scholarly journals Relationship of myocardial scar with cardiovascular disease risk factors in the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT)/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (EDIC) study

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evrim B Turkbey ◽  
Patricia A Cleary ◽  
Jye-Yu Backlund ◽  
John M Lachin ◽  
David M Nathan ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 344-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dee Pei ◽  
Yen-Lin Chen ◽  
Sai-Hung Tang ◽  
Chung-Ze Wu ◽  
Jiunn-Diann Lin ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. T193-T194
Author(s):  
Gabor Abellan van Kan ◽  
Yves Rolland ◽  
Fati Nourhashemi ◽  
Christelle Cantet ◽  
Sandrine Andrieu ◽  
...  

Obesity ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Gutin ◽  
Maribeth H. Johnson ◽  
Matthew C. Humphries ◽  
Jeannie L. Hatfield-Laube ◽  
Gaston K. Kapuku ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunmi Jung ◽  
Jihyun Park ◽  
Young-Gyun Seo

AbstractWe aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) according to the arm-to-leg ratio and limbs-to-trunk ratio for FM and FFM was compared, respectively. The higher the arm-to-leg FM ratio, the higher the prevalence of CVD-RF (DM-male-OR 7.04, 95% CI 4.22–11.74; DM-female-OR 10.57, 95% CI 5.80–19.26; MetS-male-OR 4.47, 95% CI 3.41- 5.86; MetS-female-OR 8.73, 95% CI 6.38–11.95). The higher the limbs-to-trunk FM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07–0.21; DM-female-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.23; MetS-male-OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.04–0.08; MetS-female-OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01–0.04), the higher the limbs-to-trunk FFM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11–0.31; DM-female-OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.70; MetS-male-OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31–0.50; MetS-female-OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), and the higher the arm-to-leg FFM ratio (MetS-male-OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.94; MetS-female-OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92), the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF. The higher the FM of the legs compared to the arms, FFM of the arms compared to the legs, and FM or FFM of the limbs compared to the trunk, the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document