scholarly journals General practitioners’ experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards, general practice-based pharmacists: a cross-sectional survey

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameerah S. Hasan Ibrahim ◽  
Heather E. Barry ◽  
Carmel M. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
General Practices

Abstract Background There is limited United Kingdom (UK) literature on general practice-based pharmacists’ (PBPs’) role evolution and few studies have explored general practitioners’ (GPs’) experiences on pharmacist integration into general practice. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate GPs’ experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards PBPs in Northern Ireland (NI). Methods A paper-based self-administered questionnaire comprising four sections was mailed in 2019 to 329 general practices across NI and was completed by one GP in every practice who had most contact with the PBP. Descriptive analyses were used and responses to open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results The response rate was 61.7% (203/329). There was at least one PBP per general practice. All GPs had face-to-face meetings with PBPs, with three-quarters (78.7%, n = 159) meeting with the PBP more than once a week. Approximately two-thirds of GPs (62.4%, n = 126) reported that PBPs were qualified as independent prescribers, and 76.2% of these (n = 96/126) indicated that prescribers were currently prescribing for patients. The majority of GPs reported that PBPs always/very often had the required clinical skills (83.6%, n = 162) and knowledge (87.0%, n = 167) to provide safe and effective care for patients. However, 31.1% (n = 61) stated that PBPs only sometimes had the confidence to make clinical decisions. The majority of GPs (> 85%) displayed largely positive attitudes towards collaboration with PBPs. Most GPs agreed/strongly agreed that PBPs will have a positive impact on patient outcomes (95.0%, n = 192) and can provide a better link between general practices and community pharmacists (96.1%, n = 194). However, 24.8% of GPs (n = 50) were unclear if the PBP role moved community pharmacists to the periphery of the primary care team. An evaluation of the free-text comments indicated that GPs were in favour of more PBP sessions and full-time posts. Conclusion Most GPs had positive views of, and attitudes towards, PBPs. The findings may have implications for future developments in order to extend integration of PBPs within general practice, including the enhancement of training in clinical skills and decision-making. Exploring PBPs’, community pharmacists’ and patients’ views of this role in general practice is required to corroborate study findings.

scholarly journals A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners’ experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards, practice-based pharmacists

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i24-i25
Author(s):  
A H Ibrahim ◽  
H Barry ◽  
C M Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Full Time ◽  
General Practices

Abstract Introduction Five-year pilot schemes were announced in both England and Northern Ireland (NI) to integrate practice-based pharmacists (PBPs) into general practices. The NI scheme anticipates that there will be 300 whole time equivalent PBPs in post by the end of the pilot (2020/2021).[1] There is little existing UK literature on PBPs’ role evolution and few studies have explored general practitioners’ (GPs) experiences of pharmacist integration into primary care practice. Aim To investigate GPs’ experiences with PBPs, their views about the PBP role and its impact upon patients and GPs, and their attitudes towards collaboration with PBPs. Methods A paper-based self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all general practices (n=329) across Northern Ireland (NI) on two occasions during September and October 2019, and was completed by one GP in every practice who had most contact with the PBP. The questionnaire was developed following a comprehensive literature review and comprised four sections (Table 1). Descriptive analyses were conducted using SPSS v26 and responses to open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results The response rate was 61.7% (203/329). Respondents had a median age of 52.0 years and there was at least one PBP per general practice. All GPs had face-to-face meetings with PBPs, with three-quarters (78.7%, n=159) meeting with the PBP more than once a week. GPs reported that two-thirds of PBPs (62.4%, n=126) were qualified as independent prescribers, with 76.2% of prescribers (n=96) currently prescribing for patients. The most common PBP activities were medication reconciliation and medication reviews. The majority of GPs reported that PBPs always/very often had the required clinical skills (83.6%, n=162) and knowledge (87.0%, n=167) to provide safe and effective care for patients. However, only 31.1% (n=61) stated that PBPs sometimes had the confidence to make clinical decisions. The majority of GPs (>85%) displayed largely positive attitudes towards collaboration with PBPs. Most respondents agreed/strongly agreed that PBPs will have a positive impact on patient outcomes (95.0%, n=192) and can provide a better link between general practices and community pharmacists (96.1%, n=194). However, 24.8% of GPs (n=50) were unclear if the PBP role moved community pharmacists to the periphery of the primary care team. Thematic analysis of the open comments indicated that GPs were in favour of more PBP sessions and full-time posts. Conclusion This study has revealed that the majority of GPs had positive views and attitudes about the PBP role, its impact in primary care and collaboration with PBPs. The findings may have implications for future developments in order to extend integration of PBPs within general practice, including the enhancement of training in clinical skills and decision-making. Our target sample included all general practices within NI and the response rate enhanced generalisability at the practice level. However, the study sample was limited to NI, and some findings may not be relevant to other parts of the UK. Further work is required to explore PBPs’, community pharmacists’ and patients’ views of this role in general practice to corroborate study findings. References 1. Strategic Leadership Group for Pharmacy. Practice-based pharmacists' statement. 2016. (Online) Available at: https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/practice-based-pharmacists.pdf (accessed 06 Oct 2020). 2. Van C, Costa D, Mitchell B, Abbott P, Krass I. Development and validation of a measure and a model of general practitioner attitudes toward collaboration with pharmacists. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2013; 9(6): 688–699.

