Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of Irinotecan Administered as a 96-Hour Infusion Weekly to Adult Cancer Patients

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris H. Takimoto ◽  
Geraldine Morrison ◽  
Nancy Harold ◽  
Mary Quinn ◽  
Brian P. Monahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacologic study of a weekly 96-hour infusion of irinotecan to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, define the toxicity profile, and characterize the clinical pharmacology of irinotecan and its metabolites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 26 adult patients with solid tumors, the duration and dose rate of infusion were escalated in new patients until toxicity was observed. RESULTS: In 11 patients who were treated with irinotecan at 12.5 mg/m2/d for 4 days weekly for 2 of 3 weeks, dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients and grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients. The recommended phase II dose is 10 mg/m2/d for 4 days given weekly for 2 of 3 weeks. At this dose, the steady-state plasma concentration (Css) of total SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) was 6.42 ± 1.10 nmol/L, and the Css of total irinotecan was 28.60 ± 17.78 nmol/L. No patient experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia during any cycle. All other toxicities were mild to moderate. The systemic exposure to SN-38 relative to irinotecan was greater than anticipated, with a molar ratio of the area under the concentration curve (AUC) of SN-38 to irinotecan of 0.24 ± 0.08. One objective response lasting 12 months in duration was observed in a patient with metastatic colon cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of irinotecan of 10 mg/m2/d for 4 days weekly for 2 of 3 weeks was extremely well tolerated. Further efficacy testing of this pharmacologic strategy of administering intermittent low doses of irinotecan is warranted.

Phase I/II trial of combination nab-paclitaxel and pemetrexed in advanced solid tumor patients (pts) with emphasis on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19147-e19147
Author(s):  
Jonathan Riess ◽  
Cheryl Ho ◽  
Angela M. Davies ◽  
Derick Lau ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Early Closure ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

e19147 Background: Despite advances in targeted therapies, there is an ongoing need to develop new and effective cytotoxic drug combinations in NSCLC. Preclinical evaluation has demonstrated additive cytotoxicity of pemetrexed and taxanes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining nab-paclitaxel (nP) and pemetrexed (P) in solid tumors with a focus on NSCLC for the phase II expansion. Methods: A 3+3 dose-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Three dose levels were tested: P 500 mg/m2 day 1 plus nP on day 1 at doses of 180, 220, and 260 mg/m2 every 21 days. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 was defined as: grade 4 platelets or grade 3 platelets with bleeding, neutropenia with fever or documented infection, or other grade ≥ 3 non-heme toxicity. Phase II eligibility included advanced NSCLC, ≤ 2 line prior therapy, PS 0-1, adequate organ function. Primary endpoint for further study was response rate (RR) ≥ 25%. Results: Planned dose escalation during the Phase I portion was completed without reaching the MTD. The RP2D was P 500 mg/m2 and nP 260 mg/m2. The phase II portion accrued 37 pts before early closure due to increasing use of first-line pemetrexed/platinum doublet therapy in non-squamous NSCLC. Phase II patient characteristics: median 63 (45-77); M:F 23:14; median cycles 3. In 31 assessable patients: 5 PR, 12 SD and 14 PD. Efficacy: RR =14%; disease control rate (DCR) = 46%; median survival time (MST) = 8.7 months. Pts in the DCR group had a MST of 15.4 vs 4 months in the PD group (p=0.02). Conclusions: P 500 mg/m2 day 1 with nP 260 mg/m2 was feasible and well tolerated. The phase II component demonstrated activity in second-line therapy of advanced NSCLC. Practice patterns have evolved; so further trials of this regimen are not planned. Clinical trial information: NCT00470548.

Scoop: Multicenter phase I/II trial of BBI608 and pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (EPOC1503).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 107-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Hara ◽  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Tomohiro Nishina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Alternative Hypotheses ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

