Combination Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 4643-4648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. DeAngelis ◽  
Wendy Seiferheld ◽  
S. Clifford Schold ◽  
Barbara Fisher ◽  
Christopher J. Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽  
Cranial Irradiation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

PURPOSE: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Cranial irradiation alone rarely results in long-term disease control or prolonged survival. We prospectively studied the use of combination chemotherapy plus cranial irradiation in newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 102 newly diagnosed, immunocompetent patients with PCNSL; 98 were assessable. Patients first received five cycles of methotrexate 2.5 g/m2, vincristine, procarbazine, and intraventricular methotrexate (12 mg). Whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) was administered to a total dose of 45 Gy and all patients received high-dose cytarabine after RT. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of patients with measurable disease had a complete response to preirradiation chemotherapy and 36% had a partial (> 50%) response, for a 94% response rate. Median progression-free survival was 24.0 months and overall survival was 36.9 months. Age was an important prognostic factor; median survival was 50.4 months in patients younger than 60 and only 21.8 months in those aged 60 or older (P < .001). Fifty-three percent of patients had grade 3 or 4 toxicity during induction chemotherapy, half of which was hematologic. However, 12 patients (15%) experienced severe delayed neurologic toxicity, eight of whom died. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter trial demonstrating improved survival with the combination of chemotherapy plus RT compared with previous reports of RT alone. A high-dose methotrexate-based regimen produced a high response rate before RT was administered. High-dose methotrexate combined with cranial irradiation is an effective therapeutic approach to PCNSL, but neurotoxicity is a delayed risk of this approach.

scholarly journals High-dose methotrexate-based regimens and post-remission consolidation for treatment of newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: meta-analysis of clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyao Yu ◽  
Huaping Du ◽  
Xueshi Ye ◽  
Lifei Zhang ◽  
Haowen Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

AbstractWith the exception of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), there is currently no defined standard treatment for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). This review focused on first-line induction and consolidation treatment of PCNSL and aimed to determine the optimal combination of HD-MTX and the long-term beneficial consolidation methods. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE identified 1407 studies, among which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed by using Stata SE version 15. Forest plots were generated to report combined outcomes like the complete response rate (CRR), overall survival, and progression-free survival. We also conducted univariate regression analyses of the baseline characteristics to identify the source of heterogeneity. Pooled analysis showed a CRR of 41% across all HD-MTX-based regimens, and three- and four-drug regimens had better CRRs than HD-MTX monotherapy. In all combinations based on HD-MTX, the HD-MTX + procarbazine + vincristine (MPV) regimen showed pooled CRRs of 63% and 58% with and without rituximab, respectively, followed by the rituximab + HD-MTX + temozolomide regimen, which showed a pooled CRR of 60%. Pooled PFS and OS showed that post-remission consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was associated with the best survival outcome, with a pooled 2-year OS of 80%, a 2-year PFS of 74%, a 5-year OS of 77%, and a 5-year PFS of 63%. Next, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) + chemotherapy showed a pooled 2-year OS of 72%, 2-year PFS of 56%, 5-year OS of 55%, and 5-year PFS of 41%, with no detectable CR heterogeneity throughout the entire treatment process. In HD-MTX-based therapy of newly diagnosed PCNSL, MPV with or without rituximab can be chosen as the inductive regimen, and the rituximab + HD-MTX + temozolomide regimen is also a practical choice. Based on our study, high-dose chemotherapy supported by ASCT is an efficacious approach for consolidation. Consolidation with WBRT + chemotherapy can be another feasible approach.

scholarly journals PC3 - 130 A Meta-Analysis on the use of High-Dose Methotrexate Only Versus Combination Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Newly-Diagnosed Patients with Primary CNS Lymphoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (S4) ◽  
pp. S20-S21
Author(s):  
M.C. Concepcion Sales
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an unusual extranodal form of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma with a locally aggressive course but a rare tendency to disseminate systemically. There are various modalities available for the treatment of PCNSL which include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery and immunotherapy. The effectiveness of adding another anti-neoplastic agent to HD-MTX have been optimized in small scale studies yet the “ perfect combination” has yet to be elucidated Objectives: This study aims to 1) compare the response to treatment of monotherapy with high-dose Methotrexate (HD-MTX) versus HD-MTX and an additional anti-neoplastic agent by evaluating complete response, partial response, stable disease and disease progression and 2) to compare the hematologic and non-hematologic side effects among patients subjected to monotherapy vs combination chemotherapy. Methodology: Journals from Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL) and other relevant websites (www.clinicaltrials.org) without any restrictions in the year, language and status of publication were searched. Literatures cited by eligible studies and systemic reviews were also checked to identify useful articles. The following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used: ‘primary CNS lymphoma’, ‘treatment’, ‘chemotherapy’ and ‘randomized control trial’. Statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 5.1. Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (95% CI) were used as summary statistics. Results and Conclusion: The use of high-dose methotrexate and another anti-neoplastic agent showed benefit in terms of achieving complete response and delaying disease progression among patients diagnosed with PCNSL. However, the risks of hematologic toxicities such as anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and infection was higher in patients treated with the combination chemotherapy. Significant non-hematologic side effects such as mucositis was also observed in patients receiving an add-on to high dose methotrexate.

