Prospective Phase II Study of Prophylactic Azacitidine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1162-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Guillaume ◽  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
Reza Tabrizi ◽  
Cecile Borel ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Immune Response ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is presently the only curative option for many patients with AML or MDS, relapse remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality. Strategies are therefore developed to prevent relapse. Post-transplant immune intervention with administration of prophylactic or pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and/or chemotherapy maintenance using DNA-demethylating agents such as azacitidine (aza) is being investigated. The exact mechanism of action of aza remains obscure and might be due in part to tumor antigen upregulation or other gene induction by tumor cells causing an immune response. We enrolled, in a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01541280), patients (pts) with high risk AML or MDS and candidates for allo-HSCT transplantation to receive azacitidine (aza) and DLI post-transplant as prophylactic treatment with the primary objective to reduce the relapse rate at 2 years following allo-HSCT and secondary objectives to increase disease free survival at 2 years post-transplant, increase overall survival at 2 years, investigate feasibility and safety of maintenance strategy combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy and follow the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD. High risk AML was defined as AML in CR1 with unfavorable cytogenetics, AML in CR2 or greater remission, refractory AML or in relapse prior allogeneic transplantation. High risk MDS was defined as MDS with intermediate-2 group and higher risk group according to IPSS criteria. Aza was scheduled to begin between d+56 and d+112 post-transplant at the doses of 32 mg/m²/d sc for 5 days every 28 days for up to a total of 12 cycles if the pt had not acute GVHD >1 or severe infection. The first DLI was started following 3 cycles of aza and discontinuation of immunosuppressive prophylaxis, and if the pt had no clinical signs of GVHD, uncontrolled infection or a recent history of gr>2 acute GVHD. Two other DLI were scheduled every 8 weeks after the 5th and 7th cycle of aza. The doses of DLI 1, 2 and 3 were respectively 5x106, 1x107, 5x107 CD3+cells/kg for related donor, and 1x106, 5x106, 1x107 CD3+cells/kg for unrelated donor. Sixty-four patients were pre-included prior transplantation, 30 pts were subsequently included, 20 pts with AML and 10 pts with MDS, median age 58 y (22-70). The status at transplantation was: CR1 = 16 pts (53%), CR2 = 6 pts (20%), refractory = 5 pts (16%), upfront transplantation for MDS = 3 pts (10%). Cytogenetics was normal or intermediate for 15 pts and unfavorable for 15 pts (namely 8 pts with complex caryotype). Conditioning was myeloablative for 11 pts, reduced for 19 pts (including 2 sequential). Donors were unrelated volunteers in 18 pts (60%).The time between allografting and first aza cycle was 66 days (38-93). The median number of cycles of aza administered was 5 (1-12) with 10 pts (33%) completing the 12 cycles. Forty one DLI were injected in 17 pts: 5 pts received one DLI, 2 pts received 2 DLI, 8 pts received 3 DLI. Two additional pts received 4 and 5 DLI because of a mixed chimerism. The first DLI was given at a median of 142 d (129-221) post transplantation. Aza was well tolerated, but was discontinued in 20 pts: because of GVHD (n=11), relapse (n=5), GVHD/infection (1pt), sudden death due to heart failure (n=1), withdrawal of consent (n=2, one after 1 cycle and another after 5 cycles). Four months following transplantation, 24 (80%) demonstrated full donor chimerism (>95%) in CD3+ cells. Nine patients developed grade 1 to 3 acute GVHD (CI 29.8±9%), 6 who did not receive DLI and 3 following DLI (grade 1 n=2, grade 2 n=3, grade 3 n=4). No grade 4 acute GVHD was observed. Nine pts developed chronic GVHD (2 limited, 7 extensive), 3 who did not receive DLI, 6 following DLI. Twenty patients are alive. With a median follow-up from the allotransplant for those alive of 36 months (range 12 - 46 months), the survival at three years is 66%. Causes of death were infection (n=1), relapse (n=8), sudden death due to heart failure (n=1). The median time to relapse was 5 months (2.5-9) and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years 28.1±8.5%. These results confirm that aza is well tolerated as a prophylactic treatment to reduce the risk of post-transplantation relapse. The incidence of GVHD following aza + DLI was not overwhelming. Analysis of T cell population and immune response as well as comparison to matched-pair control are currently performed and will be presented. Disclosures Moreau: Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals A Phase II Study of Decitabine Followed By Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Patients with Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2107-2107
Author(s):  
Christopher R. D'Angelo ◽  
Aric C. Hall ◽  
Kyungmann Kim ◽  
Ryan J. Mattison ◽  
Walter L. Longo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with high-risk disease have a markedly increased risk of relapse and death following transplant (Armand et al, Blood, 2014). Those who remain disease-free are at risk of severe morbidity from graft-versus- host-disease (GvHD). These issues highlight the importance of improved allo-HSCT platforms designed to reduce relapse rate without increasing risk of GvHD. Decitabine has minimal non-hematologic toxicity and proven efficacy in myeloid diseases (Blum et al, PNAS, 2010). Use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide has demonstrated improved rates of GvHD following allo-HSCT using haplo-identical donors (Bashey et al, JCO, 2013). No studies have reported on outcomes in patients undergoing decitabine immediately prior to transplantation followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We hypothesized that the combination of decitabine induction prior to transplant and PTCy would be safe and result in improved disease control with low rates of GVHD, translating into improved survival in a high-risk transplant cohort. Methods In this single-arm, single institution trial, eligible patients received 10 days of IV decitabine at 20mg/m2 no sooner than 24 days and no later than 17 days prior to conditioning. Myeloablative conditioning included fludarabine (50mg/m2 day-5-2), busulfan (IV 3.2mg/kg/day -5-2), and 4 Gy total body irradiation on day -1. Patients above age 65 received a 25% busulfan dose reduction. Patients received a fully or partially matched related bone marrow graft on day 0. GvHD prophylaxis included 50mg/kg of IV cyclophosphamide on day +3-4. Patients with fully matched donors received only PTCy while those with partially matched donors also received mycophenolate mofetil through day +35 and tacrolimus through day +180. Results We enrolled 20 patients, fifteen patients with AML and 5 with MDS. The cohort had a median age of 64 (29-73) and was predominantly male (14/20, 70%). Eight (40%) patients scored as high risk by the HSCT comorbidity index. Eighteen patients (90%) had a high or very high-risk score by the refined disease risk index. All patients received decitabine and 18/20 (90%) underwent transplantation; 2 patients did not receive a transplant due to infectious complications. The majority of patients received a haplo-identical graft (13/18, 72%), and the remaining 5 received a matched related graft. Outcomes are reported in table 2 and figure 1. There were no engraftment failures. Five patients, 3 MDS and 2 AML, are long-term survivors with median follow-up over 3 years. One patient developed donor derived MDS and required a second transplant. Most transplanted patients (13/18, 72%) survived to day 100 with a median post-transplant survival of 138 days. There were 15 deaths on study with the majority due to underlying disease. Six patients (6/20, 30%) died of infectious complications or did not receive a transplant due to infection. Incidence of grade 3-4 acute GvHD was low among those surviving at least 40 days from transplant (3/17, 17%). There were also low rates of chronic GvHD among the 12 patients alive without ongoing GvHD at day 100 (2/12, 17%). Conclusions Decitabine induction followed by myeloablative conditioning in this high-risk population resulted in a high treatment related mortality of 40%. Still, outcomes fell into an expected range for high-risk myeloid disease in an elderly and comorbid population. Based on expected outcomes for high-risk patients from the literature (Armand et al, Blood, 2014), decitabine did not markedly improve