scholarly journals Classifying maternal deaths in Suriname using WHO ICD-MM: different interpretation by Physicians, National and International Maternal Death Review Committees

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachmi R. Kodan ◽  
Kim J. C. Verschueren ◽  
Affette M. McCaw-Binns ◽  
Ray Tjon Kon Fat ◽  
Joyce L. Browne ◽  
...  

Abstract Plain English summary The World Health Organization (WHO) provides a framework (ICD-MM) to classify pregnancy-related deaths systematically, which enables global comparison among countries. We compared the classification of pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname by the attending physician and by the national maternal death review (MDR) committee and among the MDR committees of Suriname, Jamaica and the Netherlands. There were 89 possible pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname between 2010 and 2014. Nearly half (47%) were classified differently by the Surinamese MDR committee as compared to the classification of the attending physicians. All three MDR committees agreed that 18% (n = 16/89) of the cases were no maternal deaths. Out of the remaining 73 cases, there was disagreement regarding whether 15% (n = 11) were maternal deaths. The Surinamese and Jamaican MDR committees achieved greater consensus in classification than the Surinamese and the Netherlands MDR committees. The Netherlands MDR committee classified more deaths as unspecified than Surinamese and the Jamaican MDR committees. Underlying causes that achieved a high level of agreement among the three committees were abortive outcomes and obstetric hemorrhage, while little agreement was reported for unspecified and other direct causes. The issues encountered during maternal death classification using the ICD-MM guidelines included classification of suicide during early pregnancy; when to assume pregnancy without objective evidence; how to count maternal deaths occurring outside the country of residence; the relevance of direct or indirect cause attribution; and how to select the underlying cause when direct and indirect conditions or multiple comorbidities co-occur. Addressing these classification barriers in future revisions of the ICD-MM guidelines could enhance the feasibility of maternal death classification and facilitate global comparison. Background Insight into the underlying causes of pregnancy-related deaths is essential to develop policies to avert preventable deaths. The WHO International Classification of Diseases-Maternal Mortality (ICD-MM) guidelines provide a framework to standardize maternal death classifications and enable comparison in and among countries over time. However, despite the implementation of these guidelines, differences in classification remain. We evaluated consensus on maternal death classification using the ICD-MM guidelines. Methods The classification of pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname during 2010–2014 was compared in the country (between the attending physician and the national maternal death review (MDR) committee), and among the MDR committees from Suriname, Jamaica and the Netherlands. All reviewers applied the ICD-MM guidelines. The inter-rater reliability (Fleiss kappa [κ]) was used to measure agreement. Results Out of the 89 cases certified by attending physicians, 47% (n = 42) were classified differently by the Surinamese MDR committee. The three MDR committees agreed that 18% (n = 16/89) of these cases were no maternal deaths, and, therefore, excluded from further analyses. However, opinions differed whether 15% (n = 11) of the remaining 73 cases were maternal deaths. The MDR committees achieved moderate agreement classifying the deaths into type (direct, indirect and unspecified) (κ = 0.53) and underlying cause group (κ = 0.52). The Netherlands MDR committee classified more maternal deaths as unspecified (19%), than the Jamaican (7%) and Surinamese (4%) committees did. The mutual agreement between the Surinamese and Jamaican MDR committees (κ = 0.69 vs κ = 0.63) was better than between the Surinamese and the Netherlands MDR committees (κ = 0.48 vs κ = 0.49) for classification into type and underlying cause group, respectively. Agreement on the underlying cause category was excellent for abortive outcomes (κ = 0.85) and obstetric hemorrhage (κ = 0.74) and fair for unspecified (κ = 0.29) and other direct causes (κ = 0.32). Conclusions Maternal death classification differs in Suriname and among MDR committees from different countries, despite using the ICD-MM guidelines on similar cases. Specific challenges in applying these guidelines included attribution of underlying cause when comorbidities occurred, the inclusion of deaths from suicides, and maternal deaths that occurred outside the country of residence.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachmi Kodan ◽  
Kim J.C. Verschueren ◽  
Affette M. McCaw-Binns ◽  
Ray Tjon Kon Fat ◽  