scholarly journals Couple relationship problems—a task for the general practitioner? A cross-sectional survey from Norway

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siri Dalsmo Berge ◽  
Eivind Meland ◽  
Mette Brekke ◽  
Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik ◽  
Frode Thuen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioner ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Couple Relationship ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relationship Problems ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
General Practices

Abstract Background A healthy couple relationship is a predictor of good health. There is a lack of knowledge about what role family and couples counselling should have in general practice. Objectives To identify the prevalence of patients who have talked, or want to talk, with their general practitioner (GP) about their couple relationship, to investigate what characterizes these patients and to explore whether they believe that couple relationship problems should be dealt with in general practice. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 70 general practices in Norway during spring 2019. A questionnaire was answered by 2178 consecutive patients (response rate 75%) in GP waiting rooms. Data were examined using frequencies and linear and logistic regression models. Results We included 2097 responses. Mean age was 49.0 years and 61.3% were women. One in four (25.0%) had already talked with their GP about couple relationship problems, while one in three (33.5%) wanted to talk with their GP about their couple relationship problems. These patients more frequently had experience of divorce, poor self-rated health, an opinion that their couple relationship had a significant impact on their health and lower couple relationship quality when adjusted for age, sex, present marital status and children living at home. We found that 46.4% of patients believed that GPs should be interested in their couple relationship problems. Conclusion Relationship problems are frequently addressed in general practice. GPs should be prepared to discuss this issue to facilitate help for couples earlier than they might otherwise expect.

International work and leadership in UK general practice

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Young ◽  
Chris Smith ◽  
Luisa Pettigrew ◽  
Ha-Neul Seo ◽  
David Blane
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
High Income ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
International Work ◽  
Low Middle Income Countries ◽  
The Uk

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present an exploration of the leadership competencies developed by UK GPs through having undertaken international work and the ability to transfer these competencies back to the UK. Design/methodology/approach – The approach taken is a cross-sectional survey. Findings – A total of 439 UK-based, ranging from GP specialty trainees to retired GPs who had worked overseas, responded to an online survey of UK general practice and international work. Doctors were asked to report competency development through international work using the domains of the Medical Leadership Competency Framework (MLCF). The most common competencies developed, to a “moderate or significant” degree, related to “personal qualities” (89 per cent) and “working in teams” (87 per cent). To a lesser extent Doctors developed competencies in “setting direction” (60 per cent), “managing services” (59 per cent), and “service improvement” (56 per cent), and found these competencies harder to transfer back to the UK. A common reason for limited transfer of competency was the lack of leadership opportunities for Doctors when returning to UK locum roles. Overseas posts were more common in low/middle income countries, and these Doctors reported a greater range of leadership roles, including in health policy, management and teaching, compared to high-income countries. Most doctors felt that they were able to develop their clinical skills overseas whilst relatively few Doctors performed research, especially in high-income countries. Originality/value – To the authors' knowledge this is the first cross-sectional survey exploring the international work of UK GPs and leadership development using the MLCF domains.

scholarly journals Parents’ and guardians’ views and experiences of accessing routine childhood vaccinations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: A mixed methods study in England

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244049
Author(s):  
Sadie Bell ◽  
Richard Clarke ◽  
Pauline Paterson ◽  
Sandra Mounier-Jack
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Childhood Vaccination ◽  
Vaccine Preventable Disease ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Preventable Disease ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Routine Childhood ◽  
General Practices