Newly diagnosed high-risk malignant brain tumors with leptomeningeal dissemination in young children: A final update on Head Start II Regimen A2 intensified with high-dose methotrexate

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9552-9552
Author(s):  
S. Chi ◽  
S. Gardner ◽  
L. Y. Ji ◽  
R. Sposto ◽  
G. Dhall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Head Start ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Leptomeningeal Dissemination ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

9552 Background: The prognosis for young children with newly diagnosed malignant brain tumors with leptomeningeal dissemination remains poor. From Jan 1997 to Mar 2003, “Head Start II” Regimen A2, intensified with high-dose methotrexate, was offered to this high-risk population. Methods: Eligibility: patients < 10 yrs of age; confirmed diagnosis of medulloblastoma (MB), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), ependymoma and choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC); and high-risk status as determined by neuroaxis dissemination. Patients with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), regardless of stage, were also eligible. Treatment: 5 cycles of vincristine (0.05 mg/kg/week × 3 doses), cisplatin (3.5 mg/kg), etoposide (4 mg/kg/day × 2 days), cyclophosphamide (65 mg/kg/day × 2 days), and methotrexate (400 mg/kg) with leucovorin. Children without progressive disease (PD) by the end of induction underwent a single consolidation cycle (carboplatin, etoposide, thiotepa) with autologous stem cell rescue. Reduced dose RT (2340cGy CSI and focal boost) was reserved for any with residual disease at the end of induction or for the older patient (>6 yrs of age). Results: 40 patients were enrolled (MB, 22; PNET, 6; ependymoma, 5; AT/RT, 6; CPC, 1), med age at diagnosis 38 mos (range 5 to 119 mos). Significant toxicities of this intensified regimen included GI toxicities and infections. Among the entire cohort, there were 26 CR, 6 PR, 2 with stable disease and 4 with PD (and 2 toxic deaths), for a CR +PR response rate of 82%. For disseminated MB (4 M1; 2 M2; 16 M3), the CR rate alone is 77% (17/22). The 5-year EFS and OS for disseminated MB are 45% (95% CI, 24 % to 64%) and 54% (95% CI, 31% to 72%), respectively. Of note, 6/12 MB survivors (all M3) did not receive RT and all are NED >5 years from diagnosis. In addition, there are 3 AT/RT survivors, 12, 54 and 66 mos post-diagnosis who did not receive RT. Conclusions: This intensified regimen is feasible and tolerable. For patients with disseminated MB, the majority of whom had M3 disease at diagnosis, the impressive response rate and outcomes suggest that the addition of methotrexate is justified for future studies. Long- term neuropsychological outcomes are being studied at this time. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Treatment outcomes of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: Single center experience from south India.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13010-e13010
Author(s):  
Krishna Mohan V T Mallavarapu ◽  
Santa Ayyagari ◽  
Senthil Jagannathan Rajappa ◽  
Krishnam Raju Alluri ◽  
Sudha Murthy S
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

e13010 Background: Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare neoplasm of the brain accounting for 1-2% of all brain tumours. Incidence and histopathologic features of PCNSL in India has been reported; however, reports on therapy outcomes of the disease are lacking. We report treatment outcomes of patients with PCNSL at our institute. Methods: Case records of all patients treated for PCNSL between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Epidemiologic details, treatments given, progression free and overall survival were calculated. Patients who completed at least high dose methotrexate (1.5 gram/ m2) for 5 courses with or without RT were included for analysis. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from diagnosis till death/lost to follow up. Results: A total of seventeen patients were analysed. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years and M: F ratio was 1.14:1. Thirteen out of seventeen patients were eligible for analysis; six could complete the total treatment protocol which included methotrexate, vincristine, procarbazine, Dexamethasone, Radiation therapy followed by high dose cytarabine. Median overall survival was 20 months (range 2-54 months). Among those who completed the protocol, median survival at 21 months was not reached with 66% survival. Conclusions: Treatment of PCNSL with at least high dose methotrexate with or without whole brain radiation offers moderate results. Completion of treatment protocol is associated with better overall survival.

