Randomized Study on Dose Escalation in Definitive Chemoradiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer (ARTDECO Study)

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.03697
Author(s):  
Maarten C. C. M. Hulshof ◽  
Elisabeth D. Geijsen ◽  
Tom Rozema ◽  
Vera Oppedijk ◽  
Jeroen Buijsen ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To analyze the effect of radiation dose escalation to the primary tumor on local tumor control in definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) for patients with esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with medically inoperable and/or irresectable esophageal carcinoma, referred for dCRT, were randomly assigned between a standard dose (SD) of 50.4 Gy/1.8 Gy for 5.5 weeks to the tumor and regional lymph nodes and a high dose (HD) up to a total dose of 61.6 Gy to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy consisted of courses of concurrent carboplatin (area under the curve 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) in both arms once a week for 6 weeks. The primary end point was local progression-free survival. RESULTS Between September 2012 and June 2018, 260 patients were included. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was present in 61% of patients, and 39% had adenocarcinoma (AC). Radiation treatment was completed by 94%, and 85% had at least five courses of chemotherapy. The median follow-up time for all patients was 50 months. The 3-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 70% in the SD arm versus 73% in the HD arm (not significant). The LPFS for SCC and AC was 75% versus 79% and 61% versus 61% for SD and HD, respectively (not significant). The 3-year locoregional progression-free survival was 52% and 59% for the SD and HD arms, respectively ( P = .08). Overall, grade 4 and 5 common toxicity criteria were 12% and 5% in the SD arm versus 14% and 10% in the HD arm, respectively ( P = .15). CONCLUSION In dCRT for esophageal cancer, radiation dose escalation up to 61.6 Gy to the primary tumor did not result in a significant increase in local control over 50.4 Gy. The absence of a dose effect was observed in both AC and SCC.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 281-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten C.C.M. Hulshof ◽  
Debby Geijsen ◽  
Tom Rozema ◽  
Vera Oppedijk ◽  
Jeroen Buijsen ◽  
...  

281 Background: To analyze the effect of radiation dose escalation to the primary tumor on local control, locoregional control, survival and toxicity in definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T2-4, N0-3, M0 carcinoma of the esophagus were randomized between a standard dose of 50.4 Gy/1.8 Gy/5,5 weeks to the tumor and regional lymph nodes (SD) versus the same dose combined with an integrated boost of 0,4 Gy per fraction (total 61,6 Gy) to the primary tumor (HD). Chemotherapy consisted of 6 weekly concurrent carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) in both arms. The primary endpoint was local progression free survival (LPFS) and 260 patients were needed to detect a difference of 15% (power: 80%). Secondary endpoints were locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Patients were stratified for histological subtype. Results: Between September 2012 and June 2018, 260 patients were included. Reasons for inoperability were proximal localization and patient preference (44%), comorbidity (30%), unresectable lymph nodes (11%), T4 (5%), local recurrence 2% and combinations (7%). 61% of the patients had a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 39% had an adenocarcinoma (AC). 94% completed radiation treatment and 85% had at least 5 courses chemotherapy. Median follow up time was 45 months. 3-year LPFS was 70% in the SD arm versus 76% in the HD arm (ns). LPFS for SCC and AC was 74% versus 81% and 62% versus 65% for SD and HD, resp. (ns). 3-year LRPFS was 53% and 63% for the SD and HD arm resp. (p = 0.08). 1 year any progression free survival was 60% for SCC and 50% for AC, without a significant difference between SD and HD (p = 0,5). 3-year OS was 41% versus 40% for SD and HD resp. Overall grade 4 and 5 CTC toxicity was 12% and 4% in the SD arm versus 14% and 10% in the HD arm, resp. Conclusions: In definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer, radiation dose escalation up to 61,6 Gy to the primary tumor did not result in a significant increase in local control over 50,4 Gy. Numerical improvement of locoregional control after HD was observed with an increase in toxicity and without improving OS. Clinical trial information: NL38343.018.11.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5020-5020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuoc T. Tran ◽  
C. Leigh Moyer ◽  
Ryan Phillips ◽  
Noura Radwan ◽  
Ashley Ross ◽  
...  

