scholarly journals Response to influenza vaccination in immunocompromised children with rheumatic disease: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Jensen ◽  
Susan Nielsen ◽  
Anne Estmann Christensen ◽  
Freddy Karup Pedersen ◽  
Ramona Trebbien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Haemagglutination Inhibition ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Influenza Viruses ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Influenza Immunization ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Antibody Titres

Abstract Background Prevention of illness due to infection by influenza viruses is important for children with rheumatic diseases. Biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs have become increasingly important in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and combinations of immunosuppressive drugs are used for the treatment of systemic disorders, which increase the risk of secondary immunodeficiency. Therefore, we investigated whether children with rheumatic disease can mount a protective antibody response after influenza immunization. Methods The prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in Denmark during the influenza season 2015–2016. Children with rheumatic disease aged six months to 19 years were eligible. Controls were immunologically healthy children. A blood sample was collected before and after vaccination and analysed by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay for the 2015–2016 influenza vaccine-strains. In case of flu-like symptoms the child was tested for influenza. For statistical analyses the patients were grouped according to medical treatment or disease. Results A total of 226 patients and 15 controls were enrolled. No differences were found for the increase of antibodies from pre-vaccine to post-vaccine between the groups in our primary analyses: A/Cal H1N1pdm09 (p = 0.28), A/Swi H3N2 (p = 0.15) and B/Phu Yamagata (p = 0.08). Only when combining patients across groups a lower increase in antibodies was found compared to controls. Among all patients the pre-vaccine rates for seroprotection using the HI-titer cut-off ≥ 40 were 93.1–97.0 % for all three strains. For seroprotection using the HI-titer cut-off ≥ 110 the pre-vaccine rates for all patients were 14.9–43.6 % for all three strains and an increase in the proportions of patients being seroprotected after vaccination was found for A/Cal H1N1pdm09 and A/Swi H3N2. None of the children with flu-like symptoms tested positive for the vaccine strains. Conclusions Children with rheumatic diseases increase in antibody titres after influenza immunization, however, it remains uncertain whether a protective level is achieved.

scholarly journals SAT0589 RISK FOR PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALIZATION FOLLOWING A RHEUMA-RELATED HOSPITALIZATION: RESULTS FROM A CZECH NATIONWIDE, COHORT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1253.2-1254
Author(s):  
T. Formánek ◽  
K. Mladá ◽  
M. Husakova
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitalization ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Background:Cohort studies using nationwide health registers have shown an increased risk for affective and anxiety disorders in people with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (1-3). Moreover, a nationwide cohort study demonstrated an increased risk for mental disorders in people with rheumatic diseases (4).Objectives:We aimed to investigate the risk for psychiatric hospitalization following a hospitalization for rheumatic disease.Methods:Using data from the Czech nationwide register of all-cause hospitalizations, we obtained 4 971 individuals hospitalized (index hospitalization) between 2004 and 2012 for rheumatic diseases - RA, spondyloarthritis (including AS, psoriatic arthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis), systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerodermia, with no history of psychiatric and rheuma-related hospitalization in the previous 10 years from the index hospitalization. On these individuals, we randomly matched (on age, gender and year of index hospitalization) controls that were hospitalized in the same time period for a non-rheumatic disease and have no history of psychiatric and rheumatic hospitalization in the last 10 years from their index hospitalization, in the ratio of 1:5. We employed conditional logistic regression for assessing the risk for psychiatric hospitalization in the subsequent 3 years from the index hospitalization. To strengthen our results, we repeated the matching step 100 times and run the analysis on each resulting dataset separately, and pooled the results. The findings are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).Results:We identified an elevated risk for psychiatric (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1; 1.78) and for affective disorders (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.17; 4.1) in people hospitalized for rheumatic diseases. We did not find a statistically significant association with organic, psychotic and anxiety disorders.Conclusion:There is an increased risk for experiencing a psychiatric disorder in the period of 3 years after a rheuma-related hospitalization.References:[1]Shen C-C, Hu L-Y, Yang AC, Kuo BI-T, Chiang Y-Y, Tsai S-J. Risk of Psychiatric Disorders following Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Nationwide Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2016;43(3).[2]Park J-S, Jang H-D, Hong J-Y, Park Y-S, Han K, Suh S-W, et al. Impact of ankylosing spondylitis on depression: a nationwide cohort study. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):6736.[3]Hsu C-C, Chen S-C, Liu C-J, Lu T, Shen C-C, Hu Y-W, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk of Bipolar Disorder: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(9).[4]Sundquist K, Li X, Hemminki K, Sundquist J. Subsequent Risk of Hospitalization for Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: A Nationwide Study From Sweden. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008;65(5):501-7.Acknowledgments:Supported by the project (Ministry of Health Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organization 00023728 (Institute of Rheumatology).Disclosure of Interests:Tomáš Formánek: None declared, Karolina Mladá: None declared, Marketa Husakova Speakers bureau: Novartis

scholarly journals The severity of symptoms and outcomes of patients admitted with rheumatic diseases and COVID-19; a prospective cohort study in Iran

