differed from those who changed to a DOAC, with regard to the aforementioned socioeconomic variables. Furthermore, we desired to assess how the clinical variable of INR management, as reflected by the percent of time in therapeutic range (TTR), compared between these two groups. Methods: The Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) is a multi-center collaborative registry of 6 active anticoagulation clinics across Michigan. Patients newly initiating warfarin for Afib or VTE between October 2009 and July 2016 were included. Enrollees who remained on warfarin in follow-up ("non-switchers") were compared to those that transitioned to a DOAC ("switchers") on the basis of demographics, TTR by linear interpolation, race, marital status, and insurance. Patients in each group were further analyzed in quartiles based on the median household income of their zip code of residence, derived from the 2014 U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Analyses were performed using Student's t-tests and Wilcoxon Rank-sum tests for continuous variables, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Results: 8,480 patients met the inclusion criteria, 54.4% with Afib, 45.6% with VTE, and 1.1% with both; out of this group, 675 (8%) switched from warfarin to a DOAC. There were no significant differences between switchers and non-switchers for age (mean 68.1±13.6 and 67.4±15.7, p=0.23), gender (53.9% vs. 51.5% male, p=0.23), percent TTR on warfarin (55.1% vs. 56.9%, p=0.056), or percent with commercial health insurance (33.9% vs. 34.4%, p=0.78) or uninsured (0.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.17). Patients were more likely to switch to DOAC therapy if they had Afib vs. VTE (10.9% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001). When comparing switchers to non-switchers, switchers were more often white race (88.8% vs. 81.5%, p<0.001), married/living with a partner (68.9% vs. 59.7%, p<0.001), and had Government Health Insurance (58.9% vs. 54.6%, p=0.032). As compared to non-switchers, switchers were less often African American (7% vs. 15.3%, p<0.001), and less often had insurance through a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) (6.9% vs. 10.2%, p=0.008). Non-switchers more often resided in a zip code with a lower median household income compared to switchers (p<0.001). Conclusion: While DOACs are often considered in patients who have difficulty maintaining a therapeutic INR, TTR was not predictive of changing from warfarin to a DOAC in this population. However, we found that SES factors, such as race, insurance status and income are associated with a patient's likelihood for switching to DOAC therapy vs. remaining on warfarin therapy. Further investigation into the reason for, and clinical impact of, these observed disparities in the care of our patients is needed. Table Table. Disclosures Sood: Bayer: Research Funding. Kline-Rogers:Janssen: Consultancy; ACP: Consultancy; AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Almany:Abbott: Research Funding; Kona: Consultancy; Trice Orthopedics: Consultancy; MiCardia: Consultancy; Biostar Ventures: Equity Ownership; Ablative Solutions: Equity Ownership; Boston Scientific: Research Funding. Kaatz:Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myer Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria. Froehlich:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fibromuscular Disease Society of America: Research Funding; Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barnes:Portolal: Consultancy; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Burden of Hospitalizations Due to Epstein-Barr Virus-Driven Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (EBV+PTLD) in Patients Who Failed First Line Rituximab or Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy Following Solid Organ Transplant (Post-SOT): A Retrospective Chart Review Study of German PTLD Registry

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Heiner Zimmermann ◽  
Hairong Xu ◽  
Arie Barlev ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Dhanalakshmi Thirumalai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Average Length ◽  
