Velocity analysis for tilted transversely isotropic media: A physical modeling example

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 904-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Grechka ◽  
Andres Pech ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin ◽  
Baoniu Han

Transverse isotropy with a tilted symmetry axis (TTI media) has been recognized as a common feature of shale formations in overthrust areas, such as the Canadian Foothills. Since TTI layers cause serious problems in conventional imaging, it is important to be able to reconstruct the velocity model suitable for anisotropic depth migration. Here, we discuss the results of anisotropic parameter estimation on a physical‐modeling data set. The model represents a simplified version of a typical overthrust section from the Alberta Foothills, with a horizontal reflector overlaid by a bending transversely isotropic layer. Assuming that the TTI layer is homogeneous and the symmetry axis stays perpendicular to its boundaries, we invert P-wave normal‐moveout (NMO) velocities and zero‐offset traveltimes for the symmetry‐direction velocity V0 and the anisotropic parameters ε and δ. The coefficient ε is obtained using the traveltimes of a wave that crosses a dipping TTI block and reflects from the bottom of the model. The inversion for ε is based on analytic expressions for NMO velocity in media with intermediate dipping interfaces. Our estimates of both anisotropic coefficients are close to their actual values. The errors in the inversion, which are associated primarily with the uncertainties in picking the NMO velocities and traveltimes, can be reduced by a straighforward modification of the acquisition geometry. It should be emphasized that the moveout inversion also gives an accurate estimate of the thickness of the TTI layer, thus reconstructing the correct depth scale of the section. Although the physical model used here was relatively simple, our results demonstrate the principal feasibility of anisotropic velocity analysis and imaging in overthrust areas. The main problems in anisotropic processing for TTI models are likely to be caused by the lateral variation of the velocity field and overall structural complexity.

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 232-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Grechka ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin

Just as the transversely isotropic model with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI media) is typical for describing horizontally layered sediments, transverse isotropy with a tilted symmetry axis (TTI) describes dipping TI layers (such as tilted shale beds near salt domes) or crack systems. P-wave kinematic signatures in TTI media are controlled by the velocity [Formula: see text] in the symmetry direction, Thomsen’s anisotropic coefficients ε and δ, and the orientation (tilt ν and azimuth β) of the symmetry axis. Here, we show that all five parameters can be obtained from azimuthally varying P-wave NMO velocities measured for two reflectors with different dips and/or azimuths (one of the reflectors can be horizontal). The shear‐wave velocity [Formula: see text] in the symmetry direction, which has negligible influence on P-wave kinematic signatures, can be found only from the moveout of shear waves. Using the exact NMO equation, we examine the propagation of errors in observed moveout velocities into estimated values of the anisotropic parameters and establish the necessary conditions for a stable inversion procedure. Since the azimuthal variation of the NMO velocity is elliptical, each reflection event provides us with up to three constraints on the model parameters. Generally, the five parameters responsible for P-wave velocity can be obtained from two P-wave NMO ellipses, but the feasibility of the moveout inversion strongly depends on the tilt ν. If the symmetry axis is close to vertical (small ν), the P-wave NMO ellipse is largely governed by the NMO velocity from a horizontal reflector Vnmo(0) and the anellipticity coefficient η. Although for mild tilts the medium parameters cannot be determined separately, the NMO-velocity inversion provides enough information for building TTI models suitable for time processing (NMO, DMO, time migration). If the tilt of the symmetry axis exceeds 30°–40° (e.g., the symmetry axis can be horizontal), it is possible to find all P-wave kinematic parameters and construct the anisotropic model in depth. Another condition required for a stable parameter estimate is that the medium be sufficiently different from elliptical (i.e., ε cannot be close to δ). This limitation, however, can be overcome by including the SV-wave NMO ellipse from a horizontal reflector in the inversion procedure. While most of the analysis is carried out for a single layer, we also extend the inversion algorithm to vertically heterogeneous TTI media above a dipping reflector using the generalized Dix equation. A synthetic example for a strongly anisotropic, stratified TTI medium demonstrates a high accuracy of the inversion (subject to the above limitations).


Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1219-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Contreras ◽  
Vladimir Grechka ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin

The transversely isotropic model with a horizontal symmetry axis (HTI media) has been extensively used in seismological studies of fractured reservoirs. In this paper, a parameter‐estimation technique originally developed by Grechka and Tsvankin for the more general orthorhombic media is applied to horizontal transverse isotropy. Our methodology is based on the inversion of azimuthally‐dependent P-wave normal‐moveout (NMO) velocities from horizontal and dipping reflectors. If the NMO velocity of a given reflection event is plotted in each azimuthal direction, it forms an ellipse determined by three combinations of medium parameters. The NMO ellipse from a horizontal reflector in HTI media can be inverted for the azimuth β of the symmetry axis, the vertical velocity [Formula: see text], and the Thomsen‐type anisotropic parameter δ(V). We describe a technique for obtaining the remaining (for P-waves) anisotropic parameter η(V) (or ε(V)) from the NMO ellipse corresponding to a dipping reflector of arbitrary azimuth. The interval parameters of vertically inhomogeneous HTI media are recovered using the generalized Dix equation that operates with NMO ellipses for horizontal and dipping events. High accuracy of our method is confirmed by inverting a synthetic multiazimuth P-wave data set generated by ray tracing for a layered HTI medium with depth‐varying orientation of the symmetry axis. Although estimation of η(V) can be carried out by the algorithm developed for orthorhombic media, for more stable results the HTI model has to be used from the outset of the inversion procedure. It should be emphasized that P-wave conventional‐spread moveout data provide enough information to distinguish between HTI and lower‐symmetry models. We show that if the medium has the orthorhombic symmetry and is sufficiently different from HTI, the best‐fit HTI model cannot match the NMO ellipses for both a horizontal and a dipping event. The anisotropic coefficients responsible for P-wave moveout can be combined to estimate the crack density and predict whether the cracks are fluid‐filled or dry. A unique feature of the HTI model that distinguishes it from both vertical transverse isotropy and orthorhombic media is that moveout inversion provides not just zero‐dip NMO velocities and anisotropic coefficients, but also the true vertical velocity. As a result, reflection P-wave data acquired over HTI formations can be used to build velocity models in depth and perform anisotropic depth processing.


Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. C11-C23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Wang ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin

Reflection tomography in the migrated domain can help reconstruct heterogeneous, anisotropic velocity fields needed for accurate depth imaging of complex geologic structures. The presence of anisotropy, however, increases the uncertainty in velocity analysis and typically requires a priori constraints on the model parameters. Here, we develop a 2D P-wave tomographic algorithm for heterogeneous transversely isotropic media with a tilted symmetry axis (TTI) and investigate the conditions necessary for stable estimation of the symmetry-direction velocity [Formula: see text] and the anisotropy parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The model is divided into rectangular cells, and the parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and the tilt [Formula: see text] of the symmetry axis are defined at the grid points. To increase the stability of the inversion, the symmetry axis is set orthogonal to the imaged reflectors, with the tilt interpolated inside each layer. The iterative migration velocity analysis involves efficient linearized parameter updating designed to minimize the residual moveout in image gathers for all available reflection events. The moveout equation in the depth-migrated domain includes a nonhyperbolic term that describes long-offset data, which are particularly sensitive to [Formula: see text]. Synthetic tests for models with a “quasi-factorized” TTI syncline (i.e., [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are constant inside the anisotropic layer) and a TTI thrust sheet demonstrate that stable parameter estimation requires either strong smoothness constraints or additional information from walkaway VSP (vertical seismic profiling) traveltimes. If the model is quasi-factorized with a linear spatial variation of [Formula: see text], it may be possible to obtain the interval TTI parameters just from long-spread reflection data.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. C57-C74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman A. Alshuhail ◽  
Dirk J. Verschuur

Because the earth is predominately anisotropic, the anisotropy of the medium needs to be included in seismic imaging to avoid mispositioning of reflectors and unfocused images. Deriving accurate anisotropic velocities from the seismic reflection measurements is a highly nonlinear and ambiguous process. To mitigate the nonlinearity and trade-offs between parameters, we have included anisotropy in the so-called joint migration inversion (JMI) method, in which we limit ourselves to the case of transverse isotropy with a vertical symmetry axis. The JMI method is based on strictly separating the scattering effects in the data from the propagation effects. The scattering information is encoded in the reflectivity operators, whereas the phase information is encoded in the propagation operators. This strict separation enables the method to be more robust, in that it can appropriately handle a wide range of starting models, even when the differences in traveltimes are more than a half cycle away. The method also uses internal multiples in estimating reflectivities and anisotropic velocities. Including internal multiples in inversion not only reduces the crosstalk in the final image, but it can also reduce the trade-off between the anisotropic parameters because internal multiples usually have more of an imprint of the subsurface parameters compared with primaries. The inverse problem is parameterized in terms of a reflectivity, vertical velocity, horizontal velocity, and a fixed [Formula: see text] value. The method is demonstrated on several synthetic models and a marine data set from the North Sea. Our results indicate that using JMI for anisotropic inversion makes the inversion robust in terms of using highly erroneous initial models. Moreover, internal multiples can contain valuable information on the subsurface parameters, which can help to reduce the trade-off between anisotropic parameters in inversion.