5020 Background: The importance of local treatment in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPC) is unknown. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is highly focused, high-dose radiation that is well suited for treatment of oligometastases. Here we report on the safety and preliminary clinical outcomes of SABR in a modern cohort of OPC men. Methods: Eighty four men who satisfied criteria of OPC diagnosed on imaging underwent consolidative SABR were then followed prospectively on our IRB approved registry by our GU multidisciplinary team. We collected demographic, clinical, toxicity and efficacy information. We examined the first 66 men in this preliminary report to allow for a minimum of 4.5 months follow-up. SABR was delivered in 1-5 fractions of 5-18 Gy. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess local progression-free survival (LPFS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS; PSA nadir+2), distant progression free survival (DPFS), ADT-free survival (ADT-FS) and time-to-next intervention (TTNI). Results: Of the 66 OPC patients analyzed, 25 (38%) men presented as synchronous OPC and the remaining 41 had recurrent OPC. Median and mean follow-up was 61 and 66 weeks, respectively. Patient and disease factors as listed in the Table. Crude Grade 1 and 2 acute toxicities were 36% and 11%, respectively, with no Grade > 2 toxicity. SABR was delivered to 134 metastases: 89 bone (66%), 40 nodal (30%) and 5 (4%) visceral metastases. Overall LPFS at 1-year was 92%. The bPFS and DPFS at 1-year were 69% and 69%, respectively. Median TTNI was not reached yet. Of the 18 men with hormone sensitive prostate cancer who had their ADT deferred, 11/18 (56%) remain free of disease following SABR (1-year ADT-FS was 78%) and in 17 castration resistant men, 11 had > 50% PSA declines with 1-year TTNI of 30% with a median of 45 weeks. Conclusions: Consolidative SABRfor OPCis feasible and well tolerated. The preliminary clinical outcomes in our series is limited by heterogeneity and size but our data suggests that this approach is worthy of further prospective study. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13022-e13022
Author(s):  
T. Iuchi ◽  
K. Hatano ◽  
T. Sakaida ◽  
S. Hirono

e13022 Backgrounds: We previously have reported that hypo-fractionated high-dose irradiation (HdI; 68Gy/8F) showed excellent local control but no effect on prevention of cerebrospinal fluid dissemination (CSFd), resulted in limited efficacy on patients’ survival in glioblastoma (GBM). The aim of present analysis is to evaluate the clinical significance of prophylactic intrathecal administration of thiotepa (iT) in the treatment of GBM patients. Methods: Histologically confirmed GBMs without CSFd at diagnosis were enrolled. Patients were classified into four groups owing to the post-surgical treatment strategy as follows: Group A patients (n = 65) were treated by conventional radiotherapy (cRT; 60Gy/30F) alone; Group B patients (n = 17) were by cRT concurrent witn iT; Group C patients (n = 28) were by HdI alone; Group D patients (n = 30) were by HdI concurrent with iT. In Group B and D, Ommaya reservoir was placed into the lateral ventricle and 10mg of thiotepa was administrated weekly after surgery for five times. The local progression-free survival (PFS), CSFd-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared in these four groups. Results: Group C and D patients showed significantly longer PFS than Group A and B (p < 0.0001), suggesting the clinical significance of HdI for local control of this tumor. On the other hand, CFS in Group B and D was significantly longer than that in Group A and C (p = 0.049), demonstrating the effect of iT for prevention of CSFd. However, significant improvement of OS on the conventional treatment (Group A, median OS: 12.3 months) was observed only in Group D (median OS: 30.2 months, p = 0.002) and not in Group B or C (24 months, p = 0.135, and 14.9 months, p = 0.481 respectively). Conclusions: These data indicated that both of local control and prevention of CSFd were required for better survival of patients with GBM, and iT concurrent with HdI may be one of the treatments that fill these requirements. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6193
Author(s):  
Jian-Yue Jin ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Ying Xiao ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Rebecca Paulus ◽  
...  