overall survival outcomes, recognizing that no direct comparisons are available in our limited study population. Decitabine may increase the risk of peri-transplant infections by contributing to a cumulative immunologic insult combined with disease-related immunosuppression and transplant-related toxicity, highlighting the importance of strict vigilance for infections within this setting. Diligent monitoring may improve infectious outcomes as shown in the second half of the cohort; only two out of the latter 10 patients on protocol died of treatment related complications. There were no cases of engraftment failure. Rates of acute and chronic GvHD using a PTCy platform were low and support other studies reporting this benefit. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Outpatient Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Children and Adolescents

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4389-4389
Author(s):  
Oscar Gonzalez-Llano ◽  
Elias Eugenio Gonzalez-Lopez ◽  
Ana Carolina Ramirez-Cazares ◽  
Edson Rene Marcos-Ramirez ◽  
Guillermo J. Ruiz-Arguelles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Patients with high-risk hematological malignancies have a poor prognosis without a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. An HLA- haploidentical donor is available in 95% of the cases, and post-transplant cyclophosphamide permits the use of T-cell replete grafts in settings were ex-vivo manipulation is not available. The experience with HLA-haploidentical HSCT with PBSC and post-tranplant Cy in the pediatric and adolescent population is limited; we report the following experience. We retrospectively collected data on 25 patients (0 to 21 years old) with hematological malignancies, who underwent ambulatory haploidentical HSCT with post-transplant Cy from November 2011 to November 2014. The different conditioning regimens are described in Table 1. All patients received high-dose Cy(50mg/kg) on days +3 and +4. Cyclosporine A (CYA; 6mg/kg/d per os) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 15mg/kg two times daily per os) were started on day +5. MMF was discontinued on day +35 and tapering of cyclosporin started day +90 in the absence of GVHD. All patients received anti-microbial prophylaxis for bacteria, fungal, herpes infection and Pneumocystis jiroveci according to institutional practices. First chimerism was performed at day +30, and second chimerism at day +100. Primary graft failure was defined when neutrophil counts did not exceed 0.5 x 109/L by day +30. Acute and chronic GVHD were graded according to NIH criteria. Patient, donor and stem-cell harvest characteristics are described in Table 1. All patients had high risk hematological malignancies. There were 5 patients who underwent their first transplant on 1st CR, 4 with ALL with high risk cytogenetics and 1 with AML. All other patients were defined as high risk because they were refractory/relapsed. Twenty-three patients (92%) had neutrophil engraftment after a median 17 (7-24) days. Platelet engraftment was observed in 20 (80%) patients after a median of 14.5 (11-23) days, 3 (12%) patients did not have platelet counts below 20,000/mcL. One patient was catalogued as a primary failure for not achieving neutrophil and platelet engraftment by day +30. One patient died before engraftment at day +10 of septic shock. Four patients (16%) died before day +30. The only patient that did not have a complete chimerism, had a diagnosis of AML and 30% of donor cells by day +30, by day +45 relapse of disease was documented. After a median follow-up of 157 days, 13 patients (52%) remain alive, with an estimated 1-year OS of 52% (95%CI: 30.4 - 65.6%).Nine patients (36%) died of complications (mainly infectious) not related to relapse at a median time of 66 days (10-579 days) from stem cell infusion. Nine patients (36%) relapsed in a median time of 105 days (45-288 days); three of those patients died at days +150, +113 and + 370 from transplant. Estimated 1 year event-free survival is 40.2% (95%CI: 41.3 - 75.8%) (Figures 1 and 2). Patients transplanted on 1st CR had a median follow-up of 664 days with an OS and EFS of 80% (4 patients), which was statistically different from the rest of the population (p=0.03) (Figure 3). Among those who engrafted (n=21), 9 cases (42.9%) had grade 2-4 acute GVHD and 4 cases (19%) of grade 3-4 acute GVHD. Three patients (14.3%) developed