scholarly journals Completeness of the operating room to intensive care unit handover: a matter of time?

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Dusse ◽  
Johanna Pütz ◽  
Andreas Böhmer ◽  
Mark Schieren ◽  
Robin Joppich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Time Pressure ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Information Loss ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
Underlying Diseases

Abstract Background Handovers of post-anesthesia patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) are often unstructured and performed under time pressure. Hence, they bear a high risk of poor communication, loss of information and potential patient harm. The aim of this study was to investigate the completeness of information transfer and the quantity of information loss during post anesthesia handovers of critical care patients. Methods Using a self-developed checklist, including 55 peri-operative items, patient handovers from the operation room or post anesthesia care unit to the ICU staff were observed and documented in real time. Observations were analyzed for the amount of correct and completely transferred patient data in relation to the written documentation within the anesthesia record and the patient’s chart. Results During a ten-week study period, 97 handovers were included. The mean duration of a handover was 146 seconds, interruptions occurred in 34% of all cases. While some items were transferred frequently (basic patient characteristics [72%], surgical procedure [83%], intraoperative complications [93.8%]) others were commonly missed (underlying diseases [23%], long-term medication [6%]). The completeness of information transfer is associated with the handover’s duration [B coefficient (95% CI): 0.118 (0.084-0.152), p<0.001] and increases significantly in handovers exceeding a duration of 2 minutes (24% ± 11.7 vs. 40% ± 18.04, p<0.001). Conclusions Handover completeness is affected by time pressure, interruptions, and inappropriate surroundings, which increase the risk of information loss. To improve completeness and ensure patient safety, an adequate time span for handover, and the implementation of communication tools are required.

Survival after cardiac surgery and long-term intensive care unit stay

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Schimmer ◽  
K Hamouda ◽  
M Özkur ◽  
SP Sommer ◽  
I Aleksic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Stay

Sportliche Leistung von Pferden, die als Fohlen intensivmedizinischer Behandlung bedurften

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (06) ◽  
pp. 399-399
Author(s):  
Lukas Demattio
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Sich Eine ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Intensivmedizinische Behandlung ◽  
Sportliche Leistung

Studies AC, Chidlow H, Ere SG et al. Factors associated with long-term athletic outcome in Thoroughbred neonates admitted to an intensive care unit. Equine Vet J 2019; 51: 716–719 Für viele Pferdezüchter stellt sich immer wieder die Frage, wie viel Geld in ein Fohlen investiert werden soll, wenn dieses tierärztlicher Behandlung bedarf. Lohnt sich eine intensivmedizinische Behandlung für ein Fohlen, das für eine sportliche Nutzung vorgesehen ist? Diese Frage versuchten die Autoren in der Studie zu beantworten.

scholarly journals Should the CIWA-Ar be the standard monitoring strategy for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the intensive care unit?

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa L. Steel ◽  
Shewit P. Giovanni ◽  
Sarah C. Katsandres ◽  
Shawn M. Cohen ◽  
Kevin B. Stephenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Alcohol Withdrawal ◽  
Withdrawal Syndrome ◽  
Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Alternative Measure ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Verbal Responses

Abstract Background The Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) is commonly used in hospitals to titrate medications for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), but may be difficult to apply to intensive care unit (ICU) patients who are too sick or otherwise unable to communicate. Objectives To evaluate the frequency of CIWA-Ar monitoring among ICU patients with AWS and variation in CIWA-Ar monitoring across patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Methods The study included all adults admitted to an ICU in 2017 after treatment for AWS in the Emergency Department of an academic hospital that standardly uses the CIWA-Ar to assess AWS severity and response to treatment. Demographic and clinical data, including Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) assessments (an alternative measure of agitation/sedation), were obtained via chart review. Associations between patient characteristics and CIWA-Ar monitoring were tested using logistic regression. Results After treatment for AWS, only 56% (n = 54/97) of ICU patients were evaluated using the CIWA-Ar; 94% of patients had a documented RASS assessment (n = 91/97). Patients were significantly less likely to receive CIWA-Ar monitoring if they were intubated or identified as Black. Conclusions CIWA-Ar monitoring was used inconsistently in ICU patients with AWS and completed less often in those who were intubated or identified as Black. These hypothesis-generating findings raise questions about the utility of the CIWA-Ar in ICU settings. Future studies should assess alternative measures for titrating AWS medications in the ICU that do not require verbal responses from patients and further explore the association of race with AWS monitoring.

scholarly journals Persistence of Pneumococcal Serotype 3 in Adult Pneumococcal Disease in Hong Kong

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 756
Author(s):  
Reema Subramanian ◽  
Veranja Liyanapathirana ◽  
Nilakshi Barua ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
Maggie Haitian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pneumococcal Disease ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Adult Vaccination ◽  
Pneumococcal Serotype ◽  
Pneumococcal Immunisation ◽  
Microbroth Dilution ◽  
Over Time

The epidemiology of hospitalised pneumococcal disease in adults following the introduction of universal childhood pneumococcal immunisation in 2009 was assessed. Culture-confirmed Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) from adults hospitalised between 2009 to 2017 were examined. The cases were categorised into invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumonia (bacteraemic, non-bacteraemic, and that associated with other lung conditions). The isolates were serotyped and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by microbroth dilution. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes were analysed. Seven hundred and seventy-four patients (mean age, 67.7 years, SD ± 15.6) were identified, and IPD was diagnosed in 110 (14.2%). The most prevalent serotype, 19F, was replaced by serotype 3 over time. Penicillin and cefotaxime non-susceptibilities were high at 54.1% and 39.5% (meningitis breakpoints), 19.9% and 25.5% (non-meningitis breakpoints), respectively. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.8% and 20.4% for IPD. Age ≥ 75 years (OR:4.6, CI:1.3–17.0, p < 0.02), presence of any complications (OR:4.1, CI:1.02–16.3, p < 0.05), pleural effusion (OR:6.7, CI:1.2–39.4, p < 0.03) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR:9.0, CI:1.3–63.4, p < 0.03) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Pneumococcal disease by PCV 13 covered serotypes; in particular, 19F and 3 are still prominent in adults. Strengthening targeted adult vaccination may be necessary in order to reduce disease burden.

