scholarly journals Ocular related emergencies in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic, a multicenter study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín Puzo ◽  
Jorge Sánchez-Monroy ◽  
Carmen A. Porcar-Plana ◽  
Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal ◽  
Marina Dotti-Boada ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate ophthalmological emergencies (OE) during the COVID-19 pandemic comparing them with the same period of the previous year. Methods Retrospective observational study of all OE visits in four tertiary hospitals in Spain comparing data from March 16th to April 30th, 2020 (COVID-19 period) and the same period of 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period). Severity of the conditions was assessed following Channa et al. publication. Data on demographics, diagnosis and treatments were collected from Electronic Medical Records. Results During lockdown, OE significantly declined by 75.18%, from 7,730 registered in the pre-COVID-19 period to 1,928 attended during the COVID-19 period (p < 0.001). In 2019, 23.86% of visits were classified as emergent, 59.50% as non-emergent, and 16.65% could not be determined. In 2020, the percentage of emergent visits increased up to 29.77%, non-emergent visits significantly decreased to 52.92% (p < 0.001), and 17.31% of the visits were classified as “could not determine”. During the pandemic, people aged between 45 and 65 years old represented the largest attending group (37.89%), compared to 2019, where patients over 65 years were the majority (39.80%). In 2019, most frequent diagnosis was unspecified acute conjunctivitis (11.59%), followed by vitreous degeneration (6.47%), and punctate keratitis (5.86%). During the COVID-19 period, vitreous degeneration was the first cause for consultation (9.28%), followed by unspecified acute conjunctivitis (5.63%) and punctate keratitis (5.85%). Conclusions OE visits dropped significantly during the pandemic in Spain (75.18%), although more than half were classified as non-urgent conditions, indicating a lack of understanding of the really emergent ocular pathologies among population.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Puzo ◽  
Jorge Sanchez-Monroy ◽  
Carmen Alejandra Porcar-Plana ◽  
Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal ◽  
Marina Dotti-Boada ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE: To evaluate ophthalmological emergencies (OE) during the COVID-19 pandemic comparing them with the same period of the previous year. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all OE visits in four tertiary hospitals in Spain comparing data from March 16th to April 30th, 2020 (COVID-19 period) and the same period of 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period). Severity of the conditions was assessed following Channa et al. publication. Data on demographics, diagnosis and treatments were collected from Electronic Medical Records. RESULTS: During lockdown, OE significantly declined by 75.18%, from 7,730 registered in the pre-COVID-19 period to 1,928 attended during the COVID-19 period (p<0.001). In 2019, 23.86% of visits were classified as emergent, 59.50% as non-emergent, and 16.65% could not be determined. In 2020, the percentage of emergent visits increased up to 29.77%, non-emergent visits significantly decreased to 52.92% (p<0.001), and 17.31% of the visits were classified as “could not determine”. During the pandemic, people aged between 45 and 65 years old represented the largest attending group (37.89%), compared to 2019, where patients over 65 years were the majority (39.80%). In 2019, most frequent diagnosis was unspecified acute conjunctivitis (11.59%), followed by vitreous degeneration (6.47%), and punctate keratitis (5.86%). During the COVID-19 period, vitreous degeneration was the first cause for consultation (9.28%), followed by unspecified acute conjunctivitis (5.63%) and punctate keratitis (5.85%). CONCLUSIONS: OE visits dropped significantly during the pandemic in Spain (75.18%), although more than half were classified as non-urgent conditions, indicating a lack of understanding of the really emergent ocular pathologies among population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Puzo ◽  
Jorge Sanchez-Monroy ◽  
Carmen Alejandra Porcar Plana ◽  
Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal ◽  
Marina Dotti-Boada ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate ophthalmological emergencies (OE) during the COVID-19 pandemic comparing them with the same period of the previous year. Methods: Retrospective observational study of all OE visits in four tertiary hospitals in Spain comparing data from March 16th to April 30th, 2020 (COVID-19 period) and the same period of 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period). Severity of the conditions was assessed following Channa et al. publication. Data on demographics, diagnosis and treatments were collected from Electronic Medical Records. Results: During lockdown, OE significantly declined by 75.18%, from 7,730 registered in the pre-COVID-19 period to 1,928 attended during the COVID-19 period (p<0.001). In 2019, 23.86% of visits were classified as emergent, 59.50% as non-emergent, and 16.65% could not be determined. In 2020, the percentage of emergent visits increased up to 29.77%, non-emergent visits significantly decreased to 52.92% (p<0.001), and 17.31% of the visits were classified as “could not determine”. During the pandemic, people aged between 45 and 65 years old represented the largest attending group (37.89%), compared to 2019, where patients over 65 years were the majority (39.80%). In 2019, most frequent diagnosis was unspecified acute conjunctivitis (11.59%), followed by vitreous degeneration (6.47%), and punctate keratitis (5.86%). During the COVID-19 period, vitreous degeneration was the first cause for consultation (9.28%), followed by unspecified acute conjunctivitis (5.63%) and punctate keratitis (5.85%). Conclusions: OE visits dropped significantly during the pandemic in Spain (75.18%), although more than half were classified as non-urgent conditions, indicating a lack of understanding of the really emergent ocular pathologies among population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoria Larsson ◽  
Cecilia Nordenson ◽  
Pontus Karling

