scholarly journals Relapsed disease: off-the-shelf immunotherapies vs customized engineered products

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-173
Author(s):  
Reem Karmali

Abstract Innovations in immuno-oncology for lymphomas have outpaced therapeutic developments in any other cancer histology. In the 1990s, rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody, drastically changed treatment paradigms for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs). In parallel, the concept that T cells could be genetically reprogrammed and regulated to address tumor cell evasion was developed. Twenty years later, this concept has materialized—3 customized engineered CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) constructs have been embraced as third-line therapies and beyond for aggressive B-NHL. Responses with CARTs are durable in 30% to 40% of patients, with consistent results in older patients, primary refractory disease, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, and patients with concurrent secondary central nervous system disease, all features historically associated with poorer outcomes. Challenges associated with the administration of CARTs include cumbersome and time-consuming manufacturing processes, toxicities, and cost, not to mention a substantial risk of relapse. Fortunately, as our understanding of how to manipulate the immune system to achieve full antitumor potential has grown, so has the rapid development of off-the-shelf immunotherapies, with CD20/CD3 bispecific antibodies standing out above all others. These agents have shown promising activity in aggressive B-NHL and have the potential to circumvent some of the challenges encountered with customized engineered products. However, toxicities remain substantial, dosing schedules intensive, and experience limited with these agents. Novel customized and off-the-shelf therapeutics as well as rational combinations of these agents are underway. Ultimately, growing experience with both customized engineered and off-the-shelf immunotherapies will provide guidance on optimal methods of delivery and sequencing.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Drago

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in adults. Affecting nearly 7 out of every 100,000 people in the United States annually, this hematogenous neoplasm is known for its aggressiveness and rapid development. Being the most common NHL, it has been divided into several subgroups based on pathogenesis and treatment methods. In particular, subtypes such as germinal center, activated B-cell-like, and primary mediastinal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas  have been divided by their uniqueness of pathology at the cellular level. Knowing the numerous cytokines, inflammatory markers, and other microcellular processes that these lymphomas disrupt can help target an effective therapeutic at the disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (36) ◽  
pp. 4462-4469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Nicolas Mounier ◽  
Devinder Singh Gill ◽  
David C. Linch ◽  
...  

Purpose The standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The impact of maintenance rituximab after ASCT is not known. Patients and Methods In total, 477 patients with CD20+ DLBCL who were in their first relapse or refractory to initial therapy were randomly assigned to one of two salvage regimens. After three cycles of salvage chemotherapy, the responding patients received high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT. Then, 242 patients were randomly assigned to either rituximab every 2 months for 1 year or observation. Results After ASCT, 122 patients received rituximab, and 120 patients were observed only. The median follow-up time was 44 months. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rates after ASCT were 52% and 53% for the rituximab and observation groups, respectively (P = .7). Treatment with rituximab was associated with a 15% attributable risk of serious adverse events after day 100, with more deaths (six deaths v three deaths in the observation arm). Several factors affected EFS after ASCT (P < .05), including relapsed disease within 12 months (EFS: 46% v 56% for relapsed disease after 12 months), secondary age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (saaIPI) more than 1 (EFS: 37% v 61% for saaIPI < 1), and prior treatment with rituximab (EFS: 47% v 59% for no prior rituximab). A significant difference in EFS between women (63%) and men (46%) was also observed in the rituximab group. In the Cox model for maintenance, the saaIPI was a significant prognostic factor (P < .001), as was male sex (P = .01). Conclusion In relapsed DLBCL, we observed no difference between the control group and the rituximab maintenance group and do not recommend rituximab after ASCT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (11.5) ◽  
pp. 1327-1330
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Matasar

Despite a growing therapeutic arsenal to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), outcomes remain poor. Only approximately half of patients with this disease are eligible to receive curative autologous stem cell transplant, and of those, only half will be cured. Moreover, for patients who are transplant-ineligible, there are few effective options. Dr. Matthew J. Matasar discussed the current unmet needs in the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL, treatment strategies in the second- and third-line settings, and emerging therapeutic options.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Beatriz Rey Búa ◽  