107 Background: The anti–PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (P) provides response rates of 28-57% in patients (pts) with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) vs 0% in those with non-MSI-H cancers. STAT3 has been previously reported as a potential key driver of immune evasion. This study investigates efficacy and safety for the combination of BBI608 (napabucasin), which blocks phosphorylated STAT3 and downregulates IDO1 and PD-L1, with P, in pts with mCRC. BBI608 480 mg BID with P was determined as the recommended phase II dose in phase I. Methods: Phase II included Cohorts A (MSI-H) and B (non-MSI-H). Pts with mCRC not responding to or intolerant of standard chemotherapies were enrolled. The primary endpoint was immune-related objective response rate (irORR), according to irRECIST. The sample size for Cohort A (10 pts) was derived in an exploratory manner. In Cohort B, assuming null and alternative hypotheses of irORR = 5% and 20% led to an estimated required sample size of 40 pts, with a 1-sided alpha of 5% and power of 90%. Genomic profiles and the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) of colorectal cancer were determined by whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing as previously described. Results: From Feb/2017 to Jun/2018, 10 pts were enrolled in Cohort A and 40 in Cohort B. The irORR was 50% (5 of 10 pts) in Cohort A and 10% (95% CI 2.8 to 23.7) (4 of 40 pts) in Cohort B. Of evaluable 19 pts for CMS classification in Cohort B, CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4 were detected in 3, 6, 4, and 6 cases, respectively. The irORR was 33% (1 of 3 pts), 0% (0 of 6 pts), 25% (1 of 4 pts), 33% (2 of 6 pts) in CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4, respectively. One CMS3 patient with partial response had POLE mutation, while 1 CMS1 and 2 CMS4 pts with partial response did not. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included fever (10%) in Cohort A, and diarrhea (5%) and appetite loss (7.5%) in Cohort B, without unexpected safety signals. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: BBI608 with P showed encouraging anti-tumor activity with acceptable toxicity for non-MSI-H mCRC pts as well as MSI-H mCRC pts. Impact of CMS on the efficacies of this combination warrants further investigation in the additional cohort of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02851004.

Alternating irinotecan with oxaliplatin combined with UFT plus leucovorin (LV) (SCOUT) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): A phase I/II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4084-4084
Author(s):  
H. Sheikh ◽  
J. W. Valle ◽  
K. Palmer ◽  
G. Wilson ◽  
A. Sjursen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Grade 3

4084 Background: The feasibility of UFT (tegafur-uracil) plus LV with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin was investigated in a two-stage, phase I/II, open-label, dose-finding trial in patients with ACRC. The study is now closed. Here we present results from the phase II cohort and overall results from the phase I/II study. Methods: Eligible patients aged =18 years had histologically confirmed, advanced, inoperable, measurable metastatic disease, no prior chemotherapy other than adjuvant bolus 5-FU administered =6 months previously, and adequate hematologic, hepatobiliary, and renal function. Patients in the phase I study received irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on d1, oxaliplatin 85–100 mg/m2 on d15 plus UFT 200–300 mg/m2/d with LV 90 mg/d on d1–21 of a 28-d cycle. Diarrhea, lethargy, and vomiting were dose limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) established was irinotecan 180 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, UFT 250 mg/m2/d, and LV 90 mg/day. Patients were treated at the MTD in the phase II study. Primary endpoints in the phase II study were objective response rate (ORR) and time to progression (TTP). Results: Forty-five patients (median age 62 [range 24–79] years, median 4 marker lesions) were entered, 16 and 29 patients in the phase I and II studies, respectively. The ORR in all 38 evaluable patients was 66% (95% CI 49–80%), with clinical benefit (CB) in 89% (95% CI 75–97%). At a median follow-up of 10.3 months, median TTP was 8.5 months (95% CI -7.6 to 10.4 months) in 40 evaluable patients and median OS (ITT population; n=45) was 16.8 months (95% CI -11.3 to 28.3 months). In the phase II study (n=29) median TTP was 8.1 months (95% CI -6.7 to 11.3 months) and median OS was 19.6 months (95% CI -7.7 to >25.6 months); ORR in 25 evaluable patients was 68% (95% CI -46.5 to 85.1%) with CB in 100% (95% CI -86.3 to 100%). Of 30 patients with confirmed radiologic progression, 21 (70%) had second-line therapy. At the MTD, 3 patients (10%) had grade 3 diarrhea, 1 patient (3%) had grade 3 neurotoxicity, and 2 patients (7%) had grade 2 alopecia. No hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was seen. Conclusions: UFT plus LV with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin is an efficacious first-line treatment for patients with ACRC, with minimal alopecia and neurotoxicity and no HFS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I/II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
Hiroki Hara ◽  
Takuro Mizukami ◽  
Keiko Minashi ◽  
Tomohiro Nishina ◽  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

210 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) or irinotecan is a treatment option in the heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with the limited efficacy. Thus, we investigated the recommended dose of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and irinotecan for these patients. Methods: Patients who refractory to fluoropyrimidine, platinum and taxane were enrolled into four cohorts (Level 1A/1B/2A/2B) used a escalated dose of irinotecan [100 (Level 1) or 125 mg/m2 (Level 2) on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day schedule] with 2 dosage schedules of FTD/TPI:35 mg/m2/dose, twice daily (bid), on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28-day cycle (Level A) or on days 1-5 and days 15-19 of a 28-day cycle (Level B). The primary objectives were the determination of the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for phase I part and the evaluation of disease control rate (DCR) targeting > 55% in all enrolled patients for phase II part. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled from 4 institutions in Japan; 2 at Level 1A, 3 at Level 1B and 6 at Level 2B. DLTs occurred in 2/2 patient at Level 1A (Grade 3 gum infection and Grade 3 febrile neutropenia on Day 29, outside the 28-day DLT assessment period, determined equivalent to DLT), and 2/6 patients at Level 2B (Grade 3 mucositis oral and Grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (90.9%), leukopenia (54.5%), anemia (45.5%) and febrile neutropenia (18.2%). One patient at Level 2B achieved partial response and the DCR was 72.7% (95% CI 39.0- 94.0%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 3.0 months (95% CI 0.92- not reached) and 10.2 months (95% CI 2.2- not reached), respectively. Conclusions: The RP2D was determined to be Level 1B although further investigation to explore optimal regimen is needed. Clinical trial information: UMIN000031346.