chronic GVHD, two had mild skin or liver cGVHD. One patient had severe (NIH stage 3) skin cGVHD, she was alive and with a grade 2 cGVHD until last follow up at day +893. Outpatient procedure, HLA-haploidentical HSCT including PBSC as a stem cell source, and post-transplant T-cell in vivo depletion using high-dose cyclophosphamide is feasible in children and adolescents, with acceptable rates of response and GVHD. Table 1. Patient, donor and harvest characteristics Variable N=25 Age, median(range in years) 10 (1-21) Gender, n(%) Male Female 17 (68%) 8 (32%) Diagnosis, n(%) ALL-B ALL-T AML CML 16 (64%) 2 (8%) 5 (20%) 2 (8%) Time from diagnosis to transplant (months) 17.2 (1.9-153.5) Conditioning regimen, n(%) Cy 1500mg/m2 + Flu 75mg/m2 + Bu 9.6mg/kg (IV) Cy 1050mg/m2 + Flu 75mg/m2 + Bu 12 mg/kg (oral) Cy/VP-16/RT Cy/Flu/Mel 16 (64%) 6 (24%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) Donor, n(%) Mother Father Sister 20 (80%) 3 (12%) 2 (8%) Donor age, median(range in years) 38 (17-49) Infused CD34+ x 106/kg, median(range) 11 (3.2-20) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) for Hematologic Malignancy from 10/10 Matched Unrelated Donors (MUD) with a Myeloablative Once Daily IV Fludarabine (Flu)/Busulfan Based Regimen (FLUBUP) with Thymoglobulin: Outcomes According to Stem Cell Source.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3140-3140
Author(s):  
James A. Russell ◽  
M. Ahsan Chaudhry ◽  
Michelle Geddes ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Mary Lynn Savoie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract Since 1999 we have used FLUBUP for all patients (pts) with hematologic malignancy including those who might be considered candidates for nonmyelablative SCT. Eighty-four pts were transplanted with marrow (BMT) or blood (BCT) from unrelated donors matched for HLA-A, -B, C, DR and DQ between 05/99 and 07/05. Chemotherapy comprised Flu 50mg/m2 on days -6 to -2 and IV Bu (Busulfex, PDL Pharma) 3.2 mg/kg daily days -5 to -2 inclusive. Thirty-four pts had additional TBI 200cGy x 2 on day -1 or 0. Prophylaxis for GVHD was cyclosporine A, methotrexate with folinic acid and Thymoglobulin (Genzyme) 4.5 mg/kg in divided doses over 3 consecutive days pretransplant finishing day (D) 0. Follow-up of survivors was 12–82 months (median 33). Two BMT pts were unevaluable for engraftment (died before D28), one relapsed before AGC engraftment and 2 had graft failure (GF). Two additional pts died of relapse and one of transplant-related causes without platelet engraftment. Granulocytes engrafted in all BCT recipients, 2 died before D28 and 2 later of relapse without platelet engraftment. Details of Recipients, SCT and Outcomes BMT BCT Number 49 35 Patient age median (range) 40 (16–60) 41 (19–61) ns Donor age median (range) 32 (19–51) 29 (20–57) ns Low risk (Acute leukemia (AL) CR1/2, CML CP1) 23 (47%) (AML 8 CR1, 4 CR2, ALL 5 CR1, 1 CR2, 5 CML CP1) 22 (62%) (AML 10 CR1, 8 CR2, ALL 2 CR1, 3 CR 2, AUL 1 CR1) ns High risk 26 (53%) ( 11 active AL, 2 CML AP, 3 CLL, 1 CMML, 4 MDS, 1 MF, 3 NHL) 13 (38%) (5 active AL, 1 CML AP, 1 MM/MDS, 2 MDS,1 MF, 1 HD/CLL, 1 HD, 1 CLL) ns CMV+ve Recipient or Donor D 35 (71%) 23 (66%) ns Female to male SCT 13 (27%) 3 (9%) 0.05 Male pt 29 (59%) 18 (51%) ns TBI (not TRM risk factor) 11 (22%) 23 (66%) 0.0001 CD34+ cell dose x 10e6/kg median (range) 2.7 (0.44–18.32) 7.47 (1.36–23.87) <0.0001 Median AGC recovery (D) (range) 19 (13–113) 15 (10–46) <0.0001 Median platelet recovery (D) (range) 28 (15–120) 18 (5–67) <0.0001 Acute GVHD II–IV 19±2% 21±7% ns Acute GVHD III–IV 9±4% 12±6% ns Chronic GVHD 77±8% 53±10% ns Low risk TRM (3 years) 22±9% 0 0.03 High risk TRM 43±12% 39±14% ns Primary cause of non-relapse death <D100 PTLD (1), sudden death cause unknown (1), HUS (1), aspiration pneumonia (1) Pneumonia (1), multiorgan failure (2), PTLD (1) Primary cause of non-relapse death >D100 GVHD related (5), primary GF (2), infection (2) Secondary GF (1) Low risk survival 70±10% 81±9% ns High risk survival 33±10% 54±14% ns In low-risk pts FLUBUP appears to be relatively well-tolerated and TRM is lower after BCT. Infection and PTLD contribute as much as GVHD to TRM so there may be little to gain by changing ATG dose or timing. Engraftment is faster after BCT as expected but there is no difference in acute or chronic GVHD. In general therefore, BCT seems preferable to BMT for MUD SCT with this protocol.

