Inversion of seismic refraction and reflection data for building long-wavelength velocity models

Geophysics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. R81-R93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyang Wang ◽  
Satish C. Singh ◽  
Francois Audebert ◽  
Henri Calandra
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Short Wavelength ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Density Model ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Reflected Waves ◽  
Long Wavelength ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Computation Efficiency ◽  
Refracted Waves

Long-wavelength velocity model building is a nonlinear process. It has traditionally been achieved without appealing to wave-equation-based approaches for combined refracted and reflected waves. We developed a cascaded wave-equation tomography method in the data domain, taking advantage of the information contained in the reflected and refracted waves. The objective function was the traveltime residual that maximized the crosscorrelation function between real and synthetic data. To alleviate the nonlinearity of the inversion problem, refracted waves were initially used to provide vertical constraints on the velocity model, and reflected waves were then included to provide lateral constraints. The use of reflected waves required scale separation. We separated the long- and short-wavelength subsurface structures into velocity and density models, respectively. The velocity model update was restricted to long wavelengths during the wave-equation tomography, whereas the density model was used to absorb all the short-wavelength impedance contrasts. To improve the computation efficiency, the density model was converted into the zero-offset traveltime domain, where it was invariant to changes of the long-wavelength velocity model. After the wave-equation tomography has derived an optimized long-wavelength velocity model, full-waveform inversion was used to invert all the data to retrieve the short-wavelength velocity structures. We developed our method in two synthetic tests and then applied it to a marine field data set. We evaluated the results of the use of refracted and reflected waves, which was critical for accurately building the long-wavelength velocity model. We showed that our wave-equation tomography strategy was robust for the real data application.

Joint wave-equation traveltime inversion of diving/direct and reflected waves for the P- and S-wave velocity macromodel building

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-145
Author(s):  
Zhiming Ren ◽  
Qianzong Bao ◽  
Bingluo Gu
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Direct Wave ◽  
Reflected Waves ◽  
Traveltime Inversion ◽  
Long Wavelength ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Reflected Wave ◽  
Background Models

Full waveform inversion (FWI) suffers from the local minima problem and requires a sufficiently accurate starting model to converge to the correct solution. Wave-equation traveltime inversion (WETI) is an effective tool to retrieve the long-wavelength components of the velocity model. We develop a joint diving/direct and reflected wave WETI (JDRWETI) method to build the P- and S-wave velocity macromodels. We estimate the traveltime shifts of seismic events (diving/direct waves, PP and PS reflections) through the dynamic warping scheme and construct a misfit function using both the time shifts of diving/direct and reflected waves. We derive the adjoint wave equations and the gradients with respect to the background models based on the joint misfit function. We apply the kernel decomposition scheme to extract the kernel of the diving/direct wave and the tomography kernels of PP and PS reflections. For an explosive source, the kernels of diving/direct wave and PP reflections and the kernel of PS reflections are used to compute the P- and S-wave gradients of the background models, respectively. We implement JDRWETI by a two-stage inversion workflow: first invert the P- and S-wave velocity models using the P-wave gradients and then improve the S-wave velocity model using the S-wave gradients. Numerical tests on synthetic and field datasets reveal that the JDRWETI method successfully recovers the long-wavelength components of P- and S-wave velocity models, which can be used for an initial model for the subsequent elastic FWI. Moreover, the proposed JDRWETI method prevails over the existing reflection WETI method and the cascaded diving/direct and reflected wave WETI method, especially when large velocity errors are present in the shallow part of the starting models. The JDRWETI method with the two-stage inversion workflow can give rise to reasonable inversion results even for the model with different P- and S-wave velocity structures.

Full-traveltime inversion

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. R261-R274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Luo ◽  
Yue Ma ◽  
Yan Wu ◽  
Hongwei Liu ◽  
Lei Cao
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
New Wave ◽  
Severe Problem ◽  
Reflected Waves ◽  
Traveltime Inversion ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Kinematic Information

Many previously published wave-equation-based methods, which attempt to automatically invert traveltime or kinematic information in seismic data or migrated gathers for smooth velocities, suffer a common and severe problem — the inversions are involuntarily and unconsciously hijacked by amplitude information. To overcome this problem, we have developed a new wave-equation-based traveltime inversion methodology, referred to as full-traveltime (i.e., fully dependent on traveltime) inversion (FTI), to automatically estimate a kinematically accurate velocity model from seismic data. The key idea of FTI is to make the inversion fully dependent on traveltime information, and thus prevent amplitude interference during inversion. Under the assumption that velocity perturbations cause only traveltime changes, we have derived the FTI method in the data and image domains, which are applicable to transmitted arrivals and reflected waves, respectively. FTI does not require an accurate initial velocity model or low-frequency seismic data. Synthetic and field data tests demonstrate that FTI produces satisfactory inversion results, even when using constant velocity models as initials.

