Phase I Trial of Intravenous Administration of PV701, an Oncolytic Virus, in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2251-2266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Pecora ◽  
Naiyer Rizvi ◽  
Gary I. Cohen ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Daniel Sterman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Intravenous Administration ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Repeat Dose ◽  
Tumor Cell Membrane ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Higher Doses

PURPOSE: PV701, a replication-competent strain of Newcastle disease virus, causes regression of tumor xenografts after intravenous administration. This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of single and multiple intravenous doses of PV701 as a single agent in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with advanced solid cancers that were unresponsive to standard therapy were enrolled. Four PV701 intravenous dosing regimens were evaluated: (1) single dose: one dose every 28 days; (2) repeat dose: three doses in 1 week every 28 days; (3) desensitizing: one lower dose followed by two higher doses in 1 week every 28 days; and (4) two week: one lower dose followed by five higher doses over 2 weeks every 21 days. RESULTS: A 100-fold dose intensification was achieved over 195 cycles. A first-dose MTD of 12 × 109 plaque-forming units (PFU)/m2 was established for outpatient dosing. After an initial dose of 12 × 109 PFU/m2, patients tolerated an MTD for subsequent doses of 120 × 109 PFU/m2. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms that occurred principally after the first dose and were decreased in number and severity with each subsequent dose. Tumor site–specific adverse events and acute dosing reactions were also observed but not cumulative toxicity. Objective responses occurred at higher dose levels, and progression-free survival ranged from 4 to 31 months. Tumor tissue from one patient was obtained after 11 months of therapy and showed evidence of PV701 particles budding from the tumor cell membrane by electron microscopy and a pronounced lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate by histologic examination. CONCLUSION: PV701 warrants further study as a novel therapeutic agent for cancer patients.

A phase I/Ib study of crenolanib with ramucirumab (RAM)/paclitaxel (PTX) as second-line therapy (2L tx) for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 116-116
Author(s):  
Megan Greally ◽  
Sujata Jha ◽  
Sam S. Yoon ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Avni Mukund Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Higher Doses

116 Background: PTX/RAM as 2L tx for patients (pts) with EGA is a standard-of-care based on the RAINBOW trial (Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1224). However, benefit is modest. Upregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)/PDGF receptor-β (PDGFR-β) pathway causes resistance to VEGF inhibition. Crenolanib is a selective inhibitor of PDGFR-β. We report initial results of the dose escalation phase of a study of crenolanib plus RAM/PTX in pts with previously treated advanced EGA. Methods: This phase I/Ib study is enrolling ECOG PS 0-1 EGA pts with progression on first-line chemo. PTX 80 mg/m2/ day on day 1, 8, 15 and RAM 8mg/kg q 14 days were administered with escalating doses of crenolanib (60, 80, 100 mg BID) after a 7 day “run-in” of crenolanib to assess crenolanib-related toxicities. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of crenolanib plus RAM/PTX. Safety and preliminary efficacy were examined. Results: 15 pts were treated; 12 male, median age 58 (32-73), 66% were ECOG PS 1. Primary site was gastric in nine pts, GEJ in 4 pts and esophageal in two pts. Three pts each received crenolanib 60mg BID and 80mg BID, six pts received 100mg BID and three pts received higher doses. At data cutoff, eight pts continued on treatment. 12 pts have completed the DLT evaluation period across 3 dose levels (60 to 100 mg BID). Median treatment duration was 76 days (35-191). The combination was well tolerated, with no DLTs or serious adverse events (SAEs) attributed to study drug. Treatment related adverse events occurred in two pts (17%), all grade 1. These were fatigue, nausea, vomiting and hypertension. Disease progression was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation; no pt discontinued due to study drug related AEs. Nine pts were evaluable for response. One pt had objective response; the disease control rate was 78%. Median PFS and OS were 4.1 and 11.9 months respectively. Conclusions: Crenolanib plus RAM/PTX appears well tolerated at a dose level of 100mg BID. Further evaluation is needed to determine efficacy. Accrual is ongoing at higher doses. Once the MTD is defined, the dose expansion phase will enroll 25 pts. Updated data with pharmacokinetics and biomarkers will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03193918.

scholarly journals Pediatric Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Vorinostat: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (22) ◽  
pp. 3623-3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Fouladi ◽  
Julie R. Park ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Richard J. Gilbertson ◽  
Paula Schaiquevich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Higher Doses

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of vorinostat administered as a single agent and in combination 13-cis retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory solid tumors; to evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a vorinostat suspension in children. Patients and Methods Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m2/d with escalations planned in 30% increments. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. Acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation was assessed by Western blotting of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled on this multipart trial. In patients with solid tumors, the MTD was 230 mg/m2/d with dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia at 300 mg/m2/d. DLTs observed with the combination of 13cRA and vorinostat included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and hypertriglyceridemia, resulting in a MTD of vorinostat 180 mg/m2/d 4 times per week and 13cRA 80 mg/m2/dose twice per day, days 1 through 14 every 28 days. Wide interpatient variability was noted in vorinostat disposition, with area under the concentration-time curves at 230 mg/m2/d for the capsule (range, 1,415 to 9,291 ng/mL × hr) and oral suspension (range, 1,186 to 4,780 ng/mL × hr). Significant accumulation of acetylated H3 histone in PBMC was observed after administration of vorinostat, particularly at higher doses. One patient with neuroblastoma experienced a complete response to the combination. Conclusion In children with recurrent solid tumors, vorinostat is well-tolerated at 230 mg/m2/d, with a modest dose reduction being required when combining vorinostat with 13cRA. Drug disposition is similar to that observed in adults.