scholarly journals Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of the Prospective Randomized HOVON-96 Trial in Recipients of Matched Related and Unrelated Donors

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis N. De Jong ◽  
Ellen Meijer ◽  
Katerina Bakunina ◽  
Erfan Nur ◽  
Marinus van Marwijk Kooij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Skin Involvement ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Transplant

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been established as a powerful treatment modality for patients with hematological malignancies. The graft-versus-leukemia effect, however, is strongly associated with the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and subsequent transplant-related mortality (TRM). Several strategies are applied in order to prevent GVHD following T-cell replete alloHSCT including conventional immunosuppression (CIS) with post-transplant administration of cyclosporine A (CyA) and mycophenolic acid (MA), or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) either or not combined with CIS. Studies in haplo- and HLA matched donor transplantation have shown that PT-Cy is well tolerated and associated with low rates of severe GVHD and TRM. However, evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy of PT-Cy as compared to CIS in the setting of HLA matched alloHSCT is scarce. Aims In the present prospective randomized, multicenter, phase III trial we set out to compare a PT-Cy based immunosuppressive regimen with CIS and address the question whether PT-Cy would be associated with improved GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Endpoints included time to acute and chronic GVHD, progression free survival (PFS), GRFS, overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Methods Hematological patients (pts) with a matched related donor or at least an 8 out of 8 matched unrelated donor were included. Pts randomized for the CIS regimen received CyA twice daily until day +120 followed by tapering until day +180 and MA 16 mg/kg twice daily with a maximum dose of 2160 mg a day until day 84 post-transplant. Pts randomized for PT-Cy received 50 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide on day +3 and +4 combined with CyA from day +5 until day +70. Results A total of 160 pts was randomized 1:2 between CIS and PT-Cy, of whom 94% proceeded to transplant (52 versus 99 pts). Median age was 58 years (range: 20-70), 66% were male. Two pts received myeloablative conditioning. The donor type was matched related in 31% and matched unrelated in 69% of pts. Transplants were derived from peripheral blood in 97% of pts and consisted of median 6.14x106/kg CD34+ cells/kg (range: 1.36-19.4) and median 230x106/kg CD3+ T cells (range: 0-519). Baseline patient and transplantation characteristics were equally distributed between the two treatment arms. The cumulative incidence (CI) at six months of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 48% in recipients of CIS versus 32% following PT-Cy (SHR 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87, p=0.014), and grade III-IV 12% versus 6%. In recipients of PT-Cy, acute GVHD was generally limited to stage 1 skin involvement, whereas more severe skin involvement and bowel involvement were observed following CIS. The two-year CI of chronic extensive GVHD was 50% in recipients of CIS versus 19% following PT-Cy (SHR 0.38, 95%CI 0.21-0.67, p=0.001). The three-year estimate of PFS was 60% (44%-73%) and 58% (46%-67%). The three-year CI of progression/relapse was 26% in the CIS arm versus 32% in the PT-Cy arm. The three-year estimate of OS was 69% (53%-80%) and 63% (52%-73%). The one-year estimate (95% confidence interval) of GRFS was 22% (12%-34%) and 45% (35%-55%), respectively. Conclusion Use of high-dose PT-Cy results in a significant reduction in severe acute and chronic GVHD without affecting relapse, thereby resulting in improved GRFS. Hence, a more intensified immunosuppression regimen with PT-Cy might be preferred as GVHD prophylaxis in the setting of RIC alloHSCT. Figure Disclosures Nur: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Maertens:Cidara: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Gilead Sciences: Other: Grants, personal fees and non-financial support; Amplyx: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Merck: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Pfizer: Other: Grant and personal fees; Astellas Pharma: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; F2G: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support. Deeren:Alexion, Amgen, Janssen, Roche, Sunesis, Takeda, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion after Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5863-5863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemence Roux ◽  
Samia Harbi ◽  
Raynier Devillier ◽  
Faezeh Legrand ◽  
Sabine Fürst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis

Abstract Background Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is a curative option to treat hematologic malignancies, disease recurrence remains a concern in the setting of high risk diseases. Thus, post alloSCT therapeutic strategies are needed to treat and/or prevent disease progression. In this setting, donor lymphocytes infusion (DLI) is an option as post alloSCT immunotherapy aiming to enhance graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect. Although DLI may induce persistent remission, graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a potential complication following DLI. Because of the suspected higher incidence of GVHD in the presence of HLA mismatches, few series focused on DLI following haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT) so far. We therefore report our experience of DLI following HaploSCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) platform. Methods: We included in this single center study all consecutive adult patients with hematological malignancies who received DLI after HaploSCT with PT-Cy as part of GVHD prophylaxis from 2013 to 2016 (n=21). Conditioning regimens were non-myeloablative (low dose TBI-based) or with reduced toxicity (various dose of busulfan according to disease and patient characteristics). Ciclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil were given as additional GVHD prophylaxis in all cases. DLI were given at escalating doses, expressed as CD3+cells/kg, without GVHD prophylaxis, and ranged from 1x105 to 5x107 cells/kg. Results: Eleven patients (52%) were transplanted for high risk disease according to the disease risk index (DRI, Armand et al., blood 2015). Twelve patients (57 %) received haploSCT in complete remission,.18 patients received first transplant and 3 patients their second transplant. After HaploSCT, 21 patients (median age: 56 years [range: 23-73]) received either therapeutic (treatment of hematological post transplantation relapse, n=6) or prophylactic (n=15) DLI. The median interval from HaploSCT to the first DLI was 128 days (range: 79-1011). The average number of DLI per patient was 1.8 (range, 1-3). Clinical characteristics are outlined in Table 1. Patients with AML and MDS received DLI alone (n = 13) or in association with azacytidine (n = 2). Patients with MM received DLI in association with Revlimid (n=3). Chimerism before first DLI was complete in 19 patients. 6 patients (33%) developed post DLI GVHD in a median time of 42 days (range: 30-210) with exclusively chronic features. 2 patients (9 %) had severe forms of chronic GVHD. GVHD-related death occurred in 1 patient No response was achieved when DLI were given as therapeutic and 4 of 6 patients died from disease progression. Otherwise, only 3 of 16 patients who received prophylactic DLI experienced relapse. With a median follow up of 129 days, overall survival was 63%. Conclusion Our study suggests that DLI following HaploSCT with PT-Cy is feasible. GVHD is frequent but with a relatively low incidence of severe forms. No response rate was achieved in the context of hematological relapse, underlining that preemptive or prophylactic strategy might be preferred. Indeed, the overall good outcome in patients receiving prophylactic DLI is promising taking into account the poor prognostic of the diseases indicated for alternative donor transplantation. Further prospective studies are needed in specific disease settings to assess the benefit for using such post alloHSCT immune-intervention. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Time-Restricted Versus Standard Duration Immunosuppression after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Results from the Prospective Randomized Phase III HOVON-96 Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Cornelis N. De Jong ◽  
Ellen Meijer ◽  
Katerina Bakunina ◽  
Erfan Nur ◽  
Marinus van Marwijk Kooij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Grade Ii

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been established as a powerful treatment modality for patients with hematological malignancies. The graft-versus-leukemia effect, however, is strongly associated with the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and subsequent transplant-related mortality. The current standard Dutch regimen for prevention of GVHD in T-cell replete (TCR) alloHSCT following reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) consists of mycophenolic acid (MA) and cyclosporine A (CyA) for three and six months post-transplant, respectively. However, as approximately 30% of patients will never develop GVHD, immunosuppressive overtreatment is of concern and might impair outcome. Aims In the present prospective randomized, multicenter, phase III trial we set out to compare time-restricted immunosuppression versus a standard immunosuppressive regimen. The primary objective was to increase the proportion of patients with non-severe GVHD (either acute GVHD grades I-II without gut involvement or chronic GVHD not requiring systemic treatment) within 180 days after transplantation and to reduce the relapse rate, without increasing severe GVHD. Secondary endpoints included time to acute and chronic GVHD, progression-free survival (PFS), GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Methods Hematological patients planned to undergo TCR alloHSCT with a related or unrelated 8/8 HLA matched donor were included. The trial randomized patients between three treatment arms. The current analysis includes all patients randomized between arms A and B. Immunosuppression consisted of CyA twice daily aiming for serum trough levels of 250-350 µg/L and MA 16 mg/kg twice daily with a maximum dose of 2160 mg a day. The standard regimen (arm A) prescribed to discontinue MA at day 84 post-transplant and CyA was continued until day +120 followed by tapering until day +180. In those randomized for the time-restricted regimen (arm B) MA was discontinued at day 28 post-transplant and CyA was continued until day +84 followed by tapering. Results A total of 389 patients were randomized 1:1 between arms A and B, of whom 95% (184 in arm A versus 185 in arm B) proceeded to transplant. The median age was 55 (range: 18-71), 57% were male. Fifty-one patients received myeloablative conditioning and 318 (86%) patients RIC. Donors were matched siblings for 135 patients and matched unrelated donor (MUD) for 233 patients. The majority of patients received peripheral blood stem cells, consisting of median 6.46x106/kg CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0.94-26.3) and