scholarly journals Antithrombotic drugs do not increase intraoperative blood loss in emergency gastrointestinal surgery: a single-institution propensity score analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Matsuoka ◽  
Kenji Kobayashi ◽  
Alan Kawarai Lefor ◽  
Junichi Sasaki ◽  
Hiroharu Shinozaki
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Drug Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Antithrombotic Drugs ◽  
Antithrombotic Drug ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Abstract Background The use of antithrombotic drugs is increasing with the aging population. Prior to elective procedures, antithrombotic drugs are often discontinued. For emergency procedures in patients taking antithrombotic drugs, their effect cannot be attenuated which may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhagic events. However, there are few studies showing increased intraoperative blood loss in patients taking antithrombotic drugs who undergo emergency gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of antithrombotic agents increases intraoperative blood loss in emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery between January 2013 and December 2017 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was intraoperative blood loss. Patients were divided into the antithrombotic drug group and a control group, and a propensity score was developed using multivariate logistic regression. We use 1:1 propensity score matching analysis to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results Of 1555 patients included in this study, 1184 patients, including 170 patients taking antithrombotic drugs, were eligible for propensity score matching analysis. A 1:1 matching yielded 117 well-balanced pairs. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (antithrombotic drug group vs control group, median (interquartile): 60 (225–10) vs 100 (243–10) ml, p = 0.43). Conclusions This study suggests that antithrombotic drugs do not increase intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Emergency gastrointestinal surgery for patients currently taking antithrombotic drugs can be performed safely, and the use of antithrombotic drugs is not a reason to delay surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Placenta previa with posterior extrauterine adhesion: clinical features and management practice

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Nagase ◽  
Shinya Matsuzaki ◽  
Masayuki Endo ◽  
Takeya Hara ◽  
Aiko Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding

Abstract Background A diagnostic sign on magnetic resonance imaging, suggestive of posterior extrauterine adhesion (PEUA), was identified in patients with placenta previa. However, the clinical features or surgical outcomes of patients with placenta previa and PEUA are unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of placenta previa with PEUA and determine whether an altered management strategy improved surgical outcomes. Methods This single institution retrospective study examined patients with placenta previa who underwent cesarean delivery between 2014 and 2019. In June 2017, we recognized that PEUA was associated with increased intraoperative bleeding; thus, we altered the management of patients with placenta previa and PEUA. To assess the relationship between changes in practice and surgical outcomes, a quasi-experimental method was used to examine the difference-in-difference before (pre group) and after (post group) the changes. Surgical management was modified as follows: (i) minimization of uterine exteriorization and adhesion detachment during cesarean delivery and (ii) use of Nelaton catheters for guiding cervical passage during Bakri balloon insertion. To account for patient characteristics, propensity score matching and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Results The study cohort (n = 141) comprised of 24 patients with placenta previa and PEUA (PEUA group) and 117 non-PEUA patients (control group). The PEUA patients were further categorized into the pre (n = 12) and post groups (n = 12) based on the changes in surgical management. Total placenta previa and posterior placentas were more likely in the PEUA group than in the control group (66.7% versus 42.7% [P = 0.04] and 95.8% versus 63.2% [P < 0.01], respectively). After propensity score matching (n = 72), intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the PEUA group (n = 24) than in the control group (n = 48) (1515 mL versus 870 mL, P < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that PEUA was a significant risk factor for intraoperative bleeding before changes were implemented in practice (t = 2.46, P = 0.02). Intraoperative blood loss in the post group was successfully reduced, as opposed to in the pre group (1180 mL versus 1827 mL, P = 0.04). Conclusions PEUA was associated with total placenta previa, posterior placenta, and increased intraoperative bleeding in patients with placenta previa. Our altered management could reduce the intraoperative blood loss.

scholarly journals Antithrombotic drugs have a minimal effect on intraoperative blood loss during emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Matsuoka ◽  
Nao Ichihara ◽  
Hiroharu Shinozaki ◽  
Kenji Kobayashi ◽  
Alan Kawarai Lefor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Antithrombotic Drugs ◽  
Generalized Peritonitis ◽  
Blood Loss Volume

