scholarly journals Increase in relative skeletal muscle mass over time and its inverse association with metabolic syndrome development: a 7-year retrospective cohort study

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyuri Kim ◽  
Seung-Eun Lee ◽  
Ji Eun Jun ◽  
You-Bin Lee ◽  
Jiyeon Ahn ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Yuka Hasegawa ◽  
Fuyuko Takahashi ◽  
Yoshitaka Hashimoto ◽  
Chihiro Munekawa ◽  
Yukako Hosomi ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic restrictions on the change in muscle mass in older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who were not infected with COVID-19. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were obtained from outpatients who underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis at least twice before April 2020 and at least once thereafter. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, kg/m2) was calculated as appendicular muscle mass (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Change in SMI (kg/m2/year) was calculated as (follow-up SMI—baseline SMI/follow-up period). The differences between the changes in SMI before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were evaluated using paired t test. Results: This study recruited 56 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 75.2 (7.1) years. SMI changed from 6.7 (0.9) to 6.8 (0.9) kg/m2 before the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas SMI changed from 6.8 (0.9) to 6.6 (0.9) kg/m2 after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. SMI decreased after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic (−0.117 (0.240) vs. 0.005 (0.289) kg/m2/year, p = 0.049). This decrease was observed in men (−0.159 (0.257) vs. 0.031 (0.325) kg/m2/year, p = 0.038), patients with poor glycemic control (−0.170 (0.264) vs. 0.031 (0.285) kg/m2/year, p = 0.042), and those with a long diabetes duration (−0.153 (0.229) vs. 0.082 (0.291) kg/m2, p = 0.049). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions caused muscle mass loss in older patents with T2D. Actions, including recommendation of exercise and adequate diet intake, are needed to prevent loss of muscle mass.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 3220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Hashimoto ◽  
Ayumi Kaji ◽  
Ryosuke Sakai ◽  
Fuyuko Takahashi ◽  
Rena Kawano ◽  
...  

Exercise has been reported to be effective in maintaining and recovering muscle; however, the effect of exercise combined with adequate or inadequate protein intake on muscle mass is not clear. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of exercise habit on changes in muscle mass, with adequate or inadequate protein intake. This retrospective cohort study included 214 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The rate of skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) change (%) was defined as ((SMI at follow-up minus SMI at baseline)/(follow-up years [kg/m2/year] × SMI at baseline [kg/m2])) × 100. Adequate protein intake was defined as protein intake ≥1.2 g/kg ideal body weight/day. During a mean follow-up duration of 18.0 (7.1) months, the rate of SMI change was −1.14 (4.10)% in the whole sample. The rate of SMI change of non-habitual exercisers with inadequate protein intake, habitual exercisers with inadequate protein intake, non-habitual exercisers with adequate protein intake, and habitual exercisers with adequate protein intake was −1.22 (3.71), −2.31 (3.30), −1.88 (4.62), and 0.36 (4.29)%, respectively. Compared with patients with exercise habit and adequate protein intake, the odds ratio for decreasing SMI was 2.50 (0.90–6.90, p = 0.078) in patients with no exercise habit and inadequate protein intake, 3.58 (1.24–10.4, p = 0.019) in those with exercise habit and inadequate protein intake, and 3.03 (1.27–7.22, p = 0.012) in those with no exercise habit and adequate protein intake, after adjusting for covariates. Therefore, exercise habit without adequate protein intake was associated with an increased risk of decreasing SMI compared with exercise habit with adequate protein intake.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Valdez-Ortiz ◽  
Geovana Martín-Alemañy ◽  
Monserrat Pérez-Navarro ◽  
Alberto Rosas-Herrera ◽  
Héctor Hinojosa-Heredia ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Megan M Sheehan ◽  
Anita J Reddy ◽  
Michael B Rothberg

Abstract Background Protection afforded from prior disease among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is unknown. If infection provides substantial long-lasting immunity, it may be appropriate to reconsider vaccination distribution. Methods This retrospective cohort study of 1 health system included 150 325 patients tested for COVID-19 infection via polymerase chain reaction from 12 March 2020 to 30 August 2020. Testing performed up to 24 February 2021 in these patients was included. The main outcome was reinfection, defined as infection ≥90 days after initial testing. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic infection and protection of prior infection against reinfection. Results Of 150 325 patients, 8845 (5.9%) tested positive and 141 480 (94.1%) tested negative before 30 August. A total of 1278 (14.4%) positive patients were retested after 90 days, and 62 had possible reinfection. Of those, 31 (50%) were symptomatic. Of those with initial negative testing, 5449 (3.9%) were subsequently positive and 3191 of those (58.5%) were symptomatic. Protection offered from prior infection was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.6–85.8) and against symptomatic infection was 84.5% (95% CI, 77.9–89.1). This protection increased over time. Conclusions Prior infection in patients with COVID-19 was highly protective against reinfection and symptomatic disease. This protection increased over time, suggesting that viral shedding or ongoing immune response may persist beyond 90 days and may not represent true reinfection. As vaccine supply is limited, patients with known history of COVID-19 could delay early vaccination to allow for the most vulnerable to access the vaccine and slow transmission.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1787-1794
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Whynott ◽  
Karen Summers ◽  
Riley Mickelsen ◽  
Satish Ponnuru ◽  
Joshua A. Broghammer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhou Lv ◽  
Minglu Gu ◽  
Miao Zhou ◽  
Yanfei Mao ◽  
Lai Jiang

Abstract Purpose: Multiple studies have demonstrated an obesity paradox such that obese septic patients have a lower mortality rate and a relatively favorable prognosis. However, less is known on the association between abdominal obesity and short-term mortality in patients with sepsis. We conducted this study to determine whether the obesity-related survival benefit remains among abdominal obese patients.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data derived from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Septic patients (≥18 years) with or without abdominal obesity of first intensive care units (ICU) admission in the database were enrolled. The primary outcome was mortality within 28 days of ICU admission and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess any association between abdominal obesity and the outcome variable.Results: A total of 21534 patients were enrolled finally, the crude 28-day mortality benefit after ICU admission was not observed in patients with abdominal obesity (15.8% vs. 15.3%, p=0.32). In the extended multivariable logistic models, the odds ratio (OR) of abdominal obesity was significantly inversed after incorporating metabolic variables into the logistic model (OR range 1.094-2.872, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis showed interaction effects in impaired fasting blood glucose/diabetes and metabolic syndrome subgroups (P = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). In the subgroups of blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride level, no interaction was detected in the association between abdominal obesity and mortality. After propensity score matching, 6523 pairs of patients were selected. The mortality significantly higher in the abdominal obesity group (17.0% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.015). Notably, the non-abdominal obese patients were weaned off vasopressors and mechanical ventilation more quickly than those in the abdominal obesity group (vasopressor‑free days on day 28 of 27.0 vs. 26.8, p < 0.001; ventilation-free days on day 28 of 26.7 vs. 25.6, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Abdominal obesity was associated with increased risk of adjusted sepsis-related mortality within 28 days after ICU admission and was partially mediated through metabolic syndrome components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document