median 230x106/kg CD3+ T cells (range: 0-936). Baseline patient and transplantation characteristics were equally distributed between the treatment arms. The proportion of patients developing non-severe GVHD within 180 days post-alloHSCT was 24% in both treatment arms, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.67, p 0.98). The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at 6 months post-alloHSCT was not significantly different between the two arms (47% and 15% versus 52% and 18%), nor was the maximum grade or organ involvement of acute GVHD. In addition, no difference was seen in the two-year CI of chronic extensive GVHD between the two treatment arms (51% versus 49%). The three-year estimate of PFS was 51% (44-59%) versus 52% (44-59%), respectively. The three-year CI of progression/relapse was 28% in arm A versus 27% in arm B. OS at three years was 59% (0.51-0.66%) versus 57% (0.50-0.64%). The one-year estimate of the composite endpoint GRFS was 14% (9-19%) in arm A, and 17% (12-22%) in arm B. Incidences and nature of adverse events were comparable in both arms. Conclusion A time-restricted combination of MA and CyA did not increase the proportion of patients with non-severe GVHD within 180 days after transplantation and resulted in similar outcome as compared to standard immunosuppression following alloHSCT using sibling and well-matched unrelated donors. Given the observed high CI of acute grade II-IV and chronic extensive GVHD and low GRFS for both the time-restricted and standard regimen, recipients of TCR RIC alloHSCT should be considered for more intensive immunosuppression. Figure Disclosures Nur: Novartis: Consultancy. Deeren:Alexion, Amgen, Janssen, Roche, Sunesis, Takeda, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation for Children with High-Risk Leukemia In Chile: Report of the First 15 Cases.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4581-4581
Author(s):  
Julia I Palma ◽  
Lucia Salas ◽  
Flavio Carrion ◽  
Cristián Sotomayor ◽  
Paula Catalán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Viral Reactivation ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Engraftment Failure

Abstract Abstract 4581 The Chilean population is ethnically diverse, and more than 50% of the children referred for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation lack a suitable donor. To expand the donor pool we assessed the feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy of using a parental haploidentical (HI) donor and a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for patients with high-risk leukemia; this study was preceded by 2 years of technology transfer from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Between March 2006 and November 2009 fifteen patients (median age, 9.6 years) received T cell-depleted grafts at Calvo Mackenna Hospital, from peripheral stem cells mobilized with G-CSF from parental donors. N° aphaeresis/patient = one; 6/15 products required a second depletion, final Log of depletion= 3, 11 (5, 05-1, 64). Median cell doses were CD34+: 9.5 × 106 cells/kg (range, 2.13 – 20.0), CD3+: 1.0 ×105cells/kg (0.11 – 1.59), and CD56+: 67, 9 × 106cells/kg (7, 6–131, 8). 14/15 patients engrafted one1ry primary engraftment failure and in 2 cases a 2ry engraftment failure (CMV and Toxoplasmosis treatment). Eight remain alive and clinically well at a median follow up of 12.4 months post-transplant (7.2 – 52.2). Four patients died after bone marrow relapse, while only one died of transplant-related causes. Virus reactivation was the main post-transplant complication: 9/15 had positive CMV PCR but none had CMV disease. One patient developed acute GvHD > grade II and one had chronic GvHD. In this setting, HI transplantation offers a rational option for children who lack suitable stem cell donors. This information is especially relevant for populations that are poorly represented in international donor registries. On the other hand HISCT with RIC with ATG and TNI permits a good OS and EFS in this especially high risk population low TRM. This approach is associated with low incidence of GvHD and high viral reactivation incidence but no lethal infection even without CD3+ lymphocyte recovery due probably to pre-emptive treatment and fast NK cell recovery. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

T-Cell Depleted Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation For Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and High-Risk Cytogenetics Permits Long-Lasting Remissions In The Absence Of Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2115-2115
Author(s):  
Guenther Koehne ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Heather Landau ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Alex Lesokhin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract Introduction Pts with high-risk cytogenetics and/or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) post autologous transplant have a particularly limited prognosis. Conventional allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HSCT) has been associated with unacceptably high rates of mortality and non-myeloablative allo HSCT has resulted in high rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and progression. Methods We report results of a phase II clinical trial of 34 pts, using T-cell depleted allo HSCT (allo TCD HSCT) from HLA compatible (matched related = 12, matched unrelated = 13, and mismatched unrelated = 9) donors. All 34 pts had relapsed myeloma within 15 mos following auto HSCT, and 26/34 pts also had high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis [t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p by FISH and/or del13q by karyotyping]. All pts