Tomographic modeling of a cross‐borehole data set

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1249-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R. Lines ◽  
Edward D. LaFehr
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Ray Tracing ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Survey ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Data Set ◽  
True Solution ◽  
Velocity Models

In this paper we describe a methodology for estimating P‐wave velocities from a cross‐borehole seismic survey that uses straight‐ray tomography, ray tracing, and finite‐difference wave‐equation modeling to produce velocity models that fit the first‐break traveltimes. After a starting model is established by straight‐ray tomography, the velocity model is checked by ray tracing and wave‐equation modeling. Since the models for each procedure show consistent results and the modeled traveltimes closely match those traveltimes from the actual data, we felt our interpretation was confirmed. However, the fitting of cross‐well first break traveltimes is only a necessary validity check and is not sufficient to guarantee that the true solution has been found. Two wells were drilled through the areas that were anomalous on the derived tomogram and check‐shot velocity surveys were run. Due primarily to a lateral ambiguity in velocity estimation caused by too few near‐vertical raypaths, the check‐shot surveys did not agree with the tomogram velocities. However, subsequently the check‐shot traveltimes were used to place bounds on velocity in a constrained least‐squares procedure; the combined modeling of uphole and cross‐well rays produced an optimum velocity model which satisfies all available data.

scholarly journals Mitigating elastic effects in marine 3-D full-waveform inversion

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (3) ◽  
pp. 2089-2104
Author(s):  
Òscar Calderón Agudo ◽  
Nuno Vieira da Silva ◽  
George Stronge ◽  
Michael Warner
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Acoustic Wave Equation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Full Waveform

SUMMARY The potential of full-waveform inversion (FWI) to recover high-resolution velocity models of the subsurface has been demonstrated in the last decades with its application to field data. But in certain geological scenarios, conventional FWI using the acoustic wave equation fails in recovering accurate models due to the presence of strong elastic effects, as the acoustic wave equation only accounts for compressional waves. This becomes more critical when dealing with land data sets, in which elastic effects are generated at the source and recorded directly by the receivers. In marine settings, in which sources and receivers are typically within the water layer, elastic effects are weaker but can be observed most easily as double mode conversions and through their effect on P-wave amplitudes. Ignoring these elastic effects can have a detrimental impact on the accuracy of the recovered velocity models, even in marine data sets. Ideally, the elastic wave equation should be used to model wave propagation, and FWI should aim to recover anisotropic models of velocity for P waves (vp) and S waves (vs). However, routine three-dimensional elastic FWI is still commercially impractical due to the elevated computational cost of modelling elastic wave propagation in regions with low S-wave velocity near the seabed. Moreover, elastic FWI using local optimization methods suffers from cross-talk between different inverted parameters. This generally leads to incorrect estimation of subsurface models, requiring an estimate of vp/vs that is rarely known beforehand. Here we illustrate how neglecting elasticity during FWI for a marine field data set that contains especially strong elastic heterogeneities can lead to an incorrect estimation of the P-wave velocity model. We then demonstrate a practical approach to mitigate elastic effects in 3-D yielding improved estimates, consisting of using a global inversion algorithm to estimate a model of vp/vs, employing matching filters to remove elastic effects from the field data, and performing acoustic FWI of the resulting data set. The quality of the recovered models is assessed by exploring the continuity of the events in the migrated sections and the fit of the latter with the recovered velocity model.