The Impact of Implementing a “Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Bundle” in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Improved Delirium Diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise D. Cloedt ◽  
Kenza Benbouzid ◽  
Annie Lavoie ◽  
Marie-Élaine Metras ◽  
Marie-Christine Lavoie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Implementation Period ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
The Impact

AbstractDelirium is associated with significant negative outcomes, yet it remains underdiagnosed in children. We describe the impact of implementing a pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) bundle on the rate of delirium detection in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This represents a single-center, pre-/post-intervention retrospective and prospective cohort study. The study was conducted at a PICU in a quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital. All patients consecutively admitted to the PICU in October and November 2017 and 2018. Purpose of the study was describe the impact of the implementation of a PAD bundle. The rate of delirium detection and the utilization of sedative and analgesics in the pre- and post-implementation phases were measured. A total of 176 and 138 patients were admitted during the pre- and post-implementation phases, respectively. Of them, 7 (4%) and 44 (31.9%) were diagnosed with delirium (p < 0.001). Delirium was diagnosed in the first 48 hours of PICU admission and lasted for a median of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–4). Delirium diagnosis was higher in patients receiving invasive ventilation (p < 0.001). Compliance with the PAD bundle scoring was 79% for the delirium scale. Score results were discussed during medical rounds for 68% of the patients in the post-implementation period. The number of patients who received opioids and benzodiazepines and the cumulative doses were not statistically different between the two cohorts. More patients received dexmedetomidine and the cumulative daily dose was higher in the post-implementation period (p < 0.001). The implementation of a PAD bundle in a PICU was associated with an increased recognition of delirium diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this increased diagnostic rate on short- and long-term outcomes.

Management of long-term hypothyroidism: a potential marker of quality of medicines reconciliation in the intensive care unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Barrett ◽  
Andrew Jones ◽  
Craig Whiteley ◽  
Sarah Yassin ◽  
Cathrine A. McKenzie
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
Medicines Reconciliation

scholarly journals Outcomes of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Melanie Chan ◽  
Marlies Ostermann
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Icu Outcome ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) experience higher rates of hospitalisation, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality and are more likely to require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) than patients with normal renal function. Sepsis and cardiovascular diseases are the most common reasons for ICU admission. ICU mortality rates in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis are significantly higher than for patients without ESRD; however, dialysis patients have a better ICU outcome than those with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy suggesting that factors other than loss of renal function contribute to their prognosis. Current evidence suggests, the longer-term outcomes after discharge from ICU may be favourable and that long-term dependence on dialysis should not prejudice against prompt referral or admission to ICU.

scholarly journals Admission and Discharge Sampling Underestimates Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) Acquisition in an Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s28-s28
Author(s):  
Sarah Sansom ◽  
Michael Lin ◽  
Christine Fukuda ◽  
Teppei Shimasaki ◽  
Thelma Dangana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Incident Cases ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Background: Identification of hospitalized patients with enteric multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) carriage, combined with implementation of targeted infection control interventions, may help reduce MDRO transmission. However, the optimal surveillance approach has not been defined. We sought to determine whether daily serial rectal surveillance for MDROs detects more incident cases (acquisition) of MDRO colonization in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients than admission and discharge surveillance alone. Methods: Prospective longitudinal observational single-center study from January 11, 2017, to January 11, 2018. Inclusion criteria were ≥3 consecutive MICU days and ≥2 rectal or stool swabs per MICU admission. Daily rectal or stool swabs were collected from patients and cultured for MDROs, including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) (as a subset of 3GCR). MDRO detection at any time during the MICU stay was used to calculate prevalent colonization. Incident colonization (acquisition) was defined as new detection of an MDRO after at least 1 prior negative swab. We then determined the proportion of prevalent and incident cases detected by daily testing that were also detected when only first swabs (admission) and last swabs (discharge) were tested. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4 software. Results: In total, 939 MICU stays of 842 patients were analyzed. Patient characteristics were median age 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51–74), median MICU length of stay 5 days (IQR, 3–8), median number of samples per admission 3 (IQR, 2–5), and median Charlson index 4 (IQR, 2–7). Prevalent colonization with any MDRO was detected by daily swabbing in 401 stays (42.7%). Compared to daily serial swabbing, an admission- and discharge-only approach detected ≥86% of MDRO cases (ie, overall prevalent MDRO colonization). Detection of incident MDRO colonization by an admission- or discharge-only approach would have detected fewer cases than daily swabbing (Figure 1); ≥34% of total MDRO acquisitions would have been missed. Conclusions: Testing patients upon admission and discharge to an MICU may fail to detect MDRO acquisition in more than one-third of patients, thereby reducing the effectiveness of MDRO control programs that are targeted against known MDRO carriers. The poor performance of a single discharge swab may be due to intermittent or low-level MDRO shedding, inadequate sampling, or transient MDRO colonization. Additional research is needed to determine the optimal surveillance approach of enteric MDRO carriage.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document