had to achieve at least a partial response from preceding salvage chemotherapy (n=26) or second salvage auto HSCT (n =8). Pts underwent allo TCD HSCT with busulfan (0.8mg/kg x 10 doses), melphalan (70mg/m2 x 2 days), fludarabine (25mg/m2 x 5 days) and rabbit ATG (2.5mg/kg x 2 days). T-cell depletion was performed by positive CD34 selection (Isolex) followed by rosetting with sheep erythrocytes for the initial 13pts (2008-09) and by CD34+ enrichment by the Miltenyi Device in 21pts thereafter, achieving < 104CD3+/kg for all grafts. None of these pts received immuno suppressive therapy post TCD HSCT. Pts with 10/10 HLA matched donors were also eligible to receive low doses of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) (5x10e5 – 1x10e6 CD3+/kg) no earlier than 5mos post allo HSCT. Results 34 pts with a median follow up of 31.6mos (range: 7.6 – 65.1 mos) of survivors are reported, median age 56 years (range 32 – 69). All pts engrafted promptly (median d+10, range d+9 to +12).TRM and acute GvHD (grade II-IV) at 12mos is 9% (95% CI: 2% – 23%) and 6% (95% CI: 1% – 17%). Chronic GvHD was not observed in any pt. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown in Table 1. Factors associated with worse outcome were disease status and number of previous treatments prior to TCD HSCT. (Table1; Figure 1) 15/34 pts are alive, 10/15 pts are in complete remission (CR), 4 pts are have been in continued CR for 44, 53, 62 and 65mos post allo TCD HSCT. 5/15 pts alive have progressed and 4/5 pts are currently responding to salvage chemotherapy and/or DLI. 14/19pts pts died of disease progression, 3/19 died of infectious complications and 2 pts died of complications associated with acute GvHD. Conclusion Long-lasting disease control can be achieved with TCD HSCT in pts with multiply relapsed MM including those with high-risk cytogenetics in the absence of chronic GvHD. TRM and acute GvHD are low in these heavily pretreated pts. Outcome of TCD HSCT is influenced by numbers of regimens administered and disease status prior to allo BMT. Pts who failed to respond to standard chemotherapeutics pretransplant responded to reuse of this therapy post TCD HSCT. Based on these results, we are aiming to perform TCD HSCT for pts with MM who have high-risk cytogenetics at an earlier time point before multiple relapses develop and to integrate post transplant immunotherapeutic or immunomodulatory strategies to further reduce risk of relapse in these high-risk pts. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide reduces the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantal Saberian ◽  
Noha Abdel-Wahab ◽  
Ala Abudayyeh ◽  
Hind Rafei ◽  
Jacinth Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Acute Myeloid

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) to reverse immune dysfunction. However, a major concern for the use of ICIs after alloHCT is the increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We analyzed the association between GVHD prophylaxis and frequency of GVHD in patients who had received ICI therapy after alloHCT.MethodsA retrospective study was performed in 21 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (n=16) or myelodysplastic syndromes (n=5) who were treated with antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (16 patients) or anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (5 patients) therapy for disease relapse after alloHCT. Associations between the type of GVHD prophylaxis and incidence of GVHD were analyzed.ResultsFour patients (19%) developed acute GVHD. The incidence of acute GVHD was associated only with the type of post-transplantation GVHD prophylaxis; none of the other variables included (stem cell source, donor type, age at alloHCT, conditioning regimen and prior history of GVHD) were associated with the frequency of acute GVHD. Twelve patients received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients who received PTCy had a significantly shorter median time to initiation of ICI therapy after alloHCT compared with patients who did not receive PTCy (median 5.1 months compared with 26.6 months). Despite early ICI therapy initiation, patients who received PTCy had a lower observed cumulative incidence of grades 2–4 acute GVHD compared with patients who did not receive PTCy (16% compared with 22%; p=0.7). After controlling for comorbidities and time from alloHCT to ICI therapy initiation, the analysis showed that PTCy was associated with a 90% reduced risk of acute GVHD (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.6, p=0.01).ConclusionsICI therapy for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes after alloHCT may be a safe and feasible option. PTCy appears to decrease the incidence of acute GVHD in this cohort of patients.

scholarly journals Acute and chronic graft versus host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant

JBMTCT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-66
Author(s):  
Vaneuza A. M. Funke ◽  
Maria Claudia Rodrigues Moreira ◽  
Afonso Celso Vigorito
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Graft versus host disease is one of the main complications of Hematopoietic stem cell, in­volving about 50% to 80% of the patients. Acute GVHD clinical manifestations and therapy is discussed, as well as new NIH criteria for the diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD. Therapy for both refractory chronic and acute GVHD is an important field of discussion once there is no superiority for the majority of the agents after primary therapy has failed. Hence, this review is meant to be a useful tool of consultation for clinicians who are dealing with this complex complication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document