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e34-e34
Author(s):  
Mansour Salesi ◽  
Ramin Sami ◽  
Somayeh Haji Ahmadi ◽  
Nilufar Khademi ◽  
Mehrnegar Dehghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Comorbidity Index

Introduction: In severe COVID-19 patients, a pre-inflamatory condition leads to a cytokine storm syndrome. This may signify the need for using immunomodulatory drugs. Patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) are prone to severe infectious diseases. Objectives: Whether the presence of the RD itself or the use of its drugs in patients with COVID-19 increases the severity of symptoms and outcomes remains largely unknown. Patients and Methods: In a prospective cohort study conducted in Khorshid hospital of Isfahan, Iran, 219 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled and divided into two groups of patients with a positive history for RD (n=19) and those without this history (NRD, n=200). The severity of symptoms and outcomes was compared between the groups. Results: Shortness of breath (P=0.001), cough (P=0.019), and weakness (P=0.001) were significantly higher in the RD than the NRD group after, but not before, recovery. All the patients in the RD group had comorbid diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease), the number of which was significantly higher than that of the NRD group (P<0.001). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to predict 10-year survival in patients with multiple comorbidities. It was significantly lower in the RD group as opposed to the NRD group (P<0.001). Logistic regression also showed a non-significantly higher chance of the composite outcome (ICU admission, death status, and intubation status) in the RD group as opposed to the NRD group, both before and after adjustment for confounding factors. However, no difference was found between the RD patient who received corticosteroid as a treatment (RD-CS) and those who did not (RD-NCS). Conclusion: The results showed an increased risk for severe forms of COVID-19 in RD patients. This risk is possibly attributable to a high prevalence of comorbidities in these patients.

scholarly journals Interpretation of responses and protective levels of antibody against attenuated influenza A viruses using single radial haemolysis

1984 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Al-Khayatt ◽  
R. Jennings ◽  
C. W. Potter
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Haemagglutination Inhibition ◽  
Influenza Virus Vaccine ◽  
Influenza Viruses ◽  
Influenza A Viruses ◽  
H1n1 Vaccine ◽  
Antibody Titres ◽  
Attenuated Viruses ◽  
Virus Strains

SummaryAntibody determinations against H3N2 and H1N1 type A influenza viruses were carried out on paired sera obtained from volunteers taking part in influenza virus vaccine studies, using both the haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and single radial haemolysis (SRH) test. Good correlation between the HI and SRH test was found for both H3N2 and H1N1 antibody and the zone area increases corresponding to significant SRH antibody rises determined for both virus strains. In both H3N2 and H1N1 vaccine studies, intranasal infection of the volunteers with live attenuated viruses was involved and by the measurement of HI and SRH antibodies prior to and following infection, levels of antibody equating with protection against the infecting viruses could be estimated. For the HI test the antibody titres associated with 50% protection were 42 for H1N1, and 44 for H3N2 viruses; for the SRH test, 50% protection was associated with zone areas of 20·0–25·0 mm2for both H1N1 and H3N2 viruses.

scholarly journals OP0147 RHEUMATIC? - A DIGITAL DIAGNOSTIC DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR INDIVIDUALS SUSPECTING RHEUMATIC DISEASES: A MULTICENTER VALIDATION STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 87.1-88
Author(s):  
R. Knevel ◽  
J. Knitza ◽  
A. Hensvold ◽  
A. Circiumaru ◽  
T. Bruce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Musculoskeletal Complaints ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Diagnostic Decision ◽  
Ocean Observations ◽  
Receiver Operating