Objective To explore parents’ and guardians’ views and experiences of accessing National Health Service (NHS) general practices for routine childhood vaccinations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in England. Design Mixed methods approach involving an online cross-sectional survey (conducted between 19th April and 11th May 2020) and semi-structured telephone interviews (conducted between 27th April and 27th May 2020). Participants 1252 parents and guardians (aged 16+ years) who reported living in England with a child aged 18 months or under completed the survey. Nineteen survey respondents took part in follow-up interviews. Results The majority of survey respondents (85.7%) considered it important for their children to receive routine vaccinations on schedule during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, several barriers to vaccination were identified. These included a lack of clarity around whether vaccination services were operating as usual, particularly amongst respondents from lower income households and those self-reporting as Black, Asian, Chinese, Mixed or Other ethnicity; difficulties in organising vaccination appointments; and fears around contracting COVID-19 while attending general practice. Concerns about catching COVID-19 while accessing general practice were weighed against concerns about children acquiring a vaccine-preventable disease if they did not receive scheduled routine childhood vaccinations. Many parents and guardians felt their child’s risk of acquiring a vaccine-preventable disease was low as the implementation of stringent physical distancing measures (from March 23rd 2020) meant they were not mixing with others. Conclusion To promote routine childhood vaccination uptake during the current COVID-19 outbreak, further waves of COVID-19 infection, and future pandemics, prompt and sustained national and general practice level communication is needed to raise awareness of vaccination service continuation and the importance of timely vaccination, and invitation-reminder systems for vaccination need to be maintained. To allay concerns about the safety of accessing general practice, practices should communicate the measures being implemented to prevent COVID-19 transmission.

From Mother’s Little Helper to General Practitioner’s Dilemma: Confidence in the Recognition and Management of Benzodiazepine Dependence in the Great Southern Region of Western Australia

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
National Level ◽  
Southern Region ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Survey Response Rate ◽  
Benzodiazepine Dependence

Introduction: Benzodiazepines are among the most commonly prescribed medications in general practice in Australia. This offers an important opportunity to recognise and manage dependence. Objectives: investigate the level of confidence General Practitioners in the Great Southern Region of Western Australia have in recognizing and managing benzodiazepine dependence. Method: a cross sectional survey was sent to all the general practitioners in the Great Southern Region practicing at the time the survey was disseminated. Results: the survey response rate was 35%. The majority of respondents were more confident in recognizing, rather than managing, dependence. The most common barrier to recognition and management was inconsistent prescribing within practices, followed by lack of time and experience. Discussion: Barriers to managing benzodiazepine dependence appear to play a significant part in undermining General Practitioner (GP) confidence and practice, suggesting that additional practical and systems supports need to be available at a practice, regional and national level.

scholarly journals Contract and ownership type of general practices and patient experience in England: multilevel analysis of a national cross-sectional survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 440-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E Cowling ◽  
Anthony A Laverty ◽  
Matthew J Harris ◽  
Hilary C Watt ◽  
Felix Greaves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Survey ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Ownership Type ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reports ◽  
General Practices

Objective To examine associations between the contract and ownership type of general practices and patient experience in England. Design Multilevel linear regression analysis of a national cross-sectional patient survey (General Practice Patient Survey). Setting All general practices in England in 2013–2014 ( n = 8017). Participants 903,357 survey respondents aged 18 years or over and registered with a general practice for six months or more (34.3% of 2,631,209 questionnaires sent). Main outcome measures Patient reports of experience across five measures: frequency of consulting a preferred doctor; ability to get a convenient appointment; rating of doctor communication skills; ease of contacting the practice by telephone; and overall experience (measured on four- or five-level interval scales from 0 to 100). Models adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents and general practice populations and a random intercept for each general practice. Results Most practices had a centrally negotiated contract with the UK government (‘General Medical Services’ 54.6%; 4337/7949). Few practices were limited companies with locally negotiated ‘Alternative Provider Medical Services’ contracts (1.2%; 98/7949); these practices provided worse overall experiences than General Medical Services practices (adjusted mean difference −3.04, 95% CI −4.15 to −1.94). Associations were consistent in direction across outcomes and largest in magnitude for frequency of consulting a preferred doctor (−12.78, 95% CI −15.17 to −10.39). Results were similar for practices owned by large organisations (defined as having ≥20 practices) which were uncommon (2.2%; 176/7949). Conclusions Patients registered to general practices owned by limited companies, including large organisations, reported worse experiences of their care than other patients in 2013–2014.

Investigating Patient Trust in Doctors: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Out-Patient Departments in Fiji

2020 ◽  
pp. 0272684X2096760
Author(s):  
Swastika Chandra ◽  
Paul Ward ◽  
Masoud Mohammadnezhad
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Communication Behavior ◽  
Regression Result ◽  
Outpatient Services ◽  
Patient Trust ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Equal Importance ◽  
Logistic Regression Result