Joyce L. Browne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Insight into the underlying causes of pregnancy-related deaths is essential to develop policies to avert preventable deaths. The WHO International Classification of Diseases-Maternal Mortality (ICD-MM) guidelines provide a framework to standardize maternal death classifications and enable comparison in and among countries over time. However, despite the implementation of these guidelines, differences in classification remain. We evaluated consensus on maternal death classification using the ICD-MM guidelines. Methods The classification of pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname during 2010-2014 was compared in the country (between the attending physician and the national maternal death review (MDR) committee), and among the MDR committees from Suriname, Jamaica and the Netherlands. All reviewers applied the ICD-MM guidelines. The inter-rater reliability (Fleiss kappa [κ]) was used to measure agreement.Results Out of the 89 cases certified by attending physicians, 47% (n=42) were classified differently by the Surinamese MDR committee. The three MDR committees agreed that 18% (n=16/89) of these cases were no maternal deaths, and, therefore, excluded from further analyses. However, opinions differed whether 15% (n=11) of the remaining 73 cases were maternal deaths. The MDR committees achieved moderate agreement classifying the deaths into type (direct, indirect and unspecified) (κ=0.53) and underlying cause group (κ=0.52). The Netherlands MDR committee classified more maternal deaths as unspecified (19%), than the Jamaican (7%) and Surinamese (4%) committees did. The mutual agreement between the Surinamese and Jamaican MDR committees (κ=0.69 vs κ=0.63) was better than between the Surinamese and the Netherlands MDR committees (κ=0.48 vs κ=0.49) for classification into type and underlying cause group, respectively. Agreement on the underlying cause category was excellent for abortive outcomes (κ=0.85) and obstetric hemorrhage (κ=0.74) and fair for unspecified (κ=0.29) and other direct causes (κ=0.32). Conclusions Maternal death classification differs in Suriname and among MDR committees from different countries, despite using the ICD-MM guidelines on similar cases. Specific challenges in applying these guidelines included attribution of underlying cause when comorbidities occurred, the inclusion of deaths from suicides, and maternal deaths that occurred outside the country of residence.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachmi Kodan ◽  
Kim J.C. Verschueren ◽  
Affette M. McCaw-Binns ◽  
Ray Tjon Kon Fat ◽  
Joyce L. Browne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Insight into the underlying causes of pregnancy-related deaths is essential to develop policies to avert preventable deaths. The WHO International Classification of Diseases-Maternal Mortality (ICD-MM) guidelines provide a framework for uniform classifications which enables comparison within and between countries and over time. However, despite using the guidelines, differences in classifying pregnancy-related deaths within and among countries remain. We evaluated consensus on maternal death classification using ICD-MM.Methods: Classification of the 2010-2014 pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname were compared (1) between the attending physician (death certificate/medical record) and the national maternal death review (MDR) committee; and (2) between MDR committees from Suriname, Jamaica and the Netherlands. All reviewers applied ICD-MM. The inter-rater reliability (Fleiss kappa [κ]) was used to measure agreement.Results: Nearly half (n=42) of the 89 cases reviewed by the Surinamese MDR committee were classified differently by the attending physicians. There was consensus among the three committees that 16 (18%) possible pregnancy-related deaths were not maternal, with opinions differing on 11 (15%, n=73) maternal deaths. Classification agreement into direct, indirect or unspecified (κ=0.53) and underlying cause attribution (κ=0.52) was moderate. The Dutch committee classified more maternal deaths as unspecified (19%), than the Jamaican (7%) and Surinamese MDR committees (4%). The Surinamese and Jamaican committees achieved better mutual agreement (κ=0.69) than Surinamese and the Dutch committees (κ=0.48). Agreement on the underlying cause category was best for abortive outcomes (κ=0.85) and obstetric hemorrhage (κ=0.74) and worst for unspecified (κ=0.29) and other direct causes (κ=0.32). Conclusions: Maternal death classification differs within Suriname and among MDR committees from different countries. Specific challenges applying ICD-MM included attribution of underlying cause when co-morbidities occur, inclusion of suicides, and maternal deaths occurring outside the country of residence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratnasari D. Cahyanti ◽  
Widyawati Widyawati ◽  
Mohammad Hakimi