Phase I/II study of intermitted erlotinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (WJOG4708L)

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 947-955
Author(s):  
Tatsuo Kimura ◽  
Tomoya Kawaguchi ◽  
Yasutaka Chiba ◽  
Hiroshige Yoshioka ◽  
Katsuya Watanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Preclinical data suggest sequential administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) following chemotherapy may improve efficacy. We hypothesized that intermittent delivery of EGFR-TKI following chemotherapy may increase efficacy. Methods This was a multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study to evaluate the efficacy of intermitted erlotinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with EGFR-negative NSCLC who failed one prior chemotherapy. The phase I primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of erlotinib. Erlotinib was administered orally once per day on days 2–16 in combination with 60 mg/m2 docetaxel on day1 for 21 days. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was employed for erlotinib from 100 to 150 mg/dose. The phase II primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The ORR and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a binomial distribution. This study required 45 patients. Results In the phase I part, the planned dose escalation was completed without reaching MTD. The RD of erlotinib was determined as 150 mg/dose. In the phase II part, the ORR and disease control rate were 17.1% (95%CI: 7.2–32.1%) and 53.7% (95%CI: 37.4–69.3%), respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (95%CI: 3.1–4.5) and 11.3 (95%CI: 8.6–16.6) months, respectively. The common non-hematological adverse event was febrile neutropenia (grade 3–4:19.6%). Two treatment-related deaths were occurred because of interstitial lung disease and pleural infection. Conclusions Intermittent dosing of erlotinib plus docetaxel is clinically feasible in phase I part but did not significantly improve ORR in phase II part.

Romidepsin (HDACi) plus cisplatin and nivolumab triplet combination in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1076-1076
Author(s):  
Priyanka Sharma ◽  
Vandana G Abramson ◽  
Anne O'Dea ◽  
Lauren Elizabeth Nye ◽  
Ingrid A. Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recognition And Response ◽  
Minimax Design

1076 Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) upregulate genes involved in antigen presentation machinery and increase expression of natural killer group 2, member D ligands (NKG2DL), thus resulting in enhanced tumor cell recognition and response to PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade. Cisplatin and HDACi combination synergistically induces cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and DNA damage. This phase I-II trial investigated combination of romidepsin (HDACi) plus cisplatin and nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in mTNBC. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had mTNBC with any number of prior chemotherapies. Phase I was 3+3 dose-escalation design with three dose levels of romidepsin (8, 10, 12mg/m2, D2, 9) plus cisplatin 75mg/m2 D 1 every 21 days. Phase II treatment included romidepsin plus cisplatin plus nivolumab 360mg every 21 days and was designed according to Simon’s two stage minimax design. Primary endpoints were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and objective response rate (ORR). Additional endpoints included safety, PFS, and pharmacokinetics. Results: 51 patients were enrolled (N=13 phase I, N=38 phase II) between 2015-2020. 69% had received ≥1 prior metastatic chemotherapy, 47% had prior platinum, 53% had liver metastasis, 12% had BRCA1/2 mutation, and 11% had PD-L1 positive disease. There were no dose limiting toxicities in phase I. The RP2D was romidepsin 12mg/m2 D2,9 + cisplatin 75mg/m2 D1 + nivolumab 360mg D1 every 21 days. Thrombocytopenia (G3:27%, G4:0%), neutropenia (G3:25%, G4:0%), anemia (G3:22%, G4:0%), nausea (G3:22%, G4:0%), and vomiting (G3:20%, G4:0%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. 21% of patients had immune AEs (G3-4:8%). Among 34 evaluable phase II patients, ORR was 44% (Table), median PFS was 4.4 months, and 1-year PFS was 23%. Median OS was 10.3 months and 1-year OS was 43%. No pharmacokinetic interactions were detected with co-administration of romidepsin-cisplatin-nivolumab. Conclusions: The triplet combination of romidepsin plus cisplatin and nivolumab was well tolerated and shows encouraging efficacy in pretreated mTNBC, including in patients with PD-L1 negative disease and in those with liver metastasis. Correlative biomarker work is ongoing. This combination warrants further evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02393794 .[Table: see text]

