scholarly journals Psychological predictors of negative treatment outcome with Erenumab in chronic migraine: data from an open label long-term prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bottiroli Sara ◽  
Roberto De Icco ◽  
Gloria Vaghi ◽  
Stefania Pazzi ◽  
Elena Guaschino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Psychological Predictors ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Childhood Traumas

Abstract Background Monoclonal antibodies (mABs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway represent the first disease-specific preventive migraine therapy. Growing evidence suggests that they are effective in the preventive treatment of difficult-to-treat patients. In this study, we evaluated the psychological predictors of the outcome of treatment with the anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM). Methods Seventy-five patients with CM who had already failed at least 3 preventive therapies received erenumab every 28 days for a period of 12 months. Before the first administration, patients received a full psychological evaluation using The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV) to assess personality disturbances (primary outcome), mood and anxiety disorders, and as well specific questionnaires to evaluate alexithymia traits, childhood traumas, and current stressors (secondary outcomes). Results After 12 months of treatment, 53 patients reported a reduction of at least 50% in headache days/per month (Responders), whereas 22 did not (Non Responders). When compared to Responders, Non Responders were characterized by a higher prevalence of personality disorders belonging to Cluster C (avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive) (77% vs 37%, p = .001). Non Responders were also characterized by a higher prevalence of anxiety disorders (90% vs 60%, p = 0.007), showed more alexithymic traits (51.7 ± 13.7 vs 42.9 ± 14.3, p = 0.017), and reported a higher number of 'at least serious' current stressors (3.2 ± 4.0 vs 0.8 ± 1.4, p < .0001) than Responders. At the multivariate analysis, higher prevalence of Cluster C personality disorders (OR 3.697; p = 0.05) and higher number of ‘at least serious’ life events (OR 1.382; p = 0.017) arose as prognostic factors of erenumab failure. Conclusions Erenumab confirmed its effectiveness in a population of difficult-to-treat migraine. The presence of “anxious-fearful” personality together with current stressors and anxiety represent negative predictors of treatment outcome. Trial registration The study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04361721).

Erenumab in prophylaxis of migraine – pilot study

Ból ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Marcin Kopka
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Migraine Headache ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
New Class ◽  
Calcitonin Gene

The aim of preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine is to reduce the frequency and severity of attacks and thereby improve patient’s quality of life. It is suggested that calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) plays a critical role in migraine patophysiology. In last few decades a new class of drugs was developed – monoclonal antibodies against CGRP. One of them is erenumab, which has been available in Poland since November 2018. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in migraine prophylaxis in polish patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Adult patients diagnosed with migraine (according to ICHD 3) with at least 4 migraine headache days in month were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with more than 50% reduction in number of migraine headache days after the first month of treatment. From December 2018 to April 2019 9 women (24–66 years; average 43.8 years) were included. The average migraine headache days in this study group was 9 (5–20). The participants were treated with subcutaneously delivered erenumab in daily dose of 70 mg. After the first month of treatment in 7 from 9 women (77.5 %) primary endpoint was reached. In 3 of 9 (30%) patients itch was noted. The results of this study suggest efficacy and good tolerability profile of erenumab in polish patients with episodic and chronic migraine. The future study are needed with larger groups of participants.

scholarly journals The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Ornello ◽  
Cindy Tiseo ◽  
Ilaria Frattale ◽  
Giulia Perrotta ◽  
Carmine Marini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Monthly Dose ◽  
Numerical Advantage

Abstract Background Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was approved for the prevention of episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) at the monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg. We reviewed the available literature to understand if patients with prior preventive treatment failures benefit more from the 140 mg dose than the 70 mg. Main body We searched papers indexed in PubMed and conference abstracts published in the last 2 years which assessed the safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with prior preventive treatment failures. We reviewed the results of 3 randomized controlled trials and their subgroup analyses and open-label extensions. The 140 mg monthly dose of erenumab had a numerical advantage over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with prior preventive treatment failures, both in EM and CM (with or without medication overuse) during the double blind phases of the trials and their open-label extensions. The numerical difference between the two doses increased with the increase in the number of prior preventive treatment failures. Conclusions The available data suggest that erenumab 140 mg monthly might be preferred over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with EM or CM and prior preventive treatment failures. Further data are needed to assess the long-term efficacy in clinical practice of the two doses of erenumab, while their safety profile is comparable.

scholarly journals The association of personality disorders with the prospective 7-year course of anxiety disorders

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1019-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. Ansell ◽  
A. Pinto ◽  
M. O. Edelen ◽  
J. C. Markowitz ◽  
C. A. Sanislow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Panic Disorder ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Compulsive Disorder