Frequency-domain wave-equation traveltime inversion with a monofrequency component

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. R913-R926
Author(s):  
Jianhua Wang ◽  
Jizhong Yang ◽  
Liangguo Dong ◽  
Yuzhu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Frequency Domain ◽  
Time Domain ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Receiver Side ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Traveltime Inversion ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
The Time Domain

Wave-equation traveltime inversion (WTI) is a useful tool for background velocity model building. It is generally formulated and implemented in the time domain, in which the gradient is calculated by temporally crosscorrelating the source- and receiver-side wavefields. The time-domain source-side snapshots are either stored in memory or are reconstructed through back propagation. The memory requirements and computational cost of WTI are thus prohibitively expensive, especially for 3D applications. To partially alleviate this problem, we provide an implementation of WTI in the frequency domain with a monofrequency component. Because only one frequency is used, it is affordable to directly store the source- and receiver-side wavefields in memory. There is no need for wavefield reconstruction during gradient calculation. In such a way, we have dramatically reduced the memory requirements and computational cost compared with the traditional time-domain WTI realization. For practical implementation, the frequency-domain wavefield is calculated by time-domain finite-difference forward modeling and is transformed to the frequency domain by an on-the-fly discrete Fourier transform. Numerical examples on a simple lateral periodic velocity model and the Marmousi model demonstrate that our method can obtain accurate background velocity models comparable with those from time-domain WTI and frequency-domain WTI with multiple frequencies. A field data set test indicates that our method obtains a background velocity model that well predicts the seismic wave traveltime.

Two robust imaging methodologies for challenging environments: Wave-equation dispersion inversion of surface waves and guided waves and supervirtual interferometry + tomography for far-offset refractions

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. SM27-SM37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Kai Lu ◽  
Sherif Hanafy ◽  
Gerard Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Velocity Distribution ◽  
Surface Waves ◽  
Guided Waves ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Dispersion Curves ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Head Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Velocity Models

Two robust imaging technologies are reviewed that provide subsurface geologic information in challenging environments. The first one is wave-equation dispersion (WD) inversion of surface waves and guided waves (GW) for the shear-velocity (S-wave) and compressional-velocity (P-wave) models, respectively. The other method is traveltime inversion for the velocity model, in which supervirtual refraction interferometry (SVI) is used to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of far-offset refractions. We have determined the benefits and liabilities of both methods with synthetic seismograms and field data. The benefits of WD are that (1) there is no layered-medium assumption, as there is in conventional inversion of dispersion curves. This means that 2D or 3D velocity models can be accurately estimated from data recorded by seismic surveys over rugged topography, and (2) WD mostly avoids getting stuck in local minima. The liability is that WD for surface waves is almost as expensive as full-waveform inversion (FWI) and, for Rayleigh waves, only recovers the S-velocity distribution to a depth no deeper than approximately 1/2 to 1/3 wavelength of the lowest-frequency surface wave. The limitation for GW is that, for now, it can estimate the P-velocity model by inverting the dispersion curves from GW propagating in near-surface low-velocity zones. Also, WD often requires user intervention to pick reliable dispersion curves. For SVI, the offset of usable refractions can be more than doubled, so that traveltime tomography can be used to estimate a much deeper model of the P-velocity distribution. This can provide a more effective starting velocity model for FWI. The liability is that SVI assumes head-wave first arrivals, not those from strong diving waves.

Nonlinear velocity inversion by a two‐step Monte Carlo method.

Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Side Jin ◽  
Raul Madariaga
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Nonlinear Inversion ◽  
Ray Theory ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Reference Velocity

Seismic reflection data contain information on small‐scale impedance variations and a smooth reference velocity model. Given a reference velocity model, the reflectors can be obtained by linearized migration‐inversion. If the reference velocity is incorrect, the reflectors obtained by inverting different subsets of the data will be incoherent. We propose to use the coherency of these images to invert for the background velocity distribution. We have developed a two‐step iterative inversion method in which we separate the retrieval of small‐scale variations of the seismic velocity from the longer‐period reference velocity model. Given an initial background velocity model, we use a waveform misfit‐functional for the inversion of small‐scale velocity variations. For this linear step we use the linearized migration‐inversion method based on ray theory that we have recently developed with Lambaré and Virieux. The reference velocity model is then updated by a Monte Carlo inversion method. For the nonlinear inversion of the velocity background, we introduce an objective functional that measures the coherency of the short wavelength components obtained by inverting different common shot gathers at the same locations. The nonlinear functional is calculated directly in migrated data space to avoid expensive numerical forward modeling by finite differences or ray theory. Our method is somewhat similar to an iterative migration velocity analysis, but we do an automatic search for relatively large‐scale 1-D reference velocity models. We apply the nonlinear inversion method to a marine data set from the North Sea and also show that nonlinear inversion can be applied to realistic scale data sets to obtain a laterally heterogeneous velocity model with a reasonable amount of computer time.