First Line ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Failure Index ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare and often aggressive disease in the setting of immunosuppression following solid organ transplant (post-SOT). About 50% of cases are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection of B cells, either due to reactivation of the virus after transplantation, or from primary EBV infection. Data remain very limited with respect to overall clinical and economic burden among EBV+PTLD patients (pts), particularly in the setting of pts who fail first line therapy. This retrospective chart review aimed to quantify the burden of hospitalization due to EBV+PTLD in post-SOT pts who failed first-line therapy in the real-world setting in Germany. Study Design and Methods: The German PTLD registry database was screened for pts with EBV+PTLD post-SOT who were refractory (failed to achieve complete [CR] or partial remission [PR]) to rituximab or rituximab plus chemotherapy (CT) or relapsed at any point after such therapy between 2000 to 2015. Pts with primary CNS PTLD were excluded. Pts without any outpatient visit or hospitalization record were excluded from the analysis (n of pts=1). Hospitalization data were reviewed by an experienced physician and adjudicated as PTLD relevant; details on diagnoses and procedures performed during hospitalization were collected from the first diagnosis of PTLD to the earliest of the following: death, loss to follow up or end of study period (Sep 1st, 2018). We estimated the mean number of hospitalizations, average length of inpatient stay per admission and the percentages of time spent in the hospital out of the total time following PTLD index date or treatment failure index date. The PTLD index date was defined as the first date of EBV+PTLD diagnosis; and the treatment failure index date was defined as the earliest date of pts who became refractory or relapsed to first-line therapy of rituximab or rituximab plus CT. Results: A total of 35 EBV+PTLD pts were analyzed. All had failed first line rituximab monotherapy. Median follow up time was 24.8 months from the PTLD index date. Median age at PTLD diagnosis was 47 years (range 18-75). Of these, 6 (17.1%) were polymorphic, 21 (60%) were diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 3 (8.6%) were Burkitt lymphoma, and 5 (14.3%) were other B-cell lymphoma. Among the 35 pts, 23 (65.7%) died: 12 from PTLD, 6 treatment-related, 1 from organ failure, and 4 from other causes. The vast majority of pts (29 out of 35) received CHOP-based CT following rituximab failure (2 other CT, 4 did not receive CT). All pts (100%) had at least one inpatient hospitalization after PTLD diagnosis and 16 (45.7%) pts had at least one ICU admission following PTLD index date. The mean number of PTLD hospitalizations following PTLD index date was 4 (SD 3.2, range 1-12) and the mean average length of stay per hospitalization was 23.8 days (SD 22.6, range 2-94). The mean proportion of time spent in the hospital out of total time at risk from PTLD index date was 20.5% (SD 27.6, range 0.1-100) with an average of 9.5% of time spent in the ICU setting during hospitalization stay (SD 22, range 0-99.5). The mean number of PTLD hospitalizations (n of pts=19) following first course CT failure index date was 2.1 (SD 1.9, range 0-7) and the mean average length of stay per hospitalization was 14.8 days (SD 8.6, range 6-31.6). The mean proportion of time spent in the hospital out of total time at risk from CT failure index date was 41.8% (SD 39.6, range 0-100) with an average of 26% time spent in the ICU setting (SD 39, range 0-100). Conclusions: This is the first study to quantify the hospitalization burden directly related to EBV+PTLD post-SOT in Germany. The results show that hospitalization burden in EBV+PTLD post-SOT pts failing first line rituximab monotherapy is substantial accounting for approximately 20% of patient's time after initial diagnosis of PTLD with around 10% spent in the ICU setting. This hospitalization burden is even higher and accounts for over 40% of time in pts after additional treatment failure to first CT with 26% spent in the ICU setting. Disclosures Zimmermann: Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel, accomodations expenses; Atara Biotherapeutics: Other: Travel, accomodations expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel, accomodations expenses. Xu:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barlev:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thirumalai:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment. Watson:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trappe:Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Congress related travel support; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress related travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Congress related travel support; Celgene: Other: Congress related travel support.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Tagraxofusp (SL-401) Alone and in Combination with Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2967-2967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aishwarya Krishnan ◽  
Maria Pagane ◽  
Mikhail Roshal ◽  
Erin McGovern ◽  