Ana Jiménez Ubieto ◽  
Jose Javier Sanchez Blanco ◽  
Pau Abrisqueta ◽  
Antonio Gutierrez ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), non-candidates for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), have few treatment options. Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown increased antitumor activity in patients with DLBCL of different subtype from germinal center B-cell like (non-GCB). In the present phase II clinical trial (NCT02692248), we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of Ibrutinib with the R-GEMOX-D regimen (rituximab, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and dexamethasone), in patients with non- GCB DLBCL. METHODS We included patients with histological diagnosis of non-GCB DLBCL (according to Hans algorithm), with relapsed or refractory disease after at least 1 line of immunochemotherapy and non-candidates for ASCT. Patients received an induction treatment consisting of 6 (in case of complete remission [CR] after cycle 4) or 8 (in case of partial response [PR] or stable disease after cycle 4) cycles of R-GEMOX-D at standard doses every 2 weeks, in combination with ibrutinib (560 mg daily), followed by a maintenance treatment with ibrutinib for a maximum of 2 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles, and the secondary objectives were: CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Analyses were performed in the intention to treat population (data cut-off 10th April 2020). RESULTS Sixty-four patients (59.4% male) were included between March 2016 and November 2018. Median age was 67 (25-84) years. Patients had received a median of 2 previous lines of treatment; 56.3% were refractory (&lt;PR) to the last regimen, whereas 43.7% had relapsed disease after a previous CR. Eleven (17.2%) patients had received a previous ASCT. IPI at study entry was 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 in 9.4%, 67.2%, and 20.3% of patients, respectively (missing data in 2 patients). Of the 64 patients who started study treatment, 44 and 35 patients, respectively, were evaluated for response after 4th cycle and at the end of induction. Twenty-four (37%) patients started maintenance with ibrutinib, 7 of whom continue or have completed it. Causes of withdrawal from the trial (n=57) were progression (n=40), adverse event (n=6), transplantation (n=5), withdrawal of consent (n=3) and other causes (n=3). ORR and CR rate after 4th cycle were 53.2% and 35.9%, respectively. Patients with relapsed disease had significantly higher ORR (67.9% vs 41.7%, p=0.037) and CR rate (57.1% vs 19.4%, p=0.002) than patients with refractory disease. At the end of induction, ORR and CR rate were 35.9% and 29.7%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 1 to 39 months), the estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 21% and 25%, respectively (Figure 1A and 1B), being significantly better in patients with relapsed disease (Figure 1C and 1D). In the multivariate analysis, status of lymphoma at study entry significantly influenced PFS (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.82; p=0.009) and OS (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.94; p=0.0031) independently from the IPI and the number of previous treatment lines. The most frequent adverse events (AE) (present in at least 20% of patients) were thrombocytopenia (67.2%), diarrhea (51.6%), neutropenia (46.9%), anemia (37.5%), fatigue (34.4%), nausea (29.7%) and paresthesia (20.3%). The most frequent grade 3-5 AE (present in at least 10% of patients) were thrombocytopenia (46.9%), neutropenia (35.9%), diarrhea (15.6%) and anemia (14.1%). Three patients presented a grade 5 AE, two of them related (aspergillosis and pneumonia, respectively) and one unrelated (heart failure). CONCLUSIONS The combination of ibrutinib with R-GEMOX-D as salvage therapy for patients with non-GCB DLBCL is associated with high response rates, especially in relapsed patients. The vast majority of refractory patients progress very early, so this regimen could be considered as a bridge to other consolidation therapies. Biological studies analyzing cell of origin by gene expression profiling, minimal residual disease and mutational spectrum are in progress. Disclosures Abrisqueta: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Giné:Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Grande:Janssen: Research Funding. Caballero:Roche: Other: travel; Gilead: Other: travel; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel; BMS: Other: travel; Takeda: Other: travel; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin Garcia-Sancho:Roche, Celgene, Janssen, Servier, Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene, Eusa Pharma, Gilead, iQuone, Kyowa Kirin, Roche, Morphosys: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of a new combination in the context of a clinical trial. New combination (Ibrutinib + R-GEMOX)


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4537-4537
Author(s):  
Catherine Sebban ◽  
Hervé Ghesquieres ◽  
Corinne Carcel ◽  
Philippe Rey ◽  