Why do Laplace-domain waveform inversions yield long-wavelength results?

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. R167-R173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wansoo Ha ◽  
Changsoo Shin
Keyword(s):  
Short Wavelength ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Moving Average ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Virtual Source ◽  
Laplace Domain ◽  
Long Wavelength ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Gradient Direction ◽  
Domain Inversion

Laplace-domain inversions generate long-wavelength velocity models from synthetic and field data sets, unlike full-waveform inversions in the time or frequency domain. By examining the gradient directions of Laplace-domain inversions, we explain why they result in long-wavelength velocity models. The gradient direction of the inversion is calculated by multiplying the virtual source and the back-propagated wavefield. The virtual source has long-wavelength features because it is the product of the smooth forward-modeled wavefield and the partial derivative of the impedance matrix, which depends on the long-wavelength initial velocity used in the inversion. The back-propagated wavefield exhibits mild variations, except for near the receiver, in spite of the short-wavelength components in the residual. The smooth back-propagated wavefield results from the low-wavenumber pass-filtering effects of Laplace-domain Green’s function, which attenuates the high-wavenumber components of the residuals more rapidly than the low-wavenumber components. Accordingly, the gradient direction and the inversion results are smooth. Examples of inverting field data acquired in the Gulf of Mexico exhibit long-wavelength gradients and confirm the generation of long-wavelength velocity models by Laplace-domain inversion. The inversion of moving-average filtered data without short-wavelength features shows that the Laplace-domain inversion is not greatly affected by the high-wavenumber components in the field data.

Deep learning-driven velocity model building workflow

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 872a1-872a9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Araya-Polo ◽  
Stuart Farris ◽  
Manuel Florez
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Generative Adversarial Network ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Velocity Models

Exploration seismic data are heavily manipulated before human interpreters are able to extract meaningful information regarding subsurface structures. This manipulation adds modeling and human biases and is limited by methodological shortcomings. Alternatively, using seismic data directly is becoming possible thanks to deep learning (DL) techniques. A DL-based workflow is introduced that uses analog velocity models and realistic raw seismic waveforms as input and produces subsurface velocity models as output. When insufficient data are used for training, DL algorithms tend to overfit or fail. Gathering large amounts of labeled and standardized seismic data sets is not straightforward. This shortage of quality data is addressed by building a generative adversarial network (GAN) to augment the original training data set, which is then used by DL-driven seismic tomography as input. The DL tomographic operator predicts velocity models with high statistical and structural accuracy after being trained with GAN-generated velocity models. Beyond the field of exploration geophysics, the use of machine learning in earth science is challenged by the lack of labeled data or properly interpreted ground truth, since we seldom know what truly exists beneath the earth's surface. The unsupervised approach (using GANs to generate labeled data)illustrates a way to mitigate this problem and opens geology, geophysics, and planetary sciences to more DL applications.

Migration moveout analysis and depth focusing

Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude F. Lafond ◽  
Alan R. Levander
Keyword(s):  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Tomographic Reconstruction ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Velocity Models

Prestack depth migration still suffers from the problems associated with building appropriate velocity models. The two main after‐migration, before‐stack velocity analysis techniques currently used, depth focusing and residual moveout correction, have found good use in many applications but have also shown their limitations in the case of very complex structures. To address this issue, we have extended the residual moveout analysis technique to the general case of heterogeneous velocity fields and steep dips, while keeping the algorithm robust enough to be of practical use on real data. Our method is not based on analytic expressions for the moveouts and requires no a priori knowledge of the model, but instead uses geometrical ray tracing in heterogeneous media, layer‐stripping migration, and local wavefront analysis to compute residual velocity corrections. These corrections are back projected into the velocity model along raypaths in a way that is similar to tomographic reconstruction. While this approach is more general than existing migration velocity analysis implementations, it is also much more computer intensive and is best used locally around a particularly complex structure. We demonstrate the technique using synthetic data from a model with strong velocity gradients and then apply it to a marine data set to improve the positioning of a major fault.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document