Fractionated dose radiolabeled antiprostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioimmunotherapy (177Lu-J591) with or without docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 194-194
Author(s):  
Jaspreet S Batra ◽  
Beerinder S Karir ◽  
Shankar Vallabhajosula ◽  
Paul J. Christos ◽  
Gillian Hodes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Higher Doses

194 Background: A phase II trial single-dose 177Lu-J591 was published. Dose fractionation offers theoretic advantages and 2 phase I dose-escalation studies of 177Lu-J591 have been performed to test the hypothesis that higher cumulative radiation doses can be administered with an acceptable toxicity profile. Methods: Pts with mCRPC and normal neutrophil and platelet counts were enrolled in 2 sequential phase I dose-escalation studies: (1) 177Lu-J591 administered as a single-agent 2 doses 2-weeks apart to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with expansion cohorts at the recommend phase II doses (RP2D) and (2) fractionated dose 177Lu-J591 in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2q3 weeks to determine the MTD. Results: 44 men with median age 75.4 (range 55.1-95.2) were enrolled in the single-agent fractionated dose escalation 177Lu-J591 trial and 15 men with median age 69.1 (49.3-80.8) were enrolled in 177Lu-J591 + docetaxel trial. The RP2D’s of fractionated 177Lu-J591 were 40 mCi/m2 x2 or 45 mCi/m2 x2 with the option for GCSF; at these doses (n=28), 8 (28.6%) with >50%, 11 (39.3%) >30%, and 16 (57%) of 28 pts with any PSA decline; pts at RP2D lived longer (p<0.0001). Predictable, reversible myelosuppression was seen. 18 (40.9%) received chemo prior to RIT and 24 (54.5%) received chemo post 177Lu-J591 [median of 7 cycles (range 1-20)]. In combination with docetaxel, the MTD/RP2D of 177Lu-J591 is 40 mCi/m2x2 doses (delivered with cycle 3), with 73.3% >50%, 80.0% >30%, and 86.7% with any PSA decline. Conclusions: Fractionated 177Lu-J591 is tolerated with subsequent PSA declines and reversible myelosuppression. The apparent dose-response of single-dose 177Lu-J591 appears confirmed with fractionated dosing (improved PSA declines and OS at higher doses). Despite predictable myelosuppression, chemotherapy is able to be delivered prior to 177Lu-J591, concurrently, or following radioimmuotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00538668 , NCT00916123 .[Table: see text]

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

scholarly journals Axitinib in combination with radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Lin Yang ◽  
Mau-Shin Chi ◽  
Hui-Ling Ko ◽  
Yi-Ying Huang ◽  
Su-Chen Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Abstract Background To investigate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of axitinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1–3 inhibitor, in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods This phase I study followed the rule of traditional 3 + 3 design. Major eligibility included: (1) patients with advanced HCC unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization, or who failed after prior local–regional treatment; (2) failure on sorafenib or no grant for sorafenib from health insurance system. Eligible patients with advanced HCC received axitinib for total 8 weeks during and after RT. Three cohorts with axitinib dose escalation were planned: 1 mg twice daily (level I), 2 mg twice daily (level II) and 3 mg twice daily (level III). The prescribed doses of RT ranged from 37.5 to 67.5 Gy in 15 fractions to liver tumor(s) and were determined based on an upper limit of mean liver dose of 18 Gy (intended isotoxic RT for normal liver). The primary endpoint was MTD of axitinib in combination with RT. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), RT in-field response rate, acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results Total nine eligible patients received axitinib dose levels of 1 mg twice daily (n = 3), 2 mg twice daily (n = 3) and 3 mg twice daily (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) did not occur in the 3 cohorts; the MTD was defined as 3 mg twice daily in this study. ORR was 66.7%, including 3 complete responses and 3 partial responses, at 3 months after treatment initiation. With a median follow-up of 16.6 months, median OS was not reached, 1-year OS was 66.7%, and median PFS was 7.4 months. Conclusions Axitinib in combination with RT for advanced HCC was well tolerated with an axitinib MTD of 3 mg twice daily in this study. The outcome analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small total cohort. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02814461), Registered June 27, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02814461

scholarly journals A phase I study of a dual PI3-Kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Lang ◽  
Lydia Wunderle ◽  
Susanne Badura ◽  
Eberhard Schleyer ◽  
Monika Brüggemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Efficient Treatment

