scholarly journals Soft tissue regeneration using leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin after exeresis of hyperplastic gingival lesions: two case reports

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.E. di Lauro ◽  
D. Abbate ◽  
B. Dell’Angelo ◽  
G.A. Iannaccone ◽  
F. Scotto ◽  
...  
Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. 35390-35403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang-Tian Xu ◽  
Zhi-Jie Liang ◽  
Hong-Mian Li ◽  
Qi-Liu Peng ◽  
Min-Hong Huang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 471-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Ghanaati ◽  
Carlos Herrera-Vizcaino ◽  
Sarah Al-Maawi ◽  
Jonas Lorenz ◽  
Richard J Miron ◽  
...  

Platelet-rich fibrin is a blood concentrate system used for soft tissue and bone tissue regeneration. In the last decade, platelet rich fibrin (PRF) has been widely used in different indication fields, particularly in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This review investigates the level of scientific evidence of published articles related to the use of PRF for bone and soft tissue regeneration in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery. An electronic literature research using the biomedical search engine “National Library of Medicine” (PubMed-MEDLINE) was performed in May 2017. A total of 392 articles were found, 72 of which were classified for each indication field. When comparing PRF with biomaterials vs biomaterial alone in sinus lift (5 studies; IIa), no statistically significant differences were detected. Socket preservation and ridge augmentation using PRF significantly enhanced new bone formation compared to healing without PRF (7 studies Ib, IIa, IIb). Reepithelialization and bone regeneration was achieved in 96 of 101 patients diagnosed with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (5 studies, III). In periodontology, PRF alone (6 studies; Ib, IIa, IIb) or its combination with biomaterials (6 studies; Ib, IIa, IIb) significantly improved the pocket depth and attachment loss compared to a treatment without PRF. Over 70% of the patients were part of studies with a high level of scientific evidence (randomized and controlled prospective studies). This published evidence (38 articles), with a high scientific level, showed that PRF is a beneficial tool that significantly improves bone and soft tissue regeneration. However, the clinical community requires a standardization of PRF protocols to further examine the benefit of PRF in bone and soft tissue regeneration in reproducible studies, with a higher scientific level of evidence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-214
Author(s):  
Roshan James ◽  
Matthew D. Harmon ◽  
Sangamesh G. Kumbar ◽  
Cato T. Laurencin

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 4096-4109
Author(s):  
Jinchun Ye ◽  
Chang Xie ◽  
Canlong Wang ◽  
Jiayun Huang ◽  
Zi Yin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Wandel ◽  
Craig A. Bell ◽  
Jiayi Yu ◽  
Maria C. Arno ◽  
Nathan Z. Dreger ◽  
...  

AbstractComplex biological tissues are highly viscoelastic and dynamic. Efforts to repair or replace cartilage, tendon, muscle, and vasculature using materials that facilitate repair and regeneration have been ongoing for decades. However, materials that possess the mechanical, chemical, and resorption characteristics necessary to recapitulate these tissues have been difficult to mimic using synthetic resorbable biomaterials. Herein, we report a series of resorbable elastomer-like materials that are compositionally identical and possess varying ratios of cis:trans double bonds in the backbone. These features afford concomitant control over the mechanical and surface eroding degradation properties of these materials. We show the materials can be functionalized post-polymerization with bioactive species and enhance cell adhesion. Furthermore, an in vivo rat model demonstrates that degradation and resorption are dependent on succinate stoichiometry in the elastomers and the results show limited inflammation highlighting their potential for use in soft tissue regeneration and drug delivery.


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Sven Pantermehl ◽  
Steffen Emmert ◽  
Aenne Foth ◽  
Niels Grabow ◽  
Said Alkildani ◽  
...  

The use of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies is a relatively young research area in modern medicine. This technology offers a fast and effective way of producing implants, tissues, or entire organs individually adapted to the needs of a patient. Today, a large number of different 3D printing technologies with individual application areas are available. This review is intended to provide a general overview of these various printing technologies and their function for medical use. For this purpose, the design and functionality of the different applications are presented and their individual strengths and weaknesses are explained. Where possible, previous studies using the respective technologies in the field of tissue engineering are briefly summarized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document