Abstract Background The effect of antithrombotic drugs on intraoperative operative blood loss volume in patients undergoing emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of antithrombotic drugs on intraoperative blood loss in patients with generalized peritonitis using a nationwide surgical registry in Japan. Method This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide surgical registry data from 2011 to 2017 in Japan. Propensity score matching for the use of antithrombotic drugs was used for the adjustment of age, gender, comorbidities, frailty, preoperative state, types of surgery, surgical approach, laboratory data, and others. The main outcome was intraoperative blood loss: comparison of intraoperative blood loss, ratio of intraoperative blood loss after adjusted for confounding factors, and variable importance of all covariates. Results A total of 70,105 of the eligible 75,666 patients were included in this study, and 2947 patients were taking antithrombotic drugs. Propensity score matching yielded 2864 well-balanced pairs. The blood loss volume was slightly higher in the antithrombotic drug group (100 [10–349] vs 70 [10–299] ml). After adjustment for confounding factors, the use of antithrombotic drugs was related to a 1.30-fold increase in intraoperative blood loss compared to non-use of antithrombotic drugs (95% CI, 1.16–1.45). The variable importance revealed that the effect of the use of antithrombotic drugs was minimal compared with surgical approach or type of surgery. Conclusion This study shows that while taking antithrombotic drugs is associated with a slight increase in intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis, the effect is likely of minimal clinical significance.

scholarly journals Bicyclol for the treatment of drug-induced liver injury: a propensity score matching analysis using a nationwide inpatient database

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110059
Author(s):  
Yongfeng Wang ◽  
Rongtao Lai ◽  
Peilan Zong ◽  
Qingling Xu ◽  
Jia Shang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Drug Induced Liver Injury ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bicyclol in patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) using a nationwide database.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of DILI patients in the DILI-R database. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the bicyclol and control groups, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) recovery was compared between the two groups. Factors associated with ALT recovery and safety were identified.ResultsThe analysis included the data of 25,927 patients. Eighty-seven cases were included in the bicyclol group, with 932 cases in the control group. One-to-one propensity score matching created 86 matched pairs. The ALT normalization rate in the bicyclol group was significantly higher than that in the control group (50.00% vs. 24.42%), and statistical significance was found in the superiority test. After adjustment of baseline ALT levels, baseline total bilirubin levels, sex, age, acute or chronic liver diseases, and suspected drugs in the multivariate logic regression analysis, the major influencing factors for ALT recovery included the time interval between ALT tests (days) and the group factor (bicyclol treatment). There were no differences in the proportion of renal function impairment or blood abnormalities between the two groups.ConclusionsBicyclol is a potential candidate for DILI.

scholarly journals Reducing Morbidity in Urgent Gastroenterologic Surgery; Propensity Score Analysis Using Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Sutures

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Takeno ◽  
Kanefumi Yamashita ◽  
Tomoaki Noritomi ◽  
Seichiro Hoshino ◽  
Yasushi Yamauchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Abdominal Closure

Superficial surgical site infections (S-SSIs), which prolonged hospital stay and increased costs, are a critical problem. The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk factors for S-SSIs after urgent gastroenterologic surgery and what surgeons can do to reduce their incidence and to shorten the hospital stay. A total of 275 patients who underwent urgent gastroenterologic surgery were enrolled in the present study. The correlations between the incidence of S-SSIs and clinicopathologic factors were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score matching. Of 275 cases, 43 (15.6%) patients had an S-SSI. On univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with a significantly higher incidence of S-SSI: American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = 0.043); wound classification (P = 0.0005); peritonitis (P = 0.019); prolonged operation time (P = 0.0001); increased blood loss (P = 0.019); transfusion (P = 0.0047); and abdominal closure without triclosan-coated polydioxanone sutures (P = 0.042). However, a propensity score–matching analysis showed that abdominal closure using triclosan-coated polydioxanone sutures did not reduce the incidence of S-SSIs in patients who underwent urgent gastroenterologic surgery (P = 0.20), but it tended to be associated with a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.082). To reduce morbidity after urgent gastroenterologic surgery, surgeons should shorten the operation time and decrease the blood loss. In addition, abdominal closure using triclosan-coated polydioxanone sutures alone could not reduce the incidence of S-SSIs but might shorten the hospital stay after urgent gastroenterologic surgery by inhibiting bacterial activity and preventing prolongation of the infections.