Abstract Background Maternal Death Reviews (MDR) can assist in formulating prevention strategies to reduce maternal mortality. To support MDR, an adequate MDR instrument is required to accurately identify the underlying causes of maternal deaths. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the reliability of maternal death instruments for conducting the MDR process. Method Three databases: PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO were systematically searched to identify related research articles published between January 2004 and July 2019. The review and meta-analysis involved identification of measurement tools to conduct MDR in all or part of maternal audit. Eligibiliy and quality of studies were evaluated using the Modified Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) Checklist: Reliability Studies. Results Overall, 242 articles were identified. Six articles examining the instrument used for MDR in 4 countries (4 articles on verbal autopsy (VA) and 2 articles on facility-based MDR) were included. None of studies identified reliability in evaluation instruments assessing maternal audit cycle as a comprehensive approach. The pooled kappa for the MDR instruments was 0.72 (95%CI:0.43–0.99; p < 0.001) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 96.19%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of MDR instruments showed pooled kappa in VA of 0.89 (95%CI:0.52–1.25) and facility-based MDR of 0.48 (95%CI:0.15–0.82). Meta-regression analysis tended to show the high heterogeneity was likely associated with sample sizes, regions, and year of publications. Conclusions The MDR instruments appear feasible. Variation of the instruments suggest the need for judicious selection of MDR instruments by considering the study population and assessment during the target periods.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachmi R. Kodan ◽  
Kim J.C. Verschueren ◽  
Geertje E. Boerstra ◽  
Inder Gajadien ◽  
Robert S. Mohamed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) is essential in preventing avoidable maternal deaths. The cycle starts by accurately capturing maternal deaths with a surveillance system, followed by an audit to give insight into the underlying causes and "lessons learned." Subsequently, recommendations are formulated and targeted multisectoral responses such as quality of care improvement strategies, including clinical guidelines update, health promotion interventions, research to fulfill knowledge gaps, enabling policies and legislation and interventions addressing social determinants. Finally, continuous evaluation and monitoring close the MDSR cycle. We aim to describe the MDSR implementation process in Suriname to share valuable lessons with other countries.Methods We provide an overview of the evolvement from improved maternal death surveillance, toward review, response, and monitoring to fulfill the MDSR cycle in Suriname. Findings Middle-income country Suriname called for many years for improved surveillance and review, and in 2000 the first action was commenced by extension of maternal death case capturing from death certificates to active hospital surveillance. Consequently, the maternal mortality ratio increased in the following years. However, not the full MDSR cycle was completed in 2015, and local health care providers initiated the next step of the MDSR cycle with the installation of a national maternal death review committee (MaMS). Since then, the committee reviews each maternal death applying the "no blame, no shame" culture, formulates, and disseminates recommendations. Collaboration with the Ministry of Health (MOH), Bureau of Public Health (BOG), and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) should ensure progress to the sustainable implementation of MDSR. Committee MaMS demonstrates that maternal death review and recommended high impact interventions can only be effectively implemented and sustained, through strong professional and government commitment and practical, solution-oriented responses. Conclusions Crucial elements for a successful MDSR implementation are Commitment, "no blame, no shame" Culture, Coordination, Collaboration, and Communication (5 C's).We hope that describing this process toward successful nationwide MDSR implementation, with its facilitators and barriers, is helpful for other countries with similar ambitions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Said ◽  
Mats Malqvist ◽  
Andrea B. Pembe ◽  
Siriel Massawe ◽  
Claudia Hanson

Abstract Background To reduce maternal mortality Tanzania introduced Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) system in 2015 as recommended by World Health Organization (WHO). All health facilities are to notify and review all maternal deaths inorder to recommend quality improvement actions to reduce deaths in future. The system relies on consistent and correct categorization of causes of maternal deaths and three phases of delays. To assess its adequacy we compared the routine MDSR categorization of causes of death and three phases of delays to those assigned by an independent expert panel with additional information from Verbal Autopsy (VA). Methods Our cross-sectional study included 109 reviewed maternal deaths from two regions in Tanzania for the year 2018. We abstracted the underlying medical causes of death and the three phases of delays from MDSR system records. We interviewed bereaved families using the standard WHO VA questionnaire. The obstetrician expert panel assigned underlying causes of death based on information from medical files and VA according to International Classification of Disease to Death in Pregnancy Childbirth and Puerperium (ICD-MM).They assigned causes to nine ICD-MM groups and identified the three phases of delays. We used Cohen`s K statistic to compare causes of deaths and delays categorization.Results Comparison of underlying causes was done for 99 deaths. While 109 and 84 deaths for expert panel and MDSR respectively were analyzed for delays because of missing data in MDSR system. Expert panel and MDSR system assigned the same underlying causes in 64(64.6%) deaths (K statistic 0.60). Agreement increased in 80(80.8%) when causes were assigned by ICD-MM groups (K statistic 0.76). The obstetrician expert panel identified phase one delays in 74(67.9%), phase two in 24(22.0%) and phase three delays in all 101(100%) deaths that were assessed for this delay while MDSR system identified delays in 42(50.0%), 10(11.9%) and 78(92.9%).The expert panel found human errors in management in 94(93.1%) while MDSR system reported in 53(67.9%) deaths.Conclusions MDSR committees performed reasonably well in assigning underlying causes of death. The obstetrician expert panel found more delays than reported in MDSR system indicating difficulties within MDSR teams to critically review deaths.