Therese Gargi ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4537 Background Despite improvements in the outcome of malignant lymphoma, a great number of patients will ultimately died from their affection. The adequate timing for cessation of chemotherapy or immunotherapy is difficult to establish in these patients with chemosensitive tumours. Some palliative care performance index claimed that less than 10% of patients should receive chemotherapy the last 2 weeks of life. Patients and methods In order to collect epidemiologic data about “agressive therapy” in the endlife and in order to understand the decision making process, we performed a large scale study in an anticancer center and we reported here the preliminary data related to malignant lymphoma. Results From 1998 to 2008, 464 adult patients (pts) treated in one single institution by at least one chemotherapy regimen for malignant lymphoma died from the evolution of their disease, therapy-related complications or secondary neoplasia. Median age at death was 66 years, there were 286 male (62%), 407 B cell lymphoma (88%), 26 pts with T cell lymphoma (5%) and 31pts with Hodgkin disease (7%). Median time between diagnosis and death was 24 months. Forty four % of pts died inside the institution. The percentage of deaths due to primary failures in first line (progression or toxic deaths) was significantly decreased between 1998-2002 (30%) and 2003-2008 (20%) Clinical and pathologic characteristics were comparable between the two time periods. and the rate of patients treated in third line or more was not significantly different between the periods (49% vs 56%). Among the whole 464 pts, 172 (37%) received a chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimen the last 4 weeks of life and 107 (23%) the last two weeks. Median time between last regimen and death was 8 weeks. No evident predictive clinical factors has been found to understand the making decision process. The administration rates of chemotherapy the 4 weeks before death was 41% for the 1998-2002 time period versus 34% for the 2003-2008 period (p= 0.1). Among the 172 pts receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy the last 4 weeks, 58 pts (34%) were in first line of therapy and died from evolution or toxicity, 30 pts were in second line (17%), 27 pts were in third line (16%) and 58 pts in more than 3 lines (33%).Finally, we can estimate that 18% of the 464 patients who died had received a probably useless therapy the last 4 weeks. This rate is comparable between the 2 times periods: 17% versus 19%. Nine pts on 74 pts (12%) with B cell lymphoma received Rituximab the 4 last weeks in the first period since 29 pts on 73 B cell lymphoma (40%) received it in the second period. including 14 pts/73 in third line or more. Conclusions These preliminary data suggest an improvement of health care in the initial management of malignant lymphoma with less toxic death or progressive disease maybe related to best supportive care and to a generalized use of Rituximab in B cell lymphoma. Furthermore, only 18% of patients who died received the last four weeks a therapy which can be retrospectively regarded as irrelevant because it was administered without benefit in third line or more. Ethical and economical considerations will be addressed. Further data are needed in order to help physicians, patients and relatives to determine the optimal timing for cessation of “active therapy” and to consider the best palliative care setting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1719-1719
Author(s):  
Taylor K Mandeville ◽  
Cory Mavis ◽  
Juan Gu ◽  
Scott Olejniczak ◽  
Gyorgy Paragh ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Clinical outcomes of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T CD19) therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory Diffuse Large B Cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) must be improved, as patients undergoing CAR-T CD19 therapy can expect a cure rate of only 41% and a median survival of just 6.3 months if unresponsive. Of patients presenting with naïve DLBCL, 35% will advance to third-line treatment with CAR-T CD19 therapy. Poor clinical responses to CAR-T CD19 therapy and a small window of survival for unresponsive patients highlights the critical need for improvement of CAR-T CD19 therapy in the setting of r/r DLBCL. Overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein has been characterized in r/r DLBCL, and contributes to the disease's aggressive phenotype. Aberrant expression of the Bcl-2 protein proves targetable by an FDA-approved small molecule inhibitor which mimics the role of pro-apoptotic BH3 proteins, known as Venetoclax. Here, we investigate the effect of Venetoclax on CAR-T CD19 cell immunophenotype, effector function, and cytotoxicity upon co-culture with a lab-generated model of immortalized rituximab/chemo-resistant B cell lymphomas (Raji4RH) which recapitulate the resistant phenotype of r/r DLBCL seen in patients. Methods PBMCs were isolated and activated from apheresis samples from consenting adults (healthy donors) using the Miltenyi Biotec TransACT human CD3/CD28 Kit. Cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors encoding for 2nd generation CAR constructs 24 hours post-activation. Transduced cells were cultured in RPMI media supplemented with hIL-2 (1ng/mL) and hIL-7 (10ng/mL). At day 14, cells were cultured with Raji4RH and Venetoclax in either combined or solitary cultures. Co-culture cytotoxicity assays were performed