scholarly journals Are there any differences in the provided burn care between men and women? A retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Pompermaier ◽  
Moustafa Elmasry ◽  
Islam Abdelrahman ◽  
Mats Fredrikson ◽  
Folke Sjöberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Disparity between medical treatment for men and women has been recorded worldwide. However, it is difficult to find out if the disparities in both the use of resources and outcome depend entirely on sex-related discrimination. Our aim was to investigate if there are differences in burn treatments between the sexes. Methods All patients admitted with burns to Linköping University Hospital during the 16-year period 2000–2015 were included. Interventions were prospectively recorded using the validated Burn SCoring system (BSC). Data were analysed using a multivariable panel regression model adjusted for age, percentage total body surface area (%TBSA), and in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 1363 patients were included, who generated a total of 22,301 daily recordings while they were inpatients. Males were 70% (930/1363). Sex was not an independent factor for daily scores after adjustment for age, %TBSA, and mortality in hospital (model R2=0.60, p < 0.001). Conclusion We found no evidence of inequity between the sexes in treatments given in our burn centre when we had adjusted for size of burn, age, and mortality. BSC seems to be an appropriate model in which to evaluate sex-related differences in the delivery of treatments.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 476
Author(s):  
Ioana Tichil ◽  
Samara Rosenblum ◽  
Eldho Paul ◽  
Heather Cleland

Objective: To determine blood transfusion practices, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the use of blood products in the setting of the acute management of burn patients at the Victorian Adult Burn Service. Background: Patients with burn injuries have variable transfusion requirements, based on a multitude of factors. We reviewed all acute admissions to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS) between 2011 and 2017: 1636 patients in total, of whom 948 had surgery and were the focus of our analysis. Method and results: Patient demographics, surgical management, transfusion details, and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. A total of 175 patients out of the 948 who had surgery also had a blood transfusion, while 52% of transfusions occurred in the perioperative period. The median trigger haemoglobin in perioperative was 80mg/dL (IQR = 76–84.9 mg/dL), and in the non-perioperative setting was 77 mg/dL (IQR = 71.61–80.84 mg/dL). Age, gender, % total body surface area (TBSA) burn, number of surgeries, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were associated with transfusion. Conclusions: The use of blood transfusions is an essential component of the surgical management of major burns. As observed in our study, half of these transfusions are related to surgical procedures and may be influenced by the employment of blood conserving strategies. Furthermore, transfusion trigger levels in stable patients may be amenable to review and reduction. Risk adjusted analysis can support the implementation of blood transfusion as a useful quality indicator in burn care.


PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9984
Author(s):  
Shin-Yi Tsai ◽  
Chon-Fu Lio ◽  
Shou-Chuan Shih ◽  
Cheng-Jui Lin ◽  
Yu-Tien Chen ◽  
...  

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most severe complications of burn injury. AKI with severe burn injury causes high mortality. This study aims to investigate the incidence of and predisposing factors for AKI in burn patients. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective, descriptive criterion standard study conducted from June 27, 2015, to March 8, 2016. We used Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria to define and select patients with AKI. The study was conducted by recruiting in hospital patients who suffered from the flammable cornstarch-based powder explosion and were treated under primary care procedures. A total of 49 patients who suffered from flammable dust explosion-related burn injury were enrolled and admitted on June 27, 2015. The patients with more than 20% total body surface area of burn were transferred to the intensive care unit. Patients received fluid resuscitation in the first 24 hours based on the Parkland formula. The primary measurements were the incidence of and predisposing factors for AKI in these patients. Demographic characteristics, laboratory data, and inpatient outcomes were also evaluated. The incidence of AKI in this cohort was 61.2% (n = 30). The mortality rate was 2.0% (n = 1) during a 59-day follow-up period. The multivariate analysis revealed inhalation injury (adjusted OR = 22.0; 95% CI [1.4–358.2]) and meeting ≥3 American Burn Association (ABA) sepsis criteria (adjusted OR = 13.7; 95% CI [1.7–110.5]) as independent risk factors for early advanced AKI. Conclusions The incidence rate of AKI was higher in this cohort than in previous studies, possibly due to the flammable dust explosion-related burn injury. However, the mortality was lower than that expected. In clinical practice, indicators of inflammation, including ABA sepsis criteria may help in predicting the risk of AKI in patients with burn injury.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S43-S43
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bruenderman ◽  
Selena The ◽  
Nathan Bodily ◽  
Matthew Bozeman

