Dexamethasone Accumulation in Dexamethasone Sensitive and Resistant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5140-5140
Author(s):  
Rosanna K Jackson ◽  
Ali Alhammer ◽  
Zach Dixon ◽  
Gareth J Veal ◽  
Julie Irving

Abstract Introduction: Glucocorticoids (GC) have been at the forefront of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment for a number of decades. However, there is heterogeneity of response, both in terms of GC-related toxicity and leukemia cell sensitivity. Contributing factors include marked pharmacokinetic variability observed in children (Yang et al. JCO, 2008; Jackson et al.AACR annual meeting abstract CT115, 2016) and a several hundred fold range of GC cellular response. Cellular resistance can be caused by deletion of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) but is more commonly downstream of the GR. One neglected upstream parameter relates to GC accumulation, which may be an important factor in ALL GC response, given the evidence for drug transporters in ALL cells. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether variation in intracellular dexamethasone (dex) levels is a determinant of dex sensitivity in an ALL setting. Methods: A number of cell lines including PreB697, GC resistant PreB697 sub-lines and REH cells, along with primagraft material from 9 patients and 6 primary patient samples (5 presentation and 1 relapse) were studied. The relative sensitivity of cells to dex was assessed using Alamar Blue drug sensitivity assay. Two methods were developed to assess intracellular dex accumulation; a liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) method and a flow cytometry method, using dex conjugated to the fluorochrome FITC analysed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometry machine. GR status of the cells was confirmed by western blotting. Results: Dex GI50 values (concentration giving 50% growth inhibition) ranged from 37nM in PreB697 cells to >1000nM in GC resistant sub-lines and REH cells. Dex GI50 values in patient ALL cells ranged from 2 to >1000nM. Dex resistant cells were defined as having a dex GI50 of >500nM. The mean GI50 of the dex sensitive cells was 3.8nM. Western blotting suggested wildtype GR status in all samples, with R3D11 and REH serving as hemizygous deleted and GR negative controls, respectively. The mean dex accumulation was measured in cells using an LC/MS assay developed from a fully validated assay measuring plasma dex concentrations (Jackson et al. NCRI annual meeting abstract BACR9, 2014). Dex was stable in RF10 media for at least 8 hours and there was no matrix effect of RF10 media on dex chromatograms compared to dex in plasma. An incubation concentration of 500nM was chosen as this is the observed median value of dex cell exposure clinically. Dex concentrations were quantifiable in cell numbers of 1 x 106after incubation with 500nM dex, allowing measurement of patient samples where limited numbers of cells are available. Dex accumulation in cell lines after incubation with 500nM dex for 4h was 2.1 and 1.8 pmol/million cells in PreB697 and dex resistant sub-lines, respectively (range for resistant subclones 1.2 - 2.1pmol/million cells). There was greater variability in patient cells with a 40-fold range seen, but dex accumulation was not significantly different between sensitive (mean, 1.0 pmol/million; range, 0.1-2.3) and resistant cells (1.4 pmol/million; range, 0.4-4.4) (unpaired students t-test, p=0.17). To assess intra-leukemia heterogeneity in terms of dex accumulation, a flow based assay was established using dex-FITC. Incubation conditions of 500nM dex-FITC at 37°C for 45 minutes were optimal. Dex-FITC accumulation did not differ significantly between sensitive and resistant cells; mean fluorescence intensity of 4.2 (range 1.5-5.9) versus 4.1 (range 2.0 - 9.1) in sensitive and resistant cells, respectively (p=0.97, unpaired students t test). Dex-FITC accumulation appeared uniform within the ALL samples examined. Conclusions: These data suggest that variations in dex accumulation are unlikely to play a role in dex resistance in ALL, at least in vitro. Advancement of the flow-based dex accumulation assay to include leukaemia-associated immunophenotype markers will allow measurement in dex-resistant MRD in vivo. Given that 35% of patients do not achieve plasma concentrations of 200nM dex (Jackson et al. AACR annual meeting abstract CT115, 2016), a combined approach incorporating pharmacokinetic assessments, drug accumulation and cellular response in ALL cells, may allow a comprehensive understanding of dex pharmacology in order to optimise its clinical utility. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 252-259
Author(s):  
Warren Fingrut ◽  
Wendy Davis ◽  
Eric McGinnis ◽  
Karen Dallas ◽  
Khaled Ramadan ◽  
...  