Background Despite evidence on the positive impact of trust in a doctor-patient relationship on health outcomes, there are limited studies conducted in Pacific Island Countries including Fiji. This study was conducted to assess the current level of patient trust in doctors and investigate its determinants in Fiji. Method: A random sample of 410 participants attending the outpatient services completed the self-administered structured questionnaire. The response rate was 91% (N=375) and data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and analytic analysis using logistic regression. Result: Mean age of participants was 38years (±15yrs). The majority of patients had partial trust in their doctors compared to full trust (61.6% vs 38.4%). More than half of the participants perceived doctor’s communication behavior as fair rather than good (53.6% vs 45.6%). Those over 50 years (OR 1.96; p=0.007, 95% CI: 1.198–3.226) and those who perceived doctors’ communication behavior as good (OR 8.48; p=0.0001, 95% CI: 5.257–13.709) were significantly more likely to have full trust in the doctors. Conclusion: This study reveals that age and communication are determinants of trust in Fiji. In view of the current perception of the doctors’ communication behavior, Fiji’s Ministry of Health and Medical Services should implement policies to give equal importance to the communication skills of the doctors together with their clinical skills and enforce it in the medical schools.

scholarly journals General practitioners’ predictions of their own patients’ health literacy: a cross-sectional study in Belgium

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e029357
Author(s):  
Hannelore Storms ◽  
Bert Aertgeerts ◽  
Frank Vandenabeele ◽  
Neree Claes
Keyword(s):  
Health Literacy ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adequate Health Literacy ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Patient Relationships ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesTo support patients in their disease management, providing information that is adjusted to patients’ knowledge and ability to process health information (ie, health literacy) is crucial. To ensure effective health communication, general practitioners (GPs) should be able to identify people with limited health literacy. To this end, (dis)agreement between patients’ health literacy and GPs’ estimations thereof was examined. Also, characteristics impacting health literacy (dis)agreement were studied.DesignCross-sectional survey of general practice patients and GPs undertaken in 2016–17.SettingForty-one general practices in two Dutch-speaking provinces in Belgium.ParticipantsPatients (18 years of age and older) visiting general practices. Patients were excluded when having severe impairments (physical, mental, sensory).Main outcome measuresPatients’ health literacy was assessed with 16-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire. GPs indicated estimations on patients’ health literacy using a simple scale (inadequate; problematic; adequate). (Dis)agreement between patients’ health literacy and GPs’ estimations thereof (GPs’ estimations being equal to/higher/lower than patients’ health literacy) was measured using Kappa statistics. The impact of patient and GP characteristics, including duration of GP–patient relationships, on this (dis)agreement was examined using generalised linear logit model.ResultsHealth literacy of patients (n=1375) was inadequate (n=201; 14.6%), problematic (n=299; 21.7%), adequate (n=875; 63.6%). GPs overestimated the proportion patients with adequate health literacy: adequate (n=1241; 90.3%), problematic (n=130; 9.5%) and inadequate (n=4; 0.3%). Overall, GPs’ correct; over-/underestimations of health literacy occurred for, respectively, 60.9%; 34.2%; 4.9% patients, resulting in a slight agreement (κ=0.033). The likelihood for GPs to over-/underestimate patients’ health literacy increases with decreasing educational level of patients; and decreasing number of years patients have been consulting with their GP.ConclusionsIntuitively assessing health literacy is difficult. Patients’ education, the duration of GP–patient relationships and GPs’ gender impact GPs’ perceptions of patients’ health literacy.

scholarly journals Mapping the scope of occupational therapy practice in palliative care: A European Association for Palliative Care cross-sectional survey

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 960-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Eva ◽  
Deidre Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Occupational Therapy ◽  
European Association ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Service Development ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Research Activities

Background: Occupational therapists play an integral role in the care of people with life-limiting illnesses. However, little is known about the scope of occupational therapy service provision in palliative care across Europe and factors influencing service delivery. Aim: This study aimed to map the scope of occupational therapy palliative care interventions across Europe and to explore occupational therapists’ perceptions of opportunities and challenges when delivering and developing palliative care services. Design: A 49-item online cross-sectional survey comprised of fixed and free text responses was securely hosted via the European Association for Palliative Care website. Survey design, content and recruitment processes were reviewed and formally approved by the European Association for Palliative Care Board of Directors. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyse data. Setting/respondents: Respondents were European occupational therapists whose caseload included palliative care recipients (full-time or part-time). Results: In total, 237 valid responses were analysed. Findings demonstrated a consistency in occupational therapy practice in palliative care between European countries. Clinician time was prioritised towards indirect patient care, with limited involvement in service development, leadership and research. A need for undergraduate and postgraduate education was identified. Organisational expectations and understanding of the scope of the occupational therapy role constrain the delivery of services to support patients and carers. Conclusion: Further development of occupational therapy in palliative care, particularly capacity building in leadership and research activities, is warranted. There is a need for continuing education and awareness raising of the role of occupational therapy in palliative care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document