Background: We hypothesized that the Effective radiation Dose to the Immune Cells (EDIC) in circulating blood is a significant factor for the treatment outcome in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This is a secondary study of a phase III trial, NRG/RTOG 0617, in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with radiation-based treatment. The EDIC was computed as equivalent uniform dose to the entire blood based on radiation doses to all blood-containing organs, with consideration of blood flow and fractionation effect. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS). The EDIC–survival relationship was analyzed with consideration of clinical significant factors. Results: A total of 456 patients were eligible. The median EDIC values were 5.6 Gy (range, 2.1–12.2 Gy) and 6.3 Gy (2.1–11.6 Gy) for the low- and high-dose groups, respectively. The EDIC was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.12, p = 0.005) and LPFS (HR = 1.09, p = 0.02) but PFS (HR = 1.05, p = 0.17) after adjustment for tumor dose, gross tumor volume and other factors. OS decreased with an increasing EDIC in a non-linear pattern: the two-year OS decreased first with a slope of 8%/Gy when the EDIC < 6 Gy, remained relatively unchanged when the EDIC was 6–8 Gy, and followed by a further reduction with a slope of 12%/Gy when the EDIC > 8 Gy. Conclusions: The EDIC is a significant independent risk factor for poor OS and LPFS in RTOG 0617 patients with stage III NSCLC, suggesting that radiation dose to circulating immune cells is critical for tumor control. Organ at risk for the immune system should be considered during RT plan.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2765-2765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Gyung Goh ◽  
Saengsuree Jootar ◽  
Hyeoung-Joon Kim ◽  
Sang Kyun Sohn ◽  
Joon Seong Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2765 In CML, achievement of major molecular response (MMR) is a significant prognostic factor as it has been shown to be associated with longer duration of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and long-term progression-free survival. In IRIS study, patients who achieved both CCyR and MMR showed higher progression-free survival rates, compared to those who had CCyR without MMR. Higher doses of imatinib are expected to yield higher CCyR and MMR rates, compared to standard dose of imatinib, and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, nilotinib also produces high CCyR and MMR rates in patients with CP CML who are resistant to imatinib. In this prospective study, the efficacy of nilotinib and high-dose imatinib was investigated in suboptimal molecular responders who received standard-dose imatinib as first-line therapy. Early CP CML patients who have achieved CCyR but no MMR after at least 18 months and up to 24 months (≥ 18 to ≤ 24 months) on first-line imatinib therapy at a daily dose of 400 mg were enrolled in this clinical trial, and informed consents were obtained from all patients prior to participation. In nilotinib arm, patients received oral dose of 400 mg BID (800 mg/day), and patients received 800 mg/day administrated as 400 mg BID in imatinib dose-escalation arm. To assess the drug efficacy, cytogenetics and RQ-PCR analysis were performed at regular intervals, and baseline mutational analysis was conducted for every patient with subsequent mutational analyses performed in patients demonstrating either lack of response or disease progression. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the cumulative MMR rates by 12 months, and secondary endpoints are to evaluate the cumulative CMR rates and time to and duration of MMR and CMR during further 24 month follow-up. Progression-free survival and safety profiles will also be assessed as secondary endpoints. Patients showing lack of response (lack of complete hematologic response (CHR) at 6 months, increasing WBC, no major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at 24 months), loss of response (loss of CHR or MCyR) or severe intolerance to treatment were allowed to crossover to the alternative treatment arm. With a data cut-off date of 18 Jul 2011, a total of 30 patients were randomized into nilotinib arm (n =13) or imatinib arm (n = 17), and 6 patients have crossed-over to nilotinib arm due to lack of response. With a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 0.2–28 mos), all patients have maintained CCyR without progression to advanced disease, and progressive decrease in BCR-ABL transcript levels was observed in all patients. Cumulative MMR rates at 20 months were significantly higher in nilotinib arm compared to imatinib dose-escalation arm (59.00% vs. 27.40%, P = 0.047), and patients treated with nilotinib also showed faster molecular response rates, with 5 patients achieving MMR within 3 months of nilotinib therapy. At the last follow-up, 7/13 (53.85%) and 2/11 (18.18%) patients achieved MMR in nilotinib arm and in high-dose imatinib arm, respectively, with 1 patient in nilotinib arm achieving 4-log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts. Although toxicity was observed more frequently in imatinib dose-escalation arm, all patients currently maintain the initial dose (except 1 patient who interrupted imatinib therapy due to neurosurgical operation), and based on the toxicity data, no additional or serious adverse events were developed except for pre-existing toxicities before randomization. These preliminary results demonstrate that early intervention using nilotinib or dose escalation of imatinib could be recommended in suboptimal molecular responders, with nilotinib being more preferable. Through further clinical investigation on a large patient population and longer period of observation, efficacy and safety of early intervention of suboptimal molecular response using nilotinib or dose escalation of imatinib will be assessed. Updated data with longer follow-up duration will be presented in the meeting. Disclosures: Woodman: Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Szczudlo:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Novartis: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii325-iii326
Author(s):  
Björn-Ole Juhnke ◽  
Marco Gessi ◽  
Nicolas Ulrich Gerber ◽  
Carsten Friedrich ◽  
Christine Haberler ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Embryonal tumours with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) are highly aggressive tumors, mostly occurring in infants. Published clinical data refer to retrospective cohorts of inhomogeneously treated patients. Here, we describe the outcome of patients, who were prospectively treated within the P-HIT2000-trial, the subsequent HIT2000-interim-registry and earlier HIT-trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen patients from the P-HIT2000-trial (2001–2011), 12 patients from the subsequent HIT2000-interim-registry (2012–2014) and 4 patients from earlier HIT-trials with centrally reviewed neuropathological and molecularly-confirmed diagnosis of ETMR were included. Outcome of 18 patients treated with carboplatin-etoposide-induction followed by tandem-high-dose chemotherapy (“CARBO-ETO+HDCT”) with stage-stratified radiotherapy administered in case of persistant disease, relapse or progression were compared to patients treated with HIT-SKK chemotherapy ± radiotherapy (n=9) or other regimens (n=8). RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 2.9(1.0–5.3) years. Metastases at diagnosis were detected in 9 patients (26%). For the entire cohort of n=35, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 26.7%, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.5%. Five-year OS for patients with CARBO-ETO+HDCT, SKK chemotherapy or other regimens was 44.4%, 13.0% and 0%, respectively (p=0.006). Five-year PFS was 33.3%, 0% and 0%, respectively (p=0.119). Of 10 survivors, n=8 were treated with CARBO-ETO+HDCT; n=4 had craniospinal, n=2 local and n=4 no radiotherapy. Impact of initial gross-total-resection (p=0.231) and non-metastatic disease (p=0.097) was limited. CONCLUSIONS We show improved survival with carboplatin-etoposide-induction followed by tandem-high-dose chemotherapy, indicating that a cure is possible for some patients. However, despite intensive treatment, outcome is unsatisfactory and innovative therapies urgently need to be included in an upfront setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document