Salvage options for patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) include inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a recombinant, humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin. However, the benefit of InO in patients with dim CD22 expression remains unclear. We present a case of a patient with B-ALL who responded to InO despite only dim surface expression of CD22 by flow cytometry, achieving a survival benefit concordant with that reported in the literature and maintaining a good quality of life as a transfusion-independent outpatient. Our observation has broad relevance to clinicians who manage patients with B-ALL who are candidates for InO.


Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 3052-3062 ◽  
Author(s):  
FM Uckun ◽  
JR Downing ◽  
R Gunther ◽  
LM Chelstrom ◽  
D Finnegan ◽  
...  

Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice were injected intravenously with 5 x 10(6) primary bone marrow (BM) blasts from newly diagnosed patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcript positive t(1;19)(q23;p13) pre- B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A marked variation existed in the pattern and extent of leukemic cell engraftment in SCID mice challenged with t(1;19) pre-B ALL blasts. Blasts from some patients caused disseminated leukemia that was detected by histopathology and/or flow cytometry, whereas blasts from other patients produced occult leukemia that was only detected by flow cytometry and/or polymerase-chain reaction. Notably, the ability of primary t(1;19) pre-B ALL blasts to cause disseminated leukemia in SCID mice was associated with poor prognosis. Six of six patients whose blasts caused disseminated leukemia in SCID mice relapsed at a median of 7.8 months (range: 5.7 to 25.2 months). In contrast, the remaining four patients whose blasts did not engraft or only partially engrafted remain in complete remission at 28 to 47 months. A new E2A-PBX-1 fusion transcript positive t(1;19) pre- B ALL cell line (designated LC1;19) with the composite immunophenotype CD7-CD10+CD19+CD45-HLA-DR+C mu+ was established by expanding BM blasts from a SCID mouse, which died of human t(1;19) ALL at 7 weeks after inoculation of primary leukemic blasts from a t(1;19) ALL patient. This cell line caused disseminated and invariably fatal leukemia when greater than 10(4) cells were injected intravenously into SCID mice. Total body irradiation followed by syngeneic BM transplantation (BMT) showed limited efficacy against LC1;19 leukemia in SCID mice. To our knowledge, this study is the first to (1) examine the in vivo growth of primary t(1;19) pre-B ALL blasts in SCID mice and (2) show that leukemic blasts from a majority of newly diagnosed t(1;19) pre-B ALL patients cause disseminated human leukemia in SCID mice. Our results indicate that t(1;19) pre-B ALL is biologically heterogeneous with regard to its in vivo growth pattern in SCID mice, a feature that may be predictive of prognosis. The described LC1;19 SCID mouse model may prove particularly useful for designing more effective treatment strategies against poor-prognosis t(1;19) ALL.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Anna Płotka ◽  
Krzysztof Lewandowski

<b><i>Background:</i></b> <i>BCR/ABL1</i>-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a newly recognized high-risk subtype of ALL, characterized by the presence of genetic alterations activating kinase and cytokine receptor signaling. This subtype is associated with inferior outcomes, compared to other B-cell precursor ALL. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The recognition of <i>BCR/ABL1</i>-like ALL is challenging due to the complexity of underlying genetic alterations. Rearrangements of <i>CRLF2</i> are the most frequent alteration in <i>BCR/ABL1</i>-like ALL and can be identified by flow cytometry. The identification of <i>BCR/ABL1</i>-like ALL can be achieved with stepwise algorithms or broad-based testing. The main goal of the diagnostic analysis is to detect the underlying genetic alterations, which are critical for the diagnosis and targeted therapy. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> The aim of the manuscript is to review the available data on <i>BCR/ABL1</i>-like ALL characteristics, diagnostic algorithms, and novel, molecularly targeted therapeutic options.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document