Outcomes of Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: A Case-Control Study with Propensity Score Matching

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shogo Tanaka ◽  
Shigekazu Takemura ◽  
Hiroji Shinkawa ◽  
Takayoshi Nishioka ◽  
Genya Hamano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Laparoscopic Hepatic Resection ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Background/Purpose: Laparoscopic hepatic resection (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has gradually gained ground as a safe and minimally invasive treatment, although LH for cirrhotic patients remains challenging. Methods: Between January 2007 and August 2014, 28 and 57 patients with histologically proven cirrhosis (histological activity index, fibrosis score 4) underwent pure LH and open hepatic resection (OH; less than segmentectomy), respectively, for peripheral HCC ≤5 cm. To correct the difference in clinicopathological factors, including difficulty scores, between the two groups, propensity score matching was used at a 1:1 ratio, which resulted in a comparison of 20 patients per group. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of LH and OH to investigate the efficacy of LH. Results: Clinicopathological variables, including difficulty scores, were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of complications and mean intraoperative blood loss were lower in the LH group than the OH group (0 vs. 45% and 180 vs. 440 ml, p = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 42% in the LH group and 30% in the OH group (p = 0.533), whereas the 5-year overall survival rates were 46 and 60%, respectively (p = 0.606). Conclusions: LH is a safe and effective treatment option for cirrhotic patients with HCC in terms of intraoperative blood loss and morbidity.

scholarly journals CLASSICAL MONOPOLAR RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION IN TREATMENT OF LONG-Standing persistent Atrial FIBRILLATION: PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
A. V. Evtushenko ◽  
V. V. Evtushenko ◽  
E. N. Pavlyukova ◽  
I. O. Kurlov ◽  
V. Kh. Vaizov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

The article is devoted to the evaluation of the results of clinical application of penetrating radiofrequency ablation techniques on atrial myocardium.Material and Methods. A total of 298 patients with valvular heart disease complicated with atrial fibrillation were operated. All operations were performed under cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia. The main group consisted of 198 patients who were operated using penetrating technique radiofrequency exposure. The control group consisted of 100 patients who underwent surgery with the use of «classical» monopolar radiofrequency-ablation technique. Both groups did not significantly differ in any parameter before surgery, but to increase confidence in the results, pseudo-randomization was performed using the Propensity score matching technique.Results. Patients with previous heart surgery were excluded during the selection of candidates for the procedure because of the presence of adhesions in the pericardium that did not allow good visualization of the left atrium, sufficient to perform the procedure. Penetrating technique had significantly higher efficiency compared to the «classic» technique in the early and long-term postoperative periods. The efficiency was 93% in the early postoperative period and 88% in the long term. The efficacy of «classical» monopolar procedure was lower: 86 and 68%, respectively.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Treatment Outcome Between Primary Intratympanic Steroid and Salvage Intratympanic Steroid Protocol in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 252-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Won Seo ◽  
Ha Na Lee ◽  
Hyun Woong Jun ◽  
Hayoung Byun ◽  
Jae Ho Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Steroid ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
And Control