Abstract Objectives Opioids are commonly prescribed post-surgery. We investigated the proportion of patients who were prescribed any opioids 6–12 months after two common surgeries – laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gastric by-pass (GBP) surgery. A secondary aim was to examine risk factors prior to surgery associated with the prescription of any opioids after surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study on data from medical records from patients who underwent cholecystectomy (n=297) or GBP (n=93) in 2018 in the Region of Västerbotten, Sweden. Data on prescriptions for opioids and other drugs were collected from the patients` medical records. Results There were 109 patients (28%) who were prescribed opioids after discharge from surgery but only 20 patients (5%) who still received opioid prescriptions 6–12 months after surgery. All 20 of these patients had also been prescribed opioids within three months before surgery, most commonly for back and joint pain. Only 1 out of 56 patients who were prescribed opioids preoperatively due to gallbladder pain still received prescriptions for opioids 6–12 months after surgery. Although opioid use in the early postoperative period was more common among patients who underwent cholecystectomy, the patients who underwent GBP were more prone to be “long-term” users of opioids. In the patients who were prescribed opioids within three months prior to surgery, 8 out of 13 patients who underwent GBP and 12 of the 96 patients who underwent cholecystectomy were still prescribed opioids 6–12 months after surgery (OR 11.2; 95% CI 3.1–39.9, p=0,0002). Affective disorders were common among “long-term” users of opioids and prior benzodiazepine and amitriptyline use were significantly associated with “long-term” opioid use. Conclusions The proportion of patients that used opioids 6–12 months after cholecystectomy or GBP was low. Patients with preoperative opioid-use experienced a significantly higher risk of “long-term” opioid use when undergoing GBP compared to cholecystectomy. The indication for being prescribed opioids in the “long-term” were mostly unrelated to surgery. No patient who was naïve to opioids prior surgery was prescribed opioids 6–12 months after surgery. Although opioids are commonly prescribed in the preoperative and in the early postoperative period to patients with gallbladder disease, there is a low risk that these prescriptions will lead to long-term opioid use. The reasons for being prescribed opioids in the long-term are often due to causes not related to surgery.


CMAJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. E538-E544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Biro ◽  
Dave Barber ◽  
Tyler Williamson ◽  
Rachael Morkem ◽  
Shahriar Khan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Neves Fialho Queiroz ◽  
Andrea da Costa Moreira de Oliveira ◽  
Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves ◽  
Lucas Araújo de Borges Moura ◽  
Daniel Sousa César ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-397
Author(s):  
Diah Ayu Kusuma ◽  
Indranila Kustarini Samsuria

Pendahuluan : Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) merupakan gangguan fungsi ginjal yang irreversible, yaitu kemampuan tubuh gagal untuk mempertahankan metabolisme dan keseimbangan cairan dan elektrolit dan juga mineral. Sebagian besar proses metabolisme memerlukan dan dipengaruhi oleh elektrolit. Konsentrasi elektrolit mineral yang tidak normal dapat menyebabkan banyak gangguan .  Saat fungsi ginjal semakin memburuk menjadi Stadium CKD 4 dan 5, ekskresinya cenderung berkurang dan tidak dapat dikompensasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melihat pengaruh CKD pada mineral yaitu magnesium dan calcium. Metode : Penelitian ini adalah penelitian observasional retrospektif dengan pendekatan belah lintang (cross sectional) dengan melihat rekam medik pada senter tunggal di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang selama periode 1 Januari 2017 – 31 Desember 2018 untuk kemudian dilihat hubungan pengaruh kadar kreatinin serum dengan magnesium dan calcium pada pasien CKD dengan terapi hemodialisis. Hasil dan pembahasan: Terdapat hubungan signifikan positif lemah antara kreatinin serum dengan magnesium (p=0,032, r= 0,327).  Tidak terdapat hubungan antara kreatinin serum dengan kadar kalsium. Simpulan : Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa secara statistik terdapat hubungan yang bermakna antara kadar kreatinin serum dengan magnesium pada pasien Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) dengan terapi hemodialisis. Kata Kunci Kreatinin, mineral, magnesium Chronic Kidney Disease, hemodialisis.   ABSTRACT Introduction: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is an irreversible kidney function disorder, which is the body's ability to fail to maintain metabolism and balance fluid and electrolytes and minerals. Most metabolic processes require and are influenced by electrolytes. Abnormal mineral electrolyte concentrations can cause many disturbances. When kidney function getting worse to stages CKD 4 and 5, the excretion tends to decrease and cannot be compensated. The purpose of this study is to look at the effect of CKD on minerals namely magnesium and calcium. Method: This study was a retrospective observational study with a cross sectional approach by looking at medical records at RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang during the period of 1 January 2017 - 31 December 2018 to see the correlation of  influence of serum creatinine levels with magnesium and calcium in CKD patients with hemodialysis therapy. Results and discussion: There was a significantly weak positive correlation between serum creatinine and magnesium (p = 0.032, r = 0.327). There is no correlation between serum creatinine and calcium levels. Conclusion: The results of the study it can be concluded that there is a statistically significant correlation between serum creatinine levels with magnesium in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients with hemodialysis therapy. Keywords Creatinine, minerals, magnesium Chronic Kidney Disease, hemodialysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document