scholarly journals Effect of family-centered care interventions on motor and neurobehavior development of very preterm infants: a protocol for systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy ◽  
Bhamini Krishna Rao ◽  
Shubha R. Nayak ◽  
Alicia J. Spittle ◽  
Shradha S. Parsekar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Family Centered

Abstract Background Globally, very preterm birth is a health concern leading to various developmental difficulties such as poor motor and/or cognitive function. For infants born very preterm, family-centered care (FCC) might promote developmental skills over the time in an appropriate enriched environment. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and assess the evidence of FCC interventions on the motor and neurobehavioral development in very preterm infants. Additionally, this review aims to determine the factors that might affect infant development. Methods Systematic review will be carried out by including (a) quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials (b) of very preterm born infants (born < 32 weeks of gestation), and their primary caregivers will be included in the review (c) who received FCC-based interventions such as collaborative interaction between a healthcare professional and a parent, home program, home visits, and parent education, and (d) measure motor and neurobehavioral function. Electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO will be searched using database-specific terms. Additionally, searches will be carried out in ProQuest, and references of included studies will be searched. Two review authors, independently, will conduct the screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies. If possible, a meta-analysis will be undertaken to assess the effect of the FCC on the motor and neurobehavior of premature infants. Conclusion The review will provide insights regarding the effect of the FCC on preterm infants. This systematic review will guide the clinicians on the feasibility of practicing FCC that might support and promote the integration of parents into various rehabilitation settings. Systematic review registration Protocol has been registered in PROSPERO on August 26, 2020.

scholarly journals Effect of family-centered care interventions on motor and neurobehavior development of very preterm infants: a protocol for systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy ◽  
Bhamini Krishna Rao ◽  
Shubha R Nayak ◽  
Alicia J Spittle ◽  
Shradha S Parsekar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Family Centered

Abstract Background: Globally, very preterm birth is a health concern leading to various developmental difficulties such as poor motor and/or cognitive function. For infants born very preterm, Family-Centered Care (FCC) might promote developmental skills over the time in an appropriate enriched environment. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and assess the evidence of FCC interventions on the motor and neurobehavioral development in very preterm infants. Additionally, this review aims to determine the factors that might affect infant development.Methods: Systematic review will be carried out by including a) quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials b) of very preterm born infants (born < 32 weeks of gestation) and their primary caregivers will be included in the review c) who received FCC based interventions such as collaborative interaction between a healthcare professional and a parent, home program, home visits, and parent education and d) measure motor and neurobehavioral function. Electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO will be searched using database-specific terms. Additionally, searches will be carried out in ProQuest, and references of included studies will be searched. Two review authors, independently, will conduct the screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies. If possible, a meta-analysis will be undertaken to assess the effect of the FCC on the motor and neurobehavior of premature infants.Conclusion: The review will provide insights regarding the effect of the FCC on preterm infants. This systematic review will guide the clinicians on the feasibility of practicing FCC that might support and promote the integration of parents into various rehabilitation settings.Systematic review registration: Protocol has been registered in PROSPERO on August 26, 2020.

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trials in Very Preterm Infants: Does Inclusion in the Study Result in Any Long-Term Benefit?

Neonatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph M. Rüegger ◽  
Andrea Kraus ◽  
Brigitte Koller ◽  
Giancarlo Natalucci ◽  
Beatrice Latal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Term Benefit

scholarly journals The Timing of Initiating Complementary Feeding in Preterm Infants and Its Effect on Overweight: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin M. Vissers ◽  
Edith J.M. Feskens ◽  
Johannes B. van Goudoever ◽  
Arieke J. Janse
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Complementary Feeding ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: What is the appropriate time to start complementary feeding for preterm infants? The answer to this question is yet under debate. The timing of initiating complementary feeding may be associated with overweight in term infants. This systematic review aimed to study the effect of the timing of initiating complementary feeding on overweight in preterm infants. Predefined search items included preterm infants, complementary feeding, overweight, and their synonyms. Summary: The search identified 15,749 articles, of which 5 articles were included. Three studies presented data of randomized controlled trials and 2 studies were cohort studies. Two randomized controlled trials found no significant difference in body mass index (BMI) Z-score between the intervention groups at 12 months of age. One randomized controlled trial presented a significant greater mean rate of growth in length per week until 12 months in the preterm weaning strategy-group compared with the current best practices. One observational study concluded that each month the infants received complementary food later, the Z-score for length and weight was reduced by 0.1. Key Messages: No clear conclusion could be drawn from the included studies. This review illustrates the need for further research to access the effect of the timing of initiating complementary feeding on overweight in preterm infants.

scholarly journals Family-centered Care Improved Neonatal Medical and Neurobehavioral Outcomes in Preterm Infants: Randomized Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 (12) ◽  
pp. 1158-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Ting Yu ◽  
Wu-Shiun Hsieh ◽  
Chyong-Hsin Hsu ◽  
Yuh-Jyh Lin ◽  
Chyi-Her Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Neurobehavioral Outcomes ◽  
Family Centered

scholarly journals Effect of Family-centered Care Interventions on Motor and Neurobehavior Development of Very Preterm Infants: A Protocol of Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy ◽  
Bhamini Krishna Rao ◽  
Shubha R Nayak ◽  
Alicia J Spittle ◽  
Shradha S Parsekar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Infant Development ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm

Abstract Background: Globally, preterm birth is a health concern leading to various developmental difficulties such as poor motor and/or cognitive function. For infants born preterm, FCC promotes developmental skills over the time in an appropriate enriched environment. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and assess the evidence of FCC interventions on motor and neurobehavioral development in very preterm infants. Additionally, this review aims to determine the factors that might affect the infant development.Methods: Systematic review will be carried out by including quasi-experimental controlled trials and randomized controlled trials. Electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO will be searched using database specific terms. Additionally, searches will be carried out in ProQuest, and references of included studies will be searched. Two review authors, independently, will conduct the screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies. If possible, meta-analysis will be undertaken to assess the effect of FCC on motor and neurobehavior of premature infants.Conclusion: The review will provide insights regarding the effect of the FCC on preterm infants. This systematic review will guide the clinicians on the feasibility of practicing FCC that might support and promote the integration of parents into various rehabilitation settings.Systematic review registration: Protocol has been submitted to PROSPERO on July 26, 2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document