Background and Objectives We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of primary intratympanic steroid (ITS) and the salvage ITS protocol.Subjects and Method We assessed 440 patients with unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) from January 2016 to December 2019. Of the 440 patients, 37 patients received ITS only as a primary treatment while other patients received systemic steroid; of those remaining patients, 276 received systemic steroid as well as ITS as a salvage treatment. We performed a 1:2 propensity score matching analysis for both groups using parameters such as the initial hearing level, presence of vertigo, onset of treatment, age, sex, hypertension and diabetes. The rate of hearing recovery was determinied by comparing the matching propensity score between the primary ITS and the control group according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guideline and Siegel’s criteria.Results Of the 440 ISSNHL patients, 28.9% received systemic steroid only and 62.6% of patients were managed with systemic steroid plus salvage ITS. Thirty-seven patients (8.4%) were managed with ITS only. While 36.8% of patients completely recovered, 35.0% did not recover their hearing according to AAO-HNS guideline. The propensity score matching showed that the initial hearing level, age and onset of treatment were not significantly different between the primary ITS and control group. Regarding the treatment outcome, complete recovery rate for the primary ITS group and control group were 29.7% and 33.8%, respectively. Although the recovery rate of the salvage ITS protocol group was higher than that of the primary ITS group, statistical significance was not identified.Conclusion Treatment strategies of primary ITS and salvage ITS protocol did not significantly affect the clinical outcomes of ISSNHL differently.

scholarly journals The outcomes of multivisceral resection for primary T4b colorectal cancer in a tertiary referral center: A propensity score matching analysis.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Maryńczak ◽  
Przemysław Gajewski ◽  
Marcin Włodarczyk ◽  
Radzisław Trzciński ◽  
Michal Mik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Multivisceral Resection ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

IntroductionA multivisceral resection (MVR) is often necessary for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) as the tumor must be removed en bloc with the infiltrated tissues. The outcomes of MVR are variably presented in the literature. This study aimed to analyze mortality and morbidity of MVR in patients with CRC.Material and methodsThis retrospective study was performed using the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery database of 2204 patients operated on for CRC. Patients with MVR due to stage pT4b primary CRC were the study group. Patients with no sign of intraoperative infiltration into contiguous structures who had undergone a traditional resection qualified for the control group. Mortality and morbidity for both groups were compared using a propensity score matching analysis.ResultsPatients with no sign of intraoperative infiltration into contiguous structures who had undergone a traditional resection qualified for the control group, while 117 patients with MVR due to stage pT4b primary CRC were included in the study group. Early post-operative mortality was not significantly increased in the MVR (3.4%vs.1.4%;p=0.284). The mean operative time was significantly longer in the MVR (p<0.001). The five-year absolute survival rate was significantly higher in the MVR group (76.7%) than in control (57.0%;p=0.004).ConclusionsMVR in pT4 CRC is not linked to a higher risk of significant post-operative complications compared to standard resections. Patients with CRC with involvement of contiguous structures who undergo an MVR do not appear to have worse long-time outcome than those who do not have involvement of contiguous structures.

scholarly journals Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Therapy in a Single General Hospital: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Abe ◽  
Katsunori Ami ◽  
Akira Katsuno ◽  
Noriyasu Tamura ◽  
Toshiko Harada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Antithrombotic Drugs ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract Background: This study aimed to review and evaluate the surgical outcomes, particularly intraoperative severe blood loss and postoperative blood complications, of emergency gastrointestinal surgery in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy (AT). Emergency surgeries for patients with antithrombotic medication have been increasing in the aging population. However, the effect of AT on intraoperative blood loss and perioperative complications remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 732 patients who underwent emergency gastrointestinal surgery between April 2014 and March 2019. Patients were classified into AT group and Non-AT group, and propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare the short surgical outcomes between the groups. Additionally, risk factors in severe estimated blood loss (EBL) were assessed. The optimal value of EBL was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Altogether, 64 patients received AT; 50 patients and 12, and 2 were given antiplatelet and anticoagulant, and both drugs, respectively. After propensity score matching, EBL (101 vs. 99 ml; p = 0.466) and postoperative complications (14 vs. 16 patients; p = 0.676) were similar between the groups (63 patients matched paired). Intraoperative severe bleeding (EBL ≥ 113 ml) occurred 3 in 146 patients. Multivariate analysis using the full cohort revealed that anticoagulant drug use was an independent risk factor for severe bleeding (odds ratio, 6.50; 95% CI 1.4-36; p = 0.015). Conclusions: This study demonstrated antithrombotic drugs do not adversely affect the perioperative outcomes of emergency gastrointestinal surgery, although patients taking anticoagulant drugs or multiple antithrombotic drugs should undergo careful surgical performances and postoperative management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document