1970 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawshan Ara Khanam ◽  
Mahbuba Khan ◽  
M Abdul Halim ◽  
Kohinoor Begum ◽  
Sultana Jahan

Objective: This study was conducted to develop a system of maternal death review in hospital of each level and in the community with a system of giving feedback and to take corrective action from the central level to periphery.Methods: It was a descriptive study with a cross sectional design. Study area were - 2 medical college hospitals, 4 district hospitals, 4 Upazilla hospitals and 12 unions. Study period was January 2007 to November 2007. The number of maternal death has occurred in that selected sites during the survey period was the sample size. Maternal death review committee has been formed at each hospital. In addition, OGSB Technical committee and National Technical committee had also been formed. To collect the information about the deceased in detail a structured pre-tested quetionairre has been used. In the community - community skilled birth attendants were assigned for collecting the data. In hospitals assigned persons were doctors working in Obstetrics & Gynaecology departments.Result: During the project period 101 maternal deaths were reported. One mother brought dead. So, she was excluded from the study. Among others, 97 forms were filled properly. Almost all (95%) mothers were housewife, 55% were primi gravida, 90% woman died within 3 hours of admission, 77% were critically ill during admission. PIH is the major killer (40%), next is haemorrhage (38%).Conclusion: Maternal death review provided information about the situation of care provided at hospitals of different level. This uncovered the causes of maternal deaths and identified the laps and gaps in the health care system. DOI: 10.3329/bjog.v24i1.6322 Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009; Vol. 24(1) : 18-21  


Author(s):  
Anju R. Ekka ◽  
Sangeeta R. Jogi

Background: Sustainable development goal 3 (SDG 3) includes an ambitious target of reducing the global maternal mortality rate (MMR) to less than 70 per 100 000 births by 2030. To reach this target, countries need an accurate picture of the levels and causes of maternal deaths. A standardization of the cause of death attribution will improve interpretation of data on maternal mortality, analysis on the causes of maternal death, and allocation of resources and programmes intended to address maternal mortality. International classification of diseases-maternal mortality (ICD-MM) has proven to be easily applicable and helps clarify the cause of maternal death.Methods: Retrospective study of 142 maternal death cases was done in a tertiary medical centre (medical college) from December 2017 to November 2020 for determining the causes of maternal death and their classification according to ICD-MM.Results: Direct causes of maternal deaths were observed in 82.39% cases whereas indirect causes were present in remaining 17.61% cases. Hypertensive disorders (35.92%), obstetric haemorrhage (26.06%) and pregnancy related infection (14.79%) constituted the major groups of direct cause of maternal deaths whereas anaemia was the most common indirect cause (7.75%).Conclusions: Hypertensive disorders (35.92%), obstetric haemorrhage (26.06%) and pregnancy related infection (14.79%) were the major causes of direct obstetric death and anaemia (7.75%) was the most common cause of indirect obstetric death. All of these causes are preventable with targeted interventions. Reducing maternal mortality is one of the key targets within the SDG and ICD-MM is a valuable tool for uniform and standard classification of maternal deaths as well as for developing strategies for reducing maternal death. Training on cause of death certification, maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) documentation and use of ICD is essential to enable consistent application of ICD coding and improve data collection and analysis.


