scholarly journals Can preoperative liver MRI with gadoxetic acid help reduce open-close laparotomies for curative intent pancreatic cancer surgery?

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartik S. Jhaveri ◽  
Ali Babaei Jandaghi ◽  
Seng Thipphavong ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Anna Dodd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Gadoxetic Acid ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Liver Mri ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Potential Reduction ◽  
Radiology Reports ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography

Abstract Objectives To evaluate gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI (EOB-MRI) versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for preoperative detection of liver metastasis (LM) and reduction of open-close laparotomies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Sixty-six patients with PDAC had undergone preoperative EOB-MRI and CECT. LM detection by EOB-MRI and CECT and their impact on surgical planning, open-close laparotomies were compared by clinical and radiology reports and retrospective analysis of imaging by two blinded independent readers. Histopathology or imaging follow-up was the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed at patient and lesion levels with two-sided McNemar tests. Results EOB-MRI showed higher sensitivity versus CECT (71.7% [62.1-80.0] vs. 34% [25.0-43.8]; p = 0.009), comparable specificity (98.6%, [96.9-99.5] vs. 100%, [99.1-100], and higher AUROC (85.1%, [80.4-89.9] vs. 66.9%, [60.9-73.1]) for LM detection. An incremental 7.6% of patients were excluded from surgery with a potential reduction of up to 13.6% in futile open-close laparotomies due to LM detected on EOB-MRI only. Conclusions Preoperative EOB-MRI has superior diagnostic performance in detecting LM from PDAC. This better informs surgical eligibility with potential reduction of futile open-close laparotomies from attempted curative intent pancreatic cancer surgery.

scholarly journals Aggressive Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer Producing Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-337
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Morita ◽  
Takanori Sakaguchi ◽  
Shinya Ida ◽  
Ryuta Muraki ◽  
Ryo Kitajima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a glycoprotein which stimulates the proliferation, differentiation, and functional activation of myeloid hematopoietic cells. G-CSF-producing pancreatic cancer is rare and its prognosis is strikingly poor. A 69-year-old woman with well-to-moderately differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma (pT3N0M0, stage IIA) underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 was administered for 6 months. Eleven months after surgery, periodic blood examination revealed remarkable leukocytosis (19,120/µL) without fever, which worsened 3 weeks later (36,160/µL). Furthermore, laboratory data showed elevation of the fibrin degradation product-D dimer and that the G-CSF level was high (406 pg/mL), as well as thrombopenia. Multiple liver and lung metastases were detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The patient was treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, and heparin, thrombomodulin alfa, and platelet transfusion were administered concurrently. Leukocytosis and thrombopenia were alleviated after 1 course of chemotherapy. However, remarkable leukocytosis (53,480/µL) recurred on day 1 of the third course of chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a significantly increased number of liver metastases and lung metastases. The patient chose not to receive second-line chemotherapy and died 1 month later at the affiliated hospital. Pancreatic cancer producing G-CSF shows very aggressive behavior. Leukocytosis without infection during routine observation should be considered as a warning of a rapidly growing recurrence.

The timing and the dose of advanced care planning in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: Who makes the call?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 397-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyudmyla Demyan ◽  
Grace Wu ◽  
Dina Moumin ◽  
Gary B Deutsch ◽  
William Nealon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Advanced Care Planning ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Preoperative Counseling

397 Background:The timing and the extent of Advanced Care Planning (ACP) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing curative-intent resection are generally dictated by the surgeon performing the operation. The aim of this study is to evaluate surgeons’ insights, perceptions, and biases regarding preoperative ACP. We hypothesize that many surgeons harbor significant reservations about extensive preoperative ACP. Methods:A qualitative investigation using 1:1 interviews with 40 open-ended questions were conducted with convenience sample. Data accrual continued until theme saturation was achieved. Grounded theory approach was used for data coding and analysis. Results:A total of 10 interviews were conducted with expert pancreatic surgeons from 6 medical centers—6 males and 4 females. The median number of years in practice was 15 (IQR 13-30) and the median number of pancreatic cancer cases performed per year was 52 (IQR 39-75). During preoperative counseling all surgeons discuss the possibility of recurrence and postoperative complications but attempt to motivate patients by emphasizing hope, optimism, and fact that surgery offers the only opportunity for cure. 90% of surgeons report no formal training in ACP. All surgeons report comfort with end of life conversations when death is imminent, but most lack experience with in-depth preoperative ACP. All surgeons emphasized that ACP should be led by a physician that both knows the patient well and understands the complexity of PDAC management. All surgeons recognized potential benefits of ACP, including delivery of goal-concordant care (60%), increased prognostic awareness (40%), and better life planning (40%). 50% report discussing in-depth ACP related to perioperative complications, but not long-term oncologic outcome. 80% of surgeons report that they actively steer away from in-depth ACP during preoperative counseling. Barriers to in-depth ACP reported by surgeons include taking away hope (70%), lack of time (50%) and concern for sending “mixed messages” (50%). Further, 50% of surgeons perceived that extensive preoperative ACP is not appropriate for patients with PDAC undergoing curative-intent resection. Most surgeons (60%) believe that ACP should occur as a process throughout the disease and in-depth discussions were more appropriate during postoperative visits (30%) and/or recurrence (60%). Conclusions:Despite recognizing potential benefits, most pancreatic surgeons report actively avoiding in-depth ACP conversations prior to curative-intent surgery. Surgeons had difficulty articulating the best time for ACP and felt that ACP should occur as a continuum throughout the course of treatment, with the depth of the discussion echoing the disease progression and patients’ readiness for such conversation. Future studies could evaluate patients’ perspective on the timing and the dose of ACP.