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1305-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbo Zhou ◽  
George A. McMechan

An analytical formula for geometrical spreading is derived for a horizontally layered transversely isotropic medium with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI). With this expression, geometrical spreading can be determined using only the anisotropy parameters in the first layer, the traveltime derivatives, and the source‐receiver offset. Explicit, numerically feasible expressions for geometrical spreading are obtained for special cases of transverse isotropy (weak anisotropy and elliptic anisotropy). Geometrical spreading can be calculated for transversly isotropic (TI) media by using picked traveltimes of primary nonhyperbolic P-wave reflections without having to know the actual parameters in the deeper subsurface; no ray tracing is needed. Synthetic examples verify the algorithm and show that it is numerically feasible for calculation of geometrical spreading. For media with a few (4–5) layers, relative errors in the computed geometrical spreading remain less than 0.5% for offset/depth ratios less than 1.0. Errors that change with offset are attributed to inaccuracy in the expression used for nonhyberbolic moveout. Geometrical spreading is most sensitive to errors in NMO velocity, followed by errors in zero‐offset reflection time, followed by errors in anisotropy of the surface layer. New relations between group and phase velocities and between group and phase angles are shown in appendices.


Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1920-1928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Grechka ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin

Processing of seismic data is often performed under the assumption that the velocity distribution in the subsurface can be approximated by a macromodel composed of isotropic homogeneous layers or blocks. Despite being physically unrealistic, such models are believed to be sufficient for describing the kinematics of reflection arrivals. In this paper, we examine the distortions in normal‐moveout (NMO) velocities caused by the intralayer vertical heterogeneity unaccounted for in velocity analysis. To match P‐wave moveout measurements from a horizontal or a dipping reflector overlaid by a vertically heterogeneous isotropic medium, the effective homogeneous overburden has to be anisotropic. This apparent anisotropy is caused not only by velocity monotonically increasing with depth, but also by random velocity variations similar to those routinely observed in well logs. Assuming that the effective homogeneous medium is transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI), we express the VTI parameters through the actual depth‐dependent isotropic velocity function. If the reflector is horizontal, combining the NMO and vertical velocities always results in nonnegative values of Thomsen's coefficient δ. For a dipping reflector, the inversion of the P‐wave NMO ellipse yields a nonnegative Alkhalifah‐Tsvankin coefficient η that increases with dip. The values of η obtained by two other methods (2‐D dip‐moveout inversion and nonhyperbolic moveout analysis) are also nonnegative but generally differ from that needed to fit the NMO ellipse. For truly anisotropic (VTI) media, the influence of vertical heterogeneity above the reflector can lead to a bias toward positive δ and η estimates in velocity analysis.


Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. WC51-WC63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Wang ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin

Transversely isotropic models with a tilted symmetry axis (TTI media) are widely used in depth imaging of complex geologic structures. Here, we present a modification of a previously developed 2D P-wave tomographic algorithm for estimating heterogeneous TTI velocity fields and apply it to synthetic and field data. The symmetry-direction velocity [Formula: see text], anisotropy parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and symmetry-axis tilt [Formula: see text] are defined on a rectangular grid. To ensure stable reconstruction of the TTI parameters, reflection data are combined with walkaway vertical seismic profiling (VSP) traveltimes in joint tomographic inversion. To improve the convergence of the algorithm, we develop a three-stage model-updating procedure that gradually relaxes the constraints on the spatial variations of the anisotropy parameters, while the symmetry axis is kept orthogonal to the reflectors. Only at the final stage of the inversion are the parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] updated on the same grid. We also incorporate geologic constraints into tomography by designing regularization terms that penalize parameter variations in the direction parallel to the interfaces. First, we examine the performance of the regularized joint tomography of reflection and VSP data for two sections of the BP TTI model that contain an anticline and a salt dome. All three TTI parameters in the shallow part of both sections (down to 5 km) are well resolved by the proposed model-updating process. Then, the algorithm is applied to a 2D section from 3D ocean-bottom seismic data acquired at Volve field in the North Sea. The inverted TTI model produces well-focused reflectors throughout the section and accurately positions the key horizons, which is confirmed by the available well markers.


Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. D27-D36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Bakulin ◽  
Marta Woodward ◽  
Dave Nichols ◽  
Konstantin Osypov ◽  
Olga Zdraveva

Tilted transverse isotropy (TTI) is increasingly recognized as a more geologically plausible description of anisotropy in sedimentary formations than vertical transverse isotropy (VTI). Although model-building approaches for VTI media are well understood, similar approaches for TTI media are in their infancy, even when the symmetry-axis direction is assumed known. We describe a tomographic approach that builds localized anisotropic models by jointly inverting surface-seismic and well data. We present a synthetic data example of anisotropic tomography applied to a layered TTI model with a symmetry-axis tilt of 45 degrees. We demonstrate three scenarios for constraining the solution. In the first scenario, velocity along the symmetry axis is known and tomography inverts for Thomsen’s [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] parame-ters. In the second scenario, tomography inverts for [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and velocity, using surface-seismic data and vertical check-shot traveltimes. In contrast to the VTI case, both these inversions are nonunique. To combat nonuniqueness, in the third scenario, we supplement check-shot and seismic data with the [Formula: see text] profile from an offset well. This allows recovery of the correct profiles for velocity along the symmetry axis and [Formula: see text]. We conclude that TTI is more ambiguous than VTI for model building. Additional well data or rock-physics assumptions may be required to constrain the tomography and arrive at geologically plausible TTI models. Furthermore, we demonstrate that VTI models with atypical Thomsen parameters can also fit the same joint seismic and check-shot data set. In this case, although imaging with VTI models can focus the TTI data and match vertical event depths, it leads to substantial lateral mispositioning of the reflections.


Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. C65-C79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto V. Oropeza ◽  
George A. McMechan

We have developed a common-reflection-point (CRP)-based kinematic migration velocity analysis for 2D P-wave reflection data to estimate the four transversely isotropic (TI) parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], and the tilt angle [Formula: see text] of the symmetry axis in a TI medium. In each iteration, the tomographic parameter was updated alternately with prestack anisotropic ray-based migration. Iterations initially used layer stripping to reduce the number of degrees of freedom; after convergence was reached, a couple of more iterations over all parameters and all CRPs ensured global interlayer coupling and parameter interaction. The TI symmetry axis orientation was constrained to be locally perpendicular to the reflectors. The [Formula: see text] dominated the inversion, and so it was weighted less than [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the parameter updates. Estimates of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were influenced if the error in [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]; estimates of [Formula: see text] were also influenced if the error in [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]. Examples included data for a simple model with a homogeneous TI layer whose dips allowed recovery of all anisotropy parameters from noise-free data, and a more realistic model (the BP tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) model) for which only [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] were recoverable. The adequacy of the traveltimes predicted by the inverted anisotropic models was tested by comparing migrated images and common image gathers, with those produced using the known velocity models.


Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. D135-D143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawan Dewangan ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin ◽  
Mike Batzle ◽  
Kasper van Wijk ◽  
Matthew Haney

Mode-converted PS-waves can provide critically important information for velocity analysis in transversely isotropic (TI) media. We demonstrate, with physical-modeling data, that the combination of long-spread reflection traveltimes of PP- and PS-waves can be inverted for the parameters of a horizontal TI layer with a tilted symmetry axis. The 2D multicomponent reflection data are acquired over a phenolic sample manufactured to simulate the effective medium formed by steeply dipping fracture sets or shale layers. The reflection moveout of PS-waves in this model is asymmetric with respect to the source and receiver positions, and the moveout-asymmetry attributes play a crucial role in constraining the TI parameters. Applying the modified [Formula: see text] method to the PP and PS traveltimes recorded in the symmetry-axis plane, we compute the time and offset asymmetry attributes of the PS-waves along with the traveltimes of the pure SS reflections. The algorithm of Dewangan and Tsvankin is then used to invert the combination of the moveout attributes of PP-, SS-, and PS-waves for the medium parameters and the thickness of the sample. It should be emphasized that the pure-mode (PP and SS) traveltimes alone are insufficient for the inversion, even if 3D wide-azimuth data are available. Our estimates of the symmetry axis tilt and layer thickness almost coincide with the actual values. The inverted model is also validated by reproducing the results of transmission experiments with both P- and S-wave sources. The transmitted SV wavefield exhibits a prominent cusp (triplication) accurately predicted by the parameter-estimation results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document