Abstract Introduction Burn care in the United States takes place primarily in tertiary care centers with specialty-focused burn capabilities. Patients are often initially transported to centers without burn capabilities, requiring subsequent transfer to a higher level of care. This study aims to evaluate the effect of this treatment delay on outcomes. Methods Under IRB approval, adult burn patients meeting American Burn Association (ABA) criteria for transfer at a single burn center were retrospectively identified. Cohorts were divided into patients who were initially taken to a non-burn center and subsequently transferred versus patients taken immediately to a burn center. Outcomes between the groups were compared. Results A total of 122 patients were identified, 61 in each cohort. There was no difference between the transfer and direct admit cohorts with respect to median age (52 vs. 46, p = 0.45), percent total body surface area burn (10% vs. 10%, p = 0.08), concomitant injury (0 vs. 4, p = 0.12), or intubation prior to admission (5 vs. 7, p = 0.76). Transfer patients experienced a longer median time from injury to burn center admission than directly admitted patients (1 vs. 8 hours, p < 0.01). Directly admitted patients were more likely to have inhalation burn (18 vs. 4, p < 0.01), require intubation after admission (10 vs. 2, p = 0.03), require an emergent procedure (18 vs. 5, p < 0.01), and develop infectious complications (14 vs. 5, p = 0.04). However, there was no difference between transfers and direct admits in ventilator days (9 vs. 3 days, p = 0.37), number of operations (0 vs. 0, p = 0.16), length of stay (3 vs. 3 days, p = 0.44), or mortality (6 vs. 3, p = 0.50). Conclusions This study suggests that significantly injured, hemodynamically unstable patients were more likely to be immediately identified and taken directly to a burn center. Patients who otherwise met ABA criteria for transfer were not affected by short delays in transfer to definitive burn care. Applicability of Research to Practice Initial triage and evaluation of hemodynamically stable patients at non-burn centers does not negatively impact outcomes in patients who meet ABA criteria for transfer to a burn center.


Author(s):  
Shahriar Shahrokhi ◽  
Marc G. Jeschke

Outcomes of burn patients have significantly improved over the last two decades. A recent study in The Lancet showed that a burn size of over 60% total body surface area (TBSA) burned is now recognized as being associated with high risks; a decade ago similar risks resulted from a 40% TBSA burned. Similar data have been obtained in severely-burned adults and the elderly. This chapter discusses current standards, recent evidence, and future developments in burn care to improve outcomes of these patients. Critical components in the management of patients with burns are early adequate resuscitation, recognition and management of airway burns and appropriate treatment of the different stages of burn care—prehospital, early, and late management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S17-S18
Author(s):  
Philip D Hewes ◽  
Derek Bell

Abstract Introduction Estimates on frequency and outcomes of burn or inhalation injury in the United States are limited since reported databases are confined to specific phases of care, included facilities, length of follow-up, facility/provider/patient identification and/or lack of longitudinal tracking. A population-based database addresses these issues. Methods We queried a statewide mandated-reporting database for the years from 2000 through 2015 at the time of injury using a set of ICD9-CM codes for second degree or deeper burns, inhalation injury, and chemical and electrical burns. Burn total body surface area percentage by anatomical region was assigned as appropriate using modified and age-stratified Lund and Browder charts. Records for each patient were extracted out to one year pre- and post-injury, as available. Provider and facility burn volume and survival was stratified into quartiles. We applied the Committee on Trauma/American Burn Association referral criteria to the index presentation. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to 1-year post injury for testing combinations of burn percent total body surface area of 20% and inhalation injury for age ranges < 15, 15 - 60, and >60 years. Regression models were developed to model the probabilities of in-patient, 90-day, and 365-day mortality and readmission. Results 56,712 patients were included. Overall, 22% of patients meeting referral criteria were never seen at a burn center within 1-year post-injury. The greatest positive predictors of in-patient mortality were facility case volume and burn percent total body surface area. The greatest negative predictors were high provider burn case volume (for highest quartile, adjusted odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence intervals 0.06 – 0.12). The highest risk of unscheduled 30-day readmission was associated with index presentation to a non-burn care facility (p < 0.001). For all groups, the first 100 days had the greatest mortality rate, the most severe being among patients of age greater than 60 with >20% burn percent total body surface area and inhalation injury, with a 40% survival rate. Conclusions This study is the first to be able to simultaneously evaluate in-patient, post-discharge, and facility-based parameters for outcomes. A significant number of patients are not accounted with current databases. Applicability of Research to Practice A population-based approach with longitudinal tracking allows for greater realization of the outcomes of all patients following burn injury. Existing association-supported or government databases fail to account for a significant portion of burn victims, motivating further evaluation of burn care efforts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Aung ◽  
D. Garner ◽  
M. Pacquola ◽  
S. Rosenblum ◽  
J. McClure ◽  
...  