scholarly journals Omics Approaches in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1052
Author(s):  
Iranzu González-Boja ◽  
Antonio Viúdez ◽  
Saioa Goñi ◽  
Enrique Santamaria ◽  
Estefania Carrasco-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Pancreatic Cancers ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Shed Light

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which represents 80% of pancreatic cancers, is mainly diagnosed when treatment with curative intent is not possible. Consequently, the overall five-year survival rate is extremely dismal—around 5% to 7%. In addition, pancreatic cancer is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Therefore, advances in screening, prevention and treatment are urgently needed. Fortunately, a wide range of approaches could help shed light in this area. Beyond the use of cytological or histological samples focusing in diagnosis, a plethora of new approaches are currently being used for a deeper characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, including genetic, epigenetic, and/or proteo-transcriptomic techniques. Accordingly, the development of new analytical technologies using body fluids (blood, bile, urine, etc.) to analyze tumor derived molecules has become a priority in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma due to the hard accessibility to tumor samples. These types of technologies will lead us to improve the outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.

scholarly journals Measuring liver function with gadoxetic acid: Is a dual-inlet model needed in dynamic contrast enhanced liver mri?

HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e697
Author(s):  
D.A. Longbotham ◽  
S. Sourbron ◽  
A. Guthrie ◽  
E. Hidalgo ◽  
R. Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Gadoxetic Acid ◽  
Liver Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent – a multicenter survey in Germany and review of the literature

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (07) ◽  
pp. 657-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ettrich ◽  
Lucas Schulte ◽  
Natalie Eitel ◽  
Kristin Ettrich ◽  
Andreas Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Patient History ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Multicenter Survey

Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers with high risk of relapse even after curative-intended resection. There are no evidence-based recommendations for surveillance in actual guidelines. Given this situation and as a basis for prospective studies, we wanted to determine the current practice of surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection in German institutions. Methods A web-based questionnaire was sent in 2015 to 300 German institutions (hospitals, outpatient clinics, and private practices) experienced in the care of patients with PDAC. The questionnaire comprised 23 items including the respective institution, the level of care, the annual case load of pancreatic cancer surgery, the surveillance algorithms used, and the most frequently used means for surveillance as well as their evaluation by the users with respect to the effectiveness of these means. Additionally, we perform a review of the literature. Results The final analysis comprised 161 questionnaires (response rate 53.7 %). Mainly high-volume centers (82.5 % with > 300 hospital beds) participated. In 46.6 % of centers, more than 80 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Between 60 – 80 % of these patients completed the recommended 6 months of adjuvant treatment, and 47 % of the patients received the whole treatment (surgery, adjuvant therapy) and surveillance in the same center. Upon completion of adjuvant treatment, 96 % of centers survey their patients, and 82 % of these centers already employ diagnostic means during the course of adjuvant chemotherapy. The most commonly used diagnostic means were taking patient history, conducting physical examination, performing laboratory tests including CA19 – 9, and imaging. Of those employed, CA19 – 9 and imaging followed by patient history were considered the most efficient to detect disease relapse by the centers. Half of the institutions perform surveillance for 5 years after surgery. Conclusion This is the first systematic analysis of self-reported surveillance strategies used in Germany after resection of PDAC with curative intent. Surveillance after resection of PDAC with curative intent is common in Germany. Alterations of CA19 – 9 levels as well as imaging and taking patient history are considered the most efficient means to detect relapse of disease by the physicians participating in our survey.

scholarly journals Description of focal liver lesions with using Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI

2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-448
Author(s):  
Cosmin-Nicolae Caraiani ◽  
Marian Dan ◽  
Diana-Ioana Fenesan ◽  
Radu Badea
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Media ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Dynamic Mri ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Mri ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography

Imaging procedures play a fundamental role in the therapeutic management of focal liver lesions. The goals of imaging are to detect and correctly characterize focal liver lesions. This review highlights the performances of newer, liver-specific, contrast media in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions, particularly Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist), the most frequently used liver specific contrast media. It has been shown, in different papers, that Gd-EOB-DTPA has better performances compared to either triphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography or dynamic MRI in both detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma on the cirrhotic liver. Therefore liver MRI with Primovist is considered, in many centers, the "state-of-the-art" imaging examination of the liver before surgery or liver transplantation. Gd-EOB-DTPA is also useful in the differential diagnosis of benign hypervascular focal liver lesions such as adenomas or focal nodular hyperplasias.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document