Zoe Stone-Molloy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Provision Of Services ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Impact

Background: The introduction of the JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib has resulted in significant benefits for patients with Myelofibrosis (MF) and Polycythemia Vera, including reduction of splenomegaly and improvement in symptom burden. However, Ruxolitinib has limited ability to alter the natural history and biology of disease in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). More importantly, patients often lose response to ruxolitinib or suffer disease progression despite therapy with ruxolitinib. These observations have prompted efforts to introduce novel therapeutic approaches and devise novel combinatorial treatment strategies to improve the outcomes of patients with MPNs. CD123 (interleukin-3 receptor-a; IL-3R-a) has been identified as a therapeutic target in several myeloid malignancies. CD123 is expressed in a variety of myeloid malignancies, including AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and CMML. Further, Tagraxofusp (ELZONRIS®, SL-401), a targeted therapy directed to CD123 comprised of recombinant IL-3 fused to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload, was recently FDA approved for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). In an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, Tagraxofusp has demonstrated single agent clinical activity, with a predictable and manageable safety profile, in patients with relapsed/refractory MF. Thus, Tagraxofusp appears to have activity in MF. However, the utility of Tagraxofusp in more advanced forms of MPN (such as accelerated phase MPN), as well as the utility of combination Ruxolitinib and Tagraxofusp, have not been evaluated to date. To address these questions, we first evaluated CD123 expression using flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood samples from patients with MF with progression to accelerated-phase (>10%) or blast-phase (>20%) disease. CD123 expression was generally noted to be higher than that observed in normal control samples, by mean florescence intensity (Figure 1A). We next sought to determine the effect of treatment with Tagraxofusp alone and in combination with Ruxolitinib in leukemia cell lines and primary patient samples. We performed cell viability assays using the JAK2V617F mutant cell line UKE1. We first determined the IC50 of Tagraxofusp in UKE1 cells (range 2.95-3.57nM). Using this data, we then tested the impact of the addition of Tagraxofusp to Ruxolitinib on UKE1 cell viability using a fixed concentration of Tagraxofusp (5nM). The IC50 of range of single agent Ruxolitinib was 44.42-70.93nM. However, the addition of Tagraxofusp to Ruxolitinib resulted in a decrease of the IC50 range to 11.72-21.6nM, indicating an effect of combination therapy (Figure 1B). We then determined the impact of Tagraxofusp both alone and in combination with Ruxolitinib using primary patient MPN peripheral blood mononuclear cells in methylcellulose. Patient characteristics are described in Table 1. In most samples, CD123 expression was confirmed. In all samples studied, Tagraxofusp was able to significantly reduce colony formation when compared to vehicle, at a dose range of 2.5nM to 20nM. Notably, this includes two samples (151, 455) from patients with accelerated-phase disease. As well, Tagraxofusp demonstrated activity across genotypes, including in cases with TP53 and ASXL1 mutations. A reduction in colony formation in samples treated with combination Ruxolitinib and Tagraxofusp beyond that observed with either agent alone was observed in several cases (Figure 1C). Conclusions: Current therapeutic options for patients with MF beyond Ruxolitinib are limited. This is particularly the case for patients with progression to accelerated and blast-phase MPN. Here, we demonstrate that CD123 expression is evident in many such cases. Further, therapeutic targeting of CD123 using Tagraxofusp either alone or in combination with Ruxolitinib has activity in primary patient samples, including those in accelerated-phase and with high molecular risk profiles. These data thus support further testing of Tagraxofusp in MPNs, and in advanced MPNs in particular. Disclosures Roshal: Auron Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Provision of services; Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services; Celgene: Other: Provision of Services. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Levine:Imago Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rampal:Constellation, Incyte, and Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Agios, Apexx, Blueprint Medicines, Celgene, Constellation, and Jazz: Consultancy.

