scholarly journals Community treatment orders in the UK 5 years on: a repeat national survey of psychiatrists

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritz DeRidder ◽  
Andrew Molodynski ◽  
Catherine Manning ◽  
Pearse McCusker ◽  
Jorun Rugkåsa
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Previous Survey ◽  
Community Treatment Orders ◽  
The Uk

Aims and methodCommunity treatment orders (CTOs) are increasingly embedded into UK practice and their use continues to rise. However, they remain highly controversial. We surveyed psychiatrists to establish their experiences and current opinions of using CTOs and to compare findings with our previous survey conducted in 2010.ResultsThe opinions of psychiatrists in the UK have not changed since 2010 in spite of recent evidence questioning the effectiveness of CTOs. Clinical factors (the need for engagement and treatment adherence, and the achievement of adherence and improved insight) remain the most important considerations in initiating and discharging a CTO.Clinical implicationsGiven the accumulating evidence from research and clinical practice that CTOs do not improve outcomes, it is concerning that psychiatrists' opinions have not altered in response, particularly given the implications for patient care.

scholarly journals Community treatment orders and their use in the UK

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Compulsory Treatment ◽  
Ethical Considerations ◽  
Community Treatment Orders ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
The Uk

SummaryDespite the lack of supportive scientific evidence, the uptake of community treatment orders (CTOs) in England and Wales since their introduction in late 2008 has been higher than expected, although there has been a relative dearth of second opinion appointed doctors. In Scotland, CTOs now constitute about 30% of all long-term civil detentions, with lack of insight and lack of treatment adherence given as the major reasons for CTO use. Ethical considerations such as balancing autonomy against health needs will continue to be weighed by clinicians considering compulsory treatment in the community.

scholarly journals Community treatment orders in England and Wales: national survey of clinicians' views and use

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 328-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Manning ◽  
Andrew Molodynski ◽  
Jorun Rugkåsa ◽  
John Dawson ◽  
Tom Burns
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Community Treatment Orders ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
And Training

Aims and methodTo ascertain the views and experiences of psychiatrists in England and Wales regarding community treatment orders (CTOs). We mailed 1928 questionnaires to members of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.ResultsIn total, 566 usable surveys were returned, providing a 29% response rate. Respondents were generally positive about the introduction of the new powers, more so than in previous UK studies. They reported that their decision-making regarding compulsion was based largely on clinical grounds.Clinical implicationsIn the absence of research evidence or a professional consensus about the use of CTOs, multidisciplinary input in decision-making is essential. Further research and training are urgently needed.

scholarly journals Cognitive therapy training for psychiatrists: impact on individual clinical practice

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 117-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Swift ◽  
I. Durkin ◽  
C. Beuster
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cognitive Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Previous Survey ◽  
Therapy Training ◽  
Training And Supervision ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Therapy Sessions

Aims and MethodWe aimed to survey how psychiatrists with in-depth training in cognitive therapy use these skills. A postal questionnaire based on a previous survey was sent to all psychiatrists who are accredited members of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies.ResultsThere was a 94% response rate. Psychiatrists in non-psychotherapy posts used formal cognitive therapy, with an average of 20% of new patients compared with 65% for those in psychotherapy posts, and were less satisfied with the extent to which they were able to use their skills (20%v. 80%). A total of 85% of respondents described themselves as being involved in teaching, training and supervision of cognitive therapy.Clinical ImplicationsUnless psychiatrists are planning on working in specialised psychotherapy posts, they are unlikely to use cognitive therapy training in formal therapy sessions. Further research is needed to determine whether cognitive therapy training for psychiatrists translates into improved outcomes for patients.

scholarly journals P05 A national survey of clinical practice of corticosteroid use in newly diagnosed or flaring cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis across the UK

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Jones ◽  
Dannii Clayton ◽  
Gloria Nkhoma ◽  
Frances Sherratt ◽  
Matthew Peak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rapid Induction ◽  
Systemic Jia ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background Background Corticosteroids (CS) are widely used for rapid-action or induction treatment in children and young people (CYP) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Given a lack of evidence base on CS induction regimen for CYP with JIA, and since criteria for choosing CS are based on healthcare professional (HCP) preference, further research is needed (1). Methods A national electronic survey was undertaken among HCPs across the UK as part of the Steroid Induction Regimen for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SIRJIA) study. We aimed to establish the opinions of HCPs current practice regarding the clinical criteria for commencing CS treatment Results A total of 39 (24%) responses were received from 162 HCPs. These included 22 (56%) NHS consultants, five (13%) grid trainees, eight (21%) clinical nurse specialists and four other HCPs (10%). The most common treatments newly diagnosed JIA or a disease flare were intra-articular IACS or a combination of DMARDs and IAS (except for systemic JIA and oligoarticular JIA). The majority of HCPs 17 would treat new and flaring CYP the same with 53% choosing a different regime or not answering. The key criteria HCPs used for commencing CS and choosing route of administration were rapid induction of remission (31 (89%)), high disease activity (31 (89%)), severity of systemic JIA (30 (86%)) and level of inflammation (28 (80%)), see Table 1. The main determinants of route of administration was disease severity disease subtype. The majority of HCPs (52-72%) would consider entering CYP with JIA into a trial randomising to modes of administration. P14 Table 1 Reasons of CS Choice Number N = 39 Percentage % High Disease Activity 35 89.7 Rapid induction of remission 34 87.18 Severity of Systemic JIA 34 87.18 Level of inflammation 32 82.5 Severe Uveitis 30 76.92 JIA subtype 27 68.21 Targeting Specific Joints 26 66.67 Level of Disability 18 46.15 Level of pain 16 41.03 Long-standing Disease 11 28.1 Patient reluctance to take DMARDS 8 20.5 Conclusion The results from this national survey of clinical practice showed varying practices in the management of new CYP with JIA and those that are flaring. The majority of HCPs who completed this survey, indicated that they would be prepared to consider entering CYP into a trial that randomised to the four CS delivery methods. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Community treatment orders and mental health social work: Issues for policy and practice in the UK and Ireland

