scholarly journals Functional ageing in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: the impact of frailty on adverse health outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 1900647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabina A. Guler ◽  
Joanne M. Kwan ◽  
Janice M. Leung ◽  
Nasreen Khalil ◽  
Pearce G. Wilcox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Adverse Health ◽  
Adverse Health Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundAccelerated biological and functional ageing is common in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, their impact on adverse health outcomes has not been evaluated in this population.MethodsPatients were prospectively recruited from a specialised ILD clinic. Functional ageing was determined by frailty index and biological age by measurement of absolute telomere length (aTL) from patients' peripheral blood leukocytes. Adverse health outcomes included health-related quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire), number and length of respiratory and non-respiratory hospitalisations, medication tolerability and time to death or lung transplantation. Multivariable models were used to determine the risks and rates of adverse health outcomes associated with the frailty index and aTL.Results540 patients with fibrotic ILD, including 100 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), provided 749 frailty index assessments, with 189 patients providing blood samples. The frailty index was strongly associated with quality of life, rate of hospitalisation, time to hospital discharge and mortality, including adjustment for age, sex, disease severity and IPF diagnosis. Mortality prognostication was improved by the addition of the frailty index to commonly used clinical parameters and previously validated composite indices. Conversely, aTL was not associated with most adverse health outcomes. The effect of chronological age on outcomes was mediated primarily by the frailty index, and to a lesser extent by aTL.ConclusionsFunctional ageing is associated with adverse health outcomes in patients with fibrotic ILD, indicating the need for consideration of the individual functional age into clinical decision-making.

Quality of life and later adverse health outcomes in patients with suspected heart attack

1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynette L-Y. Lim ◽  
Natalie A. Johnson ◽  
Rachel L. O'Connell ◽  
Richard F. Heller
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Heart Attack ◽  
Adverse Health ◽  
Adverse Health Outcomes

Quality of life in SSc-ILD patients: Understanding the impact of the ILD and the needs of the SSc-ILD patients and their need for caregivers in France

2021 ◽  
pp. 239719832110139
Author(s):  
Yannick Allanore ◽  
Joel Constans ◽  
Dominique Godard ◽  
Gerard de Pouvourville ◽  
Stephane Bouee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Forced Vital Capacity ◽  
Vital Capacity ◽  
Disease Score ◽  
System P ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the impact of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease, on quality of life, to estimate the correlation between quality of life and severity of lung disease and to assess the impact of interstitial lung disease on caregivers. Methods: Seven investigators included systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease patients from December 2019 to April 2020. Sociodemographics and clinical data were collected. Patients reported outcomes and questionnaires were used with 1 generic patients reported outcome (EQ-5D-5L), 1 specific PRO (Brief Interstitial Lung Disease) and 2 self-reported questionnaires on impact of SSc complications and impact on caregivers. The correlation between forced vital capacity and EQ-5D-5L score was estimated with a multivariate linear regression model adjusted on several covariates. Results: In all, 89 patients were included. 26.4% were males, mean age was 58.2 ± 14.5 years. Mean EQ-5D-5L score = 0.79 ± 0.22 (median = 0.85). Mean EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale score = 60.8 ± 20.4 (median = 61.5). Mean King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score = 58.4 ± 12.7 (median = 58.0). After adjustment on covariates, a significant correlation between forced vital capacity and EQ-5D-5L score was found with an increase of 0.003 of the EQ-5D-5L score for a 1% increase of FVC (p = 0.0096). No significant correlation between forced vital capacity and the EQ-VAS and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score were found. The impact of SSc on other organs was significantly correlated with EQ- 5D-5L score, respectively, for the impact scores on the lung system (p = 0.0003), heart system (p = 0.0182), Raynaud’s syndrome (p = 0.0015), digestive system (p = 0.0032), joints/muscles (p = 0.0003), skin (p < 0.0001), kidney (p = 0.0052) and gastro-oesophageal reflux (p = 0.0063). Significant correlations between King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score and lung system (p < 0.0001), heart system (p < 0.0001), digital ulcers (p = 0.058), digestive system (p < 0.0001), kidney (p = 0.0004), skin (p = 0.0499) and gastro-oesophageal reflux (p = 0.0033) scores were found 68.5% of patients reported their need for a caregiver to help them in their daily life activities. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the strong burden of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease` for patients, especially with an impact on quality of life, on other organs manifestations and need for caregivers in their daily life.