Rapid Prospective Identification of Non-Germinal Center B Cell-Like (GCB) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients for Targeted Trials: Early Results From PYRAMID, A Phase 2 Randomized Study of R-CHOP ± Bortezomib In Newly Diagnosed Non-GCB DLBCL.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1792-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Doner ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Brian K. Ulrich ◽  
Stephen J. Noga ◽  
Naveed M. Chowhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pathology Samples

Abstract Abstract 1792 Background: With increasing knowledge of cancer pathogenesis and availability of target-specific novel agents, it is expected that therapy will be increasingly tailored to individual biology. This is particularly true in lymphoma because translational research has characterized the molecular basis of the clinical heterogeneity in major lymphoma types, and many new agents are in development. However, a major challenge for clinical studies of specific lymphoma patient subgroups is the real-time testing of patient material in a way that enables prospective targeted clinical trials. Here we describe early patient selection results from a phase 2 trial of newly diagnosed DLBCL that prospectively identifies and enrolls only patients with the non-GCB subtype for randomization to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) with or without the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (VELCADE®). The non-GCB subtype exhibits inferior outcome compared to the GCB subtype after therapy with either CHOP or R-CHOP. Both preclinical and clinical data suggest that inhibition by bortezomib of the nuclear factor-κB pathway, which is frequently activated in non-GCB tumors, specifically benefits these patients (Dunleavy K et al, Blood 2009). Methods: This multicenter phase 2 study is enrolling patients at academic centers (n=10), major hospitals (n=13), and community practices (n=32), providing insight that may be broadly informative with respect to both patient outcomes and future targeted trial design. Obstacles to non-GCB-specific patient selection in this setting include change in standard treatment practice for DLBCL, as well as the challenges of collecting a tumor sample, running the assay, and reporting the subtype in a timely manner. All clinical centers in this study have agreed to release diagnostic pathology blocks to a College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified pathology lab for centralized subtyping. The pathology samples are subject to non-GCB testing via a 3-marker immunohistochemistry panel (CD10, bcl-6, mum-1; Hans CP et al, Blood 2004), and the results are reported directly to the clinical site. Results: To date, 45 patients have provided consent and have been subtyped. The mean turnaround time from receipt of sample to reporting of subtype was 1.2 business days (range 1–2 business days). All pathology blocks have been returned to the clinical sites; the mean time elapsed was 4.6 business days (range 4–6 business days). Rapid return of these samples was cited by clinical centers as an important aspect of the study design. There is no indication that pathology block release and central laboratory subtyping has led to delays in patient treatment. Of the 42 patients with results available to date, 5 samples were inevaluable, primarily due to limited tumor cells in the biopsy. Of the 37 samples successfully subtyped, 22 were GCB (59.5%) and 15 were non-GCB (40.5%); this is generally consistent with the ∼50% prevalence of the non-GCB subtype reported in retrospective studies of DLBCL. Fourteen patients have been randomized to therapy. Conclusions: Updates to turnaround time, patient subtype frequency, and enrollment will be presented. These data indicate that many centers are interested in targeted trials that offer new and potentially tailored therapies for their DLBCL patients. These centers can overcome their reluctance to release diagnostic pathology samples and actively enroll patients to randomized studies of frontline therapy. Overall, these results suggest that with careful trial design and attention to key logistical issues, prospective enrichment of specific patient subtypes is feasible in lymphoma. The PYRAMID trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00931918) continues to enroll patients. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Flinn:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding. Noga:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ortho-Centicor: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Papish:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; MD Advantage: Consultancy; Genomic Health: Speakers Bureau. Reeves:Celgene: Equity Ownership. Parasuraman:Millennium: Employment, Equity Ownership. Corvez:Millennium: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mulligan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Leonard:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Epidemiology of Myeloproliferative Disorders in US - a Real World Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2834-2834