Phase I and pharmacologic study of 9-aminocamptothecin given by 72-hour infusion in adult cancer patients.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1236-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Dahut ◽  
N Harold ◽  
C Takimoto ◽  
C Allegra ◽  
A Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Stimulating Factor ◽  
Initial Cycle ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE To conduct a phase I and pharmacologic study of the new topoisomerase I inhibitor, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). PATIENTS AND MATERIALS A 72-hour infusion of 9-AC was administered every 14 days to 48 solid-tumor patients at doses of 5 to 59 microg/m2/h without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and 47 to 74 microg/m2/h with G-CSF. RESULTS Without G-CSF, two of eight patients who received 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their initial cycle, as did both patients who received 59 microg/m2/h (with a platelet count < 25,000/microL in one). With G-CSF, zero of seven patients treated with 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their first cycle, while dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in six of 14 patients (with platelet count < 25,000/microL in five) entered at 59 microg/m2/h. Among 39 patients entered at > or = 25 microg/m2/h 9-AC with or without G-CSF, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting of grade 2 severity ultimately occurred in 54%, 30%, and 38%, respectively, while grade 3 toxicities of each type occurred in 8% of patients. Steady-state 9-AC lactone concentration (Css) increased linearly from 0.89 to 10.6 nmol/L, and correlated strongly with leukopenia ( r = .85). CONCLUSION The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC given by 72-hour infusion every 2 weeks is 35 microg/m2/h without G-CSF or 47 microg/m2/h with G-CSF support. Dose escalation in individual patients may be possible according to their tolerance.

Combination of Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tumors: Results of Two Independent Phase I Studies With Pharmacokinetics

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Wasserman ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
François Lokiec ◽  
François Goldwasser ◽  
Salima Kalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase I Studies ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Minute Period ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Febrile Episodes

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2. At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of estramustine phosphate and short infusions of paclitaxel in women with solid tumors.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2959-2963 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Garcia ◽  
S Keren-Rosenberg ◽  
D Parimoo ◽  
M Rogers ◽  
S Jeffers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Estramustine Phosphate ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
P Glycoprotein ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. Paclitaxel pharmacology was to be studied at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patients at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m2, while EMP was given at 900 and 1,200 mg/m2/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding and on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the presence of EMP 900 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients received a total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common at EMP 1,200 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 225 mg/ m2; this was considered the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m2 of this agent with 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented against breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics without and with EMP did not differ. CONCLUSION EMP 900 mg/m2 for 3 days and 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tolerated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlikely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein.

The Combination of Quizartinib with Azacitidine or Low Dose Cytarabine Is Highly Active in Patients (Pts) with FLT3-ITD Mutated Myeloid Leukemias: Interim Report of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib potently and selectively inhibits FLT3 kinase activity. In a phase I and II studies the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) or cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I part is to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of quizartinib (AC220) with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II, presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite. Phase II enrollment is limited to patients >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML, or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Additional eligibilities include performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function, normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include QTcF> 450 mSec, concomitant drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is defined as 28 days. Treatment comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle (Days 1-7), or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle (Days 1-10) along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2) uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase 2 is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for overall response rate of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Twenty-six (Phase I=12, phase II=14) pts have been enrolled: 18 to AZA arm and 8 to LDAC arm. Median age is 62 years (range, 25-79 years), 7 (27%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=14, +8=2, -7=2, miscellaneous=6, 11q and t(8;21)= 1 each. Median number of prior therapies is 2 (range, 0-7), 7 patients received prior FLT3 inhibitor. For both schedules quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on emerging results from separate dose-finding study. Eighteen [5 in LDAC arm (63%) and 13 (72%) in AZA arm; all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation] of 26 total pts (69%) have responded (CR=1/ CRp=3/ CRi=2/ MLFS=10/PR=1/HI=1). Among patients with FLT3-ITD (N=22), ORR is 82%. Four of 7 (57%) patients with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median number of days to respond is 57 days (range, 25-102 days). Among responders two patients died (MLFS=1, PR=1): one with gastro-intestinal bleeding and other with progressive pneumonia. Three additional responders have discontinued therapy for stem cell transplant (1), withdrawal of consent (1), and loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation (1). Nine responders (CR=1, CRi=1, CRp=1, PR=1, MLS=5) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and 2 additional pts (CR=1, CRi=1) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. Number of pts with treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypophosphatemia (5), hyponatremia (4), hypocalcemia (4), hyperbilirubinemia (3), increase in ALT (1), hypernatremia (1hyperglycemia (1), hypotension (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD . Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to both arms of the current trial continues. Disclosures Cortes: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document