Major burn centres in Australia use bronchoscopy to assess severity of inhalation injuries despite limited evidence as to how best to classify severity of inhalational injury or its relationship to patient outcomes. All patients with burns who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at The Alfred Hospital between February 2010 and July 2014 and underwent bronchoscopy to assess inhalational injury, were reviewed. Age, total body surface area burnt, severity of illness indices and mechanisms of injury were extracted from medical histories and local ICU and burns registries. Inhalational injury was classified based on the Abbreviated Injury Score and then grouped into three categories (none/mild, moderate, or severe injury). Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken to examine the relationship between inhalational injury and outcomes (in-hospital mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation). One hundred and twenty-eight patients were classified as having none/mild inhalational injury, 81 moderate, and 13 severe inhalation injury. Mortality in each group was 2.3% (3/128), 7.4% (6/81) and 30.7% (4/13) respectively. Median (interquartile range) duration of mechanical ventilation in each group was 26 (11–82) hours, 84 (32–232) hours and 94 (21–146) hours respectively. After adjusting for age, total body surface area burnt and severity of illness, only the severe inhalation injury group was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 20.4 [95% confidence intervals {CI} 1.74 to 239.4], P=0.016). Moderate inhalation injury was independently associated with increased duration of ventilation (odds ratio 2.25 [95% CI 1.53 to 3.31], P <0.001), but not increased mortality. This study suggests that stratification of bronchoscopically-assessed inhalational injury into three categories can provide useful prognostic information about duration of ventilation and mortality. Larger multicentre prospective studies are required to validate these findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (01) ◽  
pp. 097-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tandon ◽  
K. Agrawal ◽  
R.P. Narayan ◽  
V.K. Tiwari ◽  
V. Prakash ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Setting and Design: A hospital-based retrospective study of firecracker-related injuries was carried out at a government sponsored hospital in Delhi. Materials and Methods: 1373 patients attended the emergency burn care out-patients clinic during 2002-2010 pre-Diwali, Diwali and post-Diwali days. Every year, a disaster management protocol is revoked during these 3 days under the direct supervision of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Results: There was an increase in the number of patients of firecracker-related injuries in Delhi national capital region from the year 2002 to 2010, based on the hospital statistics. During the study period, the hospital received approximately one patient with firecracker-related injury per 100,000 population of the city. 73.02% of the victims were 5-30 years old. Majority (90.87%) of them sustained <5% total body surface area burn. Conclusions: In spite of legislations and court orders, the number of patients is on the rise. The implementation agencies have to analyse the situation to find a way to control this preventable manmade accident. Websites, emails, SMS, social sites, etc. should be used for public education, apart from conventional methods of public awareness.


Author(s):  
Joachim N Meuli ◽  
Olivier Pantet ◽  
Mette M Berger ◽  
Laurent Waselle ◽  
Wassim Raffoul

Abstract Background The treatment and management of massive burns, defined as burns affecting≥ 50% of total body surface area (TBSA) has considerably changed since the 90s. This study aimed at analyzing if the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, the success of skin grafting operations and the mortality changed in the last 18 years. Methods Between 2000 and 2018, 77 patients were admitted for massive burns to the ICU of a university hospital. Transfers and early care withdrawal precluded inclusion for 38 patients, leaving 39 for analysis. Study variables were year of admission, demographics, burn characteristics, critical care treatment (fluid resuscitation, ventilation and nutrition) and surgical therapy. Association between outcomes and year of admission were assessed through correlation and logistic regression analysis. Potential confounders were assessed through stepwise linear regression. Results Patients’ characteristics were stable over time with a median age of 36[25.0, 48.0] years, burns 65% [55.0, 83.0] TBSA and deep burns 55% [50.0, 68.0] TBSA . Length of ICU stay remained stable at 0.97 [0.6, 1.5] days/%TBSA. Mortality was stable as well. Energy and carbohydrate delivery decreased in parallel with the number of infectious episodes per patient. Number of operations was stable but the take rate of skin grafts increased significantly. The multivariate analysis retained year of admission, weight, total number of infections, daily lipid intakes and fluid resuscitation as independent predicting variables, Conclusion Length of ICU stay and mortality did not change over time but skin grafts take rates improved significantly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S41-S41
Author(s):  
Zach Z Zhang ◽  
Andrew Golin ◽  
Anthony Papp