Author(s):  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Jyotsna Mehta ◽  
Hongwei Wang ◽  
Yanxin Wang ◽  
Usman Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Age Distribution ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Prevalence Estimates ◽  
The Us ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Estimate Prevalence ◽  
Adjusted Incidence

Abstract Abstract 2834 Background: Myelofibrosis (MF), Polycythemia Vera (PV) and Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) are 3 classic BCR ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. MF is comprised of both primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and those with an antecedent PV or ET (Post PV and Post ET MF, respectively). The term secondary MF (SMF) when used sometimes includes those with histologic myelofibrosis without an MPN (i.e. secondary to another myeloid neoplasm or autoimmune conditions) as well as MPN associated MF (PMF and Post PV/ET MF). Limited published epidemiology data is available on these disorders. Literature reports MF incidence in the range of 0.4–1.4 per 100000. The objective of this study was to estimate prevalence and incidence using 2 real world US health insurance claims databases. Method: The US IMPACT® (∼30M enrollees/year) and US MARKETSCAN (∼40M enrollees/year) were used to retrospectively identify unique patients with PMF, SMF, PV and ET between 1/1/08 and 12/31/10. These databases can track patients longitudinally over multiple years, are linked at the patient level by a unique identifier that is consistent across services, health plans, and time and shown to be representative of the US population. ICD9 CM codes were used to identify PMF, SMF, PV and ET. Any MF was defined as having a diagnosis of either PMF or SMF. Incident cohort was constructed by selecting patients who had their first MF (or PV or ET) in 2010 confirmed by absence of diagnosis 3 years prior. Prevalent cohort was constructed by identifying patients who had MF (or PV or ET) in a given year. From the MF cohort, post ET and post PV patients were identified as those who had any ET or PV diagnosis in the calendar year prior. Primary MF was defined as PMF diagnosis alone without prior PV or ET. Annual prevalence rates were calculated for each calendar year from 2008–10. Continuous enrollment was required during the time period being evaluated. Estimates were adjusted for age distribution from census data. Result: About 8.5M enrollees from IMPACT and 17M from MARKETSCAN each year were included in prevalence estimates. Mean age of MF patients was 61 years in IMPACT and 67 in MARKETSCAN. Age adjusted incidence estimates of MF were about 2.4 per 100000 per year using IMPACT database, 1.7 per 100000 per year from MARKETSCAN. There is a slight increase in MF prevalence over time: from 4.9 to 5.6 in IMPACT, 3.6 to 4.2 in MARKETSCAN. Among MF patients, about 35–40% had PMF, 10% were post-PV patients, 15% were post-ET patients and the remaining had MF arising from myelodysplastic syndrome (∼30%), lupus (∼2%) and other heme and solid tumors (∼3%). Mean age of PV patients was 55 and 36% were female in IMPACT database. In MARKETSCAN, mean age was 58 with 35% being female. Using IMPACT, annual age adjusted prevalence for PV was 57 cases per 100000. Estimates using MARKETSCAN varied from 45 to 48 cases per 100000. Age adjusted incidence of PV ranges from 22 to 27 cases per 100000 patients per year. Mean age of ET patients was 53 and 57 years in each database. In both, 67% of patients were female. Using US IMPACT, annual age adjusted prevalence for ET was 54 to 56 cases per 100000. Estimates using MARKETSCAN varied from 39 to 44 cases per 100000. Age adjusted incidence of ET ranges from 22 to 31 cases per 100000 patients per year. Conclusion: This is the first study utilizing two large national US claims databases to estimate prevalence of MPN disorders. In the US, MF prevalence ranges from 3.6–5.7 per 100,000 patients. Incidence estimates of MF range from 1.7–2.4 per 100,000 patients. PV prevalence estimates range from 45–57 cases and ET prevalence ranges from 39–57 cases per 100,000 patients. PV tends to affect more males while ET affects more female. These data provide compelling evidence to suggest that prevalence and burden of MPN associated MF is higher than has been reported in the past. Additional research using other national databases and/or study designs is needed to substantiate these findings. Disclosures: Mesa: Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; YM Bioscience: Research Funding. Mehta:Sanofi: Employment. Wang:Sanofi: Employment, Equity Ownership. Iqbal:Sanofi: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neumann:Sanofi-aventis: Employment. Zhang:Sanofi-aventis: Employment.