scholarly journals Understanding the influence of socioeconomic status on the association between combinations of lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e042212
Author(s):  
Hamish Foster ◽  
Peter Polz ◽  
Frances Mair ◽  
Jason Gill ◽  
Catherine A O'Donnell
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lifestyle Factors ◽  
Lifestyle Factor ◽  
Unhealthy Lifestyle ◽  
Adverse Health ◽  
Adverse Health Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionCombinations of unhealthy lifestyle factors are strongly associated with mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. It is unclear how socioeconomic status (SES) affects those associations. Lower SES groups may be disproportionately vulnerable to the effects of unhealthy lifestyle factors compared with higher SES groups via interactions with other factors associated with low SES (eg, stress) or via accelerated biological ageing. This systematic review aims to synthesise studies that examine how SES moderates the association between lifestyle factor combinations and adverse health outcomes. Greater understanding of how lifestyle risk varies across socioeconomic spectra could reduce adverse health by (1) identifying novel high-risk groups or targets for future interventions and (2) informing research, policy and interventions that aim to support healthy lifestyles in socioeconomically deprived communities.Methods and analysisThree databases will be searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) from inception to March 2020. Reference lists, citations and grey literature will also be searched. Inclusion criteria are: (1) prospective cohort studies; (2) investigations of two key exposures: (a) lifestyle factor combinations of at least three lifestyle factors (eg, smoking, physical activity and diet) and (b) SES (eg, income, education or poverty index); (3) an assessment of the impact of SES on the association between combinations of unhealthy lifestyle factors and health outcomes; (4) at least one outcome from—mortality (all cause, CVD and cancer), CVD or cancer incidence. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts of included studies. Data extraction will focus on cohort characteristics, exposures, direction and magnitude of SES effects, methods and quality (via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). If appropriate, a meta-analysis, pooling the effects of SES, will be performed. Alternatively, a synthesis without meta-analysis will be conducted.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, professional networks, social media and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020172588.

scholarly journals Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life Decline in Interstitial Lung Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillen Nozibuyiso Maqhuzu ◽  
Boglárka Lilla Szentes ◽  
Michael Kreuter ◽  
Thomas Bahmer ◽  
Nicolas Kahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Psychological Impact ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients is impaired. We aimed to identify baseline predictors for HRQL decline within a 12-month observation period. Methods: We analyzed 194 ILD patients from two German ILD-centers in the observational HILDA study. We employed the disease-specific King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) with the subdomains ‘psychological impact’, ‘chest symptoms’ and ‘breathlessness and activities’, and the generic EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS). We evaluated how many patients experienced a clinically meaningful decline in HRQL. Subsequently, we investigated medical and sociodemographic factors as potential predictors of HRQL deterioration. Results: Within the study population (34.0% male, Ø age 61.7) mean HRQL scores hardly changed between baseline and follow up (K-BILD: 52.8 vs. 52.5 | VAS: 60.0 vs. 57.3). On the intra-individual level, 30.4% (n = 59) experienced a clinically relevant deterioration in K-BILD total score and 35.4% (n = 68) in VAS. Lower baseline forced vital capacity % predicted determined HRQL decline in K-BILD total score (ß– coefficient -0.02, p = 0.007), VAS (ß–coefficient -0.03, p < 0.0001), and in the subdomain ‘psychological impact’ (ß– coefficient -0.02, p = 0.014). Lower baseline diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide % predicted determined deterioration in ‘breathlessness and activities’ (ß– coefficient -0.04, p = 0.003) and ‘chest symptoms’ (ß– coefficient -0.04, p = 0.002). Additionally, increasing age predicted decline in ‘psychological impact’ (ß–coefficient 0.06, p < 0.007). Conclusion: A third of ILD patients experience a clinically relevant HRQL deterioration within 12 months, which is mainly predicted by lung function baseline value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document