BackgroundThis study prospectively examined the natural clinical course of six anxiety disorders over 7 years of follow-up in individuals with personality disorders (PDs) and/or major depressive disorder. Rates of remission, relapse, new episode onset and chronicity of anxiety disorders were examined for specific associations with PDs.MethodParticipants were 499 patients with anxiety disorders in the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study, who were assessed with structured interviews for psychiatric disorders at yearly intervals throughout 7 years of follow-up. These data were used to determine probabilities of changes in disorder status for social phobia (SP), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder and panic disorder with agoraphobia.ResultsEstimated remission rates for anxiety disorders in this study group ranged from 73% to 94%. For those patients who remitted from an anxiety disorder, relapse rates ranged from 34% to 67%. Rates for new episode onsets of anxiety disorders ranged from 3% to 17%. Specific PDs demonstrated associations with remission, relapse, new episode onsets and chronicity of anxiety disorders. Associations were identified between schizotypal PD with course of SP, PTSD and GAD; avoidant PD with course of SP and OCD; obsessive-compulsive PD with course of GAD, OCD, and agoraphobia; and borderline PD with course of OCD, GAD and panic with agoraphobia.ConclusionsFindings suggest that specific PD diagnoses have negative prognostic significance for the course of anxiety disorders underscoring the importance of assessing and considering PD diagnoses in patients with anxiety disorders.

scholarly journals Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Botulinum Neurotoxin a in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: An Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao-Yao Chen ◽  
Xiao-Qian Ye ◽  
Tai-Chun Tang ◽  
Tian-Wei She ◽  
Min Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Botulinum Neurotoxin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Botulinum Neurotoxin A ◽  
Related Peptide ◽  
Calcitonin Gene

Purpose: Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) are new agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Comparison between CGRPmAbs and previously approved Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) will inform optimal preventive treatment of chronic migraine, but head-to-head trials are lacking. We therefore aimed to perform adjusted indirect comparison between CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A through a meta-analysis.Methods: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, clinical registries, and government websites were searched from inception to September 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing CGRPmAbs or BoNT-A with placebo in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine were included. The primary outcomes were headache days and migraine days measured at week 12. Data were synthesized by using a frequentist approach; and the treatments were ranked by P-score.Results: We included 10 trials (n = 4,678) after screening 1049 candidates. Six trials were with low risk of bias. Fremanezumab had an effect similar to BoNT-A in the reduction of headache days at week 12 (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.08, 95%CI -0.55 to -0.7). Galcanezumab reduced more migraine days than BoNT-A at week 12 (SMD, -0.94, 95%CI −1.24 to −0.63); fremanezumab showed similar findings (SMD, −0.55, 95%CI −0.85 to −0.24). Galcanezumab and fremanezumab had better effect in mitigating headache impact at week 12. CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A had similar adverse event rate.Conclusion: CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A had similar effect in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. BoNT-A might be preferentially selected owing to its cost-effectiveness profiles. Further studies with direct comparison of the two treatments are warranted.

scholarly journals Galcanezumab in chronic migraine

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (24) ◽  
pp. e2211-e2221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holland C. Detke ◽  
Peter J. Goadsby ◽  
Shufang Wang ◽  
Deborah I. Friedman ◽  
Katherine J. Selzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Injection Site Reaction ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide, in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine.MethodsA phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LY2951742 in patients with chronic migraine (Evaluation of Galcanezumab in the Prevention of Chronic Migraine [REGAIN]) was a phase 3 study with a 3-month double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase and a 9-month open-label extension. Eligible patients 18 to 65 years of age with chronic migraine were randomized 2:1:1 to monthly subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 558), galcanezumab 120 mg (with a 240-mg loading dose, n = 278), or galcanezumab 240 mg (n = 277). The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) during the 3-month double-blind treatment phase.ResultsMean number of monthly MHDs at baseline was 19.4 for the total sample. Both galcanezumab dose groups demonstrated greater overall mean reduction in the number of monthly MHDs compared to placebo (placebo −2.7, galcanezumab 120 mg −4.8, galcanezumab 240 mg −4.6) (p < 0.001 for each dose compared to placebo). There were no clinically meaningful differences between galcanezumab doses and placebo on any safety or tolerability outcome except for a higher incidence of treatment-emergent injection-site reaction (p < 0.01), injection-site erythema (p < 0.001), injection-site pruritus (p < 0.01), and sinusitis (p < 0.05) in the galcanezumab 240-mg group relative to placebo.ConclusionsBoth doses of galcanezumab were superior to placebo in reducing the number of monthly MHDs. Galcanezumab appears efficacious, safe, and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02614261.Classification of evidenceThis interventional study provides Class I evidence that galcanezumab is superior to placebo in the reduction of the number of monthly MHDs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document