A Germline Variant in the TERT Gene Is a Novel Predisposition Allele Associated with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 707-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hinds ◽  
Kimberly E. Barnholt ◽  
James L. Zehnder ◽  
Amy K. Kiefer ◽  
Chuong B. Do ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Jak2 V617f ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Germline Variant ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Research Initiative ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 707 Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are disorders that result in unregulated overproduction of one or more myeloid blood cell types by the bone marrow. Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) comprise the three classic MPNs. The somatic JAK2 V617F mutation is present in 95% of PV patients, and 50–60% of ET and PMF patients. Past work has identified a germline haplotype in JAK2 associated with risk of developing a V617F-positive MPN (Kilpivaara et al; Olcaydu et al; Jones et al, Nat. Genet., 2009). Methods: We recruited a web-based participatory cohort of individuals with MPNs to better understand the genetic basis of these conditions. Participation in this MPN research initiative included free genotyping, and participants provided informed consent and responses to surveys online, under a protocol approved by the external AAHRPP-accredited IRB, Ethical & Independent Review Services. We enrolled and collected saliva samples from more than 700 participants with the following self-reported diagnoses: systemic mastocytosis (n=142), ET (n=145), PV (n=137), PMF (n=50), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n=108), and 97 with overlapping diagnoses (e.g. ET or PV with PMF). Participants were genotyped using a derivative of the Illumina HumanOmniExpress BeadChip with additional custom content, including probes for the JAK2 V617F variant. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of classic MPN diagnoses (at least one of ET, PV, or MF), using 407 cases from this MPN research initiative and 94,037 controls drawn from the broader 23andMe research participant community. Association was assessed by logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, and 5 principal components to model ancestry. Results: We replicated the known association between germline variation in JAK2 and classic MPNs (rs12340895: odds ratio=2.5, P=7.4 × 10−35). We also identified a novel genome-wide-significant association in TERT, or telomerase reverse transcriptase (rs2853677: odds ratio=1.6 per G allele, P=6.3 × 10−11). The association is consistent with an additive model on the logistic scale (odds ratio=2.6 for 2 versus 0 G alleles). Another variant in TERT, rs2736100, has previously been associated with several non-hematological cancers and with red blood cell count, and our lead SNP is in linkage disequilibrium with TERT variant rs2736100 (r2=0.54). While no other loci reached the threshold of genome-wide significance (P<5.0 × 10−8), we saw a suggestive association with a germline missense variant (F858L) in ATM, or ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene (rs1800056: odds ratio=2.6 per C allele, P=1.4 × 10−5). This variant has also been reported to be associated with breast cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The rs2853677 TERT variant was associated with each of ET, PV, and PMF, with similar effect sizes. It was not associated with JAK2 V617F mutation status within the MPN cohort (odds ratio=1.0, P=1.0), while the germline JAK2 variant was preferentially associated with V617F-positive MPNs (odds ratio=2.1, P=3.0 × 10−6). The high-risk allele of rs2853677 was also predictive of V617F status among 23andMe participants who had not been recruited into the MPN community (odds ratio=1.6, P=0.0012). These results suggest that while variation in TERT facilitates either acquisition or proliferation of V617F-positive myeloid cells, it also predisposes to MPNs through a V617F-independent mechanism. Conclusion: We have identified a germline variant in TERT which is a new predisposition allele for classic MPNs. These results demonstrate the potential for web-based recruitment methods to contribute to genetic research for uncommon diseases. Disclosures: Hinds: 23andMe: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Barnholt:23andMe, Inc.: Employment. Zehnder:23andMe, Inc.: Unpaid advisor and collaborator Other. Kiefer:23andMe, Inc.: Employment. Do:23andMe, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Eriksson:23andMe, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Mountain:23andMe, Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Francke:23andMe, Inc.: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding; Locus Development: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tung:23andMe, Inc.: Employment. Mesa:23andMe, Inc: Unpaid advisor and collaborator Other. Gotlib:23andMe, Inc.: Unpaid advisor and collaborator Other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document