Background:Digital diagnostic decision support tools promise to accelerate diagnosis and increase health care efficiency in rheumatology. Rheumatic? is an online tool developed by specialists in rheumatology and general medicine together with patients and patient organizations for individuals suspecting a rheumatic disease.1,2 The tool can be used by people suspicious for rheumatic diseases resulting in individual advise on eventually seeking further health care.Objectives:We tested Rheumatic? for its ability to differentiate symptoms from immune-mediated diseases from other rheumatic and musculoskeletal complaints and disorders in patients visiting rheumatology clinics.Methods:The performance of Rheumatic? was tested using data from 175 patients from three university rheumatology centers covering two different settings:A.Risk-RA phase setting. Here, we tested whether Rheumatic? could predict the development of arthritis in 50 at risk-individuals with musculoskeletal complaints and anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity from the KI (Karolinska Institutet)B.Early arthritis setting. Here, we tested whether Rheumatic? could predict the development of an immune-mediated rheumatic disease in i) EUMC (Erlangen) n=52 patients and ii) LUMC (Leiden) n=73 patients.In each setting, we examined the discriminative power of the total score with the Wilcoxon rank test and the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).Results:In setting A, the total test score clearly differentiated between individuals developing arthritis or not, median 245 versus 163, P < 0.0001, AUC-ROC = 75.3 (Figure 1). Also within patients with arthritis the Rheumatic? total score was significantly higher in patients developing an immune-mediated arthritic disease versus those who did not: median score EUMC 191 versus 107, P < 0.0001, AUC-ROC = 79.0, and LUMC 262 versus 212, P < 0.0001, AUC-ROC = 53.6.Figure 1.(Area under) the receiver operating curve for the total Rheumatic? scoreConclusion:Rheumatic? is a web-based patient-centered multilingual diagnostic tool capable of differentiating immune-mediated rheumatic conditions from other musculoskeletal problems. A following subject of research is how the tool performs in a population-wide setting.References:[1]Knitza J. et al. Mobile Health in Rheumatology: A Patient Survey Study Exploring Usage, Preferences, Barriers and eHealth Literacy. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020.[2]https://rheumatic.elsa.science/en/Acknowledgements:This project has received funding from EIT Health. EIT Health is supported by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), a body of the European Union that receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program.This project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 777357, RTCure.Disclosure of Interests:Rachel Knevel: None declared, Johannes Knitza: None declared, Aase Hensvold: None declared, Alexandra Circiumaru: None declared, Tor Bruce Employee of: Ocean Observations, Sebastian Evans Employee of: Elsa Science, Tjardo Maarseveen: None declared, Marc Maurits: None declared, Liesbeth Beaart- van de Voorde: None declared, David Simon: None declared, Arnd Kleyer: None declared, Martina Johannesson: None declared, Georg Schett: None declared, Thomas Huizinga: None declared, Sofia Svanteson Employee of: Elsa Science, Alexandra Lindfors Employee of: Ocean Observations, Lars Klareskog: None declared, Anca Catrina: None declared

Midfoot Function Before and After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072199578
Author(s):  
Frank E. DiLiberto ◽  
Steven L. Haddad ◽  
Steven A. Miller ◽  
Anand M. Vora
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Peak Power ◽  
Nonparametric Tests ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Before And After

Background: Information regarding the effect of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) on midfoot function is extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to characterize midfoot region motion and power during walking in people before and after TAA. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 19 patients with end-stage ankle arthritis who received a TAA and 19 healthy control group participants. A motion capture and force plate system was used to record sagittal and transverse plane first metatarsal and lateral forefoot with respect to hindfoot motion, as well as sagittal plane midfoot region positive and negative peak power during walking. Parametric or nonparametric tests to examine differences and equivalence across time were conducted. Comparisons to examine differences between postoperative TAA group and control group foot function were also performed. Results: Involved-limb midfoot function was not different between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative time point in the TAA group (all P ≥ .17). Equivalence testing revealed similarity in all midfoot function variables across time (all P < .05). Decreased first metatarsal and lateral forefoot motion, as well as positive peak power generation, were noted in the TAA group postoperative involved limb in comparison to the control group (all P ≤ .01). Conclusion: The similarity of midfoot function across time, along with differences in midfoot function in comparison to controls, suggests that TAA does not change midfoot deficits by 6 months postoperation. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Correction to: cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents before and after the COVID-19 confinement: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén López-Bueno ◽  
Joaquín Calatayud ◽  
Lars Louis Andersen ◽  
José Casaña ◽  
Yasmín Ezzatvar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Before And After

scholarly journals Temporal trends in severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with rheumatic disease: a cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Jorge ◽  
Kristin M D'Silva ◽  
Andrew Cohen ◽  
Zachary S Wallace ◽  
Natalie McCormick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Temporal Trends

scholarly journals OP0097 LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF CASES IN AN IMMUNODEPRESSED POPULATION BY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 53.2-54
Author(s):  
M. Lisbona Muñoz ◽  
P. León ◽  
G. Lopez Antequera ◽  
E. Rubio-Romero
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Neurological Manifestations ◽  
Biological Dmards ◽  
Parametric Data ◽  
The Impact