Randomized phase III study of high-dose methotrexate and whole brain radiotherapy with or without concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: JCOG1114C.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2500-2500
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Mishima ◽  
Ryo Nishikawa ◽  
Yoshitaka Narita ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Minako Sumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

2500 Background: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that penetrates the blood-brain barrier with moderate toxicity, and has shown anti-tumor activity in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in single arm studies. Our goal was to determine whether the addition of concomitant and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy to standard treatment of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for PCNSL improves survival in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: We did an open-label, randomized phase III trial at 30 hospitals in Japan enrolling immunocompetent patients (pts) aged 20-70 years with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed PCNSL. Pts enrolled at step 1 registration received HD-MTX (MTX; 3.5 g/m2 at day 1, 15, 29). Pts who received at least 1 cycle of HD-MTX were randomly assigned (1:1) at step 2 registration to receive WBRT (30 Gy) ± 10 Gy boost (control arm: A) or WBRT ± boost with concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily) and adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 28 days) for two years after initiation of HD-MTX or until tumor progression (experimental arm: B). Randomization was adjusted by institution, PS (0-1 / 2-3), age (≤60/≥61 years), presence or absence of intraparenchymal tumor after HD-MTX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The planned sample size was 130 pts in total, to provide an 80% power to detect a 0.52 hazard ratio (65% vs 80% in 2y-OS) for arm B to A and a one-sided alpha of 5%. Results: Between September 29, 2014 and October 15, 2018, 134 pts were enrolled, of whom 122 were randomly assigned and analyzed; 62 to arm A and 60 to arm B. At the planned interim analysis, the 2-y OS was 86.8% (95% CI: 72.5-94.0) in arm A and 71.4% (56.0-82.2) in arm B. The hazard ratio was 2.18 (95% CI: 0.95 to 4.98) with predictive probability for showing the superiority of arm B at the final analysis was calculated to be 1.3%. The study was terminated due to futility. The 2-y progression-free survival was 60.6% (43.6-73.8) in arm A and 49.9% (34.4-63.5) in arm B with a hazard ratio of 1.54 (0.88 to 2.70). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were lymphopenia, observed in 7 (11.5%) pts during WBRT in arm A, 18 (30%) pts during WBRT + concomitant TMZ and 18 (37.5%) pts during adjuvant TMZ in arm B. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the benefit of the addition of TMZ to WBRT and adjuvant TMZ in newly diagnosed PCNSL. Possible biomarkers including methylation status of the MGMT promoter in the tumors will be analyzed. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180207 .

Phase 1B of ibrutinib and high-dose methotrexate for recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7533-7533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Jacqueline Stone ◽  
Craig Nolan ◽  
Elina Tsyvkin ◽  
Julia Wolfe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Phase 1B

7533 Background: Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Outcome and treatment options for patients with recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease are poor. We have observed promising efficacy of single agent ibrutinib in r/r PCNSL and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL). In this phase 1B trial, we investigate the toxicity of ibrutinib in combination with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in r/r PCNSL/SCNSL. Methods: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL/SCNSL or newly diagnosed SCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and with any number and type of prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL disease, systemic disease needed to be absent. HD-MTX was given at 3.5g/m2 every 2 weeks for a total of 8 doses. To minimize adverse events, ibrutinib was stopped on days of HD-MTX infusion and was restarted 5 days after MTX infusion or after completion of MTX-clearance, if clearance of MTX required more than 5 days. Ibrutinib was continued daily after completion of 8 doses of MTX. Results: Six patients have been enrolled; 3 received 560mg and 3 received 840mg ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX. Median age was 62 (range 43-74); median ECOG 1 (0:2; 1:3; 2:1). Two had r/r PCNSL and 4 SCNSL. Three had brain disease, one isolated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement and two parenchymal and CSF involvement. Three patients had recurrent (2 PCNSL; 1 SCNSL), two refractory (both SCNSL), and one newly diagnosed disease (SCNSL). There were no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 events were observed in 5 patients (lymphopenia in 3, ALT elevation in 2, diarrhea in 1, electrolyte changes in 1, hypertension in 1). The most common adverse events were hypokalemia, low WBC, hyperglycemia, ALT and AST elevation. There was no dose reduction of methotrexate or ibrutinib in any patient. After a median follow-up of 130 days, all patients were evaluated for response after 4 doses of HD-MTX, with 4/6 (67%) showing a response: 2 CR, 2 PR, and 1 SD, 1 PD; both non-responders were refractory SCNSL. Ibrutinib concentrations were measured in plasma and CSF. Conclusions: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate the combination of HD-MTX and Ibrutinib (at 560 and 840mg) well. Continued enrollment into a combination arm that includes rituximab, methotrexate and ibrutinib is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02315326.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document