Author(s):  
Tosha M. Sheth ◽  
Palak P. Vaishnav ◽  
Nandita K. Maitra

Background: The World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2012 introduced the 10th revision of International Classification of Disease (ICD 10) to deaths in pregnancy, labour and puerperium (ICD-MM) for consistent collection, analysis and interpretation of information on maternal deaths. The proper use of this classification requires training to avoid heterogeneity and error in the classification of maternal deaths.Methods: We analysed the Maternal Death Review (MDR) forms of 295 deaths over a period of 5 years (January 2014 to December 2018 inclusive) occurring at a tertiary health centre in Western India. The ICD-MM classification was used to reassign the cause of death.Results: There were 295 deaths in women during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium during the 5 year period. Of these there were 294 maternal deaths and one coincidental death. There were 173 deaths of the direct type (58.84%), 105 deaths of the indirect type (35.71%) and 16 deaths (5.44%) of the unspecified type. Obstetric haemorrhage was  the highest contributor to direct deaths (23.8%) and anaemia contributed to the maximum deaths from indirect causes (13.6%) followed by liver diseases in pregnancy (10.54%).Unanticipated complications of management accounted for 2% of the total deaths. There was considerable inaccuracy in assigning cause of death by consultants who were untrained in the use of the ICD-MM classification.Conclusions: ICD-MM classification promotes an accurate assignment of the cause of death. Training of healthcare providers performing maternal death reviews in the use of this classification is essential to identify accurate underlying cause of death and contributory conditions. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 342-353
Author(s):  
Carlos Cabrera ◽  
◽  
Jeiv Gómez ◽  
Pedro Faneite ◽  
Ofelia Uzcátegui

Objective: To analyze maternal mortality in the Maternidad “Concepción Palacios” Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020. Methods: A descriptive, analytical, and retrospective study of maternal deaths occurred in the 2013-2018 period was carried out. Results: There were 73 maternal deaths, and a ratio of 135.96 per 100,000 live births. Direct maternal deaths were 60, 82.19% of the population and 13 indirect maternal deaths, 17.80%. The causes of direct maternal death were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 48.33%, sepsis 26.66%, and obstetric hemorrhage 23.33%, with a 1: 3 ratios of maternal deaths at extreme ages of reproductive life. Conclusions: The maternal death ratio in the Maternidad “Concepción Palacios” Hospital duplicates the goals of the sustainable development goals of the 2016-2030 agenda; there is an increase in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy as a direct cause of maternal mortality. Primiparity, the absence or lack of data from prenatal control, cesarean sections, and admission-death time of less than 24 hours prevailed. Recommendations: Advances are needed in sexual and reproductive health education, education and training of health personnel in extreme maternal morbidity, analysis by theoretical premises identifying the social determinants of maternal mortality and the health reality related to its management, implementing preventive public policies with specific care guidelines. Keywords: Maternal mortality, Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Maternal sepsis, Obstetric hemorrhage.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratnasari Dwi Cahyanti ◽  
Widyawati Widyawati ◽  
Mohammad Hakimi

Abstract Background: Maternal Death Reviews (MDR) can assist in formulating prevention strategies to reduce maternal mortality. To support MDR, an adequate MDR instrument is required to accurately identify the underlying causes of maternal deaths. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the reliability of maternal death instruments for conducting the MDR process.Method: Three databases: PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO were systematically searched to identify related research articles published between January 2005 and July 2019. The review and meta-analysis involved identification of measurement tools to conduct MDR in all or part of maternal audit. Eligibiliy and quality of studies were evaluated using the Modified Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) Checklist: Reliability Studies.Results: Overall, 242 articles were retrieved and 17 articles were selected for full-text review. Six articles examined the instrument used for MDR in 4 countries consisting of 4 articles on verbal autopsy (VA) and 2 articles on facility-based MDR. None of studies identified reliability in evaluation instruments assessing maternal audit cycle as a comprehensive approach. The pooled kappa for the MDR instruments was 0.72 (95%CI:0.43-0.99; p<0.001) with considerable heterogeneity (I²=96.19%; p<0.001). Subgroup analysis of MDR instruments showed pooled kappa in VA of 0.89 (95%CI:0.52-1.25) and facility-based MDR of 0.48 (95%CI:0.15-0.82). Meta-regression analysis tended to show the high heterogeneity was likely associated with sample sizes, regions, and year of publications.Conclusions: The MDR instruments appear feasible. Variation of the instruments suggest the need for judicious selection of MDR instruments by considering the study population and assessment during the target periods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document