Abstract Introduction Outpatient burn surgery is increasingly utilized for delivery of acute burn care. Reports of its safety and efficacy are limited. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and cost reduction associated with outpatient burn surgery and to describe our centre’s experience. Methods This was a single centre, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent outpatient acute burn surgery requiring split thickness skin graft or dermal regenerative template from January 2010 - December 2018. Patients with insufficient follow up to evaluate operative site healing were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, burn etiologies, operative data and postoperative care were reviewed. The primary outcome is complication involving major graft loss requiring reoperation. Results 165 patients and 173 procedures met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 44 years and 60.6% (100/165) were male. The number of annual outpatient procedures increased 48% from 23 to 34 cases over the 9-year period. The mean grafted total body surface area was 1.0 ± 0.9%. Rate of major graft loss requiring reoperation was 5.2% (9/172). Greater than 95% graft take was achieved in 80.9% of patients. Age, sex, co-morbidities, total body surface area, and procedure types were not significantly associated with postoperative complication rate. Outpatient burn surgery model was estimated to save CA$7,875 per patient from inpatient costs. This extrapolates to a total of over CA$1.36 million in savings over the 9-year study period. Conclusions Acute burn care at our centre is increasingly being delivered through an outpatient day surgery model. Our demonstration of its safety and considerable cost savings is compelling for further utilization. Our experience found the adoption of improved dressing care, appropriate patient selection, increased patient education, adequate pain control, and regimented outpatient multidisciplinary care to be fundamental for effective outpatient surgical burn care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S72-S73
Author(s):  
Kelli N Patterson ◽  
Kyle Horvath ◽  
Amanda Onwuka ◽  
Renata Fabia ◽  
Sheila Giles ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Studies on length of stay (LOS) per total body surface area (TBSA) burn in pediatric patients have been performed at single institutions and based on ranges of TBSA burn. A LOS to TBSA burn ratio of 1:1 has also been widely accepted but not confirmed over time across numerous institutions. The objective of this study was to use multi-institutional pediatric burn data to describe benchmarks associated with LOS per TBSA burn. Methods Data from the Pediatric Injury Quality Improvement Collaborative (PIQIC) were obtained for 1004 patients (n=1004) treated at five pediatric burn centers from July 2018-March 2020. LOS/TBSA burn ratios were calculated for each site. LOS/TBSA burn by institution and mechanism were analyzed. Generalized linear regression models were used to model the effect of hospital and burn mechanism on the LOS/TBSA ratio. Results Among the 1004 injuries, the most common burn mechanism was by scald (64%), followed by contact (16%) and flame (13%). The average LOS/TBSA burn ratio across all cases was 1.3 days (SD 2.2). Flame burns had a higher LOS/TBSA burn ratio than scald burns with a mean LOS/TBSA burn of 1.63 compared to 0.84. In adjusted models, scald burns, and chemical burns had the lowest LOS/TBSA burn ratio and electrical and friction burns had the highest LOS/TBSA burn ratio. The LOS/TBSA burn ratio was comparable across hospitals after adjustment for mechanism, with just Hospital 4 having a lower average LOS/TBSA burn of 0.49 days. Conclusions These data establish a multi-institutional ratio for the overall performance in LOS for pediatric burn patients. A LOS per TBSA ratio of about 1 was observed across PIQIC centers, except for a lower ratio at one center. Additionally, it provides evidence on the variance in LOS per TBSA burn relative to the sustained burn mechanism. Further collaborative data analysis will allow us to recognize specific patterns and outcomes in pediatric burn care, which is essential for the implementation of quality improvement standards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document