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Campbell ◽  
Gavin Davidson ◽  
Pearse McCusker ◽  
Hannah Jobling ◽  
Tom Slater
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Community Treatment Orders ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
The Uk

Validation of the Security Needs Assessment Profile (SNAP) by a national survey of secure units in England

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffan Davies ◽  
Mick Collins ◽  
Chris Ashwell
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Needs Assessment ◽  
National Health ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Security Requirements ◽  
Clinical Implications

Aims and methodThe Security Needs Assessment Profile (SNAP) was developed to provide a detailed description of individual patient's security requirements in the then Trent Region of England. A national survey of secure units was undertaken to examine the content validity of the item structure of SNAP and revise the item definitions to reflect more broadly based clinical practice. A follow-up survey sought views on the usefulness of SNAP in clinical practice.ResultsThirty-five secure units from National Health Service and independent sector providers participated. No new security items were generated. All the item definitions were reviewed, many amended, and a small number revised extensively. Units' security profiles were rated on the original and revised instruments.Clinical implicationsThe revised SNAP has been shown to be generalisable across secure services in England; 92% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that SNAP would be useful in providing a structured security needs assessment.

scholarly journals Treatment adherence and the care programme approach in individuals with eating disorders

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 426-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schmidt ◽  
John F. Morgan ◽  
Farida Yousaf
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Support Group ◽  
Service Level ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Formal Care ◽  
Care Programme ◽  
Improve Treatment ◽  
The Uk

Aims and MethodTo examine service-level variables predicting treatment adherence in a specialist eating disorder unit. We analysed a sample of 157 individuals consecutively referred to the unit over an 18-month period. Associations were determined using odds ratios.ResultsIndividuals with a formal care programme at the point of referral were more likely to stay in treatment. Treatment adherence was not predicted by illness severity or waiting time. Follow-up by a dietician and acceptance of referral to a support group predicted better treatment outcomes.Clinical ImplicationsAlthough the standard care programme approach may be relinquished in the UK, we recommend that this approach or its equivalent be used in specialist eating disorder services to improve treatment adherence.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 upon the delivery of exercise services within cystic fibrosis clinics in the United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen W Tomlinson ◽  
Zoe L Saynor ◽  
Daniel Stevens ◽  
Don Urquhart ◽  
Craig A Williams
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Exercise Training ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Future Practice

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedent change to clinical practice. As the impact upon delivery of exercise services for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the UK was unknown, this was characterised via a national survey. In total, 31 CF centres participated. Principal findings included a significant reduction in exercise testing, and widespread adaptation to deliver exercise training using telehealth methods. Promisingly, 71% stated that they would continue to use virtual methods of engaging patients in future practice. This does, however, highlight a need to develop sustainable and more standardised telehealth services further to manage patients moving forwards.

Community treatment order legislation in the Commonwealth

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Outpatient Treatment ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Community Treatment Orders ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Treatment Order ◽  
Community Treatment Order

This chapter provides an overview of legislation governing the use of community treatment orders (CTOs)—that authorize compulsory outpatient treatment—in the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. It focuses particularly on the cluster of powers that CTOs confer on community mental health teams, permitting them to continue supervising a person’s outpatient care. It covers the criteria, procedures, and structure of authority for a CTO, the conditions such an order can impose on a person’s community care, the role of statutory treatment plans, and the powers available to enforce the outpatient treatment regime, especially the power of recall to hospital—analysing and comparing the subtly different regimes enacted in these Commonwealth nations that share a common law tradition.

scholarly journals Community treatment orders in England: review of usage from national data

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susham Gupta ◽  
Elvan U. Akyuz ◽  
Toby Baldwin ◽  
David Curtis
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Psychiatric Service ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Economic Downturn ◽  
National Data ◽  
Community Treatment Orders ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Low Rate

Aims and methodCommunity treatment orders (CTOs) have been in used in England and Wales since November 2008; however, their effectiveness has been debated widely, as has the question of which methodology is appropriate to investigate them. This paper uses national data to explore the use of CTOs in England.ResultsAbout 5500 patients are subject to CTOs at any one time. Each year, ~4500 patients are made subject to a CTO each year and ~2500 are fully discharged, usually by the responsible clinician; fewer than half of CTO patients are recalled, and two-thirds of recalls end in revocation. The low rate of CTO discharges by mental health tribunals (below 5%) suggests that they are not used inappropriately.Clinical implicationsThe introduction of CTOs in England has coincided with a reduction in psychiatric service provision due to the economic downturn. Pressures on services might be even more severe if patients currently subject to CTOs instead needed to be detained as in-patients.Declaration of interestNone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document