Background:Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive bacteria that cause the invasive disease listeriosis. Human clinical syndromes are infrequent, mostly appearing in immunosuppressed individuals, newborns, the elderly, pregnant women, and occasionally healthy patients.Objectives:We describe and analyze Listeria-related demographics and clinical features to determine the predisposing conditions for severe infections in an immunodepressed population by rheumatic diseases.Methods:Descriptive Observational Study. A retrospective analysis of 143 patients were performed affected by listeriosis, with positive isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from blood, treated in the H.U. Virgen del Rocío (Seville- Spain) between 2003-2019. Of them 9 were rheumatic patients. The type of clinical manifestation was analyzed, paying special attention to the characteristics associated with patients with neurological complications or unfavorable outcome (death and / or abortion in pregnant women), immunosuppression (associated with cancer or rheumatic disease) was assessed as independent variables, chronic diseases (Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, dyslipidemia, COPD, Renal Insufficiency and Ischemic Heart Disease) as well as other baseline characteristics of the patient. (age, sex, pregnancy) and their toxic habits (tobacco and alcohol).Results:The sample includes a similar proportion of men (70 cases) and women (73 cases), of all ages. Of the total patients, most (85%) required hospital admission, with a duration median (non-parametric data) of 11 days. 78% of the cases admitted showed a favorable evolution. However, 15.4% resulted in death and 5.6% in abortion. This percentage of abortions represented 29% of the total pregnant women admitted Of all the patients admitted, a third (33%) were immunocompromised, including patiets with cancer (79%) and rheumatic diseases (21%). Include lupus (33%), RA (22%), APs (11%), polymyalgia rheumatica (11%), panuveitis (11%) and ANCA vasculitis MPO specificity (11%). All of them required admission although the majority showed a favorable evolution, except one of the patient. which resulted in death, in which case in addition to lupus he presented with prostate cancer. Regarding the baseline treatment of these patients, 7 underwent treatment with synthetic DMARDs and three with biological DMARDs (1 Adalimumab, 1 Infliximab and 1 Rituximab) As a result of the listeria infection, most of them had fever or digestive symptoms and two of they experienced neurological manifestations (meningoencephalitis) None of these last two (with lupus and RA) had biological DMARDs.Conclusion:Listeriosis is an uncommon but potentially serious infection usually in older people, pregnant women and immunocompromised patients. In our sample, 33% of the patients were immunocompromised. Of the 9 patients. affected by listeria with rheumatic disease we find a death for meningoencephalitis. Given the impact of this infection in immunosuppressed patients should pay attention in our patients with fever and neurological manifestations.Reference:[1]Eleftherios Mylonakis et al. A Case Series and Review of 222 Cases. Medicine 2002; 81: 260-269.[2]Alcoba Lez M et al.Meningitis por Listeria monocytogenes en el adulto en España. Presentación de 10 casos y revisión de la literatura. Rev Clin Esp 2002; 202 (12): 638-643.[3]Eleftherios Mylonakis et al. Central Nervous Sistem Infection with Listeria monocytogenes. 33 Years’ Experience at a General Hospital and Review of 776 Episodes from tha Literature. Medicine 1998; 77: 313-336.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Closing the knowledge gap in pelvic neuroanatomy: assessment of a cadaveric training program

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioana Marcu ◽  
Adrian Balica ◽  
Jeffrey A. Gavard ◽  
Eugen C. Campian ◽  
Gustavo Leme Fernandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Knowledge Test ◽  
Educational Facility ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Baseline Knowledge ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level Of Training ◽  
Dissection Method

Abstract Background The objective of this study is to characterize participants in a laparoscopic cadaveric neuroanatomy course and assess knowledge of pelvic neuroanatomy before and after this course. Methods This is a survey-based cohort study with a setting in a university educational facility. The participants are surgeons in a multiday laparoscopic cadaveric pelvic neuroanatomy course. Participants completed a precourse survey, including demographics and comfort with laparoscopic surgery. They then completed an identical precourse and postcourse anatomic knowledge test. Main outcomes are scores on the anatomic knowledge test precourse and postcourse. Results 44 respondents were included: 25 completed fellowship, 15 completed residency, 2 were residents, and 2 were fellows. Participants were on average 11.09 years post training, with an average of 8.67 years from training if they completed fellowship and 18.62 years if they completed residency only. 22 of 42 respondents strongly agreed or agreed they are comfortable performing complex laparoscopic hysterectomies. The average precourse score was 32.18/50 points and the mean difference score (MDS, defined as mean of Postcourse scores minus Precourse scores) was 9.80, showing significant improvement (p <  0.001). Precourse and MDS scores were not significantly different when comparing country of practice, level of training, or time since training. Conclusion Baseline knowledge of pelvic neuroanatomy was similar among groups when comparing fellowship status, place of training, or time since training. There was significant improvement in knowledge after training in this dissection method. This course garnered interest from surgeons with broad training backgrounds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document