scholarly journals Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain and immobility-associated osteoarthritis: consensus guidance for primary care

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ade Adebajo
2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 285-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander JO Veldhuyzen van Zanten ◽  
Marc Bradette ◽  
Naoki Chiba ◽  
David Armstrong ◽  
Alan Barkun ◽  
...  

The present paper is an update to and extension of the previous systematic review on the primary care management of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia (UD). The original publication of the clinical management tool focused on the initial four- to eight-week assessment of UD. This update is based on new data from systematic reviews and clinical trials relevant to UD. There is now direct clinical evidence supporting a test-and-treat approach in patients with nondominant heartburn dyspepsia symptoms, and head-to-head comparisons show that use of a proton pump inhibitor is superior to the use of H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in the initial treatment of Helicobacter pylori-negative dyspepsia patients. Cisapride is no longer available as a treatment option and evidence for other prokinetic agents is lacking. In patients with long-standing heartburn-dominant (ie, gastroesophageal reflux disease) and nonheartburn-dominant dyspepsia, a once-in-a-lifetime endoscopy is recommended. Endoscopy should also be considered in patients with new-onset dyspepsia that develops after the age of 50 years. Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetylsalicylic acid and cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors can all cause dyspepsia. If their use cannot be discontinued, cotherapy with either a proton pump inhibitor, misoprostol or high-dose H2RAs is recommended, although the evidence is based on ulcer data and not dyspepsia data. In patients with nonheartburn-dominant dyspepsia, noninvasive testing for H pylori should be performed and treatment given if positive. When starting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for a prolonged course, testing and treatment with H2RAs are advised if patients have a history of previous ulcers or ulcer bleeding.


2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje Neubert ◽  
Katia Verhamme ◽  
Macey L. Murray ◽  
Gino Picelli ◽  
Yingfen Hsia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211983411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Min Jang ◽  
Ruixin Jiang ◽  
Darren Grabe ◽  
Amy Barton Pai

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used and have a potential for over-the-counter misuse. Limited health literacy is associated with poor health outcomes. Identification of new strategies to assess literacy and numeracy could be useful in targeting effective education initiatives. Objective: To characterize numeracy and literacy skills related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug labels in primary care patients. Methods: Patients were recruited and consented over an 8-month period after their regular primary care visit. Demographic information was collected and two instruments were administered to assess literacy and numeracy skills: (1) a medication label literacy instrument focused on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (MedLit-NSAID) and (2) a general healthy literacy-screening tool, the Newest Vital Sign. Two questions on the MedLit-NSAID instrument evaluated understanding of the Food and Drug Administration medication guide for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the Food and Drug Administration approved over-the-counter label. Results: A total of 145 patients were enrolled. Mean MedLit-NSAID and Newest Vital Sign scores were 6.8 (scale range 0–8) and 4.2 (scale range 0–6), respectively. Higher education level was associated with higher scores for both tools (p ⩽ 0.05). Total MedLit-NSAID scores on average were higher in females compared with males (6.5 vs 6, p = 0.05). Patients with decreased kidney function (n = 18) had significantly lower MedLit-NSAID scores (p ⩽ 0.05). Test–retest scores were not significantly different for MedLit-NSAID (p = 0.32). The correlation between the tools was 0.54 and internal consistency MedLit-NSAID was 0.61. Conclusion: A medication information focused instrument provided specific information to assess health literacy related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug labels. This information could be utilized to develop patient education initiatives for medication label comprehension.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric Piroulas ◽  
Louise Devillers ◽  
Cecile Souty ◽  
Jonathan Sicsic ◽  
Philippe Boisnault ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The safety of non-steroids anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the context of pharyngitis is doubtful with contradictory results in the literature. Objective To evaluate the risk of peritonsillar abscess (PTA) associated to NSAIDs consumption during a pharyngitis episode observed in primary care. Method A retrospective cohort study using Observatory of General Medicine Datalink from 1995 to 2010. All patients consulting a GP from the Datalink network for pharyngitis have been included. The occurrence of a PTA in the 15 days following the consultation for pharyngitis was matched. The association between PTA and prescriptions of NSAIDs was studied via an adjusted logistic regression model. Results During the study period, 105 802 cases of pharyngitis and 48 cases of PTA following a pharyngitis were reported, concerning respectively 67 765 and 47 patients. In the multivariate analysis, the risk of PTA was associated positively with a NSAIDs prescription (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.6–5.2). Other factors associated with PTA occurrence were the prescription of corticosteroids (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3–7.6) and an age between 20 and 40 years (OR = 5.7, 95% CI = 2.5–13.0). The prescription of antibiotics was not significantly associated with PTA (P = 0.7). Conclusion Prescription of NSAIDs in pharyngitis may increase the risk of PTA. This study encourages considering cautiously the balance between benefits and harms before prescription of NSAIDs for pharyngitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Lefebvre ◽  
Jade Hindié ◽  
Michael Zappitelli ◽  
Robert W Platt ◽  
Kristian B Filion

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) management focuses on limiting further renal injury, including avoiding nephrotoxic medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We performed a systematic review to evaluate the prevalence of primary care NSAID prescribing in this population. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to October 2017 for observational studies examining NSAID prescribing practices or use in CKD patients in a primary care setting. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed independently by two authors using a modified version of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research checklist. Results Our search generated 8055 potentially relevant publications, 304 of which were retrieved for full-text review. A total of 14 studies from 13 publications met our inclusion criteria. There were eight cohort and three cross-sectional studies, two quality improvement intervention studies and one prospective survey, representing a total of 49 209 CKD patients. Cross-sectional point prevalence of NSAID use in CKD patients ranged from 8 to 21%. Annual period prevalence rates ranged from 3 to 33%. Meta-analysis was not performed due to important clinical heterogeneity across study populations. Conclusions Evidence suggests that NSAID prescriptions/use in primary care among patients with CKD is variable and relatively high. Future research should explore reasons for this to better focus knowledge translation interventions aimed at reducing NSAID use in this patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document