by pre-labeling target cells with permeant dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific CellTrace Blue Proliferation Kit), then incubating with CAR-T CD19 cells (GFP labeled) at various effector:target ratios and Venetoclax concentrations for 24 hours. Sample wells were stained with viability dye and acquired on BD LSR II Cytometer. CAR-T CD19 cell immunophenotype was identified following 24-hour exposure of Venetoclax to CAR T cell populations at various concentrations. Following exposure, samples were stained with viability dye, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO, CD62L, CCR7, CD25, and CD95. Frequencies of T REG, T Central Memory, T naive, and T Stem Cell Memory populations were calculated. CAR-T CD19 cell effector function was elucidated by activating (24 hours), then exposing CAR-T CD19 cells to concentrations of Venetoclax for 24 hours. Brefeldin A was added to culture for the remaining 4 hours of incubation. Cells were collected and stained intracellularly for IFNγ, Perforin, and Granzyme B; and extracellularly for CD3, CD4, and CD8. Sample acquisition for effector function assay was performed on BD LSRII Cytometer. Results Concurrent in vitro CAR-T CD19 administration and Venetoclax exposure significantly increases Raji4RH cell death as opposed to single agent cohorts. CAR-T CD19 cell viability is unaffected by Venetoclax at concentrations which confer synergy, and a predominantly CD8+ population is favored. Finally, Venetoclax appears to significantly increase the frequency of T N/T SCM and T CM within exposed cultures, while affording a 21% decrease in T REG frequency. Additionally, the notable increase in T N/T SCM and T CM phenotypes following exposure to Venetoclax did not arise as a consequence of decreased cellular viability. Conclusion The combination of Venetoclax exposure and αCD19 CAR T cell administration demonstrates synergy when employed in the context of rituximab-resistant lymphoma cells, which may be explained by the effect of the BH3 mimetic's exposure on CAR-T CD19 cell immunophenotype. The ability to manipulate Bcl-2 protein expression within CAR-T CD19 cells affords insight into the role that the Bcl-2 family pathway plays within CAR-T CD19 cell biology. In addition to answering fundamental questions of CAR T cell biology, the combination of Venetoclax and CAR-T CD19 therapy may provide a solution to the observed clinical gap, in which CAR-T CD19 therapy alone cures less than half of all patients who advance to this third line treatment regimen. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Cheng-Hong Tsai ◽  
Feng Ming Tien ◽  
Hsin-An Hou ◽  
Jia-Hau Liu ◽  
Shang-Ju Wu ◽  
...  

Introduction Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B-cell malignancy worldwide. A sizable fraction of these patients ended up succumbing to this fatal disease, so the standard of care after the second-line chemotherapy and/or autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) remains to be improved. Polatuzumab vedotin-piiq (PoV), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug conjugate, gained accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in June, 2019. The phase II randomized controlled study (GO29365) showed PoV in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) conferred an additional 22% complete response rate for relapsed/refractory DLBCL, compared with BR alone (40% vs. 18%) . Interestingly, how PoV fares when combined with other salvage therapy remains as an open question. Method DLBCL patients who developed progressive diseases after at least 2 prior lines of therapy including R-CHOP and not previously treated with BR were enrolled into this study between Nov. 2018 and Apr. 2020 at the National Taiwan University Hospital. PoV was given at 1.8 mg/kg in combination with salvage chemotherapies based on clinicians' choices. The compassionate use of PoV was approved by the ethics committee, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study. According to the Hans' criteria of immunohistochemical subtypes, 13 patients were germinal center B cell-like (GCB), 17 were non-GCB, and 2 patients were unclassifiable. The median age was 62.5 years (range 20-82). At diagnosis, 26 (81%) patients had stage III or IV diseases, 22 (68.8%) had extranodal involvement, and 24 (75%) had the IPI scores equaled to 3 or higher. The median of failed prior lines of treatment was 4 (range 2-11), including 7 (21.9%) relapsing from ASCT and 16 (50%) were of primary refractory disease. Regarding combination therapies, 20 (62.5%) received BR, 5 (15.6%) had rituximab, 5 (15.6%) had rituximab/carmustine-containing regimens, and rituximab/gemcitabine-based ones were given to 4 (12.5%) patients. The median of cycles of PoV was 4 (range 1-7). Notably, the combinatory use of PoV and salvage chemotherapy helped transition 5 patients to ASCT and 4 to allogeneic SCT. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval 6.2-not estimable) with the median follow-up of 11.4 months (range 0.3-20.7). The overall response rate (ORR) was 45.2%, including 29.1% complete response (CR) and 16.1% partial response (PR). The patients achieving CR or PR after PoV had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not (median OS: not reached (NR) vs. 5.6 months, p=0.0001, Figure A). The ORR for patients failing prior 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 lines of treatment were 50% (3/6), 40% (2/5), 50% (4/8), and 42% (5/12), respectively. The patients failing prior 4 lines of treatment had better OS than those with failed prior 5 or more lines (NR vs. 6.47 months). Non-GCB patients had better ORR (69.2% vs. 30.8%) and OS (NR vs. 6.23 months) than GCB ones did. Intriguingly, the patients received SCT had better OS compared with the others (NR vs. 6.23 months, p=0.011, Figure B). As for grade 3 & 4 hematological adverse effects, 16 (50%) patients developed anemia, 20 (62.5%) had thrombocytopenia, and 18 (56.3%) were neutropenic. Grade 5 toxicities included pneumonia (2 patients, 6.3%), fungemia (1, 3.1%), intracranial hemorrhage (1, 3.1%), and other infections (2, 6.3%). Conclusion As the third-line or above treatment for DLBCL in this study, the efficacy and safety associated with PoV-based therapies not only were encouraging but also helped bridge to transplants. The application of this monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate in future clinical trials for DLBCL is expected. Figure Disclosures Tsai: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria; Harvester: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Kirin: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ko:Roche: Honoraria. Cheng:Roche: Honoraria. Huang:MundiPharma: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol Meyer & Squibb: Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e241067
Author(s):  
Pierre Englert ◽  
Sophie Levy ◽  
Marc Vekemans ◽  
Virginie De Wilde

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is an aggressive and rare type of diffuse extranodal B-cell lymphoma. Diagnosis and treatment are challenging and clinical presentation is variable. Physicians should be aware of this rare but life-threatening lymphoma without adenopathy and treatment should be promptly started. We describe the case of a 70-year-old woman who presented with general malaise, acute dyspnoea, platypnoea and lactic acidosis. Echocardiography revealed an extracardiac shunt, the cause of her orthodeoxia. The patient developed rapid liver failure and underwent liver biopsy. Anatomopathological findings suggested IVLBCL, non-germinal center type. She achieved complete remission after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methylprednisolone chemotherapy but relapsed 1 year after initial presentation with multiple organ involvement. The patient’s relapsed disease was treated with rituximab, iphosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide and she is still in complete remission 2 years later.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4940-4940
Author(s):  
Rebecca Elstrom ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Katya Ostrow ◽  
Jacqueline Barrientos ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse after or are refractory to initial therapy can in some cases experience long term disease free survival after second-line chemotherapy alone or followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. The major predictor of outcome for patients undergoing autologous transplant is response to prior (second-line) chemotherapy. Patients not responding to second-line regimens may receive third-line or subsequent chemotherapy regimens in hopes of achieving response and proceeding to transplant, but available outcome data from this group have been limited. Methods: We used pathology and treatment records to identify patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL (excluding transformed lymphoma) at the Weill Cornell Medical Center for whom data on response to second-line chemotherapy could be determined. An online social security database verified survival. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: One hundred eight patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who underwent second line chemotherapy were identified, and adequate treatment records were available for 74 of these patients. Chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide-containing regimens in 60 patients (81%), platinum-containing regimens in 61 (82%) and included rituximab in 29 (39%). Forty-seven patients (64%) achieved at least a partial response (R), while 27 patients (36%) did not respond (NR). Median OS from second therapy was 4 months (range 1–61) in the NR group, and was projected at 66 months (range 2–106) in the R group. Only one patient in the NR group (4%) survived for greater than one year. Twenty-four NR patients underwent third-line therapy, of whom 5 of 19 with available response data achieved a clinical response (5 died prior to response assessment) and 3 underwent autologous transplantation. Two patients progressed within 3 months of transplantation, with OS from transplantation of 4 months, while the third patient is alive in remission at 59 months after transplant. Neither longer duration of first remission (HR 1.00, p=0.85) nor choice of subsequent aggressive chemotherapy over less intensive approaches (HR 0.81, p=0.65) conferred a survival benefit in patients who had not responded to second-line therapy. Conclusion: Patients with recurrent DLBCL who do not respond to second-line chemotherapy have poor outcomes, with only rare patients achieving extended survival following subsequent chemotherapy. Clinical trials of novel therapeutic regimens should be prioritized as management strategies for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document