Abstract Background Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single centre open lable study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia.Methods Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300-400 mg BID (cohort -1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmakokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3+3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase. Results Twenty-four patients with ALL (n=11) or AML (n=12) or CML-BP (n=1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n=5) or more lines of therapy (n=5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability. Conclusions Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. registered 19th Decembre 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118

scholarly journals Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With Gemcitabine-Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Aram F. Hezel ◽  
Thomas Abrams ◽  
Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Gemcitabine Refractory

PurposeThe PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is activated in the majority of pancreatic cancers, and inhibition of this pathway has antitumor effects in preclinical studies. We performed a multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II study of RAD001(everolimus), an oral inhibitor of mTOR, in patients who experienced treatment failure on first-line therapy with gemcitabine.Patients and MethodsThirty-three patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated continuously with RAD001 at 10 mg daily. Prior treatment with fluorouracil in the perioperative setting was allowed. Patients were observed for toxicity, treatment response, and survival.ResultsTreatment with single-agent RAD001 was well-tolerated; the most common adverse events were mild hyperglycemia and thrombocytopenia. No patients were removed from the study because of drug-related adverse events. No complete or partial treatment responses were noted, and only seven patients (21%) had stable disease at the first restaging scans performed at 2 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. One patient (3%) had a biochemical response, defined as ≥ 50% reduction in serum CA19-9.ConclusionAlthough well-tolerated, RAD001 administered as a single-agent had minimal clinical activity in patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer. Future studies in metastatic pancreatic cancer should assess the combination of mTOR inhibitors with other agents and/or examine inhibitors of other components of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3074-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
E K Rowinsky ◽  
S H Kaufmann ◽  
S D Baker ◽  
L B Grochow ◽  
T L Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Sequence Dependence ◽  
Renal Tubular

PURPOSE A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

A Phase I–II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) (Vc) and Oral Cyclophosphamide (CY) Plus Prednisone (P) for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Abstract We have previously reported that a simple, well-tolerated regimen of weekly oral CY (500mg) and alternate day prednisone (50–100mg) produced partial responses (PR) in 40% of 56 patients (pts) in relapse after ASCT; median progression-free survival was 18.6 months (Blood2004; 104[11]: 311b). To build upon these favorable results, we have designed an ongoing phase I–II trial adding Vc to this regimen. CY was given p.o. once weekly on days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle while prednisone was given every other morning. CY was given before Vc on appropriate days. A maximum of 8 cycles was administered. Sixteen pts have been entered so far. Patients characteristics: Median age was 59 (48–74) years; 9 were male. The Ig subtypes were: IgG kappa:lambda = 9:2, IgA kappa:lambda = 1:2; kappa light chain = 2. All had received VAD, i.v. CY (2.5 g/m2) + G-CSF mobilization followed by ASCT and 2 had undergone a second ASCT; other prior regimens included melphalan and prednisone in 5 pts, thalidomide in 10, lenalidomide in 1, α-interferon in 3, vaccine therapy in 1 and oral CY + P in 8. The median pretreament ß2-microglobulin level was 279 (147 – 875) nm/L, albumin 39 (30–42) g/L and creatinine 91 (60–112) umol/L. The dose escalation schedule to date is as follows: Dose Level N P dose CY dose (mg/m2) Vc dose (mg/m2) 1 6 100 150 0.7 d 1,8,15 2 3 100 300 0.7 d 1,8,15 3 3 100 300 1.0 d 1,8,15 4 4 100 300 1.0 d 1,4,8,11 Three further dose escalations to a maximum Vc dose of 1.5 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 are allowed if dose limiting toxicity does not occur. Toxicities during cycle 1: All pts have completed cycle 1. Three episodes of grade (gr) 3 sinopulmonary infection occurred during a community outbreak at dose level 1; levofloxacin prophylaxis during the first cycle was added and no further infections during the initial cycle were observed. One pt at dose level 3 experienced transient gr 4 hypophosphatemia which reversed without therapy. At dose level 4, cycle 1 was interrupted in one pt due to gr 4 leukopenia (gr 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) related to disease, while a second pt developed grade 4 elevation in transaminases which recovered quickly when Vc was held on d 8. Pt accrual continues. Toxicities of subsequent cycles: To date, 47 additional cycles have been given. SAE’s consisted of pneumonia during cycle 2 in the same 3 patients with infection during cycle 1 and one of these with progressive disease had another bout during cycle 3. Gr 3 toxicities included anemia in 2 cycles, leucopenia in 2, neutropenia in 4, hypophosphatemia in 1 and hyperglycemia in 2; reversible gr 4 hypophosphatemia recurred in the pt mentioned above in 1 other cycle. No liver or other organ toxicity was observed. Maximum gr of peripheral neuropathy was 1. Responses: Responses were assessed after cycles 2, 4, 6 and 8. Best response included near CR (1), PR (4), MR (4), stable disease (5), progression (1) and too early (1). Two pts have completed all 8 cycles, while 4 have progressed; 10 remain on study. Preliminary Conclusions: 1) Vc can be added to a continuous program of oral CY + P with acceptable hematologic toxicity; 2) no neurotoxicity &gt; gr 1 has been observed; 3) the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination regimen has not yet been defined; 4) future plans include a randomized National Cancer Institute of Canada trial comparing the the MTD of this combination to Vc in relpased MM pts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document